Skip to main content
The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
. 2013 May;36(3):237–242. doi: 10.1179/2045772313Y.0000000090

Factors affecting the length of stay of patients with traumatic spinal cord injury in Tianjin, China

Qiang Wu 1,#, Guang-Zhi Ning 1,#, Yu-Lin Li 1, Hong-Yong Feng 1, Shi-Qing Feng 1,
PMCID: PMC3654451  PMID: 23809595

Abstract

Purpose

To describe the acute care length of stay (ACLOS) of adult patients with traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) in Tianjin, China, and identify the associated demographic and clinical factors.

Methods

TSCI patients admitted to a general hospital in Tianjin, China from 2004 to 2007 were identified. The predictor variables were demographic and clinical factors, including age, gender, etiology, level of injury, severity, associated injuries, surgery, and complications. The outcome variable was ACLOS. Multivariable linear regression analysis models were used to examine the association between predictor and outcome variables.

Results

This study included 631 TSCI patients. The mean ACLOS was 32.4 ± 37.7 days, with a range of 1–294 days. The median number of hospitalization days was 21 days. Admission to a suburban hospital surgery, urinary infection, poorer functional status, pressure ulcers, and associated injuries were significantly associated with ACLOS.

Conclusion

This study examined the effect of epidemiological and clinical factors on ACLOS in Tianjin, China. The factors that influenced the ACLOS were different from factors reported in other studies. More studies are needed in China to determine the effect of these factors on ACLOS in TSCI patients and to propose a predictive model.

Keywords: China, Length of stay, Spinal cord injury, Trauma

Introduction

Traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) is one of the most devastating types of injury, and it results in different neurological deficits below the level of injury. There is no cure for TSCI, despite the enormous amount of TSCI research, which grows annually. The neurological sequelae in patients with a severe TSCI require long-term care and create an enormous economic burden on affected patients, their families, and society.1,2 China is one of the largest countries in the world (accounting for an estimated 25% of the world's population) and has an enormous TSCI patient population. To optimize resource utilization for acute care centers that treat TSCI patients, it is important to evaluate the determinants of hospitalization length. As for the length of stay (LOS), most research has focused on the rehabilitation LOS,3 and expounded on the effect of gender, age, etiology, severity, level of injury, associated injuries, surgery, complications, and source of hospitalization costs.48 The systematic study of the effect of the aforementioned variables on acute care length of stay (ACLOS) has been rare.9,10 However, predicting ACLOS is of great interest to patients and their family members and caregivers since ACLOS is closely correlated with the cost of care. The efficiency of healthcare provided in an acute care setting is generally completed within a few months. In addition, neurological recovery reaches a plateau, making it timely for the patient to be discharged. Starting rehabilitation as soon as possible is beneficial to functional outcome at discharge.1113

These factors could be used to predict LOS in the departments in which they were examined. However, LOS differed from various places owing to the difference in the economic and social status of the patients and differences in the medical health system. As the largest developing country, the national condition of China is unique because of its large population, rapid economic development, and reform of the social medical health system. To our knowledge, no such study has been reported in China. The goal of this survey was to describe the ACLOS and to identify the possible factors associated with it in Tianjin that is the third largest city in China.

Methods

Subjects and setting

This was a retrospective study of TSCI patients who were admitted and discharged between 2004 and 2008. The patients were all admitted to 17 tertiary hospitals (11 urban hospitals and 6 suburban hospitals) located in eight districts in Tianjin, China. To refine the definition of ACLOS, TSCI patients who were admitted in 2008 and died during hospitalization were excluded to avoid a bias towards a shorter LOS. Patients whose records were missing the date of admission or date of discharge were also excluded. Of the 869 admissions, 631 TSCI patients aged 15 years or older met the inclusion criteria. Excluded were 201 patients who were admitted in 2008, 10 patients who died during hospitalization, and 27 patients who had no date of admission or date of discharge.

Measures and definition

The outcome variable, ACLOS, was obtained from the dataset and examined in the current study. ACLOS only included acute medical care LOS, which was calculated as the number of days in the hospital from the day of the patient's first admission after injury to the date of discharge to the care of family, community hospitals, rehabilitation centers, nursing homes, and so on. The day of admission was day 0.

The predictor variables were composed of sociodemographic and clinical variables. The main sociodemographic variables were age and gender. The main clinical variables were etiology, severity, level of injury, associated injuries, surgery, and complications. We also obtained information regarding the location of the admitting hospital. On the basis of the administrative division to which the medical establishments belonged, the hospitals were classified into two groups: urban or suburban. All predictor variables were obtained from the dataset. Age was a continuous variable, and all other sociodemographic and clinical variables were categorical variables.

Based on the results of our previous study,14,15 the patients were grouped into the following age groups: 15–30, 31–45, 46–60, 61–75, and 75 years or older. The etiology of the TSCI included motor vehicle collisions, low fall (less than 1 m), high fall (greater than 1 m), being struck by a falling object, and other injuries. The severity of the injury was recorded by using the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale. Associated injuries were defined as other injuries that occurred at the same time as the TSCI. Based on previous studies,16,17 associated injuries included head trauma, chest trauma, abdominal trauma, pelvic trauma, and limb fractures. Patients with any of the listed injuries were placed into the associated injury group.

In accordance with the International Spinal Core Injury Core Data Set,18 patients in this study were classified in either the surgical treatment group or the conservative treatment group. Operative procedures included, but were not limited to, laminectomy, spinal decompression, neural canal restoration, discectomy, bone graft, and fusion and internal fixation of the spine. Patients undergoing any the aforementioned surgeries were classified in the surgical group.

Complications included pneumonia or atelectasis, urinary tract infection or urinary stones, electrolyte disturbances, pressure ulcers, wound infections, or fever and deep venous thrombosis. These complications were closely correlated with TSCI. Patients with any of the complications were placed in the complication group.

Statistical analyses

All statistical analyses were performed by using SPSS version 17.0. Descriptive statistics including the means, standard deviation (SD), median, and interquartile range (IQR) were calculated for ACLOS. Because the patients' ACLOSs were highly skewed, we log transformed the data and used the log-transformed ACLOS as the outcome variable. Because the log-transformed ACLOS met the assumption of a normal distribution, parametric statistics (e.g. t-tests and one-way analysis of variance) were used to detect significant differences between subgroups. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to examine the association between ACLOS and the predictor variables. Predictive variables using a P value equal to or less than 0.1 for the univariate analysis were put through a regression test. The significant independent variables contributing to ACLOS in TSCI patients were extracted by using stepwise selection methods. The criteria for inclusion in the final model were P values of less than 0.05.

Results

A total of 631 patients with TSCI were included. Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of the hospitalized patients. Approximately 70% of the hospitalized patients were between 31 and 60 years old. The proportion of males (85.1%) was approximately six times the proportion of females (85.1 vs. 14.9%, respectively). Most patients were admitted in suburban hospitals, accounting for 72.7% of all hospitalizations in Tianjin (Table 1).

Table 1.

Characteristics of TSCI and univariate analysis of the factors for ACLOS

Variables N (%) Mean ± SD Median IQR Statistic* P value
Gender t = 1.379 0.168
 Male 537 (85.1%) 31.6 ± 37.0 21 11–36
 Female 94 (14.9%) 37.3 ± 41.5 23 14–46
Age F = 3.893 0.004
 15–30 100 (15.8%) 38.1 ± 40.0 26.5 15–46
 31–45 207 (32.8%) 33.1 ± 38.4 21 10–38
 46–60 239 (37.9%) 31.8 ± 36.9 21 13–36
 61–75 74 (11.7%) 28.1 ± 36.8 19 8–35
  >75 11 (1.7%) 11.2 ± 5.2 11 9–15
Location of hospital t = 3.762 0.000
 Urban 172 (27.3%) 28.5 ± 39.5 17 8–28
 Suburb 459 (72.7%) 34.1 ± 37.0 24 13–41
Etiologies F = 7.231 0.000
 MVC 217 (34.4%) 36.8 ± 42.1 25 12.5–42
 Low-fall 244 (38.7%) 23.0 ± 20.6 18 10–30
 High-fall 113 (17.9%) 42.2 ± 49.7 26 17–45
 Struck by object 40 (6.3%) 41.6 ± 45.5 25 15.5–58
 Others 17 (2.7%) 26.6 ± 25.0 19 8.5–29
AIS§ F = 16.469 0.000
 A 136 (21.6%) 46.3 ± 49.5 27 18–58
 B 132 (20.9%) 35.9 ± 39.7 26 13–43
 C 109 (17.3%) 34.1 ± 41.8 23 11–41.5
 D 254 (40.3%) 22.5 ± 21.4 17 9–28
Level of injury F = 1.631** 0.197
 Cervical 449 (71.2%) 31.0 ± 36.5 21 11–35
 Thoracic 82 (13.0%) 32.9 ± 32.1 24.5 12–43
 Lumbar 100 (15.8%) 38.8 ± 46.1 22.5 15–43
Associated injuries t = 3.819 0.000
 Yes 163 (25.8%) 40.7 ± 44.8 28 16–49
 No 468 (74.2%) 30.0 ± 34.5 20 10–34
Complication
 Urinary infection 33 (5.2%) 69.2 ± 66.2 46 27–96.5 t = 5.301 0.000
 Respiratory infection 51 (8.1%) 40.8 ± 36.5 28 17–55 t = 2.734 0.006
 Hyponatremia 28 (4.4%) 40.0 ± 23.0 35 21–56.5 t = 2.581 0.010
 Pressure ulcer 17 (2.7%) 75.0 ± 57.7 52 31.5–109.5 t = 4.521 0.000
 Deep venous thrombosis 10 (1.6%) 67.7 ± 57.4 51.5 20–108 t = 2.750 0.006
Operation t = 13.43 0.000
 Yes 339 (53.7%) 40.8 ± 37.0 28 21–49
 No 292 (46.3%) 22.8 ± 36.3 12 7–22

SD, standard deviation; IQR, interquartile range; MVC, motor vehicle collision; AIS, American Spinal Injury Association impairment scale.

*Independent samples t-test (t) or one-way analysis of variance (F) (performed on log-transformed LOS).

A Bonferroni post hoc test revealed significant differences between 15–30 and >75 (P < 0.05). All other subgroups were not significantly different from each other.

A Bonferroni post hoc test revealed significant difference between low-fall and MVC, high-fall, low-fall, low-fall, and struck by object (P < 0.05). All other subgroups were not significantly different from each other.

§On admission.

A Bonferroni post hoc test revealed no significant difference between AIS B and AIS C, AIS A and AIS B, AIS C, and AIS D. All other subgroups were significantly different from each other (P < 0.05).

**A Bonferroni post hoc test revealed that all subgroups were not significantly different from each other (P > 0.05).

The mean duration of hospitalization was 32.4 ± 37.7 days and ranged from 1 to 294 days. The median number of days of hospitalization was 21 days (the IQR was 11–37 days). Within 14 days of admission, 31.9% of patients were discharged; within 60 days, 88.6% were discharged. Table 1 summarizes the ACLOS for the different subgroups and the factors associated with prolonged hospitalization in univariate analysis. Based on univariate analysis, ACLOS was significantly associated with age, etiology, location of the hospital, ASIA impairment scale (AIS), associated injuries, surgery, and complications (P < 0.05). Table 2 summarizes the results of the association between ACLOS and the independent variables from the multivariable analysis. Having an operation was the strongest determinant of a longer ACLOS. A significantly longer LOS in patients was associated surgery, a urinary infection, a poor functional status, and hospitalization in a suburban hospital, compared to the LOS of patients without these factors (P < 0.01). A longer LOS in patients was associated with pressure ulcers and associated injuries, compared to the LOS of patients without these factors (P < 0.05). Etiology and age were not independent determinants of ACLOS.

Table 2.

Multiple regression analysis of the factors for ACLOS

Variables Unstandardized coefficients (β) Standardized coefficients (β) t value P value
Constant 1.892 8.967 0.000
Operation 0.333 0.402 11.354 0.000
Urinary infection 0.248 0.134 3.863 0.000
AIS 0.036 0.104 2.852 0.004
Location of hospital 0.086 0.092 2.658 0.008
Pressure ulcer 0.200 0.078 2.239 0.025
Associated injuries 0.070 0.074 2.154 0.032

AIS, American Spinal Injury Association impairment scale.

Discussion

This is the first study in China that aimed to identify the factors impacting the ACLOS for inpatients after a TSCI. The rising incidence of TSCI in the next few years will likely increase the demand for access to hospitalization. Identifying factors that impact inpatient ACLOS will allow better prediction of bed flow and access, will support effective resources allocation, and potentially will allow better care planning.

In the scientific literature, there are wide ranges and differences in ACLOS among various studies.17,1921 In this study, ACLOS was longer than that reported in other studies in Taiwan (8.5 ± 8.8 days in 2000–2003)17; in Canada (16.8 ± 21.6 days in 1997–2001 and 22.7 ± 32.8 days in 2003–2006)19,20; and in the United States (24 days in 1988–1990).21 Another survey of people with TSCI in a tertiary hospital in Nigeria during 1992–2006 revealed that the duration of hospital stay ranged from 2 weeks to 60 weeks with a mean of 12 weeks (SD = 8.6 weeks).22 The mean ACLOS was 48.8 days (SD = 45.2) during 2000–2003 in the Netherlands.4 This difference may be attributable to the following:

  1. Most LOS studies examined the difference by using the mean, rather than the median. LOS in acute care hospitalization data is skewed; therefore, the mean is less informative. This is one of the main reasons that the outcomes in LOS studies are inconsistent.

  2. Differences in the patients' characteristics or differences in the criteria used before discharging patients to rehabilitation centers or home may have contributed to the difference in ACLOS among the various studies.

  3. Differences between studies in the LOS must be considered within the context of the healthcare organization.

In China, the lack of rehabilitation centers is a significant issue that lengthened the ACLOS of the patients. Undertaken within a mixed public–private healthcare system with no national initiatives in place, the median ACLOS was also higher than figures from similar studies in the United States.

The ACLOS is often thought of as an indicator of the efficiency of the health service. Long periods of hospitalization increase costs and negatively affect the quality of life of patients. Our results demonstrated that having surgery, urinary infection, AIS, location of hospital, pressure ulcers, and associated injuries were significantly associated with ACLOS. The severity of the injury predicted inpatient ACLOS. This was not a surprising finding. Pickett et al.19 reports that patients with complete injuries (i.e. ASIA A classification) had a significantly longer mean LOS, compared to patients with incomplete injuries (i.e. ASIA categories B, C, and D; P < 0.008). Our finding of a longer ACLOS among patients with a greater degree of impairment at the time of admission supported this.

In this study, surgery was found to influence the patients' ACLOS. Surgery predicted a longer ACLOS because the patients who needed surgery had a greater degree of injury on admission. Surgical treatment causes additional trauma to the body, and more time should therefore be needed for recovery. However, Tator et al.23 report finding no significant difference between the surgical group and the nonsurgical group, although the LOS of the surgical group was a little longer. McKinley et al.24 have reported that spinal surgery is associated with a shorter LOS. Further research is necessary to analyze the independent influence of surgery on ACLOS.

In the current study, urban patients had a shorter ACLOS, compared to suburban patients. This finding may be explained by the influence of the medical environment. Previous research has suggested that the LOS was decreased in patients who underwent early surgery after an acute TSCI, especially if the procedure was performed within 24 hours following the trauma.25 In suburban hospitals, medical facilities are generally unaffordable for most people, resulting in surgical delay. Therefore, the treatment of TSCI patients in suburban hospitals was not as effective as the treatment given in urban hospitals. Furthermore, most urban hospitals are teaching hospitals in which the nursing care is more professional and skilled in providing services to patients. Many studies report that specialized centers of care for spinal cord injury could decrease the rehabilitation LOS.26,27 Early admission to an organized TSCI care system consistently reduces the LOS. Acute care hospitalization is reduced by almost 50% when patients are treated in a specialized short-term care center.27 As far as we know, there is no previous research that has elaborated the effect of hospital location on ACLOS. Further prospective research is needed to examine whether the ACLOS of inpatients in urban hospitals is shorter than that in suburban hospitals.

Our results indicated that the ACLOS of TSCI patients with associated injuries was conspicuously longer than that of patients with no associated injury; this finding was in agreement with previous reports.17 This may be because patients must reach a stable medical status with the resolution of all associated injuries before discharge to a rehabilitation center or home. This resulted in an additional LOS.

Previous studies have suggested that complications for TSCI tend to prolong the LOS. Previous research has shown that there is a marked increase in rehabilitation LOS after TSCI when comparing those patients experiencing complications (e.g. respiratory, gastrointestinal, thromboembolic complications, genitourinary complications, and pressure ulcers) with those patients without such complications.4,23 However, our study demonstrated that only urinary infections and pressure ulcers influenced the ACLOS. Therefore, future studies must focus on identifying whether complications could be associated with ACLOS.

Our study had a few limitations. First and foremost, it was a retrospective study and therefore there was a lot of dependence on the accuracy and completeness of documentation in the medical notes. Second, it was conducted in one geographical area in China and therefore it may not be possible to make generalizations about the results with regard to other countries or even the rest of China. Third, owing to the lack of data on insurance status, the relationship between ACLOS and the surgical time and time from the event were not interpreted in this study, although these factors would have contributed to the analyses of the ACLOS. Fourth, there were a lack of rehabilitation LOS and no survey about the place of discharge. Fifth, we only examined the effect of the epidemiological and clinical factors on ACLOS and did not identify the correlation between these factors (e.g. the AIS, surgery, location of hospital, and complications). Further research including these factors is obviously required. Overall, this exploratory study has provided valuable information for future prospective study in China with regard to better understanding the factors that impact the ACLOS for inpatients after a TSCI.

Conclusion

This study examines the effects of epidemiological and clinical factors on ACLOS in Tianjin, China. Surgery, AIS, urinary infection, location of hospital, pressure ulcers, and associated injuries were associated with a significant increase in ACLOS among the admitted TSCI patients. More studies are needed in China to determine the effect of these factors on the ACLOS of TSCI patients and to propose a predictive model.

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr Jiang Wenxue from Tianjin First Center Hospital, Dr Deng Shucai from Tianjin Hospital, Dr Zhang Xueli and Dr Tian Rong from Tianjin Union Medicine Centre, Dr Ni Dongkui from The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Dr Jiang Yi and Dr Jiang Han from Tianjin Third Central Hospital, Dr Wang Jinggui from Affiliated Hospital of Medical College of the Chinese People's Armed Police Forces, Dr Li Chaoying and Dr Wang Yongqing from Tianjin Fourth Center Hospital, Dr Xian Ruliang from Tianjin Fifth Center Hospital, Dr Su Lianshu from Tianjin Baodi Hospital, Dr Ma Yucang from Tianjin Jixian People's Hospital, Dr Yuan Tongqiang from Tianjin Wuqing People's Hospital, Dr Liu Xibu from Tianjin Jinghai Hospital, Dr Bo Lianhong from the Tianjin Ninghe People's Hospital, for help in the collection of record data. This study was supported by the grants from Key Technology Foundation of Tianjin Health Bureau (07KG2), National Natural Science Foundation of China (81070982), National Natural Science Foundation of China (81201400) and Research Foundation of Tianjin Health Bureau (09kz104), Tianjin Research Program of Application Foundation and Advanced Technology (10JCZDJC18800).

References

  • 1.Illis LS. Central nervous system regeneration does not occur. Spinal Cord 2012;50(4):259–63 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pickelsimer E, Shiroma EJ, Wilson DA. Statewide investigation of medically attended adverse health conditions of persons with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2010;33(3):221–31 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Whiteneck G, Gassaway J, Dijkers M, Backus D, Charlifue S, Chen D, et al. The SCIRehab project: treatment time spent in SCI rehabilitation. Inpatient treatment time across disciplines in spinal cord injury rehabilitation. J Spinal Cord Med 2011;34(2):133–48 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Post MW, Dallmeijer AJ, Angenot EL, van AFW, der Woude LH v. Duration and functional outcome of spinal cord injury rehabilitation in the Netherlands. J Rehabil Res Dev 2005;42(3):75–85 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Osterthun R, Post MW, van AFW. Characteristics, length of stay and functional outcome of patients with spinal cord injury in Dutch and Flemish rehabilitation centres. Spinal Cord 2009;47(4):339–44 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Al-Jadid M, Robert AA. An analysis of the length of stay in traumatic and non-traumatic spinal cord injured patients. A rehabilitation unit experience in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J 2010;31(5):555–59 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ronen J, Itzkovich M, Bluvshtein V, Thaleisnik M, Goldin D, Gelernter I, et al. Length of stay in hospital following spinal cord lesions in Israel. Spinal Cord 2004;42(6):353–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jang HJ, Park J, Shin HI. Length of hospital stay in patients with spinal cord injury. Ann Rehabil Med 2011;35(6):798–806 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lenehan B, Street J, Kwon BK, Noonan V, Zhang H, Fisher CG, et al. The epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury in British Columbia, Canada. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012;37(4):321–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Burnett DM, Kolakowsky-Hayner SA, 3rd GEV, Cifu DX. Spinal cord injury ‘outliers’: an analysis of etiology, outcomes, and length ofstay. J Neurotrauma 2000;17(9):765–72 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Scivoletto G, Morganti B, Molinari M. Early versus delayed inpatient spinal cord injury rehabilitation: an Italian study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86(3):512–16 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Labruyère R, Agarwala A, Curt A. Rehabilitation in spine and spinal cord trauma. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010;35(21):S259–62 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yang JF, Musselman KE. Training to achieve over ground walking after spinal cord injury: a review of who, what, when, and how. J Spinal Cord Med 2012;35(5):293–304 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ning GZ, Yu TQ, Feng SQ, Zhou XH, Ban DX, Liu Y, et al. Epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury in Tianjin, China. Spinal Cord 2011;49(3):386–90 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Feng HY, Ning GZ, Feng SQ, Yu TQ, Zhou HX. Epidemiological profile of 239 traumatic spinal cord injury cases over a period of 12 years in Tianjin, China. J Spinal Cord Med 2011;34(4):388–94 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wu Q, Li YL, Ning GZ, Feng SQ, Chu TC, Li Y, et al. Epidemiology of traumatic cervical spinal cord injury in Tianjin, China. Spinal Cord 2012;50(10):740–44 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chu D, Lee YH, Lin CH, Chou P, Yang NP. Prevalence of associated injuries of spinal trauma and their effect on medical utilization among hospitalized adult subjects – a nationwide data-based study. BMC Health Serv Res 2009;9:137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.DeVivo M, Biering-Sorensen F, Charlifue S, Noonan V, Post M, Stripling T, et al. International Spinal Cord Injury Core Data Set. Spinal Cord 2006;44(9):535–40 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pickett GE, Campos-Benitez M, Keller JL, Duggal N. Epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury in Canada. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006;31(7):799–805 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Couris CM, Guilcher SJ, Munce SE, Fung K, Craven BC, Verrier M, et al. Characteristics of adults with incident traumatic spinal cord injury in Ontario, Canada. Spinal Cord 2010;48(1):39–44 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Price C, Makintubee S, Herndon W, Istre GR. Epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury and acute hospitalization and rehabilitation charges for spinal cord injuries in Oklahoma, 1988–1990. Am J Epidemiol 1994;139(1):37–47 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Obalum DC, Giwa SO, Adekoya-Cole TO, Enweluzo GO. Profile of spinal injuries in Lagos, Nigeria. Spinal Cord 2009;47(2):134–37 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tator CH, Duncan EG, Edmonds VE, Lapczak LI, Andrews DF. Complications and costs of management of acute spinal cord injury. Paraplegia 1993;31(11):700–14 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.McKinley W, Meade MA, Kirshblum S, Barnard B. Outcomes of early surgical management versus late or no surgical intervention after acute spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85(11):1818–25 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Mac-Thiong JM, Feldman DE, Thompson C, Bourassa-Moreau E, Parent S. Does timing of surgery affect hospitalization costs and length of stay for acute care following a traumatic spinal cord injury? J Neurotrauma 2012;29(18):2816–22 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ploumis A, Kolli S, Patrick M, Owens M, Beris A, Marino RJ. Length of stay and medical stability for spinal cord-injured patients on admission to an inpatient rehabilitation hospital: a comparison between a model SCI trauma center and non-SCI trauma center. Spinal Cord 2011;49(3):411–15 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Parent S, Barchi S, LeBreton M, Casha S, Fehlings MG. The impact of specialized centers of care for spinal cord injury on length of stay, complications, and mortality: a systematic review of the literature. J Neurotrauma 2011;28(8):1363–70 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES