Abstract
Neuroblastoma (NB) is the second most common solid pediatric tumor and is characterized by clinical and biological heterogeneity, and stage-IV of the disease represents 50% of all cases. Considering the limited success of present chemotherapy treatment, it has become necessary to find new and effective therapies. In this context, our approach consists of identifying and targeting key molecular pathways associated with NB chemoresistance. This study has been carried out on three stage-IV NB cell lines with different status of MYCN amplification. Cells were exposed to a standard chemotherapy agent, namely etoposide, either alone or in combination with particular drugs, which target intracellular signaling pathways. Etoposide alone induced a concentration-dependent reduction of cell viability and, at very high doses, totally counteracted cell tumorigenicity and neurosphere formation. In addition, etoposide activated p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), AKT and c-Jun N-terminal kinase. Pre-treatment with SB203580, a p38MAPK inhibitor, dramatically sensibilized NB cells to etoposide, strongly reducing the dosage needed to inhibit tumorigenicity and neurosphere formation. Importantly, SB203580–etoposide cotreatment also reduced cell migration and invasion by affecting cyclooxygenase-2, intercellular adhesion molecule-1, C–X–C chemokine receptor-4 and matrix metalloprotease-9. Collectively, our results suggest that p38MAPK inhibition, in combination with standard chemotherapy, could represent an effective strategy to counteract NB resistance in stage-IV patients.
Keywords: MAPK, neuroblastoma, etoposide
Neuroblastoma (NB) is the second most common pediatric solid malignant tumor and is characterized by biological and clinical heterogeneity.1, 2 While low-risk NB may spontaneously regress or differentiate into benign ganglioneuroblastoma, high-risk NB (stage-IV) results in metastatic dissemination3 and only 20% of patients survive 5 years from diagnosis in spite of aggressive chemotherapy.4
Current therapeutic stratification of patients with NB is based on risk assessment according to combinations of age, tumor stage, MYCN status, DNA ploidy status and histopathology. This biological heterogeneity renders it necessary to identify additional markers for stratification and prognostication, as well as molecular pathways that can be targeted in combination with standard chemotherapy. However, the efficacy of the single-agent therapy is limited by mechanisms of resistance that hinder its clinical success. A factor that contributes to the malignancy of NB is the presence of a sub-population of chemo- and radio-resistant stem cells in the tumor bulk.5 These cancer stem-like cells (CSCs) contribute to both cancer progression and metastases. In NB, in fact, neurospheres (NBSs), the CSCs of neuronal origin, have been found in primary tumor specimens, as well as in established cell lines.6
Moreover, it has been demonstrated that therapy-resistant aggressive NBs frequently overexpress and secrete high levels of growth factors and chemokines,7 which are able to activate growth signaling pathways, thereby providing a suitable microenvironment for tumor development.8, 9
In this study, we analyzed the main survival and death pathways triggered by etoposide, a commonly used chemotherapeutic compound, in two MYCN-amplified and one non-amplified cell lines. In particular, our study was strongly focused on HTLA-230, one of the MYCN-amplified NB cell lines, isolated from the bone-marrow aspirate of a patient with the stage-IV disease.10 These cells are highly tumorigenic11 and phenotypically similar to other metastatic bone marrow-isolated NB cells.12
Our results demonstrate that the etoposide resistance of NB cells is due to the presence of NBSs and suggest that SB203580, a specific p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) inhibitor, in combination with etoposide, may be effective in preventing cell growth, invasion, migration, angiogenesis and NBS generation, which are all factors responsible for the relapse and progression of NB.
Results
Etoposide induces a dose-dependent reduction of cell viability and high doses totally counteract the tumorigenicity of NB cells and the formation of NBSs
NB cells were exposed for 24 h to increasing concentrations of etoposide (0.07–225 μM). As shown in Figure 1a, etoposide induced a dose-dependent reduction of cell viability, starting at a 10 μM concentration and reaching a 70% decrease at 225 μM. As shown in Figure 1b (left panel), untreated cells were able to form colonies (68 colonies of >50 cells). Similarly, NB cells exposed for 24 h to 1.25 μM etoposide, a concentration that mimics in vitro the dose used in clinical therapy,13 formed colonies (44 colonies of >50 cells). On the contrary, higher doses of etoposide (from 10 to 225 μM) totally suppressed the clonogenicity of these cells.
Since the anchorage-independent growth is useful in detecting colonies, not appreciated by a clonogenic assay,14 cells treated for 24 h with etoposide were grown in a semisolid agar. Similarly, as shown in Figure 1b (right panel), colonies were detected only in untreated samples (25 colonies of >25 cells) and in 1.25 μM etoposide samples (16 colonies of >25 cells).
When cells were plated above the clonal density (10 cells per μl) and grown under appropriate conditions, many NBSs were observed within 1 week in both untreated and 1.25 μM etoposide-treated cells (Figure 1c). Interestingly, the quantity of NBSs increased with the passage number (Figure 1c), but higher doses of etoposide (10–100 μM) prevented the formation of NBSs, already during the first week (Figure 1c).
As shown in Figure 1d, untreated and etoposide-treated monolayer cells expressed CD133 and Oct4, known stem cell markers.15 Moreover, in NBSs, at the eighth passage, either originating from the control or from the treated cells, CD133 increased twofold, whereas Oct4 increased by 40 and 85% in untreated and treated NBSs, respectively (Figure 1d).
Since the effects on cell viability and clonogenicity, induced by 100 μM etoposide, were comparable to that induced by the higher doses, the subsequent analyses were performed until 100 μM.
At 24 h of treatment of cells with etoposide (10–100 μM) induced a dose-dependent increase of apoptotic cells and a necrotic effect was observed at 50 and 100 μM etoposide.
Etoposide produced a dose-dependent increase in dichlorofluorescein (DCF)-positive cells that became fivefold higher at 100 μM, and γ-H2AX, a marker of DNA double-strand breaks, was induced in etoposide-treated cells (data not shown).
Etoposide activates p38MAPK, AKT and JNK
As shown in Figure 2a, 24-h etoposide increased protein kinase C (PKC)δ and reduced PKCα levels. By analyzing the downstream molecular pathways of PKC, etoposide induced a dose-dependent activation of p38MAPK, already at 1.25 μM (Figure 2b, left panel). In addition, c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) was activated by 60 and 30%, at 1.25 and 10 μM, respectively, but no effect was observed at the other concentrations (Figure 2b, right panel). Moreover, etoposide increased the activity of Akt (phospho-Thr-Akt/Akt) by 70% in cells treated with the dose of 1.25 μM and by 50 and 35% (phospho-Ser-Akt/Akt), respectively, in cells exposed to 50 and 100 μM (Figure 2b, lower panel).
SB203580/etoposide cotreatment decreases cell viability, reduces the clonogenicity and inhibits the formation of NBSs
Since all signaling molecules analyzed were already activated at 1.25 μM etoposide, the effects of specific enzymatic inhibitors were investigated at this concentration of etoposide. As shown in Figure 3a (left panel), a reduction of cell viability was observed when etoposide-treated cells were pre-exposed to LY290042 (phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI-3-kinase)/Akt inhibitor; 15% decrease), to SB203580 (p38MAPK inhibitor; 17% decrease) and to SP600125 (JNK inhibitor; 30% decrease). As shown in Figure 3a (right panel), while PD98059 (MEK inhibitor) pre-treatment increased the ability of NB cells to form colonies in the presence of etoposide, surprisingly, pre-treatment with SB203580 markedly reduced the tumorigenicity of etoposide-treated cells (60% decrease).
Treatment with the inhibitors that affected cell viability and tumorigenicity did not alter per se the number of NBSs (data not shown). As shown in Figure 3b, etoposide did not modify the number of NBSs, even in the presence of pre-treatment with LY290042 or SP600125 (first passage). However, when cells were pre-treated with SB203580 and then exposed to etoposide, the formation of NBSs was totally absent, even from the first passage (Figure 3b).
In addition, the progressive increase in NBSs observed in untreated, etoposide- and cotreated cells was dependent on passages and lasted for a period of 5 weeks (Figure 3b). After 6 weeks, the cotreatments did not change the number of NBSs (Figure 3b).
In the NBSs originating from untreated and etoposide-treated cells, p38MAPK was activated 18-fold compared with monolayer cells (Figure 3c, left panel), whereas the expression of MAPK phosphatase-1 (MKP-1), p38MAPK inhibitor, did not change (Figure 3c, right panel).
SB203580/etoposide or SP600125/etoposide cotreatments inhibit the formation of capillary-like structures
The ability of NB cells to form a network of tubes was not modified by etoposide or LY290042 after 24 h treatment (Figure 4a). Instead, SB203580 and SP600125 alone decreased the number of branches in the tube network by 55% with regard to untreated cells (Figure 4a, graph).
While the association of LY290042 with etoposide did not alter the formation of tubes, the cotreatment with SB203580 or SP600125 decreased the number of branches by 90% with regard to etoposide-treated cells (Figure 4a, graph). Moreover, tubes formed by untreated, etoposide- or LY290042-treated and cotreated cells persisted for up to 3 days. Similar results were observed in cells incubated in medium without basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (data not shown).
Furthermore, SB203580, alone or in combination with etoposide, reduced VEGF by 61 and 69%, respectively (Figure 4b). SP600125 alone was able to increase the VEGF amount twofold, but its combination with etoposide did not modify the VEGF expression (Figure 4b).
SB203580/etoposide cotreatment reduces cell migration and invasion by affecting COX-2, ICAM-1, CXCR4 expression and MMP-9 secretion
Cell migration was not altered by etoposide (Figure 4c) or by LY290042 or SB203580 or SP600125 administered alone (data not shown). Similarly, cotreatments of etoposide with LY290042 or SP600125 did not affect the cell migration (data not shown). It is worth noting that pre-treatment with SB203580 was able to reduce cell migration by 65% and 50%, evaluated by the scratch and Transwell assays, respectively (Figure 4c).
Cell invasion was reduced by 33% after etoposide treatment and was further inhibited by 51% and 80% after LY290042 and SB203580 cotreatments, respectively (Figure 4d). Moreover, SP600125 cotreatment did not change the number of membrane-invading cells (Figure 4d). LY290042 or SB203580 alone reduced the cell invasion by 34% and 60%, respectively, while SP600125 per se was uneffective (data not shown).
Considering the effects induced by SB203580 cotreatment on cell migration and invasion, some molecular markers, known to be related to the invasive phenotype, were investigated.
As shown in Figure 5a, etoposide induced a 60% increase in the cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 levels, an effect that was totally inhibited by the pre-treatment with SB203580. Moreover, treatment with SB203580 alone did not modify the COX-2 levels in untreated cells (Figure 5a).
Intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) was reduced by 25% after etoposide and by 65% after SB203580 alone with regard to untreated cells (Figure 5b). Moreover, SB203580 cotreatment reduced the ICAM-1 levels found after etoposide by 40% (Figure 5b).
As shown in Figure 5c, etoposide or SB203580 alone did not alter the C–X–C chemokine receptor-4 (CXCR4) levels, while cotreatment was able to decrease the CXCR4 by 60%.
Analyses of matrix metalloprotease (MMP) activity demonstrated that MMP-9 was secreted by untreated cells (Figure 5d). In addition, etoposide or SB203580 alone did not influence the MMP-9 secretion (Figure 5d). However, etoposide/SB203580 cotreatments reduced the release of MMP-9 by 33% (Figure 5d).
SB203580/etoposide decreases the viability of SK-N-SH and IMR-32 cells, reduces their tumorigenicity and inhibits the NBS formation only in IMR-32 cells
As shown in Figure 6a, etoposide induced a dose-dependent decrease in cell viability of SK-N-SH (without MYCN amplification) and of IMR-32 (with MYCN amplification). However, while the IMR-32 cell response to etoposide treatment was similar to that of HTLA-230 cells, SK-N-SH cells were more sensitive to the drug. In fact, 24-h etoposide, already at 1.25 μM, induced a reduction (of 30%) in cell viability of SK-N-SH (Figure 6a).
In addition, as shown in Figure 6b, the pretreatment of SK-N-SH with SB203580 caused a reduction of cell viability of 50% in regard to etoposide-treated cells, and sensitized IMR-32 cells, resistant to etoposide, by inducing a decrease of 48% in cell viability.
As shown in Figure 6c, etoposide alone decreased the number of colonies by 60% and 90% in SK-N-SH and IMR-32 cells, respectively. Moreover, in IMR-32 cells, SB203580 alone affected clonogenicity by reducing the clogenicity by 35% (Figure 6c). In both cell lines, the pre-treatment with SB203580 further reduced the tumorigenicity induced by etoposide (Figure 6c).
Untreated SK-N-SH and IMR-32 cells generated NBSs already within 1 week, and for each passage, the number of NBSs was equal to 30% of that originating from HTLA-230 (data not shown).
Etoposide or SB203580 alone totally inhibited the formation of NBSs in SK-N-SH but did not alter the number of NBSs in IMR-32 (data not shown). However, when IMR-32 cells were cotreated with SB203580 and etoposide, the formation of NBSs was totally prevented, even from the first passage (data not shown). As shown in Figure 6d, untreated and etoposide-treated monolayer SK-N-SH and IMR-32 cells expressed CD133 and Oct4 stem markers. Moreover, in NBSs, at the eighth passage, CD133 was markedly decreased (80–90%), whereas Oct4 did not change (Figure 6d).
In NBSs, originating from SK-N-SH and IMR-32 untreated cells, an activation of p38MAPK 7- and 11-fold, respectively, was found in comparison to the monolayer cells (Figure 6e). Furthermore, in the NBSs from etoposide-treated IMR-32 cells, p38MAPK was activated eightfold compared with monolayer etoposide-treated ones (Figure 6e). No change in MKP-1 was observed (data not shown).
SB203580 plus etoposide decreases VEGF levels, markedly reduces cell migration/invasion and MMP-9 secretion
SK-N-SH and IMR-32 cells were unable to form capillary-like structures (Figure 7a). However, in these cell lines, etoposide alone reduced VEGF by 30% in SK-N-SH and by 15% in IMR-32 cells (Figure 7b). Similarly, SB203580 decreased VEGF by 38% in SK-N-SH and by 48% in IMR-32 cells (Figure 7b). In addition, SB203580, in combination with etoposide, further reduced VEGF by 20% and 50% in SK-N-SH and IMR-32 cells, respectively (Figure 7b).
As shown in Figure 7c, cotreatment of SB203580 with etoposide was able to reduce the cell migration of SK-N-SH by 77% and of IMR-32 cells by 40%, respectively (Figure 7c). In addition, etoposide and SB203580 alone were able to reduce cell migration of SK-N-SH by 45% and 40%, respectively (Figure 7c, left panel).
SB203580 alone or in combination with etoposide decreased by 80–83% the invasiveness of both cell lines (Figure 7d).
As shown in Figure 7e (left panel), etoposide or SB203580 alone reduced the secretion of MMP-9 from SK-N-SH cells by 30% and 75%, respectively. In IMR-32, etoposide did not influence the MMP-9 secretion (Figure 7e, right panel), while SB203580 alone reduced the MMP-9 release by 60% (Figure 7e, right panel). However, etoposide plus SB203580 reduced the release of MMP-9 by 22% in SK-N-SH and by 42% in IMR-32, with regard to cells treated with etoposide alone (Figure 7e).
Discussion
In this paper, we demonstrate that HTLA-230 and IMR-32, both MYCN-amplified cells, are highly etoposide-resistant, as only the doses ranging from 10 to 225 μM are able to reduce cell survival. In addition, HTLA-230 are more resistant than IMR-32 because 1.25 μM etoposide, a concentration that in vitro mimics the dose used in clinical therapy,13 exerts a less marked antitumorigenic effect on HTLA-230, whereas the same dose of etoposide strongly decreases the clonogenicity of IMR-32 cells.
However, all NB cells analyzed are able to generate NBSs, but only in cells with MYCN-amplification, the treatment with etoposide does not interfere with NBS formation. These results are in agreement with a paper demonstrating that NBS-derived cells, originating from pediatric brain tumors, have an increased resistance to etoposide compared with monolayer-derived cells.16 In addition, it has been demonstrated that only NB stage-IV-derived cells generate spheres, but that the MYCN expression status is not related to the sphere formation.17
In this paper, we demonstrate that in NBSs, originating from HTLA-230 cells, the levels of stemness markers (CD133 and Oct4) are enhanced, while in NBSs, originating from SK-N-SH and IMR-32 cells, the expression of CD133 is reduced and Oct4 do not change. These results are in line with a report demonstrating that CD133 expression is increased in spheres but not in every analyzed sphere derived from NB samples and cell lines.17, 18 Probably, the overexpression of stemness markers contributes to rendering HTLA-230 more resistant to etoposide, and in this regard, it has been demonstrated that CD133 expression in NB cells is associated with resistance to doxorubicin, vincristine and cisplatin.19
In accordance with other studies,20 we have recently reported that etoposide causes DNA damage and an overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS),21 which have been demonstrated to mediate both cell damage and biological functions.22 In this regard, herein we show that etoposide induces a dose-dependent increase in the levels of the proapoptotic PKCδ23 and a parallel decrease of PKCα, the antiapoptotic isoform.24
However, given that PKCs are upstream molecules in the ROS signaling pathway leading to DNA damage and apoptosis,21, 25, 26 it is important to identify the downstream mediators of the NB response to etoposide and we show that etoposide induces the activation of Akt and MAPKs (i.e. JNK, and p38). It is worth noting that the activation of MAPKs has been reported in over 50% of acute myelogenous and lymphocytic leukemia and that MAPKs are also stimulated in other tumors,27, 28 therefore implying that the inhibition of the MAPK pathways could represent an important strategy to counteract tumor growth. In this context, our results demonstrate that the viability of HTLA-230 exposed to 1.25 μM etoposide is reduced by the cotreatment with MAPKs and Akt inhibitors.
Moreover, cotreatment with etoposide and SB203580, a specific p38MAPK inhibitor, markedly reduces the tumorigenicity, while PD98059, an inhibitor of MEK, increases the ability to form colonies. These findings are in line with studies demonstrating, on the one hand, that p38MAPK activation plays a key role in tumorigenicity29 and, on the other hand, that PD98059 fails to reduce the toxicity of etoposide.30
For the first time, we have demonstrated that SB203580, synergizing with etoposide, totally inhibits the formation of NBSs. This is probably related to the evidence that NBSs originating from MYCN-amplified cells have higher levels of p38MAPK activity in comparison to the same cells grown in monolayer and to NBSs originating from MYCN non-amplified cells. To confirm the fundamental role played by p38MAPK activation in CSC generation and propagation, the role of MKP-1, an endogenous inhibitor of MAPKs,31 was investigated with the result that, in NBS cells, no changes were observed in MKP-1. Recently, it has also been demonstrated that p38MAPK activity enhances the expression of a specific subset of Oct4 target genes.32 In this regard, SB203580 plus etoposide does not allow the formation of NBSs, probably due to its acting on CD133 and Oct4. Moreover, it has been found that CD133-positive cells maintain self-renewal and CSC-like properties by involving Oct4,15 whose transcript is detected in many human carcinomas,33 including NB.11
Noteworthy is that our data confirm previous evidence indicating that the p38 kinase is involved in the production of VEGF34 and in VEGF-induced endothelial migration.35 An additional mechanism of tumor angiogenesis is represented by the vascular mimicry whereby cancer cells may acquire features that are typical of endothelial cells.36 Recently, Pezzolo et al.11 have suggested that targeting the ability of HTLA-230 cells to transform into endothelial-like cells may counteract the contribution of NB-derived endothelial cells to tumor relapse and chemoresistance.11 To our knowledge, our work is the first that demonstrates that the ability of untreated and treated HTLA-230 cells to acquire the typical features of endothelial cells is strongly reduced by p38MAPK and JNK inhibition. Moreover, our results demonstrate that p38MAPK inhibition decreases VEGF expression in all NB cells analyzed, suggesting that p38MAPK regulated VEGF via an MYCN-independent mechanism. However, considering that only SB203580 reduces VEGF in etoposide-treated cells, while both SB203580 and SP600125 inhibit vascular mimicry, it is possible that p38MAPK and JNK inhibitors may act by modulating other growth factors and matrix-related components.37
The p38MAPK pathway is known to regulate cancer development by modulating not only angiogenesis but also cell motility and invasion. In this context, our results demonstrate that migration and invasiveness of etoposide-treated NB cells is dependent on p38MAPK and also suggest that the inhibition of this pathway could be a new strategy in limiting the invasiveness of stage-IV NB. Accordingly, it has been demonstrated that SB203580 negatively affects, in vivo, breast cancer cell invasiveness,38 whereas in vitro studies show that migration and invasion of bladder and hepatocarcinoma cells are linked to p38MAPK activity.39, 40
Growing evidence also demonstrates that CXCR4, the chemokine stromal-derived factor 1 (SDF1/CXCL12) receptor, plays a key role in NB biology41 and exerts a promigratory effect by activating p38MAPK.42 Another modulator of the cancer invasiveness, whose expression is associated with the activation of MAPKs, is COX-2, (ref. 43,44,45) which increases migration and modulates the expression of the ICAM-1, an inducible surface glycoprotein that mediates adhesion-dependent cell-to-cell interactions.46 In this regard, we have demonstrated that in HTLA-230 cells, etoposide markedly increases COX-2 expression according to the evidence that chemo/radiotherapies induce COX-2 in cancer.47 On the other hand, etoposide reduces ICAM-1 and, although it does not affect cell survival, markedly reduces the cell invasiveness.
Probably, the effect of etoposide is the result of a balance between the increased expression of COX-2, linked to a major survival and migratory ability, and the reduced ICAM-1 expression, leading to a reduction of the metastatic potential of tumor cells. The cotreatment of etoposide with SB203580, by downregulating the expression of both proteins, on the one hand, determines a cytotoxic and antiangiogenetic effect and, on the other hand, reduces the invasive and metastatic properties. The demonstration that p38MAPK may regulate NB cell migration and invasiveness is confirmed by the inhibitory effect of SB203580 on the MMP-9 activity.
Therefore, these results strongly suggest that the combination of etoposide with SB203580 might be effective in blocking tumor growth and metastases.
Some preclinical studies have demonstrated that SB203580 is pharmacologically active in vivo in several animal models and is a potent inhibitor of cytokine production with only minor effects on the immune system.48 Several p38 inhibitors tested for the treatment of inflammatory diseases have been well tolerated with minimal side effects.49 Of particular note, there is increasing evidence that the different proinflammatory chemokines are implicated in the growth and invasivity of NB.50
In conclusion, we believe that, due to the dual activity on cancer cells and tumor microenvironment, standard chemotherapy combined with p38 inhibitors could represent a successful therapeutic strategy for the treatment of stage-IV NB.
Materials and Methods
Materials
Etoposide, chelerythrine chloride, LY2940042 and PD98059 were obtained from Calbiochem (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). SB203580 and SP600125 were from Sigma Chemicals Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Matrigel (basement membrane matrix) was from Becton, Dickinson and Company (Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA).
Cell cultures and treatments
The MYCN-amplified human stage-IV NB cell lines, HTLA-230 and IMR-32, and the MYCN-non-amplified stage-IV SK-N-SH cells were obtained from Dr. V Pistoia (G Gaslini Institute, Genoa, Italy). The cell line was tested for mycoplasma contamination (Mycoplasma Reagent Set; Euroclone s.p.a, Pavia, Italy). Cell morphology and proliferation were analyzed after thawing and within eight passages in culture. Cells were cultured in RPMI1640 (Euroclone) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Euroclone), 2 mM glutamine (Euroclone), 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Euroclone), 1% sodium pyruvate (Sigma) and 1% of amino-acid solution (Sigma). Cells were treated for 24 h with etoposide doses ranging from 0.07 to 225 μM, and then, in a series of experiments, were pre-treated for 1 h with various enzymatic inhibitors of different signaling pathways: 0.1 μM chelerythrine chloride (PKC, pan inhibitor), 500 nM LY290042 (PI-3-kinase/Akt inhibitor), 50 μM PD98059 (MAP kinase kinase, MEK, inhibitor), 10 μM SB203580 (p38MAPK inhibitor) or 4 μM SP600125 (JNK inhibitor).
The stock solutions of etoposide and chemical inhibitors were prepared in DMSO and pilot experiments have demonstrated that the final DMSO concentrations did not change the cell responses analyzed.
MTT assay
Cell viability was determined using the dimethylthiazolyl-2-5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT; Sigma) staining. Briefly, cells were seeded into 96-well plates (Corning Incorporated, Corning, NY, USA) and then treated with etoposide and/or inhibitors for 24 h. Next, the cells were incubated with 0.5 mg/ml MTT for 3 h at 37 °C. After incubation, the supernatant was discarded, insoluble formazan precipitates were dissolved in HCl (0.1 N in isopropanol) and the absorbance at 570 nm was recorded using a microplate reader (EL-808; BioTek Instruments Inc., Winooski, VT, USA).
Clonogenic assay
NB cells (150 per well) were seeded in six-well plates (Corning) and treated with etoposide and/or inhibitors for 24 h. Subsequently, the medium was changed and the cells were maintained in drug-free medium for 20 days. Cells were then fixed with methanol and stained with crystal violet (0.5% in water with 50% methanol). Colonies containing more than 50 cells were counted and the images were acquired with a Nikon Coolpix L22 camera (Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).
Soft-agar colony formation assay
NB cells were plated into six-well plates in the presence or absence of etoposide and/or inhibitors for 24 h. Anchorage-independent growth was carried out as follows: base agar (0.5% agar, RPMI1640 and 10% FBS) was added to each well and allowed to solidify, and then an equal volume of top agar (0.35% agar, RPMI1640 and 10% FBS), containing untreated or treated cells (103 cells per cm2), was added to each well. Plates were incubated in a 5% CO2 humidified incubator at 37 °C for 25 days. Colonies were stained with 0.005% crystal violet. Colonies containing more than 25 cells were counted by a Leica DMIRB microscope (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) and the images were acquired with a Nikon Coolpix L22 camera (Nikon).
Sphere culture of NB cells
After treatment, NB cells were cultured in DMEM-F12 knockout medium (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK) containing 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Euroclone), 2% B27 supplement (Invitrogen), 40 ng/ml bFGF (R&D Systems Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) and 20 ng/ml epidermal growth factor (EGF; Invitrogen).51 Half of the medium was then replaced with fresh culture medium every 7 days.
The self-renewal capacity of NBSs was determined by counting the spheres in the liquid culture. Growth curves were established by mechanically dissociating the passaged tumor spheres, plating 16 × 104 single cells in 25 cm2 flasks and assessing the NBSs number at every passage.
RT-PCR analysis
Total RNA was extracted using TRI𝒵𝒪ℒ reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Total RNA (1 μg) was reverse-transcribed into cDNA by random hexamer primer and SuperScript II Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen).
Amplification of cDNA by a polymerase chain reaction was performed using AmpliTaq Polymerase (Invitrogen) and specific primers for CD133, Oct4 and GAPDH. Primer sequences were: CD133 Fw – 5′-ACATCTCAACATTAATGAGC-3′ CD133 Rv – 5′-TTTGCTTCTAGATCATATGC-3′(222 bp); Oct4 Fw – 5′-CAGTGCCCGAAACCCACAC-3′ Oct4 Rv – 5′-GGAGACCCAGCAGCCTCAAA-3′ (160 bp); GAPDH Fw–5′-AGCCACATCGCTCAGACACC-3′ and GAPDH Rv – 5′-TGAGGCTGTTGTCATACTTCTC-3′ (426 bp).
Fluorescence microscopy analysis of apoptotic and necrotic cells
For the assessment of apoptosis and necrosis, cells were analyzed as described previously.25 Following treatment, cells were incubated with 0.5 μg/ml fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled recombinant Annexin-V and 0.5 μg/ml propidium iodide (PI; BioVision, Mountain View, CA, USA). Cells were then visualized and counted (four fields of 200–400 cells) by fluorescence microscopy using a Leica DMIRB microscope (Leica) with a dual filter set for FITC and rhodamine. Images were acquired with a Leica DCF320 camera. Cell death was evaluated as a percentage of Annexin-V (apoptotic) or PI-positive (necrotic) cells.
Detection of ROS production
Detection of ROS was performed as reported previously.25 After treatment, cells were incubated with 20 μM 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein-diacetate (DCFH-DA; Sigma) and the accumulation of DCF was analyzed at 530/485 nm. The cells were then observed and counted (four fields of 200–400 cells) by fluorescence microscopy using a Leica DMIRB microscope with a standard set of filters for fluorescein. The images were acquired with a Leica DCF320 camera.
DNA damage
Cells were seeded on chamber slides (Iwaky Seiyaku Co., Tokyo, Japan) treated with etoposide, fixed with paraformaldehyde (4% in PBS pH 7.5) and permeabilized with Triton 0.1%.
Nonspecific antibody binding was blocked by a 30 min incubation with 1% BSA and 1% gelatine. Cells were treated with anti-γ-H2AX antibody (1 : 500; Abcam, Cambridgeshire, UK) and then incubated with an FITC-conjugated anti-mouse antibody (Upstate, Lake Placid, NY, USA). Nuclei were identified by PI staining. Images were collected by fluorescence microscopy (Leica DMIRB microscope) with a dual filter set for FITC and rhodamine. The images were acquired with a Leica DCF320 camera.
Immunoblot analysis
Immunoblots were carried out according to standard methods25 using monoclonal mouse antibodies, anti-PKCα (Upstate, Lake Placid, NY, USA), anti-β-actin (Sigma), anti-γ-H2AX, anti-ICAM-1, anti-JNK (Abcam), anti-VEGF (Abnova, Taipei, Taiwan), and polyclonal rabbit antibodies, anti-human PKCδ, anti-Akt, anti-phospho-Akt (Thr308), anti-phospho-Akt (Ser473), anti-p38MAPK, anti-phospho-p38MAPK (Cell Signalling Technology Inc., Danvers, MA, USA), anti-phospho-JNK (Thr183) and anti-phospho-JNK (Tyr185), anti-CXCR4, anti-COX2 (Abcam), anti- MKP-1 and anti-GAPDH (Sigma).
Anti-mouse and anti-rabbit secondary antibodies were coupled with horseradish peroxidase (Amersham International, Buckinghamshire, UK). Proteins were visualized with an enzyme-linked chemiluminescence detection kit according to the manufacturer's (Amersham) instructions. Chemiluminescence was monitored by exposure to film and the signals were analyzed under non-saturating conditions with an image densitometer connected to Quantity One software (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA).
Formation of capillary-like structures
In vitro formation of capillary-like structures was carried out on untreated and treated HTLA-230 cells (2 × 104 cells per well), seeded into a 96-Matrigel-coated well plate, adding endothelial basal medium in the presence or absence of VEGF (15 ng/ml) and bFGF (50 ng/ml).11 In parallel, 10 μM sulforaphane was added as a control inhibitor of the capillary-like structure formation. Samples were analyzed over a 4–48 h period with a microscope (Leica DMIRB) using × 10 and × 20 lenses.
‘Scratch' assay
HTLA-230 cells were plated into 24-well plates and cultured until confluent. A 200 μl pipette tip was used to ‘scratch' the cell monolayers and then etoposide and/or inhibitors were added for 24 h. Photomicrographs were taken using an inverted microscope (Leica DMIRB) equipped with a × 10 lens. To evaluate the cell migration rate, images were recorded at time 0 and 24 h after the treatments. The distance between the two margins of the wound was analyzed by Adobe Photoshop 7.0.1.
Migration assay
Cell migration assay was carried out using the Transwell system (Corning) equipped with 8-μm pore size polycarbonate filters. Cells (5 × 104), suspended in serum-free medium, were plated into the upper chambers in the presence or absence of etoposide and/or inhibitors and allowed to migrate towards the lower chamber containing medium with 5% FBS, as a chemoattractant, for 24 h. Subsequently, the unmigrating cells in the upper compartment were removed using cotton swabs and the cells that had migrated to the lower surface of the filters were fixed with glutaraldehyde 2.5% (Sigma) and stained with Gill's hematoxylin no.1 solution (Sigma), following the manufacturer's instructions. The quantity of cells that had migrated through the filter was evaluated by microscopy analysis (Leica DMIRB microscope) using a × 10 lens.
Invasion assay
In vitro invasion assay was carried out in BD BioCoat Matrigel Invasion Chambers (BD) with 8 μm pores into 24-well plates, following the manufacturer's instructions. Cells (5 × 104), suspended in serum-free medium, were plated into the upper coated chambers in the presence or absence of etoposide and/or inhibitors and allowed to migrate towards the lower chamber containing medium with 5% FBS, as a chemoattractant, for 24 h. Subsequently, the unmigrated cells in the upper chamber were gently scraped off the filter. The quantity of cells that had migrated through the filter was evaluated by crystal violet staining and microscopy analysis (Leica DMIRB microscope) using a × 10 lens.
MMP activity
MMP activity in the conditioned media was determined by zymography, according to the methods described by Bernhard and Muschel.52 Cells were cultured and treated in serum-free medium. Subsequently, the conditioned medium was harvested and centrifuged at 14 000 r.p.m. × 10 min at room temperature and the resulting supernatant was concentrated by using Amicon Ultra Centrifugal Filters (Millipore Ireland Ltd, Country Cork, UK). The total protein amount was determined by the BCA method (Pierce, Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA).
Substrate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was carried out by a modified protocol of Heussen and Dowdle,53 using the gelatine Ready Gel Zymogram 10% (Bio-Rad Laboratories). Briefly, samples were mixed with Laemmli buffer (in a ratio of 3 : 1), warmed at 37 °C for 30 min and subjected to gel electrophoresis. Subsequently, the gel was incubated for 48 h in developing buffer (50 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 0.2 M NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 0.02 sodium azide and 5 mM CaCl2).
After this step, the gel was stained for 1 h (0.2% Coomassie Blue, 30% ethanol and 10% acetic acid) and then de-stained in a solution containing 10% acetic acid. The gelatine digestion was analyzed with an image densitometer connected to Quantity One software (Bio-Rad Laboratories).
Data analysis
Results were expressed as mean±S.D. from at least three independent experiments. The statistical significance of parametric differences among sets of experimental data was evaluated by one-way ANOVA and Dunnett's test for multiple comparisons.
Acknowledgments
We thank Mr Giuseppe Catalano (DIMES-University of Genoa) for his technical assistance and Ms Suzanne Patten for language editing.
Glossary
- bFGF
basic fibroblast growth factor
- COX
cyclooxygenase
- CSCs
cancer stem-like cells
- CXCR
C–X–C chemokine receptor
- EGF
epidermal growth factor
- FBS
fetal bovine serum
- FITC
fluorescein isothiocyanate
- ICAM
intercellular adhesion molecule
- JNK
c-Jun N-terminal kinase
- MAPK
mitogen-activated protein kinase
- MEK
MAP kinase kinase
- MKP-1
MAPK phosphatase-1
- MMP
matrix metalloprotease
- MTT
dimethylthiazolyl-2-5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide
- NB
neuroblastoma
- NBSs
neurospheres
- PI
propidium iodide
- PI-3 kinase
phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases
- PKC
protein kinase C
- ROS
reactive oxygen species
- SDF
stromal-derived factor
- VEGF
vascular endothelial growth factor
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Edited by G Raschellá
References
- Brodeur GM. Neuroblastoma: biological insights into a clinical enigma. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003;3:203–216. doi: 10.1038/nrc1014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maris JM, Hogarty MD, Bagatell R, Cohn SL. Neuroblastoma. Lancet. 2007;369:2106–2120. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60983-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hansford LM, McKee AE, Zhang L, George RE, Gerstle JT, Thorner PS, et al. Neuroblastoma cells isolated from bone marrow metastases contain a naturally enriched tumor-initiating cell. Cancer Res. 2007;67:11234–11243. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-0718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tonini GP, Pistoia V. Molecularly guided therapy of neuroblastoma: a review of different approaches. Curr Pharm Des. 2006;12:2303–2317. doi: 10.2174/138161206777585193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jordan CT, Guzman ML, Noble M. Cancer stem cells. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1253–1261. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra061808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hirschmann-Jax C, Foster AE, Wulf GG, Nuchtern JG, Jax TW, Gobel U, et al. A distinct ‘side population' of cells with high drug efflux capacity in human tumor cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:14228–14233. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0400067101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Geminder H, Sagi-Assif O, Goldberg L, Meshel T, Rechavi G, Witz IP, et al. A possible role for CXCR4 and its ligand, the CXC chemokine stromal cell-derived factor-1, in the development of bone marrow metastases in neuroblastoma. J Immunol. 2001;167:4747–4757. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.8.4747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gerard C, Rollins BJ. Chemokines and disease. Nat Immunol. 2001;2:108–115. doi: 10.1038/84209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burger JA, Kipps TJ. CXCR4: a key receptor in the crosstalk between tumor cells and their microenvironment. Blood. 2006;107:1761–1767. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-08-3182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Matsushima H, Bogenmann E. Modulation of neuroblastoma cell differentiation by the extracellular matrix. Int J Cancer. 1992;51:727–732. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910510511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pezzolo A, Parodi F, Marimpietri D, Raffaghello L, Cocco C, Pistorio A, et al. Oct- 4+/Tenascin C+ neuroblastoma cells serve as progenitors of tumor-derived endothelial cells. Cell Res. 2011;21:1470–1486. doi: 10.1038/cr.2011.38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Castriconi R, Dondero A, Cilli M, Ognio E, Pezzolo A, De Giovanni B, et al. Human NK cell infusions prolong survival of metastatic human neuroblastoma-bearing NOD/scid mice. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2007;56:1733–1742. doi: 10.1007/s00262-007-0317-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Karlsson J, Ora I, Porn-Ares I, Pahlman S. Arsenic trioxide-induced death of neuroblastoma cells involves activation of Bax and does not require p53. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:3179–3188. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-03-0309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Franken NA, Rodermond HM, Stap J, Haveman J, van Bree C. Clonogenic assay of cells in vitro. Nat Protoc. 2006;1:2315–2319. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen YC, Hsu HS, Chen YW, Tsai TH, How CK, Wang CY, et al. Oct-4 expression maintained cancer stem-like properties in lung cancer-derived CD133-positive cells. PLoS One. 2008;3:e2637. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hussein D, Punjaruk W, Storer LC, Shaw L, Othman R, Peet A, et al. Pediatric brain tumor cancer stem cells: cell cycle dynamics, DNA repair, and etoposide extrusion. Neuro Oncol. 2011;13:70–83. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noq144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Khalil MA, Hrabeta J, Cipro S, Stiborova M, Vicha A, Eckschlager T. Neuroblastoma stem cells – mechanisms of chemoresistance and histone deacetylase inhibitors. Neoplasma. 2012;59:37–46. doi: 10.4149/neo_2012_093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Coulon A, Flahaut M, Muhlethaler-Mottet A, Meier R, Liberman J, Balmas-Bourloud K, et al. Functional sphere profiling reveals the complexity of neuroblastoma tumor-initiating cell model. Neoplasia. 2011;13:991–1004. doi: 10.1593/neo.11800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sartelet H, Imbriglio T, Nyalendo C, Haddad E, Annabi B, Duval M, et al. CD133 expression is associated with poor outcome in neuroblastoma via chemoresistance mediated by the AKT pathway. Histopathology. 2012;60:1144–1155. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2012.04191.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oh SY, Sohn YW, Park JW, Park HJ, Jeon HM, Kim TK, et al. Selective cell death of oncogenic Akt-transduced brain cancer cells by etoposide through reactive oxygen species mediated damage. Mol Cancer Ther. 2007;6:2178–2187. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-07-0111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marengo B, De Ciucis C, Ricciarelli R, Passalacqua M, Nitti M, Zingg JM, et al. PKCdelta sensitizes neuroblastoma cells to ℒ-buthionine-sulfoximine and etoposide inducing reactive oxygen species overproduction and DNA damage. PLoS One. 2011;6:e14661. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gopalakrishna R, Jaken S. Protein kinase C signaling and oxidative stress. Free Radic Biol Med. 2000;28:1349–1361. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5849(00)00221-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Basu A, Woolard MD, Johnson CL. Involvement of protein kinase C-delta in DNA damage-induced apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2001;8:899–908. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4400885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jiang XH, Tu SP, Cui JT, Lin MC, Xia HH, Wong WM, et al. Antisense targeting protein kinase C alpha and beta1 inhibits gastric carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 2004;64:5787–5794. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-1172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Domenicotti C, Marengo B, Verzola D, Garibotto G, Traverso N, Patriarca S, et al. Role of PKC-delta activity in glutathione-depleted neuroblastoma cells. Free Radic Biol Med. 2003;35:504–516. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5849(03)00332-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marengo B, De Ciucis C, Verzola D, Pistoia V, Raffaghello L, Patriarca S, et al. Mechanisms of BSO (ℒ-buthionine-S,R-sulfoximine)-induced cytotoxic effects in neuroblastoma. Free Radic Biol Med. 2008;44:474–482. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2007.10.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mebratu Y, Tesfaigzi Y. How ERK1/2 activation controls cell proliferation and cell death: Is subcellular localization the answer. Cell Cycle. 2009;8:1168–1175. doi: 10.4161/cc.8.8.8147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McCubrey JA, Steelman LS, Abrams SL, Bertrand FE, Ludwig DE, Basecke J, et al. Targeting survival cascades induced by activation of Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK, PI3K/PTEN/Akt/mTOR and Jak/STAT pathways for effective leukemia therapy. Leukemia. 2008;22:708–722. doi: 10.1038/leu.2008.27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sato T, Yamochi T, Yamochi T, Aytac U, Ohnuma K, McKee KS, et al. CD26 regulates p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase-dependent phosphorylation of integrin beta1, adhesion to extracellular matrix, and tumorigenicity of T-anaplastic large cell lymphoma Karpas 299. Cancer Res. 2005;65:6950–6956. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Amran D, Sancho P, Fernandez C, Esteban D, Ramos AM, de Blas E, et al. Pharmacological inhibitors of extracellular signal-regulated protein kinases attenuate the apoptotic action of cisplatin in human myeloid leukemia cells via glutathione-independent reduction in intracellular drug accumulation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005;1743:269–279. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2004.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Owens DM, Keyse SM. Differential regulation of MAP kinase signalling by dual-specificity protein phosphatases. Oncogene. 2007;26:3203–3213. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saxe JP, Tomilin A, Scholer HR, Plath K, Huang J. Post-translational regulation of Oct4 transcriptional activity. PLoS One. 2009;4:e4467. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gidekel S, Pizov G, Bergman Y, Pikarsky E. Oct-3/4 is a dose-dependent oncogenic fate determinant. Cancer Cell. 2003;4:361–370. doi: 10.1016/s1535-6108(03)00270-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pages G, Berra E, Milanini J, Levy AP, Pouyssegur J. Stress-activated protein kinases (JNK and p38/HOG) are essential for vascular endothelial growth factor mRNA stability. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:26484–26491. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M002104200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McMullen ME, Bryant PW, Glembotski CC, Vincent PA, Pumiglia KM. Activation of p38 has opposing effects on the proliferation and migration of endothelial cells. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:20995–21003. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M407060200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pezzolo A, Parodi F, Corrias MV, Cinti R, Gambini C, Pistoia V. Tumor origin of endothelial cells in human neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:376–383. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.0696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Paulis YW, Soetekouw PM, Verheul HM, Tjan-Heijnen VC, Griffioen AW. Signalling pathways in vasculogenic mimicry. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010;1806:18–28. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2010.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jang BC, Sanchez T, Schaefers HJ, Trifan OC, Liu CH, Creminon C, et al. Serum withdrawal-induced post-transcriptional stabilization of cyclooxygenase-2 mRNA in MDA-MB-231 mammary carcinoma cells requires the activity of the p38 stress-activated protein kinase. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:39507–39515. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M003224200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kumar B, Koul S, Petersen J, Khandrika L, Hwa JS, Meacham RB, et al. p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase-driven MAPKAPK2 regulates invasion of bladder cancer by modulation of MMP-2 and MMP-9 activity. Cancer Res. 2010;70:832–841. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-2918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hsieh YH, Wu TT, Huang CY, Hsieh YS, Hwang JM, Liu JY. p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway is involved in protein kinase Calpha-regulated invasion in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Cancer Res. 2007;67:4320–4327. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-2486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Raffaghello L, Cocco C, Corrias MV, Airoldi I, Pistoia V. Chemokines in neuroectodermal tumour progression and metastasis. Semin Cancer Biol. 2009;19:97–102. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2008.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hiratsuka S, Duda DG, Huang Y, Goel S, Sugiyama T, Nagasawa T, et al. C-X-C receptor type 4 promotes metastasis by activating p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase in myeloid differentiation antigen (Gr-1)-positive cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:302–307. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1016917108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hwang D, Jang BC, Yu G, Boudreau M. Expression of mitogen-inducible cyclooxygenase induced by lipopolysaccharide: mediation through both mitogen-activated protein kinase and NF -kappaB signaling pathways in macrophages. Biochem Pharmacol. 1997;54:87–96. doi: 10.1016/s0006-2952(97)00154-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tsujii M, Kawano S, DuBois RN. Cyclooxygenase-2 expression in human colon cancer cells increases metastatic potential. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:3336–3340. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.7.3336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fulton AM, Ma X, Kundu N. Targeting prostaglandin E EP receptors to inhibit metastasis. Cancer Res. 2006;66:9794–9797. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-2067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zimmerman T, Blanco FJ. Inhibitors targeting the LFA-1/ICAM-1 cell-adhesion interaction: design and mechanism of action. Curr Pharm Des. 2008;14:2128–2139. doi: 10.2174/138161208785740225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Khan Z, Khan N, Tiwari RP, Sah NK, Prasad GB, Bisen PS. Biology of Cox-2: an application in cancer therapeutics. Curr Drug Targets. 2011;12:1082–1093. doi: 10.2174/138945011795677764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Badger AM, Bradbeer JN, Votta B, Lee JC, Adams JL, Griswold DE. Pharmacological profile of SB 203580, a selective inhibitor of cytokine suppressive binding protein/p38 kinase, in animal models of arthritis, bone resorption, endotoxin shock and immune function. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1996;279:1453–1461. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee MR, Dominguez C. MAP kinase p38 inhibitors: clinical results and an intimate look at their interactions with p38alpha protein. Curr Med Chem. 2005;12:2979–2994. doi: 10.2174/092986705774462914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gross N, Meier R. Chemokines in neuroectodermal cancers: the crucial growth signal from the soil. Semin Cancer Biol. 2009;19:103–110. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2008.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Toma JG, McKenzie IA, Bagli D, Miller FD. Isolation and characterization of multipotent skin-derived precursors from human skin. Stem Cells. 2005;23:727–737. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2004-0134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bernhard EJ, RJ Muschel. Ras metastasis, and matrix metalloproteinase 9. Methods Enzymol. 2001;333:96–104. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(01)33048-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heussen C, Dowdle EB. Electrophoretic analysis of plasminogen activators in polyacrylamide gels containing sodium dodecyl sulfate and copolymerized substrates. Anal Biochem. 1980;102:196–202. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(80)90338-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]