Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2013 May 7;8(5):e62681. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062681

Sexual Dimorphism Floral MicroRNA Profiling and Target Gene Expression in Andromonoecious Poplar (Populus tomentosa)

Yuepeng Song 1,2, Kaifeng Ma 1,2, Dong Ci 1,2, Zhiyi Zhang 1,2, Deqiang Zhang 1,2,*
Editor: Rongling Wu3
PMCID: PMC3646847  PMID: 23667507

Abstract

Although the molecular basis of poplar sex-specific flower development remains largely unknown, increasing evidence indicates an essential role for microRNAs (miRNAs). The specific miRNA types and precise miRNA expression patterns in dioecious plant flower development remain unclear. Here, we used andromonoecious poplar, an exceptional model system, to eliminate the confounding effects of genetic background of dioecious plants. This system, combined with high-throughput sequencing and computational analysis, allowed us to characterize sex-specific miRNAomes from female and male flowers. Comparative miRNAome analysis combined with quantitative real-time PCR revealed the expression patterns of 27 miRNAs in poplar flower and showed that the targets of these miRNAs are involved in flower organogenesis, Ca2+ transport, phytohormone synthesis and metabolism, and DNA methylation. This paper describes a complex regulatory network consisting of these miRNAs expressed in sex-specific flower development in a dioecious plant. The conserved and novel miRNA locations were annotated in the Populus trichocarpa genome. Among these, miRNA Pto-F70 and 4 targets are located in the sex-determination regions of chromosome XIX. Furthermore, two novel miRNAs, Pto-F47 and Pto-F68, were shown for the first time to be regulatory factors in phytohormone interactions. To our knowledge, this report is the first systematic investigation of sex-specific flower-related miRNAs and their targets in poplar, and it deepens our understanding of the important regulatory functions of miRNAs in female and male flower development in this dioecious plant.

Introduction

The genus Populus encompasses approximately 100 species divided into 5 sections and many of these species are important components of terrestrial ecosystems or important cultivated trees for wood, pulp, paper, and possibly biofuels uses. As dioecious trees, the genus Populus provides opportunities to study perennial woody plant biology and plant sexual dimorphism [1]. Moreover, the high-quality, annotated genome sequence of P. trichocarpa provides a key genomics tool, enabling genome-wide regulatory analyses [1]. Sexual dimorphism is a widely studied phenomenon in dioecious plants and likely results from different modes of selection operating in males and females [2]. As dioecious trees, poplar floral development is sexual dimorphism. The poplar flower is composed of two whorls, including a reduced perianth cup surrounding either the stamens or carpels, which begin to develop in spring (early May in Shandong province) of the year before the spring in which they will open [3], [4]. Until late May or early June, structural development of the male inflorescence is virtually indistinguishable from development of the female inflorescence. After that, the flower morphology, bract morphology, and cell division patterns differ markedly between the sexes [5]. Pioneering experiments found that a series of genes involved in flowering pathways are differently expressed between female and male flowers [6], [7]. Although the molecular basis of poplar sex-specific flower development remains largely mysterious, increasing evidence suggests that miRNAs may play essential roles in this process.

In plants, there are two classes of endogenous small RNAs: small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) and microRNAs (miRNAs). Both classes, ranging from 20–24 nt, are short non-coding RNA molecules that negatively regulate gene expression at the transcriptional and/or post-transcriptional levels [8]. siRNAs are generated from double- stranded RNA. By contrast, miRNAs are transcribed from a long precursor molecule that folds back on itself to form a hairpin. Dicer-Like1 (DCL1) protein cleaves this precursor molecule, resulting in a miRNA:miRNA* complex, which separates into miRNA and miRNA* after transport to the cytoplasm [9]. In the cytoplasm, the miRNA is bound by ARGONAUTE proteins to form part of the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), which interacts with target mRNAs to cleave the RNA of target genes at the paired region [10]. Since the mature miRNA and its complementary target sequence have almost perfect complementarity, identifying a miRNA usually leads to the prediction and/or identification of its target. miRNAs have been shown to target genes during plant organ development, stress tolerance, phytohormone signaling, growth phase change, and disease resistance [11], [12].

miRNAs have been identified as regulators of flower development and other pathways. For example, in Arabidopsis, the miR164 family targets a subset of NAC transcription factors including CUP-SHAPED COTYLEDON1 (CUC1) and CUC2, which mediate organ boundary formation. Among these members, miRNA164c affects petal number in early flowers [13]. miRNA172 regulates APETALA2 (AP2) and several of its homologs that share two tandem AP2 DNA-binding domains and play an important role in regulating flower development [14][16]. In maize, TASSELSEED 4 (TS4) and the AP2 homolog indeterminate spikelet 1 are confirmed miRNA172 targets. In ts4 mutants, female organs develop in the male inflorescence. Moreover, branching is increased in ts4 mutants indicating a link between sex determination and meristem fate [17]. In tree species, the unknown functions of the majority of genes are still the greatest gap. miRNA studies provided a best chance for directing to identify functions for genes [18]. Small RNA libraries prepared from poplar leaves and vegetative buds have been analyzed by high-throughput sequencing, finding 48 Populus-specific miRNA families [19]. However, sex-specific miRNA differences between female and male flower organs remain unclear, partly because of the effects of different genetic backgrounds of dioecious plants. For this work, we first used andromonoecious poplar, an exceptional model system that has both male and hermaphrodite flowers on a single plant, to eliminate confounding effects of genetic background of dioecious plants (Figure S1). In this study, our aim is to screen sex-specific potential functional miRNAs in poplar floral tissue, investigate their defined expression patterns and demonstrate a possible functional network of sex-specific miRNAs in poplar flower organs.

Results

Small RNA Sequence Analyses

Two small RNA (sRNA) libraries were constructed from female (F) and male (M) flowers of andromonoecious P. tomentosa. A total of 58,517,150 (F) and 47,918,351 (M) raw reads were generated from these libraries, respectively, using the Solexa sequencing technology (Table 1). After removing contaminant reads, clean reads were obtained and screened against rRNA, tRNA, snRNA, snoRNA, and mRNA in the Rfam 9.1 and NCBI GenBank databases, resulting in 50,782,479 (F) and 42,837,470 (M) reads remaining for further analyses. Conserved miRNAs were identified by alignment to data in miRBase 19.0 with ±2 nt mismatch; a total of 4,789,550 (F) and 4,306,015 (M) reads that could form characteristic hairpin structures were identified. 4,459,932 (F) and 3,810,615 (M) unannotated unique sRNA sequences, which were further analyzed to predict novel miRNAs. The sequenced sRNAs were then mapped to the Populus genome, miRBase19.0, the NCBI GenBank database, and the Rfam database, and classified into six categories: rRNA, known miRNA (miRNAs in miRBase 19.0), exon, intron, repeat associated RNA, and unknown sRNA. More than 60% of the sequences were unknown sRNAs (Figure 1A). The majority of total sRNA reads were either 21 or 24 nt for both libraries (Figure 1B). In female flower libraries, the 21-nt sRNAs were the most abundant, making up 41.4% of total sequence reads. The 24-nt sRNAs were the second most abundant class at 17.3% of total sequence reads. In male flower libraries, the 21 and 24 nt sRNAs were not significantly different, making up 29.9% and 29.7%, respectively.

Table 1. Summary of small RNA sequences from P. tomentosa female and male flower.

Female library (F) Male library (M)
Raw reads 58,517,150 47,918,351
Clean reads 50,782,479 42,837,470
Annotated sRNAs 16,625,919 16,030,471
Un-annotated sRNAs 34,156,560 26,806,999
Small RNAs 4,789,550 4,306,015
Annotated sRNAs 329,618 495,400
Un-annotated sRNAs 4,459,932 3,810,615

Figure 1. Small RNAs from female and male flower libraries in andromonoecious poplar.

Figure 1

(A) Distribution of unique sRNA annotation categories. (B) Size distribution of small RNA reads.

Conserved miRNAs in Andromonoecious P. tomentosa

To date, 46 conserved and non-conserved miRNA families have been discovered in the Populus genome [20]. In the two libraries sequenced in our study, 134 unique miRNA sequences were identified belonging to 38 conserved miRNA families (Table 2). The expression levels of a few miRNA families, such as miR166 and miR472, were extraordinarily high in both libraries (Table 2). miR166 was the most abundant, with 2,157,665 (F) and 142, 916 (M) reads accounting for 62.5% and 47.1% of all conserved miRNA reads, respectively. Several miRNA families, such as miR156, miR159, miR169, miR319, miR396, and miR1447, had moderate expression levels (Table 2). By contrast, some miRNA families showed very low levels of expression, with fewer than 200 reads. Different members in the same miRNA family displayed drastically different expression levels. For example, miR166 members varied in abundance from 695 to 2,157,665 reads. Also, 38 unique miRNA sequences belonging to 38 conserved miRNA families were produced from 134 loci (Table S1). Of these miRNA sequences, 11 were encoded by a single locus in the Populus genome, whereas the other 27 sequences had multiple loci. Most of these had 2–6 loci in the genome, and only a few had more than eight loci. For example, Pto-miR166a–l and Pto-miR169a–m had 12 and 13 loci, respectively. Thus, the size of miRNA families varies in andromonoecious P. tomentosa. Among these conserved miRNAs, miR6459 was only expressed in the female library. By contrast, two miRNAs, miRNA397 and miRNA6462, were detected as having male-specific expression (Figure 2).

Table 2. Summary of conserved miRNAs found in andromonoecious P. tomentosa.

miRNAfamily Members Reads Ratios (female/male)
Female Male
miR156 6 3629 8330 0.44
miR159 3 808474 20798 38.87
miR160 4 2695 523 5.15
miR162 2 5094 342 14.89
miR166 12 2157665 142916 15.10
miR167 8 1995 15568 0.13
miR168 2 38333 5129 7.47
miR169 13 41555 3514 11.83
miR171 5 820 298 2.75
miR172 2 58 105 0.55
miR319 6 115137 2239 51.42
miR393 5 2498 1911 1.31
miR394 2 4814 1143 4.21
miR396 9 30598 30786 0.99
miR397 1 0 8 0.00
miR398 3 1783 752 2.37
miR399 10 11180 116 96.38
miR403 3 19815 5087 3.90
miR408 1 157 161 0.98
miR472 2 126848 48300 2.63
miR475 7 1524 394 3.87
miR476 3 1101 637 1.73
miR482 2 1973 312 6.32
miR530 1 337 11 30.64
miR1444 1 29 36 0.81
miR1446 4 22 51 0.43
miR1447 1 22381 2700 8.29
miR1448 1 16637 4935 3.37
miR1450 1 16340 826 19.78
miR6421 1 641 711 0.90
miR6425 4 219 245 0.89
miR6427 1 345 112 3.08
miR6433 2 1026 374 2.74
miR6445 2 9334 3382 2.76
miR6447 1 2 10 0.20
miR6459 1 603 0 0.00
miR6462 1 0 5 0.00
miR6478 1 1846 1028 1.80
Total 134 3447508 303795 11.35

Figure 2. Summary of common and specific sequences between female and male libraries. (A) Conserved sRNAs and (B) Novel sRNAs.

Figure 2

Identification of Novel miRNAs in Andromonoecious P. tomentosa

The characteristic hairpin structure of miRNA precursors was used to predict novel miRNAs. In total, 78 unique sRNA sequences were identified including 8 sRNAs with complementary miRNA*s (Table 3, 4 and 5). The majority of these novel miRNA candidates had lengths of 21 and 22 nt, and started with a 5′ U (Figure 3). The 78 sRNA sequences were transcribed from 85 loci; most were only produced from one locus, but Pto-F2, Pto-F13, Pto-F31 and Pto-F31 were each generated from 3 loci. The length of the predicted novel miRNA precursors ranged from 76 to 303 nt, with an average of 140 nt. The average minimum free energy (MFE) value was −55.58 kcal/mol, with a range of −21.2 to −177.4 kcal/mol. The structures of the 78 novel miRNA precursors are shown in Figure S2. Most of them showed differential expression in the two libraries. For instance, the mature miRNA counts ranged from 63 to 8,480,860. Among those 78 miRNAs, only 6 sRNAs were found both in female and male libraries. 61 female-specific sRNAs and 11 male-specific sRNAs were detected, suggesting that more kinds of sRNA are involved in female floral development than in male development. To investigate whether these novel miRNA sequences were conserved across plant species, we used them as query sequences to perform BLASTN searches against the Arabidopsis thaliana, Brassica rapa, Citrus sinensis, Medicago truncatula, Oryza sativa, Ricinus communis, Prunus persica, Vitis vinifera and Zea mays genome databases in Phytozome v7.0. A large proportion of the novel sRNAs identified in andromonoecious P. tomentosa did not have perfect matches in different genome databases. Only 6 male-specific sRNA and 5 female-specific sRNAs were detected in other species (Table S2).

Table 3. Summary of common novel miRNAs in female and male flower libraries.

Name Sequence (5′-3′) LP MFE miRNA location miRNA reads Ratio(Female/Male) miR*reads
Female Male
Pto-F1 ATAGGTTTCCGATCATTCCTCC 169 −81.7 chr13∶103779–103800 8990 391 22.99 NO
Pto-F2a TGAAATGCCATGAACAACGATC 125 −53.4 chr13∶11993451–11993472 433 8111 0.05 NO
Pto-F2b TGAAATGCCATGAACAACGATC 115 −47 chr16∶4142967–4142987 377 942 0.40 NO
Pto-F3 ATGTAATCAAGGCTGCTAGTC 141 −72.3 chr17∶8682859–8682879 71 434 0.16 Yes
Pto-F4 TCTAAAGATCCGGCGGTCGGC 124 −44 chr18∶2804698–2804718 63 90 0.70 NO
Pto-F5 TATGTTTGACAGAAACCCCCT 171 −89.2 chr18∶8350113–8350132 729 1991 0.37 NO
Pto-F6 TGTGGTAGATATGTGAGGATT 148 −65.2 chr19∶10983127–10983147 472 233 2.03 NO

Table 4. Summary of male-specific novel miRNAs.

Name Sequence (5-3) LP MFE miRNA location miRNA reads miR*reads
Pto-F7 CTCAAACTTTTCTCTTACTTC 283 −168.1 chr2∶1282971–1282991 147 NO
Pto-F8 TACCGTTAGAAAGATCTCAAC 179 −62 chr2∶8266846–8266866 126 NO
Pto-F9 ATAGGTTTCCGATCATTCCTCC 199 −85.04 chr5∶119707–119728 819 YES
Pto-F10 TTTTGCACGTAGAATTCAGGA 139 −38 chr5∶18398105–18398125 147 NO
Pto-F11 ACGAGCCATCATAACTGTAGG 125 −81.92 chr6∶6767480–6767500 714 YES
Pto-F12 TAGTTCGAGGGACCAAAATCA 219 −111.4 chr6∶8063061–8063081 357 YES
Pto-F13 ATCTGCTTTCTGCGACTCCTC 183 −68.8 chr8∶8028138–8028158 126 NO
Pto-F14 GCATTTGGACGTCGGGGAACT 90 −23.7 chr9∶7157296–7157316 357 NO
Pto-F15a AGGATTGGAGGGAATTAAACA 135 −40.55 chr10∶20020250–20020270 105 NO
Pto-F15b AGGATTGGAGGGAATTAAACA 129 −41.7 chr12∶11845073–11845093 105 NO
Pto-F16 TAATTCCATGACTGTGTACAG 156 −37.82 chr15∶10265155–10265175 189 NO
Pto-F17a TTTAATTTCCTCCAATATCTTA 133 −45.54 chr18∶14578403–14578424 210 NO
Pto-F17b TTTAATTTCCTCCAATATCTTA 136 −45.54 scaffold_269∶8974–8995 210 NO
Pto-F17c TTTAGTTTCCTCCAATATCTTA 136 −41.2 scaffold_269∶9454–9475 189 NO

Table 5. Summary of female-specific novel miRNAs.

Name Sequence (5-3) LP MFE miRNA location miRNA reads miR*reads
Pto-F18 TTGGTTAAACTCCCATCAGGA 133 −65.6 chr1∶7117690–7117710 126 NO
Pto-F19 CTCAGATTAGCCAGGTGCCT 117 −44.3 chr1∶10983482–10983501 105 NO
Pto-F20 TTATTAAACCCGGACCGGCCT 122 −54.62 chr1∶18312617–18312637 126 NO
Pto-F21 TACCCGGTTACTGTGCATGTGC 76 −33.3 chr1∶38996098–38996119 126 NO
Pto-F22 TATCCTTGGATCTGACGACCA 220 −123.4 chr1∶39819960–39819980 294 NO
Pto-F23 TTTTCGATCCAAGCTTCGGGT 80 −27.1 chr1∶42987729–42987749 105 NO
Pto-F24 TTACTTCCTTTTGTCCCTCTC 303 −177.4 chr2∶1282957–1282977 357 NO
Pto-F25 TATAGATTGCAGAGGGAACC 203 −71.04 chr2∶12233873–12233892 126 NO
Pto-F26 TTATTAAACCCGGACCGGCCT 78 −42.8 chr2∶19952785–19952805 126 NO
Pto-F27 TCCGAGCTCTAATTATGTGGG 182 −92 chr2∶21648214–21648234 798 NO
Pto-F28 TTGGGCTGGCAGTTGTGATGAC 161 −45.87 chr3∶19076220–19076241 231 NO
Pto-F29 TTCCGGTTTTTGGGACTCCGAT 103 −35.1 chr4∶20319258–20319279 105 NO
Pto-F30 TTCTTTCCTATCAAACTTCAAC 191 −92.4 chr4∶22210258–22210279 105 NO
Pto-F31 TGAAGATAAGAGCTTGTTTGG 169 −75.86 chr5∶6548077–6548097 651 NO
Pto-F32 TTTGCACGTAGAATTCAGGATT 139 −38 chr5∶18398103–18398124 588 NO
Pto-F33 ATGGATTGATGAAGATGAGGA 92 −26.3 chr5∶21111319–21111339 105 NO
Pto-F34 TTATTTCCTCAAACTTTCCTC 256 −159.8 chr5∶24262419–24262439 273 NO
Pto-F35 TAGAACCTGACCAGTTGAGCT 116 −30 chr6∶2313141–2313161 105 NO
Pto-F36 TGGCCCATGATCTTCATTGTG 115 −78.02 chr6∶6767559–6767579 357 YES
Pto-F37 TTTTTGTTGTTTAAGAACCCT 301 −128.6 chr6∶21307737–21307757 315 NO
Pto-F38 TTGGGCTGGCAGTTGTGATGAC 161 −46.2 chr7∶301518–301539 231 NO
Pto-F39 TGTGGGACTCGAATTAGTGAT 96 −26.43 chr7∶13307862–13307882 147 NO
Pto-F40a GAGGAGGGAGAGAGATCTGT 136 −38.3 chr8∶5498368–5498387 126 NO
Pto-F40b GAGGAGGGAGAGAGATCTGT 114 −34.3 chr8∶5522852–5522871 126 NO
Pto-F41 ATCCAACGGTTAGATCTCCCT 296 −162.7 chr8∶8443078–8443098 105 NO
Pto-F42 CTTGAAACAATGTTTGGTGCAG 121 −31.9 chr8∶10699331–10699352 105 NO
Pto-F43 TAGAGTATAAGAGGATCGACT 124 −32.4 chr8∶15869891–15869911 147 NO
Pto-F44 ACTTTGACCTGAACTTGCCC 79 −40 chr9∶8255922–8255941 105 NO
Pto-F45 TGTCCTGACTCGAACTCGAGA 82 −21.2 chr10∶7102937–7102957 189 NO
Pto-F46 TGAAGATAAGAGCTTGTTTGG 169 −77.06 chr10∶7227906–7227926 651 NO
Pto-F47 GGGACTGCTGTAGATGCTTGG 90 −34.7 chr10∶13462743–13462763 105 NO
Pto-F48 TTGATGACTGATCTTGAGCAT 99 −62.8 chr10∶16376128–16376148 189 YES
Pto-F49 TTGTAAGAGCCTGAGACAGCC 143 −51.8 chr10∶18334850–18334870 714 NO
Pto-F50 TTTAATTTCCTCCAATATCTCA 169 −45.91 chr10∶20020296–20020317 399 NO
Pto-F51 TTGGAATCCTCTCTGATAATGC 105 −30.5 chr10∶20322598–20322619 105 NO
Pto-F52 TTTAGGACCCGTGGGATTAGTC 102 −27 chr11∶8039096–8039117 189 NO
Pto-F53 TCAATGGGTAAAAATTCTGACC 96 −24.4 chr12∶3834076–3834097 126 NO
Pto-F54 TTGGAGCTCGAGACTTGGCAC 90 −25.74 chr13∶1347925–1347945 105 NO
Pto-F55 ATCACTGTGTCTATTAGGATGG 82 −28.1 chr13∶6333415–6333436 105 NO
Pto-F56 TGCTAGGACCAAGTTTTCTGG 103 −53.34 chr13∶9970875–9970895 609 YES
Pto-F57 TTCAGGACCTGTAGAATTAGTC 92 −24.2 chr13∶12124499–12124520 105 NO
Pto-F58a TGAATGGCTGTTGAACTTGGC 156 −49.5 chr14∶293794–293814 168 NO
Pto-F58b TGAATGGCTGTTGAACTTGGC 158 −45.51 chr14∶726835–726855 168 NO
Pto-F58c TGAATGGCTGTTGAACTTGGC 158 −52.6 chr14∶1080042–1080062 168 NO
Pto-F59 TGATGGGTCTCATTTAGTAGA 215 −86.36 chr14∶5877228–5877248 441 NO
Pto-F60 AACCGAACCGAACTGAACCGA 98 −33.4 chr14∶16267732–16267752 105 NO
Pto-F61 TTATAGTTTTGAAATCCGGCC 95 −47.2 chr15∶5715046–5715066 147 NO
Pto-F62 AACCCAAGAACTCAACTCTGT 171 −68.37 chr15∶6997081–6997101 126 NO
Pto-F63 GTACGATCCTATAGAACAGAT 116 −34.5 chr15∶15015652–15015672 189 YES
Pto-F64 CAACACCAGACCCAAGAGCTT 117 −44.51 chr16∶5544896–5544916 210 NO
Pto-F65 TTAGGGTTTAGGGTTTAGAA 157 −41.6 chr17∶210550–210569 126 NO
Pto-F66 TCGAGATTGTACTGTTCATA 77 −23.6 chr17∶4120360–4120379 105 NO
Pto-F67 TGGCAAATGATCTGCATCTGC 90 −24.52 chr17∶13666346–13666366 105 NO
Pto-F68 GTGGGTGGGTCTGGGTGGCA 118 −47.7 chr18∶10507789–10507808 147 NO
Pto-F69 TTTGCTCTTCGTTTTCTCATG 170 −77.8 chr18∶14336738–14336758 294 NO
Pto-F70 TTTTATTCCTGACTCTGGCATC 166 −43.31 chr19∶907650–907671 126 NO
Pto-F71 TTGGGAATTATTACAATGGCA 106 −31.8 chr19∶1460855–1460875 147 NO
Pto-F72 TTATTAAACCCGGACCGGCCT 87 −39.6 chr19∶2013039–2013059 126 NO
Pto-F73 TGTTTTCCGGAAAGTAGTTTC 99 −27.1 chr19∶8890465–8890485 378 NO
Pto-F74 TAGGGCAGAGAATTGAATGACT 119 −45.4 chr19∶10646670–10646691 252 NO
Pto-F75 TCGAGATTTCTTTGTTGGAGCT 125 −42.72 scaffold_1233∶2309–2330 126 NO
Pto-F76 TCGGCGTTGATGTAGAATGGC 153 −53.1 scaffold_401∶10122–10142 126 NO
Pto-F77 TTTTGAGACAATGCTGAAAAT 99 −28.4 scaffold_65∶42511–42531 1953 NO
Pto-F78 ACATGAAACGGCGTCGTTTTG 91 −26 scaffold_76∶39681–39701 126 NO

Figure 3. First nucleotide bias of novel candidate miRNAs in andromonoecious poplar female and male flower libraries.

Figure 3

Novel miRNA and Targets were Located in Gender Determination Regions

It was reported that Chromosome XIX is an incipient sex chromosome in Populus [21], [22]. In the present study, 5 novel miRNAs located in chromosome XIX were identified, including Pto-F6, Pto-F70, Pto-F71, Pto-F72 and Pto-F73 (Table 6; Figure 4A). Pto-F6 was expressed both in female and male flower libraries, but expressed at higher levels in female flowers than in male (Table 3). The Pto-70, Pto-71, Pto-72 and Pto-73 female-specific miRNAs were weakly expressed in female flowers (Table 5). A total of 33 targets located on chromosome XIX were identified for these novel miRNAs. Among these, Pto-F6 and Pto-73 were predicted to match 14 targets respectively that are located on chromosome XIX (Table 6). By contrast, no targets were identified for Pto-F72. Putative functions of these targets genes were annotated by BLAST searches against the TAIR, NCBI and JGI protein datasets. The results revealed that target genes are involved in disease resistance, response to auxin stimulus, decreased DNA methylation and membrane transport. Yin et al (2008) indicated that a 2.45 Mb segment in the peritelomeric region of chromosome XIX and is associated with gender determination [21]. In our study, Pto-70 and 4 targets genes were found in sex-determination regions (Figure 4B). Among the 4 target genes, 3 targets were predicted to match Pto-73 miRNAs and one was predicted to match Pto-F6 miRNA.

Table 6. Targets of novel P. tomentosa miRNAs verified in XIX chromosome of poplar.

miRNA Target Gene Modela Putative functionb Location TAIR Gene Modelc
Pto-F6 POPTR_0019s00970 negative regulation of catalytic activity, proteolysis, Chr19∶737356–739497 AT1G04110
POPTR_0019s01610 response to auxin stimulus Chr19∶1429616–1430026 AT5G53590
POPTR_0019s02760 protein phosphorylation Chr19∶2561092–2568350 AT1G53430
POPTR_0019s02880 Pentatricopeptide repeat Chr19∶2750320–2751951 AT2G34400
POPTR_0019s03110 Encodes a lipid acyl hydrolase with wide substrate specificity Chr19∶3122643–3124999 AT2G26560
POPTR_0019s03700 NB-ARC domain-containing disease resistance protein Chr19∶3775544–3779105 AT4G27220
POPTR_0019s03970 NB-ARC domain-containing disease resistance protein Chr19∶4034540–4038218 AT4G27220
POPTR_0019s06080 KAR-UP F-box 1 (KUF1); CONTAINS InterPro DOMAIN/s Chr19∶6589704–6590843 AT1G31350
POPTR_0019s10290 LRR and NB-ARC domains-containing disease resistance protein Chr19∶11867256–1870843 AT3G14460
POPTR_0019s10300 LRR and NB-ARC domains-containing disease resistance protein Chr19∶11884201–11888700 AT3G14460
POPTR_0019s10890 similar to expression supported by MPSS Chr19∶12374345–12375027 AT1G35430
POPTR_0019s12450 similar to chloroplast precursor (TRX-M1) Chr19∶13509839–13510150 AT4G03520
POPTR_0019s13380 Chr19∶14290118–14294196 AT5G08415
POPTR_0019s15030 similar to decreased DNA methylation 1 Chr19∶15655586–15661763 AT5G66750
Pto-F70 POPTR_0019s02280 member of Myosin-like proteins Chr19∶2112309–2122774 AT1G54560
POPTR_0019s10800 Encodes a cyclase Chr19∶12293003–122983961 AT1G78955
POPTR_0019s15290 unknown protein Chr19∶15825895–15830273 AT5G01970
Pto-F71 POPTR_0019s03120 Encodes a lipid acyl hydrolase with wide substrate specificity Chr19∶3134481–3137841 AT2G26560
POPTR_0019s08530 ATP phosphoribosyl transferase Chr19∶10043845–10045971 AT1G09795
Pto-F73 POPTR_0019s00820 ENTH/VHS/GAT family protein Chr19∶545449–549077 AT5G63640
POPTR_0019s01010 NB-ARC domain-containing disease resistance protein Chr19∶774829–779781 AT4G27220
POPTR_0019s01080 NB-ARC domain-containing disease resistance protein Chr19∶820958–823839 AT4G27220
POPTR_0019s02030 Chr19∶1889627–1891189
POPTR_0019s02060 LRR and NB-ARC domains-containing disease resistance protein Chr19∶1922498–1924769 AT4G10780
POPTR_0019s02180 NB-ARC domain-containing disease resistance protein Chr19∶2029692–2032970 AT4G27220
POPTR_0019s02200 Disease resistance protein (CC-NBS-LRR class) family Chr19∶2058206–2062218 AT1G12290
POPTR_0019s02410 Chr19∶2215592–2216219
POPTR_0019s03080 NB-ARC domain-containing disease resistance protein Chr19∶3094719–3100126 AT4G27220
POPTR_0019s03480 similar to phosphoenolpyruvate-carboxylase kinase Chr19∶3561751–3563659 AT3G04530
POPTR_0019s03800 similar to SNF2 domain-containing protein Chr19∶3871132–3874229 AT1G08600
POPTR_0019s05300 similar to putative disease resistance gene analog NBS-LRR. Chr19∶5594198–5607481 AT4G27190
POPTR_0019s05990 integral membrane transporter family protein Chr19∶6422952–6425657 AT1G64890
POPTR_0019s12230 similar to GTP-binding protein Chr19∶13325801–13327862 AT5G60860

Target Gene Modela and Putative functionb were derived from Joint Genome Institute (JGI: http://www.jgi.doe.gov/) and (TAIR : http://www.arabidopsis.org).

TAIR Gene Modelc were derived from TAIR (TAIR : http://www.arabidopsis.org).

Figure 4. Distribution of novel miRNAs on chromosome XIX.

Figure 4

A. 6 novel miRNAs and their targets located on chromosome XIX. B. Schematic diagram of the order of 6 novel miRNAs and their targets on chromosome XIX. Each miRNA and corresponding targets are marked the same color. Putative sex determination region in a 2.45-Mb region at the peritelomeric end of chromosome XIX, based on Yin et al (2008).

Target Prediction for Pto-miR156, Pto-miR159, Pto-miR172 and Pto-miR319 and Novel miRNAs in Andromonoecious P. tomentosa

To understand the functions of sex-specific flower development related miRNAs, the first step is to predict and experimentally validate their targets. Consequently, we predicted 25 target genes for Pto-miR156, Pto-miR159, Pto-miR172 and Pto-miR319 that were different from the previously defined Populus miRNA targets (miRBase 19.0), and a total of 464 targets were identified for the 78 novel miRNAs (Table S3). The number of predicted targets varied from 1 to 15 per miRNA. The categorization of female and male-specific miRNA target genes according to biological process is shown in Figure 5. After putative functional annotation by BLAST searches against the TAIR, NCBI and JGI protein datasets, all targets of female and male-specific miRNAs that had a greater than twofold difference in expression between the sexes (Ratio≧2or≦0.5) were identified as candidate genes for gene functional enrichment analysis. All the target genes between the sexes were functionally characterized using enrichment analysis of gene sets, mostly as described by Gene Ontology terms (Figure 5). GO analysis showed that response to hormone stimulus, negative regulation of gene expression, regulation of flower development, and organ formation were significantly enriched terms for biological processes.

Figure 5. AgriGO analysis of target genes for statistically enriched GO terms in the ‘Biological process’ ontology.

Figure 5

Coloring of GO term nodes is proportional to their significance as indicated by the scale.

Expression Profiling of miRNAs and Targets in Andromonoecious P. tomentosa

Andromonoecious poplar, an exceptional model system, eliminates confounding effects of genetic background of dioecious plants and thus is a powerful system in which to identify accurate sex-specific factors related to flower development. Therefore, the comparison of the small RNA profiles of female and male flowers of andromonoecious poplar was informative for characterization of functional miRNAs involved in sex-specific flower development. We sequenced 134 conserved miRNA sequences and 78 predicted novel miRNA sequences. 70.1% (94/134) of conserved miRNA sequences were up-regulated in female flower, and only 40 conserved miRNAs were up-regulated in male flower. A total of 104 conserved and 2 novel miRNAs were verified as differentially expressed by greater than two-fold between the two libraries (ratio >2 or <0.5 and p<0.01), including 94 conserved and 2 novel miRNAs that were up-regulated in female flower and 37 conserved and 4 novel miRNAs that were up-regulated in male flower (Table 2 and 3). Moreover, 3 conserved miRNAs (miRNA 397, miRNA 6459 and miRNA6462) and 72 novel miRNAs, including 11 male-specific and 61 female-specific, were expressed in a sex-specific manner (Table 4 and 5). To examine the detailed expression pattern of these potential miRNAs in andromonoecious poplar flowers, the 27 differentially expressed miRNAs, including four conserved and 23 novel miRNAs, were verified by real-time quantitative PCR (Figure 6A). Overall, comparisons of these data correspond to the deep sequencing results, indicating that the miRNA expression levels determined by high-throughput sequencing are reliable.

Figure 6. Pearson correlation Coefficient (PCC) heat map representing expression of miRNAs and their targets in andromonoecious poplar flower organs.

Figure 6

Red and yellow indicate higher levels of transcriot and green and blue indicate lower levels of transcript. The names of samples are shown at the top. The gene model and gene annotation are shown on the right side. A: Heatmap of conserved and novel miRNAs. B: Heatmap of target genes.

Base on the results of gene enrichment analysis, 31 putative target genes were selected as candidate genes for gene expression analysis (Table 7 and Figure 6B). The expression of miRNA target genes was detected using real-time quantitative PCR. For most target genes, expression was negatively correlated with the levels of a given miRNA, which is in accordance with the gene silencing function of miRNAs. It should be noted that expression of CONSTANS-LIKE 6 (COL6), the target of PtoF25, was not correlated with the abundance of PtoF25 (Figure 6B), indicating that COL6 expression might be regulated by other mechanisms.

Table 7. Candidate targets of novel and conserved miRNAs in andromonoecious P. tomentosa.

miRNA Cleave sites Target Gene Modela Putative functionb Accession number TAIR Gene Model
miRNA167 392 POPTR_0013s00750 similar to MAINTENANCE OF METHYLATION KC477290 AT5G66750
Pto-F6 235 POPTR_0005s14640 similar to gibberellin-responsive protein 5 KC477281 AT3G02380
Pto-F6 305 POPTR_0004s18020 similar to myb family transcription factor (MYB4); KC477284 AT1G74670
Pto-F6 394 POPTR_0019s15030 similar to DECREASED DNA METHYLATION 1 KC297686 AT1G08060
Pto-F7 193 POPTR_0004s10800 similar to CONSTANS-like protein CO2. KC477292 AT4G38620
Pto-F11 228 POPTR_0012s03530 similar to EARLY-PHYTOCHROME-RESPONSIVE1; KC477285 AT1G18330
Pto-F14 336 POPTR_0010s13870 similar to PHYTOCHROME AND FLOWERING TIME 1 KC477286 AT3G60460
Pto-F16 310 POPTR_0015s07740 calcium-dependent protein kinase family protein KC477266 AT1G68520
Pto-F19 548 POPTR_0002s02970 similar to Zinc finger protein CONSTANS-LIKE 6 KC477293 AT1G25540
Pto-F19 270 POPTR_0014s05370 similar to myb family transcription factor KC297692 AT1G75540
Pto-F25 139 POPTR_0010s13490 similar to Zinc finger protein CONSTANS-LIKE 6 KC477294 AT1G19870
Pto-F28 293 POPTR_0002s02680 calmodulin-binding family protein KC477283 AT4G36920
Pto-F36 283 POPTR_0005s18400 similar to APETAL2-like protein KC477268 AT3G10300
Pto-F45 481 POPTR_0006s04590 calcium-binding EF hand family protein KC477282 AT3G15210
Pto-F47 125 POPTR_0001s40770 similar to Ethylene responsive element binding factor 4 KC477274 AT4G34760
Pto-F47 99 POPTR_0004s17150 similar to auxin-responsive protein KC477279 AT4G36920
Pto-F51 815 POPTR_0007s10780 similar to APETAL2-like protein KC477295 AT3G16990
Pto-F54 224 POPTR_0008s10610 similar to seed maturation protein PM36 KC477289 AT1G74740
Pto-F54 180 POPTR_0001s16100 similar to UNUSUAL FLORAL ORGANS protein KC477287 AT1G30950
Pto-F55 321 POPTR_0007s08330 similar to ABA DEFICIENT 3 KC477272 AT5G66750
Pto-F56 513 POPTR_0010s11350 similar to CYTOKININ RESPONSE 1 KC477269 AT2G01830
Pto-F56 167 POPTR_0007s12710 similar to DECREASED DNA METHYLATION 1 KC477291 AT1G16540
Pto-F58a 311 POPTR_0008s13720 similar to CYTOKININ RESPONSE 1 KC477270 AT2G01830
Pto-F64 168 POPTR_0018s06080 similar to ethylene-responsive transcriptional coactivator KC477275 AT3G24500
Pto-F65 152 POPTR_0002s25330 similar to ABA insensitive 3 KC477273 AT3G02380
Pto-F66 71 POPTR_0004s10800 similar to CONSTANS-like protein 1 KC477292 AT3G24650
Pto-F66 187 POPTR_0017s14410 similar to CONSTANS-like protein 1 KC477267 AT5G43700
Pto-F68 253 POPTR_0012s04470 similar to Auxin efflux carrier component 1 KC477277 AT3G02380
Pto-F68 166 POPTR_0005s05550 similar to Auxin-induced protein IAA4 KC477278 AT1G73590
Pto-F68 89 POPTR_0008s10100 similar to gibberellin 2-oxidase KC477280 AT1G47990
Pto-F73 421 POPTR_0013s01640 dormancy/auxin associated family protein KC477276 AT5G21482
Pto-F76 221 POPTR_0006s23760 similar to cytokinin oxidase; similar to putative (CKX5) KC477271 AT1G56220

Target Gene Modela and Putative functionb were derived from Joint Genome Institute (JGI: http://www.jgi.doe.gov/) and (TAIR : http://www.arabidopsis.org).

A Possible Functional Network of Sex-specific Flower Development Related miRNAs in Andromonoecious P. tomentosa

The idea that miRNAs could play important roles in flower development has been suggested in previous studies. However, no systematic investigation has been conducted into how flower development may be regulated via miRNA-mediated processes. In the present study, a possible functional network, which connects flower development related miRNAs with their targets were first reported (Table 7 and Figure 7). Base on the gene functional annotation, all target genes were divided into four subgroups as shown in Figure 7.

Figure 7. A possible functional network of flower development related miRNAs in andromonoecious P. tomentosa.

Figure 7

Black line represent repression of target gene expression.

The first subgroup related to floral development was regulated by 9 miRNAs including Pto-F6, Pto-F11, Pto-F14, Pto-F19, Pto-25, Pto-36, Pto-F51, Pto-F54 and Pto-F66. Four members of the CONSTANS-LIKE gene family were negatively regulated by three female-specific miRNAs including Pto-F19, Pto-F25 and Pto-F66. Of these, Pto-F66 was found to target 2 members of the CONSTANS-LIKE2 gene family. Also, EARLY-PHYTOCHROME-RESPONSIVE1 (EPR1) and PHYTOCHROME AND FLOWERING TIME 1 (PFT1) were negatively regulated by two male-specific miRNAs, Pto-F11 and Pto-F14, respectively. In our study, we detected two novel miRNAs, Pto-F36 and Pto-51, targeting APETALA 2 (AP2). Female flower specific Pto-F54 was found to target two genes, UNUSUAL FLORAL ORGANS (UFO) and SEED MATURATION PROTEIN (PM36).

Three miRNAs are involved in regulation of the second subgroup, genes that relate to Ca2+ transport. Two female flower specific miRNAs, Pto-F28 and Pto-F45, were found to be negative factors for the expression of CALMODULIN-BINDING FAMILY PROTEIN and CALCIUM-BINDING EF HAND FAMILY PROTEIN. By contrast, CALCIUM-DEPENDENT PROTEIN KINASE FAMILY PROTEIN (CDPK) gene expression was repressed by Pto-F16, a male-specific miRNA.

In the third subgroup, there were 10 miRNAs involved in hormone related gene regulation. All of these miRNAs were female flower specific, except Pto-F6, which had expression significantly higher in female flower than in male. Pto-F68 has three target genes, including AUXIN EFFLUX CARRIER COMPONENT 1, AUXIN-INDUCED PROTEIN (IAA4) and GIBBERELLIN 2-OXIDASE. By contrast, ETHYLENE RESPONSIVE ELEMENT BINDING FACTOR 4 (EREBF4) and AUXIN-RESPONSIVE PROTEIN (SAUR29) were targeted by the same novel miRNA, Pto-F47. Two genes related to ABA, ABA DEFICIENT 3 (ABA3) and ABA INSENSITIVE 3 (ABI3), were targeted by female flower specific miRNAs Pto-F55 and Pto-F65, respectively.

In the last subgroup, genes that relate to DNA methylation were regulated by 3 miRNAs. MAINTENANCE OF METHYLATION1 (MET1) was negatively regulated by miRNA167, which had expression significant higher in male flower than in female. By contrast, two members of DECREASED DNA METHYLATION 1 (DDM1) were negatively regulated by Pto-F6, which had higher expression in female flower and by female flower specific Pto-F56, respectively.

Discussion

Overview of the Deep Sequencing Datasets

Although an increasing number of studies about miRNAs and their expression patterns from different tissues have been reported, there are still few studies on sex-specific miRNAs between female and male flowers of poplar. In this study, andromonoecious poplar, an exceptional model system, was used to eliminate confounding effects of genetic background of dioecious plants. We generated sRNA libraries from female and male flower of andromonoecious poplar and obtained over 40 million reads of 18–30 nt per library, substantially increasing the available data on poplar flower sRNAs [23], [24]. Mapping analysis of unique sRNAs revealed that over 60% of the identified sRNAs were previously unknown, suggesting that even more sRNAs remain to be identified. The size distribution of small RNAs indicated that the numbers of 21-nt sRNAs were significantly higher than 24-nt sRNAs in female flower, suggesting that female flower development may require more sRNAs in this size class. By contrast, the numbers of 21-nt sRNAs and 24-nt sRNAs were not significantly different in male flower libraries. The 24-nt sRNAs mainly comprised siRNAs associated with repeats and transposons [25], [26]. 24-nt sRNA numbers in male flower were significantly higher than in female, suggesting that a number of siRNAs related to repeats and transposons are involved in male flower development.

Conserved miRNAs Expressed in Flower

We detected dramatically different expression levels among different members of the same miRNA family, suggesting that expression of conserved miRNAs varies in andromonoecious P. tomentosa. These conserved miRNAs have been identified in multiple flowering pathways. For example, three miRNA families (miR172, miR159/miR319 and miR156) are involved in flowering-time regulation [27]. In this study, miRNA159 and miRNA319 expression in female flower was 38.8-fold and 51.42-fold higher, respectively, than in male flower. miRNA172 was weakly expressed in female and male flower, with no significant difference. By contrast, miRNA156 was expressed in male flower at higher levels than in female flower. This result suggested that different miRNAs are involved in female and male flowering time regulation. miRNA159 and miRNA319 also have been reported to act with miRNA164 and miRNA167 in specifying particular cell types during the later stages of flower development [28]. The present study revealed that miRNA164 was not expressed in female or male flower, indicating miRNA164 might show stage-specific expression in flower development. miRNA167 was up-regulated dramatically in male flower, indicating that it may play an important role in specifying male flower cell types. miRNA156, miRNA157 and miRNA172 may be components of a regulatory pathway mediating the transition between the vegetative and reproductive phases in plants [28]. miRNA166, targeting APETALA2 and type III homeodomain-leucine zipper (HD-Zip) family genes, was dramatically up-regulated in female flower, suggesting AP2 and HD-ZiP genes might be negatively regulated in female flower [29]. miR167 and miR160 are thought to control transcription in response to the phytohormone auxin by targeting mRNAs coding for ARF DNA-binding proteins [30], [31]. These miRNAs were detected in this study as having opposite expression patterns between female and male flower, suggesting that two miRNAs involved in regulation of auxin responses in female flower are different compare with in male flower.

Novel miRNAs Displayed Different Expression Patterns between Female and Male Flower

The 78 novel miRNAs identified here spanned a size range of 20–22 nt, and the majority started with a 5′ U, consistent with results in Japanese apricot [32]. The majority of novel miRNAs showed relatively low expression levels, which was consistent with previous studies predicting that novel miRNAs are often expressed at lower levels than conserved miRNAs [33]. The miRNA*s were generally less abundant than the corresponding mature miRNAs. It has been reported that miRNA*s have important functions through regulation of the miRNA precursors themselves when miRNA*s were more abundant than their corresponding miRNAs [34]. miRNA*s identified were used as extremely strict criteria to identify novel miRNAs [35]. In our study, only 8 unique miRNAs were detected with complementary miRNA*s. Most novel miRNAs do not have identified miRNAs*, likely because of the depth of sequencing, which results in a low probability of identifying low-frequency miRNA*s. The numbers of female-specific novel miRNAs was 6-fold higher than male-specific novel miRNAs, suggesting that abundant novel miRNAs are involved in female flower development. A large proportion of the novel sRNAs identified in andromonoecious P. tomentosa did not have perfect matches in different genome databases, providing more evidence to support our conclusion that these novel miRNAs might be poplar-specific and were first reported in present study. Among all of the novel miRNAs, 11 miRNAs were found with perfect matches in other species, suggesting that some of these newly identified miRNAs may be broadly conserved within angiosperms.

Novel miRNAs Located in Sex Determination Regions

Although studies on determination of gender indicate that dioecy in Populus is genetically controlled, the precise gender-determining systems remain unclear. Based on genetic mapping results, a gender determination locus mapped to different positions on chromosome XIX, depending upon the Populus species [36][38]. Klevebring et al. (2009) found that the proposed sex-determining peritelomeric region of chromosome XIX showed a distinctive pattern of sRNA occurrence that differed significantly from the rest of the genome [39]. In our study, 5 novel miRNAs and 33 targets genes were located on chromosome XIX, indicating that these miRNAs might be involved in sex determination of poplar. The annotated results revealed that over one-third of targets were annotated as disease resistance genes. It has been reported that a NBS–LRR gene supercluster was located on Populus chromosome XIX. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that resistance to a floral pathogen and regulation of gender determination coevolved in a region of the genome that experiences reduced recombination [22]. Interestingly, Pto-F6 was predicted to match a target that encodes DNA (cytosine-5) -methyltransferase implying that DNA methylation might act in flower development.

miRNA Targets and Sub-network Analysis

To better understand the functions of identified miRNAs, we sought to identify potential targets in andromonoecious P. tomentosa using computational analyses. Many targets of conserved miRNAs have been predicted and their functions annotated [40], [41]. Integrating target genes and miRNA expression data identified sub-networks for further investigation. COL1 encodes a zinc finger protein belonging to the first groupings of the flowering-time gene CONSTANS (CO) [42]. Over-expression of COL1 can shorten the period of two distinct circadian rhythms by affecting a light input pathway [43]. In our study, COL1 was targeted by female flower specific Pto-F66, which was expressed in female flowers suggesting that the novel miRNA Pto-F66 likely plays a negative role in the light input pathway in female flower. By contrast, COL6 is part of the third groupings of CO, and is a target of Pto-F19 and Pto-F25. However, these two miRNAs were not correlated with COL6 transcript abundance, indicating that COL6 expression might be regulated by other mechanisms. The target of male specific miRNA Pto-F11, EPR1 encodes a nuclear-localized MYB protein showing rapid induction in response to red light irradiation. EPR1 was significantly down-regulated in male flower, suggesting that this primary phytochrome-responsive factor is likely repressed by the male flower specific novel miRNA Pto-F11 [44]. Another gene involved in the photoperiodic pathway, PFT1 transcript abundances were significantly decreased in male flower. PFT1 is a target of PtoF14 and functions downstream of phyB to regulate the expression of FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT), providing evidence that Pto-F14 might be involved in regulation of flowering time by affecting the light quality pathway [45].

The AP2 gene family contains 144 members encoding at least one AP2 DNA-binding domain and the varied biological functions of AP2 family members range from development to stress and defense responses [46][48]. Conserved miRNA172 has been identified as an important factor regulating AP2 transcription factors [17]. In our study, miRNA172 was equally expressed in female and male flower, but two novel miRNAs, Pto-F36 and Pto-F51, were detected with female-specific expression. AP2 transcript abundance decreased in female flower, providing evidence that these two miRNAs act in regulation of AP2. UFO encodes an F-box protein required for the determination of floral-organ and floral-meristem identity [49]. PM36 is involved in reproductive system development. These genes were targeted by the female-specific novel miRNA Pto-F54 and UFO and PM36 expression were down-regulated in female flower, indicating the broad biological functions of Pto-F54. Calcium is a ubiquitous second messenger in plant signal transduction cascades [50]. Three novel miRNAs were identified as related to Ca2+ transport, including one male flower specific and two female flower specific miRNAs, suggesting that Pto-F16, Pto-28 and Pto-45 are likely play different roles in regulating calcium transport in female and male flower development.

Hormones play a central role in the coordination of internal developmental processes with external environmental signals [51]. A series of genes related to phytohormone synthesis and metabolism are differentially expressed between female and male during flower development (unpublished data). In our study, 13 genes related to five important phytohormones were found to be targeted by 12 novel miRNAs, suggesting that these miRNAs act broadly in regulation of phytohormone synthesis and metabolism. Previous work reported that auxin is necessary for GA-mediated control of root growth, and that attenuation of auxin transport or signaling delays the GA-induced disappearance of RGA (repressor of gal-3) [52]. Among these miRNAs, Pto-F68 targets three genes involved in auxin transport and gibberellin synthesis suggesting that Pto-F68 may regulate the interaction of auxin and gibberellin. Also, a series of physiological studies indicate that ethylene and auxin interact in a number of different ways depending on the cell type, developmental stage, and environmental conditions [51]. EREBF4 and SAUR2 expression were downregulated in female flower and targeted by Pto-F47 miRNA. This result may provide a clue that deepens our understanding of the important regulatory functions of miRNA Pto-F47 in phytohormone interactions. Poplar male flowers abscise earlier than female flowers, suggesting the ABA accumulation and regulation of related genes might be different between female and male flowers. ABA3 encodes an enzyme that catalyzes the generation of the sulfurylated form of MoCo, a cofactor required by aldehyde oxidase, which functions in the last step of ABA biosynthesis in plants [53]. ABI3 encodes a DNA binding factor targeted to promoters responsive to ABA and auxin [54]. These two genes related to ABA biosynthesis and responses are targeted by novel miRNAs Pto-F55 and Pto-F65, which have female flower specific expression, suggesting these miRNAs have negative roles in flower abscission through regulation of ABA metabolism.

MET1, encoding DNA (cytosine-5) –methyltransferase, which maintains CG methylation, was down-regulated in male flower [55]. DDM1, encoding a chromatin remodeling complex with ATPase activity that can remodel nucleosomes, was up-regulated in male flower [56]. MET1 and DDM1 play opposite roles in the regulation of DNA methylation levels; therefore, the different expression of these genes in female and male flowers might alter DNA methylation levels, which are higher in female flower than male (unpublished). Our study indicated that miRNA167, Pto-F6 and Pto-F56 might play a positive regulatory role in maintaining DNA methylation levels of female flower through regulation of MET 1 and DDM1.

Materials and Methods

Plant Materials

Four-hundred and sixty unrelated individuals, representing almost the whole geographic distribution of P. tomentosa, were collected in the national nursery of Guan Xian County (Shandong Province, China). After observation of flower morphology, three 29-year-old unrelated andromonoecious clones (‘2–14’, ‘3605’, and ‘5103’) were found.

All three individuals were used in our study. Sampling that female and male flowers were dissected from the andromonoecious flowers was performed at the last phase of flower development, before pollination. All materials were collected from poplar individuals and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80°C for isolation of RNA. To eliminate genetic backgroud, the two bulks were made by mixing equal amounts of RNA extracted from three andromonoecious poplar female and male flower, respectively.

This study was carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for Observational and field studies (http://www.plosone.org/static/publication ). All necessary permits were obtained for the described field studies. The sampling of all individuals of P. tomentosa was approved by Youhui Zhang, director of National Garden of P. tomentosa in Guan Xian County, Shandong Province.

Total RNA Isolation, sRNA Library Construction, and Solexa Sequencing

Total RNA was isolated from female and male floral tissue by a modified CTAB method [57] with isopropanol instead of lithium chloride for RNA precipitation. Extracted RNA was used for sRNA library construction. Small RNAs were sequenced using an Illumina HiSeq 2000 at the Shanghai Bio Institute.

Sequence data from this article have been deposited in the GenBank Data Library under the accession Nos: KC477266–KC477295.

Bioinformatic Analyses of Sequencing Data and Target Prediction of miRNAs

Clean reads were screened from raw reads by removing contaminating reads, including sequences with adapters, without the insert tag, with poly-A tails, shorter than 18 nt, or longer than 30 nt. Clean reads were then aligned with the Populus genome (http://www.phytozome.net/poplar) using SOAP [58], with no mismatches allowed. Small RNA tags matching exons and introns of mRNAs were excluded from further analysis. Tags matching non-coding RNAs, including rRNAs, scRNA, tRNAs, snRNAs, and snoRNAs, deposited at the Rfam (http://www.sanger.ac.uk/Software/Rfam) and NCBI GenBank databases (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/Blast.cgi) [59] were also excluded from further analysis. The remaining unannotated sRNAs were searched against miRBase 19.0 with a maximum of two mismatches allowed [20] to identify conserved miRNAs in P. beijingensis and then the resulting sequences were screened for the presence of the characteristic hairpin structures using the program RNAfold (http://www.tbi.univie.ac.at/ivo/RNA/ViennaRNA-1.8.1.tar.gz) [60]. We used the prediction software Mireap (https://sourceforge.net/projects/mireap/) to predict novel miRNAs by exploring the secondary structures, DL1 cleavage sites, and minimum free energies of the unannotated sRNA tags that could be mapped to the Populus genome. Basic criteria [35] were used for selecting the potential novel miRNAs. Target genes were predicted in accordance with previous research [61], [62] but with higher stringency; only three mismatches were allowed in the miRNA/target duplex. Target searches were performed using Populus transcripts deposited in the Phytozome v7.0 (http://www.phytozome. net/) and Pfam databases (http://pfam.sanger.ac.uk/), and the results were used to annotate the functions of potential targets. We compared miRNA expression between the two libraries (control and treatment) to determine which miRNAs were differentially expressed. We normalized the expression levels of miRNAs within each library to get the expression of transcripts per million.

5′-RACE

RNA Ligase-Mediated 5′-RACE (RLM-RACE) was performed with the First Choice RLM-RACE Kit (Ambion) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, with slight modifications. Briefly, 10µg of total RNA was directly ligated to the 5′ adaptor followed by reverse transcription with an oligo (dT) primer. PCR was performed with 5′ adaptor primers and 3′ gene-specific primers (Table S4) using cDNA as the template. The RACE products were gel-purified, cloned, and sequenced.

qRT-PCR

Small RNAs (<200 nt) were isolated using the mirVana miRNA Isolation Kit (Ambion, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was carried out as previously described [63] in an ABI PRISM 7500 Fast Real-time PCR System (Ambion, USA) using the SYBR Premix Ex TaqTM Kit (TaKaRa, Japan). The reactions were carried out in a 20 µl volume containing 2 µl of diluted cDNA, 200 nM of each primer, and 19 PCR Master Mix with the following conditions: 95°C for 30 s, and 45 cycles of 95°C for 5 s, 58°C for 15 s, and 72°C for 20 s. Then, a thermal denaturing cycle of 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 1 min was applied to determine the dissociation curves, which were used to verify the specificity of PCR amplifications. All reactions were run in triplicate for each sample. Twelve miRNAs, including six conserved and six novel miRNAs were validated, and 5.8S rRNA was selected as a reference gene for normalization [41] (Table S5 and Table S6).

Network Analysis

The details of sex-specific flower development related miRNAs functional network methods were done according to previously described [64]. Comparative miRNAome analysis combined with realtime quantitative PCR and RACE–PCR revealed 23 miRNAs expressed in andromonoecious poplar flower and each of them has functional targets. Negative correlation between the miRNA and target expression profiles was validated using real-time quantitative PCR. These results indicated that miRNA-mediated regulation does occur in flower development and that these miRNAs with dynamic changes ultimately down-regulate their targets. All miRNA and functional targets were connected for network analysis.

Supporting Information

Figure S1

Morphological and microscopic observation of andromonoecious poplar. A:Morphological characteristics of andromonoecious poplar flowers. B Pollen tubes stained with aniline blue, showing that pollen viability is high and that pollen grows well during selfing. Pt pollen tube, Sti stigma, Pg pollen grain.

(TIF)

Figure S2

Mature and precursor sequences and the predicted stem-loop structures of novel miRNAs from andromonoecious poplar flower tissue. The mature miRNAs are in green, and the miRNA*s are in red.

(TIF)

Table S1

134 loci of 38 unique miRNAs.

(XLS)

Table S2

11 poplar novel miRNAs were detected in other species.

(DOC)

Table S3

miRNAs and their targets.

(XLS)

Table S4

Primers for 5′ RACE mapping of miRNA cleavage sites.

(DOC)

Table S5

Real-time PCR primer sequences for candidate miRNAs.

(DOC)

Table S6

Real-time PCR primer sequences for candidate target genes.

(DOC)

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the Introduction of Foreign Advanced Agricultural Science and Technology into China (No. 2009-4-22), the Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31170622, 30872042), and the Specific Programs in Graduate Science and Technology Innovation of Beijing Forestry University (No.BLYJ201202). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1. Tuskan GA, DiFazio SP, Teichmann T (2004) Poplar genomics is getting popular: The impact of the poplar genome project on tree research. Plant Biol 6: 2–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Zluvova J, Zak J, Janousek B, Vyskot B (2010) Dioecious Silene latifolia plants show sexual dimorphism in the vegetative stage. BMC Plant Bio 10: 208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Sheppard LA, Brunner AM, Krutovskii KV, Rottmann WH, Skinner JS, et al. (2000) A DEFICIENS homolog from the dioecious tree black cottonwood is expressed in female and male floral meristems of the two-whorled, unisexual flowers. Plant Physiol 124: 627–639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Rottmann WH, Meilan R, Sheppard LA, Brunner AM, Skinner JS, et al. (2000) Diverse effects of overexpression of LEAFY and PTLF, a poplar (Populus) homolog of LEAFY/FLORICAULA, in transgenic poplar and Arabidopsis. Plant J 22: 235–245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Boes TK, Strauss SH (1994) Floral phenology and morphology of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Salicaceae) AM J BOT. 81: 562–567. [Google Scholar]
  • 6. An XM, Wang DM, Wang ZL, Li B, Bo WH, et al. (2011) Isolation of a LEAFY homolog from Populus tomentosa: expression of PtLFY in P. tomentosa floral buds and PtLFY-IR-mediated gene silencing in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum). Plant Cell Rep 30: 89–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Song YP, Ma KF, Bo WH, Zhang ZY, Zhang DQ (2012) Sex-specific DNA methylation and gene expression in andromonoecious poplar. Plant Cell Rep 31: 1393–1405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Chen X (2010) Small RNAs-secrets and surprises of the genome. Plant J. 61: 941–958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Bartel DP (2004) MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell 116: 281–297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Llave C, Xie Z, Kasschau KD, Carrington JC (2002) Cleavage of Scarecrow like mRNA targets directed by a class of Arabidopsis miRNA. Science 297: 2053–2056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Navarro L, Dunoyer P, Jay F, Arnold B, Dharmasiri N, et al. (2006) A plant miRNA contributes to antibacterial resistance by repressing auxin signaling. Science 312: 436–439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Wu G, Park MY, Conway SR, Wang JW, Weigel D, et al. (2009) The sequential action of miR156 and miR172 regulates developmental timing in Arabidopsis. Cell 138: 750–759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Baker CC, Sieber P, Wellmer F, Meyerowitz EM (2005) The early extra petals1 mutant uncovers a role for microRNA miR164c in regulating petal number in Arabidopsis. Curr Biol 15: 303–315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Aukerman MJ, Sakai H (2003) Regulation of flowering time and floral organ identity by a MicroRNA and its APETALA2-like target genes. Plant Cell 15: 2730–2741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Chen X (2004) A microRNA as a translational repressor of APETALA2 in Arabidopsis flower development. Science 303: 2022–2025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Schmid M, Uhlenhaut NH, Godard F, Demar M, Bressan R, et al. (2003) Dissection of floral induction pathways using global expression analysis. Development 130: 6001–6012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Chuck G, Meeley R, Irish E, Sakai H, Hake S (2007) Themaize tasselseed4 microRNA controls sex determination and meristem cell fate by targeting Tasselseed6/indeterminate spikelet1. Nat Genet 39: 1517–1521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Sun YH, Shi R, Zhang XH, Chiang VL, Sederoff RR (2012) MicroRNAs in trees Plant Mol Biol. 80: 37–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Barakat A, Wall PK, Diloreto S, Depamphilis CW, Carlson JE (2007) Conservation and divergence of microRNAs in Populus . BMC Genomics 8: 481–496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Griffiths-Jones S, Saini HK, van Dongen S, Enright AJ (2008) miRBase: tools for microRNA genomics. Nucleic Acids Res 36: 154–158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Yin TM, DeFazio SP, Counter LE, Zhang X, Sewell M, et al. (2008) Genome structure and emerging evidence of an incipient sex chromosome in Populus . Genome Res 18: 422–430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Tuskan GA, DiFazio S, Faivre-Rampant P, Gaudet M, Harfouche A, et al. (2012) The obscure events contributing to the evolution of an incipient sex chromosome in Populus: a retrospective working hypothesis. Tree Genet Genomes 8: 559–571. [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Pantaleo V, Szittya G, Moxon S, Miozzi L, Moulton V, et al. (2010) Identification of grapevine microRNAs and their targets using high-throughput sequencing and degradome analysis. Plant J 62: 960–976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Zhao CZ, Xia H, Frazier T, Yao YY, Bi YP, et al. (2010) Deep sequencing identifies novel and conserved microRNAs in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.). BMC Plant Biol 10: 3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Lippman Z, Martienssen R (2004) The role of RNA interference in heterochromatic silencing. Nature 431: 364–370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Lu C, Tej SS, Luo S, Haudenschild CD, Meyers BC, et al. (2005) Elucidation of the small RNA component of the transcriptome. Science 309: 1567–1569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Jones-Rhoades MW, Bartel DP, Bartel B (2006) MicroRNAs and their regulatory roles in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 57: 19–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Nag A, Jack T (2010) Sculpting the flower: the role of microRNAs in flower development. Curr Top Dev Biol 91: 349–378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Ji L, Liu X, Yan J, Wang W, Yumul RE, et al. (2011) ARGONAUTE10 and ARGONAUTE1 regulate the termination of floral stem cells through two microRNAs in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet 7: e1001358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Rajagopalan R, Vaucheret H, Trejo J, Bartel DP (2006) A diverse and evolutionarily fluid set of microRNAs in Arabidopsis thaliana . Genes Dev 20: 3407–3425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Reinhart BJ, Weinstein EG, Rhoades MW, Bartel B, Bartel DP (2002) MicroRNAs in plants. Genes Dev 16: 1616–1626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Gao ZH, Shi T, Luo XY, Zhang Z, Zhuang WB, et al. (2012) High-throughput sequencing of small RNAs and analysis of differentially expressed microRNAs associated with pistil development in Japanese apricot. BMC Genomics 13: 371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Fahlgren N, Howell MD, Kasschau KD, Chapman EJ, Sullivan CM, et al. (2007) High-throughput sequencing of Arabidopsis micro RNAs: evidence for frequent birth and death of MIRNA genes PLoS One. 2: e219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. German MA, Pillay M, Jeong DH, Hetawal A, Luo S, et al. (2008) Global identification of microRNA-target RNA pairs by parallel analysis of RNA ends. Nat Biotechnol 26: 941–946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Meyers BC, Axtell MJ, Bartel B, Bartel DP, Baulcombe D, et al. (2008) Criteria for annotation of plant microRNAs. Plant Cell 20: 3186–3190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Gaudet M, Jorge V, Paolucci I, Beritognolo I, Scarascia Mugnozza G, et al. (2008) Genetic linkage maps of Populus nigra L. including AFLPs, SSRs, SNPs and sex trait. Tree Genet Genomes 4: 25–36. [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Pakull B, Groppe K, Meyer M, Markussen T, Fladung M (2009) Genetic linkage mapping in aspen (Populus tremula L. and Populus tremuloides Michx.). Tree Genet Genomes 5: 505–515. [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Paolucci I, Gaudet M, Jorge V, Beritognolo I, Terzoli S, et al. (2010) Genetic linkage maps of Populus alba L. and comparative mapping analysis of sex determination across Populus species. Tree Genet Genomes 6: 863–875. [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Klevebring D, Street NR, Fahlgren N, Kasschau KD, Carrington JC, et al. (2009) A genome-wide profiling of Populus small RNAs. BMC Genomics 10: 620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Lu S, Sun YH, Chiang VL (2008) Stress-responsive microRNAs in Populus . Plant J 55: 131–151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Lu S, Sun YH, Shi R, Clark C, Li L, et al. (2005) Novel and mechanical stress- responsive microRNAs in Populus trichocarpa that are absent from Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 17: 2186–2203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Griffiths S, Dunford RP, Coupland G, Laurie DA (2003) The evolution of CONSTANS-like gene families in barley, rice, and Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 131: 1855–1867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Ledger S, Strayer C, Ashton F, Kay SA, Putterill J (2001) Analysis of the function of two circadian-regulated CONSTANS-LIKE genes. The Plant J 26: 15–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Kuno N, Møller SG, Shinomura T, Xu XM, Chua NH, et al. (2003) The novel MYB protein EARLY-PHYTOCHROME-RESPONSIVE1 is a component of a slave circadian oscillator in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 15: 2476–2488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Cerdán P, Chory J (2003) Regulation of flowering time by light quality. Nature 423: 881–885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Weigel D (1995) The APETALA2 domain is related to a novel type of DNA binding domain. Plant Cell 7: 388–389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Okamuro JK, Caster B, Villarroel R, Van Montagu M, Jofuku KD (1997) The AP2 domain of APETALA2 defines a large new family of DNA binding proteins in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 7076–7081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Riechmann JL, Meyerowitz EM (1998) The AP2/EREBP family of plant transcription factors Biological chemistry. 379: 633–646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Hepworth SR, Klenz JE, Haughn GW (2006) UFO in the Arabidopsis inflorescence apex is required for floral-meristem identity and bract suppression. Planta 223: 769–778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Cheng SH, Willmann MR, Chen HC, Sheen J (2002) Calcium Signaling through Protein Kinases. The Arabidopsis calcium-dependent protein kinase gene family. Plant Physiol 129: 469–485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Stepanova AN, Yun J, Likhacheva AV, Alonso JM (2007) Multilevel interactions between ethylene and auxin in Arabidopsis roots. Plant Cell 19: 2169–2185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Fu XD, Harberd NP (2003) Auxin promotes Arabidopsis root growth by modulating gibberellin response. Nature 421: 740–743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Xiong LM, Ishitani M, Lee H, Zhu JK (2001) The Arabidopsis LOS5/ABA3 locus encodes a molybdenum cofactor sulfurase and modulates cold stress and osmotic stress– responsive gene expression. Plant Cell 13: 2063–2083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Nag R, Maity MK, DasGupta M (2005) Dual DNA binding property of ABA insensitive 3 like factors targeted to promoters responsive to ABA and auxin. Plant Mol Bio 59: 821–838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Finnegan EJ, Genger RK, Peacock WJ, Dennis ES (1998) DNA methylation in plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 49: 223–247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Brzeski J, Jerzmanowski A (2003) Deficient in DNA methylation 1 (DDM1) defines a novel family of chromatin-remodeling factors. J Biol Chem 278: 823–828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Chang S, Puryear J, Cairney J (1993) A simple and efficient method for isolating RNA from pine trees. Plant Mol Biol Rep 11: 113–116. [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Li R, Li Y, Kristiansen K, Wang J (2008) SOAP: short oligonucleotide alignment program. Bioinformatics 24: 713–714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Benson DA, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Lipman DJ, Ostell J, Sayers EW (2011) GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res 39: 32–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Mathews DH, Sabina J, Zuker M, Turner DH (1999) Expanded sequence dependence of thermodynamic parameters improves prediction of RNA secondary structure. J Mol Biol 288: 911–940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Allen E, Xie Z, Gustafson AM, Carrington JC (2005) microRNA directed phasing during trans-acting siRNA biogenesis in plants. Cell 121: 207–221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Schwab R, Palatnik JF, Riester M, Schommer C, Schmid M, et al. (2005) Specific effects of microRNAs on the plant transcriptome. Dev Cell 8: 517–527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Shi R, Chiang VL (2005) Facile means for quantifying microRNA expression by real-time PCR. Biotechniques 39: 519–525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Wang ZM, Xue W, Dong CJ, Jin LG, Bian SM, et al. (2012) A Comparative miRNAome Analysis Reveals Seven Fiber Initiation-Related and 36 Novel miRNAs in Developing Cotton Ovules. Molecular Plant 5: 889–900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1

Morphological and microscopic observation of andromonoecious poplar. A:Morphological characteristics of andromonoecious poplar flowers. B Pollen tubes stained with aniline blue, showing that pollen viability is high and that pollen grows well during selfing. Pt pollen tube, Sti stigma, Pg pollen grain.

(TIF)

Figure S2

Mature and precursor sequences and the predicted stem-loop structures of novel miRNAs from andromonoecious poplar flower tissue. The mature miRNAs are in green, and the miRNA*s are in red.

(TIF)

Table S1

134 loci of 38 unique miRNAs.

(XLS)

Table S2

11 poplar novel miRNAs were detected in other species.

(DOC)

Table S3

miRNAs and their targets.

(XLS)

Table S4

Primers for 5′ RACE mapping of miRNA cleavage sites.

(DOC)

Table S5

Real-time PCR primer sequences for candidate miRNAs.

(DOC)

Table S6

Real-time PCR primer sequences for candidate target genes.

(DOC)


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES