Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 May 15.
Published in final edited form as: Evolution. 2009 Nov 17;64(5):10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00898.x. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00898.x

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Conditions for the maintenance of sexually antagonistic polymorphism, relaxing the assumption of equal dominance in males and females in the autosomal case. For each case, polymorphism is maintained in the region between the matching lines (see legend to Fig. 1). (For comparison, with Rice’s dominance assumption, the range of sm/sf supporting an autosomal polymorphism would be vanishingly small in the weak selection case; with sf = 0.2, polymorphism would require that sm/sf lie between 0.8333 and 1.25).