Sir,
We thank Dr Kermani et al1 for their interest in our article.
In response to their comments on our report2 we acknowledge the inadvertent omission of two recent articles,3, 4 both of which emphasise the occurrence of CRP-negative disease seen in giant cell arteritis (GCA). Our case is clearly described as ‘CRP-negative disease', and in addition to this we review inflammatory-marker-negative disease in GCA, as it is appropriate and informative in this context.
The threshold for an abnormal CRP result is ill defined. Indeed various receiver operating characteristic curves for CRP have been published, illustrating the trade-off of sensitivity and specificity at various threshold settings. Also, different laboratories express the parameter as either mg/l or mg/dl, which can be a source of confusion in clinical practice. Hayreh et al5 use a level <24.5 mg/l (2.45 mg/dl) as a cut-off for normal in the context of GCA.
References
- Kermani TA, Warrington KJ. Comment on: How common is inflammatory marker-negative disease in giant cell arteritis. Eye. 2013;27:677–678. doi: 10.1038/eye.2013.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Levy SL, Bull AD, Nestel AR. How common is inflammatory marker-negative disease in giant cell arteritis. Eye. 2013;27 (1:106–108. doi: 10.1038/eye.2012.223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Walvick MD, Walvick MP. Giant cell arteritis: laboratory predictors of a positive temporal artery biopsy. Ophthalmology. 2011;118 (6:1201–1204. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kermani TA, Schmidt J, Crowson CS, Ytterberg SR, Hunder GG, Matteson EL, et al. Utility of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2012;41 (6:866–871. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2011.10.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hayreh SS, Podhajsky PA, Raman R, Zimmerman B. Giant cell arteritis: validity and reliability of various diagnostic criteria. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997;123 (3:285–296. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)70123-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]