Abstract
Because adult lung tissue has limited regeneration capacity, lung transplantation is the primary therapy for severely damaged lungs. To explore whether lung tissue can be regenerated in vitro, we treated lungs from adult rats using a procedure that removes cellular components but leaves behind a scaffold of extracellular matrix that retains the hierarchical branching structures of airways and vasculature. We then used a bioreactor to culture pulmonary epithelium and vascular endothelium on the acellular lung matrix. The seeded epithelium displayed remarkable hierarchical organization within the matrix, and the seeded endothelial cells efficiently repopulated the vascular compartment. In vitro, the mechanical characteristics of the engineered lungs were similar to those of native lung tissue, and when implanted into rats in vivo for short time intervals (45 to 120 minutes) the engineered lungs participated in gas exchange. Although representing only an initial step toward the ultimate goal of generating fully functional lungs in vitro, these results suggest that repopulation of lung matrix is a viable strategy for lung regeneration.
Lung diseases account for some 400,000 deaths annually in the United States (1). Human lungs do not generally repair or regenerate beyond the microscopic, cellular level. Currently, the only way to replace lung tissue is to perform lung transplantation, which is an expensive procedure that achieves only 10 to 20% survival at 10 years and one that is hampered by a severe shortage of donor organs (2). Recently, techniques have been developed to quantitatively decellularize complex organs such as heart, liver, and kidney (3–5). Acellular matrices can provide attractive scaffolds for repopulation with lung-specific cells for lung engineering because the extracellular matrix template should contain appropriate three-dimensional (3D) architecture and regional-specific cues for cellular adhesion. To be functional in vivo, an engineered lung should (i) contain lung-specific cells, (ii) display the branching geometry of the airways and contain a perfusing microvasculature, (iii) provide barrier function to separate blood from air, and (iv) have mechanical properties that allow ventilation at physiological pressures.
Here, we describe our progress toward the construction of a functional tissue-engineered lung, using rat as a model system. Our approach is summarized in Fig. 1. We first decellularized native lung tissue in order to remove all immunogenic cellular constituents (Fig. 1, A and B). We found that after careful decellularization, the tissue retained its alveolar micro-architecture, its ability to function as a barrier to particulates, and its tissue mechanics. Repopulation of the acellular lung matrix with mixed populations of neonatal lung epithelial cells resulted in regional-specific epithelial seeding in correct anatomic locations. To enhance the survival and differentiation of lung epithelium, we cultured the matrix in a bioreactor designed to mimic certain features of the fetal lung environment, including vascular perfusion and liquid ventilation (Fig. 1, C and D) (6). Lastly, we tested the functionality of the engineered lung tissue by implanting it for short time periods in a syngeneic rat model (Fig. 1E).
Preparation of a decellularized lung scaffold
We harvested lung tissue from adult Fischer 344 rats and treated the lungs in the vascular and airway compartments with detergent solutions (Fig. 1 and movie S1). The decellularization solution contains 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate (CHAPS), a zwitterionic detergent, in a phosphate buffer at 1.0 M salt concentration (7). Vascular perfusion pressure was maintained below 20 mmHg, with total time of tissue exposure typically in the range of 2 to 3 hours. Analysis of the decellularized lung matrices by means of high-resolution micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) revealed intact lung architecture and an intact arterial tree and microvasculature (Fig. 2, A to C). The cells and nuclear material were removed with the decellularization process, but the alveolar septal architecture remained undisturbed (Fig. 2, E and F). Fluorometric DNA assay confirmed that approximately 99% of DNA was removed by the decellularization process (Fig. 2G), and immunoblotting for major histocompatibility complex I and II (MHC-I and MHC-II) as well as β-actin confirmed that decellularized lung matrices were depleted of these cellular markers (Fig. 2D). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) confirmed that alveolar cells, red blood cells, and cellular proteins present in native lung were absent in the decellularized scaffold (Fig. 2, H and I, and fig. S3). Analysis of the matrix by means of transmission electron microscopy (TEM) revealed that the ultrastructure of the alveolar septae and the delicate microvessels surrounding the alveoli remained intact (Fig. 2J and fig. S3). Immunofluorescence and histochemical staining indicated that collagen, elastin, and laminin were preserved in decellularized matrices (figs. S4 and S5). Additionally, quantitative assays showed that extracellular matrix collagen was preserved, whereas elastin was partially depleted by the decellularization process (40% of elastin remains in acellular matrices), and sulfated glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) were >90% removed (Fig. 2G and fig. S4). Hence, the lung decellularization protocol produces an acellular matrix scaffold that retains the gross, microstructural, and ultrastructural properties of native lung, yet removal of antigenic cellular components is essentially complete.
Properties of the lung bioreactor
The lung bioreactor contains a main reservoir in which the decellularized lung is mounted, using cannulae that are inserted into the trachea and pulmonary artery (fig. S1A). Culture medium is perfused into the pulmonary artery at physiological pressures (fig. S1B) (7). To provide negative-pressure ventilation of the engineered lung, a syringe pump withdraws a defined volume of air from the main bioreactor to create a negative pressure (Fig. 1C and figs. S1C and S2). Lung inflation under negative pressure is accompanied by inhalation of liquid medium from a trachea reservoir via a “breathing loop.” For exhalation, the syringe pump returns air to the main reservoir, causing lung exhalation of liquid medium into the trachea reservoir.
To repopulate the decellularized matrix, we injected cells into the vascular or airway compartments, or both, and maintained the matrix in culture for up to 8 days (Fig. 1C). This produced an engineered lung tissue that could then be removed from the bioreactor for further analysis or that could be orthotopically transplanted into a rat recipient (Fig. 1, D and E).
Repopulation of acellular matrix to produce an engineered lung
Seeding of the decellularized matrix with mixed populations of neonatal rat lung epithelial cells (fig. S7) into the airway compartment generally resulted in good adherence of the cells to alveolar structures, as well as to small- and medium-sized airways (Fig. 3A). Microvascular lung endothelial cells, when injected into the pulmonary artery of acellular scaffolds, adhered throughout the scaffold vasculature (Fig. 3B). Seeded pulmonary epithelial cells replicated rapidly and rarely displayed markers of apoptotic cell death (Fig. 3, C and D), despite the difficulty in culturing such cells on standard tissue culture plastic in vitro (8). This observation suggests that substrate cues on the acellular lung matrix are important for pulmonary epithelial cell attachment and replication.
In the biomimetic bioreactor, vascular perfusion greatly enhanced endothelial adhesion and survival on the lung matrix (fig. S9, A and B). Negative pressure ventilation had multiple beneficial effects on cultured lung epithelium, including enhanced survival of epithelium in distal alveoli and clearance of epithelial secretions from the airway tree (fig. S9, C to F). Clearance of airway secretions through ventilation indicates that the developing epithelium is in communication with the airway tree and is not growing randomly within the matrix. In addition, ventilation with air—as opposed to with culture medium—increased the numbers of type I alveolar epithelial cells, as well as the numbers of ciliated columnar epithelial cells (fig. S9, G to J). Engineered lungs also produce pro-surfactant proteins B and C (pro-SPB, pro-SPC), although we could not detect mature SPB (Fig. 3E). Surfactant proteins are critical for reducing alveolar surface tension and enabling lung inflation at physiologically normal pressures.
We performed compliance testing on the engineered lungs under quasi-static conditions by injecting air into the lungs and monitoring resultant pressure changes. Typical compliance curves for native lung, acellular matrix, and repopulated engineered lungs are shown in Fig. 3, F to H. The compliance values were, respectively, 0.35 ± 0.08 (n = 10 measures), 0.09 ± 0.02 (n = 4 measures), and 0.14 ± 0.06 (n = 5 measures) mL/mmHg (mean ± SD, P < 0.001 for difference between native and both decellularized and engineered compliances). Compliance values were measured at initial filling of the lungs (arrowheads in Fig. 3, F to H), and thus lower compliances for decellularized matrix and engineered lung mean that these two tissues have higher “opening pressures,” and less functional surfactant, than does native lung. Despite this difference, the overall stress-strain relationships and the ultimate tensile stresses were similar between the three groups (Fig. 3I and fig. S6). Thus, no substantial stiffening or weakening of the extracellular matrix occurs in the repopulated, engineered lungs as compared with native adult lungs.
To evaluate the distribution and phenotype of cells in the engineered lungs, we performed fluorescent immunohistochemical staining (fig. S8). Endothelial cells seeded into the vasculature were extensively distributed and expressed CD-31, as did comparable cells in native rat lung (fig. S8A). TEM analysis revealed the presence of tight junctions within the engineered endothelium, which is consistent with the development of some barrier function (fig. S10). With respect to the seeded lung epithelium, Clara cell secretory protein (CCSP)–positive cells, which in native lung are found in small airways, were found primarily in very small airway structures after 4 days and in larger structures after 8 days in engineered lungs (fig. S8B). Pro-SPC, a marker of type II alveolar epithelium, is normally present at the vertices of alveoli in native lung. In the engineered lungs, pro-SPC expression was diffuse in alveoli and in small airways after 4 days of culture, but at 8 days it showed a more native expression pattern at the vertices of alveoli (fig. S8C). In contrast, aquaporin-5—a specific marker for type I epithelium—was found diffusely throughout native alveoli and in engineered lungs after 4 days but was largely absent after 8 days (fig. S8D). This observation is consistent with previous work on neonatal rat development, which showed that type I cells do not fully differentiate until the post-natal period, when air breathing commences (9). Indeed, engineered lungs that were ventilated with air, as opposed to liquid culture medium, displayed more aquaporin-5 expression in alveoli after 8 days of culture (fig. S9, G and H) and also contained sparse ciliated epithelial cells (fig. S9, I and J). Additional cell types noted included mesenchymal cells and the airway epithelial progenitor basal cells (fig. S8, E and F). Hence, the engineered lungs contained many of the important cell types of native lung tissues. In addition, the spatial distribution of the various cell types was regional-specific, and with extended culture periods in the bioreactor the overall pattern of cellular distribution and differentiation became more similar to that in native lung tissue.
To determine whether the decellularization and repopulation methodologies used in our studies of rat lungs were applicable to human tissues, we obtained human lung segments from a tissue bank and treated them with decellularization solutions for up to 6 hours (7). Histological staining showed that complete cellular removal was achieved, with preservation of alveolar architecture (fig. S11, A and B). We seeded the acellular matrices with A549 human epithelial carcinoma cells and endothelial cells derived from human cord-blood endothelial progenitor cells (7). The A549 cells adhered well to alveolar surfaces, and the endothelial cells adhered to the vasculature (fig. S11, C and D), supporting the notion that these approaches may also be applicable to human lung tissues.
Implantation of engineered lungs into rats
To determine whether engineered rodent lungs were implantable and functional for gas exchange, we performed orthotopic left lung transplantation in four animals (7). Acellular matrices were seeded with neonatal rat lung epithelium and lung microvascular endothelium and cultured for approximately 1 week in the bioreactor. For lung implantation, the native lungs were exposed via left thoracotomy, and the left lung was excised. After anticoagulation with heparin, the left mainstem bronchus, left pulmonary vein, and left pulmonary artery of the engineered lung were anastomosed to the recipient, the lung was ventilated with 100% oxygen, and blood flow was reestablished.
In all cases, the engineered lungs were easily suturable to the recipient and were ventilated with no visible air leak from the parenchyma (Fig. 4A and movie S2). All engineered lungs became perfused with blood over a period of seconds to minutes, with blood visibly turning from dark to bright red as the hemoglobin became oxygenated. Implantation times for engineered lungs ranged from 45 min to 2 hours. After perfusion and ventilation, blood gas samples were drawn from the pulmonary artery, left and right pulmonary veins (veins were clamped and samples drawn from each lung individually), and the unclamped pulmonary vein so as to document the extent of gas exchange occurring in the native and engineered lungs (Table 1).
Table 1.
Sample location | pH | PO2 (mmHg) | O2 Sat (%) | PCO2 (mmHg) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Pulmonary artery | 7.30 ± 0.06 | 27 ± 7 | 44 ± 20 | 41 ± 13 |
Right pulmonary vein | 7.53 ± 0.08 | 634 ± 69 | 100 ±0 | 20 ± 1 |
Left (implant) pulmonary vein | 7.68 ± 0.28 | 283 ± 48 | 100 ± 0 | 11 ± 5 |
Mixed pulmonary veins | 7.58 ± 0.08 | 495 ± 174 | 100 ± 0 | 18 ± 3 |
Chest x-ray confirmed that the engineered lung was inflated with air, but the level of inflation was less than that of the native right lung (Fig. 4B). Histological evaluation of explanted engineered lungs revealed red blood cells in large blood vessels and septal microvessels, and some bleeding into airways, although this was modest (Fig. 4C). Blood gas analysis revealed that the tissue-engineered lungs were effective in exchanging oxygen and carbon dioxide (Table 1). Partial pressures of oxygen (PO2) increased from 27 ± 7 mmHg in the pulmonary artery to 283 ± 48 mmHg in the left pulmonary vein, indicating complete hemoglobin saturation and oxygenation. Hemoglobin saturation was 100% for both engineered left lung and native right lung venous samples. In addition, carbon dioxide removal was efficient, with CO2 falling from 41 ± 13 mmHg in the pulmonary artery to 11 ± 5 mmHg in the left, engineered pulmonary vein. Although the PO2 in the right pulmonary vein was higher than in the left (634 ± 69 versus 283 ± 48 mmHg), this difference may not be of substantial physiological consequence because hemoglobin saturation is complete above oxygen pressures of 100 mmHg (10).
Discussion
To date, cell therapy and tissue engineering have been applied less extensively to lung than to other tissues and organs (11–13). Many efforts in lung regeneration have involved synthetic scaffolds or simple in vitro culture systems. Such systems can regenerate certain microscopic features of alveolar architecture but have not yet produced tissue that can participate in gas exchange (14, 15). Use of the decellularization paradigm for respiratory tissue was described in 2008, when Macchiarini and colleagues implanted a reseeded tracheal matrix into a patient with severe bronchomalacia (16).
In the current work, we have demonstrated the feasibility of producing an engineered lung that displays much of the microarchitecture of native lung and that can effect gas exchange for short periods of time when implanted into rats. Although these results are encouraging, multiple issues remain to be addressed before long-term engineered lung function can be realized. For example, alveolar barrier function must be improved so as to prevent any leakage of blood components into the airways. This can be accomplished through iterative improvement in the decellularization procedure in order to minimize alveolar septal damage (17). Production of surfactant should be increased (18), and differentiated columnar ciliated epithelium should be enhanced by more prolonged air breathing in culture (19). In addition, the efficiency of vascular endothelial coverage must be very high throughout the engineered lung vasculature. This is to prevent exposure of collagen-containing basement membrane to the circulation, with consequent thrombosis, because some clotting was noted at explant. Lastly, a decellularization strategy for lung regeneration will only become clinically useful when a suitable, autologous source of pulmonary epithelium can be identified, such as a resident lung stem cell or induced pluripotent stem cell (20–24).
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank M. Colehour for help with bioreactor development and Western blotting, R. Homer for histologic assessment, and B. Stripp for the CCSP antibody. This work was funded by Yale University Department of Anesthesia and by NIH grant HL 098220 (to L.E.N.). T.H.P. is supported by NIH T32 GM007171. L.E.N. holds stock in Humacyte, a regenerative medicine company. The authors (L.E.N., T.H.P., and E.A.C.) and Yale University have filed a patent application related to tissue engineering of lungs.
Footnotes
Supporting Online Material www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/science.1189345/DC1 Materials and Methods SOM Text Figs. S1 to S11 Table S1 References
References and Notes
- 1.American Lung Association [accessed 4 March 2010];Lung Disease Data 2008. www.lungusa.org.
- 2.Orens JB, Garrity ER., Jr. Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2009;6:13. doi: 10.1513/pats.200807-072GO. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ott HC, et al. Nat. Med. 2008;14:213. doi: 10.1038/nm1684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gilbert TW, Sellaro TL, Badylak SF. Biomaterials. 2006;27:3675. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Baptista PM, et al. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2009;31:6526. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2009.5333145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Inanlou MR, Baguma-Nibasheka M, Kablar B. Histol. Histopathol. 2005;20:1261. doi: 10.14670/HH-20.1261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Materials and methods are available as supporting material on Science Online.
- 8.Sporty JL, Horálková L, Ehrhardt C. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 2008;4:333. doi: 10.1517/17425255.4.4.333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Massaro D, Teich N, Maxwell S, Massaro GD, Whitney P. J. Clin. Invest. 1985;76:1297. doi: 10.1172/JCI112103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Staub NC. In: Physiology. Berne RM, Levy MN, editors. Vol. 4. Mosby; St. Louis: 1998. chaps. 32 and 33. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Andrade CF, Wong AP, Waddell TK, Keshavjee S, Liu M. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2007;292:L510. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00175.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cortiella J, et al. Tissue Eng. 2006;12:1213. doi: 10.1089/ten.2006.12.1213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mondrinos MJ, et al. Tissue Eng. 2006;12:717. doi: 10.1089/ten.2006.12.717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sugihara H, Toda S, Miyabara S, Fujiyama C, Yonemitsu N. Am. J. Pathol. 1993;142:783. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lin YM, Boccaccini AR, Polak JM, Bishop AE, Maquet V. J. Biomater. Appl. 2006;21:109. doi: 10.1177/0885328206057952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Macchiarini P, et al. Lancet. 2008;372:2023. [Google Scholar]
- 17.DeFouw DO. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 1983;127:S9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bittar EE. Pulmonary Biology in Health and Disease. Springer; New York: 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gray TE, Guzman K, Davis CW, Abdullah LH, Nettesheim P. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 1996;14:104. doi: 10.1165/ajrcmb.14.1.8534481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wang D, Morales JE, Calame DG, Alcorn JL, Wetsel RA. Mol. Ther. 2010;18:625. doi: 10.1038/mt.2009.317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Yu J, et al. Science. 2007;318:1917. doi: 10.1126/science.1151526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kim CF, et al. Cell. 2005;121:823. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.03.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Rippon HJ, et al. Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2008;5:717. doi: 10.1513/pats.200801-008AW. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Roszell B, et al. Tissue Eng. Part A. 2009;15:3351. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2008.0664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.