Abstract
Sediment samples collected off the coast of San Diego were analyzed for actinomycete diversity using culture independent techniques. Eight new operational taxonomic units (OTUs) in the Streptomycetaceae were identified as well as new diversity within previously cultured marine OTUs. Sequences belonging to the marine actinomycete genus Salinispora were also detected, despite the fact that this genus has only been reported from more tropical environments. Independent analyses of marine sediments from the Canary Basin (3814 m) and the South Pacific Gyre (5126 and 5699 m) also revealed Salinispora sequences providing further support for the occurrence of this genus in deep-sea sediments. Efforts to culture Salinispora spp. from these samples have yet to be successful. This is the first report of Salinispora spp. from marine sediments >1100m and suggests that the distribution of this genus is broader than previously believed.
Introduction
The phylum Actinobacteria is extraordinarily diverse (Gao & Gupta, 2012) and well represented in the marine environment (Rappé, et al., 1999). Of the five subclasses that comprise this phylum (the Acidomicrobidae, Actinobacteridae, Coriobacteridae, Nitriliruptoridae, and Rubrobacteridae) sequences belonging to the Acidomicrobidae are commonly observed when culture-independent techniques are applied (Jensen & Lauro, 2008). Conversely, cultured Actinobacteria often fall within the subclass Actinobacteridae and, more specifically, within the order Actinomycetales. These bacteria are commonly referred to as actinomycetes and have been targeted from marine samples for their ability to produce structurally novel secondary metabolites (Zotchev, 2012). While a number of marine actinomycete species and genera have been described (Goodfellow, et al., 2012) (Tian, et al., 2009; Zhao, et al., 2009; Tian, et al., 2009b) it is not clear how well these cultured strains represent the extant diversity present in the marine environment.
Culture-independent studies have revealed the presence of actinomycetes in seawater (Yoshida, et al., 2008) and deep-sea marine sediments (Stach, et al., 2003). Less abundant taxa such as the marine actinomycete genus Salinispora (Maldonado, et al., 2005) have been detected when specific primers targeting this group were applied (Mincer, et al., 2005). Actinomycetes have also been detected in marine sponges, facilitating the selection of culture media and further increasing the diversity of isolates recovered (Webster, et al., 2001). In a separate study of two sponges from China, a wide difference between the genera observed using actinomycete specific primers and cultivation-based methods was observed (Xin, et al., 2008). Further studies on one of these sponges revealed the importance of using both culture and culture-independent methods when studying actinomycete diversity (Sun, et al., 2010). While all methods suffer from inherent biases, culture-independent techniques can help establish the occurrence of bacteria in specific environments.
In a prior study of sediment samples collected off the coast of California, culture-dependent actinomycete diversity was assessed between near-shore and offshore sites (Prieto-Davó, et al., 2008). The results revealed considerable, marine-specific diversity and high levels of terrestrial influence out to 125 km from shore. The present study was undertaken to provide a culture-independent assessment of the collective actinomycete diversity present in five of these samples. These studies were complimented by independent analyses of deep-sea sediment samples collected from the Canary Basin and the South Pacific Gyre (SPG).
Materials and Methods
Sample collection
To further explore the diversity of actinomycetes present in marine sediments collected off the coast of California, five of eleven sediment samples previously employed for cultivation studies (Prieto-Davó, et al., 2008) were used to generate 16S rRNA gene clone libraries targeting the order Actinomycetales. All of these samples were collected using an untethered coring device designed and constructed at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography (SIO). The depths and collection sites are provided in Supplemental table 1. Each core was divided into 5 or 6 sections as previously described (Prieto-Davó, et al., 2008). Approximately 1 g of wet sediment from each section was placed in a 1.5 ml Eppendorf tube containing 1 ml of sucrose lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 0.25 M sucrose) and immediately stored on ice for transportation to shore. Long-term storage was at −20°C.
Samples from the Canary Basin and the SPG were analyzed specifically for the presence of Salinispora spp. The Canary Basin sample was collected as previously described (Stach, et al., 2003b). The SPG samples were collected using gravity or piston cores during the KNOX-02RR expedition (D’Hondt, et al., 2009). A total of 11 cores were sectioned and sub-sampled from 3–5 times at various depths from the sediment surface to the bottom of the core generating a total of 51 samples (Supplemental table 2). Sub-cores were taken from each section by first removing the top layer of sediment with a sterile spatula. Cut-off sterilized syringes were then pushed into the core resulting in an uncontaminated sub-core. The syringe containing the sub-core was stored intact in heat sealed bags at −80°C prior to molecular analysis.
DNA extraction, PCR amplification and cloning
Environmental DNA (eDNA) was extracted from the sediment samples collected off the coast of California using a soil DNA extraction kit (cat. No 69506) according to manufacturer’s protocol (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). 16S rRNA gene primers targeting the order Actinomycetales (Stach, et al., 2003) and the families Streptomycetaceae and Micromonosporacea (Monciardini, et al., 2002) were used (Supplemental table 3). PCR amplification of 1–4 μl of eDNA (18–20 ng/mL) was done in triplicate for each sample as follows: initial denaturation at 95°C for 10 min followed by 30 cycles of 94°C for 45 s, 65°C for 45 s and 72°C for 1 min, followed by a 10 min extension at 72°C. Triplicate PCR products were pooled and purified using MiniElute PCR purification columns according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Qiagen). Purified DNA was ligated to the plasmid vector pCR® 2.1-TOPO® and used to transform One Shot® Mach1 ™ - T1® chemically competent cells using a Topo TA® cloning kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Invitrogen). Transformed clones were identified using white blue selection and inoculated into 10 ml Falcon tubes containing 3 ml of LB broth and 50 μg/ml kanamycin. Plasmid DNA was extracted using the QiaPrep® MiniPrep extraction kit according to manufacturer’s instructions (Qiagen), digested with BstX I (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, MA), and run on a 1% agarose gel to confirm the presence of the correct sized insert.
eDNA was extracted from 10 g of Canary Basin sediment using an UltraClean Mega DNA soil kit (Mo Bio Laboratories, Solana Beach, CA). The primers (Supplemental table 3) and PCR conditions are as previously described (Stach, et al., 2003). PCR products were purified using QIAquick gel extraction columns according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Qiagen, Crawley, United Kingdom). Purified DNA was blunt-end ligated into the plasmid vector pST-Blue-1 and used to transform NovaBlue competent cells using a Perfectly Blunt cloning kit (Novagen, Madison, Wis.). Cloned plasmid DNA was extracted as described above and the presence of inserts confirmed by PCR using previously described primers (Stach, et al., 2003).
For the SPG sediments, a modified FastDNA® SPIN kit for soil protocol (Qbiogene, Irvine, CA), followed by ChromaSpin™ TE-100 columns (Clontech, Mountain View, CA), was used to ensure high eDNA yields and purity (Froschner, et al., 2009). The eDNA samples were subjected to whole genome amplification using the REPLI-g® Midi kit (Qiagen) as previously described (Froschner, et al., 2009), and analyzed for the presence of Salinispora spp. using Salinispora-specific 16S rRNA gene PCR primers (Supplemental table 3). The reactions included 200 ng of whole genome amplification product and consisted of an initial 5 minute denaturation step at 94°C followed by 30 cycles of 30 sec at 94°C, 90 sec at 60°C and 90 sec at 72°C followed by a final 10 minute extension at 72°C. The reaction products were purified using a QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen) following manufacturer’s guidelines and quantified using a NanoDrop Spectrophotometer (NanoDrop, Wilmington, DE). PCR amplicons were cloned using the pGEM®-T Easy Vector System (Promega, Madison, WI) at a 1:1 insert to vector ratio per the manufacturer’s protocol. Transformed clones were grown overnight in LB broth and the plasmids extracted using Wizard® Plus SV Minipreps (Promega).
Terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis
T-RFLP was used to probe the SPG samples for the presence of Salinispora spp. Whole genome amplification products were PCR amplified as described above with the addition of a 6-FAM label to the forward primer. The Salinispora-specific primers were designed as part of a prior study and shown to be >98% specific for this taxon (Mincer et al., 2005). Approximately 40 ng of fluorescently labeled PCR product was digested independently with 4 U of the restriction enzymes AluI, AvaII, and EcoO109I in 10 μl reaction volumes. Reference T-RFLs were generated for the three Salinsipora species by digesting labeled PCR products from cultured strains (Supplemental table 5). The restriction digests were incubated at 37°C for 16 hours to ensure complete digestion prior to being deactivated at 65°C for 20 minutes. The digests were precipitated and re-suspended in Hi-Di formamide (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, California) to a final concentration of approximately 0.6 ng/μL. 0.5 μL GeneScan Liz 1200 size standard (Applied Biosystems) was added to each sample. The samples were denatured at 95°C for five minutes and placed immediately on ice. The terminally labeled restriction fragments (T-RFs) were visualized with the Applied Biosystems 3130xl genetic analysis system (Applied Biosystems).
Sequencing and phylogenetic analyses
Plasmid inserts from the California samples were sequenced at the UCSD Rebecca and John Moore Cancer Center using the M13 primer included in the vector (Invitrogen). Sequences were analyzed using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) function of GenBank (Altschul, et al., 1990) and strains with the highest level of sequence identity were recorded as top BLAST matches regardless of whether or not they were associated with a formal publication. Top matches and cloned sequences belonging to the Micromonosporaceae (560 bp) and Streptomycetaceae (533 bp) were clustered into OTUs based on ≥99% 16S rRNA gene sequence identity using the java application Clusterer (http://www.bugaco.com/mioritic/clusterer_jlp.php). In addition, OTU representatives from cultured strains derived from all 11 samples used in a prior study (Prieto-Davó, et al., 2008) were included in the clustering analyses. Sequences were then aligned using ClustalX (Larkin, et al., 2007) and imported into MacClade for manual curation of the alignment (http://macclade.org).
Plasmid inserts derived from the Canary Basin PCR products were sequenced by Qiagen using the SP6 universal primer. Plasmid inserts from the SPG samples were sequenced using the 16S primers or vector primers (T7, SP6). Sequencing was performed on an Applied Biosystems 3130xl Genetic Analyser (Applied Biosystems) at the University of Rhode Island’s Genomics and Sequencing Center (Kingston, RI). The resulting sequences were trimmed and contigs built using Sequencher™ (Gene Codes, Ann Arbor, Michigan).
Maximum Likelihood rooted phylogenetic trees (HKY85 substitution model, 1000 bootstraps) were constructed for the Streptomycetaceae and Micromonosporaceae using PhyML (Guindon, et al., 2010) via http://www.phylogeny.fr/ and http://www.atgc-montpellier.fr/phyml/ (Dereeper, et al., 2008). Trees were edited using Inkscape (inkscape.org). For both phylogenetic trees, top BLAST matches, as well as previously cultivated OTU representatives (Prieto-Davó, et al., 2008), were included.
Diversity Estimations
Estimates of the diversity present in the California clone libraries were performed using the statistical package EstimateS (http://purl.oclc.org/estimates) with 1000 runs for each library.
Results
Clone libraries targeting the order Actinomycetales (actinomycetes) and the families Streptomycetaceae and Micromonosporaceae were generated from five independent sediment cores collected off the coast of California (Supplemental table 1). The Actinomycetales-specific primers yielded largely non-Actinobacterial sequences and Actinobacteria in the sub-class Acidomicrobidae, which is outside of the Actinomycetales. In response, primers specific for the Streptomycetaceae and Micromonosporaceae were used since these were the dominant families cultured previously from these samples. Clone libraries were generated from two of the sediment cores using the Streptomycetaceae primers, two using the Micromonosporaceae primers, and one using both primer sets (Supplemental table 4). All libraries were generated from the surface section of the cores, with the exception of sample SD06-13, from which libraries were generated from all five sections. Seventy-seven of the combined 79 clones obtained using the Streptomycetaceae primers belonged to this family confirming the specificity of that primer set. The cloning efficiency of the Micromonosporaceae primers was poor and yielded only 23 sequences, of which 22 belonged to the targeted family.
The 99 Streptomycetaceae and Micromonosporaceae clones were clustered based on ≥99% sequence identity (Table 1). This yielded a total of 41 OTUs, each of which contained from 1–10 clones (average = 2). Of these, representatives of eight OTUs were cultured as part of a prior study (Prieto-Davó, et al., 2008) (Table 1, Figures 1 and 2). When compared more broadly to GenBank, which includes the sequences from the prior study, 33 of the 41 OTUs from this study have cultured representatives and thus eight can be considered new in terms of publically available sequence data. The majority of the OTUs (37) and all of the eight new OTUs belong to the Streptomycetaceae. The OTUs in this family are scattered throughout the phylogenetic tree, however two of the new OTUs (represented by clones SD06-09A-02 and SD06-13C-01) form a well-supported clade with the marine-derived actinomycete strain CNQ-085 (Figure 1). Two more of the new OTUs, represented by SD06-07A-01 and SD06-13E-03, belong to a much larger and previously identified marine clade that includes the new species Streptomyces marinus (Prieto-Davó, et al., 2008) and the cloned OTU (SD06-13A-10). One additional OTU (SD06-13B-01) belongs to another cultivated marine clade (Prieto-Davó, et al., 2008) while the two remaining new OTUs (SD06-09A-06 and SD06-13A-02) are distantly related to previously observed sequences.
Table 1.
Clustering of Streptomycetaceae and Micromonosporaceae clones into OTUs based on >99% 16S rRNA sequence identity over 560 bp (Streptomycetaceae) and 533 bp (Micromonosporaceae).
| Family | Cloned OTUs | Cultured OTUs a | GenBank cultured OTUs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Streptomycetaceae | 37 | 5 | 29 |
| Micromonosporaceae | 4 | 3 | 4 |
| Total | 41 | 8 | 33 |
Based on a prior analysis of the same sediment samples (Prieto-Davó et al., 2008).
Figure 1.
Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree of Streptomycetaceae 16S rRNA gene sequences. Environmental sequences from California begin with SD and are followed by number of clones (in parentheses) and accession number. Cultured strains were derived from a prior study (sequences beginning with CN). Blast matches are included with species and strain name followed by accession number. Bold = new OTU (shares ≤98% sequence identity with any sequences deposited in Genbank), italics = marine OTU (all sequences in the OTU were derived from marine sources), underlined = OTU representative in culture. Boxed clade = marine clade (all sequences in the OTU plus top Blast match and cultivars were derived from marine sources). Based on the analysis of 533 bp nucleotide positions and 1000 bootstraps.
Figure 2.
Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree of Micromonosporaceae 16S rRNA gene sequences. Environmental sequences from California begin with SD and are followed by number of clones (in parentheses) and accession number. Sequences from the Canary Basin start with CB and the South Pacific Gyre with SPG. Cultured strains were derived from a prior study (sequences beginning with CN). Blast matches are included with species and strain name followed by accession number. Bold = new OTU (shares ≤98% sequence identity with any sequences deposited in Genbank), italics = marine OTU (all sequences in the OTU were derived from marine sources), underlined = OTU representative in culture. Based on the analysis of 560 nucleotide positions and 1000 bootstraps.
In an effort to estimate the total diversity in the sediments sampled, a rank abundance curve was generated from the combined Streptomycetaceae clone libraries. This curve shows little duplication and a long right-hand tail, as is characteristic of a highly diverse community (Figure 3). This is supported by three diversity estimators (ACE, Chao 1, and Jackknife 1), which predict that, on average, 70 OTUs were present in the three samples analyzed (Figure 4). The shape of the accumulation curve provides clear evidence that additional sequencing could reveal additional diversity. The Micromonosporaceae clones formed only four OTUs and thus a rank abundance curve was not generated. The poor cloning efficiency and low number of sequences analyzed suggest that additional studies of this family are warranted. Although none of the Micromonosporaceae OTUs were considered new, one claded with Catellatospora spp. (clones SD06-11-02 and SD06-12-08) and a second, which included three cloned sequences, claded with Salinispora spp. (clone SD06-12-01) (Figure 2). The other two OTUs claded with Micromonospora spp. (clones SD06-12-05 and SD06-13-01). This is the first evidence that Salinispora spp. occur in temperate marine environments (Jensen & Mafnas, 2006) (Freel, et al., 2012). Given that neither Catellatospora nor Salinispora spp. had previously been cultured from these samples, cultivation techniques specific for both genera were applied (Ara & Kudo, 2006) (Freel, et al., 2012). However, only Micromonospora spp. were recovered.
Figure 3.
Rank abundance curve for the San Diego Streptomycetaceae clone library. Seventy-seven clones generated from three independent libraries were combined and grouped into OTUs based on 99% 16S rRNA gene sequence identity.
Figure 4.
Diversity estimators for the San Diego Streptomycetaceae clone library. Seventy-seven clones generated from three independent libraries were analyzed.
Independent analyses of deep-sea marine sediment samples collected from the Canary Basin and the South Pacific Gyre (SPG) were also performed to test for the presence of Salinispora sequences. A clone library generated from a Canary Basin sediment sample collected at a depth of 3,814 m revealed the presence of one Salinispora sequence (Table 2). Eleven deep-sea sediment cores obtained from the SPG were subdivided into 51 sections and analyzed by T-RFLP. PCR products were obtained using Salinispora-specific primers (Mincer et al., 2005) from 25 of the 51 sub-samples including samples from each of the 11 sites (Supplemental table 2). The second depth below the sediment surface (0.3–0.89 m) yielded the largest number of successful PCR amplifications. T-RFLP analyses were performed on the 25 PCR products and all 25 yielded T-RFs of the expected size for Salinispora spp. (Supplemental table 5). Clone libraries generated from three of the PCR-positive samples (SPG1, SPG2-1, and SPG2-3) yielded eight Salinispora sequences and confirmed the presence of the genus in sediments collected at a depth of 5699 m (Table 2). Additional sequencing would be required to confirm the presence of the genus in the remaining 22 samples. All of these sequences clade with Salinispora spp. (Fig. 2) and fall within a single 99% OTU. However, due to the lack of species-specific nucleotides in the region sequenced, it is not possible to assign species level identifications. Collectively, these results provide the first evidence that Salinispora spp. occur at depths >1100 m (Freel, et al., 2012) and outside of the geographical range from which the genus has been reported using culture dependent methods (Mincer, et al., 2005).
Table 2.
Salinispora clones obtained from deep-sea sediment samples.
| Clone | Location | Depth (m) | NCBI closest BLASTn match* | Accession Numbers | Similarity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SD06-12-01 | San Diego | 1133 | S. pacifica CNH-732; Salinispora sp. CNR-040 | DQ2244165.1; AY040617 | 99% |
| SPG2-1-1A | Pacific Gyre | 5126 | S. pacifica CNT-138; S. arenicola CNT-850 | HQ642853.1; HQ642848.1 | 100% |
| SPG2-1-1E | Pacific Gyre | 5126 | S. pacifica CNT-138; S. arenicola CNT-851 | HQ642853.1; HQ642848.2 | 99% |
| SPG2-3-1B | Pacific Gyre | 5126 | S. pacifica CNT-138; S. arenicola CNT-852 | HQ642853.1; HQ642848.3 | 100% |
| SPG2-3-3:1H | Pacific Gyre | 5126 | S. pacifica CNT-138; S. arenicola CNT-853 | HQ642853.1; HQ642848.4 | 99% |
| SPG1-1A | Pacific Gyre | 5699 | S. pacifica CNT-138; S. arenicola CNT-854 | HQ642853.1; HQ642848.5 | 100% |
| SPG1-1D | Pacific Gyre | 5699 | S. pacifica CNT-138; S. arenicola CNT-855 | HQ642853.1; HQ642848.6 | 99% |
| SPG1-2G | Pacific Gyre | 5699 | S. pacifica CNT-138; S. arenicola CNT-856 | HQ642853.1; HQ642848.7 | 100% |
| SPG1-4A | Pacific Gyre | 5699 | S. pacifica CNT-148; S. arenicola NH13C | HQ642899.1; FJ232412.1 | 99% |
| 3896_JS14B02 | Canary Basin | 3814 | S. pacifica CNT-148 | HQ642899.1 | 99% |
In cases where equivalent best matches were found to two species, both are reported.
Discussion
Cultivation independent methods are widely recognized as providing a more accurate estimation of bacterial diversity than culture-based approaches (Wagner, et al., 1993) (Hugenholtz, et al., 1998). As a follow up to a prior study of cultured marine actinomycete diversity in sediments collected off the coast of California (Prieto-Davó, et al., 2008), we performed culture-independent analyses on a sub-set of the samples. The results reveal eight new OTUs in the family Streptomycetaceae and numerous clones that expand the extant diversity associated with previously cultured marine actinobacterial lineages. Statistical analyses suggest that additional sequencing will uncover additional diversity in this family, a conclusion also reached by Stach & Bull (2005) in relation to the analysis of Canary Basin sediments. In addition, it is also clear that some of the cultured OTUs were not observed in the clone libraries (Figure 1). This could be due to insufficient sequencing, however it supports the concept that culture-dependent methods provide a method to access members of the rare biosphere that are frequently missed when culture-independent methods are applied (Shade, et al., 2012), even in cases such as this where taxon-specific primers are employed.
In the case of the Micromonosporaceae, the small size of the library made it difficult to predict the diversity in this family. Despite the small number of clones sequenced, seven (32%) were identified as Salinispora spp. This result was surprising considering that this genus has not previously been reported from temperate environments (Freel, et al., 2012) and that extensive cultivation efforts over many years have failed to recover this taxon from sediments collected off the coast of California. Additional cultivation efforts using the samples that yielded Salinispora clones also failed to produce these bacteria in culture suggesting that techniques other than those proven successful for tropical samples (Gontang, et al., 2007) are required.
The culture-independent results obtained for the sediments collected off the coast of California suggest that the biogeographical distributions of Salinispora spp. may be broader than previously estimated based on culture-dependent approaches (Freel, et al., 2012). To further explore this possibility, deep-sea sediment samples collected from the Canary Basin (3,814 m) and the South Pacific Gyre (5,126 and 5,699 m) were analyzed using culture-independent techniques. Both locations yielded Salinispora clones, providing a new depth record for the detection of this genus and additional evidence for its widespread occurrence in deep ocean sediments. Samples collected from the SPG sites, which extend from American Samoa to New Zealand (Supplemental figure 1), consistently tested positive for Salinispora 16S rRNA gene sequences, providing evidence that the genus is broadly distributed in deep ocean sediments. It remains unclear if the DNA from which these sequences originated was derived from viable cells or spores. Conditions in the deep sea include high pressures and low temperatures, which may inhibit growth. Yet extensive cultivation efforts applied to the California (Prieto-Davó, et al., 2008), Canary Basin (Stach, et al., 2003), and SPG samples failed to yield Salinispora strains, suggesting they require cultivation conditions that differ from the strains that have been obtained from more tropical sites. While there was no phylogenetic evidence that the deep-sea Salinispora sequences are distinct (Figure 2), less-conserved phylogenetic markers may need to be analyzed before any conclusions can be reached about their population structure.
Due to the specificity of the primers, it is likely that considerable actinomycete diversity was omitted from this study. However, the families targeted are among the most prolific in terms of secondary metabolite production and include a number of new marine taxa (Jensen, et al., 2005) (Goodfellow, et al., 2012). The results presented here suggest that additional new diversity within the Streptomycetaceae remains to be cultured from marine sediments thus supporting further studies of deep-sea actinomycetes as a resource for natural product discovery. In addition, there is intriguing new evidence that Salinispora spp. are broadly distributed in deep-sea marine sediments. It will be important to develop cultivation techniques appropriate for these bacteria and to determine if they have developed adaptations to life in the deep sea that may include the production of new secondary metabolites.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
PRJ acknowledges financial support from the California Sea Grant College Program Project #R/NMP-100 (Grant #NA100AOAR4170060) through NOAA’S National Sea Grant College Program, USA Dept. of Commerce. The statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of California Sea Grant or the USA Dept. of Commerce. JEMS and ATB acknowledge financial support from the UK Natural Environmental Research Council (Grants NER/T/S/2000/00614 and NER/T/S/2000/00616). This project was supported by a graduate fellowship from Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT #157730) to AP-D. DCR and DCS acknowledge financial support from the National Institutes of Health (Grant #1R15AI093158-01) and the National Science Foundation (award 0752336) and thank the captain and the crew of the R/V Revelle and chief scientist S. D’Hondt.
Footnotes
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215(3):403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ara I, Kudo T. Three novel species of the genus Catellatospora, Catellatospora chokoriensis sp. nov., Catellatospora coxensis sp. nov. and Catellatospora bangladeshensis sp. nov., and transfer of Catellatospora citrea subsp. methionotrophica Asano and Kawamoto 1988 to Catellatospora methionotrophica sp. nov., comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Micr. 2006;56(2):393–400. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63862-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.D’Hondt S, Spivack A, Pockalny R, Ferdelman TG, Fischer JP, Kallmeyer J, Abrams L, Smith DC, Graham D, Hasiuk F, Schrum H, Stancin AM. Subseafloor sedimentary life in the South Pacific Gyre. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(28):11651–11656. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0811793106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Dereeper A, Guignon V, Blanc G, Audic S, Buffet S, Chevenet F, Dufayard JF, Guindon S, Lefort V, Lescot M, Claverie JM, Gascuel O. Phylogeny.fr: Robust phylogenetic analysis for the non-specialist. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;1(36):W465–9. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Freel KC, Edlund A, Jensen PR. Microdiversity and evidence for high dispersal rates in the marine actinomycete ‘Salinispora pacifica’. Environ Microbiol. 2012;14(2):480–493. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02641.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Froschner S, Sheffer R, Rowley D, Smith D. Microbial diversitiy in Cenozoic sediments recovered from the Lomonosov Ridge in the Central Arctic basin. Environ Microbiol. 2009;11(3):630–639. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01834.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gao B, Gupta RS. Phylogenetic framework and molecular signatures for the main clades of the phylum Actinobacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol R. 2012;76(1):66–112. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.05011-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gontang E, Fenical W, Jensen P. Phylogenetic diversity of Gram-positive bacteria cultured from marine sediments. Appl Environ Microb. 2007;73:3272–3282. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02811-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Goodfellow M, Stach JE, Brown R, Bonda AN, Jones AL, Mexson J, Fiedler HP, Zucchi TD, Bull AT. Verrucosispora maris sp. nov., a novel deep-sea actinomycete isolated from a marine sediment which produces abyssomicins. A van Leeuw J Microb. 2012;101:185–193. doi: 10.1007/s10482-011-9651-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Guindon S, Dufayard JF, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, Gascuel O. New Algorithms and Methods to Estimate Maximum-Likelihood Phylogenies: Assessing the Performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol. 2010;59(3):307–21. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syq010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hugenholtz P, Goebel BM, Pace NR. Impact of culture-independent studies on the emerging phylogenetic view of bacterial diversity. J Bacteriol. 1998;180(18):4765. doi: 10.1128/jb.180.18.4765-4774.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jensen PR, Lauro FM. An assessment of actinobacterial diversity in the marine environment. A van Leeuw J Microb. 2008;94(1):51–62. doi: 10.1007/s10482-008-9239-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Jensen PR, Mafnas C. Biogeography of the marine actinomycete Salinispora. Environ Microbiol. 2006;8(11):1881–1888. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01093.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Jensen PR, Mincer TJ, Williams PG, Fenical W. Marine actinomycete diversity and natural product discovery. A van Leeuw J Microb. 2005;87: 43–48. doi: 10.1007/s10482-004-6540-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R, Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics. 2007;23(21):2947–2948. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Maldonado LA, Fenical W, Jensen PR, Kauffman CA, Mincer TJ, Ward AC, Bull AT, Goodfellow M. Salinispora arenicola gen.nov., sp. nov. and Salinispora tropica sp. nov, obligate marine actinomycetes belonging to the family Micromonosporaceae. Int J Syst Evol Micr. 2005;55:1759–1766. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63625-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mincer TJ, Fenical W, Jensen PR. Culture-dependent and culture-independent diversity within the obligate marine actinomycete genus Salinispora. Appl Environ Microb. 2005;71(11):7019–7028. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.11.7019-7028.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Monciardini P, Sosio M, Cavaletti L, Chiocchini C, Donadio S. New PCR primers for the selective amplification of 16S rDNA from different groups of actinomycetes. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2002;42:419–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2002.tb01031.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Prieto-Davó A, Fenical W, Jensen PR. Comparative actinomycete diversity in marine sediments. Aquat Microb Ecol. 2008;52:1–11. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Rappé MS, Gordon DA, Vergin KL, Giovannoni S. Phylogeny of actinobacteria small subunit (SSU) rRNA gene clones recovered from marine bacterioplankton. Syst Appl Microbiol. 1999;22:106–112. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Shade A, Hogan CS, Klimowicz AK, Linske M, McManus PS, Handelsman J. Culturing captures members of soil rare biosphere. Environ Microbiol. 2012;14(9):2247–2252. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02817.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Stach J, Maldonado L, Ward AC, Goodfellow M, Bull A. New primers for the class Actinobacteria: application to marine and terrestrial environments. Environ Microbiol. 2003;5(10):828–841. doi: 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2003.00483.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Stach JE, Maldonado LA, Masson DG, Ward AC, Goodfellow M, Bull AT. Statistical approaches to estimating bacterial diversity in marine sediments. Appl and Environ Microb. 2003b;69:6189–6200. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.10.6189-6200.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Stach JEM, Bull AT. Estimating and comparing the diversity of marine actinobacteria. A van Leeuw J Microb. 2005;87:3–9. doi: 10.1007/s10482-004-6524-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sun W, Dai S, Jiang S, Wang G, Liu G, Wu H, Li X. Culture-dependent and culture-independent diversity of Actinobacteria associated with the marine sponge Hymediacidon perleve from the South China Sea. A van Leeuw J Microb. 2010;98:65–75. doi: 10.1007/s10482-010-9430-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tian XP, Tang SK, Dong JD, Zhang YQ, Xu LH, Li WJ. Marinactinospora thermotolerans gen.nov., sp. nov., a marine actinomycete isolated from a sediment in the northern south China sea. Int J Syst Evol Micr. 2009b;59(5):948–952. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.005231-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Tian XP, Zhi XY, Qiu YQ, Zhang YQ, Tang SK, Xu LH, Zhang S, Li WJ. Sciscionella marina gen.nov., sp. nov., a marine actinomycete isolated from a sediment in the northern South China Sea. Int J Syst Evol Micr. 2009;59(2):222–228. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.001982-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wagner M, Amann R, Lemmer H, Schleifer KH. Probing Activated Sludge with Oligonucleotides Specific for Proteobacteria: Inadequacy of Culture-Dependent Methods for Describing Microbial Community Structure. Appl and Environ Microb. 1993;59(5):1520–1525. doi: 10.1128/aem.59.5.1520-1525.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Webster NS, Wilson KJ, Blackall LL, Hill TR. Phylogenetic diversity of bacteria associated with the marine sponge Rhopaloeides odorabile. Appl and Environ Microb. 2001;67(1):434–444. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.1.434-444.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Xin Y, Huang J, Deng M, Zhang W. Culture-independent nested PCR method reveals high diversity of actinobacteria associated wht the marine sponges Hymeniacidon perleve and Sponge sp. A van Leeuw J Microb. 2008;94:533–542. doi: 10.1007/s10482-008-9270-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yoshida A, Seo Y, Suzuki S, Nishino T, Kobayashi T, Hamada-Sato N, Kogure K, Imada C. Actinomycetal community structures in seawater and freshwater examined by DGGE analysis of 16S rRNA gene fragments. Mar Biotechnol. 2008;10:554–563. doi: 10.1007/s10126-008-9092-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zhao XQ, Li WJ, Jiao WC, Li Y, Yuan WJ, Zhang QY, Klenk HP, Suh JW, Bai FW. Streptomyces xinghaiensis sp. nov., isolated from marine sediment. Int J Syst Evol Micr. 2009;59(11):2870–2874. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.009878-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zotchev SB. Marine actinomycetes as an emerging resource for the drug development pipelines. J Biotechnol. 2012;158(4):168–75. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2011.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.




