Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Intern Med. 2013 May;273(5):429–436. doi: 10.1111/joim.12029

Environmental stress, ageing and glial cell senescence: a novel mechanistic link to Parkinson’s disease?

Shankar J Chinta 1,*, Christopher A Lieu 1,*, Marco DeMaria 1, Remi-Martin Laberge 1, Judith Campisi 1, Julie K Andersen 1
PMCID: PMC3633085  NIHMSID: NIHMS432827  PMID: 23600398

Abstract

Exposure to environmental toxins is associated with a variety of age-related diseases including cancer and neurodegeneration. For example, in Parkinson’s disease (PD), chronic environmental exposure to certain toxins has been linked to the age-related development of neuropathology. Neuronal damage is believed to involve the induction of neuroinflammatory events as a consequence of glial cell activation. Cellular senescence is a potent anti-cancer mechanism that occurs in a number of proliferative cell types and causes the arrest of proliferation of cells at risk of malignant transformation following exposure to potentially oncogenic stimuli. With age, senescent cells accumulate and express a senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP; i.e. the robust secretion of many inflammatory cytokines, growth factors and proteases). Whereas cell senescence in peripheral tissues has been causally linked to a number of age-related pathologies, little is known about the induction of cellular senescence and the SASP in the brain. Based on recently reported findings, we propose that environmental stressors associated with PD may act in part by eliciting senescence and the SASP within non-neuronal glial cells in the ageing brain, thus contributing to the characteristic decline in neuronal integrity that occurs in this disorder.

Introduction

Ageing is a major risk factor for many pathological conditions including cancer, diabetes, heart disease, stroke and neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease (PD) [1]. The incidence of these conditions, which are major causes of death in both industrialized and developing countries, has risen markedly in the last century, largely due to the increase in life-expectancy as well as urbanization. In addition to changes in lifestyle, urbanization is associated with environmental degradation. Indeed, exposure to environmental toxins has been identified as a substantial causal risk factor for the majority of these age-dependent diseases. It is clear that understanding the pathophysiological mechanisms that link environmental toxin exposure to these diseases is crucial in order to develop more effective strategies to prevent or reduce the prevelance of age-related disorders.

One of the most prominent neurodegenerative diseases in which environmental exposure to chemicals plays a significant role is PD. This is the second most common neurodegenerative disease in the USA, affecting more than 1 million individuals. The main pathological characteristic of PD is the preferential loss of dopamine-producing nigrostriatal neurons in a particular region of the brain, the substantia nigra, resulting in marked impairment of motor control. Another pathological feature of PD is the presence of cytoplasmic protein aggregates, known as Lewy bodies, in dopaminergic nerve cells. Lewy bodies contain a variety of proteins, including ubiquitin and alpha-synuclein [2]. The precise aetiology of PD has been under investigation for more than two centuries. Although rare genetically linked cases of PD have been reported, most incidences are sporadic in nature. Late-onset, idiopathic PD is thought to result from the combined effects of genetic risk factors, ageing and environmental exposure to toxins. Two neurotoxic environmental compounds known to induce PD are the widely used herbicide paraquat and the synthetic heroin analogue 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1, 2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP). It is widely believed that chronic exposure to these or analogous compounds constitutes important an environmental risk factor for the future development of PD [3].

Here, we review the potential role of ageing and chronic stress in the process of cellular senescence, which can occur within non-neuronal glial cells in the brain and may in turn have detrimental consequences for neighbouring cells, including neurons. We propose that PD-associated environmental stressors contribute to this process, thereby providing a novel link between environmental exposure to chemicals, glial cell senescence and age-related neurodegenerative events associated with PD.

The ageing brain

The brain is possibly the most multifaceted tissue within complex organisms, controlling processes that are not only vital to life but also crucial for cognition and personality. Loss of brain function, whether through trauma or, much more commonly, ageing, is a huge human and economic burden, especially in developed nations where average life spans are continuously increasing [4, 5].

The brain comprises approximately 2% of the total body weight and, because it consumes about 20% of the total oxygen utilized at rest, is highly prone to oxidative stress. Consequently, the brain generates an abundance of reactive oxygen species (ROS) as normal products of cellular metabolism [6]. It also contains relatively higher amounts of polyunsaturated fatty acids and lower levels of antioxidants than many other tissues, making it further susceptible to oxidative stress. ROS such as superoxide, hydroxyl radicals, hydrogen peroxide and singlet oxygen, produced during normal aerobic metabolism, cause chronic damage to biomolecules which ultimately results in a decline in brain function and contributes to brain ageing [7].

Like most ageing tissues in the body, the ageing brain is characterized by low-level chronic inflammation [8, 9]. This phenomenon has been termed ‘inflammaging’ (‘neuro-inflammaging’ in the brain). Inflammaging is thought to cause or contribute to most, if not all, of the major pathological conditions that are associated with ageing, including neurodegenerative diseases such as PD. An important source of inflammation in the ageing brain is the proliferative glial cells (i.e. astrocytes, oligodendrocytes and microglia). These cells normally provide structural, metabolic and trophic support to neurons [8, 10, 11]. However, they can also have detrimental effects on neighbouring neurons due to chronic production of pro-inflammatory agents, including ROS and leukocyte-attracting cytokines, which occurs with increasing frequency during ageing. One potential cause of age-related inflammation in the brain is cellular senescence (i.e. a tumour suppressive stress response) within the glial cells.

Cellular senescence

Cellular senescence is essentially irreversible loss of proliferative capacity that occurs when cells are exposed to potentially oncogenic stimuli [12]. Similar to apoptosis, this potent tumour suppressive response inhibits tumorigenesis; in this case by preventing the proliferation of cells at risk of malignant transformation. Senescence growth arrest depends on two major tumour suppressor pathways controlled by p53 and p16INK4a [12, 13].

Cellular senescence was first described following the observation that primary cells in culture ceased dividing after a finite number of doublings [14]; this is now known as the Hayflick limit. In subsequent studies it was determined that the cause of this limit of division was an erosion of telomeres, the DNA–protein structures that cap the ends of chromosomes [15, 16]. As a result of the biochemistry of DNA replication, telomeres shorten with each cell division, eventually failing to form a protective cap and resulting in a structure that resembles a DNA double-strand break [1721]. The effort by cells to ‘repair’ uncapped telomeres causes cycles of chromosome fusion and breakage, resulting in chromosomal aberrations that, in turn, can lead to cancer [22]. Stem cells and cancer cells express the enzyme telomerase, which allows them to replace telomeres after cell division. However, most differentiated somatic cells do not express telomerase. Such cells become senescent; that is upon acquiring a critically short telomere, growth is permanently arrested.

In addition to telomere shortening, other types of severe DNA damage can cause cells to become senescent [20, 21]. Many DNA-damaging chemotherapies as well as radiotherapy can, for example, induce senescence [23, 24]. In addition, strong mitogenic signals such as those induced by activated oncogenes can cause the senescence response [12, 25, 26]. Melanocytic nevi provide a clear example of oncogene-induced senescence. These generally benign lesions are composed primarily of senescent melanocytes that harbour an oncogenic mutation in the BRAF gene, which encodes a growth factor signalling protein [27]. Cellular senescence can also be induced by agents or events that disrupt chromatin organization [2830]. Furthermore, oxidative stress can induce cellular senescence, principally by activating the p53 pathway [24, 31, 32]. Various forms of oxidative stress can induce senescence, including exposure to ROS and hyperoxia [26, 31, 33] (Figure 1). We and others recently demonstrated that a genetically induced tissue-specific deficiency in the mitochondrial antioxidant enzyme superoxide dismutase induces cellular senescence and ageing phenotypes in the epidermis of mice [27, 34].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Induction and detection of cellular senescence. Multiple stressors induce cellular senescence in cell culture and in vivo. The over-expression of cell-cycle inhibitors, such as p16 and p21, irreversibly blocks cell proliferation. Activation of oncogenes and telomeric dysfunction eventually cause DNA damage and cell-cycle arrest. Oxidative stress and other stress signals, such as mitochondrial dysfunction, can induce cellular senescence through various mechanisms such as via induction of p53 or DNA damage. Senescent cells acquire a specific phenotype characterized by increased cell size, expression of the lysosomal enzyme B-galactosidase, loss of proliferation, formation of permanent DNA damage foci (DNA segments with chromatin alterations reinforcing senescence or SCARS), chromatin remodelling (SAHF) and induction of a secretory phenotype (SASP).

Immunosurveillance mechanisms have evolved to clear senescent cells in vivo [28, 29, 35, 36]. Nonetheless, senescent cells accumulate with age [3742]. The relative contribution of the numerous inducers of senescence to the age-dependent accumulation of senescent cells is unknown. Telomere shortening is the explanation most often reported, but it is not clear whether this is in fact more common than other forms of stress that lead to senescence.

A striking characteristic of senescent cells is the robust expression and secretion of numerous cytokines, chemokines, growth factors and proteases; this feature is termed the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP). Most SASP factors are upregulated at the level of mRNA [24], in part due to increased transcriptional activities of nuclear factor kappa light chain enhancer of activated B cells (NF-kB) and CCAAT/enhancer binding protein (C/EBP) [4347]. The SASP is a delayed response, primarily to genotoxic stress [20, 21], and depends on the activation of the DNA damage response and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38MAPK) pathways [45, 46]. An important positive feedback component for the development of the SASP in fibroblasts is increased expression of the plasma membrane-bound form of the cytokine interleukin (IL)-1α, which induces its own synthesis through an autocrine, receptor-mediated positive feedback loop involving activation of NF-kB [47].

There are both beneficial and detrimental effects of the SASP. Certain SASP factors can reinforce the senescence growth arrest in an autocrine manner. These factors include the cytokines IL-6 and IL-8, the protease inhibitor plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 and the pleiotropic protein insulin-like growth factor binding protein-7 [43, 44, 48, 49]. The SASP also has beneficial paracrine effects. For example, chemokines or cytokines secreted by senescent cells can recruit natural killer cells, thus facilitating the removal of senescent cells and neighbouring tumour cells [50, 51]; this process is termed ‘senescence surveillance’ [36]. Other SASP factors communicate cellular damage to the surrounding tissue and stimulate repair or limit damage-induced fibrosis [50, 52].

On the other hand, when senescent cells are chronically present, such as during ageing, the SASP can cause ageing phenotypes and pathology. For example, it has been shown that SASP factors disrupt normal mammary tissue structure and function and can even induce malignant phenotypes in pre-malignant or non-aggressive cancer cells in vivo via inflammation and vascularization [24 5356]. SASP factors such as GROα, IL-6 and WNTs can enhance the proliferation of neoplastic epithelial cells [53, 57, 58], or promote epithelial–mesenchymal transition [54], which is a critical step in the development of metastatic cancer [59]. SASP factors can promote malignant phenotypes in culture [55, 57] and tumour growth in vivo [53, 60]. Hence, in contrast to its tumour suppressive action, senescence, through the SASP, can also support malignant tumorigenesis.

Evidence for cellular senescence in the ageing brain

To date, the mechanisms underlying cellular senescence in the brain as well as how senescent non-neuronal cells may affect brain function and pathology remain unclear. Neurons are terminally differentiated cells and do not mount a classic senescence response. However there is evidence that astrocytes, the most predominant proliferative cell type in the mammalian brain, undergo cellular senescence. Astrocytes are involved in a variety of important physiological and pathological processes [52, 61], including modulation of synaptic neuronal function and plasticity [6264]. They are also the primary responders to CNS insults, including infection, trauma and neurodegeneration, by exerting important tissue defence mechanisms. Dysfunctional astrocytes are implicated in neuropathology associated with both normal brain ageing and various age-related neurodegenerative diseases, including PD [65].

Astrocytes cultured from the brains of ageing rats were found to stain positive for the senescence marker senescence-associated beta-galactosidase (SA-Bgal) in conjunction with a reduced ability to maintain the survival of co-cultured neurons. In vivo, astrocytic glial acidic fibrillary protein (GFAP)-positive cells demonstrated a flat morphology, which is another characteristic of senescent cells, as well as age-related synaptic impairment [66]. These findings suggest that loss of neuroprotection during brain ageing coincides with increased astrocytic senescence [67].

Another important type of glial cells, microglia, function as resident macrophages in the CNS [68]. Microglia provide immune surveillance and mediate innate immune responses to invading pathogens or injury. These responses include the secretion of cytokines, prostaglandins and growth factors, production of external ROS and stimulation of phagocytosis [69]. Microglia are normally found in a quiescent (resting) state, characterized by small soma and highly ramified processes. In response to infection or CNS injury, microglia become activated and undergo morphological changes, including shortening of ramified branches and enlargement of the soma. Activated microglia also upregulate cell surface activation antigens and secrete a variety of pro-inflammatory mediators and other potentially neurotoxic factors [70]. Chronic microglial activation has been implicated in the neuronal death associated with neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease and PD [71, 72]. There is strong evidence to suggest that, with advanced age, functional abnormalities occur in the microglia that impair their ability to respond efficiently to stimuli [73, 74]. A comparative study examining both young and old autopsied human brains demonstrated that, with age, microglia transform morphologically from ramified to hypertrophic and dystrophic forms characterized by loss of fine branches (deramification), formation of cytoplasmic spheroids, beading and fragmentation [75, 76]. It has been reported that telomere shortening occurs in rat microglia, both in culture and in vivo, with advancing age, which can lead to senescence [77, 78].

Environmental stress and glial senescence

Is it possible that prolonged environmental stress in the context of the ageing brain could promote glial cell senescence and contribute to age-related neuropathology? Does exposure to agents associated with ageing or neurodegenerative disease result in the senescence of astrocytes or microglia? In a recent study [79] in human and mouse astrocyte cultures it was found that astrocytes undergo cellular senescence in response to a variety of stressors. Exposure to an oxidant (H202) or proteasome inhibitor, or replicative exhaustion all led to the development of characteristics of senescence, including growth arrest, an enlarged flattened morphology, SA-Bgal expression, increased expression of the cell cycle inhibitors p21 and p16INK4a, and the development of senescence-associated heterochromatin foci (SAHF). It is interesting that astrocytes were found to be much more susceptible to oxidative stress-induced senescence than fibroblasts. Oxidative stress in cultured human astrocytes caused by glutathione depletion activated SASP-associated inflammatory pathways (NF-kB and p38MAPK) and stimulated secretion of the SASP-associated cytokine IL-6 [80]. In another recent study it was found that, in response to repeated lipopolysaccharide administration (mimicking chronic inflammation), cultured BV2 microglial cells displayed several signs of senescence, including growth arrest, enhanced SA-Bgal activity and SAHF [81]. Epidemiological studies and data from animal models have shown that exposure to pesticides and other environmental toxins, including paraquat and MPTP, causes PD neuropathology in part via the chronic overstimulation of glial cells and accumulation of ROS and inflammatory factors (particularly cytokines) [8284]. Together, these data suggest that environmental exposure to toxins is capable of inducing senescence and an accompanying SASP, which could contribute to neurodegeneration associated with both normal brain ageing and neurodegenerative disease.

Future perspectives

Based on current understanding of the underlying mechanisms involved, we hypothesize that there may be an inherent link between cellular senescence in the brain and the environmental stressors associated with PD. Paraquat and MPTP are environmental neurotoxins that can have direct neurodegenerative effects on nigrostriatal neurons via inhibition of mitochondrial function and oxidative stress. We propose that these and related environmental stressors may indirectly contribute to neurodegeneration via the induction of glial cell senescence. Evidence supporting a glial SASP, although at present limited, suggests that senescent glia could contribute to age-related neurodegeneration by creating a chronically inflamed milieu. If correct, this novel potential link between glial senescence and PD could change the understanding of how glial cells contribute to age-related neurodegenerative diseases, and in particular the role of environmental exposure in this process.

Table 1.

Glial cellular senescence in the brain

Astrocytes Microglia
Increased SA-Bgal expression Increased SA-Bgal expression
Flat morphology Growth arrest
Increase in p21 and p16INK4a Telomere shortening
Development of SAHF Development of SAHF
Increased SASP-associated inflammatory pathways (NF-kB and p38MAPK) Increase in inflammatory factors
Increased cytokine expression (e.g. IL-6)

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all co-workers of Drs Andersen and Campisi for helpful discussions. The authors’ work referred to in this review was supported by a program project grant from the National Institutes on Aging AG025901, J.K.A. and J.C.); S.J.C. is supported by a California Institute of Regenerative Medicine CIRM training grant (TG2-01155). MD is supported by the American Italian Cancer Foundation.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  • 1.The silver book. Chronic disease and medical innovation in an aging nation. 2009 Available from: http://www.silverbook.org/ [updated 24.05.11]
  • 2.Thomas B, Beal MF. Molecular insights into Parkinson’s disease. F1000 Med Rep. 2011;3:7. doi: 10.3410/M3-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cannon JR, Greenamyre JT. Neurotoxic in vivo models of Parkinson’s disease recent advances. Prog Brain Res. 2010;184:17–33. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(10)84002-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Vaupel JW. Biodemography of human ageing. Nature. 2010;464:536–542. doi: 10.1038/nature08984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Yankner BA, Lu T, Loerch P. The aging brain. Annu Rev Pathol. 2008;3:41–66. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pathmechdis.2.010506.092044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Magistretti PJ, Pellerin L, Rothman DL, Shulman RG. Energy on demand. Science. 1999 Jan 22;283( 5401):496–7. doi: 10.1126/science.283.5401.496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Harman D. Role of free radicals in aging and disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1992;673:126–141. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1992.tb27444.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chung HY, et al. Molecular inflammation: underpinnings of aging and age-related diseases. Ageing Res Rev. 2009;8:18–30. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2008.07.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Franceschi C, et al. Inflammaging and anti-inflammaging: a systemic perspective on aging and longevity emerged from studies in humans. Mech Ageing Dev. 2007;128(1):92–105. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2006.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Martin AR, Wallace BG, Fuchs PA, Nicholls JG. From Neuron to Brain: A Cellular and Molecular Approach to the Function of the Nervous System. 4. Sinauer Associates; 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Allen NJ, Barres BA. Neuroscience: Glia - more than just brain glue. Nature. 2009;457(7230):675–7. doi: 10.1038/457675a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Campisi J, d’Adda di Fagagna F. Cellular senescence: when bad things happen to good cells. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007 Sep;8(9):729–40. doi: 10.1038/nrm2233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Beauséjour CM, Krtolica A, Galimi F, Narita M, Lowe SW, Yaswen P, Campisi J. Reversal of human cellular senescence: roles of the p53 and p16 pathways. EMBO J. 2003 Aug 15;22(16):4212–22. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hayflick L. The limited in vitro life time of human diploid cell strain. Exp Cell Res. 1965 Mar;37:614–36. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(65)90211-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Harley CB, Futcher AB, Greider CW. Telomeres shorten during ageing of human fibroblasts. Nature. 1990 May 31;345(6274):458–60. doi: 10.1038/345458a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bodnar AG, Ouellette M, Frolkis M, Holt SE, Chiu CP, Morin GB, Harley CB, Shay JW, Lichtsteiner S, Wright WE. Extension of life-span by introduction of telomerase into normal human cells. Science. 1998 Jan 16;279(5349):349–52. doi: 10.1126/science.279.5349.349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.d’Adda di Fagagna F, Reaper PM, Clay-Farrace L, Fiegler H, Carr P, Von Zglinicki T, Saretzki G, Carter NP, Jackson SP. A DNA damage checkpoint response in telomere-initiated senescence. Nature. 2003 Nov 13;426(6963):194–8. doi: 10.1038/nature02118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Takai H, Smogorzewska A, de Lange T. DNA damage foci at dysfunctional telomeres. Curr Biol. 2003 Sep 2;13(17):1549–56. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(03)00542-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Herbig U, Jobling WA, Chen BP, Chen DJ, Sedivy JM. Telomere shortening triggers senescence of human cells through a pathway involving ATM, p53, and p21(CIP1), but not p16(INK4a) Mol Cell. 2004 May 21;14(4):501–13. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(04)00256-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rodier F, Coppe JP, Patil CK, Hoeijmakers WA, Munoz DP, Raza SR, Freund A, Campeau E, Davalos AR, Campisi J. Persistent DNA damage signalling triggers senescence-associated inflammatory cytokine secretion. Nat Cell Biol. 2009;11:973–9. doi: 10.1038/ncb1909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Rodier F, Munoz DP, Teachenor R, Chu V, Le O, Bhaumik D, Coppe JP, Campeau E, Beausejour CM, Kim SH, Davalos AR, Campisi J. DNA-SCARS: distinct nuclear structures that sustain damage-induced senescence growth arrest and inflammatory cytokine secretion. J Cell Sci. 2011;124:68–81. doi: 10.1242/jcs.071340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Symington LS, Gautier J. Double-strand break end resection and repair pathway choice. Annu Rev Genet. 2011;45:247–71. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-110410-132435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Roninson IB, Dokmanovic M. Induction of senescence-associated growth inhibitors in the tumor-suppressive function of retinoids. J Cell Biochem. 2003 Jan 1;88(1):83–94. doi: 10.1002/jcb.10320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Coppe JP, Patil CK, Rodier F, Sun Y, Munoz DP, Goldstein J, Nelson PS, Desprez PY, Campisi J. Senescence-associated secretory phenotypes reveal cell-nonautonomous functions of oncogenic RAS and the p53 tumor suppressor. PLoS Biol. 2008;6:2853–68. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Braig M, Schmitt CA. Oncogene-induced senescence: putting the brakes on tumor development. Cancer Res. 2006 Mar 15;66(6):2881–4. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-4006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Collado M, Serrano M. Senescence in tumours: evidence from mice and humans. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010 Jan;10(1):51–7. doi: 10.1038/nrc2772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pollock PM, Harper UL, Hansen KS, Yudt LM, Stark M, Robbins CM, Moses TY, Hostetter G, Wagner U, Kakareka J, Salem G, Pohida T, Heenan P, Duray P, Kallioniemi O, Hayward NK, Trent JM, Meltzer PS. High frequency of BRAF mutations in nevi. Nat Genet. 2003 Jan;33(1):19–20. doi: 10.1038/ng1054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ogryzko VV, Hirai TH, Russanova VR, Barbie DA, Howard BH. Human fibroblast commitment to a senescence-like state in response to histone deacetylase inhibitors is cell cycle dependent. Mol Cell Biol. 1996 Sep;16(9):5210–8. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.9.5210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bandyopadhyay D, Okan NA, Bales E, Nascimento L, Cole PA, Medrano EE. Down-regulation of p300/CBP histone acetyltransferase activates a senescence checkpoint in human melanocytes. Cancer Res. 2002 Nov 1;62(21):6231–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Soliman MA, Berardi P, Pastyryeva S, Bonnefin P, Feng X, Colina A, Young D, Riabowol K. ING1a expression increases during replicative senescence and induces a senescent phenotype. Aging Cell. 2008 Dec;7(6):783–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2008.00427.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Parrinello S, Samper E, Krtolica A, Goldstein J, Melov S, Campisi J. Oxygen sensitivity severely limits the replicative lifespan of murine fibroblasts. Nat Cell Biol. 2003 Aug;5(8):741–7. doi: 10.1038/ncb1024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Klimova TA, Bell EL, Shroff EH, Weinberg FD, Snyder CM, Dimri GP, Schumacker PT, Budinger GR, Chandel NS. Hyperoxia-induced premature senescence requires p53 and pRb, but not mitochondrial matrix ROS. FASEB J. 2009 Mar;23(3):783–94. doi: 10.1096/fj.08-114256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Chen JH, Ozanne SE, Hales CN. Methods of cellular senescence induction using oxidative stress. Methods Mol Biol. 2007;371:179–89. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-361-5_14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Velarde MC, Flynn JM, Day NU, Melov S, Campisi J. Mitochondrial oxidative stress caused by Sod2 deficiency promotes cellular senescence and aging phenotypes in the skin. Aging (Albany NY) 2012 Jan;4(1):3–12. doi: 10.18632/aging.100423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Krizhanovsky V, Yon M, Dickins RA, Hearn S, Simon J, Miething C, Yee H, Zender L, Lowe SW. Senescence of activated stellate cells limits liver fibrosis. Cell. 2008;134:657–67. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.06.049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kang TW, et al. Senescence surveillance of pre-malignant hepatocytes limits liver cancer development. Nature. 2011;479:547–51. doi: 10.1038/nature10599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Jeyapalan JC, Ferreira M, Sedivy JM, Herbig U. Accumulation of senescent cells in mitotic tissue of aging primates. Mech Ageing Dev. 2007 Jan;128(1):36–44. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2006.11.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Dimri GP, Lee X, Basile G, Acosta M, Scott G, Roskelley C, Medrano EE, Linskens M, Rubelj I, Pereira-Smith O. A biomarker that identifies senescent human cells in culture and in aging skin in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Sep 26;92(20):9363–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.20.9363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hjelmeland LM, Cristofolo VJ, Funk W, Rakoczy E, Katz ML. Senescence of the retinal pigment epithelium. Mol Vis. 1999 Nov 3;5:33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Paradis V, Youssef N, Dargère D, Bâ N, Bonvoust F, Deschatrette J, Bedossa P. Replicative senescence in normal liver, chronic hepatitis C, and hepatocellular carcinomas. Hum Pathol. 2001 Mar;32(3):327–32. doi: 10.1053/hupa.2001.22747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Melk A, Kittikowit W, Sandhu I, Halloran KM, Grimm P, Schmidt BM, Halloran PF. Cell senescence in rat kidneys in vivo increases with growth and age despite lack of telomere shortening. Kidney Int. 2003 Jun;63(6):2134–43. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00032.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zhang GR, Cheng XR, Zhou WX, Zhang YX. Age-related expression of STUB1 in senescence-accelerated mice and its response to anti-Alzheimer’s disease traditional Chinese medicine. Neurosci Lett. 2008 Jun 27;438(3):371–5. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.04.075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kuilman T, Michaloglou C, Vredeveld LC, Douma S, van Doorn R, Desmet CJ, Aarden LA, Mooi WJ, Peeper DS. Oncogene-induced senescence relayed by an interleukin-dependent inflammatory network. Cell. 2008;133:1019–31. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.03.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Acosta JC, O’Loghlen A, Banito A, Guijarro MV, Augert A, Raguz S, Fumagalli M, Da Costa M, Brown C, Popov N, Takatsu Y, Melamed J, d’Adda di Fagagna F, Bernard D, Hernando E, Gil J. Chemokine signaling via the CXCR2 receptor reinforces senescence. Cell. 2008;133:1006–18. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.03.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Bhaumik D, Scott GK, Schokrpur S, Patil CK, Orjalo AV, Rodier F, Lithgow GJ, Campisi J. MicroRNAs miR-146a/b negatively modulate the senescence-associated inflammatory mediators IL-6 and IL-8. Aging (Albany NY) 2009;1:402–11. doi: 10.18632/aging.100042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Freund A, Patil CK, Campisi J. p38MAPK is a novel DNA damage response-independent regulator of the senescence-associated secretory phenotype. EMBO J. 2011;30:1536–48. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2011.69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Orjalo AV, Bhaumik D, Gengler BK, Scott GK, Campisi J. Cell surface-bound IL-1alpha is an upstream regulator of the senescence-associated IL-6/IL-8 cytokine network. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:17031–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0905299106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kortlever RM, Higgins PJ, Bernards R. Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 is a critical downstream target of p53 in the induction of replicative senescence. Nat Cell Biol. 2006;8:877–84. doi: 10.1038/ncb1448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Wajapeyee N, Serra RW, Zhu X, Mahalingam M, Green MR. Oncogenic BRAF induces senescence and apoptosis through pathways mediated by the secreted protein IGFBP7. Cell. 2008;132:363–74. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.12.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Krizhanovsky V, Xue W, Zender L, Yon M, Hernando E, Lowe SW. Implications of cellular senescence in tissue damage response, tumor suppression, and stem cell biology. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2008;73:513–22. doi: 10.1101/sqb.2008.73.048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Xue W, Zender L, Miething C, Dickins RA, Hernando E, Krizhanovsky V, Cordon-Cardo C, Lowe SW. Senescence and tumour clearance is triggered by p53 restoration in murine liver carcinomas. Nature. 2007;445:656–60. doi: 10.1038/nature05529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Jun JI, Lau LF. The matricellular protein CCN1 induces fibroblast senescence and restricts fibrosis in cutaneous wound healing. Nat Cell Biol. 2010;12:676–85. doi: 10.1038/ncb2070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Krtolica A, Parrinello S, Lockett S, Desprez PY, Campisi J. Senescent fibroblasts promote epithelial cell growth and tumorigenesis: a link between cancer and aging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:12072–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.211053698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Parrinello S, Coppe JP, Krtolica A, Campisi J. Stromal-epithelial interactions in aging and cancer: senescent fibroblasts alter epithelial cell differentiation. J Cell Sci. 2005;118:485–96. doi: 10.1242/jcs.01635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Coppe JP, Kauser K, Campisi J, Beausejour CM. Secretion of vascular endothelial growth factor by primary human fibroblasts at senescence. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:29568–74. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M603307200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Coppe JP, Patil CK, Rodier F, Krtolica A, Beausejour CM, Parrinello S, Hodgson JG, Chin K, Desprez PY, Campisi J. A human-like senescence-associated secretory phenotype is conserved in mouse cells dependent on physiological oxygen. PLoS One. 2010;5:e9188. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Bavik C, Coleman I, Dean JP, Knudsen B, Plymate S, Nelson PS. The gene expression program of prostate fibroblast senescence modulates neoplastic epithelial cell proliferation through paracrine mechanisms. Cancer Res. 2006;66:794–802. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Castro P, Xia C, Gomez L, Lamb DJ, Ittmann M. Interleukin-8 expression is increased in senescent prostatic epithelial cells and promotes the development of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Prostate. 2004;60:153–9. doi: 10.1002/pros.20051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Laberge RM, Awad P, Campisi J, Desprez PY. Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Induced by Senescent Fibroblasts. Cancer Microenviron. 2012 Apr;5(1):39–44. doi: 10.1007/s12307-011-0069-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Liu D, Hornsby PJ. Senescent human fibroblasts increase the early growth of xenograft tumors via matrix metalloproteinase secretion. Cancer Res. 2007;67:3117–26. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Sofroniew MV. Reactive astrocytes in neural repair and protection. Neuroscientist. 2005 Oct;11( 5):400–7. doi: 10.1177/1073858405278321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Benarroch EE. Neuron-astrocyte interactions: partnership for normal function and disease in the central nervous system. Mayo Clin Proc. 2005 Oct;80(10):1326–38. doi: 10.4065/80.10.1326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Magistretti PJ. Neuron-glia metabolic coupling and plasticity. J Exp Biol. 2006 Jun;209(Pt 12):2304–11. doi: 10.1242/jeb.02208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Verkhratsky A, Parpura V. Recent advances in (patho)physiology of astroglia. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2010 Sep;31(9):1044–54. doi: 10.1038/aps.2010.108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Chen Y, Swanson RA. Astrocytes and brain injury. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2003 Feb;23(2):137–49. doi: 10.1097/01.WCB.0000044631.80210.3C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Mansour H, Chamberlain CG, Weible MW, 2nd, Hughes S, Chu Y, Chan-Ling T. Aging-related changes in astrocytes in the rat retina: imbalance between cell proliferation and celldeath reduces astrocyte availability. Aging Cell. 2008 Aug;7(4):526–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2008.00402.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Pertusa M, García-Matas S, Rodríguez-Farré E, Sanfeliu C, Cristòfol R. Astrocytes aged in vitro show a decreased neuroprotective capacity. JNeurochem. 2007 May;101(3):794–805. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.04369.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Streit WJ. Microglia as neuroprotective, immunocompetent cells of the CNS. Glia. 2002 Nov;40(2):133–9. doi: 10.1002/glia.10154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Doorn KJ, Lucassen PJ, Boddeke HW, Prins M, Berendse HW, Drukarch B, van Dam AM. Emerging roles of microglial activation and non-motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease. Prog Neurobiol. 2012 Jun 23;98(2):222–238. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2012.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Kreutzberg GW. Microglia: a sensor for pathological events in the CNS. Trends Neurosci. 1996;19:312–318. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(96)10049-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Frank-Cannon TC, Alto LT, McAlpine FE, Tansey MG. Does neuroinflammation fan the flame in neurodegenerative diseases? Mol Neurodegener. 2009 Nov 16;4:47. doi: 10.1186/1750-1326-4-47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Sugama S, Takenouchi T, Cho BP, Joh TH, Hashimoto M, Kitani H. Possible roles of microglial cells for neurotoxicity in clinical neurodegenerative diseases and experimental animal models. Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets. 2009 Sep;8(4):277–84. doi: 10.2174/187152809789352249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Conde JR, Streit WJ. Effect of aging on the microglial response to peripheral nerve injury. Neurobiol Aging. 2006;27:1451–1461. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.07.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Sawada M, Sawada H, Nagatsu T. Effects of aging on neuroprotective and neurotoxic properties of microglia in neurodegenerative diseases. Neurodegener Dis. 2008;5:254–256. doi: 10.1159/000113717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Streit WJ, Sammons NW, Kuhns AJ, Sparks DL. Dystrophic microglia in the aging human brain. Glia. 2004 Jan 15;45(2):208–12. doi: 10.1002/glia.10319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Flanary B. The role of microglial cellular senescence in the aging and Alzheimer diseased brain. Rejuvenation Res. 2005;8(2):82–5. doi: 10.1089/rej.2005.8.82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Flanary BE, Streit WJ. Telomeres shorten with age in rat cerebellum and cortex in vivo. J Anti-Aging Med. 2003;6:299–308. doi: 10.1089/109454503323028894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Flanary BE, Streit WJ. Progressive telomere shortening occurs in cultured rat microglia, but not astrocytes. Glia. 2004;45:75–88. doi: 10.1002/glia.10301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Bitto A, Sell C, Crowe E, Lorenzini A, Malaguti M, Hrelia S, Torres C. Stress induced senescence in human and rodent astrocytes. Exp Cell Res. 2010 Oct 15;316(17):2961–8. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2010.06.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Lee M, Cho T, Jantaratnotai N, Wang YT, McGeer E, McGeer PL. Depletion of GSH in glial cells induces neurotoxicity: relevance to aging and degenerative neurological diseases. FASEB J. 2010;24:2533–2545. doi: 10.1096/fj.09-149997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Yu HM, Zhao YM, Luo XG, Feng Y, Ren Y, Shang H, He ZY, Luo XM, Chen SD, Wang XY. Repeated lipopolysaccharide stimulation induces cellular senescence in BV2 cells. Neuroimmunomodulation. 2012;19(2):131–6. doi: 10.1159/000330254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Litteljohn D, Mangano E, Clarke M, Bobyn J, Moloney K, Hayley S. Inflammatory mechanisms of neurodegeneration in toxin-based models of Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsons Dis. 2010 Dec 30;2011:713517. doi: 10.4061/2011/713517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Block ML, Zecca L, Hong JS. Microglia- mediated neurotoxicity: uncovering the molecular mechanisms. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007 Jan;8(1):57–69. doi: 10.1038/nrn2038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Peng J, Stevenson FF, Oo ML, Andersen JK. Iron-enhanced paraquat-mediated dopaminergic cell death due to increased oxidative stress as a consequence of microglial activation. Free Radic Biol Med. 2009 Jan 15;46(2):312–20. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2008.10.045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES