Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Pathobiol Rep. 2013 Mar;1(1):9–18. doi: 10.1007/s40139-013-0009-8

Helicobacter, Inflammation, and Gastric Cancer

Antonia R Sepulveda
PMCID: PMC3655720  NIHMSID: NIHMS441767  PMID: 23687623

Abstract

Helicobacter pylori infection leads to long-lasting chronic inflammation and represents the most common risk factor underlying gastric cancer. Recently, new insights into the mechanisms through which H. pylori and mucosal inflammation lead to cancer development have emerged. H. pylori virulence factors, in particular specific CagA genotypes, represent main factors in gastric cancer, inducing altered intracellular signaling in epithelial cells. The chronic nature of H. pylori infection appears to relate to the VacA virulence factor and Th17/Treg mechanisms. A role of H. pylori infection in epigenetic and microRNA deregulation has been shown. Mutation of the epithelial cell genome, a hallmark of cancer, was demonstrated to accumulate in H. pylori infected stomach partly due to inadequate DNA repair. Gastric stem cells were shown to be targets of oxidative injury in the Helicobacter-inflammatory milieu. Recent advances emphasizing the contribution of bacterial factors, inflammatory mediators, and the host epithelial response in gastric carcinogenesis are reviewed.

Keywords: Helicobacter, H. pylori, Inflammation, Mutation, DNA repair, Gastric cancer, Stem cells, Pathobiology

Introduction

Gastric cancer (GC) is the most frequent malignancy arising in the stomach and represents the fourth most frequent cancer worldwide1. Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) bacteria were identified as the main agent of chronic gastritis and ulcers by Warren and Marshal2, and later studies revealed an association with GC3, leading to the classification of H. pylori as a human carcinogen4. The attributable risk of gastric cancer related to H. pylori infection in the population has been estimated to be 75%3.

Gastric cancers can be divided into distinct subtypes based on differential mechanisms of neoplastic initiation and underlying risk factors (inherited vs. sporadic), histopathologic, and molecular phenotypes. Sporadic type adenocarcinomas represent approximately 80% of all cases of GC and are associated with multifactorial causal factors, among which H. pylori chronic gastritis represents a main driving factor. Additionally, other factors known to play a role in GC development include host genetic susceptibility and carcinogens present in specific diets or smoking that work together with other factors such as the cellular injury caused by chronic gastritis to enhance the risk of gastric cancer5, 6. The molecular subtypes of gastric cancer include tumors characterized by the chromosomal instability pathway (CIN), the most frequent molecular type of GC, while a smaller proportion of tumors develop through the microsatellite instability pathway (MSI), or the CpG island methylator phenotype pathway7.

Gastric cancers are among the class of cancers that arise in association with chronic inflammation (chronic gastritis), as do other cancers in the gastrointestinal tract such as esophageal adenocarcinoma arising in association with reflux esophagitis and Barrett’s esophagus, and colon cancers that arise in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease). Although inflammation is a common factor in all these cancers, unique mechanisms that relate to specific factors involved in each type of cancer likely provide cancer signatures that may reflect the different underlying factors. To this end, in H. pylori associated GC, although inflammation is a major driver of neoplastic development, additional Helicobacter-specific induced alterations contribute to the landscape of molecular changes that may be unique to the H. pylori-cancer association. This notion is supported by studies showing that H. pylori bacteria affect epithelial cell regulation in the absence of inflammatory products as demonstrated in many co-culture studies, and the bacterium virulence factors, in particular the CagA protein, have been shown to induce a unique and complex array of cellular signaling alterations8 (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

H. pylori virulence factors and inflammation mechanisms leading to gastric cancer.

Role of H. pylori in Gastric Carcinogenesis: Patterns of Host Response

The chronic nature of H. pylori gastritis is critical to the carcinogenic potential of this infection, resulting in a long-term interaction of the bacteria and inflammatory mediators with gastric epithelial and epithelium progenitor and stem cells, with accumulation of mutations, epigenetic modifications and deregulation of cell function that may ultimately lead to neoplasia. Therefore, H. pylori infection plays a critical role during the initiating steps of gastric cancer. H. pylori infection is usually acquired during childhood, with ensuing chronic gastritis as the norm and various possible complications including gastric and duodenal ulcers, gastric cancer, and extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of mucosa associated lymphoid tissue (MALT-Lymphoma)9, 10. Cure of H. pylori infection requires treatment with anti-H. pylori therapy11. Gastric cancer develops several decades after acquisition of the infection, following progressive mucosal damage secondary to continued interaction of H. pylori bacteria with the mucosa and the consequent chronic inflammatory milieu12.

Histologically, H. pylori gastritis is characterized by a combination of chronic and acute inflammation of the gastric mucosa. There is progressive damage of gastric glands that leads to mucosal atrophy with intestinal metaplasia, overall resulting in a picture of atrophic gastritis, which constitutes an environment with enhanced risk of development of dysplasia and carcinoma. Extensive gastritis and mucosal atrophy in the gastric body and fundus lead to hypochlorhydria, which creates an environment that allows for overgrowth of other bacteria that may increase carcinogenic activity in the stomach through the conversion of nitrites to carcinogenic nitroso-N compounds13. H. pylori-associated pangastritis (involving both the body/fundus and antrum) is frequently seen in family relatives of gastric cancer patients, which may contribute to gastric cancer clustering in some families14. The histologic alterations that precede gastric cancer, including intestinal metaplasia, represent pre-neoplastic epithelial changes in gastric carcinogenesis and have been shown to carry numerous genomic, epigenetic and functional abnormalities that can also be detected in cancer tissues6, 1518. Therefore, characterization of molecular alterations in the background mucosa before patients develop GC may offer an opportunity to identify patterns associated with increased risk of GC development.

The cancers arising in the inflammatory background of H. pylori-associated chronic gastritis are most commonly of intestinal type, which are predominantly well-to moderately-differentiated adenocarcinomas, but diffuse type adenocarcinomas, which are poorly cohesive and poorly differentiated and may include a variable component with signet ring cell features, also occur in association with H. pylori19, 20.

H. pylori Infection and Inflammatory Host Response

H. pylori infection of the stomach elicits both humoral and cellular immune responses21. The induced immunologic/inflammatory cascade reflects the activation of innate and acquired immune responses21. The characteristic long-term chronic inflammatory status of H. pylori infected gastric mucosa requires evasion of H. pylori from the immune system. The immune response to H. pylori is induced by bacterial products upon their contact with epithelial cells of gastric mucosa, and with macrophages and dendritic cells in the lamina propria that are reached after epithelial cells and intercellular junctions are damaged by H. pylori virulence factors such as the VacA toxin. Epithelial cells respond to H. pylori by undergoing cellular signaling changes and by releasing cytokines into the mucosal lamina propria, to activate macrophages, dendritic cells and other inflammatory cells. Inflammatory mediators released during H. pylori gastritis include interleukin IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha and regulated and normal T cell expressed and secreted (RANTES)22. Mediators released by macrophages, dendritic cells and epithelial cells activate T-lymphocytes with a predominant Th1 response23, regulatory T-lymphocytes (Treg), B-lymphocytes which mature into mucosal plasma cells, and neutrophils which actively phagocytize H. pylori bacteria. In addition, there is a contribution of dentritic cells that release IL23 and activate the production of IL17 associated with a Th17 response against H. pylori 24. However, studies indicate that H. pylori direct a Treg-skewed dendritic cell-induced helper T-cell differentiation, in contrast to the Th17-skewed response seen with pro-inflammatory bacteria. The increased Treg induction in H. pylori infected–hosts forces an imbalance of the Th17/Treg axis, which may lead to suppressed Th17 and ineffective bacterial eradication and persistence of H. pylori as a chronic infection25.

H. pylori stimulates the production of growth factors such as granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factors (GM-CSF) and inflammation regulators such as cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) and reactive oxygen/nitrogen species (ROS/RNS).

NF-kB is a key regulator of inflammation and other cellular cascades that underlie carcinogenesis. NF-kB can be activated by numerous pro-inflammatory activators namely cytokines released by other cells and through Toll like receptor (TLR) activation by pathogen products, through two different pathways (the canonical and non-canonical pathways). H. pylori activation of NF-Kb follows either the canonical or non-canonical pathways in epithelial cells and lymphoid cells, respectively26. H. pylori peptidoglycan is recognized by epithelial cells through the intracellular nucleotide binding and oligomerization domain 1 (NOD1), activating MAPKs in both the NF-kB and AP1 pathways, leading to cytokine release27.

Inflammatory mediators that have been implicated in inflammation related cancer development include IL1-beta, tumor necrosis factor (TNF-alpha) and IL-6. Il1-beta and TNF-alpha induce activation of NF-kB in epithelial cells, leading to cell growth/proliferation, suppression of apoptosis, and release of other growth factors and cytokines such as EGF, IL-6, CO2 and ROS28. COX2 also enhances cell growth and angiogenesis, ROS modify protein function, IL6 activates STAT3 further enhancing cell growth and stimulating growth factor production including the Reg protein28,29,30. TNF-alpha and IL6 appear to create a positive feedback loop during cancer development, and also activate ERK/ MAPK cascades known to regulate cell proliferation, migration and angiogenesis31. In addition, IL1-beta, TNF-alpha and IL-6 activate c-Jun kinase (JNK) resulting in cell death induced compensatory proliferation28, 32,33.

Role of Stem Cells in H. pylori Associated Gastric Cancer Development

Gastric stem cells provide the capacity for renewal of all cell lineages of gastric epithelium. The molecular markers that identify epithelial stem cells in the oxyntic mucosa of gastric body and in the antrum appear to be different, consistent with the different cellular lineages that constitute gastric glands in these two different areas of the stomach34. Lgr5 was shown to mark epithelial stem cells in mice and human gastric antrum35,36, 37. In the oxyntic mucosa, trefoil factor family 2 (TFF2) was reported in progenitors for mucous neck, parietal and zymogen producing cells38. Another marker of progenitor cells in oxyntic mucosa may be doublecortin-like kinase (Dclk1)39. Other putative gastric stem cell markers are ADAM17, CD44, and Musashi-136, 40. Bone marrow derived stem cells may contribute to the gastric stem cell pool in chronic gastritis and H. pylori associated neoplastic progression41. It has been postulated that the engrafted bone marrow derived stem cells may not follow a normal differentiation pathway and could undergo uncontrolled replication, progressive loss of differentiation, and neoplastic behavior41, 42. In recent studies, we reported that the Lgr5-positive epithelial stem cell pool is expanded in H. pylori-associated gastritis in the antrum of patients with GC. In GC patients with active H. pylori infection, Lgr5-positive epithelial stem cells may be more susceptible to DNA damage than Lgr5-negative epithelial cells, demonstrated by increased levels of nuclear 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), suggesting that H. pylori infection may contribute to GC risk by affecting epithelial stem cells in the human stomach37.

The potential interactions of inflammatory products or H. pylori released factors or direct bacterial interactions with stem and progenitor cells remain unknown and warrant further studies.

H. pylori and Virulence Factors in Gastric Carcinogenesis

A number of H. pylori virulence factors play a role in determining the patterns of disease associated with infection8. These virulence factors include the vacuolating cytotoxin (VacA), cytotoxin-associated antigen A (CagA) proteins, HP-NAP, oipA, and dupA8. The VacA toxin affects T and B-lymphocytes and contributes to the ability of H. pylori to establish persistent chronic gastritis43. VacA induces ROS production and mitochondrial DNA mutation in gastric epithelial cells, while HP-NAP induces release of ROS from neutrophils33, 44.

The CagA protein is encoded by the cagA gene, one of the genes that constitute the Cag pathogenicity island, which encodes a type IV secretion system8. H. pylori strains carrying a cagA gene with specific structural variants have been shown to have a stronger association with GC8. The CagA type C strains were associated with more severe degrees of atrophic gastritis and gastric cancer45. H. pylori strains with phosphorylation at the EPYIA site of CagA proteins are more common in East-Asia than in Western countries, which may contribute to the increased incidence of gastric cancer in this region of the world46. There are several mechanisms by which CagA affects epithelial cells and may contribute to gastric cancer development46. CagA protein is injected from the bacterium into gastric epithelial cells via the type IV secretion system and then interacts with several intracellular signaling molecules in both tyrosine phosphorylation dependent and independent manners46. Once inside the epithelial cell CagA undergoes tyrosine phosphorylation by the epithelial cell Src protein and other signaling molecules at the EPIYA sites and binds Src homology 2 domain containing tyrosine phosphatase (SHP2), deregulating the phosphatase activity46. CagA-positive H. pylori induce higher levels of IL-8 and activate NF-kB, AP-1 and NFAT47.

CagA was shown to interact with the hepatocyte growth factor receptor Met causing sustained activation of PI3K and Akt which leads to b-catenin and NF-kB activation48. CagA was found to interact with TNF receptor associated factor 6 (TRF6) and TGF-beta-activating kinase 1 (TAK1) with resulting NF-kB activation33.

CagA related intracellular signaling potentially affects multiple cellular functions. For example, in our studies we showed that methylation of the O (6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) DNA repair gene was significantly associated with CagA-positive H. pylori strains in chronic gastritis, suggesting a role for CagA-positive H. pylori mediated effects in epigenetic regulation49. Other effects of CagA involve interference with proteasome-mediated degradation of the tumor suppressor RUNX3 and TP53 by binding ASPP2, a modulator of P53 and gene silencing of RUNX350,51.

Studies in mice carrying a transgenic cagA gene showed gastric epithelial hyperplasia and some mice developed gastric polyps and adenocarcinomas of the stomach and small intestine52, further supporting a role for CagA in gastric carcinogenesis.

Host genetic Susceptibility and H. pylori Associated Gastric Cancer

Although it is clear that development of GC is multifactorial and requires interaction with host susceptibility genetic factors, to date, only few host susceptibility factors have been confirmed, including the pro-inflammatory gene polymorphisms in IL-1beta and IL-1RN (receptor antagonist) genes which showed to increase the risk of hypochlorhydria, gastric atrophy, gastric cancer and neoplastic precursors in H. pylori infected patients53.

Molecular Alterations Driving H. pylori Associated Gastric Carcinogenesis

From the early stages of H. pylori gastritis, the infection and associated inflammation lead to epithelial cell mutations, epigenetic, microRNA and gene expression changes, genomic instability, altered cellular signaling, and imbalanced proliferation and apoptosis of gastric epithelial cells54, driving the progression from pre-neoplastic to neoplastic lesions6 (Figure 1).

Oncogene activation and loss of tumor suppressor gene function are well known mechanisms involved in development and maintenance of the cancer phenotype, and are in many instances caused by mutation or by epigenetic regulation, whether directly through hypermethylation of gene promoter regions or indirectly through epigenetic control of transcriptional or post-transcriptional regulators such as miRNAs. To establish a parallel, in cancers arising in inflammatory milieus, such as gastric cancer, mutagenesis and epigenetic deregulation are main mechanisms driving epithelial cells in the direction of cancer. Increased mutation burden of the epithelial genome results through two established mechanisms: 1) increased occurrence of mutations due to direct damage of DNA (free radicals, primarily ROS and NOS), that can be enhanced by aberrant expression of mutation inducing factor (AID) and 2) deficient repair of mutations prior to DNA replication (deficient DNA repair associated with reduced function of MGMT49 and mismatch repair (MMR) genes MLH1, MSH2 and MMR heterodimer associated proteins55 (Figure 1). Published data support that both mechanisms are critical for H. pylori and inflammation associated gastric cancer33, 49, 55. The link between enhanced mutation burden of gastric epithelium and Helicobacter gastritis can be found at multiple levels as reviewed below.

Mutations in Gastric Carcinogenesis

The types of mutations and mechanisms of mutagenesis in gastric carcinogenesis are multiple and include microsatellite instability (MSI) resulting from altered DNA mismatch repair, point mutations and genomic instability including loss of heterozygosity (LOH), gene amplifications, rearrangements, insertion and deletion mutations, chromosomal losses and duplications. These genomic lesions accumulate during the steps of gastric carcinogenesis in cells representing intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia/adenoma, and adenocarcinoma and probably in epithelial progenitors and stem cells56.

Through the combined effects of H. pylori virulence factors and inflammatory mediators released in response to infection, ROS levels increase in the cell and lead to modification of nucleic acid bases leading to DNA damage including single of double-stranded DNA breaks, DNA adducts and DNA protein cross links28.

Mutations of TP53 and APC genes can be detected in intestinal metaplasia and gastric dysplasia57, 58. TP53 mutations (in exons 5 to 8) characterized by G:C to A:T transitions are detected in gastric neoplasia58. APC mutations, including stop-codon and frameshift mutations were reported in 45% of cancers59. KRAS mutations in codon 12 are rare in gastric carcinogenesis and were reported in 14% of cases with atrophic gastritis, and about 10% of adenomas, dysplasias, and carcinomas60. Recently, the spectrum of mutations in gastric cancer has been explored by massive parallel sequencing approaches. A recent study performed whole exome sequencing in gastric cancer as compared to matching non-neoplastic tissue and determined the molecular pathways most frequently revealing gene mutations61. Chromatin modification and cell junction pathways showed the most significant enrichment of mutated genes. Mutations were found in members of the SWI-SNF complex (ARID1A, PBRM1 and SMARCC1), ISWI complex (SMARCA1) and NuRD complex (CHD3, CGD4 and MBD2), and other genes encoding histone-modifying proteins (SIRT1 and SETD2), affecting 59% of gastric cancers61. Overall, 59% of gastric cancers had mutations in genes involved in cell adhesion, including CHD1. Genes involved in cell cycle regulation including TP53, PTEN and TTK were mutated in 77% of gastric cancers. Other signaling pathways frequently mutated in gastric cancers included the Wnt-BMP-TGF-beta, axon guidance, MAPK, DNA replication, focal adhesion, ERBB, ATR-BRCA and Rb pathways61. Another study also using exome sequencing reported that cell adhesion was the pathway most enriched for mutations62. TP53 was mutated in 66.7%, and PIK3CA and ARIDI1A were mutated in 20% of gastric cancers62. Frequent mutations in chromatin remodeling genes (ARIDI1A, MLL3 and MLL) were found in 47% of gastric cancers62. ARIDI1A mutations where associated with PIK3CA mutations and microsatellite instability62. Importantly, some mutations identified in the advanced cancer stages, may have occurred early during initiation associated with H. pylori infection (such as MSI15) whereas other mutations occur late in cancer progression and are independent of H. pylori infection or inflammation induced by the bacterium.

As summarized in Figure 1, the mechanisms through which H. pylori-associated gastritis results in enhanced mutagenesis and cellular deregulation are multiple. The increased DNA damage of epithelial cells is due to oxidative stress caused by reactive oxygen species (ROS), and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) generated by inflammatory cells as well as by gastric epithelial cells after activation by H. pylori63. In addition to the increased production of ROS, there is limited availability of oxygen radical scavengers, such as glutathione and gluthatione-S-transferase during H. pylori gastritis, which may contribute to higher levels of oxygen radicals in the mucosa of infected patients64. Gastric mucosa with H. pylori gastritis, intestinal metaplasia and gastric atrophy as pre-neoplastic lesions, was shown to have increased levels of DNA 8OHdG, a marker for oxidative DNA damage65. Mutations associated with oxidative damage include point mutations in genes such as the tumor suppressor TP53, KRAS, and other genes involved in gastric carcinogenesis58. Epithelial expression of the activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) in H. pylori gastritis may induce C/G to T/A transitions by its cytidine deaminase activity28.

Specific deficiencies of DNA repair functions during H. pylori gastritis also contribute to H. pylori associated mutagenesis6, 49, 66, 67. Altered DNA repair mechanisms include those involved in DNA MMR as well as other proteins that primarily repair DNA lesions induced by oxidative and nitrosative stress, such as MGMT and polymorphic glycosylase (OGG1). DNA MMR proteins (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2) are required for the repair of DNA replication associated sequence errors. Several studies have reported a role for DNA MMR deficiency in mutation accumulation during H. pylori infection15, 37, 49, 55, 66. DNA mismatch repair deficiency leads to frameshift mutagenesis that can alter the coding region of genes, as well as repetitive regions known as short tandem repeats or microsatellite regions, with resulting microsatellite instability68. Microsatellite instability can be detected in chronic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia from patients with gastric cancer, indicating that MSI can occur in pre-neoplastic mucosa15, 56. For example, a study of microsatellite instability in the stepwise gastritis cancer sequence reported MSI in chronic gastritis (13% of cases), intestinal metaplasia (20% of cases), dysplasias (25% of cases) and gastric cancers (38% of cases), consistent with a role for DNA MMR deficiency in H. pylori associated gastric carcinogenesis69. Using a co-culture in vitro system, gastric cell lines exposed to H. pylori expressed reduced levels of DNA mismatch repair proteins MLH1 and MSH255, and these changes were associated with increased mutagenesis of a reporter vector, including MSI-type frameshift mutations as well as point mutations66. These studies provided definitive evidence that H. pylori bacteria lead to mutations in the epithelial cell genome, a hallmark of cancer.

High-level of MSI (MSI-H) is associated with loss of expression and promoter hypermethylation of the MLH1 DNA mismatch repair gene in gastric adenomas and cancers. MSI has been reported in 17–35% of gastric adenomas70, 71, and in 17 to 59% gastric carcinomas15, 7074. Gastric cancers with MSI-H may carry frameshift mutations that may affect the function of cancer related genes, such as BAX, IGFRII, TGF RII, MSH3 and MSH67579.

Other DNA repair proteins are involved in the correction of oxidative stress associated mutations during H. pylori infection such as repair of 8-OHdG by polymorphic glycosylase (OGG1). A gene polymorphism that may affect the function of OGG1 was reported frequently in patients with intestinal metaplasia and gastric cancer, suggesting that deficient OGG1 function may contribute to increased mutagenesis during gastric carcinogenesis80. The DNA repair protein MGMT can remove O (6)alkylG DNA adducts. In the absence of functional MGMT these adducts are not removed and mispair with T during DNA replication, resulting in G-to-A mutations. MGMT-promoter methylation has been reported in various stages of gastric carcinogenesis, suggesting a role for this DNA repair protein in gastric cancer development81. Hypermethylation of the MGMT gene and reduced levels of MGMT proteins in the gastric epithelium, particularly in patients infected with CagA-positive strains occur during H. pylori gastritis49. Further, in our studies, MGMT promoter methylation was shown to be partially reversible after eradication of H. pylori infection49. Overall, our studies indicate that MGMT-dependent DNA repair is disrupted during H. pylori gastritis, likely contributing to higher levels of mutagenesis in H. pylori infected gastric mucosa49.

The nucleotide alterations introduced by 8OHdG, a marker of oxidative DNA stress, are G/C to T/A transversions, and in earlier studies we demonstrated that these were the most common type of point mutations induced by H. pylori in a co-culture setting66, thus indicating that oxidative stress similar to that induced by inflammatory mediators can be replicated by H. pylori interacting with epithelial cells even in the absence of inflammation. If DNA repair is effective, the mismatch U:G caused by the 8OHG modification would be recognized by uracyl-DNA glycosylase or MSH2/MSH6 heterodimer and repaired. If DNA repair is not effective then these mutations are expected to accumulate, consistent with our studies showing impaired DNA repair associated with H. pylori infection49, 66, 67, 82. In addition other studies have shown that enhanced and aberrant activity of activation-induced cytidine daminase (AID) in gastric epithelium in the setting of H. pylori infection can lead to increased U:G mismatches further contributing to the number of unrepaired mismatches and increased T/A transitions28(Figure 1). Gene targets of AID enhanced mutagenesis in gastric cells include TP53, CDKN-2B-CDKN-2A (encoding p16, p15 and p14 suppressor proteins), and caused submicroscopic deletions with chromosome copy number losses involving the CDKN-2B-CDKN-2A locus28, 83.

Epigenetic Gene Regulation and H. pylori Associated Gastric Carcinogenesis

Epigenetic DNA modifications are inherited upon somatic cell replication and encompass CpG methylation and histone modifications. Methylation of CpG islands in promoter regions causes silencing of the downstream gene, whereas methylation within the coding region of a gene usually is associated with increased gene transcription. Cancers display regional hypermethylation of promoter regions and global hypomethylation. The extensive epigenetic alteration in the background mucosa that gives rise to dysplasia and cancers represents an epigenetic field defect in inflammation and infection associated cancers. CpG methylation occurs early in gastric carcinogenesis, affecting genes such as MLH 1, p14, p15, p16, E-cadherin, RUNX3, thromobospondin-1 (THBS1), tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 3 (TIMP-3), COX-2, and MGMT6, 16, 8488. Methylation of these and a number of other genes is associated with chronic inflammation in the gastric mucosa89. Pro-inflammatory interleukin-1-beta polymorphisms were shown to be associated with CpG island methylation of target genes such as the E-cadherin gene90. CpG methylation of the gastric mucosa has been shown to be partially reversible after eradication of H. pylori infection, supporting the notion that H. pylori and inflammatory mediators interfere with cellular mechanisms governing epigenetic regulation in gastric epithelium17, 17, 49, 91.

Role of MicroRNAs in H. pylori Associated Gastric Carcinogenesis

MicroRNAs have been shown to be involved in H. pylori associated diseases92. Increased expression of miR-21 was detected in H. pylori-infected gastric mucosa, as compared to noninfected tissue93, while miR-218-2 and miR7 were down-regulated94, 95. MicroR-204 downregulation was involved in aberrant Ras activation in gastric carcinogenesis96. MiR-155 may function as a negative regulator that helps fine-tune the inflammation response of H. pylori infection97.

Conclusions

New insights into the mechanisms through which H. pylori and mucosal inflammation lead to gastric cancer development have been unraveled in recent years. H. pylori virulence factors, in particular specific genotypes of CagA gene and VacA genes are important in carcinogenesis. Additional evidence has shown the role of chronic H. pylori infection in deregulation of epigenetic and microRNA molecular patterns and massively parallel sequencing has enabled the mutational mapping of gastric cancers, pointing to possible new candidate genes that may be evaluated next for a driver role in H. pylori and inflammation associated carcinogenesis. Mutation of the epithelial cell genome, a hallmark of cancer, has been demonstrated to accumulate in the gastric epithelium of H. pylori infected patients, through mechanisms that include active mutation burden in a milieu contaminated with oxygen radicals and the inability of adequate DNA repair that occurs during H. pylori infection. Stem cells of the stomach have been shown to be targets of oxidative damage in the Helicobacter-inflammatory environment. Future research taking advantage of massively parallel sequencing genomic technologies, integrated systems biology and computational approaches are promising new tools to advance our understanding of how H. pylori and the consequent inflammation ultimately induce cancer in a sub-population of infected patients. Molecular markers that can identify patients with a history of H. pylori infection and associate with significant risk of development of GC remain a major goal of research, as are predictive markers for GC prognosis, targeted therapies, and recurrence. Identification of potential combinatorial biomarkers based on the bacterial genotypes, inflammation, and host genetic and phenotypic profiles should provide much needed tools for screening, prevention, and treatment of gastric cancer and precursor lesions.

Footnotes

Disclosure No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as:

• Of importance

•• Of major importance

  • 1.Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55:74–108. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.55.2.74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Warren JR, Marshall B. Unidentified curved bacilli on gastric epithelium in active chronic gastritis. Lancet. 1983;1:1273–1275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Herrera V, Parsonnet J. Helicobacter pylori and gastric adenocarcinoma. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2009;15:971–976. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.03031.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.International Agency for Research of Cancer. Shistosomes, liver flukes and Helicobacter pylori.: IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 1994 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Palli D. Epidemiology of gastric cancer: an evaluation of available evidence. J Gastroenterol. 2000;35 Suppl 12:84–89. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gologan A, Graham DY, Sepulveda AR. Molecular Markers in Helicobacter pylori-Associated Gastric Carcinogenesis. Clin Lab Med. 2005;25:197–222. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2004.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sepulveda AR, Aisner D. Molecular basis of diseases of the gastrointestinal tract. In: Coleman WB, Tsongalis GJ, editors. Molecular pathology: the molecular basis of human disease. Academic Press; 2009. pp. 365–393. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yamaoka Y. Pathogenesis of helicobacter pylori-related gastroduodenal diseases from molecular epidemiological studies. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2012;2012:371503. doi: 10.1155/2012/371503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sepulveda A, Goyal A. Helicobacter and Gastric Neoplasms. In: Tan DaL G, editor. Advances in Surgical Pathology: Gastric Cancer. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2011. pp. 22–37. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Makola D, Peura DA, Crowe SE. Helicobacter pylori infection and related gastrointestinal diseases. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2007;41:548–558. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e318030e3c3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chey WD, Wong BC. Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of G. American College of Gastroenterology guideline on the management of Helicobacter pylori infection. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:1808–1825. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01393.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Asaka M, Sugiyama T, Nobuta A, et al. Atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia in Japan: results of a large multicenter study. Helicobacter. 2001;6:294–299. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-5378.2001.00042.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bertuccio P, Chatenoud L, Levi F, et al. Recent patterns in gastric cancer: a global overview. Int J Cancer. 2009;125:666–673. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sepulveda A, Peterson LE, Shelton J, et al. Histological patterns of gastritis in H. pylori-infected individuals with a family history of gastric cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:1365–1370. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05667.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Leung WK, Kim JJ, Kim JG, et al. Microsatellite instability in gastric intestinal metaplasia in patients with and without gastric cancer. Am J Pathol. 2000;156:537–543. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64758-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kang GH, Shim YH, Jung HY, et al. CpG island methylation in premalignant stages of gastric carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2001;61:2847–2851. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sepulveda AR, Jones D, Ogino S, et al. CpG methylation analysis--current status of clinical assays and potential applications in molecular diagnostics: a report of the Association for Molecular Pathology. J Mol Diagn. 2009;11:266–278. doi: 10.2353/jmoldx.2009.080125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mikata R, Yokosuka O, Fukai K, et al. Analysis of genes upregulated by the demethylating agent 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine in gastric cancer cell lines. Int J Cancer. 2006;119:1616–1622. doi: 10.1002/ijc.21968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Huang JQ, Sridhar S, Chen Y, et al. Meta-analysis of the relationship between Helicobacter pylori seropositivity and gastric cancer. Gastroenterology. 1998;114:1169–1179. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(98)70422-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sepulveda AR, Wu L, Ota H, et al. Molecular identification of main cellular lineages as a tool for the classification of gastric cancer. Hum Pathol. 2000;31:566–574. doi: 10.1053/hp.2000.6684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Robinson K, Argent RH, Atherton JC. The inflammatory and immune response to Helicobacter pylori infection. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2007;21:237–259. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2007.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.McGee DJ, Mobley HL. Pathogenesis of Helicobacter pylori infection. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2000;16:24–31. doi: 10.1097/00001574-200001000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Beigier-Bompadre M, Moos V, Belogolova E, et al. Modulation of the CD4+ T-cell response by Helicobacter pylori depends on known virulence factors and bacterial cholesterol and cholesterol alpha-glucoside content. J Infect Dis. 2011;204:1339–1348. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jir547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Khamri W, Walker MM, Clark P, et al. Helicobacter pylori stimulates dendritic cells to induce interleukin-17 expression from CD4+ T lymphocytes. Infect Immun. 2010;78:845–853. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00524-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Kao JY, Zhang M, Miller MJ, et al. Helicobacter pylori immune escape is mediated by dendritic cell-induced Treg skewing and Th17 suppression in mice. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:1046–1054. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.11.043. This study showed that H pylori directs Treg skewing through dendritic cell activation and inhibits Th17 immunity, allowing the chronic persistence of H. pylori infection which is critical for gastric carcinogenesis.
  • 26.Lamb A, Chen LF. The many roads traveled by Helicobacter pylori to NFkappaB activation. Gut Microbes. 2010;1:109–113. doi: 10.4161/gmic.1.2.11587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Allison CC, Kufer TA, Kremmer E, et al. Helicobacter pylori induces MAPK phosphorylation and AP-1 activation via a NOD1-dependent mechanism. J Immunol. 2009;183:8099–8109. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0900664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Chiba T, Marusawa H, Ushijima T. Inflammation-associated cancer development in digestive organs: mechanisms and roles for genetic and epigenetic modulation. Gastroenterology. 2012;143:550–563. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ziech D, Franco R, Pappa A, et al. Reactive oxygen species (ROS)--induced genetic and epigenetic alterations in human carcinogenesis. Mutat Res. 2011;711:167–173. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2011.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sekikawa A, Fukui H, Fujii S, et al. REG Ialpha protein mediates an anti-apoptotic effect of STAT3 signaling in gastric cancer cells. Carcinogenesis. 2008;29:76–83. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgm250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kanda K, Komekado H, Sawabu T, et al. Nardilysin and ADAM proteases promote gastric cancer cell growth by activating intrinsic cytokine signalling via enhanced ectodomain shedding of TNF-alpha. EMBO Mol Med. 2012;4:396–411. doi: 10.1002/emmm.201200216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chen F. JNK-induced apoptosis, compensatory growth, and cancer stem cells. Cancer Res. 2012;72:379–386. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lamb A, Chen LF. Role of the Helicobacter pylori-induced inflammatory response in the development of gastric cancer. J Cell Biochem. 2012 doi: 10.1002/jcb.24389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mills JC, Shivdasani RA. Gastric epithelial stem cells. Gastroenterology. 2011;140:412–424. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Barker N, Huch M, Kujala P, et al. Lgr5(+ve) stem cells drive self-renewal in the stomach and build long-lived gastric units in vitro. Cell Stem Cell. 2010;6:25–36. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2009.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Simon E, Petke D, Boger C, et al. The spatial distribution of LGR5+ cells correlates with gastric cancer progression. PLoS One. 2012;7:e35486. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Uehara T, Ma D, Yao Y, et al. H. pylori infection is associated with DNA damage of Lgr5-positive epithelial stem cells in the stomach of patients with gastric cancer. Digestive Diseases and Sciences. Sep 4; doi: 10.1007/s10620-012-2360-8. [Epub ahead of print]. This study for the fist time showed that gastric epithelail stem cells are targets of mutagenesis in the H. pylori and inflamamtory mileau. The Lgr5-positive epithelial stem cell pool was expanded in H. pylori-associated gastritis in the antrum of patients with GC. In GC patients with active H. pylori infection, Lgr5-positive epithelial stem cells may be more susceptible to DNA damage than Lgr5-negative epithelial cells, suggesting that H. pylori infection may contribute to GC risk by affecting epithelial stem cells in the human stomach.
  • 38.Quante M, Marrache F, Goldenring JR, et al. TFF2 mRNA transcript expression marks a gland progenitor cell of the gastric oxyntic mucosa. Gastroenterology. 2010;139:2018–2027. e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.May R, Sureban SM, Hoang N, et al. Doublecortin and CaM kinase-like-1 and leucine-rich-repeat-containing G-protein-coupled receptor mark quiescent and cycling intestinal stem cells, respectively. Stem Cells. 2009;27:2571–2579. doi: 10.1002/stem.193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Qiao XT, Gumucio DL. Current molecular markers for gastric progenitor cells and gastric cancer stem cells. J Gastroenterol. 2011;46:855–865. doi: 10.1007/s00535-011-0413-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Correa P, Houghton J. Carcinogenesis of Helicobacter pylori. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:659–672. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.06.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Giannakis M, Chen SL, Karam SM, et al. Helicobacter pylori evolution during progression from chronic atrophic gastritis to gastric cancer and its impact on gastric stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:4358–4363. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0800668105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Torres VJ, VanCompernolle SE, Sundrud MS, et al. Helicobacter pylori vacuolating cytotoxin inhibits activation-induced proliferation of human T and B lymphocyte subsets. J Immunol. 2007;179:5433–5440. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.8.5433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Huang XW, Luo RH, Zhao Q, et al. Helicobacter pylori induces mitochondrial DNA mutation and reactive oxygen species level in AGS cells. Int J Med Sci. 2011;8:56–67. doi: 10.7150/ijms.8.56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Yamaoka Y, Kodama T, Kashima K, et al. Variants of the 3' region of the cagA gene in Helicobacter pylori isolates from patients with different H. pylori-associated diseases. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:2258–2263. doi: 10.1128/jcm.36.8.2258-2263.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Handa O, Naito Y, Yoshikawa T. CagA protein of Helicobacter pylori: a hijacker of gastric epithelial cell signaling. Biochem Pharmacol. 2007;73:1697–1702. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2006.10.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Backert S, Naumann M. What a disorder: proinflammatory signaling pathways induced by Helicobacter pylori. Trends Microbiol. 2010;18:479–486. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2010.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Suzuki M, Mimuro H, Kiga K, et al. Helicobacter pylori CagA phosphorylation-independent function in epithelial proliferation and inflammation. Cell Host Microbe. 2009;5:23–34. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2008.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Sepulveda AR, Yao Y, Yan W, et al. CpG methylation and reduced expression of O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase is associated with Helicobacter pylori infection. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:1836–1844. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.12.042. This study highights the role of epigenetic regulation of the DNA repair protein MGMT in H. pylori infection underlying innefficent DNA repair in infected gastric mucosa which can contribute to the enhanced burden of tumorigenic mutational events in gastric epithelium during H. pylori-associated carcinogenesis.
  • 50.Buti L, Spooner E, Van der Veen AG, et al. Helicobacter pylori cytotoxin-associated gene A (CagA) subverts the apoptosis-stimulating protein of p53 (ASPP2) tumor suppressor pathway of the host. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:9238–9243. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1106200108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Tsang YH, Lamb A, Chen LF. New insights into the inactivation of gastric tumor suppressor RUNX3: the role of H. pylori infection. J Cell Biochem. 2011;112:381–386. doi: 10.1002/jcb.22964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Ohnishi N, Yuasa H, Tanaka S, et al. Transgenic expression of Helicobacter pylori CagA induces gastrointestinal and hematopoietic neoplasms in mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:1003–1008. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711183105. This study for the first time demonstrated an oncogenic activity of H. pylori virulence factor CagA in vivo.
  • 53.El-Omar EM, Carrington M, Chow WH, et al. Interleukin-1 polymorphisms associated with increased risk of gastric cancer. Nature. 2000;404:398–402. doi: 10.1038/35006081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Chattopadhyay R, Bhattacharyya A, Crowe SE. Dual regulation by apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease-1 inhibits gastric epithelial cell apoptosis during Helicobacter pylori infection. Cancer Res. 2010;70:2799–2808. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-4136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kim JJ, Tao H, Carloni E, et al. Helicobacter pylori impairs DNA mismatch repair in gastric epithelial cells. Gastroenterology. 2002;123:542–553. doi: 10.1053/gast.2002.34751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Kobayashi K, Okamoto T, Takayama S, et al. Genetic instability in intestinal metaplasia is a frequent event leading to well-differentiated early adenocarcinoma of the stomach. Eur J Cancer. 2000;36:1113–1119. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(00)00066-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Nakatsuru S, Yanagisawa A, Furukawa Y, et al. Somatic mutations of the APC gene in precancerous lesion of the stomach. Human Molecular Genetics. 1993;2:1463–1465. doi: 10.1093/hmg/2.9.1463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Shiao YH, Rugge M, Correa P, et al. p53 alteration in gastric precancerous lesions. Am J Pathol. 1994;144:511–517. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Lee HS, Choi SI, Lee HK, et al. Distinct clinical features and outcomes of gastric cancers with microsatellite instability. Mod Pathol. 2002;15:632–640. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.3880578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Hunt JD, Mera R, Strimas A, et al. KRAS mutations are not predictive for progression of preneoplastic gastric lesions. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001;10:79–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Wang K, Kan J, Yuen ST, et al. Exome sequencing identifies frequent mutation of ARID1A in molecular subtypes of gastric cancer. Nat Genet. 2011;43:1219–1223. doi: 10.1038/ng.982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Zang ZJ, Cutcutache I, Poon SL, et al. Exome sequencing of gastric adenocarcinoma identifies recurrent somatic mutations in cell adhesion and chromatin remodeling genes. Nat Genet. 2012;44:570–574. doi: 10.1038/ng.2246. This study illustrates the power of massively parallel sequencing technologies to identify key tumorigenic events in gastric cancers. Application to pre-neoplastic tissue analysis promises to unravel drivers of gastric carcinogenesis that may relate to H. pylori inflammation or other specific underlying factors.
  • 63.Shimada T, Watanabe N, Hiraishi H, et al. Redox regulation of interleukin-8 expression in MKN28 cells. Dig Dis Sci. 1999;44:266–273. doi: 10.1023/a:1026638014062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Verhulst ML, van Oijen AH, Roelofs HM, et al. Antral glutathione concentration and glutathione S-transferase activity in patients with and without Helicobacter pylori. Dig Dis Sci. 2000;45:629–632. doi: 10.1023/a:1005426130826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Farinati F, Cardin R, Degan P, et al. Oxidative DNA damage accumulation in gastric carcinogenesis. Gut. 1998;42:351–356. doi: 10.1136/gut.42.3.351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Yao Y, Tao H, Park DI, et al. Demonstration and Characterization of Mutations Induced by Helicobacter pylori Organisms in Gastric Epithelial Cells. Helicobacter. 2006;11:272–286. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-5378.2006.00408.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Park DI, Park SH, Kim SH, et al. Effect of Helicobacter pylori infection on the expression of DNA mismatch repair protein. Helicobacter. 2005;10:179–184. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-5378.2005.00309.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Umar A. Lynch syndrome (HNPCC) and microsatellite instability. Dis Markers. 2004;20:179–180. doi: 10.1155/2004/486032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Ling XL, Fang DC, Wang RQ, et al. Mitochondrial microsatellite instability in gastric cancer and its precancerous lesions. World J Gastroenterol. 2004;10:800–803. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i6.800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Kashiwagi K, Watanabe M, Ezaki T, et al. Clinical usefulness of microsatellite instability for the prediction of gastric adenoma or adenocarcinoma in patients with chronic gastritis. Br J Cancer. 2000;82:1814–1818. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.1999.1154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Abraham SC, Park SJ, Lee JH, et al. Genetic alterations in gastric adenomas of intestinal and foveolar phenotypes. Mod Pathol. 2003;16:786–795. doi: 10.1097/01.MP.0000080349.37658.5E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Lee JH, Abraham SC, Kim HS, et al. Inverse relationship between APC gene mutation in gastric adenomas and development of adenocarcinoma. Am J Pathol. 2002;161:611–618. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64216-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Hayden JD, Martin IG, Cawkwell L, et al. The role of microsatellite instability in gastric carcinoma. Gut. 1998;42:300–303. doi: 10.1136/gut.42.2.300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Sepulveda AR, Santos AC, Yamaoka Y, et al. Marked differences in the frequency of microsatellite instability in gastric cancer from different countries. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:3034–3038. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.01453.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Ottini L, Palli D, Falchetti M, et al. Microsatellite instability in gastric cancer is associated with tumor location and family history in a high-risk population from Tuscany. Cancer Res. 1997;57:4523–4529. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Yamamoto H, Sawai H, Perucho M. Frameshift somatic mutations in gastrointestinal cancer of the microsatellite mutator phenotype. Cancer Res. 1997;57:4420–4426. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Shinmura K, Tani M, Isogaki J, et al. RER phenotype and its associated mutations in familial gastric cancer. Carcinogenesis. 1998;19:247–251. doi: 10.1093/carcin/19.2.247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Myeroff LL, Parsons R, Kim SJ, et al. A transforming growth factor beta receptor type II gene mutation common in colon and gastric but rare in endometrial cancers with microsatellite instability. Cancer Research. 1995;55:5545–5547. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Chung YJ, Park SW, Song JM, et al. Evidence of genetic progression in human gastric carcinomas with microsatellite instability. Oncogene. 1997;15:1719–1726. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1201343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Farinati F, Cardin R, Cassaro M, et al. Helicobacter pylori, inflammation, oxidative damage and gastric cancer: a morphological, biological and molecular pathway. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2008;17:195–200. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e3282f0bff5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Park TJ, Han SU, Cho YK, et al. Methylation of O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase gene is associated significantly with K-ras mutation, lymph node invasion, tumor staging, and disease free survival in patients with gastric carcinoma. Cancer. 2001;92:2760–2768. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20011201)92:11<2760::aid-cncr10123>3.0.co;2-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Kim J, Leung W, Wu L, et al. Helicobacter pylori impairs DNA mismatch repair in gastric epithelial cells: a link with gastric carcinogenesis. Gastroenterology. 2000;118:A867. doi: 10.1053/gast.2002.34751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Matsumoto Y, Marusawa H, Kinoshita K, et al. Up-regulation of activation-induced cytidine deaminase causes genetic aberrations at the CDKN2b-CDKN2a in gastric cancer. Gastroenterology. 2010;139:1984–1994. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Toyota M, Ahuja N, Suzuki H, et al. Aberrant methylation in gastric cancer associated with the CpG island methylator phenotype. Cancer Res. 1999;59:5438–5442. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.To KF, Leung WK, Lee TL, et al. Promoter hypermethylation of tumor-related genes in gastric intestinal metaplasia of patients with and without gastric cancer. Int J Cancer. 2002;102:623–628. doi: 10.1002/ijc.10783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Waki T, Tamura G, Sato M, et al. Promoter methylation status of DAP-kinase and RUNX3 genes in neoplastic and non-neoplastic gastric epithelia. Cancer Sci. 2003;94:360–364. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2003.tb01447.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Kang GH, Lee S, Kim JS, et al. Profile of aberrant CpG island methylation along the multistep pathway of gastric carcinogenesis. Lab Invest. 2003;83:635–641. doi: 10.1097/01.lab.0000067481.08984.3f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Lee JH, Park SJ, Abraham SC, et al. Frequent CpG island methylation in precursor lesions and early gastric adenocarcinomas. Oncogene. 2004;23:4646–4654. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Kang GH, Lee HJ, Hwang KS, et al. Aberrant CpG island hypermethylation of chronic gastritis, in relation to aging, gender, intestinal metaplasia, and chronic inflammation. Am J Pathol. 2003;163:1551–1556. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63511-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Qian X, Huang C, Cho CH, et al. E-cadherin promoter hypermethylation induced by interleukin-1beta treatment or H. pylori infection in human gastric cancer cell lines. Cancer Lett. 2008;263:107–113. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2007.12.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Chan AO, Peng JZ, Lam SK, et al. Eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection reverses E-cadherin promoter hypermethylation. Gut. 2006;55:463–468. doi: 10.1136/gut.2005.077776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Belair C, Darfeuille F, Staedel C. Helicobacter pylori and gastric cancer: possible role of microRNAs in this intimate relationship. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2009;15:806–812. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02960.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Zhang Z, Li Z, Gao C, et al. miR-21 plays a pivotal role in gastric cancer pathogenesis and progression. Lab Invest. 2008;88:1358–1366. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2008.94. This study began to elucidate the potential contribution of microRNAs in H. pylori associated carcinogenesis, showing that miR 21 was significantly overexpressed in H. pylori-infected gastric mucosa, implying that overexpression of miR-21 in gastric cancer may be due in part to H. pylori infection.
  • 94.Volinia S, Calin GA, Liu CG, et al. A microRNA expression signature of human solid tumors defines cancer gene targets. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:2257–2261. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0510565103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Kong D, Piao YS, Yamashita S, et al. Inflammation-induced repression of tumor suppressor miR-7 in gastric tumor cells. Oncogene. 2012;31:3949–3960. doi: 10.1038/onc.2011.558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Lam EK, Wang X, Shin VY, et al. A microRNA contribution to aberrant Ras activation in gastric cancer. Am J Transl Res. 2011;3:209–218. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Xiao B, Liu Z, Li BS, et al. Induction of microRNA-155 during Helicobacter pylori infection and its negative regulatory role in the inflammatory response. J Infect Dis. 2009;200:916–925. doi: 10.1086/605443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES