Abstract
Rodent models of human disease are essential to obtain a better understanding of disease pathology, the mechanism of action underlying conventional treatments, as well as for the generation of novel therapeutic approaches. There are a number of rodent models of schizophrenia based on either genetic manipulations, acute or sub-chronic drug administration, or developmental disturbances. The prenatal methylazoxymethanol acetate (MAM) rodent model is a developmental disruption model gaining increased attention because it displays a number of histological, neurophysiological and behavioral deficits analogous to those observed in schizophrenia patients. This unit describes the procedures required to safely induce the MAM phenotype in rats. In addition, we describe a simple behavioral procedure, amphetamine-induced hyper-locomotion, which can be utilized to verify the MAM phenotype.
Keywords: Methylazoxymethanol Acetate, rodent model, schizophrenia, amphetamine, locomotor activity
INTRODUCTION
Preclinical models of schizophrenia are required to gain a better understanding of disease pathophysiology and the generation of new antipsychotic medications. One model which demonstrates alterations consistent with those observed in human schizophrenia patients is the methylazoxymethanol acetate (MAM) rodent model. It has been demonstrated that the gestational (day 17) administration of MAM recapitulates a developmental disruption leading to histological (Moore et al., 2006), neurophysiological (Lavin et al., 2005; Lodge et al., 2009; Lodge and Grace, 2007), and behavioral (Lodge et al., 2009; Lodge and Grace, 2007; Moore et al., 2006) deficits analogous to schizophrenia in humans (for review see: (Lodge and Grace, 2009). In addition, this model has been used to better understand disease pathology (Lodge and Grace, 2011), the mechanisms involved in current antipsychotic treatments (Perez and Lodge, 2012; Valenti et al., 2011) and has provided a model to examine potential novel therapeutic approaches (Gill et al., 2011; Perez et al., 2012). Here we describe the procedures required to safely generate the MAM phenotype and, furthermore, provide a behavioral approach (amphetamine-induced hyper-locomotion) that can be utilized to validate this model.
BASIC PROTOCOL 1: GENERATION OF MAM PHENOTYPE
The generation of the MAM phenotype is a relatively simple process, requiring a routine intraperitoneal injection; however, the process is complicated by the hazardous nature of MAM. Here we describe the procedure in sufficient detail to minimize exposure hazard and induce reproducible deficits in histopathology, neurophysiology and behavior.
NOTE: All protocols using live animals must first be reviewed and approved by the appropriate Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) and conform to governmental regulations regarding the care and use of laboratory animals.
NOTE: Methylazoxymethanol acetate is a toxic and carcinogenic compound and approval for its use should be obtained from the Institutional Environmental Health and Safety Committee. In addition, the use of this compound in an animal facility should be coordinated with appropriate Laboratory Animal Resources personnel to limit potential exposure.
Materials
Rats: Female, pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats - timed to be GD17 on a Friday (Vendor: Harlan)
Standard housing cages for rats
Housing room separated from colony with limited access.
Laboratory grade balance
Methylazoxymethanol Acetate (MRI Global Chemical Carcinogen Repository: Catalog # 213)
Sterile Saline
1 ml luer-lock syringes
25G needle
Biohazard sharps container
iohazard Bags
Personal Protective Equipment including – Latex gloves, Nitrile gloves, Lab coat, Eye Protection, and Mask
Bleach; 10%v/v in water
Cavicide disinfectant
Standard rat chow softened with tap water
Protocol steps
Rats should be ordered such that they are timed pregnant, gestational day 17 on a Friday. As MAM is a potent carcinogen, this ensures that the high period of exposure hazard occurs over a weekend where there is lower traffic through the animal facility.
If possible, timed pregnant female rats should be housed in a room/cubicle isolated from the general rodent population to limit exposure hazard to other investigations and animal care staff.
Methylazoxymethanol acetate is a liquid at room temperature with a density of 1.17g/ml and can be stored, protected from light, at −20°C.
All handling of MAM should be confined to a chemical fume hood lined with clean bench covers. Personal protective equipment including double gloves (latex over nitrile) lab coat (disposable Tyvek-style clothing can be used in lieu of a standard lab coat), eye protection, and mask are essential.
In an eppendorf tube, MAM should be diluted with sterile saline to a final concentration of 25mg/ml by adding 20μl of MAM to 936μl of saline. Aliquots of dilute (25mg/ml) MAM can be stored at −20°C until use.
All gloves, pipette tips, bench covers, as well as, the empty MAM stock vial should be placed in an appropriate biohazard bag for disposal by the institutional environmental health and safety office.
The diluted MAM solution should be placed in a secondary container for transport to the animal facility. Prior to administration of MAM, warning labels containing chemical and emergency information should be posted on both the rodent cages and the entrance to the animal room. Include the material safety data sheet (MSDS) and the dates of high-exposure hazard, three days following administration. Coordinate with LAR personnel to ensure that staff are aware of the potential health risks. It is prudent for the PI’s staff to take care of the rats for the period of high exposure hazard (three days).
-
Injections of MAM should occur late in the day (after 3pm) on gestational day 17. Personnel performing or assisting with MAM administration should don protective equipment as detailed above. Typically 4–6 pregnant rats are treated at a time with 50% receiving injections of saline and the others receiving MAM. MAM (25 mg/kg i.p.) or saline (1ml/kg i.p.) should be backfilled into a luer-lock syringe and administered into the peritoneum. Syringes should be immediately placed into a biohazard sharps container for disposal by the Institutional Environmental Health and Safety Office.
It should be noted that administration of MAM earlier than GD 17 will produce a dramatically different phenotype that does not adequately model that observed in schizophrenia patients. For example, MAM administration on GD 15 produces marked microcephaly and cortical dysplasias (Moore et al., 2006). Cage cards should be labeled with treatment (i.e. MAM or Saline) and micro-isolator lids should be placed on the cages. Water-softened rat chow (mash) can be placed at the bottom of each cage.
PI’s staff should check the rats daily over the weekend and replace food, water, and softened chow as warranted. It is essential to wear appropriate protective equipment (detailed above) when checking on the animals and replacing softened chow.
The cages should be changed by PIs staff on the Monday morning following MAM administration. Specifically, personal protective equipment should be worn and each pregnant dam should be transferred to a clean housing cage with fresh sawdust bedding. The contaminated bedding should be collected in biohazard bags and disposed of by the Institutional Environmental Health and Safety Office. The empty cages should be sprayed with bleach (10% v/v) and wiped clean with paper towel. Cages are further treated with Cavicide and wiped clean. Paper towel should be disposed alongside the bedding in the appropriate biohazard bag. Cages should then be given to LAR staff for further cleaning.
At this point, MAM-treated rats are no longer considered hazardous and can be housed with the general population under standard conditions.
The typical gestational period of a rat is 22 days (although this can vary) and, as such, pregnant female rats will typically give birth between Monday-Wednesday the week following MAM or saline administration. Rats should be monitored daily to determine date of birth.
Male offspring should be weaned on postnatal day 21 and female rats, including the mother, should be euthanized by IACUC approved methods.
Multiple litters of MAM- and saline- treated rats are typically examined as adults (>8weeks of age).
BASIC PROTOCOL 2: AMPHETAMINE-INDUCED HYPER-LOCOMOTION
An augmented response to psychomotor stimulants is consistently observed in schizophrenia patients (Lieberman et al., 1987), as well as, rodent models (Flagstad et al., 2004; Gill et al., 2011; Lodge and Grace, 2007; Moore et al., 2006; Perez et al., 2012). A consistent validation of the MAM model described above is the enhanced locomotor response to a relatively low dose of the psychomotor stimulant, amphetamine. Here we describe a simple behavioral task that can be used to confirm the MAM phenotype and that we have used as a correlate for changes in dopamine system function (Gill et al., 2011; Lodge and Grace, 2007; Perez et al., 2012). It should be noted that the enhanced sensitivity to low-dose amphetamine administration is only seen following puberty in MAM-treated rats (Moore et al., 2006), although augmented responses to higher doses may be present in pre-adolescent rats (unpublished observations).
NOTE: All protocols using live animals must first be reviewed and approved by the appropriate Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) and conform to governmental regulations regarding the care and use of laboratory animals.
NOTE: Amphetamine is a controlled substance requiring a Schedule II license from the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration, or equivalent, as well as local authorities. The use of amphetamine requires appropriate handling and record keeping to maintain compliance with federal, state and local laws.
Materials
Rats: Adult rats treated prenatally (GD 17) with either MAM or saline. 10–12 rats per group is typically required.
D-Amphetamine sulfate (Sigma - Aldrich)
Med Associates Rodent locomotor chamber (or equivalent)
1 ml luer-lock syringes
25G needle
Biohazard sharps container
Personal Protective Equipment including – Latex gloves & Lab coat
Laboratory grade balance
Protocol steps
All experiments following prenatal MAM or saline administration should be performed on rats spanning a number of different litters.
Adult rats should be used as differences in locomotor activity to low dose amphetamine are typically only observed following puberty in MAM-treated rats.
Rats treated prenatally with MAM or saline should be weighed and transported to the behavioral room where they are left to acclimate to the facility for a minimum of one hour. It is advisable for the room to be vacated for the duration of the behavioral experiment to minimize any potential confounds (i.e. freezing due to loud noises or sudden movement).
-
Following the acclimation period, rats are individually placed into a locomotor chamber where horizontal activity is monitored by beam breaks. Rats are permitted to explore for a period of 45 mins to examine baseline locomotor activity in the novel arena.
MAM-treated rats may have an increased baseline locomotor activity (see (Lodge and Grace, 2007; Perez et al., 2012)); however, baselines typically converge by 45 mins. -
During baseline recording, amphetamine is weighed and dissolved in saline at a concentration of 0.5mg/ml.
Amphetamine is a Scheduled (SII) drug and, as such, both a federal DEA license as well as state licenses are required. Amphetamine should be kept in a locked cabinet and should only be dispensed by those lab members listed on the DEA application. Exact quantities of amphetamine should be logged with a signature as required to maintain compliance with the record keeping responsibilities of the investigator. Immediately following baseline locomotor activity, all rats are administered amphetamine (0.5mg/kg, i.p.) and placed back into the locomotor arena where locomotor activity is recoded for an additional 45 mins.
We have recently added a second dose of amphetamine to our locomotor studies to provide a more complete examination of amphetamine-induced hyper-locomotion. Thus, a second aliquot of amphetamine is dissolved to a concentration of 2.0mg/ml.
After the locomotor response to 0.5mg/kg has been recorded, rats are immediately injected with a higher dose of amphetamine (2.0mg/kg i.p.) and locomotor activity is examined for a final 45 mins.
Data are analyzed by distance travelled and typically collapsed into 5 minute bins. Using this approach, MAM-treated rats consistently display an augmented locomotor response to the lower, 0.5mg/kg, dose of amphetamine.
COMMENTARY
Background Information
The gestational (day 17) administration of methylazoxymethanol acetate (MAM) recapitulates a developmental disruption leading to histological, neurophysiological and behavioral deficits analogous to schizophrenia in humans (for review see: (Lodge and Grace, 2009). Specifically, MAM-treated rats display subtle histopathologies including decreases in cortical thickness with corresponding increases in neuronal density (Moore et al., 2006) and decreases in parvalbumin expression (Lodge et al., 2009; Penschuck et al., 2006). While mirroring deficits in histopathology are relatively straight forward, it is impossible to directly measure symptoms of schizophrenia e.g., hallucination, delusion and thought disorder) in rodents. Thus, MAM-treated rats have been examined in variety of behavioral paradigms that are considered to be valid translational models due to similar measures of assessment in rats and humans. Specifically, deficits have been observed in sensorimotor gating (Le Pen et al., 2006; Moore et al., 2006; Talamini et al., 2000), latent inhibition (Lodge et al., 2009), cognitive function (Gastambide et al., 2011; Le Pen et al., 2006; Perez et al., 2012) and hyper-responsivity to psychomotor stimulants (Flagstad et al., 2004; Gill et al., 2011; Lodge and Grace, 2007; Moore et al., 2006; Perez et al., 2012). Furthermore, aberrant dopamine and hippocampal system function, consistently observed by imaging studies in patients (Abi-Dargham et al., 2009; Schobel et al., 2009), have been demonstrated by electrophysiological studies in MAM-treated rats (Lodge and Grace, 2011). Thus, prenatal MAM administration produces a developmental disruption leading to schizophrenia-like alterations, thus providing a unique model to examine pathophysiology and potential novel therapeutic advances. Indeed, this rodent model has been recently utilized to better understand mechanisms underlying current antipsychotic drug action (Perez and Lodge, 2012; Valenti et al., 2011) and has enabled the identification of potential novel pharmacological (Gill et al., 2011) and non-pharmacological (Perez et al., 2012) therapeutics for the treatment of schizophrenia.
Critical Parameters & Troubleshooting
Pregnant Females
It is imperative that the day of gestation, typically confirmed by the presence of a copulatory plug, be accurately determined. The optimal timing for MAM administration (in the context of schizophrenia) was determined to be GD 17 (Moore et al., 2006), as at this time neuronal proliferation has peaked in many cortical regions and is essentially complete in subcortical regions (Bayer and Altman, 1995). Indeed, consistent with the brain regions known to be altered in schizophrenia patients, MAM administration on GD 17 produces relatively selective effects on paralimbic frontal and temporal cortices (Moore et al., 2006).
Methylazoxymethanol Acetate
It should be remembered that MAM is a potent toxin and carcinogen (Ganote and Rosenthal, 1968; Smith, 1966; Zedeck et al., 1970). Thus, it is essential that all precautions detailed above be followed in order to decrease the risk of exposure hazard, not only to the people performing the MAM injections, but to also limit exposure to other investigators and animal care staff.
Amphetamine-Induced Hyper-locomotion
The augmented response to low-dose amphetamine is a consistent observation in MAM-treated rats (Flagstad et al., 2004; Gill et al., 2011; Lodge and Grace, 2007; Moore et al., 2006; Perez et al., 2012). It should be noted, however, that MAM-treated rats have been demonstrated to display an enhanced baseline locomotor response that may confound the interpretation of the amphetamine data. Thus, it is recommended that baseline activity be monitored for at least 45 mins in order for any observed differences in baseline distance travelled to reach convergence.
Anticipated Results
Following the above protocols should produce litters of approximately 8–12 MAM- or saline- treated offspring that can be used for molecular, anatomical, neurophysiological, or behavioral studies. We have included an additional protocol, amphetamine-induced hyper-locomotion, that is consistently reported to be augmented in MAM-treated rats when compared to prenatal saline-treated rats. It is anticipated that MAM-treated rats will display a statistically significant, enhanced locomotor response to the low (0.5mg/kg i.p.) dose of amphetamine. This observation is consistent with the enhanced response to psychostimulant administration observed in schizophrenia patients (Lieberman et al., 1987).
Time Considerations
The generation of MAM- and saline- treated rats typically requires a number of months so it is important to plan well in advance. We purchase timed-pregnant female rats that are treated with MAM or saline on the Friday following arrival. Animal care takes three days (high exposure hazard) and offspring are born approximately 4 days following administration. Weaning takes place three weeks later, on postnatal day 21, and rats are routinely housed until adulthood (>8weeks).
Following 1 hour acclimatization to the room, amphetamine-induced locomotion studies take 2.25 hours per rat to complete. However, multiple animals can be run at the same time in separate locomotor chambers. We typically run 4 rats at a time with a throughput of 16 – 20 rats per day.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Stephanie Perez for her helpful comments on this protocol. This work was supported by the NIH (MH090067).
LITERATURE CITED
- Abi-Dargham A, van de Giessen E, Slifstein M, Kegeles LS, Laruelle M. Baseline and Amphetamine-Stimulated Dopamine Activity Are Related in Drug-Naive Schizophrenic Subjects. Biol Psychiatry. 2009;65:1091–1093. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bayer SA, Altman J. Neurogenesis and neuronal migration. In: Paxinos G, editor. The Rat Nervous System. Academic Press; San Diego: 1995. pp. 1041–1078. [Google Scholar]
- Flagstad P, Mork A, Glenthoj BY, van Beek J, Michael-Titus AT, Didriksen M. Disruption of neurogenesis on gestational day 17 in the rat causes behavioral changes relevant to positive and negative schizophrenia symptoms and alters amphetamine-induced dopamine release in nucleus accumbens. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2004;29:2052–2064. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ganote CE, Rosenthal AS. Characteristic lesions of methylazoxymethanol-induced liver damage. A comparative ultrastructural study with dimethylnitrosamine, hydrazine sulfate, and carbon tetrachloride. Laboratory Investigation. 1968;19:382–398. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gastambide F, Cotel MC, Gilmour G, O’Neill MJ, Robbins TW, Tricklebank MD. Selective Remediation of Reversal Learning Deficits in the Neurodevelopmental MAM Model of Schizophrenia by a Novel mGlu5 Positive Allosteric Modulator. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2011 doi: 10.1038/npp.2011.298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gill KM, Lodge DJ, Cook JM, Aras S, Grace AA. A novel α5GABAAR-positive allosteric modulator reverses hyperactivation of the dopamine system in the MAM model of schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2011;36:1903–1911. doi: 10.1038/npp.2011.76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lavin A, Moore HM, Grace AA. Prenatal disruption of neocortical development alters prefrontal cortical neuron responses to dopamine in adult rats. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2005;30:1426–1435. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Le Pen G, Gourevitch R, Hazane F, Hoareau C, Jay TM, Krebs MO. Peri-pubertal maturation after developmental disturbance: A model for psychosis onset in the rat. Neuroscience. 2006;143:395–405. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lieberman JA, Kane JM, Alvir J. Provocative tests with psychostimulant drugs in schizophrenia. Psychopharmacology. 1987;91:415–433. doi: 10.1007/BF00216006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lodge DJ, Behrens MM, Grace AA. A loss of parvalbumin-containing interneurons is associated with diminished oscillatory activity in an animal model of schizophrenia. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2009;29:2344–2354. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5419-08.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lodge DJ, Grace AA. Aberrant hippocampal activity underlies the dopamine dysregulation in an animal model of schizophrenia. J Neurosci. 2007;27:11424– 11430. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2847-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lodge DJ, Grace AA. Gestational methylazoxymethanol acetate administration: A developmental disruption model of schizophrenia. Behav Brain Res. 2009;204:306–312. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.01.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lodge DJ, Grace AA. Hippocampal dysregulation of dopamine system function and the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences. 2011;32:507–513. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2011.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moore H, Jentsch JD, Ghajarnia M, Geyer MA, Grace AA. A neurobehavioral systems analysis of adult rats exposed to methylazoxymethanol acetate on E17: implications for the neuropathology of schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry. 2006;60:253–264. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.01.003. This seminal paper provides the first characterization of the MAM phenotype and its relevance to schizophrenia when administered at gestational day 17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Penschuck S, Flagstad P, Didriksen M, Leist M, Michael-Titus AT. Decrease in parvalbumin-expressing neurons in the hippocampus and increased phencyclidine-induced locomotor activity in the rat methylazoxymethanol (MAM) model of schizophrenia. European Journal of Neuroscience. 2006;23:279–284. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04536.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perez SM, Lodge DJ. Aberrant dopamine D2-like receptor function in a rodent model of schizophrenia. The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics. 2012 doi: 10.1124/jpet.112.193201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perez SM, Shah A, Asher A, Lodge DJ. Hippocampal deep brain stimulation reverses physiological and behavioral deficits in a rodent model of schizophrenia. The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012 doi: 10.1017/S1461145712001344. In Press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schobel SA, Lewandowski NM, Corcoran CM, Moore H, Brown T, Malaspina D, Small SA. Differential targeting of the CA1 subfield of the hippocampal formation by schizophrenia and related psychotic disorders. Archives of general psychiatry. 2009;66:938–946. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith DWE. Mutagenicity of cycasin aglycone (methylazoxymethanol), a naturally occurring carcinogen. Science. 1966;152:1273–1274. doi: 10.1126/science.152.3726.1273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Talamini LM, Ellenbroek B, Koch T, Korf J. Impaired sensory gating and attention in rats with developmental abnormalities of the mesocortex. Implications for schizophrenia. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000;911:486–494. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06751.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Valenti O, Cifelli P, Gill KM, Grace AA. Antipsychotic Drugs Rapidly Induce Dopamine Neuron Depolarization Block in a Developmental Rat Model of Schizophrenia. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2011;31:12330–12338. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2808-11.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zedeck MS, Sternberg SS, Poynter RW, McGowan J. Biochemical and pathological effects of methylazoxymethanol acetate, a potent carcinogen. Cancer Research. 1970;30:801–812. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
