In this article, noninvasive diffuse optical technologies are briefly introduced for the future application for lymphoma diagnosis/treatment monitoring. Diffuse optical technologies measure tumor physiology in deep tissues in vivo, and have demonstrated its efficacy for tumor detection and chemotherapy response monitoring in breast cancer.1–8 Light has been used to see tumors in thick human tissues for more than 80 years.9 Based on the same fundamental idea that the interaction between the light and tumor provides its pathology related information, biomedical optics technology has advanced to be more quantitative and more accurate so that it can be used for tumor diagnosis and treatment monitoring.
One of the most commonly used optical imaging technologies is bright-field microscopy, which is generally employed to see histologically stained cells in a small piece of excised tissue. Although its role is invaluable in tumor diagnosis, the excised tissues lose significant amount of information that can be only preserved in embedded tissues. Diffuse optical technology, a relatively new technology to clinicians, provides pathophysiological changes in thick in vivo tissues noninvasively.3–5,10–12 Diffuse optical technology uses near-infrared (NIR) light and a mathematical model that describes transport of photons in a diffusion regime; photons are modeled to behave as stochastic particles that travel in proportion to a gradient, similar to diffusion of molecules (Fig. 1).13 In the NIR, there is a therapeutic window (approximately from 600–1000 nm) where absorption of water and hemoglobin is lower than visual and infrared wavelength range (Fig. 2).14,15 As a result, more photons survive to be detected after interacting with the tissues, making the diffuse optics suitable for deep tissue measurement.
Fig. 1.

(A) Photons come out from the source on the surface of the skin then undergo scattering and absorption while interacting with the tissues. (B) A simulated photon sensitivity map. The photons survived after going through multiple absorption, and scattering steps in a banana-shaped region are detected, also on the surface of the skin a few centimeters away from the source.
Fig. 2.

Extinction coefficient spectra of major tissue chromophores measured in the near infrared.
When photons travel in thick tissues (> 1–2 mm), they scatter against the tissue components and dominate over absorption. The photons are scattered more often (typically after traveling approximately 20 μm) than absorbed (after approximately 10 cm) in tissues. The scattering reflects size and density of intracellular structures such as nuclei16 and mitochondria,17 and extracelluar matrix, such as collagen.18 Dynamic motion of scatters, such as red blood cells, are also measured by a blood flow index using diffuse correlation spectroscopy (DCS).14
Most tissue components have their unique absorption profile in the NIR, and their concentration or molecular binding state can be quantified when the effect of multiscattering is cancelled using the mathematical diffusion model and modulated light either in time, frequency, or spatial domain.19–21 The scattering in thick tissues is measured first using a photon migration model, a diffusion approximation to the radiative transfer equation, and the Mie theory (Fig. 3).22,23 Then, the power-law fit scattering spectrum is subtracted from the overall light measurement, which leaves only an absorption spectrum.6,19 Most frequently obtained physiologic information from the tissue absorption spectrum are tissue oxygenation and concentrations of oxy-, deoxy- and total hemoglobin, lipid, and water. Also, the molecular binding state of water and deep tissue temperature are measured using quantitative water absorption spectra.5,6,19 In breast cancer clinical studies, the tumor tissues have been detected with high sensitivity (98%) and specificity (90%) by measuring total hemoglobin concentration ratio of tumor to normal tissues.10 Optically measured tissue bound water index (BWI) showed a high correlation (R = −0.96, P = .002) with histopathologically assessed tumor grades.5 Diffuse optical spectroscopy (DOS) can also predict pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in a few days, even on day 1 into the therapy by measuring tissue physiologic changes noninvasively.24,25 A recent publication also suggested that the combination of DOS measured deep tissue temperature and tissue oxygenation may provide apoptotic status of cells during neoadjuvant chemotherapy.11 The DOS measured spectra can be mapped into a 2-dimensional spectroscopic image as shown in Fig. 4, and this method was named diffuse optical spectroscopic imaging (DOSI) by the Tromberg group at the Univeristy of California, Irvine.13
Fig. 3.

Reduced scattering μs'(λ) (top) and absorption μa(λ) (bottom) coefficients spectra from in vivo human tissues. The reduced scattering spectra is fit to a power law according to the Mie theory then subtracted from a reflectance spectrum to obtain the absorption spectrum shown below.
Fig. 4.

An example of a diffuse optical spectroscopic imaging (DOSI) image (left). TOI stands for tissue optical index, which is a combined optical index of multiplication of deoxy-hemoglobin and water divided by lipid concentrations. The shown image is a spectroscopic map of 50 × 55 mm diameter infiltrating ducal carcinoma tumor in a 43-year-old subject. (Right) Near infrared absorption and reduced scattering spectra obtained by DOSI shown for specific regions of the image.
For lymphoma measurement, a hand-held probe with optical fibers coupled to a source and detector can be placed on the lesion area directly. With a hand-held probe, DOS/DCS can detect photons reflected back after traveling a tissue volume at depths up to several centimeters. Thus, with this set-up, DOS/DCS can only measure palpable lymphoma. However, the instrument can be brought into the examination room and does not require special shielding. Furthermore, it is capable of providing tumor pathophysiology in real time so that the physician can use the information during the patient's visit. DOS/DCS is also harmless (no risk of ionizing radiation) and does not need injection of any contrast agents or radioactive material. Instead, it can quantify endogeneous biochemical composition, which can consequently provide the pathologic state of the tumor. For example, the diffuse optics measured hemoglobin concentration and blood flow can communicate vascular structure changes that occur in response to chemotherapy or molecularly targeted therapy.24,26,27 Alteration of tissue structural composition during the therapy can be monitored by measuring lipid concentration variations using DOS.1 Water concentration variation may reflect edema, inflammation, or interstitial fluid pressure changes.5,28 Tissue water binding state measurement can communicate the invasiveness of the tumor that may appear as an overall extracellular composition change that also alters the association of macromolecules with water.5,29 Noninvasive tissue temperature measurement provides enthalpy variation in the tumor due to mitochondrial changes, such as uncoupling of their membranes as a part of apoptotic process.11 Additionally, tissue oxygen measurement communicates if the tumor is under hypoxia, which may predict bad prognosis.30 Lastly, antibodies, drugs, or biologic agents tagged with a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved NIR dye (such as indocyanine green) could be injected into the body to be measured with diffuse optical technologies to study certain signal pathways in tissues in vivo.
Ongoing clinical studies using diffuse optical technologies include differentiating various types of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma) and monitoring tumor response during chemotherapy/molecularly targeted therapy. During the author's clinical studies using diffuse optical technologies, patients volunteered cheerfully due to its noninvasiveness and simplicity. Although the diffuse optical technologies have just begun to be used for lymphoma measurement, they hold a great potential for providing tumor pathophysiological information conveniently in the examination room, which might help physicians to optimize the therapy for each patient during the visit.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by NIH R01-CA75124, R01-EB002109 and Susan G. Komen for the Cure Postdoctoral Fellowship.
REFERENCES
- 1.Cerussi AE, Shah N, Hsiang D, et al. In vivo absorption, scattering, and physiologic properties of 58 malignant breast tumors determined by broadband diffuse optical spectroscopy. J Biomed Opt. 2006;11(4):044005. doi: 10.1117/1.2337546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Chance B, Nioka S, Zhang J, et al. Breast cancer detection based on incremental biochemical and physiological properties of breast cancers: a six-year, two-site study. Acad Radiol. 2005;12:925–33. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2005.04.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chung SH, Cerussi A, Mehta R, et al. Noninvasive detection and monitoring of tumor pathological grade during neoadjuvant chemotherapy by measuring tissue water state using diffuse optical spectroscopic imaging. Cancer Res. 2009;69(2):101S. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chung SH, Cerussi AE, Hsiang D, et al. Non-invasive measurement of pathological heterogeneity of cancer tissues using water state information from diffuse optical spectroscopic imaging. Cancer Res. 2009;69(24):767S. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chung SH, Cerussi AE, Klifa C, et al. In vivo water state measurements in breast cancer using broadband diffuse optical spectroscopy. Phys Med Biol. 2008;53(23):6713–27. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/23/005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chung SH, Cerussi AE, Merritt SI, et al. Noninvasive tissue temperature measurements based on quantitative diffuse optical spectroscopy (DOS) of water. Phys Med Biol. 2010;55(13):3753–65. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/13/012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pogue BW, Jiang S, Dehghani H, et al. Characterization of hemoglobin, water, and NIR scattering in breast tissue: analysis of intersubject variability and menstrual cycle changes. J Biomed Opt. 2004;9:541–52. doi: 10.1117/1.1691028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Spinelli L, Torricelli A, Pifferi A, et al. Bulk optical properties and tissue components in the female breast from multiwavelength time-resolved optical mammography. J Biomed Opt. 2004;9:1137–42. doi: 10.1117/1.1803546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cutler M. Transillumination of the breast. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1929;48:721–7. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Choe R, Konecky SD, Corlu A, et al. Differentiation of benign and malignant breast tumors by in-vivo three-dimensional parallel-plate diffuse optical tomography. J Biomed Opt. 2009;14(2):024020. doi: 10.1117/1.3103325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chung SH, Mehta R, Tromberg BJ, et al. Noninvasive measurement of deep tissue temperature changes caused by apoptosis during breast cancer neoadjuvant therapy: a case study. J Innov Opt Health Sci. 2011;4(4):361–72. doi: 10.1142/S1793545811001708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tromberg BJ, Pogue BW, Paulsen KD, et al. Assessing the future of diffuse optical imaging technologies for breast cancer management. Med Phys. 2008;35(6):2443–51. doi: 10.1118/1.2919078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Tromberg BJ, Cerussi AE, Chung SH, et al. Broadband diffuse optical spectroscopic imaging. In: Boas DA, Pitris C, Ramanujam N, editors. Handbook of biomedical optics. CRC Press; 2011. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Durduran T, Choe R, Baker WB, et al. Diffuse optics for tissue monitoring and tomography. Rep Progr Phys. 2010;73(7):1–43. doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/73/7/076701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Jöbis-vander VF. Discovery of the near-infrared window into the body andthe early development of near-infrared spectroscopy. J Biomed Opt. 1999;4:392–6. doi: 10.1117/1.429952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Mourant JR, Canpolat M, Brocker C, et al. Light scattering from cells: the contribution of the nucleus and the effects of proliferative status. J Biomed Opt. 2000;5:131–7. doi: 10.1117/1.429979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Beauvoit B, Chance B. Time-resolved spectroscopy of mitochondria, cells and tissues under normal and pathological conditions. Mol Cell Biochem. 1998;184:445–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Weingarten MS, Papazoglou ES, Zubkov L, et al. Correlation of near infrared absorption and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy scattering with tissue neovascularization and collagen concentration in a diabetic rat wound healing model. Wound Repair Regen. 2008;16:234–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2008.00364.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bevilacqua F, Berger AJ, Cerussi AE, et al. Broadband absorption spectroscopy in turbid media by combined frequency-domain and steady-state methods. Appl Opt. 2000;39(34):6498–507. doi: 10.1364/ao.39.006498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cuccia DJ, Bevilacqua F, Durkin AJ, et al. Quantitation and mapping of tissue optical properties using modulated imaging. J Biomed Opt. 2009;14(2):024012. doi: 10.1117/1.3088140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sevick EM, Change B, Leigh J, et al. Quantitation of time-resolved and frequency-resolved optical spectra for the determination of tissue oxygenation. Anal Biochem. 1991;195:330–51. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(91)90339-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Haskell RC, Svaasand LO, Tsay TT, et al. Boundary conditions for the diffusion equation in radiative transfer. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1994;11:2727–41. doi: 10.1364/josaa.11.002727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Nilsson AM, Sturesson KC, Liu DL, et al. Changes in spectral shape of tissue optical properties in conjunction with laser-induced thermotherapy. Appl Opt. 1998;37:1256–67. doi: 10.1364/ao.37.001256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Cerussi A, Hsiang D, Shah N, et al. Predicting response to breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy using diffuse optical spectroscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(10):4014–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0611058104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Roblyer D, Ueda S, Cerussi A, et al. Optical imaging of breast cancer oxyhemoglobin flare correlates with neoadjuvant chemotherapy response one day after starting treatment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(35):14626–31. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1013103108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tromberg BJ, Cerussi A, Shah N, et al. Imaging in breast cancer: diffuse optics in breast cancer: detecting tumors in pre-menopausal women and monitoring neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res. 2005;7:279–85. doi: 10.1186/bcr1358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zhou C, Choe R, Shah N, et al. Diffuse optical monitoring of blood flow and oxygenation in human breast cancer during early stages of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Biomed Opt. 2007;12(5):051903. doi: 10.1117/1.2798595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tromberg BJ, Cerussi AE. Imaging Breast Cancer Chemotherapy Responses with Light, Commentary on Soliman et al., p. 2605. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:2486–8. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-0397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Toole BP. Hyaluronan: from extracellular glue to peri-cellular cue. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4(7):528–39. doi: 10.1038/nrc1391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Schindl M, Schoppmann SF, Samonigg H, et al. Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group. Overexpression of hypoxia-induced factor 1α is associated with an unfavorable prognosis in lymph node-positive breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2002;8:1831–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
