Abstract
The construction of a 96-member library of triazolated 1,2,5-thiadiazepane 1,1-dioxides was performed on a Chemspeed Accelerator (SLT-100) automated parallel synthesis platform, culminating in the successful preparation of 94 out of 96 possible products. The key step, a one-pot, sequential elimination, double-aza-Michael reaction, and [3+2] Huisgen cycloaddition pathway has been automated and utilized in the production of two sets of triazolated sultam products.
Introduction
Automated synthesis, in which robots and machines carry out much of the bench work, including setting up reactions, work-up, purification and analysis, has emerged as the consequence of the growing demand of hit discovery for the development of therapeutic agents.1,2 Historically, automated synthesis has found heavy use in the area of peptide synthesis,3 polymer synthesis,4 and carbohydrate synthesis.5 Takahashi and coworkers utilized an automated synthesizer in a 36-step formal total synthesis of Taxol.6 The examples of automated synthesis of complex natural products are further enriched by the synthesis of synthesis grossamide7 and oxomaritidine8 from Ley and co-workers as well 9-membered masked enediynes9 and spiruchostatin B10 from the Takahashi group.
Previously, we employed an inter/intramolecular double aza-Michael pathway as the cyclization step using tertiary sulfonamides containing TBS-protected serinol methyl ester moiety (Scheme 1).11 Automation and scale out of the inter-/intramolecular double aza-Michael addition using a microwave-assisted, continuous flow organic synthesis platform (MACOS) further optimized this “Click, Click, Cy-Click” process. As an alternative approach, and as part of a larger program aimed at the facile production of sulfur-12,13 and phosphorus-containing heterocyclic libraries for early phase drug discovery, we herein report the synthesis of a 96-member library of triazolated 1,2,5-thiadiazepane 1,1-dioxides using a Chemspeed Accelerator (SLT-100) automated parallel synthesis platform for facile production of the titled compounds.
Scheme 1.

Previously reported “Click, Click, Cy-Click” process.
Results and Discussion
Chemical Method
The vinylsulfonamide linchpin 3 was prepared via sulfonylation of TBS-protected serinol methyl ester (1), followed by sulfonamide alkylation. This scaffold was prepared on 5-gram scale with a yield of 56% over three steps. A sequential one-pot elimination, double aza-Michael addition of eight amines 4{1-8}, and subsequent [3+2] Huisgen cycloaddition with six azides 5{1-6} generated the 48-member library of 6{1-8, 1-6} (Part A, Scheme 2). Likewise, vinylsulfonamide linchpins 7{1-6} were prepared in good yield and on 1-gram scale. The orientation of triazole groups were “flipped” in producing another set of 48 compounds [8{1-6, 1-8}, Part B] merely by switching to propargyl amine which serves as both the double aza-Michael reaction donor and cycloaddition partner with eight azides 5{1-8},
Scheme 2.
Utilizing a one-pot, sequential elimination, double-aza-Michael reaction, and [3+2] Huisgen cycloaddition in the synthesis of triazolated 1,2,5-thiadiazepane 1,1-dioxides.
Library Design
For selecting building blocks, physico-chemical property filters were applied, guiding the elimination of undesirable building blocks that led to products with undesirable in-silico properties.14 These metric filters included standard Lipinski Rule of 5 parameters15 (molecular weight <500, ClogP <5.0, number of H-acceptors <10, and number of H-donors <5), in addition to consideration of the number of rotatable bonds (<5) and polar surface area. Absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) properties were calculated16 along with diversity analysis using standard H-aware 3D BCUT descriptors17 comparing against the MLSMR screening set (ca. 7/2010; ~330,000 unique chemical structures).
Automated Library Synthesis
The automated one-pot, sequential elimination, double aza-Michael and Huisgen cycloaddition was performed on a Chemspeed Accelerator (SLT-100) automated parallel synthesis platform. For the synthesis of 6{1-8, 1-6}, 1 mL of 0.3M stock solution of linchpin 3 in MeOH was distributed to each of 48 reactors. 1 mL of 0.06 M stock solution of DBU in MeOH was then added to each reactor, followed by the addition of 1 mL MeOH solution of 0.33 mmol amines 4{1-8}. The reaction mixture was heated at 40 °C for 4 hours, after which the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. To the crude products of 9, 2 mL of CH2Cl2 was charge into each reaction vessel, followed by 0.6 mmol of azide 5{1-6} in 1 mL CH2Cl2. Solid CuI (0.06 mmol) was dispensed into reaction vessels and the reactions were stirred overnight at room temperature. The mixtures were then allowed to pass through SPE, flushed with EtOAc, and the crude products of 6 were collected in bar-coded, pre-weighted vials. Compounds 8{1-6, 1-8} were prepared in a similar process, in which six stock solutions of linchpin 7 was used as Michael acceptor, and propargyl amine for the double-aza-Michael donor (Scheme 3).
Scheme 3.
The automation of a one-pot, sequential elimination, double aza-Michael and Huisgen cycloaddition step.
Result Analysis
The crude products collected in bar-coded, pre-weighted vials were concentrated in reduced pressure and subjected to preparative/mass-directed HPLC purification. The key to successful library production was to obtain compounds in >90% purity in 40–50 mg quantities, which would be sufficient for HTS screening via the Molecular Library Probe Center Network (MLPCN) (20 mg), external biological outreach screening partners (20 mg), and to retain a sample (10 mg) for follow-up evaluation or to resupply the MLPCN. Final assessment of part A and B demonstrated that these primary objectives set out in the library design were achieved; final average mass was obtained as 58 mg with average purity as 94%, and the average yield was 40% (Chart 1). A total of 94 products from the proposed 96-membered library met the requirements and have been submitted to MLPCN and other screening partners.
Chart 1.
Library: Final Mass, Purity, and Yield.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the automated production of a library of 94/96-member triazolated 1,2,5-thiadiazepane 1,1-dioxides has been successfully completed. All the procedures of liquid and solid transferring, reaction stirring and heating, solvent evaporation, and solid phase extraction (SPE) were automatically carried with “no human intervention”, except for software setup and stock solution preparation. The products have been submitted for evaluation of their biological activity in high-throughput screening assays at the NIH MLPCN and the results will be reported in due course.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgment
Financial support of this work was provided by the Institute of General Medical Sciences (P50-GM069663 and P41-GM076302), NIH K-INBRE funds (D.B., P20 RR016475), and the University of Kansas for an Undergraduate Research Award (D.B.). All are gratefully acknowledged.
Footnotes
Supporting Information Available. Experimental procedures, tabulated results and data for this library, as well as full characterization for representative compounds is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
References Cited
- [1] (a).Kündig P. The Future of Organic Synthesis. Science. 2006;314:430–431. doi: 10.1126/science.1134084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Brändli C, Maiwald P, Schröer J. Automated Equipment for High-Throughput Experimentation. Chimia. 2003;57:284289. [Google Scholar]; (c) Koppitz M, Eis K. Automated Medicinal Chemistry. Drug Discovery Today. 2006;11:561–568. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2006.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2] (a).For some recent reports, see: Fenster E, Long T, Zang Q, Hill D, Neunswander B, Lushington G, Zhao A, Santini C, Hanson PR. Automated Synthesis of a 184-Member Library of Thiadiazepan-1,1-dioxide-4-ones. ACS Comb. Sci. 2011;13:244–250. doi: 10.1021/co100060x. Carpintero M, Cifuentes M, Ferritto R, Haro R, Toledo MA. Automated Liquid-Liquid Extraction Workstation for Library Synthesis and Its Use in the Parallel and Chromatography-Free Synthesis of 2-Alkyl-3-alkyl-4(3H)-quinazolinones. J. Comb. Chem. 2007;9:818–822. doi: 10.1021/cc070051t. Vickerstaffe E, Warrington BH, Ladlow M, Ley SV. A Highly Automated, Polymer-Assisted Strategy for the Preparation of 2-Alkylthiobenzimidazoles and N,N’-Dialkylbenzimidazolin-2-ones. J. Comb. Chem. 2005;7:385–397. doi: 10.1021/cc049832+. Weber A, von Roedern E, Stilz HU. SynCar: An Approach to Automated Synthesis. J. Comb. Chem. 2005;7:178–184. doi: 10.1021/cc049838z.
- [3].Malik L, Tofteng AP, Pedersen SL, Søerensen KK, Jensen KJ. Automated ‘X-Y’ Robot for Peptide Synthesis with Microwave Heating: Application to Difficult Peptide Sequences and Protein Domains. J. Pept. Sci. 2010;16:506–512. doi: 10.1002/psc.1269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Meier MAR, Hoogenboom R, Schubert US. Combinatorial Methods, Automated Synthesis and High-Throughput Screening in Polymer Research: The Evolution Continues Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2004;25:21–33. [Google Scholar]
- [5].Seeberger PH. Automated Oligosaccharide Synthesis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008;37:19–28. doi: 10.1039/b511197h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Doi T, Fuse S, Miyamoto S, Nakai K, Sasuga D, Takahashi T. A Formal Total Synthesis of Taxol Aided by an Automated Synthesizer. Chem.-Asian J. 2006;1:370–383. doi: 10.1002/asia.200600156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Baxendale IR, Griffiths-Jones CM, Ley SV, Tranmer GK. Preparation of the Neolignan Natural Product Grossamide by a Continuous-Flow Process. Synlett. 2006:427–430. [Google Scholar]
- [8].Baxendale IR, Deeley J, Griffiths-Jones CM, Ley SV, Saaby S, Tranmer GK. A Flow Process for the Multi-step Synthesis of the Alkaloid Natural Product Oxomaritidine: A New Paradigm for Molecular Assembly. Chem. Commun. 2006:2566–2568. doi: 10.1039/b600382f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Tanaka Y, Fuse S, Tanaka H, Doi T, Takahashi T. An Efficient Synthesis of a Cyclic Ether Key Intermediate for 9-Membered Masked Enediyne Using an Automated Synthesizer. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2009;13:1111–1121. [Google Scholar]
- [10].Fuse S, Okada K, Iijima Y, Munakata A, Machida K, Takahashi T, Takagi M, Shin-ya K, Doi T. Total Synthesis of Spiruchostatin B Aided by An Automated Synthesizer. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011;9:3825–3833. doi: 10.1039/c0ob01169j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Zang Q, Javed S, Ullah F, Zhou A, Knudtson CA, Bi D, Basha FZ, Organ MG, Hanson PR. Application of a Double aza-Michael Reaction in a ‘Click, Click, Cy-Click’ Strategy: From Bench to Flow. Synthesis. 2011:2743–2750. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1260112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12] (a).Drews J. A Historical Perspective. Science. 2000;287:1960–1964. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5460.1960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Navia MA. A Chickens in Every Pot, Thanks to Sulfonamide Drugs. Science. 2000;288:2132–2133. doi: 10.1126/science.288.5474.2132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].For a comprehensive list of bioactive sultams, see Ref 11 and references cited therein.
- [14].Full in silico data and detailed calculation information is provided in the Supporting Information.
- [15].Lipinski CA, Lombardo F, Dominy BW, Feeney PJ. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 1997;23:3–25. doi: 10.1016/s0169-409x(00)00129-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Cruciani G, Meniconi M, Carosati E, Zamora I, Mannhold R. VOLSURF: A Tool for Drug ADME-Properties Prediction. In: van de Waterbeemd H, Lennernäs H, Artursson P, editors. Methods and Principles in Medicinal Chemistry. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co.; Weinheim: 2003. [Google Scholar]
- [17].Pearlman RS, Smith KM. Metric Validation and the Receptor-Relevant Subspace Concept. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999;39:28–35. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.



