Skip to main content

Some NLM-NCBI services and products are experiencing heavy traffic, which may affect performance and availability. We apologize for the inconvenience and appreciate your patience. For assistance, please contact our Help Desk at info@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.

Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 1992 Jul;12(7):3006–3014. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.7.3006

Fused protein domains inhibit DNA binding by LexA.

E A Golemis 1, R Brent 1
PMCID: PMC364514  PMID: 1620111

Abstract

Many studies of transcription activation employ fusions of activation domains to DNA binding domains derived from the bacterial repressor LexA and the yeast activator GAL4. Such studies often implicitly assume that DNA binding by the chimeric proteins is equivalent to that of the protein donating the DNA binding moiety. To directly investigate this issue, we compared operator binding by a series of LexA-derivative proteins to operator binding by native LexA, by using both in vivo and in vitro assays. We show that operator binding by many proteins such as LexA-Myc, LexA-Fos, and LexA-Bicoid is severely impaired, while binding of other LexA-derivative proteins, such as those that carry bacterially encoded acidic sequences ("acid blobs"), is not. Our results also show that DNA binding by LexA derivatives that contain the LexA carboxy-terminal dimerization domain (amino acids 88 to 202) is considerably stronger than binding by fusions that lack it and that heterologous dimerization motifs cannot substitute for the LexA88-202 function. These results suggest the need to reevaluate some previous studies of activation that employed LexA derivatives and modifications to recent experimental approaches that use LexA and GAL4 derivatives to detect and study protein-protein interactions.

Full text

PDF
3006

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baleja J. D., Marmorstein R., Harrison S. C., Wagner G. Solution structure of the DNA-binding domain of Cd2-GAL4 from S. cerevisiae. Nature. 1992 Apr 2;356(6368):450–453. doi: 10.1038/356450a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berleth T., Burri M., Thoma G., Bopp D., Richstein S., Frigerio G., Noll M., Nüsslein-Volhard C. The role of localization of bicoid RNA in organizing the anterior pattern of the Drosophila embryo. EMBO J. 1988 Jun;7(6):1749–1756. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03004.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brent R., Ptashne M. A bacterial repressor protein or a yeast transcriptional terminator can block upstream activation of a yeast gene. Nature. 1984 Dec 13;312(5995):612–615. doi: 10.1038/312612a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brent R., Ptashne M. A eukaryotic transcriptional activator bearing the DNA specificity of a prokaryotic repressor. Cell. 1985 Dec;43(3 Pt 2):729–736. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90246-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brent R., Ptashne M. Mechanism of action of the lexA gene product. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Jul;78(7):4204–4208. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.7.4204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brent R., Ptashne M. The lexA gene product represses its own promoter. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Apr;77(4):1932–1936. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.4.1932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brent R. Regulation and autoregulation by lexA protein. Biochimie. 1982 Aug-Sep;64(8-9):565–569. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9084(82)80088-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Brent R. Repression of transcription in yeast. Cell. 1985 Aug;42(1):3–4. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(85)80091-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Carey M., Kakidani H., Leatherwood J., Mostashari F., Ptashne M. An amino-terminal fragment of GAL4 binds DNA as a dimer. J Mol Biol. 1989 Oct 5;209(3):423–432. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90007-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Carey M., Lin Y. S., Green M. R., Ptashne M. A mechanism for synergistic activation of a mammalian gene by GAL4 derivatives. Nature. 1990 May 24;345(6273):361–364. doi: 10.1038/345361a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chien C. T., Bartel P. L., Sternglanz R., Fields S. The two-hybrid system: a method to identify and clone genes for proteins that interact with a protein of interest. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Nov 1;88(21):9578–9582. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.21.9578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Driever W., Nüsslein-Volhard C. A gradient of bicoid protein in Drosophila embryos. Cell. 1988 Jul 1;54(1):83–93. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90182-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ebina Y., Takahara Y., Kishi F., Nakazawa A., Brent R. LexA protein is a repressor of the colicin E1 gene. J Biol Chem. 1983 Nov 10;258(21):13258–13261. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fields S., Song O. A novel genetic system to detect protein-protein interactions. Nature. 1989 Jul 20;340(6230):245–246. doi: 10.1038/340245a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fried M., Crothers D. M. Equilibria and kinetics of lac repressor-operator interactions by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1981 Dec 11;9(23):6505–6525. doi: 10.1093/nar/9.23.6505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Garner M. M., Revzin A. A gel electrophoresis method for quantifying the binding of proteins to specific DNA regions: application to components of the Escherichia coli lactose operon regulatory system. Nucleic Acids Res. 1981 Jul 10;9(13):3047–3060. doi: 10.1093/nar/9.13.3047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Godowski P. J., Picard D., Yamamoto K. R. Signal transduction and transcriptional regulation by glucocorticoid receptor-LexA fusion proteins. Science. 1988 Aug 12;241(4867):812–816. doi: 10.1126/science.3043662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hanes S. D., Brent R. DNA specificity of the bicoid activator protein is determined by homeodomain recognition helix residue 9. Cell. 1989 Jun 30;57(7):1275–1283. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90063-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Harrison S. C., Aggarwal A. K. DNA recognition by proteins with the helix-turn-helix motif. Annu Rev Biochem. 1990;59:933–969. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.59.070190.004441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Heaney M. L., Pierce J., Parsons J. T. Site-directed mutagenesis of the gag-myc gene of avian myelocytomatosis virus 29: biological activity and intracellular localization of structurally altered proteins. J Virol. 1986 Oct;60(1):167–176. doi: 10.1128/jvi.60.1.167-176.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hope I. A., Mahadevan S., Struhl K. Structural and functional characterization of the short acidic transcriptional activation region of yeast GCN4 protein. Nature. 1988 Jun 16;333(6174):635–640. doi: 10.1038/333635a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hope I. A., Struhl K. GCN4, a eukaryotic transcriptional activator protein, binds as a dimer to target DNA. EMBO J. 1987 Sep;6(9):2781–2784. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02573.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ingraham H. A., Flynn S. E., Voss J. W., Albert V. R., Kapiloff M. S., Wilson L., Rosenfeld M. G. The POU-specific domain of Pit-1 is essential for sequence-specific, high affinity DNA binding and DNA-dependent Pit-1-Pit-1 interactions. Cell. 1990 Jun 15;61(6):1021–1033. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90067-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ito H., Fukuda Y., Murata K., Kimura A. Transformation of intact yeast cells treated with alkali cations. J Bacteriol. 1983 Jan;153(1):163–168. doi: 10.1128/jb.153.1.163-168.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Johnson A. D., Pabo C. O., Sauer R. T. Bacteriophage lambda repressor and cro protein: interactions with operator DNA. Methods Enzymol. 1980;65(1):839–856. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(80)65078-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kamens J., Brent R. A yeast transcription assay defines distinct rel and dorsal DNA recognition sequences. New Biol. 1991 Oct;3(10):1005–1013. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kamens J., Richardson P., Mosialos G., Brent R., Gilmore T. Oncogenic transformation by vrel requires an amino-terminal activation domain. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Jun;10(6):2840–2847. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.6.2840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kato G. J., Barrett J., Villa-Garcia M., Dang C. V. An amino-terminal c-myc domain required for neoplastic transformation activates transcription. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Nov;10(11):5914–5920. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.11.5914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Keegan L., Gill G., Ptashne M. Separation of DNA binding from the transcription-activating function of a eukaryotic regulatory protein. Science. 1986 Feb 14;231(4739):699–704. doi: 10.1126/science.3080805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kim B., Little J. W. Dimerization of a specific DNA-binding protein on the DNA. Science. 1992 Jan 10;255(5041):203–206. doi: 10.1126/science.1553548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kraulis P. J., Raine A. R., Gadhavi P. L., Laue E. D. Structure of the DNA-binding domain of zinc GAL4. Nature. 1992 Apr 2;356(6368):448–450. doi: 10.1038/356448a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lamerichs R. M., Padilla A., Boelens R., Kaptein R., Ottleben G., Rüterjans H., Granger-Schnarr M., Oertel P., Schnarr M. The amino-terminal domain of LexA repressor is alpha-helical but differs from canonical helix-turn-helix proteins: a two-dimensional 1H NMR study. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Sep;86(18):6863–6867. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.18.6863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Landsman D., Bustin M. Assessment of the transcriptional activation potential of the HMG chromosomal proteins. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Sep;11(9):4483–4489. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.9.4483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Laughon A., Gesteland R. F. Isolation and preliminary characterization of the GAL4 gene, a positive regulator of transcription in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Nov;79(22):6827–6831. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.22.6827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Lech K., Anderson K., Brent R. DNA-bound Fos proteins activate transcription in yeast. Cell. 1988 Jan 29;52(2):179–184. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90506-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Lin Y. S., Carey M., Ptashne M., Green M. R. How different eukaryotic transcriptional activators can cooperate promiscuously. Nature. 1990 May 24;345(6273):359–361. doi: 10.1038/345359a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Little J. W., Hill S. A. Deletions within a hinge region of a specific DNA-binding protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Apr;82(8):2301–2305. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.8.2301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Little J. W., Mount D. W. The SOS regulatory system of Escherichia coli. Cell. 1982 May;29(1):11–22. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90085-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Little J. W., Mount D. W., Yanisch-Perron C. R. Purified lexA protein is a repressor of the recA and lexA genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Jul;78(7):4199–4203. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.7.4199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Luisi B. F., Xu W. X., Otwinowski Z., Freedman L. P., Yamamoto K. R., Sigler P. B. Crystallographic analysis of the interaction of the glucocorticoid receptor with DNA. Nature. 1991 Aug 8;352(6335):497–505. doi: 10.1038/352497a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Ma J., Ptashne M. A new class of yeast transcriptional activators. Cell. 1987 Oct 9;51(1):113–119. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90015-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Ma J., Ptashne M. The carboxy-terminal 30 amino acids of GAL4 are recognized by GAL80. Cell. 1987 Jul 3;50(1):137–142. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90670-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Marmorstein R., Carey M., Ptashne M., Harrison S. C. DNA recognition by GAL4: structure of a protein-DNA complex. Nature. 1992 Apr 2;356(6368):408–414. doi: 10.1038/356408a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Nelson C., Crenshaw E. B., 3rd, Franco R., Lira S. A., Albert V. R., Evans R. M., Rosenfeld M. G. Discrete cis-active genomic sequences dictate the pituitary cell type-specific expression of rat prolactin and growth hormone genes. Nature. 1986 Aug 7;322(6079):557–562. doi: 10.1038/322557a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Nelson M., Silver P. Context affects nuclear protein localization in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Feb;9(2):384–389. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.2.384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. O'Shea E. K., Rutkowski R., Stafford W. F., 3rd, Kim P. S. Preferential heterodimer formation by isolated leucine zippers from fos and jun. Science. 1989 Aug 11;245(4918):646–648. doi: 10.1126/science.2503872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Olesen J. T., Guarente L. The HAP2 subunit of yeast CCAAT transcriptional activator contains adjacent domains for subunit association and DNA recognition: model for the HAP2/3/4 complex. Genes Dev. 1990 Oct;4(10):1714–1729. doi: 10.1101/gad.4.10.1714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Ptashne M. How eukaryotic transcriptional activators work. Nature. 1988 Oct 20;335(6192):683–689. doi: 10.1038/335683a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Reddy E. P., Reynolds R. K., Watson D. K., Schultz R. A., Lautenberger J., Papas T. S. Nucleotide sequence analysis of the proviral genome of avian myelocytomatosis virus (MC29). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 May;80(9):2500–2504. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.9.2500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Richardson P. M., Gilmore T. D. vRel is an inactive member of the Rel family of transcriptional activating proteins. J Virol. 1991 Jun;65(6):3122–3130. doi: 10.1128/jvi.65.6.3122-3130.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Roux P., Blanchard J. M., Fernandez A., Lamb N., Jeanteur P., Piechaczyk M. Nuclear localization of c-Fos, but not v-Fos proteins, is controlled by extracellular signals. Cell. 1990 Oct 19;63(2):341–351. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90167-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Ruden D. M., Ma J., Li Y., Wood K., Ptashne M. Generating yeast transcriptional activators containing no yeast protein sequences. Nature. 1991 Mar 21;350(6315):250–252. doi: 10.1038/350250a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Salmeron J. M., Jr, Leuther K. K., Johnston S. A. GAL4 mutations that separate the transcriptional activation and GAL80-interactive functions of the yeast GAL4 protein. Genetics. 1990 May;125(1):21–27. doi: 10.1093/genetics/125.1.21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Samson M. L., Jackson-Grusby L., Brent R. Gene activation and DNA binding by Drosophila Ubx and abd-A proteins. Cell. 1989 Jun 16;57(6):1045–1052. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90342-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Sauer R. T., Nelson H. C., Hehir K., Hecht M. H., Gimble F. S., DeAnda J., Poteete A. R. The lambda and P22 phage repressors. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1983 Dec;1(4):1011–1022. doi: 10.1080/07391102.1983.10507499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Schleif R. DNA binding by proteins. Science. 1988 Sep 2;241(4870):1182–1187. doi: 10.1126/science.2842864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Schnarr M., Granger-Schnarr M., Hurstel S., Pouyet J. The carboxy-terminal domain of the LexA repressor oligomerises essentially as the entire protein. FEBS Lett. 1988 Jul 4;234(1):56–60. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(88)81302-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Schnarr M., Pouyet J., Granger-Schnarr M., Daune M. Large-scale purification, oligomerization equilibria, and specific interaction of the LexA repressor of Escherichia coli. Biochemistry. 1985 May 21;24(11):2812–2818. doi: 10.1021/bi00332a032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Steitz T. A. Structural studies of protein-nucleic acid interaction: the sources of sequence-specific binding. Q Rev Biophys. 1990 Aug;23(3):205–280. doi: 10.1017/s0033583500005552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Stone J., de Lange T., Ramsay G., Jakobovits E., Bishop J. M., Varmus H., Lee W. Definition of regions in human c-myc that are involved in transformation and nuclear localization. Mol Cell Biol. 1987 May;7(5):1697–1709. doi: 10.1128/mcb.7.5.1697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Thliveris A. T., Little J. W., Mount D. W. Repression of the E coli recA gene requires at least two LexA protein monomers. Biochimie. 1991 Apr;73(4):449–456. doi: 10.1016/0300-9084(91)90112-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Wagner P., Kunz J., Koller A., Hall M. N. Active transport of proteins into the nucleus. FEBS Lett. 1990 Nov 26;275(1-2):1–5. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(90)81425-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Walker G. C. Inducible DNA repair systems. Annu Rev Biochem. 1985;54:425–457. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.54.070185.002233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. West R. W., Jr, Yocum R. R., Ptashne M. Saccharomyces cerevisiae GAL1-GAL10 divergent promoter region: location and function of the upstream activating sequence UASG. Mol Cell Biol. 1984 Nov;4(11):2467–2478. doi: 10.1128/mcb.4.11.2467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES