Abstract
Thermochemical processing methods such as pyrolysis are of growing interest as a means of converting biomass into fuels and commodity chemicals in a sustainable manner. Macroalgae, or seaweed, represent a novel class of feedstock for pyrolysis that, owing to the nature of the environments in which they grow coupled with their biochemistry, naturally possess high metal contents. Although the impact of metals upon the pyrolysis of terrestrial biomass is well documented, their influence on the thermochemical conversion of marine-derived feeds is largely unknown. Furthermore, these effects are inherently difficult to study, owing to the heterogeneous character of natural seaweed samples. The work described in this paper uses copper(II) alginate, together with alginic acid and sodium alginate as model compounds for exploring the effects of metals upon macroalgae thermolysis. A thermogravimetric analysis–Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic study revealed that, unusually, Cu2+ ions promote the onset of pyrolysis in the alginate polymer, with copper(II) alginate initiating rapid devolatilization at 143°C, 14°C lower than alginic acid and 61°C below the equivalent point for sodium alginate. Moreover, this effect was mirrored in a sample of wild Laminaria digitata that had been doped with Cu2+ ions prior to pyrolysis, thus validating the use of alginates as model compounds with which to study the thermolysis of macroalgae. These observations indicate the varying impact of different metal species on thermochemical behaviour of seaweeds and offer an insight into the pyrolysis of brown macroalgae used in phytoremediation of metal-containing waste streams.
Keywords: alginate, biofuel, copper, pyrolysis, thermochemistry, seaweed
1. Introduction
Biofuels represent one of a number of renewable technologies that aim to alleviate an overdependence on fossil-derived hydrocarbons. However, in recent years, the social, financial, climatological, ecological and political impacts of certain biofuels, such as corn-derived ethanol and palm oil-based biodiesel, have been highly contested [1]. With this in mind, so-called ‘advanced’ biofuels, derived primarily from feedstocks such as waste and non-edible plant matter, have awoken interest from the scientific community and beyond [2].
Although advanced biofuels are naturally more sustainable than their earlier counterparts, there are inevitable technological difficulties associated with the requirement to treat complex, heterogeneous, multi-component feedstocks, which may be difficult to upgrade using conventional biomass processing techniques such as fermentation and anaerobic digestion [3]. Consequently, thermochemical processing methods such as pyrolysis, hydrothermal liquefaction and gasification (all of which use heat to convert the feed) have come to the fore as versatile treatment options [4]. In this context, a diverse range of raw materials have now been considered for the production of fuels and chemicals, including woods [5], bagasse [6], rice husks [7], tyres [8], duck weed [9] and sewage sludge [10].
One type of feedstock that has demonstrated considerable potential in thermochemical processing are macroalgae [11–14]. Macroalgae, or seaweed, are a group of fast-growing aquatic organisms that include some 9000 species worldwide [15]. Owing to the need for structural flexibility in turbulent coastal environments, macroalgae consist predominantly of elastic polysaccharides such as laminarin, carrageenan, agarose and alginic acid [16,17]; a stark contrast to the rigid lignocellulosic support required by terrestrial flora. These differences in biochemical composition mean that macroalgae offer unique opportunities in terms of thermochemical processing and its resulting products compared with their land-based counterparts. Moreover, seaweeds have the added advantages of high photosynthetic efficiencies (up to four times greater than terrestrial plants) and not competing with forestry and agriculture for land and fresh water [18,19].
Phaeophyceae (brown macroalgae, of which the orders Laminariales and Fucales are colloquially known as kelp) are common around the coasts of northern Europe [16] with considerable interest in their utilization as a feedstock for manufacturing commodity chemicals, dating back to the early seventeenth century [20]. More recently, work has demonstrated that kelps (including Laminaria digitata) show promise in thermochemical processes such as pyrolysis, because of their abundance, the diverse range of products they can afford and their relatively low thermal decomposition temperatures [11,12]. However, comparative investigations of macroalgae in thermochemical applications are hampered by the inherent heterogeneous nature of the samples collected for study [11]. This is particularly problematic because both the carbohydrate and metal contents vary considerably as a function of season, geographical location, local environment, induced stress conditions and by species [21–23], meaning studies that examine only a single sample of seaweed can be severely restricted in the generality and applicability of their conclusions. Consequently, investigations that use appropriate model compounds rather than whole biomass are of interest. Such an approach circumvents the problems associated with natural variance in biochemical composition and reveals fundamental trends, including the origins of various products and the key decomposition temperatures of certain constituents, thereby allowing pyrolysis processes to be better understood and, ultimately, optimized [24].
A particular area where model compounds can assist is in the prediction of the thermochemical behaviour of a biomass feedstock as a function of metal content. This parameter is particularly important since the presence of naturally occurring metals has been found to influence greatly the pyrolysis behaviour of various biomass types [25,26]. For example, potassium ions have been demonstrated to alter the kinetics of thermolysis (lowering both the first-order activation energy and onset temperature of rapid pyrolysis) of short rotation willow coppice, as well as promoting the conversion of complex molecules such as levoglucosan to more simple compounds, including acetic and formic acid [26,27].
Despite the established impact of metal ions in biomass thermochemical processing, their role is generally not well understood and has only been investigated for a few types of feedstock. Developing such insights for macroalgae feedstocks where the metal concentrations can be remarkably high (of the order of 10–20% of the dry weight [12]) is imperative. Indeed, significantly, few of the investigations to date feature a full analysis of the metal profile in the feedstock [28–30]. However, it should be noted that these types of studies are complicated because samples of metal-free macroalgae are not readily accessible as metal ion extraction (by acid washing for example) typically results in significant alteration of the biomolecular matrix that is under investigation [31,32]. Furthermore, a number of recent studies have started to probe the effects of directly incorporating metal-based catalysts into various biomass pyrolysis processes (including macroalgal studies [33]) with a view to influencing the resulting product distributions and selectivity [34,35]. Again, however, in order to optimize catalyst integration in an effective manner, a clear understanding of the nature and impact of naturally occurring metals is of great importance.
In order to circumvent the issues associated with macroalgal sample heterogeneity and metal ion removal for thermolysis studies, alginic acid (consisting of alternating blocks of unbranched binary copolymers of 1,4-linked α-d-mannuronic (M) and β-l-guluronic (G) acid residues) and the corresponding metal alginate salts constitute a promising set of compounds with which to model the effects of metals. Alginate materials not only constitute between 10 and 40 wt% of the dry weight of many common kelps [22], but they are also largely responsible for the metal sequestering properties of brown macroalgae (figure 1) [36]. Thus, studies of discrete metal alginate salts can be used to model macroalgal thermal degradation, exemplifying the effects of a particular metal ion on pyrolysis without the results being convoluted by processes related to the decomposition of other compounds in the rest of the biomass.
Figure 1.
Schematic of the mode of uptake of various mono- and di-valent metallic ions found in seawater by α-l-guluronic acid and β-d-mannuronic acid, which polymerize to form alginic acid (and the corresponding alginate salts) in large quantities in brown macroalgae [36]. (Online version in colour.)
A number of studies have explored the effects of various metals on alginate thermal stability using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), a technique that measures the volatilization of a sample by recording mass loss as a function of temperature [37–44]. However, many of these TGA-based investigations have been carried out under oxidative conditions, where combustion is the predominant reaction. Consequently, these studies are poor models for understanding pyrolysis behaviour, which requires an inert environment. However, one study by Ross and co-workers examined both pyrolysis (in a nitrogen atmosphere) and oxidation (in air) of alginic acid and the corresponding sodium and calcium salts [44]. This study showed that calcium alginate degrades at a higher temperature than the sodium counterpart, which decomposes at a temperature closer to that of the parent acid. Both salts generated pyrolysis products similar to those from alginic acid, although the sodium salt equivalent gives rise to a significantly higher proportion of cyclopentenone derivatives. These observations indicate the influence that other metal ions may have on pyrolysis kinetics (i.e. temperatures, rate of pyrolysis, Arrhenius parameters) and resultant products from alginates and, crucially, raise the question of the degree to which these effects are mirrored during the pyrolysis of whole macroalgal biomass.
The work presented here aims to further the understanding of the impact of metals, widening the present studies on alginate thermolysis with alkali and alkaline earth metals to include d-block elements, which are found in some seaweed samples at concentrations many thousands of times higher than the surrounding seawater [45]. Studies to probe such effects are complex because, despite the passive nature of the biosorption process, macroalgae show preferences for certain metals above others, with the relative affinities (shown in figure 2) having been determined for divalent metal species. The observed trend is not easily explained, but it is thought to originate from the so-called ‘egg box’ model of divalent cation binding to alginates [46], in which some M2+ ions fit the anionic cavities provided by two parallel strands of β-l-guluronic acid better than others (figure 3) [47]. Indeed, brown macroalgae harvested from copper-polluted water exhibit particularly high concentrations of Cu2+ ions, which is a direct consequence of the high affinity of alginates for copper [48,49].
Figure 2.

The affinity of alginic acid in L. digitata for various divalent cations [47].
Figure 3.

The ‘egg box’ model of divalent cation bonding in alginic acid [46]. (Online version in colour.)
Accordingly, the following study will examine the effects of Cu2+ ions on the slow pyrolysis (i.e. at a heating rate less than 50°C min−1 [50]) of alginates via TGA. However, in addition to this, it is also desirable to analyse the degree to which these findings are applicable to the outcomes of the thermal treatment of samples of real seaweed biomass. In order to facilitate such a comparison, the metals inherently present in a sample of macroalgae can be almost completely ion exchanged with Cu2+ ions by soaking the seaweed in a copper-containing solution and, subsequently, the resulting copper(II)-doped macroalgae can be subjected to the same TGA treatment as the model copper(II) alginate compound. This approach will allow for a wider discussion on the methodological validity of using model compounds for studying biomass pyrolysis and the importance of characterizing the full metal content of a feedstock prior to its thermal analysis, a practice that is not currently commonplace.
2. Materials and methods
Alginic acid (H-Alg) and sodium alginate (Na-Alg) were obtained in powdered form from Sigma Aldrich and used as received.
2.1. Preparation of copper(II) alginate (Cu-Alg)
Copper(II) alginate (Cu-Alg) was prepared via an ion exchange protocol by suspending sodium alginate (2.0 g) in a solution of Cu(NO3)2 (100 ml, 1.0 M) and stirring vigorously for 6 h at room temperature, according to the following reaction:
| 2.1 |
The resulting light blue gelatinous precipitate was subsequently isolated by filtration, washed thoroughly with deionized water and dried to a constant weight at 80°C, which led to the isolation of a dark green solid.
2.2. Thermal analysis of H-Alg, Na-Alg and Cu-Alg
The alginic acid and two metal alginate powders were ground and sieved to 250 μm. The three samples were then subsequently dried at 105°C overnight, immediately prior to the TGA experiments, in order to attain similar moisture contents since both the alginate materials and alginic acid are hygroscopic. TGA experiments were carried out on the dried, ground samples of the H-, Na- and Cu-Alg using a Perkin Elmer Pyris 1 analyser by loading 20.0 ± 0.5 mg of the sample evenly into a platinum pan and subsequently heating from 25 to 900°C at 5, 10, 20, 30 and 40°C min−1 under a flow of dry N2 at 25 ml min−1. The first derivative of the TGA data yielded the differential thermogravimetric profile (DTG). Coupled thermogravimetric analysis–Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic (TGA-FTIR) analyses of the three alginate samples were also carried out by heating the powders to 1000°C at 10°C min−1 on a TA Q500 V6.7 Build 203 coupled to a Nicolet IS 10 infrared spectrometer. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analyses were conducted on a TA Instruments DSC analyser (Q1000, v. 9.9, build 303) by placing 5.0 ± 0.5 mg of sample into an aluminium sample pan, crimping it shut and then heating from 30 to 500 at 10°C min−1 under a flow of dry N2 at 50 ml min−1. For comparison, TGA of powdered samples of Na2CO3, CaCO3 and CuCO3 (each obtained from Sigma Aldrich and used as received) was also undertaken.
2.3. Kinetic analysis
TGA of H-, Na- and Cu-Alg was carried out at five different heating rates (β), in order to determine the energy of activation (Ea) and pre-exponential factor (A) for the thermal degradation of the samples at certain points in the pyrolysis process. This was achieved by adopting a previously used method, based on the approach described below [51].
During thermolysis, a sample will lose mass through volatilization. Hence, a degree of conversion αn of the sample at a temperature Tn can be defined:
| 2.2 |
where m0 is the initial mass of the sample, mn is the mass at temperature Tn and m∞ is the final mass. Thus, the rate of thermolysis, or the rate of change of α with time, t, can be described by a temperature-dependant Arrhenius expression, k(T), scaled by a function f(α), the conversion function:
| 2.3 |
The conversion function reflects the mechanistic nature of the thermolysis process that is taking place. Assuming, crudely, that there is a single first-order reaction taking place at any particular temperature during the pyrolysis being studied, and which occurs uniformly throughout the biomass sample, this may be defined as
| 2.4 |
The constant rate at which the sample is heated, β, can simply be defined as the change of temperature, T, with time, t:
| 2.5 |
Combining equations (2.3) and (2.4) gives
| 2.6 |
Since the Arrhenius function k(T) has the form
| 2.7 |
it is possible to define
| 2.8 |
and thus the experimentally determined turning points of the DTG profile represent the maximum volatilization rates, i.e.
| 2.9 |
Hence, by rearrangement the following expression is obtained:
| 2.10 |
And so, from a graph of
versus 1/Tmax, the values of Ea and A can be calculated [51].
2.4. Preparation of macroalgae (Laminaria digitata)
Samples of L. digitata were harvested from Marsden Bay, South Shields, UK (54°58′42.58″ N, 1°23′0.97″ W) on 28 October 2011 (figure 4). The samples were washed in distilled water to remove the majority of the sand and grit, and frozen at −18°C within 4 h of harvest. After being allowed to thaw naturally at room temperature for 8 h, the macroalgae were shredded, dried to a constant weight at 80°C, and ground and sieved to 250 μm. The dry, powdered macroalgae samples were either used immediately or returned to storage at −18°C.
Figure 4.
L. digitata collection site: Marsden Bay, South Shields, UK.
2.5. Cu2+ ion exchange in L. digitata
The alkali and alkaline earth metals inherently present in a sample of wild L. digitata were replaced with Cu2+ ions via an ion-exchange process: the L. digitata (as prepared in §2.4) were suspended in a solution of Cu(NO3)2 (100 ml, 1.0 M) and stirred vigorously for 6 h at room temperature. The ion-exchanged macroalgae were subsequently isolated by filtration, washed thoroughly with deionized water (100 ml) and dried to a constant weight at 80°C.
2.6. Thermal analysis of L. digitata
Both the untreated L. digitata, and the Cu2+ ion-exchanged L. digitata were dried overnight at 105°C immediately prior to analysis. TGA experiments were carried out on the dried, ground seaweed samples using a Perkin Elmer Pyris 1 analyser. Samples of 20.0 ± 0.5 mg were loaded into a platinum pan and spread evenly. The sample was subsequently heated from 25°C to 900°C at a heating rate (β) of 10°C min−1 under a flow of dry N2 at 25 ml min−1. The first derivative of the TGA plot yielded the DTG profile.
DSC analyses were performed on a TA Instruments DSC analyser (Q1000, v. 9.9, build 303) by placing 5.0 ± 0.5 mg of sample into an aluminium pan, crimping it shut and then heating from 30 to 500°C at 10°C min−1 under a flow of dry N2 at 50 ml min−1.
2.7. Elemental analyses
C, H and N compositions of all samples were determined by combustion on an Exeter Analytical CE440 elemental analyser by the Analytical Department of the Chemistry Department, Durham University.
The concentrations of 26 common metals in the L. digitata (known to be present in significant concentrations from previous investigations [22,23]) were determined via inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry analysis (ICP-MS) using a Thermo Fisher X–Series II analyser; the analysed samples were prepared by Carius tube digestion in a concentrated, ultrapure HNO3:HCl mix (3 : 1 by volume). The Cu and Na concentrations in H-, Na- and Cu-Alg were also determined using this method. Fluka analytical TraceSELECT ultrapure acids and standards were used in the analyses and high-purity deionized water was used throughout.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Pyrolysis of alginic acid and alginates
Samples of alginic acid (H-Alg), sodium alginate (Na-Alg) and copper(II) alginate (Cu-Alg) were prepared as in §2.1. Examination of their elemental analysis profiles (table 1) reveals that the exchange of sodium for copper ions occurred almost completely, with the equilibrium depicted in equation (2.1) lying predominantly to the right-hand side, an effect predicted in earlier studies on the affinity of alginates for Cu2+ ions (see §1) [47,48].
Table 1.
Partial elemental analysis of H-Alg, Na-Alg and Cu-Alg.
| C (wt%) | H (wt%) | N (wt%) | Na (wt%) | Cu (wt%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| alginic acid (H-Alg) | 39.94 | 4.54 | 0 | 0.39 | 0.05 |
| sodium alginate (Na-Alg) | 33.95 | 3.72 | 0 | 10.60 | 0.05 |
| copper(II) alginate (Cu-Alg) | 32.29 | 3.62 | 0 | 0.03 | 14.81 |
A comparison was made of the pyrolysis behaviour of Cu-Alg against that of H-Alg and Na-Alg in order to probe the effect of the Cu2+ ions in the alginate structure [36]. Broadly, it was found that for all three compounds, thermal degradation occurred in three discrete temperature windows (phases 1–3) defined by Ti (the onset of rapid pyrolysis) and Tf (the end of rapid pyrolysis). However, despite this apparent similarity, it was found that the behaviour of the different materials within these three temperature regimes varied dramatically, as demonstrated by the DTG (figure 5a) and TGA (figure 5b) curves. In particular, a detailed analysis of the three distinct pyrolysis regions highlights the dramatic influence exerted by the presence of the metal ions on the pyrolysis of the alginic acid polymer.
Figure 5.
The (a) DTG, (b) TGA and (c) degree of conversion profiles for the thermolysis of H-Alg, Na-Alg and Cu-Alg over the temperature range 25–1000°C obtained with a heating rate (β) of 10°C min−1 under N2. Dashed line, Na; dotted line, Cu; solid line, H.
3.1.1. Phase 1: 25oC ≤ T < Ti
The small mass loss (around 5 wt%) observed in this region for H-, Na- and Cu-Alg is attributed to simple loss of moisture, which had re-absorbed following drying to a constant weight at 105°C prior to the TGA, consistent with the hygroscopic nature of these materials [24,28,52–54]. This is in agreement with the large endothermic peak during this temperature region on the DSC curve featured in figure 6, which results from water evaporating from the sample.
Figure 6.
Comparison of TGA (dashed line) and DSC (solid line) curves for (a) H-Alg, (b) Na-Alg, and (c) Cu-Alg over the temperature range 50–400°C obtained with a heating rate (β) of 10°C min−1 under N2.
3.1.2. Phase 2: Ti < T < Tf
The region of the TGA profile that lies between Ti and Tf is arguably the most important when considering biomass pyrolysis in general (and that of related model materials) because it is within this window that the maximum degree of volatilization takes place, with between 40 and 50 wt% of the initial mass of the sample being lost. Ti corresponds to the temperature where rapid pyrolysis begins to take effect. With a heating rate, β, of 10°C min−1 the value of Ti varies with Cu-Alg (150°C) < H-Alg (161°C) < Na-Alg (207°C). During this period of rapid pyrolysis, several notable features appear at Tmax (the temperature at which the maximum mass loss rate occurs) signified by an intense peak in the DTG curve. A summary of the values of Ti, Tf and Tmax for H-Alg, Na-Alg and Cu-Alg recorded at five different heating rates (β) is given in table 2. It can be seen that the H-Alg and Cu-Alg samples show two peaks (Tmax1 and Tmax2), whereas the Na-Alg only shows one (simply Tmax); the latter represents a much greater rate of mass loss and occurs at a similar temperature to H-Alg Tmax2. This indicates that the first step in the pyrolysis pathway is somehow inhibited (relative to H-Alg) by the Na+ ions until some critical temperature (207°C), after which the subsequent reactions occur very rapidly. Many of the reactions that cause the rapid volatilization of the solid feedstock are not well understood and there is still much work to be done to gain a better understanding of this pyrolysis phase, both in the case of alginates and for biomass in general [55]. Interestingly, however, the DSC profiles for H-Alg, Na-Alg and Cu-Alg during this phase of pyrolysis (figure 6) all show sharp exothermic peaks, revealing that the net effect of the reactions that lead to the rapid volatilization stage is to release heat, presumably as more thermodynamically stable compounds are formed from the decomposition.
Table 2.
Key kinetic and thermal parameters in the pyrolysis of H-Alg, Cu-Alg and Na-Alg.
| pyrolysis temperatures (oC) |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β (oC min−1) | Ti | Tmax1 | Tmax2 | Tmax | Tf | |
| H-Alg | 5 | 157 | 210 | 246 | — | 267 |
| 10 | 161 | 216 | 254 | — | 275 | |
| 20 | 168 | 220 | 256 | — | 278 | |
| 30 | 176 | 228 | 261 | — | 286 | |
| 40 | 180 | 233 | 264 | — | 289 | |
| Ea (kJ mol−1) | — | 174 | 269 | — | — | |
| ln A | — | 36 | 55 | — | — | |
| R2 | — | 0.95 | 0.98 | — | — | |
| Cu-Alg | 5 | 143 | 184 | 231 | — | 261 |
| 10 | 150 | 196 | 239 | — | 270 | |
| 20 | 156 | 202 | 242 | — | 277 | |
| 30 | 162 | 208 | 247 | — | 287 | |
| 40 | 164 | 215 | 249 | — | 292 | |
| Ea (kJ mol−1) | — | 123 | 248 | — | — | |
| ln A | — | 24 | 52 | — | — | |
| R2 | — | 0.98 | 0.98 | — | — | |
| Na-Alg | 5 | 204 | — | — | 239 | 271 |
| 10 | 207 | — | — | 246 | 283 | |
| 20 | 215 | — | — | 249 | 286 | |
| 30 | 221 | — | — | 252 | 296 | |
| 40 | 225 | — | — | 250 | 298 | |
| Ea (kJ mol−1) | — | — | — | 340 | — | |
| ln A | — | — | — | 73 | — | |
| R2 | — | — | — | 0.88 | — | |
Tf marks the end of the period of rapid volatilization and varies as Cu-Alg (270°C) < H-Alg (275°C) < Na-Alg (283°C); this is a much smaller temperature range than that for Ti, where approximately 60°C separates Cu-Alg from Na-Alg. This appears to be because the Na-Alg demonstrates a much higher mass loss rate during the period Ti to Tf. Consequently, although the onset of rapid pyrolysis for Na-Alg begins at a higher temperature than for both Cu-Alg and H-Alg, volatilization of the sodium salt proceeds very quickly with mass loss ending at a temperature only slightly higher than those recorded for copper(II) alginate and alginic acid.
3.1.3. Phase 3: Tf < T ≤ 1000°C
The region from Tf onwards is generally regarded as being a period of slower, sustained degradation in biomass pyrolysis. Reaction processes occurring within this region are thought to consist mainly of secondary pyrolysis reactions, tar cracking, char formation and the degradation of thermally robust inorganic constituents [24,28,52–54]. Consequently, the rate of mass loss is considerably lower than that in phase 2, with the final mass achieved corresponding to the amount of char produced.
For biomass such as macroalgae, the residual char is primarily composed of carbon and inorganic materials, such as metal oxides and metal carbonates, which form as the metal ions bound to the alginates react with the organic matrix upon degradation [44]. Some of the inorganic salts may be products of secondary reactions, such as the formation of metal carbonates from the reaction between CO2 (released throughout the pyrolysis process) and other metal oxides. To survive to the char stage, however, the inorganic constituents need to be thermally robust, and some may degrade prior to 1000°C. Figure 7 shows the TGA/DTG profiles of some of the inorganic constituents (namely copper, sodium and calcium carbonate) that may be expected to form during the pyrolysis of the Na-Alg and Cu-Alg. CuCO3 degrades to CuO and CO2 at around 300°C (with a later, much smaller mass loss at around 900°C, as the CuO begins to form Cu2O [56]; figure 7). Consequently, no peak is seen that corresponds to the degradation of CuCO3 in the pyrolysis of Cu-Alg between Tf and 1000°C. Conversely, pure Na2CO3, which melts at around 850°C, does not start to significantly volatilize until temperatures above 1000°C [57] and hence no features arising from this material were observed. However, a high temperature thermal decomposition feature is apparent during the pyrolysis of Na-Alg, something that has been attributed to small quantities of calcium ion impurities present in the alginate that initially react to form CaCO3 [44], and which subsequently decomposes at temperatures around 700°C (figure 7) [58]. The H-Alg material contains only trace inorganic content and is virtually completely degraded by 650°C. Thus, in the higher temperature regions (more than 650°C), there are no regions of significant mass loss in the TGA profile that correspond to the degradation of inorganic salts.
Figure 7.
The (a) DTG and (b) TGA profiles for the thermolysis of Na2CO3, CuCO3 and CaCO3 over the temperature range 25–1000°C obtained with a heating rate (β) of 10°C min−1 under N2. Dashed line, Ca; solid line, Cu; dotted line, Na.
As expected, the inorganic materials present in the Cu-Alg and Na-Alg materials are not fully volatilized by 1000°C. Metal oxides that form during pyrolysis such as Cu2O, CuO and Na2O remain intact, something that results in higher char yield for the Cu-Alg and Na-Alg samples (14.6 and 17.0 wt%, respectively), compared with that from H-Alg (1.1 wt%) [12]. Consequently, by using TGA data directly, it is difficult to compare the effects of metals in the thermal degradation of metal-rich biomass samples, as the relative mass loss is smaller as a result of the significant amounts of inorganic char formed. Thus, to gain a deeper insight into the rate of volatilization of the important organic constituents of the biomass occurring during pyrolysis, a plot of the degree of conversion α (defined in equation (2.2)) against temperature, as depicted in figure 5c, can be informative. This degree of conversion (α) does not include the amount of residual char and only considers matter that is volatilizable below the maximum temperature used in the experiment, 1000°C. Consequently, samples such as Cu-Alg and Na-Alg, which have comparably high inorganic content (with 10–15 wt% consisting of metal ions), can be compared directly with H-Alg, which is almost entirely organic. Thus, whereas the TGA profiles suggest that the extent of mass loss of Na-Alg with temperature is consistently lower than for H-Alg, when the mass lost is considered as a fraction of the total amount volatilized (i.e. the degree of conversion), it can be seen that there is a period between 240°C and 330°C where the Na-Alg has lost a greater proportion of its volatilizable mass than has H-Alg, indicating that the Na+ ions promote pyrolysis between these temperatures.
Furthermore, the TGA data suggest that the H-Alg and Cu-Alg materials are comparable in terms of the extent of mass lost upon pyrolysis to 285°C. However, if the degree of conversion data α are examined, it becomes apparent that the samples of H-Alg and Cu-Alg do not achieve the same value until a pyrolysis temperature of 480°C. This latter observation indicates that the Cu2+ ions promote pyrolysis of the organic matter over a much wider temperature range than would be apparent from the TGA profile alone. Indeed, the data presented in figure 5c also clearly demonstrate that the presence of Cu2+ ions inhibits the later stages (phase 3) of alginic acid pyrolysis quite considerably (cf. H-Alg and Na-Alg) and severely slows down the rate of volatilization above approximately 500°C.
This observation contradicts previous studies, where the presence of mono- (Na+) and divalent (Ca2+, Co2+) metal ions have all been shown to inhibit the onset of pyrolysis of alginates relative to that of the parent acid [43,44]. By contrast, the results presented here indicate that Cu2+ ions clearly shift the onset of pyrolysis to a lower temperature with respect to the (practically) metal-free alginic acid. To explain this phenomenon, however, requires a better understanding of the interaction of the metal ions with both the mannuronic and guluronic acid residues that comprise the alginates as it appears that, though the alginic acid shows a high affinity for Cu2+ ions, the presence of such ions also serves to destabilize the polymer at higher temperatures. In order to better quantify the observed trend in thermal stability (i.e. Cu-Alg < H-Alg < Ca-Alg), a kinetic study was carried out for the second stage of pyrolysis for all three compounds. The mathematical details of the model used are elaborated in §2.3, but the principle behind the analysis was to plot
versus 1/Tmax, where Tmax represents a point of maximum mass loss rate (identified as a turning point in the DTG profile) for five different heating rates (β = 5, 10, 20, 30 and 40°C min−1).
From this plot (figure 8), the gradient can be used to extract the energy of activation, Ea, for the reaction(s) occurring at that point in the pyrolysis, with the intercept giving the pre-exponential factor, A. The plots in figure 9 show the DTG profiles at the five different heating rates (β). As β increases, the DTG curve maintains a similar shape, but is shifted to a higher temperature; this is a well-documented effect that arises owing to the delay in heat transfer to the samples being analysed [59]. The results of the kinetic analyses are summarized in table 2. The energy of activation, Ea, was calculated for two points in the pyrolysis (Tmax1 and Tmax2) for H-Alg and Cu-Alg, and at one point (Tmax) for Na-Alg obtained from the peaks in the DTG profiles (figure 5a). The values of Ea give an indication of the energy required to initiate the reaction(s) occurring at that temperature in the pyrolysis, and so they provide a useful comparison of the ease of volatilization of the compounds relative to each other. It is unsurprising then that the trends in the values of Ea reflect the trends in the values of Ti (Ti(Cu-Alg) < Ti(H-Alg)), thus Ea(Tmax1)Cu-Alg < Ea(Tmax1)H-Alg and Ea(Tmax2)Cu-Alg < Ea(Tmax2)H-Alg and thus the kinetic data further corroborate the observation that Cu2+ ions promote volatilization in the rapid pyrolysis phase with respect to H-Alg. Further comparison with Na-Alg is not straightforward however, as the DTG profiles (figure 9c) are not well resolved. Consequently, only one value of Tmax (and thus Ea) can be determined for Na-Alg (table 2) from the single, broad peak, which is clearly associated with a larger number of reactions than the separate, narrower peaks in the Cu-Alg and H-Alg spectra. This gives rise to the correspondingly large value of Ea for sodium alginate, which cannot meaningfully be correlated with the values of Ea determined for the other compounds.
Figure 8.

Plot of ln(β/T2) versus 1/T (with T in kelvin) at the points of maximum volatilization of H-Alg, Cu-Alg and Na-Alg, pyrolysed at β = 5, 10, 20, 30 and 40°C min−1.
Figure 9.
The DTG profiles for the main pyrolysis region of (a) H-Alg, (b) Cu-Alg and (c) Na-Alg at heating rates (β) of 5, 10, 20, 30 and 40°C min−1 under N2.
Finally, coupled TGA-FTIR analysis gives insight into aspects of the thermal degradation pathways of H-Alg, Na-Alg and Cu-Alg, and the differences between them. Figure 10 shows that the primary volatile component product for this ‘slow’ pyrolysis, in all three cases, is CO2, as evidenced by the intense absorbance at 2360 cm−1; this observation has been reported previously from studies using coupled TGA–gas-chromatography/mass spectrometry (Py-GC-MS) [42,44]. Interestingly, if the intensity of the IR absorbance at 2360 cm−1 is plotted against temperature during the pyrolysis of H-Alg, Na-Alg and Cu-Alg over the temperature range 150–300°C (figure 11a), the trace can be seen to completely replicate the trend in mass loss shown in the equivalent section of the TGA curve (figure 11b). Thus, it is possible that the rapid period of pyrolysis that begins at Ti (discussed above) is most likely attributable to decarboxylation of the carboxylate group of the alginates, which explains the rapid release of CO2.
Figure 10.

TGA-FTIR profile for the thermolysis of (a) Na-Alg, (b) Cu-Alg and (c) H-Alg over the temperature range 25–1000°C obtained with a heating rate (β) of 10°C min−1 under N2.
Figure 11.
(a) Plot of absorbance at 2360 cm−1 versus temperature for the thermolysis of Na-Alg, Cu-Alg and H-Alg over the temperature range 150–300°C obtained with a heating rate (β) of 10°C min−1 under N2. (b) TGA profile for the thermolysis of Na-Alg, Cu-Alg and H-Alg over the temperature range 150–300°C obtained with a heating rate (β) of 10°C min−1 under N2. (c) Plot of absorbance at 2360 cm−1 versus temperature for the thermolysis of Na-Alg, Cu-Alg and H-Alg over the temperature range 25–1000°C obtained with a heating rate (β) of 10°C min−1 under N2. Dashed line, Na; dotted line, Cu; solid line, H.
Beyond the temperature region 150–300°C, the amount of CO2 evolved is seen to increase to a maximum in the case of Cu-Alg and H-Alg, but decrease in the case of Na-Alg. This decrease is a consequence of the reaction between CO2 and sodium salts such as Na2O, from which Na2CO3 can form, thus retaining the CO2 until decomposition at much higher temperatures (figure 11c) [44]. Of course, the formation of carbonates is not possible in the case of the Cu-Alg (because CuCO3 is not stable at these temperatures; figure 7), and for H-Alg, which does not contain significant metallic species for carbonates to form. The amount of CO2 released is highest in H-Alg (as evidenced by the larger area under the curve in figure 11c), which is expected owing to the higher carbon content of the starting material compared with the metal salts.
Other minor peaks in the TGA-FTIR profile indicate that a number of other compounds may be evolved in the pyrolysis processes. Earlier studies have suggested that the minor peaks observed between 1500 and 1800 cm−1 in the IR spectrum that begin to appear after around 300°C (absorbance around 0.02) could be due to a mixture of small, volatile, organic molecules bearing carbonyl groups such as formaldehyde, acetone and furfural, among others [42,44].
3.2. Influence of metals on the pyrolysis of macroalgae
In order to test the applicability of the results from the study of model biomass compounds (H-Alg, Na-Alg, Cu-Alg) described in §3.1, whereby Cu2+ ions were shown to promote the onset of pyrolysis of alginic acid, an actual sample of macroalgal biomass should be subject to thermal degradation to test for similar effects. Indeed, previous studies have examined the role of metals in macroalgae pyrolysis by removing them completely and analysing the metal-stripped materials. However, this approach requires the macroalgae to be treated via washing with acid, something that has the additional detrimental effect of removing a significant fraction of the soluble organic constituents such as mannitol and fucose and potentially hydrolysing some of the carbohydrates [31,32]. Consequently, it is very difficult to determine which effects upon the pyrolysis are due to the presence or absence of the metals, and which result from the removal of the soluble biomolecules. Here, we present a different and novel approach whereby instead of removing the metals, samples of seaweed are saturated with one particular metal species (in this case copper) to determine the effects on pyrolysis with minimal alteration to the volatilizable organic matter. This methodology is especially suited to the study of brown macroalgae, which have an extremely high affinity for Cu2+ ions, making it possible to achieve very high levels of ion exchange with relative ease [48].
To this end, a sample of wild L. digitata was subject to a metal ion exchange process, which resulted in replacement of around 93 per cent of the alkali, alkaline earth and other trace metals by Cu2+ ions. Table 3 depicts the elemental compositions of the L. digitata samples pre- and post-impregnation via ion exchange. It was found that the original seaweed, as collected, contained around 122 000 (±1000) mgmetal/kgdry-seaweed, which was increased to 161 000 (±1000) mgmetal/kgdry-seaweed after copper-ion exchange, accompanied by a slight decrease in carbon content (2.0 wt%). The data reported in table 3 also suggest that, within experimental uncertainty, electroneutrality of the seaweed was maintained according to equation (2.1). Furthermore, the low nitrate content of the ion-exchanged material indicates that the copper detected was bound to the biomass and not residual Cu(NO3)2 used for impregnation, which was removed during the washing stages.
Table 3.
Partial elemental profile of unadulterated L. digitata and L. digitata treated in a solution of Cu2+ ions.a
| elementb: | Cr | Ba | Li | Mn | Fe | Ni | Zn | Rb | Mo | Ag | Pb | Na | Mg | Al | K | Ca | Sr | Cu | Total | C (wt%) | H (wt%) | N (wt%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| unadulterated L. digitata | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (mg/kgseaweed) | 2 | 14 | 1 | 4 | 116 | 1 | 52 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 42 268 | 13 344 | 345 | 39 787 | 25 002 | 1727 | 3 | 122 677 | 37.6 | 5.2 | 1.6 |
| (mmol/kgseaweed) | 0.04 | 0.10 | 0.14 | 0.07 | 2.07 | 0.02 | 0.80 | 0.11 | 0.01 | 1837 | 556 | 12.8 | 1020 | 625 | 19.6 | 0.05 | 4075 | |||||
| charge | 2+ | 2+ | 1+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 1+ | 2+ | 1+ | 2+ | 1+ | 2+ | 3+ | 1+ | 2+ | 1+ | 2+ | 5285c | |||
| Cu(II)-doped L. digitata | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (mg/kgseaweed) | 13 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 173 | 10 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 21 | 9 | 3638 | 35 | 430 | 286 | 159 | 26 | 1 56 295 | 161 112 | 35.6 | 4.8 | 1.9 |
| (mmol/kgseaweed) | 0.25 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 3.09 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.01 | 0.19 | 0.04 | 158 | 1.46 | 15.9 | 7.33 | 3.98 | 0.30 | 2442 | 2633 | |||||
| charge | 2+ | 2+ | 1+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 1+ | 2+ | 1+ | 2+ | 1+ | 2+ | 3+ | 1+ | 2+ | 1+ | 2+ | 5116c | |||
aOn a dry basis.
bBe, Co, Ga, Cd, Cs, Bi, Tl and V were also detected but below milligram per kilogram levels.
cThe sum of the number of moles of each element multiplied by its charge.
The two samples of L. digitata (the unadulterated sample and its Cu-exchanged counterpart) were pyrolysed under the same experimental conditions as described earlier for H-, Na- and Cu-Alg ; the results are shown in the TGA/DTG plots in figure 12. Generally speaking, these analyses reveal that the Cu-doped macroalgae sample shows the same mass loss regions as the H-, Na- and Cu-Alg samples; dehydration, rapid pyrolysis and slow degradation phases are readily identifiable. Notably, although the onset of rapid pyrolysis occurs at a higher temperature for the real macroalgae biomass samples relative to those of the model compounds, the Cu2+ ions are seen to exert a similar influence and Cu-doped macroalgae (Ti = 164°C) are observed to begin rapid pyrolysis at a lower temperature compared with the unadulterated macroalgae (Ti = 180°C). The same trend is also true for the values of Tmax (Tmax(Cu(II)-L.dig) = 236°C compared with Tmax(L.dig) = 254°C). However, at Tf, the two seaweed samples begin to show remarkably similar mass loss profiles, something that continues until around 650°C, where the unadulterated macroalgae show a very slight additional mass loss relative to the Cu-exchanged. This latter mass loss is most likely to be a result of thermolysis of CaCO3 (as shown by the data presented in figure 7), which forms owing to the sizeable concentration of Ca2+ present in the biomass (2.5 wt%). Thus, the conclusions drawn from the kinetic studies on the model alginate compounds are also true in the case of actual macroalgal biomass: the presence of Cu2+ ions promotes pyrolysis at lower temperatures, but does not assist in the later stages of high temperature volatilization.
Figure 12.
The (a) DTG and (b) TGA profiles for the thermolysis of raw L. digitata and L. digitata treated in a solution of Cu2+ ions in the range 25–800°C with a heating rate (β) of 10°C min−1 under N2. Solid line, copper(II)-doped L. digitata; dashed line, L. digitata.
The similarities between the thermal behaviour of the model compound (copper(II) alginate) and the real biomass (copper(II)-doped L. digitata) can be further demonstrated by reference to the DSC profiles (figure 13a). These analyses show that, broadly, the major exotherms for the Cu-Alg overlap with those of the copper(II)-doped L. digitata, with the peaks in the heat flow to the latter material being less pronounced owing to the presence of other (thermally stable) compounds in the rest of the biomass. The main difference between the two thermograms is a small endothermic event beginning at around 170°C in the DSC curve of Cu-Alg, which, when compared with the TGA data for Cu-Alg (figure 6c), is apparently associated with the onset of rapid devolatilization. The event is not, however, a feature in the DSC curve of the copper(II)-doped seaweed due to the smaller proportion of alginate in the sample coupled with potential insulating effects and, conceivably, exothermic events originating from other components present in the biomass. Thus, when these complicating factors are accounted for, it can be seen that the Cu-Alg effectively mimics the thermal behaviour of the copper(II)-doped L. digitata, and the sharp exothermic event at around 235°C in the pyrolysis of the real biomass can easily be assigned to the degradation of the alginate. An interesting comparison can then be made between the results of the DSC analysis of the copper-doped seaweed sample with those of the unadulterated L. digitata (figure 13b), for which the latter material displays a much less well-defined profile. It can be seen that the peaks in the thermogram of the unadulterated L. digitata are generally broader and more numerous, reflecting the varying influences of the many different metal ions on the thermolysis of the biomass, with some inhibiting that stage of decomposition (such as Ca2+) and some promoting it (such as Cu2+).
Figure 13.
(a) Comparison of DSC curves for copper(II) alginate (solid line) and copper(II)-doped L. digitata (dotted line) over the temperature range 50–400°C obtained with a heating rate (β) of 10°C min−1 under N2. (b) Comparison of DSC curves for unadulterated L. digitata (solid line) and copper(II)-doped L. digitata (dotted line) over the temperature range 50–400°C obtained with a heating rate (β) of 10°C min−1 under N2.
These results demonstrate the validity of using alginates as model compounds with which to predict the thermochemical behaviour of brown seaweed biomass. Thus, the kinetic parameters established in §3.1 can be used in the development of larger scale macroalgae processing operations, particularly in the modelling of low temperature slow pyrolysis or torrefaction as a pre-treatment in biomass gasification [60]. Clearly, however, much more work is required, predominantly in determination of the product stream and the effects of reaction conditions, before a more complete model can be used to analyse large scale thermochemical processes and the economic and energetic implications.
Together, the data presented here show that macroalgae that have been exposed to copper-enriched aqueous environments (such as in some industrial wastewater streams [61,62]) should be easier to pyrolyse than samples rich in alkali and alkaline earth metals. Indeed, it is conceivable that macroalgae could be used in the remediation of wastewater streams contaminated with other metals (such as cadmium) and then ion exchanged in a copper solution prior to pyrolysis. Of course, the exception to this proposition would be for macroalgae enriched in Pb2+ ions (for which alginates show an even higher affinity than for Cu2+ ions; figure 2) [63]. The effects of Pb2+ ions on macroalgae thermolysis will consequently make for an interesting comparison with Cu2+, but there is an inherent difficulty in such experiments owing to the toxicity of lead. Such studies, if achievable, may even help to shed light on the interactions between alginates and divalent cations.
4. Conclusions and outlook
The complex nature of the thermal behaviour of seaweeds demonstrated throughout this study indicates that their thermolysis pathways are not straightforward and that the TGA and DSC profiles encompass a myriad of diverse reactions. Thus the requirement to make comparative studies with model compounds is very relevant, as they can help to pinpoint the important factors necessary for the study of biomass pyrolysis without the complication of sample heterogeneity. In this respect, copper(II) alginate was found to be a convincing compound with which to model the effects of Cu2+ ions on a sample of brown macroalgae. Consequently, though only samples of L. digitata were examined, the agreement between the model study and the study using whole biomass suggests that the findings in this paper should be applicable to most brown (alginate-containing) macroalgae.
Here, Cu2+ ions have been found to have a dramatic impact on the thermal stability of polymeric alginic acid, promoting the onset of pyrolysis where other mono- and di-valent cations have been found to inhibit it. This effect is evidenced by a reduction in temperature of the onset of rapid pyrolysis of copper(II) alginate compared with the parent alginic acid that, as might be expected, is also accompanied by a lowering of the activation energies at various points in the conversion pathway. It is not accurate, however, to describe the copper as acting catalytically towards the pyrolysis of the alginic acid as, at elevated temperatures (more than 500°C), the Cu2+ ions clearly begin to inhibit conversion of the solid into volatile compounds. Indeed, with such a multitude of reactions taking place over the course of the pyrolysis process, the exact role of the copper is difficult to discern, but it clearly appears to destabilize the alginate polymer and, consequently, is beneficial during the early stages of pyrolysis, the region that is of most importance in the production of biofuels and chemicals.
Given the high affinity of alginates and, consequently, macroalgae for Cu2+ ions, it is anticipated that other samples of brown seaweed grown in or around copper-contaminated wastewater streams will demonstrate effects similar to those described above. This highlights the importance of establishing the metal profile of a sample of macroalgae prior to analysis, especially in the case of comparative studies, such as those that compare different species or the effects of different catalysts. It is likely that a greater understanding of the destabilizing effects of Cu2+ ions reported in this paper will be accompanied by a better understanding of the interaction of seaweed biomass with metal ions as a whole, which in turn opens the way to better utilization of macroalgae as a resource.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the Centre for Process Innovation, Durham University, and the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council for their financial support of this work. Thanks are owed to C. Patterson and Prof. N. Robinson of Durham University, for assistance with ICP-MS, R. Wout for advice on macroalgae collection and identification and D. Carswell for performing DSC analyses. The authors also thank E. J. Pickering and R. Cornell of the University of Cambridge for their help in obtaining TGA-FTIR data.
References
- 1.Giampietro M, Mayumi K. 2009. The biofuel delusion: the fallacy of large-scale agro-biofuel production. London, UK: Earthscan [Google Scholar]
- 2.Inderwildi O, King D. 2009. Quo vadis biofuels? Energy Environ. Sci. 2, 343–346 10.1039/b822951c (doi:10.1039/b822951c) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bridgwater AV. 2006. Biomass for energy. J. Sci. Food. Agric. 86, 1755–1768 10.1002/jsfa.2605 (doi:10.1002/jsfa.2605) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Goyal HB, Seal D, Saxena RC. 2008. Bio-fuels from thermochemical conversion of renewable resources: a review. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 12, 504–517 10.1016/j.rser.2006.07.014 (doi:10.1016/j.rser.2006.07.014) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mohan D, Pittman CU, Steele PH. 2006. Pyrolysis of wood/biomass for bio-oil: a critical review. Energy Fuels 20, 848–889 10.1021/ef0502397 (doi:10.1021/ef0502397) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Demiral I, Sensöz S. 2008. The effects of different catalysts on the pyrolysis of industrial wastes (olive and hazelnut bagasse). Bioresour. Technol. 99, 8002–8007 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.03.053 (doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2008.03.053) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Williams PT, Nugranad N. 2000. Comparison of products from the pyrolysis and catalytic pyrolysis of rice husks. Energy 25, 493–513 10.1016/S0360-5442(00)00009-8 (doi:10.1016/S0360-5442(00)00009-8) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Williams PT, Brindle AJ. 2002. Catalytic pyrolysis of tyres: influence of catalyst temperature. Fuel 81, 2425–2434 10.1016/S0016-2361(02)00196-5 (doi:10.1016/S0016-2361(02)00196-5) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Muradov N, Fidalgo B, Gujar AC, T-Raissi A. 2010. Pyrolysis of fast-growing aquatic biomass—Lemna minor (duckweed): characterization of pyrolysis products. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 8424–8428 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.05.089 (doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.05.089) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Inguanzo M, Domínguez A, Menéndez JA, Blanco CG, Pis JJ. 2002. On the pyrolysis of sewage sludge: the influence of pyrolysis conditions on solid, liquid and gas fractions. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 63, 209–222 10.1016/S0165-2370(01)00155-3 (doi:10.1016/S0165-2370(01)00155-3) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rowbotham JS, Dyer PW, Greenwell HC, Theodorou MK. 2012. Thermochemical processing of macroalgae: a late bloomer in the development of third-generation biofuels? Biofuels 3, 441–461 10.4155/bfs.12.29 (doi:10.4155/bfs.12.29) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ross AB, Jones JM, Kubacki M, Bridgeman T. 2008. Classification of macroalgae as fuel and its thermochemical behaviour. Bioresour. Technol. 99, 6494–6504 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.11.036 (doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2007.11.036) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Budarin VL, Zhao Y, Gronnow MJ, Shuttleworth PS, Breeden SW, Macquarrie DJ, Clark JH. 2011. Microwave-mediated pyrolysis of macroalgae. Green Chem. 13, 2330–2333 10.1039/c1gc15560a (doi:10.1039/c1gc15560a) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lewis J, Salam F, Slack N, Winton F, Hobson L. 2011. Product options for the processing of marine macro-algae. Summary report on behalf of the Crown Estate, CPI, Wilton, UK
- 15.Hardy G, Guiry MD. 2003. A check-list and atlas of the seaweeds of Britain and Ireland. London, UK: The British Phycological Society [Google Scholar]
- 16.Guiry MD, Blunden G. 1991. Seaweed resources in Europe: uses and potential. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd [Google Scholar]
- 17.Holdt SL, Kraan S. 2009. Bioactive compounds in seaweed: functional food applications and legislation. J. Appl. Phycol. 23, 543–597 10.1007/s10811-010-9632-5 (doi:10.1007/s10811-010-9632-5) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gao K, McKinley KR. 1994. Use of macroalgae for marine biomass production and CO2 remediation: a review. J. Appl. Phycol. 6, 45–60 10.1007/BF02185904 (doi:10.1007/BF02185904) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Aresta M, Dibenedetto A, Barberio G. 2005. Utilization of macroalgae for enhanced CO2 fixation and biofuels production: development of a computing software for an LCA study. Fuel Process. Technol. 85, 1679–1693 10.1016/j.fuproc.2005.01.016 (doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2005.01.016) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Woodward FN. 1951. The Scottish Seaweed Research Association. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 29, 719–725 10.1017/S0025315400052899 (doi:10.1017/S0025315400052899) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Marinho-Soriano E, Fonseca PC, Carneiro MAA, Moreira WSC. 2006. Seasonal variation in the chemical composition of two tropical seaweeds. Bioresour. Technol. 97, 2402–2406 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.10.014 (doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2005.10.014) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Black WAP. 1950. The seasonal variation in weight and chemical composition of the common British Laminariaceae. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 29, 45–72 10.1017/S0025315400056186 (doi:10.1017/S0025315400056186) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Adams JMM, Ross AB, Anastasakis K, Hodgson EM, Gallagher JA, Jones JM, Donnison IS. 2011. Seasonal variation in the chemical composition of the bioenergy feedstock Laminaria digitata for thermochemical conversion. Bioresour. Technol. 102, 226–234 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.152 (doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.152) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Anastasakis K, Ross AB, Jones JM. 2011. Pyrolysis behaviour of the main carbohydrates of brown macro-algae. Fuel 90, 598–607 10.1016/j.fuel.2010.09.023 (doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2010.09.023) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Williams PT, Horne PA. 1994. The role of metal salts in the pyrolysis of biomass. Renew. Energy 4, 1–13 10.1016/0960-1481(94)90058-2 (doi:10.1016/0960-1481(94)90058-2) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Nowakowski DJ, Jones JM, Brydson RMD, Ross AB. 2007. Potassium catalysis in the pyrolysis behaviour of short rotation willow coppice. Fuel 86, 2389–2402 10.1016/j.fuel.2007.01.026 (doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2007.01.026) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Fuentes M, Nowakowski D, Kubacki M, Cove J, Bridgeman T, Jones JM. 2008. Survey of influence of biomass mineral matter in thermochemical conversion of short rotation willow coppice. J. Energy Inst. 81, 234–241 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.01.031 (doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2011.01.031) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Li D, Chen L, Yi X, Zhang X, Ye N. 2010. Pyrolytic characteristics and kinetics of two brown algae and sodium alginate. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 7131–7136 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.03.145 (doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.03.145) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Daneshvar S, Salak F, Otsuka K. 2012. Macroalgae pyrolysis and its devolatilisation kinetics In 3rd Int. Conf. on Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, vol. 38, pp. 77–81 Singapore: IACSIT Press [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zhao H, Yan H, Liu M, Zhang C, Qin S. 2011. Pyrolytic characteristics and kinetics of the marine green tide macroalgae, Enteromorpha prolifera. Chin. J. Oceanol. Limnol. 29, 996–1001 10.1007/s00343-011-0095-6 (doi:10.1007/s00343-011-0095-6) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ross AB, Anastasakis K, Kubacki M, Jones JM. 2009. Investigation of the pyrolysis behaviour of brown algae before and after pre-treatment using PY-GC/MS and TGA. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 85, 3–10 10.1016/j.jaap.2008.11.004 (doi:10.1016/j.jaap.2008.11.004) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Larsen B, Salem DMSA, Sallam MAE, Mishrikey MM, Beltagy AI. 2003. Characterization of the alginates from algae harvested at the Egyptian Red Sea coast. Carbohydr. Res. 338, 2325–2336 10.1016/S0008-6215(03)00378-1 (doi:10.1016/S0008-6215(03)00378-1) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lee HW, Jeon JK, Park SH, Jeong KE, Chae HJ, Park YK. 2011. Catalytic pyrolysis of Laminaria japonica over nanoporous catalysts using Py-GC/MS. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 6, 500. 10.1186/1556-276X-6-500 (doi:10.1186/1556-276X-6-500) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wang J, Zhang M, Chen M, Min F, Zhang S, Ren Z, Yan Y. 2006. Catalytic effects of six inorganic compounds on pyrolysis of three kinds of biomass. Thermochim. Acta 444, 110–114 10.1016/j.tca.2006.02.007 (doi:10.1016/j.tca.2006.02.007) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Shi K, Shao S, Huang Q, Liang X, Jiang L, Li Y. 2011. Review of catalytic pyrolysis of biomass for bio-oil. Int. Conf. Mater. Renew. Energy Environ. 1, 317–321 10.1109/ICMREE.2011.5930821 (doi:10.1109/ICMREE.2011.5930821) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Davis TA, Volesky B, Mucci A. 2003. A review of the biochemistry of heavy metal biosorption by brown algae. Water Res. 37, 4311–4330 10.1016/S0043-1354(03)00293-8 (doi:10.1016/S0043-1354(03)00293-8) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Khairou KS. 2002. Kinetics and mechanism of the non-isothermal decomposition. I. Some divalent cross-linked metal-alginate ionotropic gels. J. Therm. Anal. 69, 583–588 10.1023/A:1019920108863 (doi:10.1023/A:1019920108863) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Said AA, Hassan RM. 1993. Thermal decomposition of some divalent metal alginate gel compounds. Polym. Deg. Stab. 39, 393–397 10.1016/0141-3910(93)90015-B (doi:10.1016/0141-3910(93)90015-B) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zaafarany IA. 2010. Non-isothermal decomposition of Al, Cr and Fe cross-linked trivalent metal-alginate complexes. J. King Abdul. Uni. 22, 193–202 10.4197/Sci.22-1.13 (doi:10.4197/Sci.22-1.13) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Said AA, Abd El-Wahab MMM, Hassan RM. 1994. Thermal and electrical studies on some metal alginate compounds. Thermochim. Acta 233, 13–24 10.1016/S0040-6031(99)80002-1 (doi:10.1016/S0040-6031(99)80002-1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zhang J, Ji Q, Shen X, Xia Y, Tan L, Kong Q. 2011. Pyrolysis products and thermal degradation mechanism of intrinsically flame-retardant calcium alginate fibre. Polym. Deg. Stab. 96, 936–942 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2011.01.029 (doi:10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2011.01.029) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Zhang J, Ji Q, Wang F, Tan L, Xia Y. 2012. Effects of divalent metal ions on the flame retardancy and pyrolysis products of alginate fibres. Polym. Deg. Stab. 97, 1034–1040 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.03.004 (doi:10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.03.004) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Pathak TS, Kim JS, Lee SJ, Baek DJ, Paeng KJ. 2008. Preparation of alginic acid and metal alginate from algae and their comparative study. J. Polym. Environ. 16, 198–204 10.1007/s10924-008-0097-4 (doi:10.1007/s10924-008-0097-4) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ross AB, Hall C, Anastasakis K, Westwood A, Jones JM, Crewe RJ. 2011. Influence of cation on the pyrolysis and oxidation of alginates. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 91, 344–351 10.1016/j.jaap.2011.03.012 (doi:10.1016/j.jaap.2011.03.012) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Black WAP, Mitchell RL. 1952. Trace elements in the common brown algae and in sea water. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 30, 575–584 10.1017/S0025315400012984 (doi:10.1017/S0025315400012984) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Rees DA. 1981. Polysaccharide shapes and their interactions: some recent advances. J. Pure Appl. Chem. 53, 1–14 10.1351/pac198153010001 (doi:10.1351/pac198153010001) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Haug A, Smidsrød O. 1970. Selectivity of some anionic polmers for divalent metal ions. Acta Chem. Scand. 24, 843–854 10.3891/acta.chem.scand.24-0843 (doi:10.3891/acta.chem.scand.24-0843) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Antunes WM, Luna AS, Henriques CA, da Costa ACA. 2003. An evaluation of copper biosorption by a brown seaweed under optimized conditions. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 6, 174–185 [Google Scholar]
- 49.Patrón-Prado M, Acosta-Vargas B, Serviere-Zaragoza E, Méndez-Rodríguez LC. 2010. Copper and cadmium biosorption by dried seaweed Sargassum sinicola in saline wastewater. Water Air Soil Pollut. 210, 197–202 10.1007/s11270-009-0241-3 (doi:10.1007/s11270-009-0241-3) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Balat M, Balat M, Kirtay E, Balat H. 2009. Main routes for the thermo-conversion of biomass into fuels and chemicals. I. Pyrolysis systems. Energy Convers. Manag. 50, 3147–3157 10.1016/j.enconman.2009.08.014 (doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2009.08.014) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Ledakowicz S, Stolarek P. 2002. Kinetics of biomass thermal decomposition. Chem. Pap. 56, 378–381 [Google Scholar]
- 52.Li D, Chen L, Zhang X, Ye N, Xing F. 2011. Pyrolytic characteristics and kinetic studies of three kinds of red algae. Biomass Bioenergy 35, 1765–1772 10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.01.01 (doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.01.01) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Li D, Chen L, Zhao J, Zhang X, Wang Q, Wang H, Naihao Y. 2010. Evaluation of the pyrolytic and kinetic characteristics of Enteromorpha prolifera as a source of renewable bio-fuel from the Yellow Sea of China. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 88, 647–652 10.1016/j.cherd.2009.10.011 (doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2009.10.011) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Orfao JJM, Antunes FJA, Figueiredo JL. 1999. Pyrolysis kinetics of lignocellulosic materials—three independent reactions model. Fuel 78, 49–58 10.1016/S0016-2361(98)00156-2 (doi:10.1016/S0016-2361(98)00156-2) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Demirbaş A. 2000. Mechanisms of liquefaction and pyrolysis reactions of biomass. Energy Convers. Manag. 41, 633–646 10.1016/S0196-8904(99)00130-2 (doi:10.1016/S0196-8904(99)00130-2) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Frost R, Ding Z, Kloprogge J, Martens W. 2002. Thermal stability of azurite and malachite in relation to the formation of mediaeval glass and glazes. Thermochim. Acta 390, 133–144 10.1016/S0040-6031(02)00127-2 (doi:10.1016/S0040-6031(02)00127-2) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Kim JW, Lee HG. 2001. Thermal and carbothermic decomposition of Na2CO3 and Li2CO3. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 32, 17–24 10.1007/s11663-001-0003-0 (doi:10.1007/s11663-001-0003-0) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Halikia I, Zoumpoulakis L, Christodoulou E, Prattis D. 2001. Kinetic study of the thermal decomposition of calcium carbonate by isothermal methods of analysis. Eur. J. Min. Process. Environ. Prot. 1, 89–102 [Google Scholar]
- 59.Heal GR. 2002. Thermogravimetry and derivative thermogravimetry. In Principles of thermal analysis and calorimetry (ed. Haines PJ.), ch. 2, pp. 10–54 Cambridge, UK: RSC [Google Scholar]
- 60.Chen Q, Zhou JS, Liu BJ, Mei QF, Luo ZY. 2011. Influence of torrefaction pretreatment on biomass gasification technology. Chinese Sci. Bull. 56, 1449–1456 10.1007/s11434-010-4292-z (doi:10.1007/s11434-010-4292-z) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Yu Q, Mathemickal JT, Yin P, Kaewsarn P. 1999. Heavy metal uptake capacities of common marine macro algal biomass. Water Res. 33, 1534–1537 10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00363-7 (doi:10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00363-7) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Dean JG, Bosqui FL, Lanouette KH. 1972. Removing heavy metals from waste water. Environ. Sci. Technol. 6, 518–522 10.1021/es60065a006 (doi:10.1021/es60065a006) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Vieira DM, da Costa ACA, Henriques CA, Cardoso VL, de Franca FP. 2007. Biosorption of lead by the brown seaweed Sargassum filipendula—batch and continuous pilot studies. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 10 10.2225/vol10-issue3-fulltext-3 (doi:10.2225/vol10-issue3-fulltext-3) [DOI] [Google Scholar]









