Abstract
Our symposium entitled, “Food Insecurity and Health across the Lifespan” explored the latest research from the economic, medical, pediatric, geriatric, and nutrition literature concerning the measurement, prevalence, predictors, and consequences of food insecurity across the lifespan, with a focus on chronic disease, chronic disease management, and healthcare costs. Consideration of the health impacts of food insecurity is a new and timely area of research, with a considerable potential for translation of the findings into public policy surrounding alleviation of food insecurity. Although it is widely acknowledged that food insecurity and hunger are morally unacceptable, strategies to develop national policies to alleviate hunger must also approach this problem by considering the economic impact of food insecurity on health and well-being. The goals of this symposium were to: 1) learn about the prevalence and severity of food insecurity in the US across the lifespan and how this is increasing with the continued economic downturn; 2) understand the growing body of research that documents the impact of varying degrees of food insecurity on physical and mental health across the lifespan; 3) examine how food insecurity is related to chronic disease; and 4) explore research methodology to determine the impact of food insecurity on healthcare costs and utilization. Our symposium provided new and novel understandings and research initiatives directed toward alleviating food insecurity in America.
Addressing food insecurity in the US
In 2010, almost 50 million Americans were food insecure (1). The high proportions of Americans who are food insecure combined with the numerous, demonstrated, serious health consequences associated with food insecurity make it the leading nutrition-related public health issue in the US today. This brief review of food insecurity in the US began with a discussion of how food insecurity is measured, the extent of food insecurity over time, and the distribution of food insecurity rates by income and across other groups. Then the review focused on how, without changes in the resources available to households, policymakers and program administrators can reduce food insecurity based on findings from the food insecurity literature. These strategies include ensuring that food prices remain low, improving financial management skills, and addressing the myriad challenges facing low-income households. Policymakers and program administrators can also help to reduce food insecurity by increasing the resources available to low-income households through food assistance programs while concentrating on the largest of these, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (formerly known as the Food Stamp Program) (2). Along with reviewing the program and its eligibility criteria, 2 recent proposals that have been made regarding this program were discussed, block granting and restricting food choices, and how both sets of proposals would do serious harm to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program insofar as they would diminish its ability to reduce food insecurity.
Are food insecurity#x2019s health impacts underestimated? Marginal food security also predicts adverse health outcomes in young children and mothers
US food security is measured by the 18-item US Household Food Security Scale (1). Households are considered food secure if respondents affirm <3 scale items, food insecure if 3–7 items are affirmed, and severely food insecure if ≥8 items are affirmed. Households affirming ≤2 of the first 2 items have been termed “marginally food secure” and though considered different from households affirming no items are still categorized as food secure. The first 2 scale items are: 1) “(I/we) worried whether (my/our) food would run out before (I/we) got money to buy more;” and 2) “The food that (I/we) bought just didn’t last, and (I/we) didn’t have money to get more.”
In 2010, 12.6% of respondents affirmed only one or both of these items, with ∼22 million adults and 10 million children living in marginally food-secure households (1). A growing number of studies find that people in marginally food-secure households are more like those in food-insecure households than food-secure households and marginal food security associates with significantly elevated risk for many of the same adverse health outcomes as food insecurity. One recent study compared psychometric characteristics of a food security screener comprising the first 2 scale items with the 18-item scale as a gold standard and validated it by association with child and maternal health outcomes (3). The 2-item screener has high sensitivity and specificity and is similarly predictive of adverse child and maternal health. Treating children and mothers in marginally food-secure households as though they are food secure may exclude some from receiving the services or care they genuinely need. Clinicians and public health workers can avoid this by considering marginal food security as low-severity food insecurity instead of food security.
Food insecurity and chronic diseases
The cycle of having enough food followed by food shortage has been well documented among food-insecure households and is thought to play a direct role in dietary compromise, accumulation of visceral fat, and weight gain. Inadequate nutrition and weight gain play a direct role in the development of chronic diseases. Stress plays an active role in metabolism, potentiating visceral fat accumulation, metabolic syndrome, and chronic disease. Animal models suggest mice exposed to stress conditions and in the presence of high-fat, high-sugar foods secrete stress hormones and insulin, which lead to visceral adiposity and weight gain. Food insecurity is inconsistently associated with overweight and obesity among women; however, several studies have found a significant association between food insecurity and diabetes and poor diabetes management. For example, a significantly higher percentage of adults with diabetes from food-insecure households report difficulty following a diabetic diet, decreased confidence in their ability to manage their diabetes, and a higher score for emotional distress related to diabetes (4). Food insecurity during pregnancy is associated with higher levels of stress, anxiety, and depression (5); gestational weight gain; and over twice the risk of developing gestational diabetes compared with low-income, food-secure women (5). Taken together, these studies suggest food insecurity may play a direct role in the development of chronic disease among adults and for the next generation.
Food insecurity and healthcare costs: research strategies using local, state, and federal data sources for older adults
Food insecurity in older adults is a clinically relevant problem resulting in deleterious consequences on nutrition, physical and mental health, and quality of life (6). Irrespective of the significant healthcare implication of food insecurity, few studies have been done to examine food insecurity and healthcare cost burden in older adults. It may be due in part to lack of appropriate data to examine these issues in the existing datasets. To conduct such studies, it is critical to develop more appropriate datasets of valid, reliable, and comprehensive measures of food insecurity, health status, and healthcare access and to better understand specific mechanism by which food insecurity is related to adverse health outcomes, poor diet-related chronic disease management, and healthcare utilization in older adults. This session discussed how to best utilize and link among available, nationally representative datasets and to develop infrastructure and procedures to establish state and local datasets. As an example, an innovative approach tested in Georgia was introduced to establish a state-level dataset to study food insecurity-related healthcare costs in a sample of low-income, older adults in need of food assistance by linking the state aging services client database for congregate and home-delivered meals with the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services data. Such efforts are essential to direct future research, program, and policy decisions to improve food and healthcare security of low-income older adults.
Acknowledgments
All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Footnotes
This article is a summary of the symposium “Food Insecurity and Health Across the Lifespan” held April 22, 2012 at the ASN Scientific Sessions and Annual Meeting at Experimental Biology 2012 in San Diego, CA. The symposium was sponsored by the American Society for Nutrition and supported in part by an educational grant from DSM Nutritional Products, Inc. The organizer has indicated that related reviews of this symposium will be submitted for publication in an upcoming issue of Advances in Nutrition.
Author disclosures: J. S. Lee, C. Gundersen, J. Cook, B. Laraia, and M. A. Johnson, no conflicts of interest.
Literature Cited
- 1.Coleman-Jensen A, Nord M, Andrews M, Carlson S. Household Food Security in the United States, 2010. Economic Research Report No. (ERR-125). Washington, DC: USDA, Economic Research Service; 2011 [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gundersen C, Kreider B, Pepper J. The economics of food insecurity in the United States. Appl Econ Perspect Pol. 2011;33:281–303 [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hager ER, Quigg AM, Black MM, Coleman SM, Heeren T, Rose-Jacobs R, et al. Development and validity of a 2-item screen to identify families at risk for food insecurity. Pediatrics. 2010;126:e26–32 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Seligman HK, Jacobs EA, Lopez A, Tschann J, Fernandez A. Food insecurity and glycemic control among low-income patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2012;35:233–8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Laraia BA, Siega-Riz AM, Gundersen C. Household food insecurity is associated with self-reported pregravid weight status, gestational weight gain, and pregnancy complications. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010;110:692–701 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lee JS, Fischer JG, Johnson MA. Food insecurity, food and nutrition programs, and aging: experiences from Georgia. J Nutr Elder. 2010;29:116–49 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]