Skip to main content
Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 1989 Nov;9(11):4862–4871. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.11.4862

Degradation of linear DNA by a strand-specific exonuclease activity in Xenopus laevis oocytes.

E Maryon 1, D Carroll 1
PMCID: PMC363636  PMID: 2601699

Abstract

Linear DNA injected into Xenopus laevis oocyte nuclei recombines with high efficiency if homologous sequences are present at overlapping molecular ends. We found that injected linear DNA was degraded by a 5'----3' strand-specific exonuclease activity during incubation in the oocyte nucleus to leave a heterogeneous population of 3'-tailed molecules. Decreasing the concentration of DNA injected increased the heterogeneity and the average rate of degradation. The 3' tails created were relatively stable; among molecules persisting after overnight incubation, many had 3' tails intact to within 10 bases of the original ends. DNA molecules that were efficient substrates for homologous recombination in oocytes were also partially degraded, leaving 3' tails. We found no evidence for other potent nuclease activities. If molecules with recessed 3'-OH ends were injected, endogenous polymerase efficiently resynthesized complementary strands before degradation of the 5' tails occurred. 3'-tailed molecules are plausible intermediates in the initiation of homologous recombination events in Xenopus oocyte nuclei.

Full text

PDF
4862

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Burgers P. M., Bauer G. A., Tam L. Exonuclease V from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. A 5'----3'-deoxyribonuclease that produces dinucleotides in a sequential fashion. J Biol Chem. 1988 Jun 15;263(17):8099–8105. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Carroll D. Genetic recombination of bacteriophage lambda DNAs in Xenopus oocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Nov;80(22):6902–6906. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.22.6902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Carroll D., Wright S. H., Wolff R. K., Grzesiuk E., Maryon E. B. Efficient homologous recombination of linear DNA substrates after injection into Xenopus laevis oocytes. Mol Cell Biol. 1986 Jun;6(6):2053–2061. doi: 10.1128/mcb.6.6.2053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Church G. M., Gilbert W. Genomic sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Apr;81(7):1991–1995. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.7.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Clewell D. B., Helinski D. R. Supercoiled circular DNA-protein complex in Escherichia coli: purification and induced conversion to an opern circular DNA form. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1969 Apr;62(4):1159–1166. doi: 10.1073/pnas.62.4.1159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cortese R., Harland R., Melton D. Transcription of tRNA genes in vivo: single-stranded compared to double-stranded templates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Jul;77(7):4147–4151. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.7.4147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Craigie R., Mizuuchi K. Mechanism of transposition of bacteriophage Mu: structure of a transposition intermediate. Cell. 1985 Jul;41(3):867–876. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(85)80067-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Doherty M. J., Morrison P. T., Kolodner R. Genetic recombination of bacterial plasmid DNA. Physical and genetic analysis of the products of plasmid recombination in Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 1983 Jul 5;167(3):539–560. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(83)80097-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dumont J. N. Oogenesis in Xenopus laevis (Daudin). I. Stages of oocyte development in laboratory maintained animals. J Morphol. 1972 Feb;136(2):153–179. doi: 10.1002/jmor.1051360203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Feinberg A. P., Vogelstein B. A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity. Anal Biochem. 1983 Jul 1;132(1):6–13. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(83)90418-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ganea D., Moore P., Chekuri L., Kucherlapati R. Characterization of an ATP-dependent DNA strand transferase from human cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1987 Sep;7(9):3124–3130. doi: 10.1128/mcb.7.9.3124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Grzesiuk E., Carroll D. Recombination of DNAs in Xenopus oocytes based on short homologous overlaps. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987 Feb 11;15(3):971–985. doi: 10.1093/nar/15.3.971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gurdon J. B., Melton D. A. Gene transfer in amphibian eggs and oocytes. Annu Rev Genet. 1981;15:189–218. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.15.120181.001201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Haber J. E., Borts R. H., Connolly B., Lichten M., Rudin N., White C. I. Physical monitoring of meiotic and mitotic recombination in yeast. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 1988;35:209–259. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hsieh P., Meyn M. S., Camerini-Otero R. D. Partial purification and characterization of a recombinase from human cells. Cell. 1986 Mar 28;44(6):885–894. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90011-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kmiec E. B., Holloman W. K. Heteroduplex formation and polarity during strand transfer promoted by Ustilago rec 1 protein. Cell. 1983 Jul;33(3):857–864. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90028-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kolodner R., Evans D. H., Morrison P. T. Purification and characterization of an activity from Saccharomyces cerevisiae that catalyzes homologous pairing and strand exchange. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Aug;84(16):5560–5564. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.16.5560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Laskey R. A., Harland R. M., Méchali M. Induction of chromosome replication during maturation of amphibian oocytes. Ciba Found Symp. 1983;98:25–43. doi: 10.1002/9780470720790.ch3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Legerski R. J., Penkala J. E., Peterson C. A., Wright D. A. Repair of UV-induced lesions in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Mol Cell Biol. 1987 Dec;7(12):4317–4323. doi: 10.1128/mcb.7.12.4317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lin F. L., Sperle K., Sternberg N. Model for homologous recombination during transfer of DNA into mouse L cells: role for DNA ends in the recombination process. Mol Cell Biol. 1984 Jun;4(6):1020–1034. doi: 10.1128/mcb.4.6.1020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. McCarthy J. G., Sander M., Lowenhaupt K., Rich A. Sensitive homologous recombination strand-transfer assay: partial purification of a Drosophila melanogaster enzyme and detection of sequence effects on the strand-transfer activity of RecA protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Aug;85(16):5854–5858. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.16.5854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mertz J. E. Linear DNA does not form chromatin containing regularly spaced nucleosomes. Mol Cell Biol. 1982 Dec;2(12):1608–1618. doi: 10.1128/mcb.2.12.1608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Miller T. J., Mertz J. E. Template structural requirements for transcription in vivo by RNA polymerase II. Mol Cell Biol. 1982 Dec;2(12):1595–1607. doi: 10.1128/mcb.2.12.1595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Pfeiffer P., Vielmetter W. Joining of nonhomologous DNA double strand breaks in vitro. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Feb 11;16(3):907–924. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.3.907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Randahl H., Elliott G. C., Linn S. DNA-repair reactions by purified HeLa DNA polymerases and exonucleases. J Biol Chem. 1988 Sep 5;263(25):12228–12234. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Resnick M. A. The repair of double-strand breaks in DNA; a model involving recombination. J Theor Biol. 1976 Jun;59(1):97–106. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(76)80025-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ryoji M., Worcel A. Chromatin assembly in Xenopus oocytes: in vivo studies. Cell. 1984 May;37(1):21–32. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90297-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Stahl F. W. Roles of double-strand breaks in generalized genetic recombination. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 1986;33:169–194. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6603(08)60023-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Stephens D. L., Miller T. J., Silver L., Zipser D., Mertz J. E. Easy-to-use equipment for the accurate microinjection of nanoliter volumes into the nuclei of amphibian oocytes. Anal Biochem. 1981 Jul 1;114(2):299–309. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(81)90485-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sun H., Treco D., Schultes N. P., Szostak J. W. Double-strand breaks at an initiation site for meiotic gene conversion. Nature. 1989 Mar 2;338(6210):87–90. doi: 10.1038/338087a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sutcliffe J. G. Complete nucleotide sequence of the Escherichia coli plasmid pBR322. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1979;43(Pt 1):77–90. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1979.043.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Szostak J. W., Orr-Weaver T. L., Rothstein R. J., Stahl F. W. The double-strand-break repair model for recombination. Cell. 1983 May;33(1):25–35. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90331-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Thaler D. S., Stahl F. W. DNA double-chain breaks in recombination of phage lambda and of yeast. Annu Rev Genet. 1988;22:169–197. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.22.120188.001125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Wallace R. A., Jared D. W., Dumont J. N., Sega M. W. Protein incorporation by isolated amphibian oocytes. 3. Optimum incubation conditions. J Exp Zool. 1973 Jun;184(3):321–333. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401840305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Wu A. M., Kahn R., DasGupta C., Radding C. M. Formation of nascent heteroduplex structures by RecA protein and DNA. Cell. 1982 Aug;30(1):37–44. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90009-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Wyllie A. H., Laskey R. A., Finch J., Gurdon J. B. Selective DNA conservation and chromatin assembly after injection of SV40 DNA into Xenopus oocytes. Dev Biol. 1978 May;64(1):178–188. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(78)90069-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES