Abstract
Ginsenoside Rp1 (G-Rp1) is a saponin derivate that provides anti-metastatic activities through inhibition of the NF-κB pathway. In this study, we examined the effects of G-Rp1 on regulatory T cell (Treg) activation. After treatment of splenocytes with G-Rp1, Tregs exhibited upregulation of IL-10 expression, and along with dendritic cells (DCs), these Tregs showed increased cell number compared to other cell populations. The effect of G-Rp1 on Treg number was augmented in the presence of lipopolysaccharide (LPS), which mimics pathological changes that occur during inflammation. However, depletion of DCs prevented the increase in Treg number in the presence of G-Rp1 and/or LPS. In addition, G-Rp1 promoted the differentiation of the memory types of CD4+Foxp3+CD62Llow Tregs rather than the generation of new Tregs. In vivo experiments also demonstrated that Tregs and DCs from mice that were fed G-Rp1 for 7 d and then injected with LPS exhibited increased activation compared with those from mice that were injected with LPS alone. Expression of TGF-β and CTLA4 in Tregs was increased, and upregulation of IL-2 and CD80/ CD86 expression by DCs affected the suppressive function of Tregs through IL-2 receptors and CTLA4. These data demonstrate that G-Rp1 exerts anti-inflammatory effects by activating Tregs in vitro and in vivo.
Keywords: Panax ginseng, Regulatory T cell, Dendritic cell, Ginsenoside Rp1, Inflammation
INTRODUCTION
Panax ginseng has been used not only for medical purposes but also to boost health for a long time in Asian countries. In particular, red ginseng, which is steamed and sun-dried P. ginseng, has widely been utilized to boost the immune system. Many previous studies have indicated that red ginseng contains saponin components, such as ginsenoside Rh1 (G-Rh1), G-Rh2, G-Rg3, and G-Rg5, which all have anti-tumor activity in prostate cancer, ovarian cancer, and breast cancer [1-5]. Because these components are not stable, G-Rp1, which is a chemically stable component with ten-fold more potent anti-tumor activity than G-Rg3, has been derived from crude ginsenosides [6]. Kumar et al. [7] documented the safety and effects of G-Rp1 on anti-tumor activity and demonstrated that G-Rp1-treated mice had a significant reduction in pathological symptoms in papillomagenesis. In addition, Park et al. [8] reported that mice with orally-administered G-Rp1 displayed diminished pulmonary metastatic colony numbers in a mouse model of lung metastasis. Furthermore, G-Rp1 has been reported to inhibit pro-inflammatory cytokine production though inhibition of the nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) pathway in macrophages [9,10]. Although several reports have shown that G-Rp1 possesses anti-tumor and anti-inflammatory activities, its function in cellular levels has not yet been studied.
Foxp3-expressing regulatory T cells (Tregs) suppress the immune responses of other cells by producing the immunosuppressive cytokines IL-10 and TGF-β. The importance of Treg function has been shown in Foxp3- deficient and IL-10-deficient mice, which developed severe autoimmune diseases [11-14]. In addition, Tregs are important for the suppression of inflammation at environmental interfaces, such as the lung and colon [15]. Dendritic cells (DCs) are professional antigen-presenting cells that present antigenic peptides on major histocompatibility class II molecules to helper T cells, leading to the adaptive immune response [16,17]. Recent studies showed that DCs activate Tregs directly and control Treg homeostasis in vivo [18,19]. In particular, a reduction in the numbers of DCs led to a loss of Tregs, and the remaining Tregs downregulated Foxp3 expression [18].
In this study, we investigated the effects of G-Rp1 on lymphocyte activation and cell numbers and Treg function in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced inflammation. We found that G-Rp1 increases Treg numbers in concert with an increase in DC activation. Increased numbers of Tregs resulted from the conversion of memory type Tregs rather than the generation of new Tregs. In addition, in mice fed G-Rp1, we observed anti-inflammatory effects through DC and Treg activation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Preparation of cells
All experiments were performed in accordance with the approval of Soongsil University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Cell suspensions were made from the spleens of 6-week-old C57BL/6 mice as described previously [20]. Briefly, spleens were cut into small fragments and then cultured in serum-free RPMI1640 medium with 5 mg/mL collagenase (Roche, Mammheim, Germany) for 45 min at 37℃. Digested fragments were crushed between gauze. After depletion of red blood cells, the cell suspensions were cultured.
Chemicals
G-Rp1 was obtained from Ambo Institute (Seoul, Korea). G-Rp1; 3-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl (1→2)-β-Dglucopyranosyl dammarane-3β, 12β-diol, was prepared in a large scale from G-Rg5 Rk1 by reduction with hydrogenation [6]. Splenocytes were cultured with 5, 10, or 20 μM G-Rp1 and/or 1 μg/mL LPS (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 2 d, and/or 2 ng/mL TGF-β (PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ, USA) for 3 d.
Depletion of dendritic cells
To deplete CD11c+ DCs, splenocytes were negatively enriched by using MACS anti-mouse CD11c microbeads according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Miltenyi Biotec Ltd., Bergisch Glandbach, Germany).
Flow cytometry
Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) for CD4 (clone RM4- 5), CD11c (clone HL3), and CD45R/B220 (clone RA3- 6B2) were purchased from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA, USA), and mAbs for CD3 (clone 145-2C11), CD11c (clone N418), Foxp3 (clone 150D/E4), and IL-10 (clone JES5- 16E3) were purchased from eBioscience (San Diego, CA, USA). Biotinylated mAbs against CD80 (clone 16-10A1), CD86 (clone GL1), CD62L (MEL-14), and CD25 (clone PC61.5) were obtained from eBioscience. As the secondstep staining reagents for biotinylated Abs, streptavidinphycoerythrin was purchased from BD Biosciences.
In order to detect Foxp3 and IL-10, cells were stained with surface Abs for CD3, CD4, CD11c, B220, and CD62L followed by intracellular Abs for Foxp3 or IL- 10 using a Foxp3 staining buffer set according to the manufacturer’s instructions (eBioscience). In brief, after surface staining, Foxp3 fixation/permeabilization working solution was added to each tube and incubated for 30 min at 4℃. Subsequently, permeabilization buffer was added to each tube and centrifuged for 5 min. After that, the cells were stained for Foxp3 or IL-10.
In vivo experiment
Six-week-old C57BL/6 male mice, weighing 23±2 g were used for in vivo experiments. Seven mice of control group were injected with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and 6 mice of the second group were intraperitoneally injected with 5 ug LPS in PBS. Six mice of G-Rp1 group were orally administrated with G-Rp1 dissolved in 1% carboxymethylcellulose solution at 10 mg/kg body weight daily for 7 d before LPS injection.
Regulatory T cell purification
CD4+CD25+ cells were purified using mouse CD4+CD25+ Treg isolation kit from MiltenyiBiotec. The isolation was performed in a two-step procedure. Firstly, non-CD4+ cells were indirectly magnetically labelled with a cocktail of biotin-conjugated Abs and incubated with anti-biotin microbeads. Labelled cells were depleted using LD columns (Miltenyi Biotec Ltd., Bergisch Glandbach, Germany). For the second step, pre-enriched CD4+ T cells were labelled with CD25 microbeads and positively selected using MS columns (MiltenyiBiotec).
Quantitative polymerase chain reaction
Purified Tregs are prepared for cDNA for quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (Takara, Shiga, Japan) as described previously [21]. The relative amount for the β-actin signals was calculated as 2–ΔCt×102. The specific primer sequences were synthesized by Bioneer (Daejeon, Korea). β-actin (forward CGTGAAAAGATGACCCAGATCA) (reverse TGGTACGACCAGAGGCATACAG), IL-2 (forward TCTGCGGCATGTTCTGGATTT) (reverse ATGTGTTGTCAGAGCCCTTTAG), TGF-beta (forward CCGCAACAACGCCATCTATG) (reverse CCCGAATGTCTGACGTATTGAAG), CTLA4 (forward AGTGGGCTTCCTAGATTACCC) (reverse ATGGTGAGGTTCACTCTGCTT).
RESULTS
Effects of ginsenoside Rp1 on lymphocytes
To determine the effects of G-Rp1 on lymphocyte number and activation and the optimal concentration of this agent to use to influence cell activation, splenocytes from mouse spleens were cultured with 5, 10, or 20 μM G-Rp1 for 2 d (Fig. 1A). The relative cell numbers of helper T (Th) cells, cytotoxic T (Tc) cells, and B cells were decreased in the presence of G-Rp1. In particular, the number of Tc cells was decreased in a dose dependent manner: 17.4% with control incubation, 16.1% with 5 μM G-Rp1, 12.0% with 10 μM G-Rp1, and 6.6% with 20 μM G-Rp1. In contrast, the number of DCs was dramatically increased in a dose-dependent manner: 6.7% with control incubation, 9.8% with 5 μM G-Rp1, 15.8% with 10 μM G-Rp1, and 22.7% with 20 μM G-Rp1. The number of Tregs was slightly increased from 2.9% with control treatment to 3.9% with 20 μM G-Rp1. Because treatment with 20 μM G-Rp1 showed the biggest effect on lymphocytes without accompanying cytotoxicity, further experiments were performed with 20 μM G-Rp1.
Effects of ginsenoside-Rp1 on inflammation
To investigate the effects of G-Rp1 on inflammation, splenocytes were cultured in the presence of G-Rp1 with or without LPS (Fig. 1B). The relative cell numbers of Th and Tc cells, DCs, and Tregs cultured with LPS alone were decreased, but Th cells, DCs, and Tregs were increased in cultures with LPS and G-Rp1. In particular, the relative cell number of DCs was increased 7.5-fold from 3.3% in cells cultured with LPS alone to 24.9% in cells cultured with LPS and G-Rp1. In addition, the number of Tregs was also increased from 2.7% in cells cultured with LPS alone to 5.1% in cells cultured with LPS and G-Rp1, suggesting that DCs stimulated with LPS through Toll-like receptor 4 affect the cell number and activation of Tregs.
Role of dendritic cells in regulatory T cell activation
Because the number of Tregs was increased along with DCs, the effects of LPS-activated DCs on the cell number and activation of Tregs were examined. For this examination, DC-depleted splenocytes were cultured with G-Rp1 and/or LPS, and Treg number and activation were analyzed (Fig. 2A). The increase in Tregs cultured with G-Rp1 was abrogated in the absence of DCs. Furthermore, Tregs stimulated with G-Rp1 and LPS in the ab sence of DCs did not increase. To determine whether DCs affect IL-10 expression in Tregs, IL-10 expression was measured by flow cytometry (Fig. 2B). Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of IL-10 expression in Tregs was increased by 2.3-fold from 28.9 to 67.8 following incubation with G-Rp1, and this increase remained in the absence of DCs.
Downregulation of CD62L expression on regulatory T cells by ginsenoside Rp1
Although the number of Tregs following incubation with G-Rp1 was increased, it was not certain whether the increase in Tregs is due to induction of Foxp3 or conversion of existing Tregs into memory type Tregs. To investigate this, Tregs were cultured with TGF-β, which is required for the conversion of naive T cells into Tregs [22], and the expression of CD62L, which is highly expressed on naive cells was analyzed (Fig. 3).
Treatment with TGF-β increased CD4+Foxp3+ Tregs from 3.8% to 4.32% (Fig. 3A), and treatment with TGF-β and G-Rp1 increased the percentage of CD4+Foxp3+ Tregs to 4.48%. The Tregs induced by TGF-β and G-Rp1 downregulated CD62L expression from 4364 MFI in the absence of TGF-β and G-Rp1 to 1675 MFI in the presence of TGF-β and G-Rp1 (Fig. 3B). This result indicates that the increase in Tregs was due to the increase of Treg survival and the conversion of memory type Tregs rather than the generation of new Tregs.
Anti-inflammatory effects of ginsenoside Rp1 in vivo
To address whether G-Rp1 has an anti-inflammatory effect in vivo and whether DCs and Tregs are involved in this effect, cells from mice that had been fed G-Rp1 for 7 d and subsequently injected with LPS were compared with those from mice that had not. Firstly, DCs from mice fed G-Rp1 displayed increased expression of the co-stimulatory molecules CD80 and CD86 (Fig. 4). CD80 expression was increased by 3.89-fold compared to that in the control group and by 1.41-fold compared to that in the mice that received only LPS. CD86 expression was increased 4.63-fold and 1.37-fold compared to that in the control and LPS-injected groups, respectively.
In addition, orally-administered G-Rp1 resulted in increased IL-2 production (Fig. 5A). IL-2 was increased in this group by 6.05-fold compared with that in the control group and 1.18-fold compared with that in the LPS-injected group. IL-2Rα (CD25) expression on Tregs was not altered in any of the conditions (Fig. 5B). In all of the conditions, Tregs expressed high levels of IL-2Rα. In comparison, Tregs from mice fed G-Rp1 upregulated the expression of TGF-β and CTLA4, which binds to CD80 and CD86, suggesting that Tregs had increased immune suppression activity (Fig. 5C, D).
Activated T cells were decreased by ginsenoside Rp1 administration followed by lipopolysaccharide injection
Although LPS-injected mice showed increased numbers of all lymphocytes, including Th and Tc cells, B cells, and DCs, mice that were fed G-Rp1 exhibited a smaller increase in these cell numbers (Fig. 6). In Fig. 6, cell number of each population in the control group was set up as 100%. In particular, when the cell numbers were compared with LPS-injected mice, the numbers of Th and Tc cells induced by LPS injection following G-Rp1 administration were decreased from 125% to 112% and from 123% to 109%, respectively; however, the numbers of B cells and DCs induced by LPS injection following G-Rp1 administration were slightly decreased from 172% to 152% and from 147% to 138%, respectively.
DISCUSSION
In previous study, Kim et al reported ginseng saponin inhibits the production of proinflammatory cytokines [23]. Here, we demonstrate the anti-inflammatory effects of G-Rp1 via activation of DCs and Tregs in vitro and in vivo.
When splenocytes were cultured with G-Rp1, DCs increased remarkably, whereas other immune cell populations decreased in a dose-dependent manner. Tregs were slightly increased in the presence of G-Rp1. This effect was enhanced when the cells were stimulated with LPS, which mimics pathological changes that occur during inflammation. LPS binds to Toll-like receptor 4 on DCs and upregulates co-stimulatory molecules, such as CD80 and CD86, on DCs. CD80 and CD86 bind to either CD28 or CTLA4 with higher affinity than CD28 [24]. In the absence of G-Rp1, LPS stimulates DCs and induces strong inflammatory responses. However, in the presence of G-Rp1, LPS stimulation increased DC and Treg numbers to a greater extent, suggesting that the increase in DCs may affect Treg numbers and function in LPS-induced inflammation. This notion was confirmed as depletion of DC prevented the increase in Treg numbers. Although IL-10 expression by Tregs was not diminished in the absence of DCs, the total amount of IL-10 was decreased as Treg numbers were not increased in this situation. The increase in Tregs by activated DCs stemmed from the conversion of CD62Llow memory Tregs rather than from the generation of new Tregs.
Mice that were fed G-Rp1 exhibited greater activation of DCs and Tregs. In these mice, DCs upregulated CD80 and CD86 expression, and Tregs expressed higher levels of CTLA4 and TGF-β than cells from mice that were not fed G-Rp1. This result indicates that increased expression of CTLA4 and TGF-β by Tregs suppresses LPS-induced inflammatory responses. In agreement with this conclusion, mice that were fed G-Rp1 followed by LPS injection showed decreased immune cell numbers, especially Th and Tc cell numbers.
Because the inflammatory responses can lead to a variety of diseases, such as septic shock, autoimmunity, and cancers, control of inflammation is paramount. Here, we report that the immune suppression function by Tregs is augmented by oral administration of G-Rp1 and that this function occurs via DC activation. We therefore suggest that orally administrated G-Rp1 may help to prevent inflammatory diseases.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (NRF-2011-0024205).
References
- 1.Wang W, Zhao Y, Rayburn ER, Hill DL, Wang H, Zhang R. In vitro anti-cancer activity and structure-activity relationships of natural products isolated from fruits of Panax ginseng. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2007;59:589–601. doi: 10.1007/s00280-006-0300-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tode T, Kikuchi Y, Kita T, Hirata J, Imaizumi E, Nagata I. Inhibitory effects by oral administration of ginsenoside Rh2 on the growth of human ovarian cancer cells in nude mice. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1993;120:24–26. doi: 10.1007/BF01200720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kim HS, Lee EH, Ko SR, Choi KJ, Park JH, Im DS. Effects of ginsenosides Rg3 and Rh2 on the proliferation of prostate cancer cells. Arch Pharm Res. 2004;27:429–435. doi: 10.1007/BF02980085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Oh M, Choi YH, Choi S, Chung H, Kim K, Kim SI, Kim DK, Kim ND. Anti-proliferating effects of ginsenoside Rh2 on MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. Int J Oncol. 1999;14:869–875. doi: 10.3892/ijo.14.5.869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Shin JY, Lee JM, Shin HS, Park SY, Yang JE, Cho SK, Yi TH. Anti-cancer effect of ginsenoside F2 against glioblastoma multiforme in xenograft model in SD rats. J Ginseng Res. 2012;36:86–92. doi: 10.5142/jgr.2012.36.1.86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Park MH, Park TY. PCT/KR2005/001006. Treatment and prevention of cancer with new ginsenoside derivatives. 2005 Jul 4;
- 7.Kumar A, Kumar M, Panwar M, Samarth RM, Park TY, Park MH, Kimura H. Evaluation of chemopreventive action of ginsenoside Rp1. Biofactors. 2006;26:29–43. doi: 10.1002/biof.5520260104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Park TY, Park MH, Shin WC, Rhee MH, Seo DW, Cho JY, Kim HM. Anti-metastatic potential of ginsenoside Rp1, a novel ginsenoside derivative. Biol Pharm Bull. 2008;31:1802–1805. doi: 10.1248/bpb.31.1802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kim BH, Lee YG, Park TY, Kim HB, Rhee MH, Cho JY. Ginsenoside Rp1, a ginsenoside derivative, blocks lipopolysaccharide-induced interleukin-1beta production via suppression of the NF-kappaB pathway. Planta Med. 2009;75:321–326. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1112218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Shen T, Lee JH, Park MH, Lee YG, Rho HS, Kwak YS, Rhee MH, Park YC, Cho JY. Ginsenoside Rp1, a ginsenoside derivative, blocks promoter activation of iNOS and COX-2 genes by suppression of an IKKb-mediated NF-kB pathway in HEK293 cells. J Ginseng Res. 2011;35:200–208. doi: 10.5142/jgr.2011.35.2.200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bettelli E, Das MP, Howard ED, Weiner HL, Sobel RA, Kuchroo VK. IL-10 is critical in the regulation of autoimmune encephalomyelitis as demonstrated by studies of IL-10- and IL-4-deficient and transgenic mice. J Immunol. 1998;161:3299–3306. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bettelli E, Nicholson LB, Kuchroo VK. IL-10, a key effector regulatory cytokine in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Autoimmun. 2003;20:265–267. doi: 10.1016/s0896-8411(03)00048-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zheng Y, Rudensky AY. Foxp3 in control of the regulatory T cell lineage. Nat Immunol. 2007;8:457–462. doi: 10.1038/ni1455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Feuerer M, Hill JA, Mathis D, Benoist C. Foxp3+ regulatory T cells: differentiation, specification, subphenotypes. Nat Immunol. 2009;10:689–695. doi: 10.1038/ni.1760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rubtsov YP, Rasmussen JP, Chi EY, Fontenot J, Castelli L, Ye X, Treuting P, Siewe L, Roers A, Henderson WR Jr, et al. Regulatory T cell-derived interleukin-10 limits inflammation at environmental interfaces. Immunity. 2008;28:546–558. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.02.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Banchereau J, Steinman RM. Dendritic cells and the control of immunity. Nature. 1998;392:245–252. doi: 10.1038/32588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Cella M, Sallusto F, Lanzavecchia A. Origin, maturation and antigen presenting function of dendritic cells. Curr Opin Immunol. 1997;9:10–16. doi: 10.1016/s0952-7915(97)80153-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Darrasse-Jeze G, Deroubaix S, Mouquet H, Victora GD, Eisenreich T, Yao KH, Masilamani RF, Dustin ML, Rudensky A, Liu K, et al. Feedback control of regulatory T cell homeostasis by dendritic cells in vivo. J Exp Med. 2009;206:1853–1862. doi: 10.1084/jem.20090746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Siepmann K, Biester S, Plskova J, Muckersie E, Duncan L, Forrester JV. CD4+ CD25+ T regulatory cells induced by LPS-activated bone marrow dendritic cells suppress experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis in vivo. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007;245:221–229. doi: 10.1007/s00417-006-0356-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kim MY, Anderson G, White A, Jenkinson E, Arlt W, Martensson IL, Erlandsson L, Lane PJ. OX40 ligand and CD30 ligand are expressed on adult but not neonatal CD4+ CD3- inducer cells: evidence that IL-7 signals regulate CD30 ligand but not OX40 ligand expression. J Immunol. 2005;174:6686–6691. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.11.6686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kim S, Han S, Kim MY. Effects of interleukin-15 on human CD3- CD117+ CD56- OX40L+ cell differentiation. Hum Immunol. 2010;71:745–750. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2010.05.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kretschmer K, Apostolou I, Hawiger D, Khazaie K, Nussenzweig MC, von Boehmer H. Inducing and expanding regulatory T cell populations by foreign antigen. Nat Immunol. 2005;6:1219–1227. doi: 10.1038/ni1265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kim S, Shim S, Choi DS, Kim JH, Kwon YB, Kwon J. Modulation of LPS-stimulated astroglial activation by ginseng total saponins. J Ginseng Res. 2011;35:80–85. doi: 10.5142/jgr.2011.35.1.080. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Van der Merwe PA, Bodian DL, Daenke S, Linsley P, Davis SJ. CD80 (B7-1) binds both CD28 and CTLA- 4 with a low affinity and very fast kinetics. J Exp Med. 1997;185:393–403. doi: 10.1084/jem.185.3.393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]