Skip to main content
American Journal of Blood Research logoLink to American Journal of Blood Research
. 2013 May 5;3(2):174–180.

Guidelines and diagnostic algorithm for patients with suspected systemic mastocytosis: a proposal of the Austrian competence network (AUCNM)

Peter Valent 1,2, Elisabeth Aberer 3, Christine Beham-Schmid 4, Christina Fellinger 5, Wolfgang Fuchs 6, Karoline V Gleixner 1,2, Rosemarie Greul 7, Emir Hadzijusufovic 1,2,8, Gregor Hoermann 9, Wolfgang R Sperr 1,2, Friedrich Wimazal 10, Stefan Wöhrl 5,11, Brigitte Zahel 6, Hubert Pehamberger 11
PMCID: PMC3649810  PMID: 23675567

Abstract

Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a hematopoietic neoplasm characterized by pathologic expansion of tissue mast cells in one or more extracutaneous organs. In most children and most adult patients, skin involvement is found. Childhood patients frequently suffer from cutaneous mastocytosis without systemic involvement, whereas most adult patients are diagnosed as suffering from SM. In a smaller subset of patients, SM without skin lesions develops which is a diagnostic challenge. In the current article, a diagnostic algorithm for patients with suspected SM is proposed. In adult patients with skin lesions and histologically confirmed mastocytosis in the skin (MIS), a bone marrow biopsy is recommended regardless of the serum tryptase level. In adult patients without skin lesions who are suffering from typical mediator-related symptoms, the basal serum tryptase level is an important diagnostic parameter. In those with slightly elevated tryptase (15-30 ng/ml), additional non-invasive investigations, including a KIT mutation analysis of peripheral blood cells and sonographic analysis, is performed. In adult patients in whom i) KIT D816V is detected or/and ii) the basal serum tryptase level is clearly elevated (> 30 ng/ml) or/and iii) other clinical or laboratory features are suggesting the presence of occult mastocytosis, a bone marrow biopsy should be performed. In the absence of KIT D816V and other indications of mastocytosis, no bone marrow investigation is required, but the patient’s course and the serum tryptase levels are examined in the follow-up.

Keywords: Mastocytosis, tryptase, KIT D816V, diagnostic algorithm, staging

Introduction

Mastocytosis is a term collectively used for a heterogeneous group of myeloid neoplasms characterized by abnormal expansion and accumulation of mast cells (MC) in one or more organ systems [1-9]. Depending on the organ(s) involved, mastocytosis is divided into cutaneous mastocytosis (CM), systemic mastocytosis (SM), and localized MC tumours [1-9]. The classification of the World Health Organization (WHO) includes several distinct categories of CM and SM [10-13]. The clinical course and prognosis vary considerably between such patients [14-17]. While the long-term outcome in CM and indolent SM (ISM) is excellent, the prognosis and life-expectancy in advanced SM, including aggressive SM (ASM) and MC leukemia (MCL), are poor, and the same holds true for most patients with SM accompanied by an associated hematologic non-MC-lineage disease (SM-AHNMD) [1-8,11-17]. These patients suffer from “hematologic” problems, such as cytopenia, ascites, malabsorption, lymphadenopathy, splenomegaly, hepatopathy or huge osteolyses [1-8,11-17].

In addition, patients with mastocytosis can suffer from the symptoms caused by diverse mast cell mediators, especially when patients have a co-existing IgE-mediated allergy [18-24]. Mediator-related symptoms may be mild, extensive, or even life-threatening [18-24]. In several of these patients, a MC activation syndrome (MCAS) can be documented [18-24]. Apart from mediator-related symptoms, patients with SM may also suffer from the cosmetic issue or from osteoporosis.

Most adult patients with SM are presenting with urticaria pigmentosa-like skin lesions [1-8]. However, the absence of skin lesions does not exclude the presence of SM. These patients are a diagnostic challenge, especially when the symptoms are non-characteristic, the physician is not aware of the potential etiology and/or the serum tryptase level is relatively low (below 20 ng/ml). These patients may or may not suffer from an IgE-dependent allergic disease or from an atopic disorder [19-24]. During the past few years, more and more of such cases have been referred in specialized centers, and many were found to have a slightly elevated serum tryptase (15-20 ng/ml) without definitive signs or symptoms of mastocytosis. For these patients, a clear diagnostic algorithm is lacking.

The European Competence Network on Mastocytosis (ECNM) has been established in 2002, with the intention to increase awareness and to improve diagnosis and therapy in mastocytosis patients [25,26]. In 2011, the Austrian Competence Network on Mastocytosis (AUCNM) has been inaugurated as part and partner of the ECNM. Members of the AUCNM are organizing Annual Meetings as well as seminars. In 2012, the 10 year jubilee of the ECNM has been celebrated in Vienna together with members of the AUCNM, who were involved as organizers and/or presenting experts. The aim of the first defined scientific project of the AUCNM was to establish robust diagnostic algorithms for patients with suspected mastocytosis. The resulting proposed algorithms and recommendations are presented in this article.

Patients with mastocytosis in the skin (MIS)

In children with MIS, a bone marrow biopsy is usually not required, unless the tryptase level is very high, organomegaly (splenomegaly, lymphadenopathy) is found, an abnormal blood count has been documented, or other signs and symptoms would argue for the presence of a systemic hematologic disease [18,23]. Even if a KIT mutation is detectable in the skin or blood, no bone marrow biopsy is performed in these cases. However, these patients are followed until adulthood. In adult patients with MIS, a bone marrow biopsy is recommended independent of the clinical course, symptoms, and serum tryptase level [18,23]. Even if no KIT mutation in the skin and/or peripheral blood is detectable in these patients and even if the serum tryptase level is normal, a bone marrow biopsy is usually recommended [18]. In those in whom SM is diagnosed, a complete staging is performed [18]. In patients who are not agreeable to undergo a bone marrow investigation, the provisional diagnosis of MIS is established and no detailed staging is performed unless clinical signs and symptoms would argue for organ damage [18]. Many of these patients agree to undergo a bone marrow test after some time in the follow up.

Approach to patients with slightly elevated serum tryptase but no evidence of MIS

A more difficult challenge are patients without MIS who otherwise have symptoms or laboratory parameters suggesting the presence of mast cell activation or a clonal mast cell disease [23]. Allergy tests may be positive or negative in these cases. In some of these patients, the case history may reveal typical signs of histamine effects or typical clinical patterns suggesting the presence of SM [18,23] (Table 1). One example is severe anaphylaxis after hymenoptera venom exposure combined with advanced osteopenia or osteoporosis. In such patients, a bone marrow biopsy is recommended independent of the serum tryptase level and other test results. In those with unclear symptoms (and otherwise normal laboratory values), we recommend to perform a KIT mutation analysis using peripheral blood cells and a highly sensitive test such as the DNA clamp PCR [27]. If in such a patient, KIT D816V is detectable, a bone marrow biopsy should be recommended, whereas in those without a mutation at codon 816 of KIT, a wait-and-watch strategy is appropriate, unless other signs and symptoms would argue for the presence of a mast cell proliferative neoplasm or another bone marrow disease. The follow up may also reveal a constantly increasing serum tryptase level. In these patients, a bone marrow examination is also recommended in order to exclude (or reveal) the development of SM or another myeloid neoplasm. An algorithm for adult patients with slightly elevated tryptase without MIS is shown in Figure 1.

Table 1.

Typical clinical features and symptoms suggesting the presence of systemic mastocytosis (SM)* or a mast cell activation syndrome

Feature/symptom Typical laboratory findings
Anaphylaxis with hypotension Allergy tests (specific IgE) negative
Severe anaphylactic shock after hymenoptera venom exposure** Allergy tests positive or negative and: tryptase elevated during the event**
Headache plus diarrhea responsive to histamine receptor antagonists increased histamine levels (plasma, urine), tryptase may or may not increase
Unexplained pruritus (+/- urticaria or flushing) responsive to histamine receptor antagonists no skin disease, allergy, or internal disorder explaining symptoms are found, tryptase may or may not increase
Other allergy-like symptoms that are responsive to histamine receptor antagonists or mast cell-targeting drugs (like cromolyn) no allergy and no other disease explaining the symptoms are found, tryptase may or may not increase
Bone pain due to osteopenia or osteoporosis*** T score below -2 (below -2.5) as assessed by age-adjusted osteodensitometry
*

if two or more of these features/symptoms are recorded in the same patient, the likelihood increases that the patient is suffering from SM.

**

meeting the criteria of mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS).

***

counts especially in man, and when other causes of osteoporosis have been excluded.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

In adult patients without evidence of mastocytosis in the skin (MIS) but suspected systemic mastocytosis (SM), the basal serum tryptase level is an important initial screen parameter. In patients who have a clearly elevated basal tryptase, a bone marrow biopsy has to be considered. In patients with normal or slightly elevated tryptase, peripheral blood cells should be examined for the presence of KIT D816V using a highly sensitive test. In patients in whom typical signs and symptoms (osteoporosis, histamine-symptoms, anaphylaxis with negative allergy-test) or KIT D816V are detected, a bone marrow biopsy should be performed. If the KIT mutant is not detectable and symptoms are non-specific or can be explained by another disorder involving mast cells (e.g. allergy), the patient will be examined in the follow up, including repeated examinations of blood counts and serum tryptase levels.

Patients with a clearly elevated serum tryptase but no evidence of MIS

In adult patients with clearly elevated basal serum tryptase levels, a bone marrow examination should be performed regardless of laboratory findings or symptoms [18,23]. This recommendation is based on the fact that clearly elevated tryptase levels are primarily and rather specifically found in patients with mastocytosis or other myeloid neoplasms, such as a myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or myeloid leukemia. A list of differential diagnoses in patients with slightly elevated serum tryptase levels (relevant in those without MIS) is shown in Table 2.

Table 2.

Differential diagnoses in patients with slightly elevated serum tryptase levels* but no evidence of mastocyosis in the skin

Diagnosis Major cellular source of tryptase
Hematologic
    Systemic Mastocytosis (SM) Neoplastic mast cells
    Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) Neoplastic (immature) basophils
    Chronic eosinophilic leukemia (CEL) Neoplastic mast cells or basophils
    Chronic basophilic leukemia (CBL) Neoplastic (immature) basophils
    Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) Myeloblasts
    Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) Blast cells, basophils or mast cells
    Myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) Blast cells, basophils or mast cells
    MDS/MPN overlap neoplasm Blast cells, basophils or mast cells
    Myelomastocytic leukemia (MML) Blast cells and neoplastic mast cells
Non-Hematologic Reactive
    Allergic reaction (transient increase) Mast cells
    Mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS) Mast cells
    Atopic disorders Mast cells
    Chronic inflammatory disease (CID) Mast cells
    Chronic helminth infection Mast cells
Others/Pitfalls/Varia
    Chronic severe renal failure Mast cells
    Normal healthy individual Mast cells
    False positive test result** -
*

Total serum tryptase 15-30 ng/mL as assessed by the flouroenzyme-immunoassay (FIA).

**

False positive results have previously been produced in a few patients, sometimes on the basis of heterophilic antibodies.

However, the new generation of the FIA developed more recently, should avoid this problem.

An important aspect is that tryptase levels also increase during and shortly after an anaphylactic episode [23,28-30]. Therefore, in such patients, the serum tryptase level has to be reevaluated at least 2 days after complete resolution of all symptoms [23,28-30]. Another important question is: what is “clearly elevated”? The diagnostic cut off level in SM remains 20 ng/ml. However, more and more apparently healthy individuals appear to have a slightly elevated tryptase, ranging between 15 ng/mL and 30 ng/mL. Therefore, we recommend that a tryptase level exceeding 30 ng/mL should be considered as clearly elevated in adult patients. In such patients, a bone marrow investigation is justified even if the serum tryptase level remains at a constant range in the follow up and no signs or symptoms indicative of SM or another myeloid neoplasm are found.

By contrast, in children, the situation is different. Here, the likelihood of a systemic disease (mastocytosis or other myeloid neoplasm) is low even if the serum tryptase level is slightly elevated. Therefore, in childhood patients with MIS, no bone marrow biopsy is performed even if a moderately elevated tryptase is detected [18,23]. These patients are diagnosed as suffering from CM, unless clear clinical, radiologic or laboratory signs of a systemic disease are present [18]. In cases with a constantly increasing serum tryptase level or massively evelated tryptase (> 100 ng/mL) or other clinical or laboratory signs of a systemic neoplastic process (e.g. organomegaly), a bone marrow biopsy is required, even in children. Detailed diagnostic algorithms for children and adults have been reported previously [18].

Follow up strategies in suspected mastocytosis

The follow up strategy depends on the symptoms and laboratory parameters. In all these patients, the serum tryptase level should be determined in regular time intervals. This holds also true for patients suffering from mastocytosis, independent of the disease variant [18,23]. In addition, blood counts and serum chemistry parameters should be recorded in the follow up. In those in whom the diagnosis of mastocytosis is likely, a repeated examination of the peripheral blood for the presence of KIT D816V should be performed. A re-biopsy of the bone marrow should be considered in patients in whom the serum tryptase levels increase or KIT D816V becomes detectable in the follow up. A special situation is suspected SM with or without MIS in children. In these patients, serum tryptase levels and other laboratory parameters should also be recorded in the follow up. An open question is whether these parameters need to be recorded even when skin lesions disappear in the follow up. In those patients in whom serum tryptase levels remain normal, no further follow up may be required. In all patients in whom skin lesions persist into adulthood, a bone marrow biopsy should be performed regardless of the serum tryptase level and other parameters [18,23]. Whereas childhood patients are usually managed by dermatologists, adult patients should be managed in a multidisciplinary approach involving a hematology center, a bone marrow pathologist, and an experienced dermatologist who excludes or documents the presence of MIS by inspection and biopsy.

Summary and future perspectives

The approach to adult patients with suspected mastocytosis is a diagnostic challenge in daily practice, especially when the physician is unaware of the biology and etiology of the disease, no skin lesions are present, blood counts are normal and the serum tryptase level is slightly elevated or within normal range. The KIT mutation analysis (KIT D816V) in the peripheral blood is an essential pre-invasive test in these patients. A positive test result is suggestive of the presence of SM, with all clinical consequences, including a bone marrow biopsy. Resulting algorithms and recommendations of the AUCNM may greatly assist in reducing unnecessary referrals and investigations, and help avoid unjustified misinformation and disconcertment of patients. In the foreseeable future, additional disease-related markers and genetic testing [31] will also be available and may further improve preinvasive diagnostics and algorithms.

Abbreviations

AHNMD

associated hematologic non-mast cell lineage disease

ASM

aggressive systemic mastocytosis

AUCNM

Austrian Competence Network on Mastocytosis

CM

cuntaneous mastocytosis

ECNM

European Competence Network on Mastocytosis

ISM

indolent systemic mastocytosis

MC

mast cell(s)

MCAS

mast cell activation syndrome

MCL

mast cell leukemia

MDS

myelodysplastic syndrome(s)

MIS

mastocytosis in the skin

MPN

myeloproliferative neoplasm(s)

SM

systemic mastocytosis

SSM

smoldering systemic mastocytosis

TKI

tyrosine kinase inhibitor(s)

WHO

World Health Organization

References

  • 1.Valent P. Biology, classification and treatment of human mastocytosis. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1996;108:385–397. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Escribano L, Akin C, Castells M, Orfao A, Metcalfe DD. Mastocytosis: current concepts in diagnosis and treatment. Ann Hematol. 2002;81:677–690. doi: 10.1007/s00277-002-0575-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Valent P, Akin C, Sperr WR, Horny HP, Arock M, Lechner K, Bennett JM, Metcalfe DD. Diagnosis and treatment of systemic mastocytosis: state of the art. Br J Haematol. 2003;122:695–717. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2003.04575.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Akin C, Metcalfe DD. Systemic mastocytosis. Annu Rev Med. 2004;55:419–432. doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.55.091902.103822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Valent P, Sperr WR, Schwartz LB, Horny HP. Diagnosis and classification of mast cell proliferative disorders: delineation from immunologic diseases and non-mast cell hematopoietic neoplasms. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;114:3–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.02.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Horny HP, Sotlar K, Valent P. Mastocytosis: state of the art. Pathobiology. 2007;74:121–132. doi: 10.1159/000101711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Metcalfe DD. Mast cells and mastocytosis. Blood. 2008;112:946–956. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-11-078097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Arock M, Valent P. Pathogenesis, classification and treatment of mastocytosis: state of the art in 2010 and future perspectives. Expert Rev Hematol. 2010;3:497–516. doi: 10.1586/ehm.10.42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sperr WR, Valent P. Diagnosis, progression patterns and prognostication in mastocytosis. Expert Rev Hematol. 2012;5:261–274. doi: 10.1586/ehm.12.12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Valent P, Horny HP, Escribano L, Longley BJ, Li CY, Schwartz LB, Marone G, Nuñez R, Akin C, Sotlar K, Sperr WR, Wolff K, Brunning RD, Parwaresch RM, Austen KF, Lennert K, Metcalfe DD, Vardiman JW, Bennett JM. Diagnostic criteria and classification of mastocytosis: a consensus proposal. Leuk Res. 2001;25:603–625. doi: 10.1016/s0145-2126(01)00038-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Valent P, Horny HP, Li CY, Longley JB, Metcalfe DD, Parwaresch RM, Bennett JM. Mastocytosis. In: Jaffe ES, Harris NL, Stein H, Vardiman JW, editors. World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2001. pp. 291–302. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Valent P, Akin C, Sperr WR, Horny HP, Metcalfe DD. Mast cell proliferative disorders: current view on variants recognized by the World Health Organization. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2003;17:1227–1241. doi: 10.1016/s0889-8588(03)00089-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Horny HP, Akin C, Metcalfe DD, Bain BJ, Akin C, Escribano L, Valent P, Bain B. Mastocytosis (mast cell disease) In: Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Pileri SA, Stein H, Thiele J, Vardiman JW, editors. World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumours. Pathology & Genetics. Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2008. pp. 54–63. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sperr WR, Escribano L, Jordan JH, Schernthaner GH, Kundi M, Horny HP, Valent P. Morphologic properties of neoplastic mast cells: delineation of stages of maturation and implication for cytological grading of mastocytosis. Leuk Res. 2001;25:529–536. doi: 10.1016/s0145-2126(01)00041-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Valent P, Akin C, Sperr WR, Escribano L, Arock M, Horny HP, Bennett JM, Metcalfe DD. Aggressive systemic mastocytosis and related mast cell disorders: current treatment options and proposed response criteria. Leuk Res. 2003;27:635–641. doi: 10.1016/s0145-2126(02)00168-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lim KH, Tefferi A, Lasho TL, Finke C, Patnaik M, Butterfield JH, McClure RF, Li CY, Pardanani A. Systemic mastocytosis in 342 consecutive adults: survival studies and prognostic factors. Blood. 2009;113:5727–5736. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-02-205237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pardanani A, Lim KH, Lasho TL, Finke CM, McClure RF, Li CY, McClure RF, Li CY, Tefferi A. WHO subvariants of indolent mastocytosis: clinical details and prognostic evaluation in 159 consecutive adults. Blood. 2010;115:150–151. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-10-249979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Valent P, Akin C, Escribano L, Födinger M, Hartmann K, Brockow K, Castells M, Sperr WR, Kluin-Nelemans HC, Hamdy NA, Lortholary O, Robyn J, van Doormaal J, Sotlar K, Hauswirth AW, Arock M, Hermine O, Hellmann A, Triggiani M, Niedoszytko M, Schwartz LB, Orfao A, Horny HP, Metcalfe DD. Standards and standardization in mastocytosis: consensus statements on diagnostics, treatment recommendations and response criteria. Eur J Clin Invest. 2007;37:435–453. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2007.01807.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bonadonna P, Perbellini O, Passalacqua G, Caruso B, Colarossi S, Dal Fior D, Castellani L, Bonetto C, Frattini F, Dama A, Martinelli G, Chilosi M, Senna G, Pizzolo G, Zanotti R. Clonal mast cell disorders in patients with systemic reactions to Hymenoptera stings and increased serum tryptase levels. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;123:680–686. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.11.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Alvarez-Twose I, González de Olano D, Sánchez-Muñoz L, Matito A, Esteban-López MI, Vega A, Mateo MB, Alonso Díaz de Durana MD, de la Hoz B, Del Pozo Gil MD, Caballero T, Rosado A, Sánchez Matas I, Teodósio C, Jara-Acevedo M, Mollejo M, García-Montero A, Orfao A, Escribano L. Clinical, biological, and molecular characteristics of clonal mast cell disorders presenting with systemic mast cell activation symptoms. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;125:1269–1278. e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.02.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Brockow K, Metcalfe DD. Mastocytosis. Chem Immunol Allergy. 2010;95:110–124. doi: 10.1159/000315946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Akin C, Valent P, Metcalfe DD. Mast cell activation syndrome: Proposed diagnostic criteria. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;126:1099–1104. e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.08.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Valent P, Akin C, Arock M, Brockow K, Butterfield JH, Carter MC, Castells M, Escribano L, Hartmann K, Lieberman P, Nedoszytko B, Orfao A, Schwartz LB, Sotlar K, Sperr WR, Triggiani M, Valenta R, Horny HP, Metcalfe DD. Definitions, criteria and global classification of mast cell disorders with special reference to mast cell activation syndromes: a consensus proposal. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2012;157:215–225. doi: 10.1159/000328760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wimazal F, Geissler P, Shnawa P, Sperr WR, Valent P. Severe life-threatening or disabling anaphylaxis in patients with systemic mastocytosis: a single-center experience. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2012;157:399–405. doi: 10.1159/000329218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Valent P, Arock M, Bischoff SC, Bühring HJ, Brockow K, Escribano L, Födinger M, Grabbe J, Hartmann K, Henz BM, Horny HP, Kluin-Nelemans HC, Lima M, Marone G, Orfao A, Parwaresch RM, Sillaber C, Sotlar K, Sperr WR, Triggiani M, Van Doormaal JJ, Wolff K, Zuberbier T. The European Competence Network on Mastocytosis (ECNM) Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2004;116:647–651. doi: 10.1007/s00508-004-0253-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Valent P, Arock M, Bonadonna P, Brockow K, Broesby-Olsen S, Escribano L, Gleixner KV, Grattan C, Hadzijusufovic E, Hägglund H, Hermine O, Horny HP, Kluin-Nelemans HC, Maurer M, Niedoszytko M, Nedoszytko B, Nilsson G, Oude-Elberink HN, Orfao A, Radia D, Reiter A, Siebenhaar F, Sotlar K, Sperr WR, Triggiani M, Vandoormaal JJ, Várkonyi J, Yavuz S, Hartmann K. European Competence Network on Mastocytosis (ECNM): 10-year jubilee, update, and future perspectives. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2012;124:807–814. doi: 10.1007/s00508-012-0293-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sotlar K, Escribano L, Landt O, Möhrle S, Herrero S, Torrelo A, Lass U, Horny HP, Bültmann B. One-step detection of c-kit point mutations using peptide nucleic acid-mediated polymerase chain reaction clamping and hybridization probes. Am J Pathol. 2003;162:737–746. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63870-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Schwartz LB, Metcalfe DD, Miller JS, Earl H, Sullivan T. Tryptase levels as an indicator of mast-cell activation in systemic anaphylaxis and mastocytosis. N Engl J Med. 1987;316:1622–1626. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198706253162603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Shanmugam G, Schwartz LB, Khan DA. Prolonged elevation of serum tryptase in idiopathic anaphylaxis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006;117:950–951. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.12.1356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Schwartz LB. Diagnostic value of tryptase in anaphylaxis and mastocytosis. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2006;26:451–463. doi: 10.1016/j.iac.2006.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nedoszytko B, Niedoszytko M, Lange M, van Doormaal J, Gleń J, Zabłotna M, Renke J, Vales A, Buljubasic F, Jassem E, Roszkiewicz J, Valent P. Interleukin-13 promoter gene polymorphism -1112C/T is associated with the systemic form of mastocytosis. Allergy. 2009;64:287–294. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2008.01827.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Blood Research are provided here courtesy of e-Century Publishing Corporation

RESOURCES