Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2013 May;57(5):2380–2382. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02037-12

Rapid Emergence of Echinocandin Resistance during Candida kefyr Fungemia Treatment with Caspofungin

A Fekkar a,b,, I Meyer a, J Y Brossas b, E Dannaoui c, M Palous a, M Uzunov d, S Nguyen d, V Leblond d, D Mazier a,b,e, A Datry a,b,e
PMCID: PMC3632960  PMID: 23439642

Abstract

Echinocandin drugs are widely used for the treatment of candidemia. Resistance is considered rare, and only a few cases of breakthrough candidiasis in patients receiving echinocandin have been reported worldwide. We report here for the first time a Candida kefyr isolate that acquired echinocandin resistance very rapidly after the initiation of caspofungin treatment for candidemia. We characterized the FKS gene mutation responsible for the resistance via the comparison of isolates sampled before and during treatment.

TEXT

A61-year-old woman was admitted to the hematological unit at Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital (Paris, France) for acute myeloid leukemia. The patient was not then receiving and had no history of receiving antifungal drugs. During chemotherapy-induced aplasia, a blood culture sampled at day 1 yielded positive for yeast at day 3. Considering the clinical condition of the patient, echinocandin antifungal therapy was chosen. Treatment by caspofungin was initiated on day 3 (70 mg the first day and then 50 mg/day; patient weight, 60 kg). Analysis of the strain with API 20C (bioMérieux, France) strips and mass spectrometry (Bruker Daltonics, Germany) clearly identified Candida kefyr (teleomorph, Kluyveromyces marxianus). Before the determination of the MICs, caspofungin treatment was left unchanged. The MICs for caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin as determined by Etest (bioMérieux) were 0.06, 0.03, and 0.03 μg/ml, respectively. For fluconazole, the MIC was 0.25 μg/ml. As the patient's condition did not improve, treatment was switched to fluconazole at day 10. A blood culture sampled the same day was positive for yeast at day 11. Surprisingly, this culture gave C. kefyr again. For this isolate, the MICs for caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin by Etest were 2, 4, and 8 μg/ml, respectively. It should be noted that the determination of MIC by the CLSI reference method showed similar results (Table 1), but considering the recently proposed epidemiological cutoff value (ECV) for echinocandins against C. kefyr (1), for the initial isolate with low MIC echinocandin values, the MIC for caspofungin was above the ECV, whereas those for anidulafungin and micafungin were below. While receiving fluconazole, a blood culture sampled at day 19 was positive for yeast at day 21, and this time Candida krusei was identified. Treatment was then switched to voriconazole at day 23. The patient died at day 30. Of note, the two candidemias were surely of digestive origin; a stool sample collected a few days before the first candidemia was positive for both C. kefyr and C. krusei.

Table 1.

Modification of the amino acid sequence of fks genes and MICs for echinocandins for the susceptible and nonsusceptible C. kefyr isolates

Strain Origin GenBank accession no. Caspofungin exposition (days) Genotype (wild type or FKS mutation) Fksp sequencea
MIC (μg/ml) byb:
HS1 HS2 Etest
CLSI
Csp Mic Anf Csp Mic Anf
C. kefyr
    PSL11051268 Blood JX899422 0 Wild type FLTLSLRDPI DWVRRYTL 0.06 0.03 0.03 0.125 0.125 0.06
    PSL1106226 Blood JX899423 7 T→A in FKS1 HS1 YLTLSLRDPI DWVRRYTL 2 4 8 2 4 2
    PSL1104459 Blood NAc 0 Wild type FLTLSLRDPI DWVRRYTL 0.125 0.06 0.01 0.125 0.125 0.03
    1202035978 Bile NA 0 Wild type FLTLSLRDPI DWVRRYTL 0.125 0.06 0.01 0.125 0.125 0.06
    1205072395 Stool NA 0 Wild type FLTLSLRDPI DWIRRYTL 0.125 0.06 0.01 0.25 0.125 0.06
    1206069902 Blood NA 2 Wild type FLTLSLRDPI DWIRRYTL 0.125 0.03 0.01 0.125 0.125 0.06
    1211088295 Bronchoalveolar lavage specimen NA 0 Wild type FLTLSLRDPI DWIRRYTL 0.125 0.06 0.01 0.125 0.125 0.06
    HEGP2734 Blood NA 0 Wild type FLTLSLRDPI DWVRRYTL 0.06 0.06 0.03 0.25 0.125 0.125
C. albicans ATCC 90028 NA GQ456066.1 NA Wild type FLTLSLRDPI DWIRRYTL
C. glabrata ATCC 90030 Blood HM366440.1 NA Wild type FLILSLRDPI DWVRRYTL
C. tropicalis NA EU676168.1 NA Wild type FLTLSLRDPI DWIRRYTL
Saccharomyces cerevisiae NA U12893.1 NA Wild type FLVLSLRDPI DWVRRYTL
Kluyveromyces lactis NRRL Y-1140 NA XP_451796 NA Wild type FLTLSLRDPI DWVRRYTL
a

Sequences of fks1 HS1 and HS2 were deduced by analogy with those of C. albicans (3). Changed residues are underlined.

b

Csp, caspofungin; Mic, micafungin; Anf, anidulafungin.

c

NA, not available.

Methods, results, and discussion.

Faced with both microbiological resistance and clinical therapeutic failure, we decided to compare the hot spots (HS) of the FKS gene sequences of the two C. kefyr strains, the first identified in the blood culture sampled at day 1 (low echinocandin MIC) and the second at day 10 during caspofungin treatment (high echinocandin MIC). Resistance to echinocandin consistently involves these short FKS sequences that code for the glucan synthase complex enzyme, the latter being the target of echinocandins (2, 3). No information on C. kefyr FKS gene sequences was found in databases such as NCBI GenBank. Therefore, for amplification of the HS regions of the C. kefyr FKS gene, primers were chosen by homology after alignment of different FKS gene sequences from different Candida species. For hot spot 1 (HS1), the forward primer had the sequence 5′-GGTGGTTTATTCACTTCCTACA-3′ and the reverse primer had the sequence 5′-GCGTAGCCAAAGATTGAGCA-3′. For HS2, the forward primer had the sequence 5′-AAGATTGGTGCYGGTATGGG-3′ and the reverse primer had the sequence 5′-RGTDGCAAAACCTCTAGCAGT-3′. For HS1, amplification resulted in a 729-bp DNA fragment and a consequent 243-deduced-amino-acid sequence. The HS1 amino acid sequence identified for the isolate with the low echinocandin MIC was strictly identical to that of the Candida albicans ATCC 90028 strain, as well as that of a Candida tropicalis isolate (4), both susceptible to echinocandin (Table 1). In contrast, analysis of the sequence of the isolate with high echinocandin MIC showed a T→A mutation resulting in an F→Y amino acid substitution of the deduced sequence. This substitution occurred at a position frequently involved in echinocandin resistance (58) and may be compared to the F641Y substitution of C. albicans, which involved the same single-nucleotide change (9), or the F639Y substitution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which is phylogenetically closer (10). For HS2, amplification resulted in a 496-bp fragment, for which no difference was detected between the susceptible and the resistant isolates. Thus, the HS2 sequence was identical to those of other echinocandin-susceptible yeasts, such as the Candida glabrata ATCC 90030 strain (Table 1). The analysis of sequences was thereafter enlarged, and longer sequences (3,628 bp) were deposited in the NCBI database. Several attempts to amplify a potential FKS2 gene were unsuccessful. To give more relevance to our finding, we studied 6 other C. kefyr isolates retrieved from clinical samples, including 3 blood cultures. Echinocandin MIC determinations performed by Etest and the CLSI method were indicative of isolates with relatively low MICs. Finally, molecular analysis of the FKS1 gene showed that the HS1 sequences of these 6 isolates were strictly identical to that of the initial isolate with a low MIC. Concerning HS2, sequences were either identical (n = 3) to the initial isolate or very similar, with only a single-amino-acid modification (n = 3). In the latter case, the HS2 sequence was thus identical to the HS2 sequences of other echinocandin-susceptible Candida isolates, such as C. albicans ATCC 90028 (Table 1).

Despite their cost and the absence of an oral form, echinocandin drugs continue to gain popularity for the treatment of invasive candidiasis; they offer an interesting anti-Candida spectrum, cause no major adverse effects, and do not interact with other drugs. Echinocandin resistance remains rare. In the literature, C. albicans and C. glabrata are the most frequent Candida species to develop echinocandin resistance, findings consistent with their predominance in invasive candidiasis (6, 11). C. kefyr is usually very sensitive to all antifungal drugs. This is especially true for echinocandins: in one study, the echinocandin MIC was ≤0.12 μg/ml for all of the 37 strains collected worldwide (12). We report here what is to our knowledge the first detection of echinocandin resistance in a clinical C. kefyr isolate that led to treatment failure. We provide molecular evidence of the acquisition of resistance via the illustration of a mutation in the FKS gene sequence, which has already been implicated in echinocandin resistance and clinical failure in patients infected by other Candida species.

Of particular interest in our case was the very rapid emergence of resistance, during the first days of treatment. Therefore, the surveillance of the susceptibility to echinocandin of this relatively scarce species, responsible for <1% to 1.6% of cases of candidemia (13, 14), may be of interest. Awaiting other reports of such rapid resistance emergence, we suggest closer monitoring of C. kefyr in patients treated with echinocandins.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The different sequences have been deposited in the NCBI database and are available under accession no. JX899422 and JX899423.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Pfizer, Astellas, and MSD for providing anidulafungin, micafungin, and caspofungin, respectively.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print 25 February 2013

REFERENCES

  • 1. Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ. 2012. Progress in antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida spp. by use of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution methods, 2010 to 2012. J. Clin. Microbiol. 50:2846–2856 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Ohyama T, Miyakoshi S, Isono F. 2004. FKS1 mutations responsible for selective resistance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to the novel 1,3-beta-glucan synthase inhibitor arborcandin C. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:319–322 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Laverdiere M, Lalonde RG, Baril JG, Sheppard DC, Park S, Perlin DS. 2006. Progressive loss of echinocandin activity following prolonged use for treatment of Candida albicans oesophagitis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 57:705–708 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Garcia-Effron G, Kontoyiannis DP, Lewis RE, Perlin DS. 2008. Caspofungin-resistant Candida tropicalis strains causing breakthrough fungemia in patients at high risk for hematologic malignancies. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52:4181–4183 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Baixench MT, Aoun N, Desnos-Ollivier M, Garcia-Hermoso D, Bretagne S, Ramires S, Piketty C, Dannaoui E. 2007. Acquired resistance to echinocandins in Candida albicans: case report and review. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 59:1076–1083 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Dannaoui E, Desnos-Ollivier M, Garcia-Hermoso D, Grenouillet F, Cassaing S, Baixench MT, Bretagne S, Dromer F, Lortholary O, French Mycoses Study Group 2012. Candida spp. with acquired echinocandin resistance, France, 2004–2010. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 18:86–90 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Garcia-Effron G, Lee S, Park S, Cleary JD, Perlin DS. 2009. Effect of Candida glabrata FKS1 and FKS2 mutations on echinocandin sensitivity and kinetics of 1,3-β-d-glucan synthase: implication for the existing susceptibility breakpoint. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53:3690–3699 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ, Andes D, Arendrup MC, Brown SD, Lockhart SR, Motyl M, Perlin DS, CLSI Subcommittee for Antifungal Testing 2011. Clinical breakpoints for the echinocandins and Candida revisited: integration of molecular, clinical, and microbiological data to arrive at species-specific interpretive criteria. Drug Resist. Updat. 14:164–176 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Katiyar S, Pfaller M, Edlind T. 2006. Candida albicans and Candida glabrata clinical isolates exhibiting reduced echinocandin susceptibility. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:2892–2894 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Katiyar SK, Edlind TD. 2009. Role for Fks1 in the intrinsic echinocandin resistance of Fusarium solani as evidenced by hybrid expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53:1772–1778 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Sun HY, Singh N. 2010. Characterisation of breakthrough invasive mycoses in echinocandin recipients: an evidence-based review. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 35:211–218 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Pfaller MA, Boyken L, Hollis RJ, Kroeger J, Messer SA, Tendolkar S, Diekema DJ. 2008. In vitro susceptibility of invasive isolates of Candida spp. to anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin: six years of global surveillance. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46:150–156 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Parmeland L, Gazon M, Guerin C, Argaud L, Lehot JJ, Bastien O, Allaouchiche B, Michallet M, Picot S, Bienvenu AL, Study Group at Hospices Civils de Lyon 2013. Candida albicans and non-Candida albicans fungemia in an institutional hospital during a decade. Med. Mycol. 51:33–37 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Krcmery V, Barnes AJ. 2002. Non-albicans Candida spp. causing fungaemia: pathogenicity and antifungal resistance. J. Hosp. Infect. 50:243–260 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES