Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 23.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008 Sep;79(3):447–451.

Experimental Infection of Eastern Gray Squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis) with West Nile Virus

Andrés Gómez 1,*, Laura D Kramer 1, Alan P Dupuis II 1, A Marm Kilpatrick 1, Lauren J Davis 1, Matthew J Jones 1, Peter Daszak 1, A Alonso Aguirre 1
PMCID: PMC3632857  NIHMSID: NIHMS288867  PMID: 18784241

Abstract

Eastern gray squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis) have shown high West Nile virus (WNV) seroprevalence, and WNV infection has been suggested as a cause of morbidity and mortality in this species. We experimentally infected nine eastern gray squirrels with WNV to determine the clinical effects of infection and to assess their potential role as amplifying hosts. We observed no morbidity or mortality attributable to WNV infection, but lesions were apparent in several organs. We detected mean viremias of 105.1 and 104.8 plaque-forming units (PFU)/mL on days 3 and 4 post-infection (DPI) and estimated that ~2.1% of Culex pipiens feeding on squirrels during 1–5 DPI would become infectious. Thus, S. carolinensis are unlikely to be important amplifying hosts and may instead dampen the intensity of transmission in most host communities. The low viremias and lack of mortality observed in S. carolinensis suggest that they may be useful as sentinels of spillover from the enzootic amplification cycle.

INTRODUCTION

West Nile virus (WNV) is primarily maintained in an enzootic cycle involving birds and ornithophilic mosquitoes in which mammals are considered incidental hosts.1 Disease caused by WNV is most commonly reported in horses, humans, and some bird species (e.g., corvids), but WNV exposure has been detected in a broad range of domestic and wild mammal species.26 Most experimental infections of mammals have demonstrated viremia titers that are too low to lead to a large fraction of mosquitoes that can transmit WNV, and therefore, mammals are generally considered incompetent WNV hosts.711

Recent studies have found higher viremia titers (> 105 plaque-forming units [PFU]/mL) in experimental infections of eastern cottontail rabbits (Sylvilagus floridanus),12 eastern chipmunks (Tamias striatus),13 and golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus).14 Viremias greater than ~105 PFU/mL are necessary to result in transmitting mosquitoes, and the percent transmitting appears to increase approximately linearly from 0% at 104.6 PFU/mL to 50% at 108.3 PFU/mL1, with variability between and within Culex pipiens populations. Viremia titers in the most infectious species, eastern chipmunks, would result in an average of 7.2% of Cx. pipiens mosquitoes feeding 1–5 days post infection (DPI) becoming infectious (i.e., transmitting).1 Although chipmunks are still a relatively poorly competent host compared with most birds except galliformes and columbiformes,1 the possibility that some peri-domestic wild mammals could be amplifying hosts for WNV is an important consideration for public health. This has raised the question of the reservoir status of species living in close proximity to humans in endemic areas.

Eastern gray squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis) are common throughout the eastern United States, have been introduced in certain areas of the western states, and can reach high densities in urban and suburban areas.15 Eastern gray squirrels are also frequently exposed to WNV and WNV infection has been reported as a cause of morbidity and mortality in S. carolinensis and fox squirrels (Sciurus niger).3,1618 The objectives of this study were to determine the clinical effects (including morbidity and mortality) of WNV infection in the laboratory and to assess the potential role of S. carolinensis as a WNV amplifying host.

METHODS

Animal collection and holding

Eleven wild eastern gray squirrels were captured using baited Tomahawk live traps (48.3 × 15.2 × 15.2 cm; Tomahawk Live Trap Company, Tomahawk, WI) near Albany, New York. Upon capture, animals were chemically restrained and tagged, weighed, given a cursory health evaluation, dusted for ectoparasites, and a 0.1 mL blood sample was taken from the femoral vein. Captured animals were placed into two age categories differentiating the young of the year from older individuals. Each animal was housed individually in an unfiltered stainless steel rack cage in a biosafety level 3 facility at the Griffin Laboratories, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health. Animals were fed a diet of mixed nuts, fruits, vegetables, high digestibility dry dog food, and rodent chow; water was provided ad libitum. Housing and handling protocols were approved by Wadsworth Center's Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Protocol Number 05-404).

Experimental protocol

All animals were placed in quarantine for 14 days and verified to be in good body condition and seronegative for WNV, St. Louis encephalitis virus, and Powassan virus. The experimental group consisted of 9 animals and was balanced by sex and age (4 females and 5 males, 5 juveniles and 4 adults). The 2 remaining animals (a juvenile female and an adult male) were used as uninfected controls. At the end of the 14-day quarantine period, animals in the experimental group were needle-inoculated subcutaneously with 105 PFU of WNV strain 03-1956 (isolated from an American crow Corvus brachyrhynchos, in New York in 2003). This dose is similar to the dose of virus injected by Cx. pipiens and Cx. tarsalis, and gave statistically indistinguishable viremia profiles in chickens to infection by bite from a single mosquito.19,20 Uninfected controls were injected with sterile phosphate buffered saline solution.

All animals were bled daily for 7 DPI, and were observed twice daily for clinical signs of infection until the end of the experiment (14 DPI). Blood samples (0.1 mL) were obtained from the femoral vein on alternating limbs and dispensed into tubes containing 0.9 mL BA-1 medium (M199 medium with Hank's salts, 1% bovine albumin, TRIS base (tris [hydroxymethyl] aminomethane), sodium bicarbonate, 2% fetal bovine serum, 100 units/mL of penicillin, 100 mg/mL of streptomycin, 1 mg/mL of Fungizone). The diluted blood samples were immediately stored at –80°C before viremia was measured by plaque assay on African green monkey kidney (Vero) cells.21 Urine and feces were collected opportunistically. All animals were euthanized and necropzied on 14 DPI. Tissue samples from the brain, heart, kidney, liver, muscle, skin, and spleen were collected, fixed with 10% buffered formalin, processed for histopathologic examination, and stained with hematoxylin and eosine. An additional set of tissue samples was processed immediately for the presence of WNV RNA using RNeasy Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA).

Laboratory analyses

Blood samples were tested for WNV antibodies by plaque-reduction neutralization assay (PRNT)22,23 at a 1:10 dilution and using 90% neutralization cutoff to confirm infection. The urine samples were concentrated prior to RNA extraction using Centricon centrifugal filters (YM-30, Millipore, Billerica, MA). Viral RNA was extracted using QIAmp Viral RNA Mini Kit and amplified using the Qiagen One-Step RT-PCR system (Qiagen, Valencia, CA).

Statistical analyses

We estimated the WNV host competence index of squirrels over the viremic periods, approximating the percentage of mosquitoes feeding on infected squirrels that would become infectious. Komar and others24 originally developed this formula and Kilpatrick and others1 modified it to include viremia-transmission data from vector competence studies from four populations of Cx. pipiens. We calculated 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the index that incorporated variability between squirrels in daily viremia, and variability and error in the viremia-mosquito infectiousness relationship. We generated 10,000 random draws from daily viremia distributions with mean and variance estimated from the data, and used these and the viremia-infectiousness relationship fit to data from four Cx. pipiens populations (fraction of Cx. pipiens transmitting = 0.1349 Log10 viremia = 0.6235; N = 13; R2 = 66.3%; P = 0.001; standard error [SE] of regression = 0.1299) to generate 10,000 predicted values, which incorporate the error of the regression of infectiousness. We took the upper and lower 2.5% of these estimates as the 95% confidence limits.

RESULTS

All nine infected animals and two controls survived until 14 DPI. Two experimentally infected animals developed a mild, self-limiting suppurative conjunctivitis on 4 and 5 DPI, but no other clinical signs were observed during the study period. Most necropsies were unremarkable and only a mild nephritis was observed in three infected animals. No additional gross findings were apparent, and all animals were in good body condition at the time of necropsy.

We detected WNV viremia in all experimentally infected animals (Table 1). Viremia titers were first detected at 1 DPI and remained detectable until 5 DPI. Average viremia was highest (105.1±0.4 PFU/mL) on 3 DPI, and the highest individual titers (105.5 and 105.6 PFU/mL) were detected on 3 and 4 DPI (Table 1). Viremia titers did not differ between age classes or sexes, but sample sizes were relatively small (4–5 per group) (Table 1). Eastern gray squirrels had an average host competence index of 0.106 (95% CI, 0–0.66), indicating that on average 2.1% (95% CI, 0–13%) of Cx. pipiens feeding on Eastern gray squirrels during the 5 DPI would become infectious.

Table 1.

Sex, age, and West Nile virus viremia titers (Log10 PFU/mL) in experimentally infected eastern gray squirrels (limit of detection was 102 PFU/mL)

Days post infection
Sex* Age 1 2 3 4 5
M J < 2.0 3.7 5.3 4.7 3.3
M J < 2.0 4.6 5.5 4.3 4.2
M A < 2.0 3.4 5.1 4.9 4.5
M A < 2.0 3.3 4.3 4.9 4.2
M A < 2.0 3.4 5.1 5.6 4.4
F J < 2.0 3.9 5.2 4.5 3.3
F J < 2.0 3.5 4.7 4.1 3.3
F J < 2.0 3.3 5.1 5.0 2.4
F A 2.0 4.0 5.2 5.5 4.2
Mean (± SD) 3.7 ± 0.4 5.1 ± 0.4 4.8 ± 0.5 3.8 ± 0.7
*

M = males: 4.4 ± 0.72 PFU/mL; F = females: 4.2 ± 0.88 PFU/mL (repeated-measures analysis of variance [ANOVA]: F1,7 = 0.163, P = 0.698).

J = juveniles: 4.24 ± 0.84 PFU/mL; A = adults: 4.5 ± 0.73 PFU/mL; (repeated-measures ANOVA: F1,7 = 1.244, P = 0.302).

We observed microscopic lesions in the brain, kidney, spleen, and liver. All infected animals presented pathologic changes in the brain, including lymphoid perivascular cuffs (9/9 infected animals), gliosis in the cortex (5/9) and hippocampus (3/9), and lymphocytic meningitis (3/9). No pathologic changes in the brain were observed in the uninfected controls. A renal lesion characterized by moderate lymphocytic infiltrates was found in both infected (3/9) animals and uninfected (1/2) controls. In one of the infected animals a subacute lymphocytic and tubulo-interstitial nephritis with mild loss of tubules was apparent. In two infected animals and one control, we identified a lymphocytic infiltrate in the kidney. We observed mild lymphoid depletion in the spleen of three infected animals and one control. Minimal lymphocytic cholangitis was present in three infected animals and one control, and we observed focal inflammation in the liver of one infected and one control.

We found WNV RNA in the brain and spleen of all nine animals and in the skin over the site of injection of 8 of 9 of the infected animals (Table 2). Viral RNA was also present in the kidney (7/9 animals), striated muscle (7/9), heart (5/9), and liver (4/9) (Table 2). No viral RNA was found in any tissue in the uninfected controls. We detected WNV RNA in urine from 1 to 12 DPI and in feces from 4 to 6 DPI; shedding in feces and/or urine was found intermittently in all animals in the experimental group (Table 2) and none of the controls.

Table 2.

Viral titers (PFU equivalent) isolated in tissue, urine, and feces in S. carolinensis experimentally infected with WNV (limit of detection was 0.09 PFU/mL)

Sample (no. tested) Mean ± SD Log10PFU (equivalent)/g
Brain (11) 3.09 ± 0.68
Heart (11) 0.44 ± 0.35
Kidney (11) 1.09 ± 1.39
Liver (11) 0.54 ± 0.42
Muscle (11) 0.45 ± 0.711
Skin (11) 1.83 ± 0.69
Spleen (11) 2.83 ± 0.73
Urine (45)* 2.66 ± 0.95
Feces(15)* 2.24 ± 1.52
*

Log10 PFU (equivalent)/mL.

DISCUSSION

The WNV infection in S. carolinensis produced a moderate viremia of short duration, in a pattern resembling that found in S. niger.11 In some experimentally infected species significantly higher viremias have been detected in younger animals,12 but in this study viremias in young of the year S. carolinensis were not significantly different from those of adults. Although peak viremia titers observed in this study (105.6 PFU/mL) have been shown to be sufficient to infect some mosquito species,12,25,26 these viremias may be too low to result in a significant fraction of biting vectors becoming infectious, i.e., able to transmit virus. This highlights the need to consider not the infection of mosquitoes, but the fraction that can transmit virus.

Previous studies have found relatively high WNV seroprevalence in eastern gray squirrels living in WNV endemic areas,3,6,27 and other studies have shown that a key WNV vector, Cx. pipiens, feeds on squirrels.28,29 Given their abundance in close proximity to human populations15 and their low viremia relative to the bird species with which they are most frequently associated, eastern gray squirrels may dampen the intensity of WNV transmission by feeding mosquitoes that would otherwise feed on those more competent hosts. Although this species may be fed on by some Aedes mosquitoes, (e.g., Ae. albopictus or Ae. trivitattus which show similar susceptibility to Cx. pipiens26) the extremely low prevalence observed in Ae. trivittatus in Connecticut (2 of 3,306 pools of 72,132 mosquitoes30; minimum infection rate [MIR] = 0.00002) and New York suggests that infection of this species by squirrels or other hosts is rare, and this species appears to be a relatively minor vector of WNV to humans in New York.31

Manifestations of disease caused by WNV infection of tree squirrels include neurologic signs such as ataxia, tremors, circling, lethargy, and chewing at the feet.1618 In this study, as in experimental infections of fox squirrels and other mammal species,7,911 we observed no clinical signs or abnormal behaviors in the infected animals at any time during our experimental period. Although ocular signs are a feature of some human WNV cases32 and may be a feature of WNV infection in dogs,33 we cannot definitively attribute the mild conjunctivitis we observed in two infected animals to WNV infection.

As with other WNV infected species, necropsies were mostly unremarkable.7,11 Natural WNV infection leading to severe neurologic signs and death in S. carolinensis and S. niger have also resulted in no gross pathologic changes.16,17 The only macroscopic change we observed was mild to moderate renal congestion in 3 infected animals, which were later shown also to have microscopic kidney lesions. Nephritis was the only consistently observed lesion in naturally infected fox squirrels in Michigan.17 However, kidney lesions in infected tree squirrels in Illinois16 were considered independent of WNV infection and in experimentally infected fox squirrels, renal lesions were present in both infected animals and uninfected controls.11 No pathologic changes were observed in other organs regardless of the presence or severity of microscopic lesions. Microscopic lesions in the central nervous system were indicative of viral infection and consistent with previous findings of WNV encephalitis in humans and other mammals, including tree squirrels.11,16,17,3436 Although cardiac lesions are often found in WNV infected mammals,16,17,33,37 none of the squirrels in this study showed pathological changes in the heart.

Our observations indicate that animals in the experimental group were not significantly affected by WNV infection, even those individuals in which we found severe microscopic lesions. It is possible that WNV infection could aggravate previously existing conditions and cause morbidity and mortality in weak or otherwise ill animals, but that healthy tree squirrels are able to survive infection. Future studies are needed to ascertain whether WNV infection could affect survival in grey squirrels by other means, such as increasing susceptibility to predation or by limiting the capacity for foraging.

The WNV RNA persisted in tissues until the end of this study (14 DPI) and was recovered intermittently in feces (up to 6 DPI, although sampling was incomplete thereafter) and urine (up to 12 DPI). Although the kidney was found to be the best organ for reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing in naturally infected tree squirrels in California,18 we did not detect WNV RNA in the kidneys of 2 out of 9 infected animals and amplified higher levels of RNA from brain and spleen samples. Previous studies have demonstrated WNV transmission to vertebrates by ingestion of infected prey.7,38 The persistence of viral RNA in tissues raises the possibility that ingestion of WNV infected gray squirrels could be an alternative source of infection for predator species. Although we found no evidence of lateral transmission, the squirrels were caged individually and therefore further research is needed to ascertain whether the persistent shedding of viral RNA in urine and feces could result in viral transmission.39

In summary, our results indicate that WNV infection is not likely to be an important cause of direct mortality for S. carolinensis and squirrels are more likely, in some situations, to dampen WNV transmission than to amplify it. These results, in combination with previous studies that have shown that S. carolinensis is frequently exposed to WNV,3,6,27 suggest that they make an ideal sentinel for WNV transmission to mammals.

Acknowledgments

We thank K. Platt, J. Root, and the staff at the Wildlife Center of Virginia for kindly sharing their restraint and husbandry protocols with us. We also thank M. Behr for invaluable assistance with tissue processing and microscopic pathology. We are grateful to R. Waniewski, F. Blaisdell, K. Bernard, A. Jones, R. Smith, and the animal care staff at the Wadsworth Center for advice and logistical support. Two anonymous reviewers provided comments that improved an original version of this manuscript.

Financial support: This work was funded by NIAID contract #NO1-AI-25490, NSF grant EF-0622391 as part of the joint NSF-NIH Ecology of Infectious Disease program, a Columbia University Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Faculty Fellowship, and the Whitley Fund for Nature.

Footnotes

Authors’ addresses: Andrés Gómez, Department of Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Biology, Columbia University, 1200 Amsterdam Avenue, MC 5557, New York, NY 10027, Tel: 212-854-9987, ag2112@caa.columbia.edu. Laura D. Kramer, Alan P. Dupuis II, Lauren J. Davis, and Matthew J. Jones, Griffin Laboratory, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, 5668 State Farm Road, Guilderland, NY 12084, Tel: 518 869-4500, ldk02@health.state.ny.us, apd05@health.state.ny.us, ljd03@health.state.ny.us, and mjj05@health.state.ny.us. A. Marm Kilpatrick, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, A308 Earth and Marine Sciences, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, Tel: 845 596 7474, marm@biology.ucsc.edu. Peter Daszak, The Consortium for Conservation Medicine, 460 West 34th Street, 17th Floor, New York, NY 10001, Tel: 212-380-4473, daszak@conservationmedicine.org. A. Alonso Aguirre, Wildlife Trust, 460 West 34th Street, 17th Floor, New York, NY 10001, Tel: 212-380-4460, aguirre@wildlifetrust.org.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Kilpatrick AM, LaDeau SL, Marra PP. Ecology of West Nile virus transmission and its impact on birds in the western hemisphere. Auk. 2007;124:1121–1136. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bentler KT, Hall JS, Root JJ, Klenk K, Schmit B, Blackwell BF, Ramey PC, Clark L. Serologic evidence of West Nile virus exposure in North American mesopredators. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007;76:173–179. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dietrich G, Montenieri JA, Panella NA, Langevin S, Lasater SE, Klenk K, Kile JC, Komar N. Serologic evidence of West Nile virus infection in free-ranging mammals, Slidell, Louisiana, 2002. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2005;5:288–292. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2005.5.288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.McLean RG, Ubico SR, Bourne D, Komar N. West Nile virus in livestock and wildlife. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2002;267:271–308. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-59403-8_14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Komar N, Panella NA, Boyce E. Exposure of domestic mammals to West Nile Virus during an outbreak of human encephalitis, New York City, 1999. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;7:736–738. doi: 10.3201/eid0704.010424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Root JJ, Hall JS, McLean RG, Marlenee NL, Beaty BJ, Gansowski J, Clark L. Serologic evidence of exposure of wild mammals to flaviviruses in the central and eastern United States. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005;72:622–630. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Austgen LE, Bowen RA, Bunning ML, Davis BS, Mitchell CJ, Chang GJJ. Experimental infection of cats and dogs with West Nile virus. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10:82–86. doi: 10.3201/eid1001.020616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bunning ML, Bowen RA, Cropp CB, Sullivan KG, Davis BS, Komar N, Godsey MS, Baker D, Hettler DL, Holmes DA, Biggerstaff BJ, Mitchell CJ. Experimental infection of horses with West Nile virus. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:380–386. doi: 10.3201/eid0804.010239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Davis A, Bunning M, Gordy P, Panella N, Blitvich B, Bowen R. Experimental and natural infection of North American bats with West Nile virus. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005;73:467–469. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Teehee ML, Bunning ML, Stevens S, Bowen RA. Experimental infection of pigs with West Nile virus. Arch Virol. 2005;150:1249–1256. doi: 10.1007/s00705-004-0478-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Root JJ, Oesterle PT, Nemeth NM, Klenk K, Gould DH, McLean RG, Clark L, Hall JS. Experimental infection of fox squirrels (Sciurus niger) with West Nile virus. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006;75:697–701. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tiawsirisup S, Platt KB, Tucker BJ, Rowley WA. Eastern cottontail rabbits (Sylvilagus floridanus) develop West Nile virus viremias sufficient for infecting select mosquito species. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2005;5:342–350. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2005.5.342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Platt KB, Tucker BJ, Halbur PG, Tiawsirisup S, Blitvich BJ, Fabiosa FG, Bartholomay LC, Rowley WA. West Nile virus viremia in eastern chipmunks (Tamias striatus) sufficient for infecting different mosquitoes. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:831–837. doi: 10.3201/eid1306.061008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Xiao SY, Guzman H, Zhang H, da Rosa A, Tesh RB. West Nile Virus infection in the golden hamster (Mesocricetus auratus): a model for West Nile encephalitis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;7:714–721. doi: 10.3201/eid0704.010420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Koprowski JL. Sciurus carolinensis. Mamm Species. 1994;479:1–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Heinz-Taheny KM, Andrews JJ, Kinsel MJ, Pessier AP, Pinker-ton ME, Lemberger KY, Novak RJ, Dizikes GJ, Edwards E, Komar N. West Nile virus infection in free-ranging squirrels in Illinois. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2004;16:186–190. doi: 10.1177/104063870401600302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kiupel M, Simmons HA, Fitzgerald SD, Wise A, Sikarskie JG, Cooley TM, Hollamby SR, Maes R. West Nile virus infection in Eastern fox squirrels (Sciurus niger). Vet Pathol. 2003;40:703–707. doi: 10.1354/vp.40-6-703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Padgett KA, Reisen WK, Kahl-Purcell N, Fang Y, Cahoon-Young B, Carney R, Anderson N, Zucca L, Woods L, Husted S, Kramer VL. West Nile virus infection in tree squirrels (Rodentia: Sciuridae) in California, 2004–2005. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007;76:810–813. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Styer LM, Bernard KA, Kramer LD. Enhanced early West Nile virus infection in young chickens infected by mosquito bite: effect of viral dose. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006;75:337–345. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Styer LM, Kent KA, Albright RG, Bennett CJ, Kramer LD, Bernard KA. Mosquitoes inoculate high doses of West Nile virus as they probe and feed on live hosts. Plos Pathogens. 2007;3:1262–1270. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0030132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Payne AF, Binduga-Gajewska I, Kauffman EB, Kramer LD. Quantitation of flaviviruses by fluorescent focus assay. J Virol Methods. 2006;134:183–189. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2006.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Calisher CH, Karabatsos N, Dalrymple JM, Shope RE, Porter-field JS, Westaway EG, Brandt WE. Antigenic relationships between flaviviruses as determined by cross-neutralization tests with polyclonal antisera. J Gen Virol. 1989;70:37–43. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-70-1-37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ebel GD, Dupuis AP, Nicholas D, Young D, Maffei J, Kramer LD. Detection by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay of antibodies to West Nile virus in birds. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:979–982. doi: 10.3201/eid0809.020152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Komar N, Langevin S, Hinten S, Nemeth N, Edwards E, Hettler D, Davis D, Bowen R, Bunning ML. Experimental infection of North American birds with the New York 1999 strain of West Nile virus. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:311–322. doi: 10.3201/eid0903.020628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Reisen WK, Fang Y, Martinez VM. Avian host and mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) vector competence determine the efficiency of West Nile and St. Louis encephalitis virus transmission. J Med Entomol. 2005;42:367–375. doi: 10.1093/jmedent/42.3.367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tiawsirisup S, Platt KB, Evans RB, Rowley WA. A comparison of West Nile virus transmission by Ochlerotatus trivittatus (COQ.) Culex pipiens (L.), and Aedes albopictus (Skuse). Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2005;5:40–47. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2005.5.40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gomez A, Kilpatrick AM, Kramer LD, Dupuis AP, Jones MJ, Goetz SJ, Marra PP, Daszak P, Aguirre AA. Land use and West Nile virus seroprevalence in wild mammals. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:962–965. doi: 10.3201/eid1406.070352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kilpatrick AM, Daszak P, Jones MJ, Marra PP, Kramer LD. Host heterogeneity dominates West Nile virus transmission. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences. 2006;273:2327–2333. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Molaei G, Andreadis TA, Armstrong PM, Anderson JF, Voss-brinck CR. Host feeding patterns of Culex mosquitoes and West Nile virus transmission, northeastern United States. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:468–474. doi: 10.3201/eid1203.051004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Andreadis TG, Anderson JF, Vossbrinck CR, Main AJ. Epidemiology of West Nile virus in Connecticut: a five-year analysis of mosquito data 1999–2003. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2004;4:360–378. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2004.4.360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kilpatrick AM, Kramer LD, Campbell SR, Alleyne EO, Dobson AP, Daszak P. West Nile virus risk assessment and the bridge vector paradigm. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11:425–429. doi: 10.3201/eid1103.040364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Truemper EJ, Romero JR. West Nile virus. Pediatr Ann. 2007;36:414–422. doi: 10.3928/0090-4481-20070701-09. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lichtensteiger CA, Heinz-Taheny K, Osborne TS, Novak RJ, Lewis BA, Firth ML. West Nile virus encephalitis and myocarditis in wolf and dog. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:1303–1306. doi: 10.3201/eid0910.020617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Cantile C, Del Piero F, Di Guardo G, Arispici M. Pathologic and immunohistochemical findings in naturally occurring West Nile Virus infection in horses. Vet Pathol. 2001;38:414–421. doi: 10.1354/vp.38-4-414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Del Piero F, Stremme DW, Habecker PL, Cantile C. West Nile flavivirus polioencephalomyelitis in a Harbor seal (Phoca vitulina). Vet Pathol. 2006;43:58–61. doi: 10.1354/vp.43-1-58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sampson BA, Ambrosi C, Charlot A, Reiber K, Veress JF, Armbrustmacher V. The pathology of human West Nile Virus infection. Hum Pathol. 2000;31:527–531. doi: 10.1053/hp.2000.8047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Pergam SA, Delong CE, Echevarria L, Scully G, Goade DE. Case report: myocarditis in West Nile Virus infection. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006;75:1232–1233. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Komar N. West Nile virus: epidemiology and ecology in North America. Adv Virus Res. 2003;61:185–234. doi: 10.1016/s0065-3527(03)61005-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Dawson JR, Stone WB, Ebel GD, Young DS, Galinski DS, Pensabene JP, Franke MA, Eidson M, Kramer LD. Crow deaths caused by West Nile virus during winter. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:1912–1914. doi: 10.3201/eid1312.070413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES