Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2013 May 9;8(5):e62267. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062267

Validation of an Excretory/Secretory Antigen Based-Elisa for the Diagnosis of Opisthorchis felineus Infection in Humans from Low Trematode Endemic Areas

Maria Angeles Gómez-Morales 1,*, Alessandra Ludovisi 1, Marco Amati 1, Edoardo Pozio 1
Editor: Matthias Johannes Schnell2
PMCID: PMC3650035  PMID: 23671589

Abstract

Since opisthorchiasis does not show pathognomonic signs or symptoms, physicians can have serious problems to make a differential diagnosis of this infection in non endemic areas, in particular when there is a simultaneous occurrence with other seasonal infections. Moreover, symptomatic infections due to O. felineus can last a few weeks and then the signs and symptoms disappear, but the worms survive in the bile ducts for years causing hepatobiliary diseases including hepatomegaly, cholangitis, fibrosis of the periportal system, cholecystitis, and gallstones. Consequently, an early diagnosis prevents chronicity and loss of working days. The detection of specific antibodies has been considered as a complementary tool to the fecal examination to establish the definitive diagnosis of this infection and for the follow up. Therefore the aim of this work was the development and validation of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using excretory/secretory antigens (ESA) from O. felineus adult worms to detect anti-Opisthorchis IgG in human sera. A total of 370 human sera were tested: 144 sera from persons with a confirmed diagnosis of opisthorchiasis, 110 sera from healthy Italian people, and 116 sera from people with other parasitic or non-parasitic infections. Results were analyzed by receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The accuracy of the test, calculated by the area under curve (AUC), yielded a 0.999 value, indicating the high performance of the test. The sensitivity was 100% (95% CI: 97.40% to 100%) and no false-negative sera were detected; the specificity was 99.09% (95% CI: 95.02% to 99.83%). The validated ELISA shows a good performance in terms of sensitivity, repeatability and reproducibility, and it is suitable to detect anti-Opisthorchis IgG in human sera for diagnostic purposes and for the follow up to assess the efficacy of drug treatment.

Introduction

Opisthorchiasis and clonorchiasis are zoonotic diseases caused by liver flukes of the family Opisthorchiidae (Ophisthorchis viverrini, O. felineus and Clonorchis sinensis) which are transmitted by the ingestion of raw or undercooked fish parasitized by the larval stage (metacercaria). Six hundred and eighty million people throughout the world are estimated to be at risk of infection by these parasites, although each species have a particular geographical distribution [1]. Ophisthorchis felineus infection has been documented in humans and/or animals in 13 countries of the European Union [2]. In Italy, this parasite was first described in cats and dogs in Tuscany and Piedmont Regions, yet for over 100 years the infection was not detected or reported in humans and no investigation on this pathogen was carried out [3], [4]. This scenario has changed radically in the last decade with the occurrence of several outbreaks of acute human infections [2], [5][8].

Liver flukes have a complex biological cycle; they need two intermediate (a freshwater snail and a fish) and one definitive (a fish eating carnivore) hosts to complete their cycle. A wide range of species of freshwater fish of the family Cyprinidae can be naturally infected by these trematodes. Carnivore mammals such as cats, dogs, and foxes act as definitive hosts where the parasite develops into adults in the intra- and extra-hepatic bile ducts and in the gallbladder. Humans are an accidental host [2], [9].

Most people with opistorchiasis or clonorchiasis have unspecific symptoms or no symptoms at all, whereas heavy and long lasting infections are linked to hepatobiliary diseases including hepatomegaly, cholangitis, fibrosis of the periportal system, cholecystitis, and gallstones, and are strongly associated with cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). O. viverrini and C. sinensis are classified as group 1 carcinogens by the International Agency for Research on Cancer [10], [11]. Regarding O. felineus, acute and mild infections with unspecific symptoms and asymptomatic infections have been described, but direct evidences supporting a role of O. felineus infection as a risk factor for CCA development are scarce [8], [9], [12].

A specific and early diagnosis of opisthorchiasis in humans is crucial for an appropriate and timely treatment. Since opisthorchiasis does not show pathognomonic signs or symptoms, physicians can have serious problems to make a differential diagnosis of this infection in non endemic areas, in particular when there is a simultaneous occurrence with other seasonal infections, for instance the flu [8]. Moreover, symptomatic infections due to O. felineus can last a few weeks and then the signs and symptoms disappear, but the worms survive in the bile ducts for years causing hepatobiliary diseases [8]. The time between infection and the detection of anti-Opisthorchis IgG ranges from three to eight weeks [6][8]. Consequently, an early diagnosis prevents chronicity, to lose working days, and decreasing the potential risk to develop CCA .

Even if detection of fluke eggs in stools represent the best way to reach a definitive diagnosis of opisthorchiasis, it has become increasingly unreliable in cases of low worm burden [13], [14]. Studies in humans have shown a close relationship between parasite-specific IgG and intensity of O. viverrini infection [15][17]. Moreover in O. viverrini infections, the level of parasite-specific IgG is correlated to the severity of the clinical disease rather than to the egg counts in stools [16], [18]. Consequently, the detection of specific antibodies has been considered as a complementary tool to establish the definitive diagnosis of this infection [19][21]. In addition, serology is an excellent tool to monitor the success of the treatment during the follow up [6].

The serodiagnosis of liver fluke infections caused by O. viverrini and C. sinensis has been attempted using crude adult extracts, metabolic products and egg antigens together with different immunodiagnostic methods, producing results of varying degrees of sensitivity and specificity [16], [17], [19], [22][26]. The indirect haemagglutination test, intradermal test and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), have been developed using the crude somatic extract of O. felineus adult worms as antigens [23]. According to Meniavtseva et al., the ELISA shows the best performance among the serological tests [27]. However, its suitability in the detection of O. felineus infection in humans is limited by the lack of information on the sensitivity and specificity of the test.

Therefore, the aim of this work was the development and validation of an ELISA using excretory/secretory antigens from O. felineus adult worms to detect anti-Opisthorchis IgG antibodies in human sera.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

The human sera have been collected by various Italian health services and have been sent to ISS on different times for a confirmation of the diagnosis of opisthorchiasis or other parasitic infections or as a negative reference population to calculate the cut-off value for serological assays. All samples were received in an anonymous form. Written informed consent was received to all patients who provided serum samples. The present work was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS, www.iss.it/coet/?lang=1)

Naturally infected tenches (Tinca tinca) fished from the Bolsena lake (Viterbo province, Central Italy), were from the local market.

Syrian golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) were housed in the Animal Care Unit of the Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS) and their use was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the ISS. Experiments were performed according to the European Directive 63/2010.

Antigens

Naturally infected tenches (Tinca tinca) from the Bolsena lake (Viterbo province, Central Italy) were skinned and the filets were mechanically chopped and treated with artificial gastric juice (9 g pepsin, powder 1∶10 000 NF, 7 ml 25% HCl in 1 L tap water) using a magnetic stirrer at 38°C. After approximately 30 min, the flesh was digested, the metacercariae were isolated by sedimentation, counted in triplicate, and orally administered (50–60 metacercariae per animal) to 100 g Syrian golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) housed in the Animal Care Unit of the Istituto Superiore di Sanità, according to the European Directive 63/2010 [28]. From two months post infection (p.i.) onward, the infection of the hamsters was weekly monitored by the egg count in fecal samples. Four months p.i., animals were euthanized and the liver was removed and washed twice in warm (37°C) phosphate buffered saline (PBS) pH 7.2 in a Petri dish. The gall bladder was opened with small scissors and the enlarged bile ducts were very gently opened to avoid cutting the trematodes. To release the liver flukes from the most remote areas of the organ, a gently pressure was applied to the liver. Liver flukes recovered from the biliary ducts were transferred to 50 mL tubes and washed 5 times in PBS supplemented with Penicillin (500 units/ml) and Streptomycin (500 µg/ml), (GIBCO, Grand Island, NY, USA), at 37°C. Liver flukes (7–12×1.5–2.5 mm) were additionally washed four times allowing them to settle in RPMI 1640 (GIBCO, Grand Island, NY, USA) supplemented with penicillin (500 U/ml) and streptomycin (500 µg/ml).

To prepare excretory/secretory antigens (ESA), 5 worms per 5 mL were suspended in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 1 M HEPES, 200 mML-glutamine, 100 mM Na-pyruvate (all from GIBCO, Grand Island, NY, USA), and 5,000 units of penicillin/streptomycin (Euroclone, BioAir s.r.l., Italy), and incubated with 5% CO2 in 6 well culture plates (Corning Life Sciences, Pittsburg, PA, USA) at 37°C for up 15 days. The culture fluid was changed every 24 h, dead worms were removed, pooled, and centrifuged to remove the eggs. The supernatants collected daily were pooled and transferred to 50 mL conical tubes. The supernatants were filtered through a 0.2 µm YM-5 filter, concentrated 100 times in an Amicon® pressure concentrating chamber (Amicon Inc. Billerica, MA, USA), and then dialysed against PBS several times. To determine the protein concentration and to establish the quality of the batch (i.e., no bacterial or somatic contamination), the optical density (OD) was evaluated at a 280/260 nm ratio; antigens with a ratio higher than 1.0 were used. Finally, 1 µL/mg of a cocktail of protein inhibitors (Sigma P8465, Saint Louis, MO, USA) was added to the antigens which were aliquoted and stored at −80°C.

Human sera

A total of 370 human serum samples were analyzed. Of these, 110 were from healthy Italians, who, according to the Italian law, were considered suitable for blood donation and lived in a non–endemic area for trematode infections (true negative, TN); 144 sera were from people with a confirmed diagnosis of opisthorchiasis based on the presence of O. felineus eggs in their stools (true positive, TP). After formol-ether concentration of fecal samples, parasites were searched by light microscopy and, if the samples were negative, O. felineus DNA was searched in the fecal sediment by PCR [7]. These people acquired the infection in the course of O. felineus outbreaks which occurred in Italy [6][8]. All serum samples used in this study originated from adults, about 50% male. Additional 116 serum samples from people with other parasitic or non-parasitic infections were tested: Toxoplasma gondii (7), Cysticercus cellulosae (14), Echinococcus granulosus (10), Loa Loa (9), Toxocara spp. (15), Anisakis spp. (3), Trichinella spp (44), Fasciola hepatica (10), HIV- Cryptosporidium co-infection (3), and HIV-Enterocytozoon bieneusi co-infection (1). The diagnosis of these parasitic infections were based on parasitological and/or serological tests. All participants provided oral informed consent to have blood samples drawn.

ELISA

A standard protocol was used. Briefly, 96-well microtiter plates (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) were filled with 100 µl/well of O. felineus ESA (2 µg/ml) in carbonate buffered saline pH 9.6±0.2. After incubation at 37°C for 1 h, the plates were washed three times by an automatic plate washer (Dynex Technologies, Denkendorf, Germany) with washing solution (0.5% Tween 20 in PBS, pH 7.3±0.2), blocked by adding 200 µl/well of blocking solution (0.5% BSA, 1% Tween 20), and incubated at 37°C for 1 h. After another washing, 100 µl/well of each 1/200 diluted serum sample was added in duplicate, and the plates were incubated at 37°C for 30 min. After another washing, 100 µl/well of the diluted anti–human IgG peroxidase-labeled antibodies (Kierkegaard and Perry Laboratories, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) were added, and incubated at 37°C for 1 h. Finally, after a last wash, 100 µl/well of the substrate solution containing 3, 3′,5,5′–tetramethylbenzidine and 0.02% of hydrogen peroxide in a citric acid buffer, was added and the plates were incubated at room temperature. The reaction was stopped by adding 50 µl/well of 1 N HCl solution. The OD value was obtained by reading the reaction at 450 nm using an ELISA plate microtiter reader (Dynex Technologies). Each plate contained four TP and four TN reference serum samples, each of which was tested in duplicate. Since raw OD values are absolute measurements that are influenced by test temperature, test parameters, and photometric instruments, the results were expressed as a function of the reactivity of the positive control serum sample with the highest value among the four included in each run of the assay. This control must yield a result that is in the linear range of measurement. The mean OD values of the TP and TN reference sera, as well as the mean OD values of the duplicate test sera, were then calculated, and for each serum sample, an ELISA index (IE) expressed as the percentage of positivity was calculated according to the following equation:

graphic file with name pone.0062267.e001.jpg

Statistical analysis

The receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was carried out using the EpiTools epidemiological calculators [29]. This procedure optimizes the interpretation of the ELISA when well-defined positive and negative populations are available for the analysis. The ROC curve is a graphical plot of the sensitivity versus “1 – specificity” for a binary classifier system, using various cut-off values. This allows to select the cut-off value that gives the best balance of sensitivity and specificity for the test under consideration [30]. The repeatability of the test was evaluated by comparing the differences between the OD values of the serum duplicates and their mean [31]. To determine which parameter provided the most accurate result (i.e., the mean OD of the duplicates or the IE), the area under the ROC curve was calculated for each parameter. The specificity and the sensitivity of the test were interpreted according to the ROC analysis. The interassay variability was assessed by testing three positive and six negative control sera in eight different work sessions, the mean of the OD values was determined and used to calculate the coefficient of variation (CV).

Accreditation

The laboratory is accredited according to ISO/IEC 17025:2005 by the Italian accreditation body ACCREDIA (www.accredia.it).

Results

ROC curves were built with data from the two defined TP and TN reference populations. The descriptive statistical summary of the data is shown in Table 1. The AUC was 0.999 for both the mean OD value of the duplicates and the IE, indicating that the two parameters provided equally accurate results (Fig. 1). The ROC optimized cut-offs were 18% for IE and 0.341 for the OD values; on the basis of these cut-off values, the sensitivity reached 100% (95% CI: 97.40% to 100%) and the specificity yielded 99.09% (95% CI: 95.02% to 99.83%). No false-negative (FN) sera were found; however, 5 (4.5%) false positive (FP) sera were detected among TN sera and 17 (14.6%) FP sera were detected from persons with other parasitic infections, namely one with C. cellulose, three with E. granulosus, four with L. loa, one with Toxocara spp., and eight with Trichinella spp.

Table 1. Descriptive indices of ELISA results to detect anti-Opisthorchis IgG in sera from persons with a confirmed diagnosis of opisthorchiasis (infected), and from healthy persons (non-infected).

Statistical indices Infected (144) Non-infected (110)
OD IE OD IE
Mean 1.22 86.5 0.128 9.03
SD 0.385 39.4 0.061 3.99
p50 1.19 72.6 0.122 8.61
p25 0.937 58.2 0.085 6.33
p75 1.51 108 0.157 10.9
Minimum 0.341 18 0.021 1.51
Maximum 2. 29 171 0.349 25.7

Figure 1. The receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve.

Figure 1

The ROC curve was built for 110 sera from healthy blood donors and 144 sera from people with confirmed opisthorchiasis. The area under the ROC curve (accuracy) was determined for the ELISA index (IE), expressed as percentage of positivity (see text), and for the OD mean of duplicates, yielding 0.999 in both cases.

The diagnostic specificity and sensitivity of the ELISA, including serum samples from people with other parasitic or non-parasitic infections, are summarized in Table 2. The sensitivity of the test was 100% (95% CI: 97.45% to 100%) and the specificity dropped to 90.27% (95% CI: 85.63% to 93.80%) with a positive predictive value of 86.75% (95% CI: 80.62–91.50%) and a negative predictive value of 100% (95% CI: 98.19–100%)

Table 2. Diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (cut off 17%, 95% CI) for serum samples from people with a diagnosis of Opisthorchis felineus infection confirmed by the detection of O. felineus eggs in their stool, serum samples from Opisthorchis sp. -free people, and serum samples from people suffering from other parasitic or non-parasitic infections.a .

Opisthorchis infection
ELISA result Infected n Uninfected n Total
Positive True positive 144 False positive 22 166
Negative False negative 0 True negative 204 204
Total 144 226
a

Sensitivity = 100% (95% CI: 97.45–100%), it was calculated as TP/(TP+FN); Specificity = 90.27% (95% CI: 85.63–93.80%), it was calculated as TN/(TN+FP);

c

Positive predictive value = 86.75% (95% CI: 80.62–91.50%), it was calculated as TP/(TP+FP); Negative predictive value = 100% (95% CI: 98.19–100%), it was calculated as TN/(TN+FN). TP, TN, FP, and FN are the numbers of true positives, true negatives, false positives, and false negatives, respectively.

The interassay variability was assessed by calculating the CV with data from eight different working sessions, and did not exceed 10% and 20% for the three positive and the six negative serum samples, respectively (Table 3). Regarding repeatability, no trend was found to increase OD differences between duplicates as their means increase (Figure 2).

Table 3. ELISA reproducibility.

Indices Serum samples
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
IE mean 97 58.6 77.4 4.3 11.9 12.9 10.5 10.5 14.4
SD 4.3 4.8 7.0 0.9 1.8 1.2 1.0 1.3 0.8
CV (%) 5 8.1 9.0 6.5 10.9 10.4 7.9 19.0 6.1

Data from three Opisthorchis-positive (N. 1–3) and six Opisthorchis-negative (N. 4–9) serum samples corresponding to eight different working sessions.

Figure 2. Scatter plot of the differences between the optical density (OD) of the serum duplicates and their means.

Figure 2

OD was recorded at 450 nm.

Discussion

In the field of the diagnosis for human parasitic diseases, there is an urgent need to validate serological tests and to show their performance in terms of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and reproducibility. Ideally, the test results should be combined with other laboratory findings, and with clinical and epidemiological data to provide a reliable diagnosis of the infection. It is necessary to keep in mind that serological methods cannot replace the direct microscopic examination of the stool and the identification of the O. felineus eggs. However, the parasitological diagnosis alone has several drawbacks: 1) only an experienced microscopist can make an accurate diagnosis on fecal samples due to the small egg size (22–32×10–22 µm) and their peculiar morphology; 2) there is a considerable percentage of sero-positive cases identified among Opisthorchis sp. egg-negative individuals with a pauci-symptomatic clinical disease or with a delayed diagnosis [6][8], [32], or patients with a biliary obstruction in whom eggs cannot be recovered in the feces [21]. Consequently, serology is very important for the diagnosis of liver fluke infections [6], [8], [9], [19][21] and may offer help in the follow-up to assess the efficacy of drug treatment as shown by Traverso et al. [6] and Armignacco et al. [8]. Several methods have been used for the serological diagnosis of O. felineus in humans [23], [27], [33], [34]. However, as far as we know, no serological test has been validated using a large panel of sera from people with confirmed opisthorchiasis due to O. felineus, healthy people, or people with health disorders unrelated to opisthorchiasis.

A central point in the validation of a serological test is the determination of the cut-off; therefore, the sample size must be large enough to minimize the stochastic uncertainty in the cut-off selection [29]. Furthermore, positive and negative reference populations should be properly defined. The high sensitivity showed by the developed ELISA (100%, CI 95% CI: 97.40% to 100%), yielding no FN results, can be explained by the use of ESA. This is in agreement with the results of immunolocalization studies which showed that the surface structures of O. felineus stimulate a low B-cell immune response in comparison with the structures of the excretory-secretory system of the parasite and their products, which contain a lot of antigens able to induce a strong B-immune response in humans [35].

On the other hand, ESA affects the test specificity. In fact, the specificity of the developed ELISA dropped to 90.31% (95% CI: 85.69% to 93.82%) when sera from people with other health disorders unrelated to O. felineus are included, since 17 (14.6%) false-positive reactions were detected among them. Moreover, 5 FP were observed among TN sera (Table 2). A main problem in the serological diagnosis of parasitic infections, and especially for those caused by helminths, is the cross-reactivity, in particular when parasite crude extracts (CE) are used. In fact, using CE from adults, metacercarie and eggs, and ESA from adults, some authors have stated that the specificity in the detection of circulating antibodies to O. viverrini is limited by the cross-reactive nature of the antigens [17], [19], [22], [24], [25], [36][41]. This is particularly important in developing countries where people are infected with liver and intestinal flukes, with other helminths, and with protozoa [17]. In the course of C. sinensis infections, the serological diagnosis by ELISA yielded high sensitivity (80%) but low specificity (33.3%) in high risk groups with a history of raw fish consumption. It follows that this diagnostic test is not suitable for epidemiological surveys in developing countries where people are frequently exposed to other parasitic infections [42]. Attempts to obtain more specific O. viverrini antigens have been done by the partial purification of fractions from adult and egg crude extracts as well as from ESA [11], [20], [24], [26], [41].

For O. felineus human infections, information regarding the specificity of serological tests for diagnostic purposes is scarce [9], [12]. “ESA” is a working definition, with an unclear distinction between products actively exported through secretory pathways and those that may be diffused or that may leak from the parasite soma. ESA consists of a number of compounds, including glycans, lipids and enzymes, some of which are shared with other helminths [43]. According to Glupov et al. and Kotelkin et al., ESA components of molecular weight of 105, 74, and 70 Kd may have a potential use for a more specific immunodiagnosis [44], [45]. Recently, a cathepsin B-like cysteine protease belonging to family C1 present in the O. viverrini ESA, has been cloned, expressed, and used in an ELISA to detect specific IgG in sera from persons from an endemic area. This ELISA yielded sensitivity and a specificity of 67% and 81%, respectively [46]. In the present work, the validated ELISA, that used complete ESA, reaches 100% sensibility and 90.31% specificity. The difference in specificity between our ELISA and that developed by Sripa et al. could be due to the two target populations characterized by a high prevalence for liver and intestinal flukes in Thailand and by the absence of trematode infections in most of the Italian territory [46].

In the developed ELISA, more than 95% of the differences between OD values of serum duplicates are less than two standard deviations; it follows that the ability to reproduce ELISA is high [31]. Furthermore, the interassay variability test, based on data from four sera in eight working sessions, was only 10% for the positive sera and did not exceed 20% for the negative sera, indicating a good reproducibility of the ELISA (Table 3).

The validated ELISA shows an excellent performance in terms of sensitivity, repeatability, and reproducibility, and an acceptable specificity. Therefore, we conclude that the method is suitable for detecting anti-O. felineus antibodies in human sera, mainly for diagnostic purposes in association with epidemiological and clinical data.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to O. Armignacco and F. Ferri who provided us most of the serum samples from persons with opisthorchiasis. We are also grateful to Z. Bisoffi, L. Di Matteo, S. Gatti, A. Kern, G. Luzi, and S. Mascoma who provided us serum samples from people with other parasitic infections. We are also indebted to G. Marucci for his technical support to infect laboratory animals and to S. M. Cacciò for the revision of the manuscript.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the European Commission, contract DG SANCO/EURLP 2012. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1. Keiser J, Utzinger J (2009) Food-Borne Trematodiasis. Clin Microbiol Rev 22: 466–483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Pozio E, Armignacco O, Ferri F, Gómez-Morales MA (2013) Opisthorchis felineus an emerging infection in Italy and its implication for the European Union. Acta Tropica 126: 54–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Rivolta S (1884) Sopra una specie di Distoma nel gatto e nel cane. Giornale di Anatomia Fisiologica e Patologia degli Animali 16: 20–28. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Perroncito E (1901) I parassiti dell'uomo e degli animali utili e le più comuni malattie da essi prodotte. Milan: Dottor Francesco Vallardi ed.: 400p.
  • 5. Crotti D, D'Annibale ML, Crotti S (2007) Opistorchiasi autoctona del Lago Trasimeno (Perugia): descrizione di due episodi epidemici da Opisthorchis felineus e problematiche diagnostiche differenziali. Microbiologia Medica 42: 36–41. [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Traverso A, Repetto E, Magnani S, Meloni T, Natrella M, et al. (2012) A large outbreak of Opisthorchis felineus in Italy suggests that opisthorchiasis develops as a febrile eosinophilic syndrome with cholestasis rather than a hepatitis-like syndrome. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 31: 1089–1093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Armignacco O, Caterini L, Marucci G, Ferri F, Bernardini G, et al. (2008) Human illnesses caused by Opisthorchis felineus flukes, Italy. Emerg Infect Dis 14: 1902–1905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Armignacco O, Ferri F, Caterini L, Gomez Morales MA, Pozio E (2013) Cryptic and asymptomatic opisthorchiasis. Am J Trop Med Hyg 88: 364–366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Mordvinov VA, Yurlova NI, Ogorodova LM, Katokhin AV (2012) Opisthorchis felineus and Metorchis bilis are the main agents of liver fluke infection of humans in Russia. Parasitol Int 61: 25–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Sripa B, Kaewkes S, Sithithaworn P, Mairiang E, Laha T, et al. (2007) Liver fluke induces cholangiocarcinoma. PLoS Med 4: 201e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Sripa B, Bethony JM, Sithithaworn P, Kaewkes S, Mairiang E, et al. (2011) Opisthorchiasis and Opisthorchis-associated cholangiocarcinoma in Thailand and Laos. Acta Trop 120: 158–168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Yossepowitch O, Gotesman T, Assous M, Marva E, Zimlichman R, et al. (2004) Opisthorchiasis from imported raw fish. Emerg Infect Dis 10: 2122–2126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Johansen MV, Sithithaworn P, Bergquist R, Utzinger J (2010) Towards improved diagnosis of zoonotic trematode infections in Southeast Asia. Adv Parasitol 73: 171–195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Sripa B, Hong ST (2010) Tribendimidine: an alternative anthelmintic for liver flukes? Lancet Infect Dis 11: 77–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Elkins DB, Sithithaworn P, Haswell-Elkins M, Kaewkes S, Awacharagan P, et al. (1991) Opisthorchis viverrini: relationships between egg counts, worms recovered and antibody levels within an endemic community in northeast Thailand. Parasitology 102: 283–288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Haswell-Elkins MR, Sithithaworn P, Mairiang E, Elkins DB, Wongratanacheewin S, et al. (1991) Immune responsiveness and parasite-specific antibody levels in human hepatobiliary disease associated with Opisthorchis viverrini infection. Clin ExpImmunol 84: 213–218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Sawangsoda P, Sithithaworn J, Tesana S, Pinlaor S, Boonmars T, et al. (2012) Diagnostic values of parasite-specific antibody detections in saliva and urine in comparison with serum in opisthorchiasis. Parasitol Int 61: 196–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Tesana S, Srisawangwong T, Sithithaworn P, Itoh M, Phumchaiyothin R (2007) The ELISA-based detection of anti-Opisthorchis viverrini IgG and IgG4 in samples of human urine and serum from an endemic area of north-eastern Thailand. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 101: 585–591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Srivatanakul P, Viyanant V, Kurathong S, Tiwawech D (1985) Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of Opisthorchis viverrini infection. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 16: 234–239. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Sripa B, Kaewkes S (2000) Relationship between parasite-specific antibody responses and intensity of Opisthorchis viverrini infection in hamsters. Parasite Immunol 22: 139–145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Upatham ES, Viyanant V (2003) Opisthorchis viverrini and opisthorchiasis: a historical review and future perspective. Acta Trop 88: 171–176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Wongratanacheewin S, Bunnag D, Vaeusorn N, Sirisinha S (1988) Characterization of humoral immune response in the serum and bile of patients with opisthorchiasis and its application in immunodiagnosis. Am J Trop Med Hyg 8: 356–362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Wongratanacheewin S, Sermswan RW, Sirisinha S (2003) Immunology and molecular biology of Opisthorchis viverrini infection. Acta Trop 88: 195–207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Poopyruchpong N, Viyanant V, Upatham ES, Srivatanakul P (1990) Diagnosis of opisthorchiasis by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using partially purified antigens. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol 8: 27–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Poopyruchpong N, Viyanant V, Upatham ES, Srivatanakul P (1990) Diagnosis of opisthorchiasis by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using partially purified antigens. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol 8: 27–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Poopyruchpong N, Viyanant V, Upatham ES, Srivatanakul P (1990) Diagnosis of opisthorchiasis by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using partially purified antigens. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol 8: 27–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Meniavtseva TA, Ratner GM, Struchkova SV, Kolmakova MV, Stepanova TF, et al. (1996) Immunoenzyme analysis in the diagnosis of opisthorchiasis. I. The development of an immunoenzyme method for determining IgM antibodies to the Opisthorchis antigen. Med Parazitol 65: 41–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. Official Journal of the European Union 2010 276/33.
  • 29.Sergeant ESG (2012) Epitools epidemiological calculators. AusVet Animal Health Services and Australian Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre for Emerging Infectious Disease. Available: http://epitools.ausvet.com.au.
  • 30. Zweig MH, Campbell G (1993) Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin Chem 39: 561–577. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1: 307–310. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Sithithaworn P, Tesana S, Pipitgool V, Kaewkes S, Thaiklar K, et al. (1991) Quantitative post-mortem study of Opisthorchis viverrini in man in north-east Thailand. Trans R Soc Trop Me Hyg 85: 765–768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Klebanovskaia IA, Gorchakov VV (1981) Indirect hemagglutination reaction in the diagnosis of the early phase of opisthorchiasis. I. A method of isolating erythrocyte samples and the results of their diagnostic use in experimental opisthorchiasis in golden hamsters. Med Parazitol 50: 20–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Klebanovskaia IA (1985) Indirect hemagglutination reaction in the diagnosis of the early phase of opisthorchiasis. An economic method of obtaining a dried, erythrocyte opisthorchid antigenic diagnostic agent. Med Parazitol 54: 25–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Kotelkin AT, Kolesnikova LV, Riabchikova EI, Loktev VB (2001) Localization of immunodominant antigens of the liver fluke Opisthorchis felineus by immunoelectron microscopy. Vestn Ross Akad Med Nauk 3: 34–39. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Amornpunt S, Sarasombath S, Sirisinha S (1991) Production and characterization of monoclonal antibodies against the excretory-secretory antigen of the liver fluke (Opisthorchis viverrini). Int J Parasitol 21: 421–428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Sirisinha S, Chawengkirttikul R, Sermswan R (1991) Immunodiagnosis of opisthorchiasis. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 22: 179–183. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Sirisinha S, Chawengkirttikul R, Tayapiwatana C, Naiyanetr C, Waikagul J, et al. (1992) Specific and cross-reactive monoclonal antibodies to the 89-kDa antigen of Opisthorchis viverrini . Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 23: 489–490. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Sirisinha S, Chawengkirttikul R, Haswell-Elkins MR, Elkins DB, Kaewkes S, et al. (1995) Evaluation of a monoclonal antibody-based enzyme linked immunosorbent assay for the diagnosis of Opisthorchis viverrini infection in an endemic area. Am J Trop Med Hyg 52: 521–524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Akai PS, Pungpak S, Chaicumpa W, Kitikoon V, Ruangkunaporn Y, et al. (1995) Serum antibody responses in opisthorchiasis. Int J Parasitol 25: 971–973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Wongsaroj T, Sakolvaree Y, Chaicumpa W, Maleewong W, Kitikoon V, et al. (2001) Affinity purified oval antigen for diagnosis of Opisthorchiasis viverrini . Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol 19: 245–258. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Kim YJ, Lee SM, Choi GE, Hwang SH, Kim HH, et al. (2010) Performance of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of Clonorchis sinensis infestation in high- and low-risk groups. J Clin Microbiol 48: 2365–2367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Hewitson JP, Grainger JR, Maizels RM (2009) Helminth immunoregulatiobn: the role of parasite secreted proteins in modulating host immunity. Mol Biochem Parasitol 167: 1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Glupov VV, Khokhlova NI, Khvoshchevskaia MF, Vodianitskaia SN, Iurlova NI (1997) The use of immunoblotting for studying Opisthorchis felineus (Rivolta, 1884) antigens. Med Parazitol 66: 17–19. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Kotelkin AT, Razumov IA, Pokrovskiî I V, Loktev VB (1997) A comparative study of the somatic, excretory-secretory and egg antigens of Opisthorchis felineus . Med Parazitol 1: 12–16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Sripa J, Brindley PJ, Sripa B, Loukas A, Kaewkes S, et al. (2012) Evaluation of liver fluke recombinant cathepsin B-1 protease as a serodiagnostic antigen for human opisthorchiasis. Parasitol Int 61: 191–195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES