Abstract
Like embryonic stem (ES) cells, human induced pluripotent stem (hiPS) cells can differentiate into neuronal cells. However, it is unclear how their exquisite neuronal function is electrophysiologically coordinated during differentiation and whether they are functionally identical to human ES cell-derived neurons. In this study, we differentiated hiPS and ES cells into pyramidal-like neurons and conducted electrophysiological characterization over the 4-week terminal differentiation period. The human neuron-like cells express forebrain pyramidal cell markers NeuN, neurofilament, the microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP2), the paired box protein Pax-6 (PAX6), Tuj1, and the forkhead box protein G1 (FoxG1). The size of developing neurons increased continuously during the 4-week culture, and cell-resting membrane potentials (RMPs) underwent a negative shift from −40 to −70 mV. Expression of the muscarinic receptor-modulated K+ currents (IM) participated in the development of cell RMPs and controlled excitability. Immature neurons at week 1 could only fire abortive action potentials (APs) and the frequency of AP firing progressively increased with neuronal maturation. Interestingly, the developmental change of voltage-gated Na+ current (INa) did not correlate with the change in the AP firing frequency. On the other hand, the transient outward K+ current (IA), but not the delayed rectifier current (IK) contributed to the high frequency firing of APs. Synaptic activities were observed throughout the 4-week development. These morphological and electrophysiological features were almost identical between iPS and ES cell-derived neurons. This is the first systematic investigation showing functional evidence that hiPS cell-derived neurons possess similar neuronal activities as ES cell-derived neurons. These data support that iPS cell-derived neural progenitor cells have the potential for replacing lost neurons in cell-based therapy.
Introduction
Embryonic stem (ES) cells are well known for their pluripotent differentiation capacity. They can develop into diverse specialized cells, including neuronal cells, and thus have promising applications in basic developmental biology, drug discovery, disease therapies, and regenerative medicine. The translational application of human ES cells into treating diseases, however, has encountered several ethical concerns and possible immune rejection after transplantation [1]. To circumvent concerns related to the implementations of human ES cell technology, human induced pluripotent stem (hiPS) cells were generated from human somatic cells [2]. Adult somatic cells were reprogrammed into ES cell-like state by introducing crucial pluripotency genes that allow them to differentiate into different cell types. The promise offered by the hiPS cell technology has huge clinical potential for transplantation therapy without incurring the ethical controversy associated with ES cells. Neuronal differentiation of iPS cells provides a powerful new approach to study neurodevelopment, disease models, and develop new treatments for nervous system disorders. Before practical applications become reality, however, more effort is needed to thoroughly examine these converted adult cells for safety concerns as well as to better understand their competence in cell replacement therapy. To do so, a practical and reliable approach is to compare the differentiation properties of the hiPS cells with that of ES cells. So far, there have been few comparative examinations to determine differences between human iPS cells and ES cells with regard to pluripotency, gene expression, and the functional phenotypes of neurally induced cells.
A recent report demonstrated that hiPS cells differentiated into neural cells under the same conditions used for human ES cells, but with reduced efficiency and variable potency between cell lines [3]. In the forebrain, mature pyramidal neurons are highly differentiated cellular elements in the nervous system, with complicated function determined by a specific spatiotemporal assembly of Na+, K+, and Ca2+ channels [4–6]. They are excitable cells with resting membrane potential (RMP) from −60 to −70 mV, and able to fire repetitive action potentials (APs) when receiving a stimulating input strong enough to activate the fast inactivating inward Na+ currents (INa) [7,8]. The firing pattern of APs is under strict control of K+ channel activities [9]. Among the many voltage-gated K+ channels, the muscarinic receptor-coupled K+ channels or KCNQ2/3 channels are activated in the membrane potential range near the threshold of evoking APs. The M-current (IM) acts like a brake to maintain the membrane potential below the threshold for voltage-gated Na+ channel activation, thereby controlling neuronal excitability [10]. The transient A-type K+ currents (IA) counteract the activation of INa, keeping the single AP short and helping neurons fire a repetitive pattern of APs [11]. The delayed rectifier K+ currents (IK) are responsible for cell membrane potential discharge and repolarization upon and after AP activation [12]. Different firing activities generate diverse AP propagation patterns, thus leading to a sophisticated neuronal signal coding and transmitter release. Although neuronal differentiation of hiPS cells has been demonstrated, whether differentiated cells derived from iPS cells can behave like mature neurons with exquisite coordination between voltage-gated Na+ and K+ channels capable of firing repetitive APs has been obscure. Such an evaluation is particularly important to determine whether hiPS cells can functionally replace human ES cells, and whether they are suitable for developmental and translational research as well as clinical applications.
Recently, we developed a feeder-free neuronal differentiation method to induce human ES and iPS cells into neural progenitor cells, and then into maturing pyramidal-like neurons over the ensuing 4 weeks. In the present study, we characterized the morphological and functional development of the pyramidal-like neurons derived from hiPS cells along the 4-week differentiation. We deciphered the key relationship between the AP firing patterns and the developmental changes in voltage-gated Na+ and K+ currents in hiPS cells, and compared them to neuronal features of cells differentiated from human ES cells.
Materials and Methods
Cell culture and neuronal differentiation of hiPS and ES cells
Human H1 ES cells (WiCell) and vector-free hiPS cells (iPS-DF19-9/7T, WiCell Research Institute) were routinely cultured on hES-qualified Matrigel (BD Biosciences) in a serum-free and feeder-free mTeSR medium (Stem Cell Technologies). The cells used for differentiation were no older than passages 35–55. Cells were passaged using dispase every 5 to 7 days after manual removal of differentiated colonies. For more information on the maintenance of hiPS cells with mTeSR1, please refer to the guidelines published by Stem Cell Technologies (www.stemcell.com//en/Products/Popular-Product-Lines/mTeSR-TeSR2.aspx).
Neural induction was achieved through a modification of the protocol described in Chambers et al. and our earlier report [13,14] using dorsomorphin and SB431542. Cells were dissociated using accutase (Invitrogen) for 15 min, and then plated as single cells on Matrigel-coated plates (BD Biosciences) at a density of 18,000–20,000 cells/cm2 in mouse embryonic fibroblast-conditioned media supplemented with the 10 ng/mL basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF; R&D System) and 10 μM ROCK inhibitor (Y27632; Sigma-Aldrich Corp.). Three to five days later, cells were confluent and the medium was changed to the knockout serum replacement (KSR) medium containing the knockout Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM), 15% KSR, 1% l-glutamine, 1% nonessential amino acids, and beta-mercaptoethanol supplemented with 3 μM dorsomorphin (Tocris) and 10 μM SB431542 (a transforming growth factor-β inhibitor; Stemgent). This is considered day 0 in the differentiation protocol and cells were then allowed to grow for 5 days. The medium was then changed to a 1:4 mixture of the N2 medium (DMEM/F12, N2 supplement, l-glutamine) and KSR medium, with dorsomorphin, but without SB431542. The proportion of the N2 medium was gradually increased to 50% on day 7 and 75% on day 9. On day 11, cells were dissociated with accutase, resuspended in the N2 medium, and cultured onto Matrigel-coated culture dishes with a 1:1 mixture of the N2 and B27 medium (the Neurobasal medium, B27 supplement, and l-glutamine) with 10 ng/mL of the bFGF for terminal differentiation. Media was changed every 3 days for 4 weeks.
Neuronal differentiation of mouse iPS and ES cells
Mouse primary iPS cells (WP5) were purchased from Stemgent. Mouse ES cells were prepared from stocks of the wild-type D3 ES cell line. Cells were cultured and differentiated as previously described [15]. Briefly, undifferentiated cells were maintained in T25 flasks in ES cell growth media (ESGM) consisting of the DMEM, supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 10% newborn calf serum, 8 μg/mL adenosine, 8.5 μg/mL guanosine, 7.3 μg/mL cytidine, 7.3 μg/mL uridine, 2.4 μg/mL thymidine, the leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) at 1,000 units/mL, and 0.1 mM β-mercaptoethanol. For induction of neural differentiation, one quarter of the cells from a T25 flask were seeded into a standard 100-mm bacterial Petri dish in ESGM lacking LIF and β-mercaptoethanol (ES cell induction media, [ESIM]). After 2 days, the media and cell aggregates were removed from the dish and the aggregated cells were allowed to settle for 10 min in a 15-mL centrifuge tube. The media was then aspirated and replaced. Cells were then returned to the culture dish for an additional 2 days. The culture media was then replaced with ESIM containing 5×10−7 M retinoic acid (RA) (all-trans RA, Sigma-aldrich), and the cells were cultured for an additional 4 days.
Immunocytochemistry
Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min at room temperature, postfixed with a 2:1 mixture of ethanol:acetic acid, permeabilized with 0.2% Triton-X-100, and blocked with 1% fish gelatin for 1 h. Primary antibodies (diluted to 1/500 or 1/1,000) against PAX6, Tuj1 (Covance), NeuN, neurofilament (NF) (EMD Millipore Corporation), FoxG1 (Abcam), and MAP2 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) were applied overnight at 4°C. The next day, cells were washed 3 times in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and incubated with secondary Cy3- or fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated antibodies in PBS for 1 h. Hoechst 33342 (1 μg/mL; Molecular Probes) was added to stain cell nuclei. Images were visualized by fluorescence microscopy (BX61; Olympus).
Electrophysiological recordings
Whole-cell recording was performed on human ES and iPS cell-derived neurons using an EPC9 amplifier (HEKA; Elektronik) at 21°C–23°C. The external solution contained (in mM) 135 NaCl, 5 KCl, 1 MgCl2, 2 CaCl2, 10 HEPES, and 10 Glucose at a pH of 7.4. Recording electrodes pulled from borosilicate glass pipettes (Sutter Instrument) had a tip resistance between 5 to 8 MΩ when filled with the internal solution (in mM): 140 KCl, 2 MgCl2, 1 CaCl2, 2 Na2ATP, 10 EGTA, and 10 HEPES at a pH of 7.2. Series resistance was compensated by 60%–80%. Linear leak and residual capacitance currents were subtracted on-line using a P/6 protocol. APs were recorded under the current-clamp mode using Pulse software (HEKA, Elektronik). Miniature excitatory or inhibitory postsynaptic currents (mE/IPSCs) were recorded under the voltage-clamp mode in the presence of tetrodotoxin (TTX, 1 μM). To record voltage-gated K+ IA and IK currents, TTX (1 μM) and CdCl2 (100 μM) were added into the external solution to suppress voltage-gated Na+ and Ca2+ currents. To record pure INa, 140 mM KCl in the internal solution was replaced with 120 mM CsCl and 20 mM tetraethylammonium-chloride (TEA-Cl), and 100 μM CdCl2 was added into the external solution. When recording voltage-gated Ca2+ currents, the internal solution for INa recordings was used, while 1 μM TTX was added into the external solution to block Na+ currents. Data were filtered at 3 kHz and digitized at sampling rates of 20 kHz. The AP amplitude was measured from the initial threshold to the peak of the AP upstroke. The peak amplitude of INa evoked by a 0 mV voltage command was used for data analysis. The size of the M-type K+ current (IM) was determined by measuring the amplitude of the deactivating current induced by a 20 mV hyperpolarization step (from −30 to −50 mV). We measured the amplitude of the delayed rectifier (IK) current at the end of a 40 mV depolarization. The amplitude of the fast inactivating K+ current IA was determined by measuring the peak component elicited by stepping from −120 to 0 mV. We measured the maximum amplitude of high-voltage-activated (HVA) Ca2+ currents elicited by the 0 mV voltage command.
Statistical analysis
All electrophysiological data in this study are expressed as mean±SEM. Statistical comparisons between correlated groups were assessed by the Student's t-test. A comparison among the 3 groups was analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by a post hoc Tukey's test.
Results
HiPS cell-derived neurons express forebrain makers
After 4-week neuronal differentiation, neuronal antibody markers were used to stain differentiated cells derived from hiPS and ES cells. Immunocytochemical staining showed expression of the NF, neuron-specific class III beta-tubulin (Tuj 1), and the mature neuronal maker neuronal nuclear antigen (NeuN) (Fig. 1). Most cells expressed the forebrain pyramidal cell markers MAP2, PAX6, and FoxG1. Identical to a previous report [16], the transcriptional factor FoxG1 is in the cytoplasm of differentiated neurons (Fig. 1). Positive staining indicates that the differentiation protocol converted hiPS and ES cells into neurons expressing specific forebrain markers.
Developmental changes of the RMPs and evoked APs
Over the 4-week differentiation and maturation of neural progenitor cells, we characterized the electrophysiological properties of these cells derived from hiPS and ES cells by measuring cell capacitance, RMP, and evoked APs. In whole-cell patch clamp recording of hiPS cell-derived neurons, the cell size determined by capacitance measurement progressively increased from an average of 12.0±6.1 pF (n=10) at week 1 to 30.1±5.2 pF (n=18 cells per groups; P<0.05) by week 4 (Fig. 2A). The RMP steadily shifted from a relatively depolarized level of −40 mV in week 1 cells to the mature hyperpolarized level around −70 mV after 3- to 4-week differentiation (Fig. 2A). Human ES cell-derived neurons underwent the same developmental changes in cell capacitance and RMPs (Fig. 2B).
The ability to fire a train of repetitive APs upon membrane depolarization is a unique functional feature of mature neurons. To test the firing ability and firing pattern of differentiating cells, a 30 pA depolarization current of 1 s duration was injected into cells under whole-cell current clamp recording. For cells undergoing 1- to 4-week differentiation, we obtained 4 different firing types of APs (Fig. 2C and Table 1). These include (1) cells that fired abortive APs with a small amplitude and slow upstroke slope, (2) cells that fired only a single AP during the 1 s depolarization although the spike was large and sharp, (3) cells that fired <10 normal sharp APs, and (4) cells that fired repetitive normal APs over the 1 s depolarization (Fig. 2C). Importantly, the cells in the last group fired spikes without amplitude run-down. Early at week 1 of differentiation, all (100%) cells derived from hiPS and ES cells fired only abortive APs. At week 2, abortive APs disappeared and most of the cells (66.7% in hiPS cell cultures and 100% in human ES cell cultures) fired single APs (Table 2). At this time, some hiPS cell-derived neuron-like cells fired multiple (22.2% of total) and repetitive APs (11.1% of total). At week 3, some human ES cells began to fire multiple (16.7%) and repetitive APs (11.1%). Meanwhile, 27.3% and 18.2% of iPS cell-derived neurons could fire multiple and repetitive APs, respectively. After 4-week differentiation, nearly half (44.5%) the iPS cell-derived neurons fired repetitive APs, while 23.5% of ES cell-derived neurons had a similar ability. These data suggest a progressive maturation of APs and functional development in hiPS cell-derived and ES cell-derived neurons.
Table 1.
AP type | Peak amplitude (mV) | Upstroke slope (mV/ms) | ½ AP width (ms) | Firing frequency (Hz) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Abortive APs | 38.78±10.23# | 6.03±1.75# | 11.71±3.54* | 1 |
Single APs | 65.28±7.86 | 18.49±2.90 | 7.47±1.03 | 1 |
Multiple APs | 61.29±5.36 | 14.93±6.81 | 10.56±4.76 | 4.00±1.53 |
Repetitive APs | 63.09±3.26 | 22.59±3.15§ | 6.16±1.41§ | 15.44±2.35 |
P<0.01, abortive APs compared to the 3 other AP types. *P<0.01, abortive APs compared to single and repetitive APs. §P<0.05, repetitive APs compared to single and multiple APs. Mean±SEM. n=16–34 cells in each group.
APs, action potentials; iPS, induced pluripotent stem; ES, embryonic stem.
Table 2.
|
Human iPS cells |
Human ES cells |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AP types | 1 w | 2 w | 3 w | 4 w | 1 w | 2 w | 3 w | 4 w |
Abortive APs | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Single APs | 0 | 66.7 | 54.5 | 22.2 | 0 | 100 | 72.2 | 58.8 |
Multiple APs | 0 | 22.2 | 27.3 | 33.3 | 0 | 0 | 16.7 | 17.6 |
Repetitive APs | 0 | 11.1 | 18.2 | 44.5 | 0 | 0 | 11.1 | 23.5 |
“w” stands for week.
Developmental changes of the inward Na+ currents (INa)
The amplitude of APs is determined by the population opening of voltage-gated Na+ channels, we therefore characterized the developmental changes of INa over the 4-week neuronal differentiation. In hiPS cell-derived neurons at week 2 of differentiation, depolarizing voltage steps were applied in the presence of Cs+, TEA, and Cd2+ in the bath solution to block voltage-gated K+ and Ca2+ currents (Fig. 3A). The evoked inward INa was confirmed by its sensitivity to the blocking action of 1 μM TTX and the current–voltage (I-V) relationship revealed by voltage steps from the holding potential of −70 mV up to +60 mV in 10 mV increments (Fig. 3B). In hiPS cell-derived neurons, the averaged amplitude of INa was small at week 1, and then markedly doubled in size at week 2, but did not show any significant difference at weeks 2, 3, and 4 (Fig. 3C). The averaged amplitude of INa was small in neurons firing abortive APs, while much larger INa was seen in neurons firing single, multiple, and repetitive APs (Fig. 3D). The same developmental change of INa was also observed in human ES-cell derived neurons over the 4-week cultures (Fig. 3E and 3F). This observation suggested that although a sufficient voltage-gated Na+ channel activity was essential for firing a normal AP, the firing pattern of APs was not determined by the amplitude of Na+ currents.
M-type K+ currents (IM) during neuronal differentiation
The M-current (IM) controls the excitability of neurons via maintaining the membrane potential below the threshold for the activation of voltage-gated Na+ channels [10]. We next characterized IM in the hiPS and ES cell-derived neurons during the 4-week neuronal differentiation. In whole-cell recording, cells were held at −70 mV and a −30 mV prepulse was used to activate IM, followed by deactivation of hyperpolarizing pulses from −40 to −90 mV in the presence of TTX (1 μM). The size of IM was determined by measuring the amplitude of the deactivation current upon a 20-mV hyperpolarization step (from −30 to −50 mV). The current was sensitive to the inhibitory action of the IM blocker 10,10-bis(4-pyridinylmethyl)-9(10H)-anthracenone (XE991) (Fig. 4A). We also tested the inhibitory effect of bath applied muscarinic receptor agonist acetylcholine chloride (ACh-Cl) on the current (Fig. 4B). After 1 week into neuronal differentiation, the amplitude of IM was small in hiPS cell-derived neurons. The current then gradually increased over the ensuing 2–4-week differentiation period (Fig. 4C). The same developmental change of IM was also observed in human ES cell-derived neurons (Fig. 4D). One important action of IM is to suppress spontaneous AP firing in mature neurons. Consistently, whole-cell current clamp recordings showed that very few spontaneous APs were observed in hiPS and ES cell-derived neurons at the ages of 3–4-week differentiation (Fig. 4E and 4F). This low-spontaneous activity likely results from the robust activity of IM in these cells. Supporting this speculation, in mouse iPS and ES cell-derived neurons differentiated for 8–10 days, the amplitude of IM was very low and a much higher percentage of the neuron-like cells (∼50% of total) showed spontaneous firing of APs (Fig. 4G and H).
Delayed rectifier (IK) and transient A-type (IA) K+ currents in the developing neurons
The delayed rectifier IK and the fast inactivating IA currents are 2 other K+ currents that can control the firing pattern of APs via repolarizing the membrane potential during and soon after APs. In whole-cell recordings on hiPS cell-derived neuron-like cells, the cell membrane potential was held at −70 mV, and IK was elicited by voltage commands from −60 to +60 mV with 20 mV increments in the presence of TTX (1 μM) and Cd2+ (100 μM). The currents showed a relatively slow activating and inactivating property upon the on and off phase of the voltage command. The current kinetics and its sensitivity to TEA block were consistent with a delayed rectifier current (Fig. 5A). IK could be recorded in all examined cells undergoing 1- to 4-week differentiation. On the other hand, the transient IA current was commonly seen only in cells during the late stages (3–4 weeks) of neuronal differentiation. After a hyperpolarizing prepulse of −110 mV, IA was elicited by voltage steps from −60 to +60 mV with 20 mV increments. Different from the sustained IK current, IA displayed fast activating and inactivating kinetics. The peak IA current was suppressed by bath application of 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) (Fig. 5B).
We next analyzed the amplitude of IK and IA in these cells along the 4-week differentiation. In hiPS cell-derived neuron-like cells, the averaged size of IK gradually increased from 1 to 3 weeks, and then remained unchanged at week 4 (Fig. 5C). Because the cell size underwent continuous increase over the 4-week differentiation, we calculated the current density of IK and observed no difference in the IK current density between week 1 and 2. The current density, however, was significantly decreased over the ensuing weeks 3 and 4 (Fig. 5C). On the other hand, the transient IA current was rarely obtained at week 1. In the following weeks, IA showed a dramatic increase in amplitude as well as in its current density (Fig. 5D). Similar developmental changes in the IK and IA amplitude and current density were also observed in human ES cell-derived neuronal cells (Fig. 5E, 5F).
Increased IA currents played a major role in regulating the firing pattern of APs in differentiated neurons
Functional expression of transient IA channels was almost absent in immature neurons firing abortive and single APs (Fig. 6A, 6B and 6E) and large IA currents were regularly seen in mature neurons that fired multiple and repetitive APs (Fig. 6C, 6D and 6E). Similar changes were found in human ES cell-derived neurons (Fig. 6F). These data suggest that the transient current IA rather than the sustained current IK plays an important role in shaping the AP firing pattern. Supporting this idea, blocking the IA current using 4-AP (5 mM) in neurons firing repetitive APs effectively reduced the AP firing frequency and elongated the half width of APs (Fig. 7A, 7B).
The experimental evidences from mouse iPS and ES cells also support this conclusion. Mouse iPS and ES cell-derived neuroepithelial cells differentiated into mature neurons within 8–10 days. The sustained K+ current IK was present in all mouse iPS and ES cell-derived neurons expressing single and multiple APs. The current density of IK did not show significant differences between neurons firing single and multiple APs. In those neurons firing a single AP, the transient current IA was very small (Fig. 8A and 8B). In neurons firing multiple APs, the IA current markedly increased (Fig. 8C and 8D). The current density of IA in neurons expressing multiple APs was much higher than those with a single AP (Fig. 8E and 8F).
Voltage-gated Ca2+ currents and spontaneous synaptic activity in the developing neurons
Ca2+ plays important roles in a variety of signal transduction pathways and neuronal functions. The typical role of Ca2+ entry is to trigger the release of neurotransmitters from the presynapse into the synaptic cleft. In our study, 100 μM CdCl2 was used to block voltage-gated Ca2+ channels when voltage-gated Na+ and K+ currents were recorded. To record HVA Ca2+ currents, cells were held at −70 mV, and then a series of voltage steps from −60 to +60 mV in 20 mV increments were applied in the presence of TTX, Cs+, and TEA. In hiPS cell-derived neurons, CdCl2-sensitive HVA Ca2+ currents were observed (Fig. 9A and 9B). The HVA Ca2+ currents were low at week 1, and then gradually increased over the following weeks (Fig. 9C). The expression of HVA Ca2+ currents in human ES cell-derived neurons also underwent the same developmental changes over the 4-week differentiation (Fig. 9D).
Spontaneous neurotransmitter release occurs in the absence of APs and usually can be obtained in the presence of TTX. To detect the synaptic function of the developing neurons, we recorded miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents (mEPSCs) at a holding potential of −80 mV in hiPS and ES cell-derived neurons. mEPSCs showed inward currents and were suppressed by the α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptor antagonist NBQX (20 μM) (Fig. 9E). The miniature inhibitory postsynaptic currents (mIPSCs) were recorded at a holding potential of 0 mV. This depolarizing command lead to a fluctuation in cell membrane potentials, but we could still record and suppress the outward mIPSCs by using the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor antagonist bicuculline (50 μM) (Fig. 9E). Both mEPSCs and mIPSCs can be observed throughout the 4-week differentiation of hiPS and ES cells.
Discussion
In the present investigation, we characterized the developmental changes in the electrophysiological features of neuron-like cells derived from hiPS and ES cells. After the 4-week terminal differentiation, these cells stably express specific forebrain pyramidal neuronal makers, including NeuN, NF, MAP2, Tuj1, PAX6, and FoxG1. Over the period of differentiation, the cell size increased continuously and the RMP showed a negative shift toward −70 mV. We identified that IM contributes to the development of cell RMPs and neuronal excitability. The firing patterns of APs were progressively converted from the abortive to the repetitive type, and the size of sharp APs increased with maturation of differentiated neurons. Interestingly, we noticed that the developmental changes in the amplitude of INa did not correlate with the firing patterns of APs. The transient A-type K+ current IA rather than the sustained current IK was a key regulator for the functional activity of maturing APs. The functional synaptic activity indicated by the spontaneous miniature potentials could be observed in the developing neurons from 1 to 4 weeks.
The neuronal proteins NeuN, NF, and Tuj1 are expressed in most neuronal cells in the nervous system, including the forebrain in vertebrates. NeuN immunoreactivity is extensively used to identify neuronal cells during development and in adult and neurological diseases [17,18]. The NF protein is the major intermediate filament involved in axon growth and stabilization of the axonal cytoskeleton [19,20]. Tuj1 is an important neuronal marker specific for developing and maturing neurons [21]. In the postnatal forebrain, most neurons originate from those Tuj1-positive progenitor cells in the anterior part of the subventricular zone [22,23]. The neuronal cells derived from hiPS and ES cells in this investigation also express MAP2, PAX6, and FoxG1. MAP2 is a forebrain pyramidal cell marker, mainly expressed on dendrites of pyramidal neurons in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus [24,25]. PAX6 is a transcription factor involved in nervous system development [26]. Associated with other transcription factors, PAX6 plays a critical role in determining the fate of neuronal progenitors and controlling the density of cortical neurons in the developing forebrain [27–29]. PAX6 is also used as a pyramidal cell marker based on its indispensable role in the neurogenesis of pyramidal neurons in the forebrain [30,31]. The transcription factor FoxG1 expressed in the forebrain plays an important role in cortical development by regulating progenitor proliferation and neurogenesis [32]. The FoxG1 protein is localized in the nucleus of neuronal progenitors and relocated into the cytoplasm after differentiation [16]. In the intermediate zone of the cortex, dynamic expression of FoxG1 is an essential mechanism for migration of pyramidal neuron progenitors into the cerebral cortex [33]. These histological evidences of positive staining of NeuN, NF, Tuj1, MAP2, PAX6, and FoxG1 strongly indicate that our differentiation method has converted hiPS and ES cells into forebrain pyramidal-like neurons.
The developmental changes in these electrophysiological characters were very similar between iPS cell- and ES cell-derived progenitors and neuron-like cells. The electrophysiological properties of developing neurons derived from hiPS and ES cells also mimic the physiologic maturation of pyramidal neurons in the animal neocortex after birth [34–39]. During the development of the animal neocortex, pyramidal neuron RMPs become more negative, the duration of APs is shortening, and their firing pattern is converted from single to repetitive firing. Meanwhile, the voltage-dependent Na+, K+, and Ca2+ currents undergo specific time-dependent changes [34–39]. Our observation demonstrates that hiPS cells generated from adult cells are capable of differentiating into functional brain neurons via similar physiological processes as those of ES cells.
For neurons, the typical feature of electrophysiological maturation is the ability to fire trains of repetitive sharp APs in response to depolarizing current injection. Immature neurons derived from hiPS and ES cells only showed abortive APs at week 1, most likely resulting from the low expression of INa assessed by the peak amplitude measurement. At week 2, most of the cells fired a large single AP, and the peak amplitude of INa also dramatically increased. When the differentiation entered weeks 3 and 4, maturing neurons were able to fire multiple and repetitive APs. We did not observe a significant amplitude difference among the single, multiple, and repetitive APs, and the averaged amplitude of INa did not show any difference among the neurons firing single, multiple, and repetitive APs. Thus, INa plays a dominant role in the AP amplitude as described in previous reports [40], but not in the evolution of AP firing patterns.
The functional expression of the transient outward K+ current IA plays an imperative role in neuronal maturation leading to repetitive AP firing. The current density of IA markedly increased in a time- and differentiation-dependent manner despite the growing cell size during the 4-week development. This coincides well with the progressively increased ability of cells to fire repetitive APs. Additionally, we show that, in mature neurons, blocking IA effectively reduced the number of APs and increased their half widths. Thus, the temporal expression of IA and its regulation of AP firing patterns in iPS cell-derived pyramidal neurons mimic the same mechanism seen in developing cortical neurons and neurons from human ES cells [11,12,41,42]. In animal pyramidal neurons, IA channels are assembled from α–subunits of the Kv4 and Kv1 family, while IK channels are composed of Kv2 subunits [43–45]. The function and the molecular subunits composition of voltage-gated K+ channels differ greatly in different brain regions and neuronal types. In the hippocampal interneurons and basal ganglia output neurons, IK is encoded by the Kv3 subunit family and required for sustained high-frequency AP generation [46,47]. The contribution of IA rather than IK to AP maturation in hiPS cell-derived neurons fits well with that discovered in neocortical pyramidal neurons.
Our data also show a time-dependent increase of voltage-gated Ca2+ currents in differentiating cells. The HVA Ca2+ channels mediate a rapid Ca2+ entry that triggers AP-evoked neurotransmitter releases [48,49]. This Ca2+ entry, however, is not required for the spontaneous transmitter release in the absence of APs [50,51]. The spontaneous miniature postsynatpic potentials could be obtained in the differentiating cells at the early age of week 1, suggesting that the onset of the synaptic activity appears much earlier than AP generation and neuronal maturation.
Taken together, the present study provides a compelling new evidence to show that hiPS cells, like human ES cells, can be converted into functional pyramidal-like neurons. Our feeder-free neuronal differentiation protocol helps neural progenitors quickly become maturing neurons in 4 weeks. Temporal coordination between voltage-gated Na+ and K+ currents controls functional maturation of these neurons. The morphological features and electrophysiological properties of hiPS cell-derived neurons are very similar to those found in human ES cell-derived neurons. Thus, hiPS cells generated from adult somatic cells maintain the intrinsic properties of human ES cells and are able to form functional neurons. The confirmation of these properties in other hiPS cell lines is important for the development of cell-based therapies using hiPS cells.
Acknowledgment
This work was supported by the NIH grants NS0458710 (SPY), American Heart Association (AHA) Grant-in-Aid 12GRNT12060222 (SPY), and AHA Postdoctoral Fellowship 12POST12080252 (MS). This work was also supported by the NIH grant C06 RR015455 from the Extramural Research Facilities Program of the National Center for Research Resources.
Author Disclosure Statement
There is no commercial association involved in this investigation and no conflict of interests in connection with any author in the submitted manuscripts. No competing financial interests exist in this investigation.
References
- 1.Fischbach GD. Fischbach RL. Stem cells: science, policy, and ethics. J Clin Invest. 2004;114:1364–1370. doi: 10.1172/JCI23549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Takahashi K. Tanabe K. Ohnuki M. Narita M. Ichisaka T. Tomoda K. Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell. 2007;131:861–872. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hu BY. Weick JP. Yu J. Ma LX. Zhang XQ. Thomson JA. Zhang SC. Neural differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells follows developmental principles but with variable potency. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:4335–4340. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0910012107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chen X. Johnston D. Properties of single voltage-dependent K+ channels in dendrites of CA1 pyramidal neurones of rat hippocampus. J Physiol. 2004;559:187–203. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.068114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Storm JF. Potassium currents in hippocampal pyramidal cells. Prog Brain Res. 1990;83:161–187. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6123(08)61248-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bossu JL. Capogna M. Debanne D. McKinney RA. Gahwiler BH. Somatic voltage-gated potassium currents of rat hippocampal pyramidal cells in organotypic slice cultures. J Physiol. 1996;495(Pt 2):367–381. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1996.sp021600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Staff NP. Jung HY. Thiagarajan T. Yao M. Spruston N. Resting and active properties of pyramidal neurons in subiculum and CA1 of rat hippocampus. J Neurophysiol. 2000;84:2398–2408. doi: 10.1152/jn.2000.84.5.2398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tyzio R. Ivanov A. Bernard C. Holmes GL. Ben-Ari Y. Khazipov R. Membrane potential of CA3 hippocampal pyramidal cells during postnatal development. J Neurophysiol. 2003;90:2964–2972. doi: 10.1152/jn.00172.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bean BP. The action potential in mammalian central neurons. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;8:451–465. doi: 10.1038/nrn2148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Delmas P. Brown DA. Pathways modulating neural KCNQ/M (Kv7) potassium channels. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005;6:850–862. doi: 10.1038/nrn1785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kim J. Wei DS. Hoffman DA. Kv4 potassium channel subunits control action potential repolarization and frequency-dependent broadening in rat hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurones. J Physiol. 2005;569:41–57. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.095042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mitterdorfer J. Bean BP. Potassium currents during the action potential of hippocampal CA3 neurons. J Neurosci. 2002;22:10106–10115. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-23-10106.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chambers SM. Fasano CA. Papapetrou EP. Tomishima M. Sadelain M. Studer L. Highly efficient neural conversion of human ES and iPS cells by dual inhibition of SMAD signaling. Nat Biotechnol. 2009;27:275–280. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Drury-Stewart D. Song M. Mohamad O. Yu SP. Wei L. Small molecule promoted feeder free and adherent differentiation of functional neurons from human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells. J Stem Cells. 2012;6:1–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Cui L. Jiang J. Wei L. Zhou X. Fraser JL. Snider BJ. Yu SP. Transplantation of embryonic stem cells improves nerve repair and functional recovery after severe sciatic nerve axotomy in rats. Stem Cells. 2008;26:1356–1365. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Regad T. Roth M. Bredenkamp N. Illing N. Papalopulu N. The neural progenitor-specifying activity of FoxG1 is antagonistically regulated by CKI and FGF. Nat Cell Biol. 2007;9:531–540. doi: 10.1038/ncb1573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mullen RJ. Buck CR. Smith AM. NeuN, a neuronal specific nuclear protein in vertebrates. Development. 1992;116:201–211. doi: 10.1242/dev.116.1.201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wolf HK. Buslei R. Schmidt-Kastner R. Schmidt-Kastner PK. Pietsch T. Wiestler OD. Blumcke I. NeuN: a useful neuronal marker for diagnostic histopathology. J Histochem Cytochem. 1996;44:1167–1171. doi: 10.1177/44.10.8813082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Shea TB. Beermann ML. Respective roles of neurofilaments, microtubules, MAP1B, and tau in neurite outgrowth and stabilization. Mol Biol Cell. 1994;5:863–875. doi: 10.1091/mbc.5.8.863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lee MK. Cleveland DW. Neurofilament function and dysfunction: involvement in axonal growth and neuronal disease. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1994;6:34–40. doi: 10.1016/0955-0674(94)90113-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Menezes JR. Luskin MB. Expression of neuron-specific tubulin defines a novel population in the proliferative layers of the developing telencephalon. J Neurosci. 1994;14:5399–5416. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-09-05399.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Menezes JR. Smith CM. Nelson KC. Luskin MB. The division of neuronal progenitor cells during migration in the neonatal mammalian forebrain. Mol Cell Neurosci. 1995;6:496–508. doi: 10.1006/mcne.1995.0002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Luskin MB. Zigova T. Soteres BJ. Stewart RR. Neuronal progenitor cells derived from the anterior subventricular zone of the neonatal rat forebrain continue to proliferate in vitro and express a neuronal phenotype. Mol Cell Neurosci. 1997;8:351–366. doi: 10.1006/mcne.1996.0592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Curtetti R. Garbossa D. Vercelli A. Development of dendritic bundles of pyramidal neurons in the rat visual cortex. Mech Ageing Dev. 2002;123:473–479. doi: 10.1016/s0047-6374(01)00357-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hayashi N. Oohira A. Miyata S. Synaptic localization of receptor-type protein tyrosine phosphatase zeta/beta in the cerebral and hippocampal neurons of adult rats. Brain Res. 2005;1050:163–169. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.05.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Mastick GS. Andrews GL. Pax6 regulates the identity of embryonic diencephalic neurons. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2001;17:190–207. doi: 10.1006/mcne.2000.0924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Jones L. Lopez-Bendito G. Gruss P. Stoykova A. Molnar Z. Pax6 is required for the normal development of the forebrain axonal connections. Development. 2002;129:5041–5052. doi: 10.1242/dev.129.21.5041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Englund C. Fink A. Lau C. Pham D. Daza RA. Bulfone A. Kowalczyk T. Hevner RF. Pax6, Tbr2, and Tbr1 are expressed sequentially by radial glia, intermediate progenitor cells, and postmitotic neurons in developing neocortex. J Neurosci. 2005;25:247–251. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2899-04.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Quinn JC. Molinek M. Martynoga BS. Zaki PA. Faedo A. Bulfone A. Hevner RF. West JD. Price DJ. Pax6 controls cerebral cortical cell number by regulating exit from the cell cycle and specifies cortical cell identity by a cell autonomous mechanism. Dev Biol. 2007;302:50–65. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.08.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hevner RF. Hodge RD. Daza RA. Englund C. Transcription factors in glutamatergic neurogenesis: conserved programs in neocortex, cerebellum, and adult hippocampus. Neurosci Res. 2006;55:223–233. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2006.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Maekawa M. Takashima N. Arai Y. Nomura T. Inokuchi K. Yuasa S. Osumi N. Pax6 is required for production and maintenance of progenitor cells in postnatal hippocampal neurogenesis. Genes Cells. 2005;10:1001–1014. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2443.2005.00893.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Martynoga B. Morrison H. Price DJ. Mason JO. Foxg1 is required for specification of ventral telencephalon and region-specific regulation of dorsal telencephalic precursor proliferation and apoptosis. Dev Biol. 2005;283:113–127. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Miyoshi G. Fishell G. Dynamic FoxG1 expression coordinates the integration of multipolar pyramidal neuron precursors into the cortical plate. Neuron. 2012;74:1045–1058. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.04.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.McCormick DA. Prince DA. Post-natal development of electrophysiological properties of rat cerebral cortical pyramidal neurones. J Physiol. 1987;393:743–762. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Huguenard JR. Hamill OP. Prince DA. Developmental changes in Na+ conductances in rat neocortical neurons: appearance of a slowly inactivating component. J Neurophysiol. 1988;59:778–795. doi: 10.1152/jn.1988.59.3.778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Beique JC. Campbell B. Perring P. Hamblin MW. Walker P. Mladenovic L. Andrade R. Serotonergic regulation of membrane potential in developing rat prefrontal cortex: coordinated expression of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)1A, 5-HT2A, and 5-HT7 receptors. J Neurosci. 2004;24:4807–4817. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5113-03.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Zhang ZW. Maturation of layer V pyramidal neurons in the rat prefrontal cortex: intrinsic properties and synaptic function. J Neurophysiol. 2004;91:1171–1182. doi: 10.1152/jn.00855.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Higgs MH. Spain WJ. Conditional bursting enhances resonant firing in neocortical layer 2–3 pyramidal neurons. J Neurosci. 2009;29:1285–1299. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3728-08.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Guan D. Horton LR. Armstrong WE. Foehring RC. Postnatal development of A-type and Kv1- and Kv2-mediated potassium channel currents in neocortical pyramidal neurons. J Neurophysiol. 2011;105:2976–2988. doi: 10.1152/jn.00758.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hodgkin AL. Huxley AF. Currents carried by sodium and potassium ions through the membrane of the giant axon of Loligo. J Physiol. 1952;116:449–472. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1952.sp004717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Johnson MA. Weick JP. Pearce RA. Zhang SC. Functional neural development from human embryonic stem cells: accelerated synaptic activity via astrocyte coculture. J Neurosci. 2007;27:3069–3077. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4562-06.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Yuan W. Burkhalter A. Nerbonne JM. Functional role of the fast transient outward K+ current IA in pyramidal neurons in (rat) primary visual cortex. J Neurosci. 2005;25:9185–9194. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2858-05.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Nerbonne JM. Gerber BR. Norris A. Burkhalter A. Electrical remodelling maintains firing properties in cortical pyramidal neurons lacking KCND2-encoded A-type K+ currents. J Physiol. 2008;586:1565–1579. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.146597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kihira Y. Hermanstyne TO. Misonou H. Formation of heteromeric Kv2 channels in mammalian brain neurons. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:15048–15055. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.074260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Norris AJ. Nerbonne JM. Molecular dissection of I(A) in cortical pyramidal neurons reveals three distinct components encoded by Kv4.2, Kv4.3, and Kv1.4 alpha-subunits. J Neurosci. 2010;30:5092–5101. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5890-09.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Lien CC. Jonas P. Kv3 potassium conductance is necessary and kinetically optimized for high-frequency action potential generation in hippocampal interneurons. J Neurosci. 2003;23:2058–2068. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-06-02058.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ding S. Matta SG. Zhou FM. Kv3-like potassium channels are required for sustained high-frequency firing in basal ganglia output neurons. J Neurophysiol. 2011;105:554–570. doi: 10.1152/jn.00707.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.DeLorenzo RJ. Freedman SD. Yohe WB. Maurer SC. Stimulation of Ca2+-dependent neurotransmitter release and presynaptic nerve terminal protein phosphorylation by calmodulin and a calmodulin-like protein isolated from synaptic vesicles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979;76:1838–1842. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.4.1838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Littleton JT. Stern M. Perin M. Bellen HJ. Calcium dependence of neurotransmitter release and rate of spontaneous vesicle fusions are altered in Drosophila synaptotagmin mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91:10888–10892. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.23.10888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Glitsch MD. Spontaneous neurotransmitter release and Ca2+—how spontaneous is spontaneous neurotransmitter release? Cell Calcium. 2008;43:9–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2007.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Vyleta NP. Smith SM. Spontaneous glutamate release is independent of calcium influx and tonically activated by the calcium-sensing receptor. J Neurosci. 2011;31:4593–4606. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6398-10.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]