Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1971 Mar;47(3):423–430. doi: 10.1104/pp.47.3.423

Metabolic and Physical Control of Cell Elongation Rate

In Vivo Studies in Nitella1

P B Green a,2, R O Erickson a, J Buggy a
PMCID: PMC365882  PMID: 16657635

Abstract

Several levels of control of elongation rate are revealed through the detailed study of responses of the Nitella internode to abrupt shifts in turgor. The immediate response, which apparently reflects the physical state of the cell, is approximately described by the equation r = (P — Y)m where r is rate, P is pressure, Y is the wall's yielding threshold, and m is related to the wall's apparent fluidity (reciprocal viscosity). Because P and Y are in the range 5 to 6 atmospheres, and (P — Y) is roughly 0.2 atmosphere, elongation rate is initially extremely sensitive to changes in P. A small step-down in turgor (0.7 atmosphere) stops growth, and a similar rise greatly accelerates it. These initial responses are, however, soon (15 minutes) compensated by changes in Y. An apparent metabolism-dependent reaction (azide-sensitive) lowers Y; strain hardening (azide-insensitive) raises it. These two opposing processes, acting on Y, serve as a governor on (P — Y), tending to maintain it at a given value despite changes in P. This ability to compensate is itself a function of turgor. Turgor step-downs are less and less well compensated, leading to lower rate, as turgor falls from 5 atmospheres to about 2 atmospheres where growth appears not to resume. This is the lowest attainable yield value, Y1. The turgor dependency of compensation reflects a turgor requirement of the Y-lowering (“wall-softening”) process. Thus the relation between steady state, rs, and turgor is an indirect one, derived from time-dependent alterations of the cell wall. This relationship superficially resembles the instantaneously valid one in that, roughly, rs = (P — Y1)ms. Y1 and ms, however, have much lower values than Y and m. The duality of the elongation rate versus turgor relation and the prominent role of Y in regulating rate are the major features of growth control in Nitella.

Full text

PDF
423

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Effler D. B. Surgery for coronary disease. Sci Am. 1968 Oct;219(4):36–43. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican1068-36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Green P. B. Growth Physics in Nitella: a Method for Continuous in Vivo Analysis of Extensibility Based on a Micro-manometer Technique for Turgor Pressure. Plant Physiol. 1968 Aug;43(8):1169–1184. doi: 10.1104/pp.43.8.1169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lockhart J. A. Physical nature of irreversible deformation of plant cells. Plant Physiol. 1967 Nov;42(11):1545–1552. doi: 10.1104/pp.42.11.1545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ray P. M. Radioautographic study of cell wall deposition in growing plant cells. J Cell Biol. 1967 Dec;35(3):659–674. doi: 10.1083/jcb.35.3.659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Tomasz A., Albino A., Zanati E. Multiple antibiotic resistance in a bacterium with suppressed autolytic system. Nature. 1970 Jul 11;227(5254):138–140. doi: 10.1038/227138a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES