Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the predictive factors of radiation pneumonitis (RP) and associated changes in pulmonary function after definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Materials and Methods
Medical records of 60 patients with NSCLC who received definitive CCRT were retrospectively reviewed. Dose volumetric (DV) parameters, clinical factors, and pulmonary function test (PFT) data were analyzed. RP was graded according to the CTCAE ver. 4.0. Percentage of lung volume that received a dose of threshold (Vdose) and mean lung dose (MLD) were analyzed for potential DV predictors. PFT changes were calculated as the difference between pre-RT and post-RT values at 3, 6, and 12 months after RT.
Results
Twenty-two patients (37%) developed grade ≥2 RP. Among clinical factors, tumor location in lower lobe was associated with RP. Among the DV parameters, only MLD >15 Gy was associated with grade ≥2 RP. There were statistically significant decreases in PFT at all points compared with pre-RT values in grade ≥2 RP group. MLD was associated with forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) changes at 6 and 12 months. V10 was associated with FVC changes at 12 months. V20 and V30 were associated with FEV1 changes at 6 months and FVC changes at 12 months.
Conclusion
After definitive CCRT in patients with NSCLC, MLD >15 Gy and lower lobe tumor location were predictors of grade ≥2 RP. Pulmonary functions were decreased after CCRT and the magnitude of changes was associated with DV parameters.
Keywords: Non-small-cell lung carcinoma, Radiation pneumonitis, Dose volumetric parameter, Respiratory function test
Introduction
Radiotherapy is the major treatment modality for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Earlier studies showed superior outcome of concurrent chemoradiotherapy over sequential treatment [1,2]. In patients with unresectable tumors or medically inoperable conditions, definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) has become a standard treatment.
Radiation pneumonitis (RP) is one of the major dose-limiting toxicities in patients receiving radiotherapy for lung cancer. Higher radiation doses will improve local control rate but also increase the incidence of treatment related toxicity [3]. Although most patients with mild RP recover spontaneously, some with severe RP suffer from bothering symptoms that can lead to poor quality of life and in a few cases to death. The previously reported incidence of clinically significant RP ranges from roughly 10% to 40% of patients receiving definitive radiotherapy for lung cancer [4-8]. Clinical manifestations of RP are usually nonproductive cough, mild fever and dyspnea on exertion. Besides these non-specific symptoms, several other factors such as difference in radiation techniques and variable reporting methods can contribute to the variability of the RP incidence.
Numerous clinical factors such as age, sex, performance status, tumor location, smoking history, underlying lung disease and use of chemotherapy have been evaluated and found to be associated with RP. With the development of three-dimensional (3D) treatment systems, information about the radiation dose distribution of the organ of interest has become available. Many studies evaluated the association between dose volumetric (DV) parameters and risk of RP.
This study is aimed to evaluate the clinical and DV parameters to find out the predictive factors of RP and associated pulmonary function changes in patients with NSCLC who were treated with the definitive CCRT.
Materials and Methods
1. Patients
Between November 2003 and April 2010, seventy patients with NSCLC received definitive CCRT at our institution. Of these patients, 5 patients who were treated for symptom palliation and 4 patients who received incomplete radiotherapy were excluded. One patient who received palliative surgical resection after RT was excluded to eliminate the compounding effect of the surgery on the pulmonary function changes. The remaining 60 patients were retrospectively analyzed in this study.
Patients and tumor characteristics are shown in Table 1. Median age was 65 years (range, 43 to 84 years) and 52 patients were male. Fifty-two patients were current or former smokers. Half of the patients had underlying lung disease, and the most common was chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). All patients had histologically confirmed NSCLC with the histologic diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma most common and most patients were in stage III (93.4%). Forty patients had tumors in upper lobes including middle lobe in case of right lung cancer. A tumor involving the hilum or mediastinum was defined as a central tumor in this study and 39 patients had central tumors.
Table 1.
ECOG, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
2. Treatment
All patients were treated with curative intent, and none of the patients underwent surgical resection before and after radiotherapy. Twenty-six patients received induction chemotherapy before CCRT. Fifty-eight patients received we e k l y chemothe rapy and the median numbe r of chemotherapy cycle was 6 (range, 2 to 7). Of these patients, fifty patients received paclitaxel (50 mg/m2) and cisplatin (25 mg/m2) and four docetaxel (20 mg/m2) and cisplatin (20 mg/m2) as a concurrent chemotherapy regimen. Radiotherapy was delivered using conventional fractionation (1.8-2.0 Gy per day, 5 days per week) with median total dose 66 Gy (range, 59.4 to 70 Gy). Fifty-five patients receive 3D conformal radiotherapy but 5 patients received initial conventional 2D radiotherapy followed by 3D conformal boost and these patients were not evaluated in the analysis of dose volumetric (DV) parameters. DV parameters included in the analysis were mean lung dose (MLD), percentage of lung volume receiving a dose of 10 Gy or more (V10), 20 Gy of more (V20), 30 Gy or more (V30).
3. Pulmonary function tests
Pulmonary function tests (PFT) were obtained before RT and 3, 6, and 12 months after completion of RT. Forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) were expressed as a percentage of the normal value (based on age, weight, and gender). Changes of PFT were calculated as the difference between the pre- and post-RT PFT values relative to the pre-RT values [9].
4. Radiation pneumonitis
RP was evaluated retrospectively by reviewing the medical records and follow-up imaging of the patients. All clinical symptoms and radiographic changes were considered. RP was graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) ver. 4.0.
5. Statistical analysis
To evaluate the effect of the DV parameters on development of RP, Fisher's exact test was used. Using paired t-test, we compared the PFT parameters at 3, 6, and 12 months after completion of radiotherapy with the pre-RT values, and using independent t-test, the association between RP and PFT changes was investigated. The association between DV parameters and PFT changes were tested by correlation analysis. All statistical analysis was performed using SPSS ver. 18 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
Results
1. Prognostic factors for grade ≥2 radiation pneumonitis
Follow-up duration for patients ranged 3 to 88 months (median, 21 months). No patient developed grade ≥3 RP. Twelve patients (20.0%) did not develop RP, 26 (43.3%) developed grade 1 RP, and 22 (36.7%) grade 2 RP. The mean values of MLD, V10, V20, and V30 were 13.2 Gy, 42.4%, 25.9%, and 16.5% in the group with grade <2 RP, and 15.6 Gy, 46.2%, 29.7%, and 20.0% in the grade ≥2 RP group. Among these parameters, only the mean MLD was significantly different between two groups.
The results of univariate and multivariate analysis to find the prognostic factors for grade ≥2 RP are summarized in Table 2. In univariate analysis for development of grade ≥2 RP, lower lobe tumor and MLD >15 Gy were significant prognostic factors but in multivariate analysis, only MLD was significantly associated with the development of grade ≥2 RP (p = 0.025). Because lower lobe tumor was closely associated with MLD >15 Gy, tumor location was excluded in the multivariate analysis to remove the multicollinearity.
Table 2.
RP, radiation pneumonitis; NS, not significant.
a)Vdose, percentage of lung volume receiving more than a threshold dose. b)p-values from Fischer's exact test.
2. Pulmonary function changes and radiation pneumonitis
PFT parameters at 3, 6, and 12 months after completion of RT were compared with pre-RT value and the mean relative changes of 3 PFT parameters (FVC, FEV1, and DLCO) were compared between the group with grade ≥2 RP and with grade <2 RP. The mean values of PFT change were significantly higher in the group with grade ≥2 RP at 6 and 12 months.
The relative changes of FVC, FEV1, and DLCO are illustrated in the Fig. 1. The mean relative reduction of FVC, FEV1, and DLCO in patients with grade ≥2 were 9.7%, 15.7%, and 23.3% at 3 months, 4.6%, 17.9%, and 22.1% at 6 months, 16.7%, 24.2%, and 20.1% at 12 months after RT, respectively. In the group with grade ≥2 RP, all PFT parameters significantly decreased after RT, except FEV1 change at 3 months. In contrast, there were no significant changes of PFT in the grade <2 RP group, except DLCO change at 6 months.
3. Dose Volumetric parameters and pulmonary function changes
MLD was associated with the change of FVC and FEV1 at 6 and 12 months after RT (Table 3). V10 was associated with FVC change at 12 months and V20 and V30 were associated with FEV1 change at 6 months and FVC changes at 12 months.
Table 3.
DV, dose volumetric; PFT, pulmonary function tests; RT, radiotherapy; FVC, forced vital capacity; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; DLCO, diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide; NS, not significant.
a)Vdose, percentage of lung volume receiving more than a threshold dose. b)p-values from correlation analysis.
Discussion and Conclusion
Radiation pneumonitis is the most common toxicity after radiotherapy for thoracic tumors and can have substantial influence on the morbidity and mortality of patients with lung cancer. Therefore, it is essential to find out the predictive factors for the development of RP to reduce the incidence of RP. Many studies reported that radiation dose and irradiated lung volumes are closely associated with the risk of RP. Several DV parameters have been proposed as predictive factors for RP but still there is no consensus about which parameters are ideal for predicting the RP.
Many studies reported several clinical factors as predictive factors for development of RP [10-12]. Factors such as age, gender, pretreatment performance status, smoking history, underlying lung disease and tumor location have been proposed as predictive factors. But in this study, all clinical factors except tumor location did not show any correlation with the development of RP. One possible explanation for this result is the small sample size in this study, but we suppose the discreet use of individualized radiotherapy as another factor. If a patient is old, has chronic lung disease and therefore has poor pre-RT lung function, we tried to modify the treatment plan and restrict the DV parameters more strictly and consequently the DV parameters of the patient showed lower DV parameters than conventionally planned cases. This consideration might have compensated for the RP susceptibility of these vulnerable patients.
Many studies have suggested various DV parameters as predictive factors for RP but no consensus about the ideal parameter has been reached [6,7,13-16]. The various results are difficult to compare directly because of several reasons. First, the definition of RP and the toxicity grading systems are different among the studies. Second, the population of the patients investigated is heterogeneous. Third, the treatment technique, dose and fractionation schemes are varied. In this study, we included the patients who were treated with the radical CCRT to improve the homogeneity of the study population, and all the patients received relatively consistent radiation dose and fractionation scheme.
There was no grade ≥3 RP in this study with following possible reasons. In this study, all patients were treated with definitive CCRT and therefore the general condition of patients might be relatively better than in other studies. It might represent that the patients had the potential to tolerate the treatments and complications as well. As mentioned before, if the patient has the clinical factors predisposing to RP, we tried to modify the treatment plan to achieve favorable DV parameters as possible. This could reduce the final lung complications of the patients with poor clinical factors.
In this study, V10, V20, and V30 were not associated with the grade ≥2 RP but the MLD was significant predictive factor for grade ≥2 RP. This is comparable to the previous studies [17-19]. Wang et al. [19] reported the association between the MLD and grade ≥3 RP. They investigated 223 patients treated with definitive CCRT and the severity of pneumonitis was graded according to the CTCAE v3.0. In univariate analysis, the MLD and V5 through V65 were associated with the RP. Patients with MLD >16.5 Gy had a higher incidence of grade ≥3 RP (13% vs. 36%). In the study of Kim et al. [18], MLD showed the significant association with severe RP in multivariate analysis. They analyzed 76 patients who were treated with 3D conformal radiotherapy with curative intent. They scored the severity of RP with the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria and severe RP was defined as grade ≥3 RP. V20, V30, V40, and V50, normal tissue complication probability and MLD were associated with severe RP in univariate analysis. But in multivariate analysis, MLD ≥15 Gy was the only significant predictive factor for grade ≥3 RP.
Regarding to pulmonary function changes after CCRT, there were significant reductions in pulmonary function after radiotherapy and the change was prominent in grade ≥2 RP. Many investigators showed the decline in the PFT, and its correlation with the symptoms. Borst et al. [9] reported the change of pulmonary function in patients with long term disease free survival. At 3 months after RT, decline in the PFT were observed and that was not recovered thereafter. The change of pulmonary function was associated with the MLD. Miller et al. [20] reported similar result that showed significant reduction in PFT at 6 months after RT which continued beyond 1 year. Our study demonstrated similar results that PFT declined until 6 months and then stabilized by 1 year after radiotherapy. In addition, we separately evaluated the PFT changes according to the grade of RP. As expected, the PFT reduction was more prominent in the patients with grade ≥2 RP than the other patients. Grade of RP is relatively subjective because it depends on the patient's symptoms and the physician's assessment. But with PFT changes in this study, severity of RP could be expressed in the magnitude of PFT changes in more objective way.
Reduction in some PFT parameters was associated with the DV parameters. Because this study is basically retrospective and not all PFT parameters (FVC, FEV1, and DLCO) were checked regularly at every time, no consistent relationship was shown between PFT and DV parameters. But in spite of these limitations, we can assume the association with some DV parameters and PFT changes. Among the DV parameters, MLD was associated FVC and FEV1 at 6 and 12 months. Also it can be speculated that the DV parameters were significantly associated with the grade ≥2 RP and the PFT change was more prominent in the grade ≥2 RP. From these results, we expect the clinical guidance about the radiation pneumonitis, DV parameters, and PFT changes which need to be explored with forthcoming studies.
The development of grade ≥2 RP after definitive CCRT in NSCLC is significantly associated with the MLD >15 Gy. There was considerable reduction in pulmonary function after radiotherapy and the relative reduction is higher in the group who developed grade ≥2 RP. The mean relative reduction of FVC, FEV1, DLCO in patients with grade ≥2 were 9.7%, 15.7%, and 23.3% at 3 months, 4.6%, 17.9%, and 22.1% at 6 months, 16.7%, 24.2%, and 20.1% at 12 months after RT, respectively. The magnitude of pulmonary function change was also closely associated with the radiotherapy DV parameters.
Footnotes
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
References
- 1.Furuse K, Fukuoka M, Kawahara M, et al. Phase III study of concurrent versus sequential thoracic radiotherapy in combination with mitomycin, vindesine, and cisplatin in unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:2692–2699. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.9.2692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Curran WJ, Jr, Paulus R, Langer CJ, et al. Sequential vs. concurrent chemoradiation for stage III non-small cell lung cancer: randomized phase III trial RTOG 9410. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103:1452–1460. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Perez CA, Stanley K, Grundy G, et al. Impact of irradiation technique and tumor extent in tumor control and survival of patients with unresectable non-oat cell carcinoma of the lung: report by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Cancer. 1982;50:1091–1099. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19820915)50:6<1091::aid-cncr2820500612>3.0.co;2-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yorke ED, Jackson A, Rosenzweig KE, et al. Dose-volume factors contributing to the incidence of radiation pneumonitis in non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;54:329–339. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)02929-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kwa SL, Theuws JC, Wagenaar A, et al. Evaluation of two dose-volume histogram reduction models for the prediction of radiation pneumonitis. Radiother Oncol. 1998;48:61–69. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(98)00020-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Graham MV, Purdy JA, Emami B, et al. Clinical dose-volume histogram analysis for pneumonitis after 3D treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;45:323–329. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(99)00183-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tsujino K, Hirota S, Endo M, et al. Predictive value of dose-volume histogram parameters for predicting radiation pneumonitis after concurrent chemoradiation for lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;55:110–115. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)03807-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Rancati T, Ceresoli GL, Gagliardi G, Schipani S, Cattaneo GM. Factors predicting radiation pneumonitis in lung cancer patients: a retrospective study. Radiother Oncol. 2003;67:275–283. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(03)00119-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Borst GR, De Jaeger K, Belderbos JS, Burgers SA, Lebesque JV. Pulmonary function changes after radiotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer patients with long-term disease-free survival. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;62:639–644. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.11.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Claude L, Perol D, Ginestet C, et al. A prospective study on radiation pneumonitis following conformal radiation therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer: clinical and dosimetric factors analysis. Radiother Oncol. 2004;71:175–181. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2004.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Shi A, Zhu G, Wu H, Yu R, Li F, Xu B. Analysis of clinical and dosimetric factors associated with severe acute radiation pneumonitis in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with concurrent chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol. 2010;5:35. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-5-35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Robnett TJ, Machtay M, Vines EF, McKenna MG, Algazy KM, McKenna WG. Factors predicting severe radiation pneumonitis in patients receiving definitive chemoradiation for lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;48:89–94. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(00)00648-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Dang J, Li G, Lu X, Yao L, Zhang S, Yu Z. Analysis of related factors associated with radiation pneumonitis in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2010;136:1169–1178. doi: 10.1007/s00432-010-0764-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mehta V. Radiation pneumonitis and pulmonary fibrosis in non-small-cell lung cancer: pulmonary function, prediction, and prevention. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;63:5–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.03.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yamada M, Kudoh S, Hirata K, Nakajima T, Yoshikawa J. Risk factors of pneumonitis following chemoradiotherapy for lung cancer. Eur J Cancer. 1998;34:71–75. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(97)00377-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rodrigues G, Lock M, D'Souza D, Yu E, Van Dyk J. Prediction of radiation pneumonitis by dose - volume histogram parameters in lung cancer: a systematic review. Radiother Oncol. 2004;71:127–138. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2004.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kwa SL, Lebesque JV, Theuws JC, et al. Radiation pneumonitis as a function of mean lung dose: an analysis of pooled data of 540 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998;42:1–9. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00196-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kim TH, Cho KH, Pyo HR, et al. Dose-volumetric parameters for predicting severe radiation pneumonitis after three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy for lung cancer. Radiology. 2005;235:208–215. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2351040248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wang S, Liao Z, Wei X, et al. Analysis of clinical and dosimetric factors associated with treatment-related pneumonitis (TRP) in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with concurrent chemotherapy and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;66:1399–1407. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.07.1337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Miller KL, Zhou SM, Barrier RC, Jr, et al. Long-term changes in pulmonary function tests after definitive radiotherapy for lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;56:611–615. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(03)00182-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]