Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 1993 Nov;13(11):6897–6906. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.11.6897

Homologous and illegitimate recombination in developing Xenopus oocytes and eggs.

C W Lehman 1, M Clemens 1, D K Worthylake 1, J K Trautman 1, D Carroll 1
PMCID: PMC364752  PMID: 8413282

Abstract

Exogenous DNA is efficiently recombined when injected into the nuclei of Xenopus laevis oocytes. This reaction proceeds by a homologous resection-annealing mechanism which depends on the activity of a 5'-->3' exonuclease. Two possible functions for this recombination activity have been proposed: it may be a remnant of an early process in oogenesis, such as meiotic recombination or amplification of genes coding for rRNA, or it may reflect materials stored for embryogenesis. To test these hypotheses, recombination capabilities were examined with oocytes at various developmental stages. Late-stage oocytes performed only homologous recombination, whereas the smallest oocytes ligated the restriction ends of the injected DNA but supported no homologous recombination. This transition from ligation to recombination activity was also seen in nuclear extracts from these same stages. Exonuclease activity was measured in the nuclear extracts and found to be low in early stages and then to increase in parallel with recombination capacity in later stages. The accumulation of exonuclease and recombination activities during oogenesis suggests that they are stored for embryogenesis and are not present for oocyte-specific functions. Eggs were also tested and found to catalyze homologous recombination, ligation, and illegitimate recombination. Retention of homologous recombination in eggs is consistent with an embryonic function for the resection-annealing mechanism. The observation of all three reactions in eggs suggests that multiple pathways are available for the repair of double-strand breaks during the extremely rapid cleavage stages after fertilization.

Full text

PDF
6897

Images in this article

6901Image
on p.6901
6901Image
on p.6901
6902Image
on p.6902
6903Image
on p.6903

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bendig M. M. Persistence and expression of histone genes injected into Xenopus eggs in early development. Nature. 1981 Jul 2;292(5818):65–67. doi: 10.1038/292065a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Carroll D., Garrett J. E., Lam B. S. Isolated clusters of paired tandemly repeated sequences in the Xenopus laevis genome. Mol Cell Biol. 1984 Feb;4(2):254–259. doi: 10.1128/mcb.4.2.254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Carroll D., Wright S. H., Wolff R. K., Grzesiuk E., Maryon E. B. Efficient homologous recombination of linear DNA substrates after injection into Xenopus laevis oocytes. Mol Cell Biol. 1986 Jun;6(6):2053–2061. doi: 10.1128/mcb.6.6.2053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cassuto E., Radding C. M. Mechanism for the action of lambda exonuclease in genetic recombination. Nat New Biol. 1971 Jan 6;229(1):13–16. doi: 10.1038/newbio229013a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Coggins L. W., Gall J. G. The timing of meiosis and DNA synthesis during early oogenesis in the toad, Xenopus laevis. J Cell Biol. 1972 Mar;52(3):569–576. doi: 10.1083/jcb.52.3.569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Davidson E. H., Hough B. R., Amenson C. S., Britten R. J. General interspersion of repetitive with non-repetitive sequence elements in the DNA of Xenopus. J Mol Biol. 1973 Jun 15;77(1):1–23. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(73)90359-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dumont J. N. Oogenesis in Xenopus laevis (Daudin). I. Stages of oocyte development in laboratory maintained animals. J Morphol. 1972 Feb;136(2):153–179. doi: 10.1002/jmor.1051360203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Feinberg A. P., Vogelstein B. A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity. Anal Biochem. 1983 Jul 1;132(1):6–13. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(83)90418-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fishman-Lobell J., Rudin N., Haber J. E. Two alternative pathways of double-strand break repair that are kinetically separable and independently modulated. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Mar;12(3):1292–1303. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.3.1292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Forbes D. J., Kirschner M. W., Newport J. W. Spontaneous formation of nucleus-like structures around bacteriophage DNA microinjected into Xenopus eggs. Cell. 1983 Aug;34(1):13–23. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90132-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Goedecke W., Vielmetter W., Pfeiffer P. Activation of a system for the joining of nonhomologous DNA ends during Xenopus egg maturation. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Feb;12(2):811–816. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.2.811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Grzesiuk E., Carroll D. Recombination of DNAs in Xenopus oocytes based on short homologous overlaps. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987 Feb 11;15(3):971–985. doi: 10.1093/nar/15.3.971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gurdon J. B., Melton D. A. Gene transfer in amphibian eggs and oocytes. Annu Rev Genet. 1981;15:189–218. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.15.120181.001201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gurdon J. B., Wickens M. P. The use of Xenopus oocytes for the expression of cloned genes. Methods Enzymol. 1983;101:370–386. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(83)01028-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hardy S., Aoufouchi S., Thiebaud P., Prigent C. DNA ligase I from Xenopus laevis eggs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 Feb 25;19(4):701–705. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.4.701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hourcade D., Dressler D., Wolfson J. The amplification of ribosomal RNA genes involves a rolling circle intermediate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 Oct;70(10):2926–2930. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.10.2926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jeong-Yu S. J., Carroll D. Test of the double-strand-break repair model of recombination in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Jan;12(1):112–119. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.1.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jeong-Yu S., Carroll D. Effect of terminal nonhomologies on homologous recombination in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Dec;12(12):5426–5437. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.12.5426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kadyk L. C., Hartwell L. H. Sister chromatids are preferred over homologs as substrates for recombinational repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1992 Oct;132(2):387–402. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.2.387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lam B. S., Carroll D. Tandemly repeated DNA sequences from Xenopus laevis. I. Studies on sequence organization and variation in satellite 1 DNA (741 base-pair repeat). J Mol Biol. 1983 Apr 25;165(4):567–585. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(83)80267-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lehman C. W., Carroll D. Homologous recombination catalyzed by a nuclear extract from Xenopus oocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Dec 1;88(23):10840–10844. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.23.10840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lehman C. W., Carroll D. Isolation of large quantities of functional, cytoplasm-free Xenopus laevis oocyte nuclei. Anal Biochem. 1993 Jun;211(2):311–319. doi: 10.1006/abio.1993.1275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lin F. L., Sperle K., Sternberg N. Model for homologous recombination during transfer of DNA into mouse L cells: role for DNA ends in the recombination process. Mol Cell Biol. 1984 Jun;4(6):1020–1034. doi: 10.1128/mcb.4.6.1020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lund E., Dahlberg J. E. In vitro synthesis of vertebrate U1 snRNA. EMBO J. 1989 Jan;8(1):287–292. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03375.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Maryon E., Carroll D. Characterization of recombination intermediates from DNA injected into Xenopus laevis oocytes: evidence for a nonconservative mechanism of homologous recombination. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Jun;11(6):3278–3287. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.6.3278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Maryon E., Carroll D. Degradation of linear DNA by a strand-specific exonuclease activity in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Nov;9(11):4862–4871. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.11.4862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Maryon E., Carroll D. Involvement of single-stranded tails in homologous recombination of DNA injected into Xenopus laevis oocyte nuclei. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Jun;11(6):3268–3277. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.6.3268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ozenberger B. A., Roeder G. S. A unique pathway of double-strand break repair operates in tandemly repeated genes. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Mar;11(3):1222–1231. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.3.1222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Pfeiffer P., Vielmetter W. Joining of nonhomologous DNA double strand breaks in vitro. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Feb 11;16(3):907–924. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.3.907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Plessis A., Perrin A., Haber J. E., Dujon B. Site-specific recombination determined by I-SceI, a mitochondrial group I intron-encoded endonuclease expressed in the yeast nucleus. Genetics. 1992 Mar;130(3):451–460. doi: 10.1093/genetics/130.3.451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Pont-Kingdon G., Dawson R. J., Carroll D. Intermediates in extrachromosomal homologous recombination in Xenopus laevis oocytes: characterization by electron microscopy. EMBO J. 1993 Jan;12(1):23–34. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05628.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Puchta H., Kocher S., Hohn B. Extrachromosomal homologous DNA recombination in plant cells is fast and is not affected by CpG methylation. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Aug;12(8):3372–3379. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.8.3372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Rochaix J. D., Bird A., Barkken A. Ribosomal RNA gene amplification by rolling circles. J Mol Biol. 1974 Aug 15;87(3):473–487. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(74)90098-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Rudin N., Haber J. E. Efficient repair of HO-induced chromosomal breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by recombination between flanking homologous sequences. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Sep;8(9):3918–3928. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.9.3918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Rudin N., Sugarman E., Haber J. E. Genetic and physical analysis of double-strand break repair and recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1989 Jul;122(3):519–534. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.3.519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Rusconi S., Schaffner W. Transformation of frog embryos with a rabbit beta-globin gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Aug;78(8):5051–5055. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.8.5051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Seifert H. S., Chen E. Y., So M., Heffron F. Shuttle mutagenesis: a method of transposon mutagenesis for Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Feb;83(3):735–739. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.3.735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Takahashi N. K., Yamamoto K., Kitamura Y., Luo S. Q., Yoshikura H., Kobayashi I. Nonconservative recombination in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Jul 1;89(13):5912–5916. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.13.5912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Thode S., Schäfer A., Pfeiffer P., Vielmetter W. A novel pathway of DNA end-to-end joining. Cell. 1990 Mar 23;60(6):921–928. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90340-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Wangh L. J. Injection of Xenopus eggs before activation, achieved by control of extracellular factors, improves plasmid DNA replication after activation. J Cell Sci. 1989 May;93(Pt 1):1–8. doi: 10.1242/jcs.93.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wensink P. C., Brown D. D. Denaturation map of the ribosomal DNA of Xenopus laevis. J Mol Biol. 1971 Sep 14;60(2):235–247. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(71)90290-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Zierler M. K., Marini N. J., Stowers D. J., Benbow R. M. Stockpiling of DNA polymerases during oogenesis and embryogenesis in the frog, Xenopus laevis. J Biol Chem. 1985 Jan 25;260(2):974–981. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES