Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 May 7.
Published in final edited form as: J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2011;24(0):683–687. doi: 10.1515/jpem.2011.322

Retinol-binding protein 4 correlates with triglycerides but not insulin resistance in prepubertal children with and without premature adrenarche

Aviva B Sopher 1, Adrienne T Gerken 1, Eun-Ju Lee 1, William E Blaner 2, Stefanie Deeds 1, Dympna Gallagher 2, Dikoma C Shungu 3, Xiangling Mao 3, Abeer Hassoun 1, Donald J McMahon 2, Sharon E Oberfield 1
PMCID: PMC3646629  NIHMSID: NIHMS459933  PMID: 22145457

Abstract

Background

Retinol-binding protein 4 (RBP4) has been proposed as an early marker for insulin resistance (IR), but no prior studies have addressed RBP4 in an exclusively prepubertal population. Children with premature adrenarche (PA) are at increased risk for IR and metabolic syndrome (MeS), thus finding an appropriate early marker for IR in this population would allow for early intervention and prevention of morbidity related to IR and MeS.

Objective

To determine whether prepubertal children with PA have higher levels of RBP4 than controls and whether RBP4 correlates with comorbidities of metabolic disease in prepubertal children.

Subjects

This study comprised 49 prepubertal children (24 with PA and 25 control subjects), 20 boys and 29 girls, who were between the ages of 5 and 9 years.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional, case-control study conducted in a subspecialty ambulatory clinic based in a quaternary care center. RBP4 levels, hormonal values, lipids and response to an oral glucose tolerance test were evaluated in children with PA and controls, and body composition measures were obtained in a subset of patients (n=18).

Results

RBP4 correlated with triglycerides (r = 0.57, P < 0.0001) but did not correlate with IR in a body mass index z-score-adjusted Pearson correlation analysis. There was no difference in RBP4 levels between the PA and control groups.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that RBP4 may be an early marker of dyslipidemia, which may herald future onset of hepatic IR, polycystic ovary syndrome and MeS.

Keywords: premature adrenarche, premature pubarche, retinol-binding protein 4, insulin resistance

Introduction

Precocious pubarche is the appearance of sexual hair before 8 years in girls and 9 years in boys, without signs of true puberty. Premature adrenarche (PA) describes individuals with precocious pubarche whose adrenal androgens are elevated for age, but are within range for Tanner stage for pubic hair, and without evidence of enzymatic defects of steroidogenesis, precocious puberty, or adrenal or gonadal malignancy1. PA is caused by early maturation of the adrenal zona reticularis or increased peripheral sensitivity to adrenal hormones1 and is associated with obesity2,3. Until recently, PA was thought to be a benign process, but studies demonstrate that children with PA have increased future risk of metabolic syndrome (MeS), and affected girls are more likely to develop polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), even in the absence of obesity4. It would therefore be beneficial to have early markers to screen children with PA for risk of developing metabolic disease.

Retinol-binding protein 4 (RBP4) is an adipokine secreted primarily by the liver and, to a lesser extent, adipose tissue and may be an early marker of insulin resistance (IR) or involved in its pathogenesis5. An elevation in circulating RBP4 is associated with GLUT4 dysregulation6. Additionally, RBP4 may be linked to hepatic IR through its effect on the peroxisome proliferator activated receptor family (PPAR), a regulator of fatty acid metabolism, and thus may herald the onset of MeS6,7. Mouse models suggest that RBP4 may play a causative role in IR5,6, yet clinical studies in adults and children have yielded conflicting results regarding this relationship8,9,10. The relationship of RBP4 with serum triglycerides has been more consistent11,12.

Several studies have examined RBP4 in women with PCOS. One showed higher RBP4 in the PCOS group, whereas another demonstrated no difference compared to controls13,14. No study, to our knowledge, has described RBP4 in exclusively prepubertal children or in children with PA.

The goal of this study was to determine whether RBP4 may function as a marker for future metabolic risk in prepubertal children with PA and/or obesity. Our primary hypothesis was that children with PA with or without obesity will have higher RBP4 than control subjects. Our secondary hypothesis was that RBP4 will correlate with IR and triglycerides.

Materials and Methods

Subjects

The study group comprised 49 prepubertal children (29 girls, 20 boys) ages 5–9 years, 24 with PA and 25 controls (Table 1). Both groups were predominantly Hispanic (PA 79% and control 84%) and primarily from the Dominican Republic. Ethnicity was determined by self-report of black, white or Hispanic background of both parents and all four grandparents; those with backgrounds that did not fit these criteria were classified as “other.”

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics of the study population

PA (n=24) Control (n=25) P value
Age (years) 7.7 ± 1.4 7.2 ± 1.5 NS
Height (cm) 128.2 ± 9.6 126.4 ± 8.9 NS
Weight (kg) 32.8 ± 10.3 36.2 ± 12.6 NS
Waist circumference (cm) 65.3 ± 11.3 70.9 ± 13.6 NS
BMI z-score 1.2 ± 1.1 1.8 ± 1.0 0.04
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 97.1 ± 11.1 102.3 ± 12.7 NS
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) 61.1 ± 7.7 62.2 ± 6.8 NS

The results are expressed as mean ± SD; NS, not significant.

Subjects were recruited from the pediatric ambulatory services of Children’s Hospital of New York, Columbia University Medical Center (CUMC). Informed consent was obtained from a parent or guardian and assent was obtained from subjects older than 7 years. The protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of CUMC and St. Luke’s-Roosevelt Hospital Center.

The diagnosis of precocious pubarche was made clinically. The inclusion criteria for PA were: 1) onset of pubic and/or axillary hair before age 8 years in girls or 9 years in boys; 2) no clitoromegaly in girls; 3) Tanner stage 1 breasts in girls or testicular volume ≤ 3cc in boys; and 4) no evidence of 21-hydroxylase deficiency, as documented by basal 17-hydroxyprogesterone, or of other adrenal or gonadal disorder by hormonal analysis. The inclusion criteria for controls were: 1) Tanner stage 1 pubic hair and 2) Tanner stage 1 breasts in girls or testicular volume ≤ 3cc in boys. Exclusion criteria for all subjects included: 1) gestational history complicated by gestational diabetes, multiple gestation, preterm delivery, or small for gestational age; 2) chronic medical conditions; 3) chronic glucocorticoid or other hormonal therapy.

Pubertal and clinical assessment

Pubertal and clinical assessment of subjects was performed on the day of testing at the Pediatric Outpatient Unit of the Clinical Research Resource affiliated with the Irving Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, CUMC. Breasts, male genitalia and pubic hair were assessed using the rating scales of Tanner and Marshall. Testicular volumes were estimated using the orchidometer of Prader. Height, weight, heart rate and blood pressure (BP) were measured; body mass index (BMI) and BMI z-scores were calculated using reference data15.

Procedures

Blood samples were drawn between 0800 and 0900 h after an overnight fast for basal RBP4, glucose (G0), insulin (I0), dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS), androstenedione, T, free T, lutenizing hormone (LH), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), hemoglobin A1c, lipids, and thyroid function tests. Glucose and insulin levels were measured at 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes after a 1.75g/kg (maximum 75g) oral glucose tolerance load using GlutolR (Paddock Laboratories, Minneapolis, MN, USA).

Measures of insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion

Fasting glucose to insulin ratio (FGIR)16, homeostasis model assessment (HOMA)17, insulin sensitivity measure (SiM)18, whole-body insulin sensitivity index (WBISI)19, insulin area under the curve (IAUC) and glucose area under the curve (GAUC)20 were calculated as measures of IR.

Assays

RBP4 was measured by ELISA (ALPCO, Salem, NH, USA). The following labs were measured by Esoterix Laboratories: insulin by immunochemiluminescent assay; DHEAS by radioimmunoassay after enzymolysis; androstenedione and T by high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry; free T by equilibrium dialysis, sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), FSH, LH, and hemoglobin A1c. The following were measured in the Core Laboratory, CUMC: plasma glucose by the glucose hexokinase method; serum total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein, and triglycerides by Hitachi analyzer; low-density lipoprotein was calculated.

Body Composition

Body composition analysis was performed on a subgroup of study subjects. Truncal subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) were measured using contiguous-slice magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis (GE 6x Horizon 1.5T GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA) (PA: n = 8, control: n = 7); Intramyocellular lipid content (IMCL) was measured using single-voxel 1H NMR spectroscopy (GE 6x Horizon 1.5T; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA) of the right tibialis anterior muscle (PA: n = 9, control: n = 7). Trunk fat (TF) and percentage body fat (%BF) were determined using whole-body dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) (GE Lunar DPX (L) and Prodigy; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA) (PA: n = 11, control: n = 7).

Statistical Analysis

Comparison of groups for continuous variables were achieved by Student’s t-test for age, height, weight, and BMI z-score, and by BMI z-score adjusted analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) for BP, RBP4, lipids, T, free T, DHEAS, androstenedione and OGTT-derived IR measures (n = 49) and for subgroup analyses of VAT and SAT (PA: n = 8, control: n = 7); IMCL (PA: n = 9, control: n = 7); and TF and %BF (PA: n = 11, control: n= 7).

Pearson correlations were performed on the entire group (n = 49) and on body composition subgroups. Correlations assessed the association between RBP4 and BMI Z-score, BP, lipids, T, free T, DHEAS, androstenedione, G0, GAUC, I0, IAUC, OGTT derived IR measures, VAT, SAT, IMCL, TF and %BF.

P- values of < 0.05 were considered to represent statistical significance for all analyses.

Results

Clinical Characteristics

Age, height, weight, BP, and waist circumference were similar in the PA and control groups (Table 1). BMI z-score was significantly higher in the control group compared to the PA group.

Hormonal and Metabolic Characteristics and Body Composition

DHEAS, androstenedione, T, free T, and IAUC were higher and SHBG, SiM and WBISI were lower in the PA group (P < 0.05 for all). There were no differences in RBP4 or lipids between the groups or among VAT, SAT, IMCL, TF or % BF in the subgroup analyses (Tables 2 and 3).

Table 2.

Hormonal and metabolic characteristics of the study populationa

PA (n=24) Control (n=25) P valueb
Retinol-binding protein 4 (mg/L) 16.7 ± 6.4 14.3 ± 5.5 NS
Testosterone (ng/dL) 6.0 ± 2.7 3.5 ± 0.8 0.0003
Free Testosterone (pg/mL) 0.48 ± 0.27 0.30 ± 0.18 0.0003
DHEAS (ug/dL) 53.4 ± 42.1 22.1 ± 18.9 0.002
SHBG (nmol/L) 89.1 ± 32.5 105.3 ± 52.0 0.02
Androstenedione (ng/dL) 46.2 ± 16.5 29.4 ± 7.3 <0.0001
Cholesterol (mg/dL) 161.0 ± 26.4 164.0 ± 32.0 NS
Triglycerides (mg/dL) 72.0 ± 26.2 77.9 ± 40.0 NS
LDL (mg/dL) 90.3 ± 23.6 97.0 ± 32.6 NS
HDL (mg/dL) 56.3 ± 9.7 51.6 ± 12.1 NS
Glucose (mg/dL, 0 min) 88.8 ± 7.0 90.1 ± 7.8 NS
Glucose (mg/dL, AUC) 233.5 ± 45.1 221.4 ± 51.1 NS
Insulin (uU/mL, 0 min) 7.2 ± 6.2 5.7 ± 2.8 NS
Insulin (uU/mL, AUC) 71.6 ± 38.3 54.3 ± 37.8 0.02
FGIR 21.7 ± 17.1 21.7 ± 17.9 NS
HOMA 1.3 ± 0.7 1.6 ± 1.4 NS
SiM 10.0 ± 11.1 13.7 ± 14.4 0.002
WBISI 10.4 ± 6.3 11.1 ± 7.6 0.04
a

Results are expressed as mean ± SD;

b

BMI Z-score adjusted analysis. AUC, area under the curve; NS, not significant

Table 3.

Body composition in a subgroup of subjectsa

PA (n = 24) Control (n = 25) P valueb
Visceral adipose tissue (L) c 0.46 ± 0.44 0.53 ± 0.41 NS
Subcutaneous adipose tissue (L) c 3.6 ± 2.6 3.2 ± 1.5 NS
Intramyocellular lipid/water ratiod 0.040 ± 0.021 0.036 ± 0.013 NS
%, Body fat percentagee 29.8 ± 13.8 29.3 ± 5.5 NS
Trunk fat (kg)e 4.7 ± 3.4 3.7 ± 2.3 NS
a

The results are expressed as mean ± SD;

b

BMI Z-score adjusted;

c

7 control, 8 PA;

d

7 control, 9 PA;

e

7 control, 11 PA.

Pearson correlation analysis

RBP4 correlated with serum triglycerides (r = 0.57, P < 0.0001) in the entire group. In subgroup analyses the correlations were: PA (n=24; r=0.72, p=0.0001); controls (n=25; r=0.58, p=0.007); girls (n=29; r=0.72, p<0.0001); and boys (n=20; r=0.56, p=0.009). There was no correlation between RBP4 and IR, body composition parameters in the entire group, or in any of the subgroups.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine RBP4 in an exclusively prepubertal cohort, and the first to examine it in PA, a group that is at high risk for development of MeS and PCOS3,4. We demonstrate a significant correlation between RBP4 and serum triglycerides for the combined population of prepubertal children with and without PA.

Our results are consistent with reports showing a link between RBP4 and features of MeS in mixed populations of children and adolescents, which have demonstrated an association between RBP4 and elevated triglycerides11,12,21,22. Our findings suggest that RBP4 may be a marker of early MeS even in this very young population. In this study, RBP4 did not distinguish those with PA from controls; however, lipid parameters did not differ between PA and controls in this study.

Insulin sensitivity in PA subjects was reduced compared with controls by WBISI, SiM, and IAUC but not by HOMA or FGIR. Glucose and insulin during the first 30 minutes of the OGTT reflect hepatic IR, while glucose disposal after 60 minutes reflects peripheral (skeletal muscle) uptake23. WBISI, SiM, and IAUC incorporate post-60-minute values of glucose and insulin, while HOMA and FGIR utilize only fasting levels. It is possible that we do not see an increase in RBP4 in children with PA compared to controls because they have not yet developed hepatic IR, and RBP4 may be a better marker of hepatic IR than of peripheral IR7. Our findings are in agreement with other pediatric studies showing no correlation between RBP4 and IR24, although Yeste et al. 22 show a correlation between RBP4 and muscle IR but not hepatic IR, and others have shown a correlation between RBP4 and IR6,12,21,25.

We did not find significant differences between PA and control groups for body composition measures, nor did we find correlations between RBP4 and these measures. However, the sample size for this subset may have been too small to detect intergroup differences and to adjust for age, a potentially important confounding variable.

Our study limitations include the relatively small number of study subjects, the higher BMI z-score in the control group, and the limited number of participating boys with PA. Additionally, our population was primarily Caribbean Hispanic; therefore our findings are not necessarily applicable to other ethnic groups.

In summary, in this study of exclusively prepubertal children with and without PA, RBP4 correlated with serum triglyceride level. However, we did not find a correlation between RBP4 and IR. Although differences in RBP4 or serum lipids were not found between children with and without PA, children with PA had more IR than controls, suggesting that early metabolic abnormalities may be present in prepubertal children with PA. Further research is needed before RBP4 can be established as a marker for metabolic dysfunction, although its correlation with triglycerides in young children suggests that RBP4 may indicate early features of MeS. Large-scale pediatric population studies are needed to clarify the utility of RBP4 as an early marker of MeS and to establish clinically applicable cutoffs and longitudinal studies of prepubertal children are necessary to define the relationship of RBP4 with metabolic markers over time. Additionally, it will be of interest to study RBP4 in other pediatric populations at risk for MeS, including obese children and adolescents with PCOS.

Acknowledgments

Supported in part by:

  1. NIH/NIDDK T32 DK065522 (Principal Investigator, SE Oberfield) Training Grant in Pediatric Endocrinology, National Institutes of Health (SEO)

  2. General Clinical Research Center grant: RR00645

  3. Irving Institute for Clinical and Translational Research CTSA grant UL1RR024156 (AS)

  4. NIH/NIDDK Medical Student Research Training Program grant 3T32DK065522-06S1 (ATG)

Footnotes

This work was presented in part at ENDO 10, San Diego, CA.

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Disclaimer:

This publications was made possible, in part, by Grant UL1 RR024156 from the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and NIH Roadmap for Medical Research, Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of NCRR or NIH. Information on NCRR is available at the NCRR Website. Information on Re-engineering the Clinical Research Enterprise can be obtained from the NIH Roadmap website.

References

  • 1.Korth-Schutz A, Levine LS, New MI. Evidence for the adrenal source of androgens in precocious adenarche. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 1976;82:242–252. doi: 10.1530/acta.0.0820342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Diaz A, Bhandari S, Sison C, Vogiatzi M. Characteristics of children with premature pubarche in the New York Metropolitan Area. Horm Res. 2008;70:150–154. doi: 10.1159/000137661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Utriainen P, Jääskeläinen J, Romppanen J, Voutilainen R. Childhood metabolic syndrome and its components in premature adrenarche. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92:4282–5. doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-2412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ibáñez L, Potau N, Verdis R, Zampolli M, Terzi C, Gussinyé M, et al. Postpubertal outcome in girls diagnosed of premature pubarche during childhood: increased frequency of functional ovarian hyperandrogenism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1993;76:1599–1603. doi: 10.1210/jcem.76.6.8501168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tamori Y, Sakaue H, Kasuga M. RBP4, an unexpected adipokine. Nature Medicine. 2006;12:30–1. doi: 10.1038/nm0106-30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yang Q, Graham TE, Mody N, Preitner F, Peroni OD, Zabolotny JM, et al. Serum retinol-binding protein 4 contributes to insulin resistance in obesity and type 2 diabetes. Nature. 2005;436:356–62. doi: 10.1038/nature03711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Korenblat KM, Fabbrini E, Mohammed BS, Klein S. Liver, muscle and adipose tissue insulin action is directly related to intrahepatic triglyceride content in obese subjects. Gastoenterology. 2008;134:1369–75. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.01.07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Graham TE, Yang Q, Bluher M, Hammarstedt A, Ciaraldi TP, Henry RR, et al. Retinol-binding protein 4 and insulin resistance in lean, obese and diabetic subjects. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:2552–63. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa054862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Stefan N, Hennige AM, Staiger H, Machann J, Schick F, Schleicher E, et al. High circulating retinol-binding protein 4 is associated with elevated liver fat but not with total, subcutaneous, visceral, or intramyocellular fat in humans. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:1173–8. doi: 10.2337/dc06-2342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Broch M, Gómez JM, Auguet MT, Vilarrasa N, Pastor R, Elio I, Olona M, García-España A, Richart C. Association of retinol-binding protein-4 (RBP4) with lipid parameters in obese women. Obes Surg. 2010;20:1258–64. doi: 10.1007/s11695-010-0200-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lee D, Lee J, Im JA. Association of serum retinol binding protein 4 and insulin resistance in apparently healthy adolescents. Metab Clin Exper. 2007;56:327–31. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2006.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Aeberli I, Biebenger R, Lehmann R, L’Allemand D, Spinas GA, Zimmermann MB. Serum retinol-binding protein 4 concentration and its ratio to serum retinol are associated with obesity and metabolic syndrome components in children. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92:4359–65. doi: 10.1210/jc.2007-0468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chan T, Tsai Y, Chiu P, Chen Y, Lee C, Tsai E. Serum retinol-binding protein 4 levels in nonobese women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:869–73. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.10.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yildiz BO, Bozdag G, Otegan U, Harmanci A, Boynukalin K, Vutal Z, et al. Visfatin and retinol-binding protein 4 concentrations in lean, glucose-tolerant women with PCOS. Reprod BioMed Online. 2010;20:150–5. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.10.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kuczmarski RJ, Ogden CL, Grummer-Strawn LM, et al. CDC growth charts: United States. Adv Data. 2000;314:1–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Silfen ME, Manibo AM, McMahon DJ, Levine LS, Murphy AR, Oberfield SE. Comparison of simple measures of insulin sensitivity in young girls with premature adrenarche: the fasting glucose to insulin ratio may be a simple and useful measure. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:2863–8. doi: 10.1210/jcem.86.6.7537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia. 1985;28:412–9. doi: 10.1007/BF00280883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Avignon A, Boegner C, Mariano-Goulart D, Colette C, Monnier L. Assessment of insulin sensitivity from plasma insulin and glucose in the fasting or post oral glucose-load state. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1999;23:512–7. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0800864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Matsuda M, DeFronzo RA. Insulin sensitivity indices obtained from oral glucose tolerance testing: comparison with the euglycemic insulin clamp. Diabetes Care. 1999;22:1462–70. doi: 10.2337/diacare.22.9.1462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Le Floch JP, Escuyer P, Baudin E, Baudon D, Perlemuter L. Blood glucose area under the curve. Methodological aspects. Diabetes Care. 1990;13:172–5. doi: 10.2337/diacare.13.2.172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Goodman E, Graham TE, Dolan LM, Daniels SR, Goodman ER, Kahn BB. The relationship of retinol binding protein 4 to changes in insulin resistance and cardiometabolic risk in overweight black adolescents. J Pediatr. 2009;154:67–73.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.07.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yeste D, Vendrell J, Tomasini R, Gallart LL, Clemente M, Simón I, Albisu M, Gussinyé M, Audi L, Carrascosa A. Retinol-binding protein 4 levels in obese children and adolescents with glucose intolerance. Horm Res Paediatr. 2010;73:335–40. doi: 10.1159/000308165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Abdul-Ghani MA, Matsuda M, Balas B, DeFronzo RA. Muscle and liver insulin resistance indexes derived from the oral glucose tolerance test. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:89–94. doi: 10.2337/dc06-1519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kanaka-Gantenbein C, Margeli A, Pervanidou P, Sakka S, Mastorakos G, Chrousos GP, Papassotitiou I. Retinol binding protein-4 and lipocalin-2 in childhood and adolescent obesity: when children are not just “small adults. Clin Chem. 2008;54:1176–82. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2007.099002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Baglopal P, Graham TE, Kahn BB, Altomare A, Funanage V, George D. Reduction of elevated serum retinol binding protein in obese children by lifestyle intervention: association with subclinical inflammation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92:1971–4. doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-2712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES