Summary
Introduction
Secondary FVIII prophylaxis converts severe hemophiliacs (FVIII:C < 1 IU dL−1) to a moderate phenotype (FVIII:C ≥ 1 IU dL−1), however, plasma FVIII:C is a poor predictor of bleeding risk.
Aim
To study the use of thromboelastography (TEG) and thrombin generation assay (TGA) to quantify coagulation across a 48 hour rFVIII prophylaxis period.
Methods
10 severe hemophiliacs with varying clinical bleeding phenotypes received their standard rFVIII prophylaxis dose and blood samples were obtained over 48 hours. Measured parameters included FVIII:C, TEG, and TGA at each time point. FVIII:C pharmacokinetics (PK) and correlation between global assay parameters was performed.
Results
The FVIII:C PK parameters were consistent with previous literature. There was significant correlation between FVIII:C and TEG R-time and aPTT (both p<0.001). Significant correlations existed between FVIII:C and TGA peak, ETP and velocity parameters (all p<0.001). At 24 hours the TEG parameters were sub-therapeutic despite median FVIII:C of 13.0 IU dL−1. TGA was sensitive to FVIII:C below 1 IU dL−1. Those with the severest bleeding phenotype had the lowest TGA parameters.
Conclusion
There was significant correlation between FVIII:C and TEG and TGA. TEG lost sensitivity at 48 hours, but not TGA. Prospective studies are needed to determine whether these data can be used to design individualized rFVIII prophylaxis regimens.
Keywords: hemophilia A, TEG, thrombin generation assay, rFVIII prophylaxis
Introduction
Despite prophylactic FVIII treatment in severe hemophiliacs, there remains wide inter-patient variability in clinical bleeding phenotype. For instance, many severe hemophiliacs with trough FVIII levels ≥ 1 IU dL−1 frequently exhibit severe breakthrough bleeding; conversely, others rarely bleed even though their trough FVIII:C is <1 IU dL−1. As such, plasma FVIII:C has been shown to be a poor predictor of preventing arthropathy [1]. This suggests that simply following the FVIII level to make clinical judgments regarding bleeding risk provides an incomplete picture. One potential explanation for this discrepancy is that the current monitoring parameters (e.g., FVIII:C and activated partial thromboplastin time (PTT)) are measured in the plasma matrix, which does not consider the critical contributions of platelets and tissue factor bearing cells to the coagulation processes. This is particularly important given the recognized cell based model of coagulation [2]. Therefore, the inherent variability in clinical efficacy suggests that the FVIII plasma level is best interpreted within the context of its pharmacodynamic effect on whole blood coagulation, platelet function and thrombin generation.
While there have been many elegant FVIII pharmacokinetic (PK) studies [3–12] comparatively few have assessed the FVIII level in relation to global coagulation measures. There is keen interest by the National Institutes of Health [13] and the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis Scientific and Standardization Committee, to develop sensitive and specific laboratory monitoring parameters for hemophilia care. These include thromboelastography (TEG) and the thrombin generation assay (TGA) among others [14,15]. The use of these global measures of hemostasis appear to be complementary to the more traditional plasma based markers FVIII:C and aPTT.
The aim of the current study was to assess traditional and global measures of hemostasis across a 48-hour time period in severe FVIII deficiency patients receiving chronic rFVIII prophylaxis. These data could potentially be used in the future for personalized prophylaxis.
Materials and methods
Patients and study procedures
The Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) Institutional Review Board approved this study, and it was conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Following written informed consent, 10 subjects > 18 years of age with severe FVIII deficiency without inhibitor antibodies were enrolled into this study. All participants were otherwise healthy, in a non-bleeding state and receiving prophylactic recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) therapy every two or three days. Participants were excluded if they reported factor replacement therapy within the previous 72 hours before study entry; had active bleeding; or had a medical- or family history of thrombosis. Demographics, medical history, bleeding phenotype and factor deficiency information were recorded for each participant. A severe bleeding phenotype was defined as having 1 or more bleeding episodes per month despite FVIII prophylaxis; mild bleeding was defined as 1 bleeding episode or less per year; and the moderate bleeding phenotype was considered between these two extremes.
Participants meeting eligibility criteria underwent a 48-hour FVIII dosing study using their regularly prescribed prophylaxis rFVIII dose administered by intravenous bolus over five minutes. Blood specimens were collected into 3.2% sodium citrate evacuated containers immediately before the FVIII dose, and then at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 hours post-dose for the determination of FVIII:C, TEG and TGA analysis.
Assay Procedures
FVIII:C was determined using the one-stage clotting assay [16]. Thromboelastography was conducted on whole blood samples using the TEG® 5000 Hemostasis Analyzer (Haemoscope Corp., Niles, IL, USA) using kaolin, buffered stabilizers and phospholipids per manufacturer’s instructions [17]. The reported values included the reaction time (R-time), kinetics time (K-time) and maximal amplitude (MA). The reference ranges for R, K and MA are 3–8 min, 1–3 min, and 51–69 mm, respectively [18].
Kinetics of thrombin generation was assessed in platelet poor plasma (PPP) by measuring the cleavage of the fluorogenic substrate Z-Gly-Gly-Arg-AMC according to the methods described by Hemker [19]. Low concentration tissue factor (PPP reagent-LOW, Thrombinoscope BV, Masstricht, The Netherlands) and PPP were pipetted in triplicate into 96-well round-bottom microtiter plates (Immulon 2HB plate; Diagnostica Stago, Parsippany, NJ, USA). The final concentration of tissue factor was 1 pMol L−1. Thrombin generation was calculated using the Calibrated Automated Thrombogram software version v3.0.0.26 (CAT; Thrombinoscope BV, Masstricht, The Netherlands). Thrombin generation lag time (T-lag), peak thrombin concentration (Cmax), endogenous thrombin potential (ETP), and the velocity of thrombin generation were reported.
Pharmacokinetic Analysis
Non-compartmental PK analysis was performed on each individual profile to estimate maximal FVIII:C activity (Cmax), time to maximal activity (Tmax), terminal half-life (t1/2), total body clearance (CLtot), mean residence time (MRT) and volume of distribution at steady-state (Vdss).
Statistical Analysis
Descriptive statistics were used when appropriate. When necessary, data were log-transformed to comply with the assumptions of normality. The relationship between variables was summarized using Pearson’s correlation if the relationship was linear. When the relationship was linear on the log scale the correlation was calculated from the log-transformed values. The level of significance was pre-specified at p<0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using JMP® Pro version 10.0.0 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).
Results
Ten severe FVIII deficient patients without inhibitory antibodies completed this study (Table 1). All subjects were receiving long-term rFVIII prophylaxis therapy. Five subjects had a moderate or severe clinical bleeding phenotype. The mean FVIII dose was 32.1 IU kg−1 (range 21.4 to 54.4 IU kg−1); the highest dose was used in the patient with the severest bleeding history. Table 2 shows the median (range) clotting parameters following rFVIII dosing through the 48-hour dosing period. The mean (S.D.) PK of FVIII:C included Cmax 80 (29.8) IU dl−1, CLtot 2.9 (1.1) mL h−1 kg−1; t1/2 11.3 (5.9) hours, and MRT 15.9 (7.8) hours.
Table 1.
Subject Demographics
| Subject | Bleeding Phenotype | Ethnicity | Age (yrs) | PLT Count (x 109 mL−1) | Plasma Fibrinogen (mg/dL) | Weight (kg) | Product | Weekly Doses | rFVIII Dose (IU) | rFVIII Dose (IU/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mild | AA | 62 | 199 | 328 | 107 | Kogenate FS | Two | 2,300 | 21.4 |
| 2 | Mild | Cauc | 59 | 261 | 264 | 72 | Kogenate FS | Three | 2,058 | 28.7 |
| 3 | Mild | Asian | 33 | 274 | 313 | 69 | Helixate FS | Three | 1,628 | 23.4 |
| 4 | Severe | Cauc | 46 | 273 | 289 | 83 | Advate | Two | 1,973 | 24.4 |
| 5 | Severe | Cauc | 20 | 230 | 301 | 64 | Helixate FS | Two | 2,400 | 36.3 |
| 6 | Moderate | Cauc | 60 | 323 | 441 | 61 | Recombinate | Two | 1,560 | 25.6 |
| 7 | Severe | Cauc | 27 | 403 | 355 | 81 | Kogenate FS | Two | 4,464 | 54.4 |
| 8 | Mild | Cauc | 28 | 177 | 367 | 86 | Recombinate | Two | 3,520 | 40.9 |
| 9 | Mild | AA | 40 | 204 | 356 | 88 | Kogenate FS | Two | 3,000 | 34.1 |
| 10 | Severe | Cauc | 23 | 197 | 214 | 75 | Advate | Three | 2,200 | 29.3 |
|
| ||||||||||
| Mean | 39.8 | 254.1 | 322.8 | 78.7 | 2,510 | 32.1 | ||||
| S.D. | 16.1 | 69.2 | 62.4 | 13.5 | 907 | 10.0 | ||||
AA - African American; Cauc - Caucasian; PLT - platelet
Table 2.
Median (range) coagulation parameters from Time 0 to 48 hours
| Time Following rFVIII Dosing (h) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||||
| Parameter | 0 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 24 | 48 |
| Plasma FVIII:C (IU dL−1) | <1 | 91.0 (54–152) | 76.0) (48–140) | 65.0 (39–106) | 58.5 (39–88) | 40.5 (24–53) | 27.5 (19–40) | 13.0 (8–32) | 1.0 (<1–16) |
| aPTT (sec) | 58.5 (42–73) | 31.5 (27–36) | 32 (26–37) | 32.0 (26–39) | 33.0 (30–37) | 34.5 (32–40) | 36.0 (34–41) | 41.0 (37–48) | 51.5 (42–65) |
| R (min) | 24.1 (9.8–37) | 6.6 (3.4–11.1) | 6.0 (3.8–9.6) | 6.5 (3.9–12.5) | 6.9 (4.6–10.5) | 8.6 (6.8–13.6) | 8.1 (6–11.3) | 12.0 (6.2–18.9) | 17.6 (12.3–29.5) |
| K (min) | 5.5 (2.5–18.6) | 1.9 (1.4–3.3) | 2.1 (1.1–3.1) | 1.8 (1.2–4.0) | 2.2 (1.5–3.5)) | 2.5 (1.8–3.4) | 2.3 (1.4–3.8) | 3.1 (2.2–5.0) | 4.4 (3.4–8.9) |
| MA (mm) | 52.8 (44.4–63.5) | 62.1 (56.1–67.3) | 61.4 (58.2–62.6) | 61.6 (52.6–68.0) | 60.7 (52.6–68.0) | 59.1 (52.7–67.1) | 61.7 (51.0–71.4) | 58.3 (54.0–64.3) | 53.2 (47.1–60.3) |
There were significant curvilinear relationships between FVIII:C and log-R time and log-aPTT (r = −0.81 and r = −0.84, p<0.001, respectively, Figures 1a and b. A weaker correlation was noted between FVIII:C and MA (r = 0.56, p<0.001), however the trend was difficult to interpret as all MA values were in the normal range irrespective of FVIII:C activity.
Figure 1. Correlation between FVIII:C, R and aPTT.
Correlation between FVIII:C and R (Panel a, r = −0.81, p < 0.001) and FVIII:C and aPTT (Panel b, r = −0.84, p < 0.001)
The median (range) baseline peak thrombin concentration in the study population was 91.5 nM (19–247), while the baseline ETP was 1114.0 nM min−1 (382.0–1805.0, Figures 2a and b). There was a significant correlation between log FVIII:C and log peak thrombin (r=0.51, p<0.001). Maximal median peak thrombin generation (330.5 nM) and ETP (median 1533.0 nMol min−1) were achieved 30 minutes post-rFVIII dose and trended downward with FVIII:C clearance. Both peak thrombin and ETP returned to its baseline at 48 hours. Patients with a severe bleeding phenotype had the lowest baseline and 48-hour thrombin generation and ETP measurements, respectively. There was strong correlation (r = 0.90) between log FVIII:C and log thrombin generation velocity (Figures 3a and b), however there was inter-individual variability; patients #2 and #10 had markedly lower slopes and correspondingly lower correlations (r=0.31 and r = 0.65, respectively).
Fig. 2.
TGA parameters in PPP following rFVIII prophylaxis
Figure 3. Correlation between thrombin velocity and FVIII:C.
Correlation between log FVIII:C and log thrombin generation velocity (panel a, r = 0.90, p < 0.001) and individual patient correlation plots (panel b).
Discussion
Hemophilia is by definition a disease of lack of thrombin generation, due to the inability to form the tenase and prothrombinase complexes during the amplification phase of coagulation. Deficient prothrombinase activity prevents the thrombin burst necessary for platelet activation and fibrin formation. Therefore, assays that can quantify and characterize not only thrombin generation but also whole blood viscoelasticity would be ideal to provide a complete picture of a patient’s hemostatic response to factor therapy.
In this study, the PK of FVIII:C was consistent with previously published literature [3–14]. Following rFVIII dosing, the peak global response occurred at 30–60 minutes, and all measures returned to baseline by 48 hours. However, as early as 24 hours, the median TEG parameters R and K parameters fell below their target range, despite the median FVIII:C level of 13.0 IU dl−1. Thus, these patients went another 24 hours with sub-therapeutic viscoelastic parameters until the completion of the study. Correspondingly, although the 48-hour median FVIII:C was 1.0 IU dl−1 (the current goal trough level for prophylaxis), the blood viscoelasticity was virtually absent. This may be representative of the fact that TEG is activated under non-physiological conditions and is consequently insensitive to very low FVIII concentrations. Sorensen and colleagues have previously shown the TEG to be a useful monitor of recombinant activated factor VIIa and FVIII substitution [20–22], however, these studies did not assess TEG readings at the trough period.
On the contrary, similar to previous data [23–25] the TGA parameters ETP, thrombin peak and velocity were sensitive to FVIII:C below 1 IU dl−1. There was variability in the individual subjects’ TGA profile, which has been shown previously in healthy volunteers [26] and those with FVIII deficiency [24,25,27]. Our findings may be reflective of normal variance in patient thrombin generation profile, and/or the patient’s rFVIII PK disposition. While the relatively small sample size in this single center pilot study precludes any statistical comparisons between patients with different bleeding phenotypes, it does shed light on the relevant question “was there a difference in TGA measures in patients with severe bleeding phenotypes, particularly at the 48 hour time point?” Patients with the severest bleeding phenotype had the lowest baseline and 48-hour TGA parameters. For example, patient #7, who had the severest bleeding history (59 documented bleeds and 118 rFVIII infusions in 2009), had baseline thrombin generation, ETP and time to peak thrombin (TTP) of 26 nM, 400 nM min−1, and 16.3 min, respectively. At 48 hours, these parameters were 21 nM, 237 nM min−1 and 16.0 min, respectively. On the other hand, patient #1, who experiences infrequent breakthrough bleeding events, had baseline thrombin generation, ETP and TTP of 103 nM, 1593 nM min−1, and 17.3 min, respectively; at 48 hours these parameters were 177 nM, 1654 nM min−1 and 13.4 min, respectively. Previous data have shown an association between clinical bleeding phenotype and TGA parameters in patients with hemophilia [23,28–30].
Taken as a whole, these data lend support to the opinion that achieving a trough FVIII:C level of 1 IU dL−1 is not appropriate for all severe hemophilia A patients. A recent study evaluated the frequency of joint bleeding as a function of FVIII activity [31]. The results showed that for those patients with FVIII:C of 1 IU dL−1, the mean number of joint bleeds was 6 per year; for those with a level of 5 IU dL−1 the number of bleeds dropped to approximately two per year; and 10–15 IU dL−1 completely prevented joint bleeds. Our data may corroborate these findings. Indeed, at the 24-hour time point in the current study, the median FVIII:C was 13.1IU dL−1, which corresponded to near normal TEG and TGA readings. While achieving these trough levels would not be appropriate for all patients, those with a severe bleeding phenotype and active lifestyle may benefit from a more personalized pharmacotherapy approach.
This study has limitations that deserve comment. First, this was a relatively small pilot study; however it provides important preliminary data from which to design larger multi-centered personalized prophylaxis studies. Second, we studied the TGA in PPP without the use of corn trypsin inhibitor (CTI) to block the intrinsic pathway. While there is a body of literature supporting the use of CTI, when the present study began there were no formal standardized procedures for TGA. Nonetheless, our TGA data compared favorably to other studies that used PPP with and without CTI [23,24,27]. We believe these data to be representative given a previous study suggested that the influence of intrinsic pathway activation is minimal when TF concentrations are ≥ 0.5 pM [32].
Conclusion
In conclusion, we studied global hemostasis parameters using TEG and TGA across a 48 hour rFVIII prophylaxis dosing period. There was correlation between FVIII:C and TEG parameters, but sensitivity was lost at 48 hours. TGA maintained sensitivity across the entire period, but showed variability. Those with the most severe bleeding phenotypes had the lowest thrombin generation and ETP parameters. Further studies are needed to determine whether these collective data can be used to design individualized rFVIII prophylaxis regimens based on clinical bleeding phenotype.
Acknowledgments
This study was funded through the Virginia Commonwealth University A.D. Williams Intramural Grant Fund, and was conducted with support from General Clinical Research Center Grant M01 RR00065, NCR, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. These data were presented in part at the XXX International Congress of the World Federation of Hemophilia, July 9, 2012, Paris, France.
Footnotes
Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest: Nothing to Disclose
Author Contributions
Research Study Design (MA, DFB)
Performed the Research (MA, EJM, JCB, MEN, JGK, DFB)
Data Analysis (DFB, MA, EJM, JV)
Wrote Paper (EFB, EJM)
References
- 1.Ahnström J, Berntorp E, Lindvall K, Björkman S. A 6-year follow-up of dosing, coagulation factor levels and bleedings in relation to joint status in the prophylactic treatment of haemophilia. Haemophilia. 2004;10:689–97. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2004.01036.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hoffman M, Monroe DM. A cell-based model of hemostasis. Thromb Haemost. 2001;85:958–65. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Björkman S. Prophylactic dosing of factor VIII and IX from a clinical pharmacokinetic perspective. Haemophilia. 2003;9(Suppl 1):101–8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2516.9.s1.4.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Collins PW, Fischer K, Morfini M, Blanchette VS, Björkman S. Implications of coagulation factor VIII and IX pharmacokinetics in the prophylactic treatment of haemophilia. Haemophilia. 2011;17:2–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2010.02370.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Collins PW, Björkman S, Fischer K, Blanchette VS, Oh M, Schroth P, et al. Factor VIII requirement to maintain a target plasma level in the prophylactic treatment of severe hemophilia A: influences of variance in pharmacokinetics and treatment regimens. J Thromb Haemost. 2009;8:269–75. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03703.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Valentino LA, Mamonov V, Hellmann A, Quon DV, Chybicka A, Schroth P, et al. A randomized comparison of two prophylaxis regimens and a paired comparison of on-demand and prophylaxis treatments in hemophilia A management. J Thromb Haemost. 2012;10:359–67. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04611.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Björkman S, Oh M, Spotts G, Schroth P, Fritsch S, Ewenstein BM, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of recombinant factor VIII: the relationships of pharmacokinetics to age and body weight. Blood. 2012;119:612–18. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-07-360594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lee M, Morfinia M, Negrier C, Chamomaurd V. The pharmacokinetics of coagulation factors. Haemophilia. 2006;12(Suppl 3):1–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2006.01253.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Shapiro AD, Korth-Bradley J, Poon MC. Use of pharmacokinetics in the coagulation factor treatment of patients with haemophilia. Haemophilia. 2005;11:571–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2005.01149.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Björkman S, Berntorp E. Pharmacokinetics of coagulation factors: clinical relevance for patients with haemophilia. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2001;40:815–32. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200140110-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Björkman S, Carlsson M. The pharmacokinetics of factor VIII and factor IX: methodology, pitfalls and applications. Haemophilia. 1997;3:1–8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2516.1997.00074.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Collins PW, Blanchette VS, Fischer K, Björkman S, Oh M, Fritsch S, et al. Breakthrough bleeding in relation to predicted factor VIII levels in patients receiving prophylactic treatment for severe haemophilia A. J Thromb Haemost. 2009;7:413–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2008.03270.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.NHLBI Working Group. [Accessed September 1, 2012];Can Global Assays Address Current and Future Challenges in Therapeutic Monitoring of Hemophilia A? http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/meetings/workshops/globalassays.htm.
- 14.Shima M, Matsumota T, Ogiwara K. New assays for monitoring haemophilia treatment. Haemophilia. 2008;14(Suppl 3):83–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2008.01737.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nair SC, Dargaud Y, Chitlur M, Srivastava A. Tests of global hemostasis and their application in bleeding disorders. Haemophilia. 2010;16(Suppl 5):85–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2010.02304.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Over J. Methodology of the one-stage assay for factor VIII (FVIII:C) Scand J Haematol. 1984;33(Suppl 41):13–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.1984.tb02764.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Haemoscope™ (Internet). (place unknown); c1998–2007. [Accessed September 1, 2012]; Available from http://www.haemoscope.com.
- 18.Scarpelini S, Rhind SG, Nascimento B, Tien H, Shek PN, Peng HT, Huang H, et al. Normal range values for thromboelastography in healthy adult volunteers. Brazilian J Med and Biological Research. 2009;42:1210–17. doi: 10.1590/s0100-879x2009001200015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hemker HC, Giesen P, Al Dieri R, Regnault V, de Smedt E, Wagenvoord R, et al. Calibrated automated thrombin generation measurement in clotting plasma. Pathophysiol Haemost Thromb. 2003;33:4–14. doi: 10.1159/000071636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sorensen B, Ingerslev J. Tailoring haemostatic treatment to patient requirements – an update on monitoring haemostatic response using thromboelastography. Haemophilia. 2005;11(Suppl 1):1–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2005.01156.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sorensen B, Ingerslev J. Thromboelastography and recombinant factor VIIa – haemophilia and beyong. Semin Hematol. 2004;41:140–4. doi: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2003.11.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ingerslev J, Poulsen LH, Sorensen B. Potential role of the dynamic properties of whole blood coagulation in assessment of dosage requirements in haemophilia. Haemophilia. 2003;9:348–52. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2516.2003.00767.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Dargaud Y, Beguin S, Lienhart A, Al Dieri R, Trzeciak C, Bordet JC, et al. Evaluation of thrombin generating capacity in plasma from patients with haemophilia A and B. Thromb Haemost. 2005;96:562–7. doi: 10.1160/TH04-10-0706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.van Veen JJ, Gatt A, Cooper PC, Kitchen S, Bowyer AE, Makris M. Corn trypsin inhibitor in fluorogenic thrombin generation measurements is only necessary at low tissue factor concentrations and influences the relationship between factor VIII coagulant activity and thrombogram parameters. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2008;19:183–9. doi: 10.1097/MBC.0b013e3282f4bb47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.van Veen JJ, Gatt A, Bowyer AE, Cooper PC, Kitchen S, Makris M. Calibrated automated thrombin generation and modified thromboelastometry in haemophilia A. Thromb Research. 2009;123:895–901. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2008.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Mann KG, Brummel-Ziedins K, Undas A, Butenas S. Does the genotype predict phenotype? Evaluations of hemostatic proteome. J Thromb Haemost. 2004;2:1727–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2004.00958.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lewis SJ, Stephens E, Florou G, Macartney NJ, Hathaway LS, Knipping J, Collins PW. Measurement of global haemostasis in severe haemophilia A following factor VIII infusion. Br J Haematol. 2007;138:775–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2007.06722.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Santagostino E, Mancuso ME, Tripodi A, Chantarangkul V, Clerici M, Garagiola I, Mannucci PM. Severe hemophilia with mild bleeding phenotype: molecular characterization and global coagulation profile. J Thromb Haemost. 2010;8:737–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.03767.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Beltran-Miranda CP, Khan A, Jaloma-Cruz AR, Laffan MA. Thrombin generation and phenotypic correlation in haemophilia A. Haemophilia. 2005;11:326–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2005.01107.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ay Y, Balkan C, Karapinar M, Akin M, Bilenoglu B, Kavakli K. Feasibility of using thrombin generation assay (TGA) for monitoring of haemostasis during supplementation therapy in haemophilic patients without inhibitors. Haemophilia. 2012;18:911–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2012.02849.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Den Uijl IEM, Mauser Bunschoten EP, Roosendaal G, Schutgens RE, Biesma DH, Grobbee DE, Fischer K. Clinical severity of haemophilia A: does the classification of the 1950s still stand? Haemophilia. 2011;17:849–853. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2011.02539.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Spronk HM, Dielis AW, Panova-Noeva M, van Oerle R, Grovers-Riemslag JW, Hamulyak K, et al. Monitoring thrombin generation: is corn trypsin inhibitor needed? Thromb Haemost. 2009;101:1156–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



