Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Applied Microbiology logoLink to Applied Microbiology
. 1974 Oct;28(4):647–650. doi: 10.1128/am.28.4.647-650.1974

Modified Laminar Flow Biological Safety Cabinet

Gerard J Mcgarrity 1, Lewis L Coriell 1
PMCID: PMC365796  PMID: 4420479

Abstract

Tests are reported on a modified laminar flow biological safety cabinet in which the return air plenum that conducts air from the work area to the high efficiency particulate air filters is under negative pressure. Freon gas released inside the cabinet could not be detected outside by a freon gas detection method capable of detecting 10-6 cc/s. When T3 bacteriophage was aerosolized 5 cm outside the front opening in 11 tests, no phage could be detected inside the cabinet with the motor-filter unit in operation. An average of 2.8 × 105 plaque-forming units (PFU)/ft3 (ca. 0.028 m3) were detected with the motor-filter unit not in operation, a penetration of 0.0%. Aerosolization 5 cm inside the cabinet yielded an average of 10 PFU/ft3 outside the cabinet with the motor-filter unit in operation and an average of 4.1 × 105 PFU/ft3 with the motor-filter unit not in operation, a penetration of 0.002%. These values are the same order of effectiveness as the positive-pressure laminar flow biological safety cabinets previously tested. The advantages of the negative-pressure return plenum design include: (i) assurance that if cracks or leaks develop in the plenum it will not lead to discharge of contaminated air into the laboratory; and (ii) the price is lower due to reduced manufacturing costs.

Full text

PDF
647

Images in this article

648Image
on p.648

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barbeito M. S., Taylor L. A. Containment of microbial aerosols in a microbiological safety cabinet. Appl Microbiol. 1968 Aug;16(8):1225–1229. doi: 10.1128/am.16.8.1225-1229.1968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Coriell L. L., McGarrity G. J. Biohazard hood to prevent infection during microbiological procedures. Appl Microbiol. 1968 Dec;16(12):1895–1900. doi: 10.1128/am.16.12.1895-1900.1968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. McDade J. J., Sabel F. L., Akers R. L., Walker R. J. Microbiological studies on the performance of a laminar airflow biological cabinet. Appl Microbiol. 1968 Jul;16(7):1086–1092. doi: 10.1128/am.16.7.1086-1092.1968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. McGarrity G. J., Coriell L. L. Mass airflow cabinet for control of airborne infection of laboratory rodents. Appl Microbiol. 1973 Aug;26(2):167–172. doi: 10.1128/am.26.2.167-172.1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Staat R. H., Beakley J. W. Evaluation of laminar flow microbiological safety cabinets. Appl Microbiol. 1968 Oct;16(10):1478–1482. doi: 10.1128/am.16.10.1478-1482.1968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wedum A. G., Barkley W. E., Hellman A. Handling of infectious agents. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1972 Dec 1;161(11):1557–1567. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES