Skip to main content
The Journal of Biological Chemistry logoLink to The Journal of Biological Chemistry
. 2013 Apr 11;288(20):14417–14427. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.442970

Wedelolactone, a Naturally Occurring Coumestan, Enhances Interferon-γ Signaling through Inhibiting STAT1 Protein Dephosphorylation*

Zhimin Chen ‡,1, Xiaoxiao Sun ‡,1, Shensi Shen , Haohao Zhang , Xiuquan Ma §, Jingli Liu , Shan Kuang , Qiang Yu ‡,2
PMCID: PMC3656297  PMID: 23580655

Background: IFN-γ inhibits tumor cell growth by activating STAT1.

Results: Wedelolactone specifically inhibited TCPTP, the major phosphatase of STAT1, prolonged IFN-γ-induced STAT1 phosphorylation, and enhanced the antitumor effect of IFN-γ.

Conclusion: Wedelolactone enhanced the antitumor effect of IFN-γ by inhibiting TCPTP-mediated STAT1 dephosphorylation.

Significance: We identified a novel antitumor drug candidate, a new target, and a new mechanism to develop novel anticancer therapeutics.

Keywords: Cytokines/Interferon, Phosphatase, STAT Transcription Factor, Tumor Suppressor Gene, Tumor Therapy

Abstract

Signal transducers and activators of transcription 1 (STAT1) transduces signals from cytokines and growth factors, particularly IFN-γ, and regulates expression of genes involved in cell survival/death, proliferation, and migration. STAT1 is activated through phosphorylation on its tyrosine 701 by JAKs and is inactivated through dephosphorylation by tyrosine phosphatases. We discovered a natural compound, wedelolactone, that increased IFN-γ signaling by inhibiting STAT1 dephosphorylation and prolonging STAT1 activation through specific inhibition of T-cell protein tyrosine phosphatase (TCPTP), an important tyrosine phosphatase for STAT1 dephosphorylation. More interestingly, wedelolactone inhibited TCPTP through interaction with the C-terminal autoinhibition domain of TCPTP. We also found that wedelolactone synergized with IFN-γ to induce apoptosis of tumor cells. Our data suggest a new target for anticancer or antiproliferation drugs, a new mechanism to regulate PTPs specifically, and a new drug candidate for treating cancer or other proliferation disorders.

Introduction

Signal transducers and activators of transcription 1 (STAT1) is a member of a family of seven proteins who function as both signal transducers and transcription factors. STAT1 mainly transduces signals from IFN-γ and growth hormones. STAT1-mediated interferon γ signaling activates the expression of genes critically involved in the inflammatory process, such as inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), COX2, vascular cell adhesion molecules (VCAMs), and intercellular cell adhesion molecules (ICAMs) (1).

In addition to its roles in inflammation, STAT1 also functions as a tumor suppressor (2, 3). Loss of STAT1 signaling has been found in a large group of diverse tumors. STAT1 knockout mice suffer a higher spontaneous rate of malignancy. Deficiency in STAT1 signaling also allows tumor cells to escape from IFN-γ-dependent immunosurveillance. As a result, STAT1 null mice develop more frequent and rapidly growing tumors when exposed to chemical carcinogens (4). STAT1 is also required for the growth inhibition effects of IFN-γ (5, 6). STAT1 regulates a wide spectrum of genes involved in cell cycle control, apoptosis, angiogenesis, cell invasion, metastasis, and immune recognition (7). STAT1 can trigger the expression of proapoptotic genes, such as caspases 2, 3, and 7, while suppressing the expression of antiapoptotic genes such as BCL2L1 and BCL2 (8).

STAT1 is activated through phosphorylation on tyrosine 701, mainly by JAKs, leading to STAT1 dimerization, nuclear translocation, and activation of target gene expression. Activated STAT1 can be negatively regulated through protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs).3 T-cell protein tyrosine phosphatase (TCPTP) has been reported to be involved in the inactivation of STAT1 in IFN-γ-treated cells (9). Because TCPTP exists in two isoforms, a nuclear form and a cytoplasmic form, it was speculated that TCPTP was involved in the dephosphorylation of STAT1 in both the nucleus and cytoplasm (9).

TCPTP is linked to the development of several inflammatory disorders, including type 1 diabetes, Crohn's disease, and rheumatoid arthritis (10, 11). Therefore, TCPTP regulators may serve as therapeutic agents. Efforts have been made to develop drugs against PTPs, but the highly conserved architectures of PTP active sites impede the development of selective PTP inhibitors (12). For example, TCPTP and PTP1B have a sequence identity of about 74% in their catalytic domains (13), although they clearly fulfill different biological functions (1416), suggesting that the protein sequences outside of the catalytic domains play important roles in determining the specificity of the PTPs. Indeed, TCPTP itself was reported to be regulated by an autoinhibition mechanism (17). In vitro studies using proteolytically cleaved fragments of TCPTP have demonstrated that the catalytic activity of TCPTP is regulated by an intramolecular inhibition involving a carboxy terminal segment of the 45-kD form of TCPTP (17), indicating that the carboxy terminal domain of TCPTP has an important regulatory role.

Wedelolactone is a coumestan isolated from Eclipta prostrata L., a medicinal herb that has been used in the treatment of infective hepatitis in Indian snake venom poisoning in Brazil (18). A collective work of different groups has demonstrated that wedelolactone has multiple biological effects, including inhibition of IκB kinase (IKK) activity in NF-κB signaling (18), Na+,K+-ATPase activities (19), and phospholipase A (2) activity in snake venom (20). It has also been found to inhibit NS5B RNA polymerase activity, which is critical for hepatitis C virus replication (21), suggesting a potential hepatoprotective activity (22). Recently, wedelolactone has also been found to have antitumor effects by both in vitro and in vivo studies in a wide range of tumor types. The growth inhibition effects of wedelolactone on tumor cells were believed to be accomplished through its inhibition of IKK (23, 24), the androgen receptor (25, 26), or topoisomerase II (27).

We identified wedelolactone as an enhancer of STAT1 signaling through screening of a natural compound library. We found that wedelolactone prolonged IFN-γ-induced STAT1 tyrosine phosphorylation by targeting TCPTP and inhibiting STAT1 dephosphorylation. In doing so, wedelolactone synergistically enhanced IFN-γ-induced apoptosis of tumor cells in a STAT1-dependent manner. Our findings revealed a novel drug target, a novel mechanism to regulate PTPs, and a novel mechanism against cell proliferation. Wedelolactone, particularly in combination with IFN-γ, may be a new strategy to treat cancer and other proliferation-related diseases.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

General Reagents

Wedelolactone was provided by Shanghai Ambrosia Pharmaceuticals, Inc. The tyrosine phosphatase inhibitor sodium orthovanadate and sodium fluoride were purchased from Sigma Aldrich. Stock solution of sodium orthovanadate was constituted in H2O at a concentration of 100 mm adjusted to pH10, boiled until it became translucent, and then the pH was readjusted to 10. Chemicals, if not specified, were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide. In experiments where cells were treated with the various inhibitors, the same volumes of corresponding solvents were used as controls. Human IFN-γ was purchased from Shanghai Tongren Yaofang, Inc. IL-6 was from BD Biosciences, human IFN-α was from Peprotech, and recombinant human EGF was from Invitrogen.

Cell Culture, Transfection, and Luciferase Gene Reporter Assay

HepG2, WiDr, A431, and A549 cells were purchased from the ATCC. A HepG2 cell line stably transfected with an interferon-gamma-activated sequence (GAS)-luciferase reporter gene was obtained from Dr. Xinyuan Fu of Indiana University. The cells, except HepG2, were maintained in DMEM (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum. HepG2 cells were cultured in α minimal essential medium (Invitrogen) with 10% fetal calf serum.

For transfection, cells were cultured to near confluence and transfected for 4 h with various plasmids using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). Cells were trypsinized and cultured for 24 h after transfection. An equal number of cells was collected for various assays. The luciferase activity was measured with a luminometer using a luciferase assay system (Promega).

RNA Extraction and RT-PCR

Total cellular RNA was extracted from cells using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). Reverse transcription and PCR were performed as follows. Briefly, 5 μg of total cellular RNA from each sample was reverse-transcribed using Maloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (MBI). The first-strand cDNA was diluted 1:10 as the PCR template. The PCR rTaq polymerase mixture was prepared according to the instructions of the manufacturer (Takara). PCR primers for the different genes were designed as follows: SOCS1, 5′-CCCCTTCCAGATTTGACCG-3′ (sense) and 5′-TGAAGAGGTAGGAGGTGCGAGT-3′ (antisense); IP-10, 5′-CCTCCAGTCTCAGCACCAT-3′ (sense) and 5′-AGCAGGGTCAGAACATCC-3′ (antisense); IL-8, 5′-CAGTTTTGCAAGGAGTGCTAA-3′ (sense) and antisense 5′-AACTTCTCCACAACCC TCTGC-3′ (antisense); and GAPDH, 5′-ACCACAGTCCATGCCATCAC-3′ (sense) and 5′-TCCACCACCCTGTTGCTG-3′ (antisense).

IFN-γ Receptor Binding Assay

Suspended HepG2 cells were pretreated with vehicle or wedelolactone for 20 min and then incubated with FITC-IFN-γ (30,000 IU/ml) for another 70 min, followed by analysis using FACScan flow cytometric analysis (BD Biosciences).

Antibodies and Immunoblotting Analysis

The mouse monoclonal antibody to phosphotyrosine (4G10) was obtained from Upstate Biotechnology. Anti-p-STAT1 (Tyr-701) antibody, anti-STAT1 antibody, anti-p-STAT3 (Tyr-705) antibody, anti-STAT3 antibody, anti-p-ERK (Thr-202/Tyr-204) antibody, anti-ERK antibody, anti-EGFR antibody, anti-p-JAK1 (Tyr-1022/1023) antibody, anti-p-JAK2 (Tyr-1007/1008) antibody, and anti-JAK1 antibody were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. Anti-α-tubulin antibody and anti-JAK2 antibody were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. Anti-p-EGFR (Tyr-1068) was purchased from BioSourse. All antibodies purchased commercially were used as recommended by the manufacturers.

For immunoblotting analysis, cells were lysed in 1× Laemmli sample buffer (Sigma Aldrich) and boiled for 5 min. Proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE (8%), transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane, and blocked by incubation for 60 min at room temperature with 5% (w/v) nonfat dry milk in TBS containing 0.1% Tween 20 (TBST). All the membranes were incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies diluted in TBST with 5% BSA. The membranes were then washed and incubated for 1 h at room temperature with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (Promega). Immune complexes were detected by ECL (Pierce).

In Vitro Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase Assay

Cells were washed three times with ice-cold PBS and lysed in 1% Triton X-100 lysis buffer (50 mm Hepes (pH 7.2), 5 mm EDTA, 0.25 mm sucrose, and 1% Triton X-100) containing protease and serine phosphatase inhibitors, including 1 mm PMSF, 1 mm NaF, and protease inhibitor mixture (Sigma Aldrich). Samples were incubated on ice for 30 min and centrifuged at 14,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C to remove insoluble material. The supernatants were transferred into fresh tubes, and protein concentrations were determined using a Bradford protein assay kit (Bio-Rad). Equal amounts of protein lysates (10 μg) were used for the PTP enzymatic assay, resuspended in 35 μl of reaction buffer (100 mm Hepes (pH7.0), 150 mm NaCl, 1 mm EDTA, and 5 mm DTT) with 10 mm para-nitrophenyl phosphate (Sigma Aldrich) as substrate. The reactions were incubated at 30 °C with rocking for different time periods, and 2 volumes of 1N NaOH stop solution were added. The absorbance was measured by a microplate reader (Molecular Devices) at a wavelength of 405 nm.

A leukocyte antigen-related tyrosine phosphatase assay kit (catalog no. AK-815) was purchased from Enzo Lifesciences. The purified human recombinant leukocyte antigen-related cytoplasmic domain (1275–1613) was used as the enzyme, and a synthetic 12-mer peptide on the basis of the regulatory autophosphorylation region of the IR b subunit cytoplasmic domain (1142–1153) served as the substrate. All the experiments were performed according to the instructions of the manufacturer.

The TCPTP fluorometric assay kit was from Abnova. Recombinant human TCPTP (full-length, 1–387) was used as the enzyme, and the fluoro-phospho-substrate, which comprised a unique PTP substrate containing a phosphor group, served as the substrate. All experiments were performed according to the instructions of the manufacturer. The SHP-2 and TCPTP catalytic domain assays were performed by the National Center for Drug Screening (Shanghai, China).

RNA Interference

The siRNA sequences were derived from the coding sequence of each protein. TCPTP siRNA, 5′-GAUUGACAGACAA CUAAUATT-3′ (sense) and 5′-UAUUAGUUGUCUGUCAAUCTT-3′ (antisense) and a random sequence control siRNA were synthesized by Genepharma (Shanghai, China). The synthetic siRNA was transfected into HepG2 cells using DharmaFECT1 (Dharmacon). To achieve the maximal effect, the siRNA-transfected cells were cultured to confluence and then trypsinized and reseeded into dishes. The luciferase activity was measured by a luminometer using a luciferase assay system (Promega).

Cell Viability Assay

Cells were seeded in a 96-well plate and, after treatment with the indicated drugs for the indicated times, 20 μl of MTT solution (5 mg/ml, Sigma Aldrich) was added to each well and incubated for 3 h at 37 °C. The supernatant was aspirated, and the MTT-formazan crystals formed by metabolically viable cells were dissolved in 150 μl of dimethyl sulfoxide. Finally, the absorbance was monitored by a microplate reader (Molecular Devices) at a wavelength of 570 nm.

STAT1 in Vitro Dephosphorylation Assay

HepG2 cells were washed with ice-cold PBS and lysed with HEST buffer (50 mm Hepes (pH7.2), 5 mm EDTA, 0.25 m sucrose, and 1% Triton X-100) containing protease and serine phosphatase inhibitors, 1 mm PMSF, 1 mm NaF, and protease inhibitor mixture (Sigma Aldrich). Samples were incubated on ice for 30 min, harvested, and centrifuged for 10 min at 4 °C (14,000 × g) to remove insoluble material. The supernatants were transferred into fresh tubes and served as “enzyme lysates.” HepG2 cells treated with 100 IU/ml IFN-γ were lysed in the same way as above and served as “substrate lysate.” Before mixing with the enzyme lysates, the substrate lysate was denatured in a boiling water bath for 5 min and then incubated on ice for another 5 min. The enzyme lysates and substrate lysate were then mixed in equal volume and incubated at 35 °C with agitation for the indicated time. The reactions were terminated by adding half-volume Laemmli 2× sample buffer (Sigma Aldrich), followed by boiling at 100 °C for 5 min, and then subjected to Western blot analysis.

RESULTS

Wedelolactone Increases IFN-γ/STAT1-mediated Promoter Activity

We used a cell-based promoter-reporter assay system, p-GAS-HepG2, which is a HepG2 cell line stably transfected with a STAT1-responsible promoter-reporter (p-GAS-luciferase) plasmid (see “Experimental Procedures”), to identify compounds that enhance IFN-γ/STAT1 signaling. We screened about 1000 traditional Chinese medicinal herb extracts using the assay and identified a natural compound, wedelolactone, from E. prostrata L. as a potent IFN-γ/STAT1 signaling enhancer (Fig. 1). Treatment of the p-GAS-HepG2 cells with wedelolactone increased the IFN-γ-induced luciferase reporter activity in a dose- and time-dependent manner (Fig. 1, a and b). The EC50 of the enhancement was about 20 μm, and the maximum enhancement was about 6- to 7-fold that of the control (Fig. 1a). The induction time course indicated that both the magnitude and the duration of the IFN-γ-induced luciferase activity were increased (Fig. 1b).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1.

Wedelolactone increased IFN-γ/STAT1-mediated promoter activity. a, p-LUC-HepG2 cells were stimulated with 1000 IU/ml IFN-γ plus vehicle or wedelolactone (Wed) at the indicated concentrations, and luciferase activity was measured following stimulation of IFN-γ for 6 h. The indicated treatment was compared with IFN-γ treatment alone by Student's t test. **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.0001. Data are mean ± S.E. of a representative experiment performed in triplicate. b, p-LUC-HepG2 cells were stimulated with 1000 IU/ml IFN-γ plus vehicle or 50 μm wedelolactone, and luciferase activity was measured after stimulation of IFN-γ for the indicated time. Data are mean ± S.E. of a representative experiment performed in triplicate. DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide. c, HepG2 cells were stimulated with 1000 IU/ml IFN-γ plus vehicle or 50 μm wedelolactone. After the indicated time, cells were harvested for total RNA followed by RT-PCR analysis of three indicated IFN-γ response genes: IP-10, SOCS1, and IL-8. Densitometric quantification of the indicated genes normalized to GAPDH was graphed.

To ensure that the increased luciferase activity by wedelolactone was indeed due to the increased STAT1 activity, we analyzed the effects of wedelolactone on the expression of three endogenous IFN-γ-induced STAT1 target genes: IP-10, SOCS1, and IL-8. The mRNA levels of all three genes we tested were increased by wedelolactone treatment (Fig. 1c). These data collectively demonstrate that wedelolactone enhances IFN-γ/STAT1 signaling.

Wedelolactone Does Not Affect the Binding of IFN-γ to Its Receptor

To investigate the mechanisms of wedelolactone in enhancing the IFN-γ/STAT1 signaling, we first tested whether wedelolactone played a role in the ligand-receptor interaction. We increased the concentration of IFN-γ in the presence or absence of the same concentration of wedelolactone (Fig. 2a). Wedelolactone alone had very little effect on luciferase activity, suggesting that wedelolactone did not act as a ligand (supplemental Fig S1). Maximum luciferase activity was achieved when the concentration of IFN-γ reached 1000 IU/ml, suggesting saturation of IFN-γ receptor. Wedelolactone had similar enhancing effects on different concentrations of IFN-γ, suggesting that wedelolactone does not affect the binding of IFN-γ to its receptor (Fig. 2a). To confirm this, we examined the effects of wedelolactone on the binding of IFN-γ to its receptor directly by using the FITC-labeled IFN-γ, which allowed us to detect IFN-γ binding using flow cytometry. Wedelolactone treatment had no effect on the binding of IFN-γ to cells (Fig. 2b), although the FITC-labeled IFN-γ seemed to have a relatively low binding affinity. These results suggest that the enhancing effect of wedelolactone on the IFN-γ-induced luciferase activity may be not through affecting IFN-γ-receptor interactions.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2.

Wedelolactone enhanced IFN-γ/STAT1 signaling by prolonging STAT1 tyrosine phosphorylation. a, p-LUC-HepG2 cells were stimulated with IFN-γ at the indicated concentrations plus vehicle or 50 μm wedelolactone, and luciferase activity was measured following stimulation of IFN-γ for 6 h. Data are mean ± S.E. of a representative experiment performed in triplicate. DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; ns, not significant. b, the effects of wedelolactone (Wed) on binding of IFN-γ to its receptors. Suspended HepG2 cells were incubated with FITC-labeled IFN-γ plus vehicle or 50 μm wedelolactone for 60 min, followed by analysis using flow cytometry. c and d, HepG2 cells were stimulated with IFN-γ plus vehicle or 50 μm wedelolactone for various lengths of time (c, 0–120 min; d, 0–8 h) as indicated. Whole cell lysates were processed for Western blot analysis and probed with the indicated antibodies. e, HepG2 cells were stimulated with IFN-γ plus vehicle or wedelolactone at various concentrations as indicated. After 2-hour treatment, whole cell lysates were subjected to Western blot analysis. Densitometric quantification of tyrosine phosphorylated STAT1 normalized to total STAT1 compared with IFN-γ alone was graphed (right panel).

Wedelolactone Enhances IFN-γ/STAT1 Signaling by Prolonging STAT1 Tyrosine Phosphorylation

We next analyzed the effects of wedelolactone on tyrosine phosphorylation of JAK1, JAK2, and STAT1, which are the upstream signaling events in response to the IFN-γ stimulation. Wedelolactone did not affect the tyrosine phosphorylation of JAK1 or JAK2 (Fig. 2c), nor the initial phosphorylation of STAT1 (c), but significantly prolonged the duration of STAT1 tyrosine phosphorylation. The IFN-γ-induced phosphorylation of STAT1 was a transient event that began to decrease 1–2 h after stimulation (Fig. 2, c and d). The STAT1 phosphorylation was sustained more than 8 h in the presence of wedelolactone (Fig. 2d). The effect of wedelolactone on STAT1 phosphorylation was also dose-dependent (Fig. 2e), consistent with its effect on the STAT1 promoter activity (Fig. 1a). It appeared that wedelolactone did not affect the IFN-γ-induced phosphorylation of STAT1 but prevented or slowed down its decrease after stimulation.

Wedelolactone Specifically Enhances IFN-γ Signaling

To address whether the enhancing effect of wedelolactone is specific for IFN-γ signaling, we tested the effects of wedelolactone on IFN-α, IL-6, or EGF signaling. HepG2 cells were stimulated with IFN-α, IL-6, or EGF in the presence or absence of wedelolactone, and the phosphorylation status of their downstream proteins was analyzed. There were no obvious effects of wedelolactone on IFN-α-induced STAT1/3 tyrosine phosphorylation (Fig. 3a), IL-6-induced STAT3/ERK phosphorylation, or the level of GP130 (b), nor on EGF-induced EGFR/ERK phosphorylation (c). These data strongly suggest that the enhancing effect of wedelolactone is specific on IFN-γ signaling.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3.

Wedelolactone specifically enhanced IFN-γ signaling. a–c, HepG2 cells were stimulated with IFN-α (a), IL-6 (b), EGF plus vehicle (c), or 50 μm wedelolactone (Wed) for various lengths of time (a, 0–180 min; b, 0–240 min; c, 0–240 min) as indicated. Whole cell lysates were processed for Western blot analysis and probed with the indicated antibodies.

Wedelolactone Enhances IFN-γ Signaling through Inhibition of STAT1 Dephosphorylation

Because slowdown of the deduction of STAT1 phosphorylation can be achieved either through activating its kinases or inhibiting its phosphatases, we performed a pause-chase experiment to distinguish between these two possibilities. HepG2 cells were stimulated with IFN-γ for 30 min followed by addition of a general kinase inhibitor, staurosporine, to inhibit further phosphorylation of STAT1 by its kinases (28). Wedelolactone, as well as the general PTP inhibitor vanadate, could still prolong the duration of STAT1 phosphorylation in the presence of staurosporine (Fig. 4a), suggesting that wedelolactone acts through inhibiting STAT1 dephosphorylation rather than enhancing its phosphorylation.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4.

Wedelolactone regulated IFN-γ signaling through inhibiting STAT1 dephosphorylation. a, HepG2 cells were stimulated with 100 IU/ml IFN-γ plus vehicle, wedelolactone (Wed), or vanadate at various concentrations, as indicated, for 30 min, followed by an addition of 150 nm staurosporine. After 30 min of chasing with staurosporine, the whole cell lysates were processed for Western blot analysis and probed with the indicated antibodies. Tyrosine-phosphorylated STAT1 normalized to total STAT1 compared with IFN-γ alone was quantitated densitometrically and graphed (right panel). b, in vitro dephosphorylation of p-STAT1 in cell lysates mixed with wedelolactone at various concentrations as indicated. DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide. c, HepG2 cells were stimulated with 100 IU/ml IFN-γ plus vehicle or 50 μm wedelolactone for various lengths of time as indicated. The levels of general tyrosine phosphorylation in whole cell lysates were analyzed by Western blot analysis using 4G10 antibody. 500 μm vanadate (Van) served as a positive control. d, whole cell lysates from HepG2 cells were mixed with vanadate or wedelolactone at various concentrations, as indicated, and proceeded to a para-nitrophenyl phosphate in vitro dephosphorylation assay. Data are means ± S.E. of a representative experiment performed in triplicate and analyzed by analysis of variance. ***, p < 0.0001.

To clarify that wedelolactone is indeed a STAT1 phosphatase inhibitor, we analyzed the effects of wedelolactone on STAT1 in vitro dephosphorylation using an in vitro dephosphorylation assay (29). The substrate cell lysate containing the phosphorylated STAT1 was prepared by treating HepG2 cells with IFN-γ. In parallel, the enzyme cell lysate was prepared from the untreated HepG2 cells. Equal amounts of the substrate cell lysate and the enzyme cell lysate were mixed together to allow in vitro dephosphorylation. STAT1 dephosphorylation could be observed after 30 min of incubation. Wedelolactone dose-dependently inhibited STAT1 in vitro dephosphorylation (Fig. 4b). Taken together, these results demonstrate that wedelolactone serves as a PTP inhibitor in the regulation of IFN-γ signaling.

To address whether wedelolactone is a general PTP inhibitor, we analyzed the effects of wedelolactone on general protein tyrosine phosphorylation in HepG2 cells and compared them with those of a general PTP inhibitor, vanadate. Vanadate increased the general tyrosine phosphorylation level in HepG2 cells as expected, whereas wedelolactone had no obvious effects on general tyrosine phosphorylation but significantly enhanced STAT1 phosphorylation, demonstrating that wedelolactone is not a general tyrosine phosphatase inhibitor (Fig. 4c).

We also examined the effects of wedelolactone on protein dephosphorylation in vitro using whole cell lysates and para-nitrophenyl phosphate as the substrate. Vanadate again inhibited the in vitro phosphatase activities of the whole cell lysate in a dose-dependent manner, whereas wedelolactone had no effect (Fig. 4d). These results collectively indicate that wedelolactone is not a general PTP inhibitor, in contrast to vanadate.

Wedelolactone-enhanced STAT1 Phosphorylation Is TCPTP-dependent, and Wedelolactone Is a Specific TCPTP Inhibitor

TCPTP has been reported as the major phosphatase involved in STAT1 dephosphorylation in IFN-γ signaling (9). We then examined the role of TCPTP in wedelolactone-enhanced STAT1 phosphorylation. We overexpressed TCPTP in p-GAS-HepG2 cells (Fig. 5a) and analyzed the effects of TCPTP overexpression on IFN-γ-induced luciferase activity in the presence or absence of wedelolactone. Overexpression of TCPTP reduced IFN-γ-induced luciferase activity, as expected, and decreased the enhancing effects of wedelolactone (Fig. 5a), suggesting that an increased level of TCPTP can counterbalance wedelolactone-enhanced IFN-γ signaling.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5.

Wedelolactone prolonged IFN-γ-induced STAT1 phosphorylation through TCPTP. a, p-LUC-HepG2 cells were mock-transfected or transfected with the TCPTP pMT2 plasmid 24 h before being stimulated with IFN-γ plus vehicle or 50 μm wedelolactone, and luciferase activity was measured following stimulation of IFN-γ for 6 h. IFN-γ plus 500 μm vanadate served as a positive control. Data are mean ± S.E. of a representative experiment performed in triplicate and analyzed by Student's t test. b, p-LUC-HepG2 cells were transfected with control siRNA or TCPTP siRNA 72 h before being stimulated with IFN-γ plus vehicle or 50 μm wedelolactone, and luciferase activity was measured following stimulation of IFN-γ for 6 h. IFN-γ plus 500 μm vanadate served as a positive control. Data are mean ± S.E. of a representative experiment performed in triplicate and analyzed by Student's t test. c, transfection efficiencies in a and b were tested by Western blot analysis using TCPTP antibody. d, HepG2 cells were transfected with control siRNA or TCPTP siRNA 72 h before being stimulated with IFN-γ plus vehicle or 50 μm wedelolactone (Wed) for various lengths of time as indicated. Whole cell lysates were processed for Western blot analysis and probed with the indicated antibodies. IFN-γ plus 250 μm vanadate (Van) served as a positive control. e, wedelolactone was tested for its inhibitory effect on in vitro PTP activity of various PTPs as described under “Experimental Procedures.” Each value is mean ± S.E. of a representative experiment performed in triplicate. LAR, leukocyte antigen-related phosphatase.

To confirm the role of TCPTP in mediating the effects of wedelolactone, we performed reciprocal experiments by knocking down TCPTP expression in p-GAS-HepG2 cells using TCPTP-specific siRNA (Fig. 5b). Luciferase activity was increased in TCPTP, knocking down p-GAS-HepG2 cells compared with the mock control. The effects of wedelolactone were almost completely abolished in TCPTP-deficient cells, strongly suggesting that wedelolactone targets TCPTP to modulate IFN-γ-induced STAT1 phosphorylation (Fig. 5b). The efficiency of overexpression and knocking down TCPTP were evaluated with Western blot analysis (Fig. 5c)

Similar results in STAT1 dephosphorylation were obtained by knocking down TCPTP in HepG2 cells (Fig. 5d). The dephosphorylation of STAT1 was inhibited by knocking down TCPTP, and the enhancing effects of both of wedelolactone and vanadate on STAT1 phosphorylation were reduced profoundly (Fig. 5c), again suggesting that TCPTP is the target of wedelolactone in enhancing IFN-γ-induced STAT1 phosphorylation.

To confirm that Wedelolactone is indeed a TCPTP inhibitor, we examined the effect of wedelolactone on TCPTP activity in vitro using purified enzymes. Wedelolactone efficiently inhibited the phosphatase activity of the full-length TCPTP (amino acids 1–387) in vitro (Fig. 5e) although it had no obvious effects on the activities of two control phosphatases: leukocyte antigen-related (LAR) and SHP-2 (e).

Interestingly, wedelolactone had much less of an effect on inhibiting the phosphatase activity of the TCPTP catalytic fragment (amino acids 2–346) (Fig. 5e), suggesting that the C-terminal domain of the TCPTP is required for wedelolactone to inhibit the catalytic activity of the TCPTP. Moreover, the inhibition of wedelolactone on the full-length TCPTP was not complete and reached a plateau after a 10 μm concentration of wedelolactone (Fig. 5e). These data strongly suggest that wedelolactone is a specific inhibitor of TCPTP and that it specifically interacts with the C-terminal domain of TCPTP.

Wedelolactone Synergizes with IFN-γ to Induce Tumor Cell Death

IFN-γ has been known to induce apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in certain tumor cells (30). We therefore examined whether prolonged STAT1 tyrosine phosphorylation by wedelolactone could enhance the ability of IFN-γ to induce cell death or cell cycle arrest in tumor cells. Wedelolactone synergized with IFN-γ, to different extents, to induce cell death in the hepatocarcinoma cell line HepG2 (Fig. 6a), the colon cancer cell line WiDr (b), and the epidermoid carcinoma cell line A431NS (c) but had no effect on the hepatocarcinoma cell line 97H (d) (31), which lacks the STAT1 protein (e). These data suggest that wedelolactone enhances the antitumor activity of IFN-γ in a STAT1-dependent manner.

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6.

Synergistic effect of IFN-γ and wedelolactone in tumor cell viability reduction. a–d, different tumor cell lines were treated with wedelolactone (Wed) alone or together with 1000 IU/ml IFN-γ at various concentrations. After HepG2 cell (24 h) (a); WiDr cell (72 h) (b); A431NS cell (36 h) (c); or 97H cell (72 h) (d) treatment, cells proceeded to an MTT assay. Each value is mean ± S.E. of a representative experiment performed in triplicate. Data were analyzed by Student's t test. The first two columns in each histogram are control cells (unfilled column) and cells treated with IFN-γ only (filled column). ns, not significant. e, 97H cells were stimulated with 100IU/ml IFN-γ or 20 ng/ml IL-6 as indicated. 30 min after stimulation, whole cell lysate of 97H cells was harvested and analyzed by Western blot analysis with the indicated probes.

DISCUSSION

STATs mediate important signals from cytokines, growth factors, and the extracellular matrix to regulate diverse biological activities. STAT phosphorylation is a nodal point for regulating STAT-mediated signaling. The collective work of multiple research groups has uncovered complex molecules and mechanisms regulating STATs phosphorylation, including kinases (32), phosphatases (9, 33, 34), conformational reorientation (35, 36), and scaffold proteins (37). We know a great deal about the function and regulation of the kinases and phosphorylation of STATs and have developed various compounds to target the kinases that inhibit STAT signaling for treating STAT signaling-related diseases (3840). However, we know very little about the function and regulation of the phosphatases and dephosphorylation of STATs. There have been no compounds developed to target the dephosphorylation of STATs. Here we report the identification of wedelolactone, a natural compound from E. prostrata L. that interfered with the dephosphorylation of STAT1. Wedelolactone specifically prolonged IFN-γ-induced STAT1 phosphorylation by inhibiting the TCPTP-dependent dephosphorylation of STAT1 and synergized with IFN-γ in inducing cell death among certain STAT1-expressing tumor cells. Our results suggest that wedelolactone acts as a TCPTP-specific inhibitor to inhibit the dephosphorylation of STAT1 after IFN-γ stimulation and enhances the biological effects of IFN-γ.

The transient activation of STAT1 after IFN-γ stimulation has been noticed before (28), but the biological significance of the regulation of the duration of STAT1 phosphorylation has not been revealed. STAT1 regulates hundreds of genes with diverse biological activities. The level and duration of the STAT1 activation may have a significant impact on the biological outcome of STAT1-mediated signaling. Indeed, inhibition of STAT1 dephosphorylation by wedelolactone facilitated the antitumor function of IFN-γ in several tumor cell lines (Fig. 6), demonstrating the biological significance of the duration of STAT1 phosphorylation.

IFN-γ is a multifunctional cytokine that is involved in many diseases, including cancer (4143), tuberculosis (44), hepatitis (45), and rheumatoid arthritis (46). IFN-γ1b was approved for the treatments of chronic granulomatous disease and adult T cell leukemia (47). Much effort has been made to explore its therapeutic potential to treat cancer. It has been shown that certain genotoxic agents could sensitize cells in response to very low doses of either interferon-α or γ through activation of STAT1 (48). Enhanced STAT1 phosphorylation caused by a mutation in the SH2 domain of STAT2 promoted type I IFN-induced apoptosis (49). Therefore, increased STAT1 phosphorylation appears to be a valid strategy to induce the cell death of tumor cells, and wedelolactone is a unique chemical modulator of IFN-γ signaling to enhance the biological functions of the cytokine in clinical use.

TCPTP (gene name PTPN2) was originally cloned from a human peripheral T cell cDNA library (50). Human PTPN2 is located within chromosomal region 18p11.2–11.3 (51), where it is thought to be associated with susceptibility to three autoimmune diseases: Crohn's disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and type 1 diabetes (10). TCPTP is also involved in many signaling pathways, including EGF signaling (52), IFN-γ signaling (9), and cell cycle regulation (53). Efforts have been made to develop specific small molecule inhibitors for TCPTP (12, 54). However, the highly conserved catalytic domains of PTPs remain a challenge for developing specific small molecule inhibitors for PTPs (13, 55). It has been reported that TCPTP can be regulated through conformational changes mediated by the extracellular matrix (56, 57) In vitro studies using a proteolytically cleaved fragment of TCPTP have suggested that the catalytic activity of TCPTP is regulated by an intramolecular inhibition involving a carboxy terminal segment of TCPTP (17). In this regard, our finding that wedelolactone specifically inhibited the phosphatase activity of full-length TCPTP but not that of the C terminus-deleted TCPTP suggests that wedelolactone may interact with amino acid residues within the C-terminal regulatory domain of TCPTP to influence the catalytic activity of TCPTP. Further detailed understanding of the interactions of wedelolactone with TCPTP will uncover a new strategy to develop specific TCPTP inhibitors. Wedelolactone holds enormous potential to be a novel drug candidate for the treatment of various TCPTP-related diseases.

Compared with its effects on IFN-γ signaling, Wedelolactone only showed a mild effect on IFN-α-induced phosphorylation of STAT1 (Fig. 3a). This result suggests that the inactivation of STAT1 after IFN-α and IFN-γ stimulation are distinct. IFN-α treatment leads to STAT1 and STAT2 heterodimer formation, whereas IFN-γ treatment results in STAT1 homodimer formation. The conformation of phosphorylated STAT1 has been shown to be a crucial factor in facilitating enzyme-substrate interaction during its dephosphorylation (36). Therefore, dephosphorylation of STAT1 in these two specific dimers could be regulated by distinct mechanisms. Wedelolactone could interfere with the dephosphorylation of the STAT1 homodimer but not with the STAT1/STAT2 heterodimer.

Several studies have shown that wedelolactone alone could induce growth arrest and apoptosis in several cancer cell lines through targeting IKK (23, 24), the androgen receptor (25, 26), or topoisomerase II (27), which is consistent with our observations (Figs. 6, a–c). However, Wedelolactone could achieve a higher efficacy in inducing grow inhibition of tumor cells when combined with IFN-γ, confirming that the STAT pathway is an important target of wedelolactone in inhibiting tumor cell growth.

In conclusion, we identified wedelolactone as a potent enhancer of IFN-γ/STAT1 signaling. Wedelolactone specifically enhances IFN-γ-induced STAT1 phosphorylation by inhibiting STAT1 phosphatase TCPTP, possibly interacting with the C-terminal autoinhibitory domain of TCPTP. In doing so, wedelolactone facilitates IFN-γ to induce tumor cell death. Our results revealed a new strategy to target TCPTP and IFN-γ/STAT1 signaling and uncovered a new drug candidate to treat cancer and other proliferation-related diseases.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Xinyuan Fu for HepG2 cells stably transfected with p-GAS-luciferase, Dr. N. K. Tonks for the human TC-PTP plasmid, and the National Center for Drug Screening (Shanghai, China) for help with the PTP activity assays.

*

This work was supported by China Ministry of Science and Technology Key New Drug Creation and Manufacturing Program Grant 2013ZX09102015; by China Ministry of Science and Technology Research Grant 2013ZX10002010-009; by China National Natural Science Foundation Grants 31129004, 91129701, and 91213304; and by National Science and Technology 973 Grants 2012CB910704 and 2013CB910900.

Inline graphic

This article contains supplemental Fig. S1.

3
The abbreviations used are:
PTP
protein tyrosine phosphatase
TCPTP
T cell protein tyrosine phosphatase
IKK
IκB kinase
GAS
interferon-gamma-activated sequence
MTT
3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Horvath C. M. (2000) STAT proteins and transcriptional responses to extracellular signals. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25, 496–502 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Battle T. E., Frank D. A. (2002) The role of STATs in apoptosis. Curr. Mol. Med. 2, 381–392 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Stephanou A., Latchman D. S. (2003) STAT-1. A novel regulator of apoptosis. Int. J. Exp. Pathol. 84, 239–244 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Kaplan D. H., Shankaran V., Dighe A. S., Stockert E., Aguet M., Old L. J., Schreiber R. D. (1998) Demonstration of an interferon γ-dependent tumor surveillance system in immunocompetent mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95, 7556–7561 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Bromberg J. F., Horvath C. M., Wen Z., Schreiber R. D., Darnell J. E., Jr. (1996) Transcriptionally active Stat1 is required for the antiproliferative effects of both interferon α and interferon γ. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93, 7673–7678 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Buard A., Vivo C., Monnet I., Boutin C., Pilatte Y., Jaurand M. C. (1998) Human malignant mesothelioma cell growth. Activation of Janus kinase 2 and signal transducer and activator of transcription 1α for inhibition by interferon-γ. Cancer Res. 58, 840–847 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Chin Y. E., Kitagawa M., Su W. C., You Z. H., Iwamoto Y., Fu X. Y. (1996) Cell growth arrest and induction of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21 WAF1/CIP1 mediated by STAT1. Science 272, 719–722 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Huang Y. Q., Li J. J., Karpatkin S. (2000) Thrombin inhibits tumor cell growth in association with up-regulation of p21(waf/cip1) and caspases via a p53-independent, STAT-1-dependent pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 6462–6468 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. ten Hoeve J., de Jesus Ibarra-Sanchez M., Fu Y., Zhu W., Tremblay M., David M., Shuai K. (2002) Identification of a nuclear Stat1 protein tyrosine phosphatase. Mol. Cell Biol. 22, 5662–5668 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium (2007) Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls. Nature 447, 661–678 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Todd J. A., Walker N. M., Cooper J. D., Smyth D. J., Downes K., Plagnol V., Bailey R., Nejentsev S., Field S. F., Payne F., Lowe C. E., Szeszko J. S., Hafler J. P., Zeitels L., Yang J. H., Vella A., Nutland S., Stevens H. E., Schuilenburg H., Coleman G., Maisuria M., Meadows W., Smink L. J., Healy B., Burren O. S., Lam A. A., Ovington N. R., Allen J., Adlem E., Leung H. T., Wallace C., Howson J. M., Guja C., Ionescu-Tîrgoviste C., Simmonds M. J., Heward J. M., Gough S. C., Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium, Dunger D. B., Wicker L. S., Clayton D. G. (2007) Robust associations of four new chromosome regions from genome-wide analyses of type 1 diabetes. Nat. Genet. 39, 857–864 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Zhang S., Chen L., Luo Y., Gunawan A., Lawrence D. S., Zhang Z. Y. (2009) Acquisition of a potent and selective TC-PTP inhibitor via a stepwise fluorophore-tagged combinatorial synthesis and screening strategy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 13072–13079 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Iversen L. F., Moller K. B., Pedersen A. K., Peters G. H., Petersen A. S., Andersen H. S., Branner S., Mortensen S. B., Moller N. P. (2002) Structure determination of T cell protein-tyrosine phosphatase. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 19982–19990 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Elchebly M., Payette P., Michaliszyn E., Cromlish W., Collins S., Loy A. L., Normandin D., Cheng A., Himms-Hagen J., Chan C. C., Ramachandran C., Gresser M. J., Tremblay M. L., Kennedy B. P. (1999) Increased insulin sensitivity and obesity resistance in mice lacking the protein tyrosine phosphatase-1B gene. Science 283, 1544–1548 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Klaman L. D., Boss O., Peroni O. D., Kim J. K., Martino J. L., Zabolotny J. M., Moghal N., Lubkin M., Kim Y. B., Sharpe A. H., Stricker-Krongrad A., Shulman G. I., Neel B. G., Kahn B. B. (2000) Increased energy expenditure, decreased adiposity, and tissue-specific insulin sensitivity in protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1B-deficient mice. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 5479–5489 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. You-Ten K. E., Muise E. S., Itié A., Michaliszyn E., Wagner J., Jothy S., Lapp W. S., Tremblay M. L. (1997) Impaired bone marrow microenvironment and immune function in T cell protein tyrosine phosphatase-deficient mice. J. Exp. Med. 186, 683–693 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Hao L., Tiganis T., Tonks N. K., Charbonneau H. (1997) The noncatalytic C-terminal segment of the T cell protein tyrosine phosphatase regulates activity via an intramolecular mechanism. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 29322–29329 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Kobori M., Yang Z., Gong D., Heissmeyer V., Zhu H., Jung Y. K., Gakidis M. A., Rao A., Sekine T., Ikegami F., Yuan C., Yuan J. (2004) Wedelolactone suppresses LPS-induced caspase-11 expression by directly inhibiting the IKK complex. Cell Death Differ. 11, 123–130 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Pôças E. S., Lopes D. V., da Silva A. J., Pimenta P. H., Leitão F. B., Netto C. D., Buarque C. D., Brito F. V., Costa P. R., Noël F. (2006) Structure-activity relationship of wedelolactone analogues. Structural requirements for inhibition of Na+, K+-ATPase and binding to the central benzodiazepine receptor. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 14, 7962–7966 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Diogo L. C., Fernandes R. S., Marcussi S., Menaldo D. L., Roberto P. G., Matrangulo P. V., Pereira P. S., Franca S. C., Giuliatti S., Soares A. M., Lourenco M. V. (2009) Inhibition of snake venoms and phospholipases A2 by extracts from native and genetically modified Eclipta alba: isolation of active coumestans. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 104, 293–299 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Kaushik-Basu N., Bopda-Waffo A., Talele T. T., Basu A., Costa P. R., da Silva A. J., Sarafianos S. G., Noël F. (2008) Identification and characterization of coumestans as novel HCV NS5B polymerase inhibitors. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, 1482–1496 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Upadhyay K., Gupta N. K., Dixit V. K. (2012) Development and characterization of phyto-vesicles of wedelolactone for hepatoprotective activity. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 38, 1152–1158 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Idris A. I., Libouban H., Nyangoga H., Landao-Bassonga E., Chappard D., Ralston S. H. (2009) Pharmacologic inhibitors of IκB kinase suppress growth and migration of mammary carcinosarcoma cells in vitro and prevent osteolytic bone metastasis in vivo. Mol. Cancer Ther. 8, 2339–2347 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Vender J. R., Laird M. D., Dhandapani K. M. (2008) Inhibition of NFκB reduces cellular viability in GH3 pituitary adenoma cells. Neurosurgery 62, 1122–1127; discussion 1027–1128 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Tsai C. H., Lin F. M., Yang Y. C., Lee M. T., Cha T. L., Wu G. J., Hsieh S. C., Hsiao P. W. (2009) Herbal extract of Wedelia chinensis attenuates androgen receptor activity and orthotopic growth of prostate cancer in nude mice. Clin. Cancer Res. 15, 5435–5444 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Lin F. M., Chen L. R., Lin E. H., Ke F. C., Chen H. Y., Tsai M. J., Hsiao P. W. (2007) Compounds from Wedelia chinensis synergistically suppress androgen activity and growth in prostate cancer cells. Carcinogenesis 28, 2521–2529 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Benes P., Knopfova L., Trcka F., Nemajerova A., Pinheiro D., Soucek K., Fojta M., Smarda J. (2011) Inhibition of topoisomerase IIα: novel function of wedelolactone. Cancer Lett. 303, 29–38 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Haspel R. L., Salditt-Georgieff M., Darnell J. E., Jr. (1996) The rapid inactivation of nuclear tyrosine phosphorylated Stat1 depends upon a protein tyrosine phosphatase. EMBO J. 15, 6262–6268 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Chen Z., Ma X., Zhang H., Sun X., Shen S., Li Y., Gu Y., Wang Y., Yan S., Yu Q. (2011) Negative regulation of interferon-γ/STAT1 signaling through cell adhesion and cell density-dependent STAT1 dephosphorylation. Cell. Signal. 23, 1404–1412 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Ning Y., Riggins R. B., Mulla J. E., Chung H., Zwart A., Clarke R. (2010) IFNγ restores breast cancer sensitivity to fulvestrant by regulating STAT1, IFN regulatory factor 1, NF-κB, BCL2 family members, and signaling to caspase-dependent apoptosis. Mol. Cancer Ther. 9, 1274–1285 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Li Y., Tang Z. Y., Ye S. L., Liu Y. K., Chen J., Xue Q., Chen J., Gao D. M., Bao W. H. (2001) Establishment of cell clones with different metastatic potential from the metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma cell line MHCC97. World J. Gastroenterol. 7, 630–636 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Leonard W. J. (2001) Role of Jak kinases and STATs in cytokine signal transduction. Int. J. Hematol. 73, 271–277 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Wu T. R., Hong Y. K., Wang X. D., Ling M. Y., Dragoi A. M., Chung A. S., Campbell A. G., Han Z. Y., Feng G. S., Chin Y. E. (2002) SHP-2 is a dual-specificity phosphatase involved in Stat1 dephosphorylation at both tyrosine and serine residues in nuclei. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 47572–47580 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Liu D., Scafidi J., Prada A. E., Zahedi K., Davis A. E., 3rd. (2002) Nuclear phosphatases and the proteasome in suppression of STAT1 activity in hepatocytes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 299, 574–580 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Mertens C., Zhong M., Krishnaraj R., Zou W., Chen X., Darnell J. E., Jr. (2006) Dephosphorylation of phosphotyrosine on STAT1 dimers requires extensive spatial reorientation of the monomers facilitated by the N-terminal domain. Genes Dev. 20, 3372–3381 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Zhong M., Henriksen M. A., Takeuchi K., Schaefer O., Liu B., ten Hoeve J., Ren Z., Mao X., Chen X., Shuai K., Darnell J. E., Jr. (2005) Implications of an antiparallel dimeric structure of nonphosphorylated STAT1 for the activation-inactivation cycle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 3966–3971 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Mo W., Zhang L., Yang G., Zhai J., Hu Z., Chen Y., Chen X., Hui L., Huang R., Hu G. (2008) Nuclear β-arrestin1 functions as a scaffold for the dephosphorylation of STAT1 and moderates the antiviral activity of IFN-γ. Mol. Cell 31, 695–707 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Vijayakrishnan L., Venkataramanan R., Gulati P. (2011) Treating inflammation with the Janus kinase inhibitor CP-690,550. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 32, 25–34 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Pardanani A., Vannucchi A. M., Passamonti F., Cervantes F., Barbui T., Tefferi A. (2011) JAK inhibitor therapy for myelofibrosis: critical assessment of value and limitations. Leukemia 25, 218–225 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Wang Y., Ma X., Yan S., Shen S., Zhu H., Gu Y., Wang H., Qin G., Yu Q. (2009) 17-hydroxy-jolkinolide B inhibits signal transducers and activators of transcription 3 signaling by covalently cross-linking Janus kinases and induces apoptosis of human cancer cells. Cancer Res. 69, 7302–7310 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Detjen K. M., Farwig K., Welzel M., Wiedenmann B., Rosewicz S. (2001) Interferon γ inhibits growth of human pancreatic carcinoma cells via caspase-1 dependent induction of apoptosis. Gut 49, 251–262 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Gooch J. L., Herrera R. E., Yee D. (2000) The role of p21 in interferon γ-mediated growth inhibition of human breast cancer cells. Cell Growth Differ. 11, 335–342 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Ruiz-Ruiz C., Muñoz-Pinedo C., López-Rivas A. (2000) Interferon-γ treatment elevates caspase-8 expression and sensitizes human breast tumor cells to a death receptor-induced mitochondria-operated apoptotic program. Cancer Res. 60, 5673–5680 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Condos R., Raju B., Canova A., Zhao B. Y., Weiden M., Rom W. N., Pine R. (2003) Recombinant γ interferon stimulates signal transduction and gene expression in alveolar macrophages in vitro and in tuberculosis patients. Infect. Immun. 71, 2058–2064 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Horras C. J., Lamb C. L., Mitchell K. A. (2011) Regulation of hepatocyte fate by interferon-γ. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 22, 35–43 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Cannon G. W., Pincus S. H., Emkey R. D., Denes A., Cohen S. A., Wolfe F., Saway P. A., Jaffer A. M., Weaver A. L., Cogen L. (1989) Double-blind trial of recombinant γ-interferon versus placebo in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 32, 964–973 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Miller C. H., Maher S. G., Young H. A. (2009) Clinical use of interferon-γ. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1182, 69–79 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Youlyouz-Marfak I., Gachard N., Le Clorennec C., Najjar I., Baran-Marszak F., Reminieras L., May E., Bornkamm G. W., Fagard R., Feuillard J. (2008) Identification of a novel p53-dependent activation pathway of STAT1 by antitumour genotoxic agents. Cell Death Differ. 15, 376–385 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Scarzello A. J., Romero-Weaver A. L., Maher S. G., Veenstra T. D., Zhou M., Qin A., Donnelly R. P., Sheikh F., Gamero A. M. (2007) A mutation in the SH2 domain of STAT2 prolongs tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT1 and promotes type I IFN-induced apoptosis. Mol. Biol. Cell 18, 2455–2462 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Cool D. E., Tonks N. K., Charbonneau H., Walsh K. A., Fischer E. H., Krebs E. G. (1989) cDNA isolated from a human T-cell library encodes a member of the protein-tyrosine-phosphatase family. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86, 5257–5261 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Sakaguchi A. Y., Sylvia V. L., Martinez L., Smith E. A., Han E. S., Lalley P. A., Shows T. B., Choudhury G. G. (1992) Assignment of tyrosine-specific T-cell phosphatase to conserved syntenic groups on human chromosome 18 and mouse chromosome 18.Genomics 12, 151–154 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Tiganis T., Bennett A. M., Ravichandran K. S., Tonks N. K. (1998) Epidermal growth factor receptor and the adaptor protein p52Shc are specific substrates of T-cell protein tyrosine phosphatase. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 1622–1634 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Ibarra-Sánchez M. J., Wagner J., Ong M. T., Lampron C., Tremblay M. L. (2001) Murine embryonic fibroblasts lacking TC-PTP display delayed G1 phase through defective NF-κB activation. Oncogene 20, 4728–4739 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Blaskovich M. A. (2009) Drug discovery and protein tyrosine phosphatases. Curr. Med. Chem. 16, 2095–2176 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Romsicki Y., Kennedy B. P., Asante-Appiah E. (2003) Purification and characterization of T cell protein tyrosine phosphatase reveals significant functional homology to protein tyrosine phosphatase-1B. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 414, 40–50 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Mattila E., Auvinen K., Salmi M., Ivaska J. (2008) The protein tyrosine phosphatase TCPTP controls VEGFR2 signalling. J. Cell Sci. 121, 3570–3580 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Mattila E., Pellinen T., Nevo J., Vuoriluoto K., Arjonen A., Ivaska J. (2005) Negative regulation of EGFR signalling through integrin-α1β1-mediated activation of protein tyrosine phosphatase TCPTP. Nat. Cell Biol. 7, 78–85 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Biological Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

RESOURCES