Abstract
Riboswitches are RNA sensors that change conformation upon binding small molecule metabolites, in turn modulating gene expression. Our understanding of riboswitch regulatory function would be accelerated by a high throughput, quantitative screening tool capable of measuring riboswitch-ligand binding. We introduce a microfluidic mobility shift assay that enables precise and rapid quantitation of ligand binding and subsequent riboswitch conformational change. In 0.3% of the time required for bench top assays (3.2 min vs. 1020 min), we screen and validate five candidate SAM-I riboswitches isolated from thermophilic and cryophilic bacteria. The format offers enhanced resolution of conformational change compared to slab gel formats, quantitation and repeatability for statistical assessment of small mobility shifts, low reagent consumption, and riboswitch characterization without modification of the aptamer structure. Appreciable analytical sensitivity coupled with high resolution separation performance allows quantitation of equilibrium dissociation constants (Kd) for both rapidly and slowly interconverting riboswitch-ligand pairs as validated through experiments and modeling. Conformational change, triplicate mobility shift measurements, and Kd are reported for both a known and a candidate SAM-I riboswitch with comparison to in-line probing assay results. The microfluidic mobility shift assay establishes a scalable format for the study of riboswitch-ligand binding that will advance the discovery and selection of novel riboswitches and the development of antibiotics to target bacterial riboswitches.
Keywords: Riboswitch, Microfluidic, Mobility Shift, Lab-on-a-chip, Screening
Introduction
Molecular conformation is fundamental to gene expression. In particular, localized RNA conformational changes upon ligand binding are critical to riboswitch-mediated gene control. Riboswitches are cis-acting RNA elements composed of both an aptamer and expression platform domain. These RNA molecules undergo a conformational change when bound to small molecule metabolites or ligands.1,2 Conformation changes confer gene regulation mainly by terminating transcription (e.g., through formation of a terminator hairpin) or inhibiting translation initiation (e.g., through sequestration of the Shine-Dalgarno sequence).2 First discovered just a decade ago,3 only a handful of riboswitches have been identified, warranting further discovery and characterization efforts. Understanding these conserved gene regulatory mechanisms may profoundly impact diverse efforts including developing next-generation antibiotics,4 designing genetic circuitry for synthetic biology applications,5 and generating RNA-based biosensors.6
Given the importance of these molecules and the computational power of current bioinformatics tools, the number of in silico predicted riboswitches has surged.7,8 Subsequent experimental validation of putative riboswitches relies on bench-top assays that determine ligand binding through various means, including observation of RNA conformational change via techniques such as in-line probing,9 2-aminopurine fluorescence,10,11 and Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET);12 change in heat of the reaction via isothermal calorimetry; 13 or ligand diffusion via equilibrium dialysis.14 While suitable for low-throughput biophysical measurements, these conventional riboswitch analytical tools have notable limitations, such as requiring lengthy incubation times, large sample sizes, or site-specific labeling of the ligand or the RNA, all of which slow down analytical throughput.
A binding assay that obviates the need for site-specific labeling of the ligand or the RNA is native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE). Native PAGE is extensively employed to study protein-protein,15 protein-nucleotide,16 and nucleotide-small molecule10 interactions. Slab gel native PAGE has been used to confirm protein-free riboswitch-metabolite binding and altered RNA conformation through an observed change in riboswitch aptamer electrophoretic mobility (‘mobility shift’).17,18 The mobility shift typically stems from the more compact structure of the ligand-bound riboswitch aptamer as compared to unbound RNA. Thus, the compact bound riboswitch exhibits a faster apparent electrophoretic mobility than the unbound RNA (Figure 1A).
However, the workhorse native PAGE slab gel assay is unsuitable for high throughput screens needed to experimentally validate candidate riboswitches and explore promising regions of the prediction space. Further, native PAGE slab gels often lack the resolving power required to separate molecular populations with small mobility shifts or those that differ in conformation rather than weight. Perhaps most important to riboswitch functional validation, slab gel native PAGE lacks the quantitation capacity essential to generate a robust, detailed understanding of riboswitch function and binding affinity. In contrast, microfluidic electrophoretic assays offer run-to-run repeatability and a degree of precision not attainable with slab gel formats. While microfluidic integration and automation has begun to benefit drug screening,19 developmental biology,20,21 and cell sorting for cancer research,22 neither the throughput nor precision of on-chip PAGE have been harnessed for quantitative characterization of riboswitch-ligand binding interactions.
Consequently, we introduce an efficient riboswitch microfluidic mobility shift assay (μMSA) which advances beyond slab gel mobility shift assays by reporting ligand binding and riboswitch conformational change quickly (3 min) and quantitatively (Figure 1). Coupled with high sensitivity fluorescence-based detection, we show that the microfluidic assay allows enhanced resolution of conformational change and enables riboswitch discovery and characterization without modification of the riboswitch aptamer structure. The enhanced analytical performance is also shown to enable quantification of equilibrium binding constants (Kd) spanning slowly to rapidly interconverting riboswitch-ligand pair targets. Lastly, we apply the riboswitch screening platform to functional analysis of five computationally predicted, but previously unvalidated SAM-I riboswitches – completing the screening process with unmatched precision, reproducibility, and sparing resource consumption.
Results & Discussion
Microfluidic Mobility Shift Assay Design: Screening Rapidly and Slowly Interconverting Binding Pairs
To introduce a broadly relevant riboswitch screening tool, we sought to design a native PAGE mobility shift assay capable of: (i) high-precision peak shift measurements appropriate for assessment of the small anticipated mobility shifts associated with RNA conformation change, (ii) repeatable operation to allow tests of statistical significance for observed mobility shifts, (iii) resource-sparing operation (material, time, handling) to afford assay scalability for screening uses, and (iv) quantifying Kd for a broad range of riboswitch-ligand binding kinetics. Here we detail salient design considerations for μMSA noting that while we focus attention on Kd determination for the ligand S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) binding to a set of fluorescently labeled known or putative SAM-I riboswitch aptamers, the assay platform is conversely well-suited to screening of a single putative riboswitch against a library of ligands.
We first sought to introduce a riboswitch functional screening assay optimized for measurement of Kd. For Kd determination, the RNA concentration typically must be significantly less than the expected Kd value,23 making analytical sensitivity an important design specification for this screening assay. To meet this specification, we combine sensitive laser induced fluorescence (LIF) detection with fast microfluidic PAGE separations. High electric field PAGE, realizable due to excellent heat dissipation on the micro scale, yields fast separations which reduce the time for band broadening arising from molecular diffusion. To quantify the overlap of two peaks of interest, Δa is the distance between the peaks, and σ1 and σ2 are the bound and unbound peak widths, respectively). When Rs > 0.5, the peaks are considered resolved.24 Combined with LIF, the rapid assay yields high signal to noise ratios (> 3) even for picomolar RNA concentrations. Under these conditions, a single assay run completes in 12 s compared to 17 hours on a slab gel format, translating to detection of 40× smaller mobility shifts as compared to slab gels (Figure S1).
Next we sought to design electrophoretic separations capable of probing riboswitch-ligand binding interactions spanning rapidly to slowly interconverting systems (i.e., interconversion between bound and unbound forms). The speed of interconversion is important, as the Damkohler (Da) number indicates whether one or two peaks are expected. Thus, in turn, the Da number informs method selection for Kd determination using electrophoresis. Following convention, we define two Damkohler numbers for electrophoretic separations of bound and unbound riboswitch populations as: Daon = konLcL/EμA and Daoff = koffL/EμA, where kon and koff are the association and dissociation rate constants, respectively, L is the length scale of separation, E is the electric field, cL is the concentration of ligand, and μA is the mobility of unbound riboswitch. The Peclet number (Pe = LμE/D) is ~500 for all μMSA simulations and data and ~800 for all slab gel data. Since Kd is a ratio of the rates of dissociation and association, binding pairs with similar Kd values can be either fast or slow interconverting species (Figures 1B, C, and S2). We consider both cases.
In the case of slow interconversion (e.g., Daon > 1 and Daoff < 1), two peaks corresponding to distinct bound and unbound RNA populations are resolvable (Rs > 0.5) by native PAGE (Figures 1C and S3). When the fluorescently-labeled RNA is in excess, two populations are resolvable, since riboswitch-ligand association is rapid while dissociation is slow in this regime – meaning that bound species stay bound throughout the characteristic electrophoresis time.25,26 Thus, in the slow interconversion regime Kd is determined by measuring the peak height for the bound population of conformers as ligand concentration is increased. This method has been previously utilized to measure antibody-antigen Kd on-chip via native PAGE.27
In the rapid interconversion regime (Daon, Daoff > 1), bound and unbound populations are predicted to overlap (Rs < 0.5), yielding a single riboswitch peak via native PAGE analysis (Figures 1B and S3). The riboswitch population forms a single peak as the association and dissociation times for the riboswitch-ligand interaction are fast compared to the timescale of electrophoresis. Thus, the mobility of this single peak corresponds to the population-average of bound riboswitches. 25,26 In this regime, Kd is determined by tracking the electrophoretic mobility of the single riboswitch band as ligand concentration is increased. In both regimes, free ligand will move with a fast electrophoretic mobility, owing to its small size, but the observed interconversion regimes will occur independent of ligand mobility. In this system, free ligand, free RNA, and bound RNA were not assumed to have the same electrophoretic mobility.
With these transport and reaction considerations in mind, we describe development of μMSA for Kd determination of a rapidly interconverting riboswitch-ligand binding pair (a validated SAM-I riboswitch from Bacillus subtilis), then of a slowly interconverting pair (a putative SAM-I riboswitch from Polaribacter irgensii). We then apply the new tool to functional screening of putative, computationally predicted SAM-I riboswitches.
Quantitative Analysis of Rapidly Interconverting Riboswitch States: A Validated SAM-I Riboswitch from Bacillus subtilis
We first studied the mobility shift of and assessed the Kd for a previously confirmed 124 yitJ SAM-I riboswitch aptamer isolated from B. subtilis (Bs, Figure 2) that rapidly interconverts between bound and free states.28 The mobility shift of the single peak was measured for increasing concentrations of SAM ligand with both μMSA and slab gel mobility shift formats. At a ligand:riboswitch ratio of 0.69, μMSA detected a single peak with a mobility 30% of the maximum mobility when binding is saturated (Figure 2A). At the same ligand: riboswitch ratio, the slab gel reported a single Bs SAM-I riboswitch band with maximally shifted mobility (Figure 2B). Consistent with our model for rapidly interconverting binding pairs, a single band was observed in both formats. In this regime the band mobility represents the fraction of bound RNA to total RNA.26 The bound RNA population increases as ligand concentration increases, thus increasing the measured peak mobility until all the RNA molecules are bound and the peak is fully shifted. Unlike the slab gel, μMSA’s ability to resolve intermediate peak mobilities suggests the microfluidic assay is capable of determining riboswitch-ligand equilibrium dissociation constant (Kd). This lack of resolving power on a slab gel format also was observed for native PAGE analysis of the SAM-II riboswitch at intermediate ligand concentrations.17
In addition to needing to resolve intermediate mobility shifts as ligand concentration is increased, the binding assays are performed at RNA concentrations less than the Kd value and lower than the ligand concentrations in order to simplify the assessment of Kd. The μMSA lower limit of detection (LLOD) was 870 pM of RNA in 1 μL of sample detected using laser-induced-fluorescence (signal to noise ratio = 5.3, labeling efficiency of 0.45 AlexaFluor-633 dye molecules per RNA molecule, detection at 1 mm separation distance, 3–12%T PA gel). This translates to 391.5 attomol of fluorescently-labeled RNA. Using a laser-induced-fluorescence scanner, we determined the LLOD for the slab gel format to be approximately 0.75 pmol for fluorescently labeled RNA (labeling efficiency of 0.75 fluorophore dye molecules per RNA molecule). Typical slab gel LLOD is 4.8 femtomol of radiolabeled RNA.29 The μMSA platform thus yields a 1916-fold sensitivity improvement over a slab gel format for fluorescently labeled RNA and comparable sensitivity to radiolabeled RNA, which is commonly employed for in-line probing assays. Importantly, μMSA can be used to rapidly measure Kd values as low as 1 nM using fluorescence detection and does not require modification of the riboswitch aptamer structure or the ligand, unlike 2AP fluorescence or FRET experiments.10–12
We next determined Kd for the Bs SAM-I riboswitch using μMSA and compared our results against those from a conventional in-line probing assay. To determine Kd, RNA peak mobility was measured at different SAM ligand concentrations and the resulting dose response curve was fit with a 3 parameter logistic model (Figure 3). μMSA-determined Kd values were 25.226 ± 0.004 nM in tris-borate (TB) buffer with 1 mM Mg2+ (TBM1 buffer) (n = 4) and 3.14123 ± 0.00005 nM in TB buffer with 10 mM Mg2+ (TBM10 buffer) (n = 4). Both μMSA values agree well with results from the in-line probing assays performed using identical buffer conditions: 25 nM Kd and 3 nM Kd, respectively (Figures 3 and S4). The observed improvement in ligand binding affinity at 10 mM Mg2+ is consistent with biophysical studies that have shown Mg2+ facilitates folding of the SAM-I and other riboswitches.17,30,31
To further probe the effect of Mg2+ and K+ concentration on the RNA mobility shift, we screened varying buffer compositions using μMSA. SAM-I Bs riboswitch mobility and the percentage mobility change with saturating amounts of SAM ligand present were measured (Figure 4). A statistically significant ligand-induced shift was observed for all buffer conditions (p < 0.05 using two tailed t-test). The relative mobility of the riboswitch did not change according to a consistent trend with increasing Mg2+, either in the presence or absence of monovalent ions. Most likely this is due to the fact that changing ion concentrations affects the interaction of the RNA with electrolyte (run buffer) in the gel matrix25 as well as potentially the RNA fold. However, the extent of mobility shift upon ligand binding (as measured by relative mobility change) did not appear to be significantly different in the regime of Mg2+ concentrations tested. This result is consistent with findings that the SAM-I Bs riboswitch assumes an unfolded state in the absence of magnesium, but the magnesium-induced fold is saturated by 1 mM Mg2+.32 Interestingly, the presence of K+ generally increased the relative mobility change. Unlike the lysine riboswitch, which specifically requires a K+ ion to chelate the carboxylate group of the amino acid ligand,33 the SAM-I riboswitch is not known to bind any specific K+ ions. Thus, the observed effect instead may be attributed to changing the composition of divalent and monovalent ions interacting with the RNA.
As is important for screening, the total time to results using μMSA was notably shorter than the 17 hr required for slab gel analysis (Figure S1). Analysis by μMSA required 3.2 min including sample loading and triplicate runs for both samples in order to assess the statistical significance of observed shifts. Thus, the time savings achieved with μMSA translates to a 316-fold reduction – critical for high throughput experimental validation of computationally predicted riboswitch-ligand interactions. As are common yet important advantages of microfluidic design, μMSA requires reduced reagent (attomol compared to pmol) and buffer volumes (μL compared to L). Further, μMSA is performed at room temperature, whereas cooling to less than or equal to 10 °C is often required to limit diffusion and prevent RNA degradation in long-duration slab gel PAGE.25 In a practical but important point, the μMSA screening platform allows repeat use of a single PAGE channel for multiple assays that, with proper intermediate wash steps and controls, limit platform preparation time and effort while enabling excellent run-to-run reproducibility. Assay repeatability was evaluated by performing 53 sequential injections of phosphorylase B (PB) over a 2–3 hour period. The average time for the peak to migrate 1 mm from the injection junction was 9.6 ± 0.2 sec, representing a 2.3% variation. The average peak height over 46 sequential injections was 1.80 ± 0.28 fluorescence units, representing a 15% variation. μMSA gels were used for an average of 62 runs over a 7 month period of experimentation. This high repeatability is expected owing to the low nonspecific adsorption and durability of the polyacrylamide gels.
Quantitative Analysis of Slowly Interconverting Riboswitch States: A Putative SAM-I Riboswitch from Polaribacter irgensii
We next studied the mobility shift and assessed the Kd for a riboswitch that slowly interconverts between bound and free states. Here a putative SAM-I riboswitch isolated from Polaribacter irgensii (Pi) was analyzed via μMSA for ligand binding with increasing concentrations of SAM ligand. Both the μMSA and slab gel mobility shift assays reported two Pi riboswitch peaks for ligand:riboswitch ratios of less than 1 (Figure 5A,B). In these cases, the riboswitch is present in excess over ligand and the bound and unbound populations are resolved as separate peaks (measured on-chip Rs = 0.66), demonstrating that negligible interconversion is occurring during the timescales of both the μMSA and slab gel separations. The μMSA required a 12 s separation step while the slab gel format required appreciably longer (a 20 hour separation step). The short μMSA analysis times mitigate diffusive band broadening found in long-duration slab gel native PAGE.25 μMSA reports sharp peaks even under native PAGE conditions. Quantifying the amount of material in each conformational state should thus benefit from native PAGE in microfluidic formats.
In this system, the ligand-bound riboswitch population increases with ligand concentration until all RNA molecules are in the bound state, as predicted (Figure 1). We used the μMSA to generate a dose-response curve then fit that experimental data with a 3-parameter logistic model to yield Kd (Figure 5C). The notable difference between our analysis here and that of the fast interconversion regime is that we now measure the peak height for the higher mobility peak (ligand-bound population) across increasing ligand concentrations and not the mobility shift of a single peak as in the rapid interconversion regime. With this approach, the Kd of Pi was measured as 1.0 ± 0.2 nM using μMSA (n = 4) which is on the order of the 3 nM value measured using a conventional inline probing assay (Figure 5D and Figure S5). Deviation between the two methods may arise from optimization demands on the peak fitting algorithm and/or RNA concentration inaccuracies.
As is critical to an efficient mobility shift screening platform, measurement of riboswitch-ligand Kd for one riboswitch-ligand pair required 1.87 hours for μMSA versus 44+ hours using the in-line probing assay. Use of μMSA resulted in (at a minimum) a 24-fold reduction in the time-to-results. The total time to results for the microfluidic format includes a one hour sample incubation to equilibrate the binding reaction and 52 minutes to run 12 samples on-chip in quadruplicate. Meanwhile the in-line probing method requires a 40 hour sample incubation to perform the in-line cleavage reaction after ligand binding has equilibrated, followed by a 2–4 hour denaturing PAGE slab gel run, an additional two hours to dry the gel, and several hours to overnight to image the gel using a phosphorimager cassette.
Microfluidic Screening for Candidate Riboswitch Validation
Efficient screening of computationally predicted riboswitches for functionality is critical for increasing the number of known riboswitch-ligand pairs. To this end, we assayed five computationally predicted but previously unvalidated SAM-I riboswitches using μMSA in the presence and absence of SAM ligand (Figure 6). The computationally predicted putative SAM-I riboswitches were selected for their varying properties (e.g., GC content, length) and were isolated from Rubrobacter xylanophilus (Rx), Acidothermus cellulolyticus (Ac), Carboxydothermus hydrogenoformans (Ch), Polaribacter irgensii (Pi, discussed above), and Polaribacter sp. (Ps). Selection criteria are provided in SI Text.
A statistically significant mobility shift was measured for all five putative SAM-I riboswitches from Rx, Ac, Ch, Pi, and Ps using μMSA (p < 0.05 using two tailed t-test, indicated with a ‘*’ in Figure 6B). The slab gel format detected a mobility shift for four of the five putative SAM-I riboswitches. No mobility shift was observed for the GC-rich SAM-I riboswitch from Rx (indicated with ‘NS’ in Figure 6A). The statistical significance of an observed shift could not be calculated with the slab gel format owing to the high variability and long assay run times. The well-studied SAM-I riboswitch from Bacillus subtilis (Bs) was included as a positive control and demonstrated a mobility shift on both formats, as expected. M1 and P2 are previously characterized mutants of the Bs SAM-I riboswitch18,28 (also characterized in Figure S1) that do not bind SAM ligand and were included as negative controls for on-chip experiments. The related M1N and P2N mutants, which contain some additional flanking sequences, were used as separate negative controls for slab gel experiments. Each demonstrated no statistically significant mobility shift in equally powered experiments. These results suggest that μMSA enables detection of a mobility shift for smaller conformational changes, including challenging riboswitch aptamer structures with high GC content (up to 75% GC demonstrated here with Rx) and long chain lengths which result in a smaller shift relative to the total size of the molecule (up to 162 nt considered here with Ac). Mobility shift detection can be improved on a slab gel format by increasing well size, but, importantly, sample throughput is sacrificed (Figure S6).
The total time to screen the five candidate riboswitches, one positive control, and two negative controls via μMSA was 58 min. The time savings and repeatability attained with μMSA enabled replicates thus allowing determination of statistical significance for an observed shift, an endeavor that is not typically performed with conventional slab gels.
Conclusions
Taken together, the μMSA microfluidic screening tool introduced here opens the possibility of facile library screens for selection and validation of novel riboswitches. The demonstrated rapid assay times and precise quantitative capabilities enable the mobility resolution required to measure Kd for both slowly and rapidly interconverting riboswitch-ligand pairs. Owing to the analytical improvements of μMSA over slab gel formats and the prevalent usage of slab gel mobility shift assays in riboswitch research, on-going work in our laboratories focuses on utilizing μMSA to study other riboswitches beyond SAM-I. The μMSA format has wide-ranging analytical potential, such as: facilitating the identification of natural metabolite targets for orphan riboswitch classes for which no ligand has been discovered to date,34 enabling the screening of conditions (e.g., buffer composition, ligand libraries) for riboswitch-ligand binding and selection experiments, allowing efficient characterization of the binding affinity and kinetics of newly discovered riboswitch-ligand pairs, and providing insight into the concentrations of ligand needed in the cell to induce genetic regulation for thermodynamically controlled riboswitches. Microfluidic assay design may also advance the identification of new riboswitch-ligand pairs with broad applications in antibiotic development,4 new genetic regulation control,5 and for use as biosensors for metabolite sensing in vivo.6
Experimental Procedures
Reagents and Oligonucleotides
RNAs were transcribed in vitro using standard protocols35 from DNA templates containing the extended T7 promoter sequence generated by PCR. Fluorophore dyes (fluorescein, AlexaFluor 488, or AlexaFluor 633) were conjugated to the RNAs following standard procedures for 3′ end labeling.36 Additional details on preparation of DNA constructs and 3′ end labeled fluorescent RNAs are given in SI Text.
Binding reaction samples for μMSA were prepared by adding RNA, SAM ligand (as indicated), 2× TB buffer, and dI water in a LoBind eppendorf tube at the indicated concentrations, heating at 70°C for 3 min, cooling for 10 min to avoid denaturing the internal standard(s), adding internal standard(s), and equilibrating at room temperature for 1 hour in the dark. Additional details on protein and chemical reagents are included in SI Text.
Microfluidic Device Fabrication
Optical white soda lime glass microfluidic chips were fabricated with standard wet etch processing by Caliper Life Sciences (Hopkinton, MA). Photopatterning of polymer structures and sieving matrixes in the glass channels was conducted in-house. Open channels were washed and silanized using 3-(trimethoxysilyl)-propyl methacrylate (98%) (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) as described previously.27 Additional details are included in SI Text. 3–10%T and 3–12%T discontinuous polyacrylamide gel architectures were utilized in this work to match the conditions typically used in slab gel formats. The stacking interface has also been shown to increase resolving power.15
μMSA Operation
The μMSA utilizes polyacrylamide gel photopatterned in 80 × 20 μm microfluidic channels that intersect in a ‘t’ pattern.37–39 PA gel-containing glass chips were secured in a custom-built Delrin manifold to expand the reservoirs for each well and minimize external light. The riboswitch and ligand pair were incubated off-chip and 2 μL of sample were pipetted into the sample well (S, Figure 1). All other wells were filled with 50 μL of 1× TB buffer with the appropriate Mg2+ and K+ concentration. Voltage and current monitoring and control at each well was accomplished using a custom built, eight channel high voltage power supply with current/voltage feedback control. Platinum electrodes were inserted into each well. Electrophoretic sample loading was accomplished by applying −3 μA to S, 0 μA to buffer (B) and buffer waste (BW), and grounding well sample waste (SW) for ~ 1 min (E ~ 130 V/cm loading). Electrophoretic separation was initiated by switching the electric field orthogonally to apply −5 μA to well B, 0 μA to S and SW, and grounding well BW (E ~ 240 − 530 V/cm in separation channel). In this step, a plug of sample is injected into the separation channel (B to BW) and the riboswitch and internal standards are allowed to migrate and resolve according to their electrophoretic mobilities.
Imaging and Data Analysis
Full-field images of migration and concentration distributions of separating fluorescent analytes were measured via an IX-70 inverted epi-fluorescent microscope and charge-coupled device (CCD) camera set-up. All microfluidic Kd constants were measured using an inverted laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) microscope. Additional details on the LIF system, microscope set-up, and image processing, are given in SI Text.
The separation resolution (Rs) metric reports the ability to resolve riboswitch populations using PAGE. When Rs < 0.5 and two peaks were expected owing to the presence of ligand, peaks were deemed un-resolved and rapid interconversion was assumed. Rapidly interconverting riboswitch Kd was calculated by fitting a 3-parameter logistic fit binding equation of the form y = β1×[SAM]/(Kd+[SAM])+β3 to a relative mobility (μrel) dose response curve where μrel is RNA mobility relative to an internal standard. More information on the calculation of μrel and fitted parameters is given in SI Text.
When Rs > 0.5, peaks were deemed resolved and slow interconversion was assumed. Riboswitch Kd was calculated by fitting a 3-parameter logistic fit binding equation to the bound peak height dose response curve. Peak height measurements were extracted with a nonlinear Gaussian peak fitting algorithm (GaussAmp) using OriginPro 8.5 (OriginLab, Northampton, MA). More information on the calculation of peak height and fitted variables is given in SI Text.
Design and Modeling of Assay Parameters
To rationally choose the assay parameters and understand the performance improvements gained by moving to a microfluidic format, we compared the Daon and Daoff values that are accessible to slab gels and microfluidic formats for given association and dissociation rates. Bound and unbound riboswitch separation resolution was computationally extracted for varying kon and koff values. Simulations were written and performed in Matlab (Mathworks, Natick, MA). Additional details on the model are included in SI Text and Figure S2.
Analysis of RNA-ligand interactions by slab gel native PAGE
While protected from light, 1–3 pmol fluorescently labeled RNA in 20 μL of TBM10 buffer (90 mM Tris, 89 mM Boric acid, 10 mM MgCl2, pH 8.5) was renatured by heating to 70 °C on a heat block for 3 min followed by a quick table-top centrifugation and slow cooling to room temperature for 1 h. Renaturation of the RNA was performed either in the presence (500 nM or 5 μM) or absence of SAM. The 10%T gel was run with recirculating TBM10 buffer at 4 °C at 200 V (electric field of 8 V/cm) for 17–20 h in the dark. Additional details on run and imaging conditions are given in SI Text. AlexaFluor 488-labeled bovine serum albumin (BSA) or trypsin inhibitor (TI) were used as internal standards and exhibited slower and faster mobility, respectively, than the RNA or RNA-ligand complex.
Analysis of RNA-ligand interactions by in-line probing assay
Ligand binding analysis was performed following standard in-line probing procedures9 with modifications to the buffer conditions to match the conditions used for native PAGE. Additional details are given in SI Text.
To determine Kd, sites were identified whose pattern of spontaneous cleavage changed upon ligand binding. For each of these sites of modulation, the signal intensity was normalized to the observed value at the highest ligand concentration. The fraction of RNA cleaved at each ligand concentration, which corresponds to the fraction of unbound RNA, was taken as the average of the data analyzed for several sites of modulation. The dissociation constant was determined by fitting the experimental data to a best-fit curve for a 1:1 RNA-ligand complex. In-line probing assays for Bs and Pi SAM-I riboswitches and the mapped secondary structure of Pi SAM-I riboswitch are given in Figures S4 and S5.
Analysis of RNA-ligand interactions by μMSA
Screening of Mg2+ and K+ Concentrations
All buffer screening experiments were done with 3–12%T microfluidic gel architectures fabricated in the appropriate buffer. Full field imaging was done on the IX-70 inverted epi-fluorescence microscope set-up. 1x TB buffer with 1 mM Mg2+, 3 mM M2+, 10 mM Mg2+, 1 mM Mg2+ and 10 mM K+, 3 mM Mg2+ and 10 mM K+, 10 mM Mg2+ and 10 mM K+, and 10 mM Mg2+ and 25 mM K+ concentrations were screened. All microfluidic assays in this study utilized a 3–12%T gel architecture fabricated in the appropriate buffer. Statistical significance of a mobility shift was assessed using a two tailed t-test (p < 0.05, n = 3). Additional details are given in SI Text.
Screening of Candidate Riboswitch Functionality
Ligand binding and the resultant conformational change of candidate SAM-I riboswitches Rx, Ac, Ch, Bs, Pi, and Ps were assessed on-chip as described above using full-field imaging on the inverted epi-fluorescence IX-70 microscope. Fluorescein-labeled SAM-I mutant riboswitches M1 and P2 (on-chip) and M1N and P2N (slab gel) were run as negative controls. Additional details are in SI Text. Riboswitch mobility shifts were assessed by comparing riboswitch mobility in no ligand and saturating ligand (7.1 μM) conditions. Statistical significance of the mobility shift was assessed using a two tailed t-test (p < 0.05, n = 3). A 3–10%T gel architecture was used and TBM10 buffer was used in the sample, gel, and run buffers.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by NIH New Innovator Awards (grant #1DP2OD007294 to AEH and grant #1DP2OD008677 to MCH), a NIH NRSA Training Grant in Chemical Biology (JV, SFH), and a NSF CBET Career Award (grant #1056035 to AEH). The authors would also like to acknowledge Jonathan L. McMurry for technical assistance and Augusto Tentori for helpful discussion. KK is a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellow. MCH holds a Career Award at the Scientific Interface from the Burroughs Wellcome Fund. AEH is a Sloan Foundation Research Fellow in chemistry.
Footnotes
Author Contributions
All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
Supporting Information. Quantitative benefit of μMSA, binding and electrokinetic transport model, critical Rs calculation, in-line probing assay results, slab gel mobility resolution, detail on methods, and experimental set-up, sequences of DNA constructs and primers. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
References
- 1.Breaker RR. Mol Cell. 2011;43:867. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.08.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Henkin TM. Genes Dev. 2008;22:3383. doi: 10.1101/gad.1747308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Nahvi A, Sudarsan N, Ebert MS, Zou X, Brown KL, Breaker RR. Chem Biol. 2002;9:1043. doi: 10.1016/s1074-5521(02)00224-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Blount KF, Breaker RR. Nat Biotechnol. 2006;24:1558. doi: 10.1038/nbt1268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dixon N, Duncan JN, Geerlings T, Dunstan MS, McCarthy JEG, Leys D, Micklefield J. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:2830. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0911209107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Paige JS, Nguyen-Duc T, Song W, Jaffrey SR. Science. 2012;335:1194. doi: 10.1126/science.1218298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Weinberg Z, Barrick JE, Yao Z, Roth A, Kim JN, Gore J, Wang JX, Lee ER, Block KF, Sudarsan N. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:4809. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Weinberg Z, Wang JX, Bogue J, Yang J, Corbino K, Moy RH, Breaker RR. Genome Biol. 2010;11:R31. doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-3-r31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Regulski EE, Breaker RR. Methods Mol Biol. 2008;419:53. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-033-1_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Shanahan CA, Gaffney BL, Jones RA, Strobel SA. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:15578. doi: 10.1021/ja204650q. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Heppell B, Mulhbacher J, Penedo JC, Lafontaine DA. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;540:25. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-558-9_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Haller A, Rieder U, Aigner M, Blanchard SC, Micura R. Nat Chem Biol. 2011;7:393. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gilbert SD, Batey RT. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;540:97. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-558-9_8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Roth A, Winkler WC, Regulski EE, Lee BWK, Lim J, Jona I, Barrick JE, Ritwik A, Kim JN, Welz R. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2007;14:308. doi: 10.1038/nsmb1224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hou C, Herr AE. Anal Chem. 2010;82:3343. doi: 10.1021/ac100182j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Fried MG. Electrophoresis. 1989;10:366. doi: 10.1002/elps.1150100515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Chen B, Zuo X, Wang YX, Dayie TK. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:3117. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr1154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Heppell B, Lafontaine DA. Biochemistry. 2008;47:1490. doi: 10.1021/bi701164y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Miller OJ, El Harrak A, Mangeat T, Baret JC, Frenz L, El Debs B, Mayot E, Samuels ML, Rooney EK, Dieu P. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:378. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1113324109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chung K, Kim Y, Kanodia JS, Gong E, Shvartsman SY, Lu H. Nat Methods. 2010;8:171. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lecault V, VanInsberghe M, Sekulovic S, Knapp DJHF, Wohrer S, Bowden W, Viel F, McLaughlin T, Jarandehei A, Miller M. Nat Methods. 2011;8:581. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Nagrath S, Sequist LV, Maheswaran S, Bell DW, Irimia D, Ulkus L, Smith MR, Kwak EL, Digumarthy S, Muzikansky A. Nature. 2007;450:1235. doi: 10.1038/nature06385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Goodrich JA, Kugel JF. Binding and Kinetics for Molecular Biologists. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; Cold Spring Harbor, NY: 2007. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Giddings JC. Unified Separation Science. Wiley New York; New York: 1991. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Woodson SA, Koculi E. Methods Enzymol. 2009;469:189. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(09)69009-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Cann JR. Anal Biochem. 1996;237:1. doi: 10.1006/abio.1996.0193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Karns K, Herr AE. Anal Chem. 2011;83:8115. doi: 10.1021/ac202061v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Winkler WC, Nahvi A, Sudarsan N, Barrick JE, Breaker RR. Nat Struct Biol. 2003;10:701. doi: 10.1038/nsb967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ying BW, Fourmy D, Yoshizawa S. RNA. 2007;13:2042. doi: 10.1261/rna.637907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hayes RL, Noel JK, Mohanty U, Whitford PC, Hennelly SP, Onuchic JN, Sanbonmatsu KY. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:12043. doi: 10.1021/ja301454u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Batey RT, Gilbert SD, Montange RK. Nature. 2004;432:411. doi: 10.1038/nature03037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Heppell B, Blouin S, Dussault AM, Mulhbacher J, Ennifar E, Penedo JC, Lafontaine DA. Nat Chem Biol. 2011;7:384. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Serganov A, Huang L, Patel DJ. Nature. 2008;455:1263. doi: 10.1038/nature07326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Meyer MM, Hammond MC, Salinas Y, Roth A, Sudarsan N, Breaker RR. RNA Biol. 2011;8:5. doi: 10.4161/rna.8.1.13865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Rio DC, Ares M, Nilsen TW. RNA: A laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; Cold Spring Harbor, NY: 2010. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Willkomm D, Hartmann R, Bindereif A, Schon A, Westhof E. Handbook of RNA Biochemistry. Vol. 1 Wiley; 2005. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Herr AE, Singh AK. Anal Chem. 2004;76:4727. doi: 10.1021/ac049686u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Apori AA, Herr AE. Anal Chem. 2011;83:2691. doi: 10.1021/ac103219x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Colyer CL, Mangru SD, Harrison DJ. J Chromatogr, A. 1997;781:271. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9673(97)00502-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.