Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 1992 May;12(5):2424–2431. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.5.2424

A group of scs elements function as domain boundaries in an enhancer-blocking assay.

R Kellum 1, P Schedl 1
PMCID: PMC364415  PMID: 1569958

Abstract

Chromosomes of higher eukaryotes are thought to be organized into a series of discrete and topologically independent higher-order domains. In addition to providing a mechanism for chromatin compaction, these higher-order domains are thought to define independent units of gene activity. Implicit in most models for the folding of the chromatin fiber are special nucleoprotein structures, the domain boundaries, which serve to delimit each higher-order chromosomal domain. We have used an "enhancer-blocking assay" to test putative domain boundaries for boundary function in vivo. This assay is based on the notion that in delimiting independent units of gene activity, domain boundaries should be able to restrict the scope of activity of enhancer elements to genes which reside within the same domain. In this case, interposing a boundary between an enhancer and a promoter should block the action of the enhancer. In the experiments reported here, we have used the yolk protein-1 enhancer element and an hsp70 promoter:lacZ fusion gene to test putative boundary DNA segments for enhancer-blocking activity. We have found that several scs-like elements are capable of blocking the action of the yp-1 enhancer when placed between it and the hsp70 promoter. In contrast, a MAR/SAR DNA segment and another spacer DNA segment had no apparent effect on enhancer activity.

Full text

PDF
2424

Images in this article

2427Image
on p.2427
2428Image
on p.2428

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Atchison M. L. Enhancers: mechanisms of action and cell specificity. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1988;4:127–153. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.04.110188.001015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bellen H. J., O'Kane C. J., Wilson C., Grossniklaus U., Pearson R. K., Gehring W. J. P-element-mediated enhancer detection: a versatile method to study development in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 1989 Sep;3(9):1288–1300. doi: 10.1101/gad.3.9.1288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bier E., Vaessin H., Shepherd S., Lee K., McCall K., Barbel S., Ackerman L., Carretto R., Uemura T., Grell E. Searching for pattern and mutation in the Drosophila genome with a P-lacZ vector. Genes Dev. 1989 Sep;3(9):1273–1287. doi: 10.1101/gad.3.9.1273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Boulet A. M., Scott M. P. Control elements of the P2 promoter of the Antennapedia gene. Genes Dev. 1988 Dec;2(12A):1600–1614. doi: 10.1101/gad.2.12a.1600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cockerill P. N., Garrard W. T. Chromosomal loop anchorage of the kappa immunoglobulin gene occurs next to the enhancer in a region containing topoisomerase II sites. Cell. 1986 Jan 31;44(2):273–282. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90761-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. DeLotto R., Schedl P. A Drosophila melanogaster transfer RNA gene cluster at the cytogenetic locus 90BC. J Mol Biol. 1984 Nov 15;179(4):587–605. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90157-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Garabedian M. J., Hung M. C., Wensink P. C. Independent control elements that determine yolk protein gene expression in alternative Drosophila tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Mar;82(5):1396–1400. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.5.1396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Garabedian M. J., Shepherd B. M., Wensink P. C. A tissue-specific transcription enhancer from the Drosophila yolk protein 1 gene. Cell. 1986 Jun 20;45(6):859–867. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90560-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gasser S. M., Laemmli U. K. The organisation of chromatin loops: characterization of a scaffold attachment site. EMBO J. 1986 Mar;5(3):511–518. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04240.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Guarente L., Hoar E. Upstream activation sites of the CYC1 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae are active when inverted but not when placed downstream of the "TATA box". Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Dec;81(24):7860–7864. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.24.7860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hiromi Y., Gehring W. J. Regulation and function of the Drosophila segmentation gene fushi tarazu. Cell. 1987 Sep 11;50(6):963–974. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90523-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Irvine K. D., Helfand S. L., Hogness D. S. The large upstream control region of the Drosophila homeotic gene Ultrabithorax. Development. 1991 Feb;111(2):407–424. doi: 10.1242/dev.111.2.407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kadesch T., Berg P. Effects of the position of the simian virus 40 enhancer on expression of multiple transcription units in a single plasmid. Mol Cell Biol. 1986 Jul;6(7):2593–2601. doi: 10.1128/mcb.6.7.2593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Karch F., Weiffenbach B., Peifer M., Bender W., Duncan I., Celniker S., Crosby M., Lewis E. B. The abdominal region of the bithorax complex. Cell. 1985 Nov;43(1):81–96. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90014-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kellum R., Schedl P. A position-effect assay for boundaries of higher order chromosomal domains. Cell. 1991 Mar 8;64(5):941–950. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90318-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Logan S. K., Garabedian M. J., Wensink P. C. DNA regions that regulate the ovarian transcriptional specificity of Drosophila yolk protein genes. Genes Dev. 1989 Sep;3(9):1453–1461. doi: 10.1101/gad.3.9.1453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lyon M. F. The quest for the X-inactivation centre. Trends Genet. 1991 Mar;7(3):69–70. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(91)90271-Q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Masucci J. D., Miltenberger R. J., Hoffmann F. M. Pattern-specific expression of the Drosophila decapentaplegic gene in imaginal disks is regulated by 3' cis-regulatory elements. Genes Dev. 1990 Nov;4(11):2011–2023. doi: 10.1101/gad.4.11.2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mirkovitch J., Mirault M. E., Laemmli U. K. Organization of the higher-order chromatin loop: specific DNA attachment sites on nuclear scaffold. Cell. 1984 Nov;39(1):223–232. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90208-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. O'Kane C. J., Gehring W. J. Detection in situ of genomic regulatory elements in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Dec;84(24):9123–9127. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.24.9123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Salz H. K., Maine E. M., Keyes L. N., Samuels M. E., Cline T. W., Schedl P. The Drosophila female-specific sex-determination gene, Sex-lethal, has stage-, tissue-, and sex-specific RNAs suggesting multiple modes of regulation. Genes Dev. 1989 May;3(5):708–719. doi: 10.1101/gad.3.5.708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Simon J. A., Sutton C. A., Lobell R. B., Glaser R. L., Lis J. T. Determinants of heat shock-induced chromosome puffing. Cell. 1985 Apr;40(4):805–817. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90340-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. St Johnston R. D., Hoffmann F. M., Blackman R. K., Segal D., Grimaila R., Padgett R. W., Irick H. A., Gelbart W. M. Molecular organization of the decapentaplegic gene in Drosophila melanogaster. Genes Dev. 1990 Jul;4(7):1114–1127. doi: 10.1101/gad.4.7.1114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Stief A., Winter D. M., Strätling W. H., Sippel A. E. A nuclear DNA attachment element mediates elevated and position-independent gene activity. Nature. 1989 Sep 28;341(6240):343–345. doi: 10.1038/341343a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Strätling W. H., Dölle A., Sippel A. E. Chromatin structure of the chicken lysozyme gene domain as determined by chromatin fractionation and micrococcal nuclease digestion. Biochemistry. 1986 Jan 28;25(2):495–502. doi: 10.1021/bi00350a033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Udvardy A., Maine E., Schedl P. The 87A7 chromomere. Identification of novel chromatin structures flanking the heat shock locus that may define the boundaries of higher order domains. J Mol Biol. 1985 Sep 20;185(2):341–358. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(85)90408-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Udvardy A., Schedl P. Chromatin structure, not DNA sequence specificity, is the primary determinant of topoisomerase II sites of action in vivo. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Oct;11(10):4973–4984. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.10.4973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wilson C., Bellen H. J., Gehring W. J. Position effects on eukaryotic gene expression. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1990;6:679–714. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.06.110190.003335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. de Villiers J., Olson L., Banerji J., Schaffner W. Analysis of the transcriptional enhancer effect. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1983;47(Pt 2):911–919. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1983.047.01.105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES