Skip to main content
Stem Cells Translational Medicine logoLink to Stem Cells Translational Medicine
. 2013 Mar 13;2(4):284–296. doi: 10.5966/sctm.2012-0147

Concise Review: Adult Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Adult Neural Crest Stem Cells, and Therapy of Neurological Pathologies: A State of Play

Virginie Neirinckx a, Cécile Coste a, Bernard Rogister a,b,c, Sabine Wislet-Gendebien a,
PMCID: PMC3659839  PMID: 23486833

The ability of adult mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and neural crest stem cells (NCSCs) to integrate and differentiate into neurons once inside the central nervous system is currently questioned. For this review, exhaustive data were collected on MSC/NCSC neural differentiation in vitro. Preclinical cell therapy experiments were then analyzed in different models for neurological diseases, and it was concluded that neural differentiation is probably not the leading property of adult MSCs and NCSCs concerning neurological pathology management.

Keywords: Adult mesenchymal stem cells, Adult neural crest stem cells, Cellular therapy, Neurological disorders

Abstract

Adult stem cells are endowed with in vitro multilineage differentiation abilities and constitute an attractive autologous source of material for cell therapy in neurological disorders. With regard to lately published results, the ability of adult mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and neural crest stem cells (NCSCs) to integrate and differentiate into neurons once inside the central nervous system (CNS) is currently questioned. For this review, we collected exhaustive data on MSC/NCSC neural differentiation in vitro. We then analyzed preclinical cell therapy experiments in different models for neurological diseases and concluded that neural differentiation is probably not the leading property of adult MSCs and NCSCs concerning neurological pathology management. A fine analysis of the molecules that are secreted by MSCs and NCSCs would definitely be of significant interest regarding their important contribution to the clinical and pathological recovery after CNS lesions.

Introduction

Neurodegenerative and acute neurological pathologies represent a critical issue in clinical research, since no complete recovery of the central nervous system (CNS) functionality can be achieved in a lot of situations with current therapeutic means (despite symptomatic enhancements). In adults, whereas restricted brain areas still house cells competent to generate newborn neurons [1], this limited neurogenesis does not seem to be sufficient to enable neuronal regeneration in cases of traumatic, ischemic, or degenerative damages of the CNS. Therefore, other strategies have to be considered in order to restore the injured system, and stem cell-based replacement therapies have already been proposed and studied worldwide in a perspective of neurological disease management.

Stem cells are characterized as cells endowed with continuous self-renewal ability and pluri- or multipotentiality and could consequently give rise to a large panel of cell types [2]. Nongerminal stem cells are classified into different categories: (a) Embryonic stem (ES) cells are found in the inner cell mass of blastocyst and are pluripotent stem cells that can generate any mature cell of each of the three germ layers [3]; (b) induced pluripotent stem (iPS) are adult somatic cells that are reprogrammed into pluripotent cells with ES-like abilities [4, 5]; and (c) somatic stem cells (also named adult stem cells although already present in the embryo) are tissue-specific and more restricted than ES cells in terms of differentiation capabilities. They can be isolated from various fetal and adult tissues, which make them an attractive supply of material for cell therapy. The use of adult somatic stem cells definitely remains of significant interest regarding technical, ethical, and immunological issues concerning cell transplantation for brain diseases. In this regard, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and neural crest stem cells (NCSCs) that can be found in various locations of the adult organism (and even in perinatal tissues) represent an important source of easily accessible multipotent cells to use in a cell therapy capacity [6].

Adult Mesenchymal and Neural Crest Stem Cells

MSCs are plastic-adherent, fibroblast-like cells, which are typically able to self-renew and differentiate into tissues that arise from the mesodermic lineage, such as bone, fat, and cartilage. Whereas those cells have traditionally been isolated from bone marrow stroma (bone marrow stromal cells [BMSCs]) [7, 8], many reports have now described the presence of MSCs in a variety of fetal, perinatal, and adult tissues, including peripheral blood, umbilical cord Wharton's jelly (WJ-MSCs) and blood (UCB-MSCs), fetal liver and lungs, adipose tissue (AT-MSCs), skeletal muscles, amniotic fluid, synovium, and the circulatory system, where they work as supportive cells and maintain tissue homeostasis [9, 10]. More interestingly, it has been shown that MSCs are able to “transdifferentiate” into cells with endodermal or ectodermal characteristics and particularly into neuron-like cells [11, 12].

Despite the establishment of precise criteria that generally define MSCs [13], the major issue regarding those cells resides in the lack of exact and specific phenotypic characterization, since no specific and unique MSC marker has been reported so far. Indeed, MSCs may display different features depending on which animal species and tissue source they are isolated from, whereas differences in culture media formulations, plating density, and oxygen tension may also affect the phenotype of the mesenchymal population. Consequently, several groups described MSCs with a wide variety of different phenotypes: Verfaillie's group [14, 15] described a rare population of cells in the human bone marrow stroma as mesodermal adult progenitor cells (MAPCs), and D'Ippolito et al. [16, 17] characterized marrow isolated adult multilineage inducible cells after culturing them in low oxygen tension, whereas a lot of other groups kept the mesenchymal stem cell concept as defined by Pittenger et al. [18].

In addition to the phenotypic differences of MSCs, which are mostly inherent to experimental settings, it has been demonstrated that some adult MSC locations contained mixed populations of cells arising from different embryonic lineages. Indeed, in the past few years, multipotent and self-renewing NCSCs have been described to persist in the adult organism. Those postmigratory NCSCs were found in the sciatic nerve [19], the gut [20], the skin (skin-derived precursors [SKPs] and epidermal NCSCs [EPI-NCSCs]) [2123], the cornea [24], the heart [25], the teeth (dental pulp stem cells [DPSCs]) [26], the palate [27], the carotid body [28], the dorsal root ganglion [23], and the bone marrow [23, 29].

The properties of self-renewal and multilineage differentiation ability of all the described stem cells make them truly attractive candidates for cell therapy. Furthermore, some of them offer the big advantage of being easily obtained without invasive methods. Indeed, umbilical cord is usually discarded and could rather be preserved in order to collect UCB-MSCs and WJ-MSCs, and bone marrow aspiration (BMSCs), lipo-aspiration (AT-MSCs), skin biopsy (SKPs and EPI-NCSCs), and tooth extraction (DPSCs) are noninvasive procedures that are commonly performed in a clinical context. Those procedures could even be performed in patients when needed, allowing autologous grafts and avoiding immunological issues. Additionally, the use of MSCs/NCSCs, either from adult origin or isolated from umbilical cord, get round the ethical problems related to fetal cell use. Finally, those cells are supposed to be safer than ES cells or iPS cells in terms of tumorigenicity and genomic modifications [30].

Neural Differentiation of MSCs and NCSCs: Are Real Neurons Generated?

At the molecular level, a lot of induction protocols indicate that many signaling pathways may be involved in the neural fate of MSCs and NCSCs [3158]. Indeed, the signalization pathways involving cAMP, retinoic acid, Hedgehog, Wnt, and the neurotrophin-activated pathways have been linked with the maturation of adult MSCs/NCSCs into cells with neural features. After an induction process consisting of various activators, lengths, and conditions of culture, MSCs/NCSCs adopt a neural morphology and express markers (at the transcriptome as well as the protein level) that are usually used to characterize neurons at different developmental stages (Table 1).

Table 1.

In vitro protocols for neural differentiation of different types of MSCs/NCSCs and detailed results

graphic file with name sct00413-0140-t01.jpg

graphic file with name sct00413-0140-t01a.jpg

ns indicates that the passage or the incubation length is not specified. “No” indicates that no electrophysiological results are described in the study or that no inhibitor has been tested to confirm the pathway. The inhibitors are as follows: AG879, Trk receptor inhibitor; H89, PKA inhibitor; K252a, kinase inhibitor; KN-62, Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase inhibitor; KT5720, PKA inhibitor; LY294002; PI3K inhibitor; NSC23766, Rac1 inhibitor; PD98059, MEK inhibitor; Pep5, p75 neurotrophin receptor inhibitor; PKA inhibitor fragment 6–22 amide, PKA inhibitor; U0126, MEK inhibitor.

Abbreviations: Ach, acetylcholine; AT-MSC, adipose tissue mesenchymal stem cells; BDNF, brain-derived neurotrophic factor; bFGF, basic fibroblast growth factor; BMSCs, bone marrow stromal cells; Brn3a, brain-specific homeobox/POU domain protein 3A; CGN, cerebellar granule neurons; ChAT, choline acetyltransferase; CREB, cAMP-responsive element-binding protein; DAT, dopamine transporter; db-cAMP, dibutyryl-cAMP; DPSCs, dental pulp stem cells; EGF, epidermal growth factor; ERK, extracellular regulated kinase; FGF8, fibroblast growth factor 8; GalC, galactocerebrosidase; GAP43, growth-associated protein 43; GATA3, trans-acting T-cell-specific transcription factor; GDNF, glial cell line derived growth factor; GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein; GluR2, metabotropic glutamate receptor 2; GluR4, metabotropic glutamate receptor 4; GM-CSF, granulocyte/macrophage colony stimulating factor; Hb9, motor neuron and pancreas homeobox 1 (MNX1); HCNP, hippocampal cholinergic neurostimulating peptide; HNK1, human natural killer 1; IBMX, 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine; Irx2, Iroquois-class homeodomain protein IRX-2; MAP2, microtubule-associated protein 2; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; MBP, myelin basic protein; MEK, mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase; MIAMI, marrow isolated adult multilineage inducible; MSC, mesenchymal stem cell; NCSC, neural crest stem cell; NeuN, neuronal nuclear antigen; NF, neurofilament; NGF, nerve growth factor; Ngn1, neurogenin 1; Nkx2.2., homeobox protein Nkx-2.2; NMDAR, N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor; NSE, neuron-specific enolase; NT, neurotrophin pathway; NT-3, neurotrophin-3; Nurr1, nuclear receptor-related 1 protein; P, passage; P2X3, P2X purinoceptor 3; Pax6, paired box protein 6; PGP9.5, ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1; PKA, protein kinase A; PKAi, PKA inhibitor; PKC, protein kinase C; PSA-NCAM, polysialated neural cell adhesion molecule; RA, retinoic acid; Rac1, Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1; Raf1, RAF proto-oncogene serine/threonine-protein kinase; rDHE, rat denervated hippocampal extract; SHH, sonic hedgehog, SKP, skin-derived precursor; Sox10, SRY (sex-determining region Y)-box 10; Sox2, SRY (sex-determining region Y)-box 2; TH, tyrosine hydroxylase; TPA, 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate; TrkC, tropomyosin-related kinase receptor C; UCB-MSCs, umbilical cord blood mesenchymal stem cells; WJ-MSCs, Wharton's jelly mesenchymal stem cells.

Still, the relevance of those markers is currently matter of debate, since the expression of some neural-associated proteins is observed during mesenchymal differentiation [59] and even in different primary cultures of human bone marrow stromal cells [60, 61]. Proper neural differentiation therefore becomes ambiguous, because it is rarely expressed as a percentage of positive cells compared with basal conditions.

Additionally, despite the expression of those “specific” neural markers, only a tiny number of in vitro protocols were able to provide convincing evidence for a neuron-specific electrophysiological signature of the differentiated cells. During neural development, immature neural cells undergo a differentiation process toward functional neurons through different stages that are accurately defined by specific electrophysiological features [62]. Briefly, the first currents that occur in the cell consist of voltage-dependent outward potassium currents. As maturation proceeds, voltage-dependent inward calcium and sodium currents arise sequentially. The ultimate step is finally characterized by the elicitation of action potential through the activity of several mature voltage-gated sodium channels: an important depolarization triggers intracellular modifications, protein activation, and vesicular trafficking that are required for proper synaptic chemical and electrical function/transmission. As clearly observed in Table 1, even if a few data attest to primary electrophysiological activity in MSC/NCSC-derived neuron-like cells (as shown by sodium and potassium currents), there is not sufficient evidence for action potential firings and for an appropriate neuronal function [63].

Overall, we tend to conclude that although the cells express neural-specific proteins and exhibit a preliminary electrical activity, MSCs and NCSCs do not seem to be able to fully differentiate and generate functional neurons in vitro in a sufficient yield, in order to join the objective of cell-based therapy in human neurological treatments.

Adult MSC- and NCSC-Based Therapies in Animal Models for Neurological Diseases

Mesenchymal stem cells and their neural crest-derived neighbors are not only endowed with high multipotentiality but also present other endogenous properties that still make them interesting in cell therapy [64, 65]. First of all, they are able to strongly modulate immune responses, as first shown by improvements of graft-versus-host disease manifestations that were observed after hematopoietic cell transplantation [66] (for a more complete review, see [9]). Because they secrete a wide range of factors, MSCs/NCSCs also constitute ideal trophic support for cell survival, proliferation, and differentiation [6770]. Finally, it has been shown that they are able to stimulate or recruit endogenous cells/progenitors when transplanted into the brain [71], indicating that they can act on the host environment through indirect pathways. In the next part of this review, we will review and list most of the recent and available studies describing the effect of MSCs/NCSCs in various animal models of neurological diseases (Table 2).

Table 2.

Preclinical studies focusing on MSC/NCSC-based therapy protocols, using different experimental models for neurological disorders

graphic file with name sct00413-0140-t02.jpg

graphic file with name sct00413-0140-t02a.jpg

graphic file with name sct00413-0140-t02b.jpg

A plus sign indicates improvement. “Yes” indicates that the value has been confirmed. “No” indicates not observed, and ns indicates not specified/tested.

Abreviations: 3NP, 3-nitropropionic acid; 6-OHDA, 6-hydroxydopamine; Aβ, Aβ-amyloid peptide; AD, Alzheimer's disease; ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; AT-MSCs, adipose tissue-mesenchymal stem cells; BDNF, brain-derived neurotrophic factor; bFGF, basic fibroblast growth factor; BMSCs, bone marrow stromal cells; CNTF, ciliary neurotrophic factor; db-cAMP, dibutyryl-cyclic adenosine monophosphate; DPSCs, dental pulp stem cells; EAE, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis; EGF, epidermal growth factor; EPI-NCSCs, epidermal neural crest stem cells; FGF8, fibroblast growth factor 8; GDNF, glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor; GLP-1, glucagon-like peptide 1; HD, Huntington's disease; IBMX, 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine; ICH, intracerebral hemorrhage; MAPCs, multipotent adult progenitor cells; MCAO, middle cerebral artery occlusion; MPTP, 1-methyl-4-phenyltetrahydropyridine; MS, multiple sclerosis; MSC, mesenchymal stem cell; mSCF, murine stem cell factor; NCM, neural-conditioned medium; NCSC, neural crest stem cell; NF, neurofilament; NGF, nerve growth factor; NT-3, neurotrophin-3; PD, Parkinson's disease; PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor; QA, quinolinic acid; RA, retinoic acid; SC, spinal cord; SCI, spinal cord injury; SHH, sonic hedgehog; SKP, skin-derived precursors; SOD1, superoxide dismutase 1; TPA, 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate; UCB-MSCs, umbilical cord blood mesenchymal stem cells; VPA, valproic acid; WJ-MSCs, Wharton's jelly mesenchymal stem cells.

Alzheimer's Disease

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia; approximately 26 million people worldwide were affected in 2006 [72]. This pathology is characterized by a progressive degeneration of neurons in the frontal, temporal, and limbic lobes and is associated with the appearance of extracellular plaques (β-amyloid [Aβ] peptide deposits) and neurofibrillary tangles inside neurons (mostly composed of phosphorylated Tau proteins, which are microtubule-associated proteins). As the disease progresses, clinical symptoms include mood swings, irritability and aggressive behavior, language troubles, and memory loss. Because no efficient treatment is available so far, we could ask about the usefulness of stem cell therapy to rescue/prevent neural loss in AD patients. Whereas clinical trials are currently ongoing, several preclinical studies have been performed using AD animal models. The transplantation of UCB-MSCs induced neprilysin (an Aβ-degrading enzyme) expression in host microglia through the secretion of soluble intracellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1). This neprilysin expression stimulation is followed by a decrease in Aβ42 plaques into the hippocampus of double transgenic APP/PS1 mice (which coexpress the K670N/M671L-mutated amyloid precursor protein and L166P-mutated presenilin 1) [73].

BMSC [74] and UCB-MSC [75] injection into the hippocampus of APP/PS1 mice improved learning and memory impairments and reduced the number of Aβ aggregates through the alternative activation of host microglial cells. Furthermore, the cell transplantation was followed by a decrease of Tau phosphorylation rate. Those researchers further observed that the grafted BMSC release of CCL5 was increased into the brains of APP/PS1 mice and that alternative activation of microglia was associated with elevated CCL5 expression [76]. Moreover, they discovered that endogenous BM cells were also recruited into the brain by CCL5 and took part in inducing microglial activation.

Learning, memory, and pathology in Tg2576 mice (expressing human APP695 isoform with double mutation K670N/M671L) greatly improved after intravenous/intracerebral injection of AT-MSCs. Moreover, the number of amyloid plaques and Aβ levels decreased significantly following AT-MSC graft. This was associated with a rescue of memory impairments and neuropathology and with the up-regulation of neurotrophic factors and interleukins into the AT-MSC-injected AD brains [77].

An increased number of hippocampal neurons were observed after transplantation of nerve growth factor (NGF)-overexpressing BMSCs [78], and this was coupled with reduced latency in memory tasks. It is still not clear whether the hippocampal neurons were spared or rescued or were newly produced after the cell graft. Moreover, NGF-expressing BMSCs expressed choline acetyltransferase after being transplanted. Regrettably, the effect of NGF overexpression compared with normal BMSCs was not sufficiently pronounced or detailed in the study. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)-overexpressing BMSCs were also tested in a model of AD, whose hippocampal ultrastrucure, learning, and memory were then significantly improved [79]. Finally, BMSCs were shown to improve cognitive and memory tasks in aged rats and in ibotenic acid-treated rats, but no additional details were provided [80].

Parkinson's Disease

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder after Alzheimer's disease, with a prevalence of 0.3% of the population in industrialized countries, reaching 1% after 60 years of age [81]. This pathology is characterized by typical clinical symptoms such as bradykinesia, rigidity, gait troubles, and resting tremor. The main pathological feature is the loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta, associated with accumulation of ubiquitinated protein aggregates called Lewy bodies in different locations of the brain [82, 83]. In the early 1990s, clinical trials were started using fetal mesencephalic dopaminergic neuroblasts to transplant in PD patients [8486]. Despite the demonstration of several durable benefits in terms of clinical symptoms and pathology, a few problems remain. Fetal tissue heterogeneity, influence of harvesting methods on the graft efficiency, need of too many fetuses for only one patient, and absence of immunosuppression in an allograft procedure, all coupled with ethical concerns, left no option but finding other ways to proceed.

More recently, a clinical trial described unilateral transplantation of autologous BMSCs into the subventricular zone (SVZ) of PD patients, and reported moderate clinical improvement with no adverse effects, such as tumor formation [87, 88]. Those results were based on clinical observations and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rate Scale scores, and the mechanisms underlying the reported ameliorations are completely unknown.

Neural differentiation-based therapy protocols were performed using MSCs/NCSCs from Wharton's jelly [89], dental pulp [90], and bone marrow [9194] that underwent neural induction before being transplanted into 6-hydroxydopamine-treated rats. Behavioral and pathological enhancements were observed in most of the studies, but except for the rare expression of some neural markers (that were already observed in few cells in vitro), the underlying mechanisms were not sufficiently detailed. Conversely, significant improvements were observed in PD animal models that were transplanted with BMSCs without any pretreatment. Whereas no sign of differentiation was observed, beneficial effects and rescue of dopaminergic neurons were mainly associated with trophic support (i.e., glial cell line neurotrophic factor [GDNF] or epidermal growth factor [EGF] secretion) [95, 96] or anti-inflammation (attenuation of blood-brain barrier damage or microglia inactivation) [97]. Moreover, BMSC graft induced proliferation and migration of endogenous SVZ neuroblasts models of PD [96, 98].

Huntington's Disease Models

Huntington's disease (HD) is caused by an autosomal dominant mutation in either of an individual's two copies of a gene called Huntingtin (Htt) (expansion of polyglutamine encoded by CAG repeats in exon 1 of the IT15 gene). This neurodegenerative disorder typically becomes noticeable at midlife, affects muscle coordination, and leads to cognitive decline and psychiatric problems [99]. Although the exact mechanism underlying HD progression remains uncertain, its hallmarks are an important atrophy of the striatum and cortex and a decrease in the number of striatal GABAergic neurons [100]. So far, only fetal neural cells allografts have been performed with HD patients, whose cognitive and motor functions were moderately improved [101, 102]. Lately, a group studied the impact of BMSC transplantation in two different models of HD, the quinolinic acid (QA)-lesioned mouse and a genetically modified R6/2-J2 mouse (exon 1 from Htt and 144 CAG repeats) [103]. All of the transplanted mice survived longer than controls, and despite a slight expression of neural markers by few cells, the environmental improvement and the rescue of neurons and locomotor activity was mainly associated with neurotrophic support. Indeed, grafted cells increased the expression of stromal-derived factor-1 (SDF-1) and von Willebrand factor in the lesioned tissue, whereas they decreased the expression of Bax and caspase-3, suggesting proangiogenic and antiapoptotic events. Additionally, transplanted BMSCs induced neuroblast migration (doublecortin positive cells) into the lesioned striatum. The same observations were carried out with another genetic model for HD, the N171-82Q mouse [104]. After BMSC graft, the reduction of striatal atrophy was coupled with fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF2 or bFGF), ciliary neurotrophic factor, NGF, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) secretion, and recruitment of endogenous neural cells was observed too. According to Rossignol et al. [105], BDNF secretion was detected in the brains of BMSC-transplanted 3-nitropropionic acid-injected rats, coupled with behavioral sparing and reduction in ventricle enlargement, whereas no sign of neural differentiation was observed. Functional benefits were also observed after transplantation of BDNF/NGF-secreting BMSCs in YAC128 mice [106]. The importance of trophic support for HD management is reinforced by another study that describes a significant improvement in QA toxicity after transplantation of neurotrophic factor-secreting BMSCs [107]. More importantly, they showed that BMSCs derived from HD patients can also be induced to secrete neurotrophic factors and exert efficacious effects similarly to cells derived from healthy donors.

Spinal Cord Injuries

Whereas peripheral nerves are able to regenerate after lesion, the motoneurons and nervous fibers in the spinal cord cannot be replaced in case of spinal cord contusion, section, or compression. Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) results in a wide panel of physiopathological events counteracting any possibility of neural regeneration, and those events are generally grouped in two phases. The primary injury phase is characterized by section of axons, necrosis, degeneration, oligodendrocyte apoptosis, gliosis, and macrophage infiltration. Altogether, those events lead to secondary lesions like ischemia, inflammation, alteration of ionic balance, insults of the blood-brain-barrier, lipid peroxidation, and glutamate-induced excitotoxicity. Despite a slight spontaneous recovery, all those events collectively constitute an environment that hampers axonal regeneration [108]. Because the clinical consequences of such lesions are dramatic and rarely reversible (paraplegy, hemiplegy, tetraplegy, respiratory problems, and loss of sphincter control, all leading to important socio-economic issues), it is crucial to find efficient therapies to improve the recuperation of motor function. Recent clinical applications highlighted a tendency for BMSCs to enhance recovery after SCI [109], but this effect was not significant, and further investigation has to be performed in order to attest to a real clinical benefit.

Some studies focusing on SCI therapy are also based on the graft of predifferentiated MSCs/NCSCs. They highlighted the expression of neural markers (such as microtubule-associated protein 2, neuron-specific enolase, nestin, and βIII-tubulin) in grafted BMSCs/EPI-NCSCs and showed significant improvements in terms of cystic cavity size, neural loss [110], and motor performance [111113]. On the other hand, enhancement of functional locomotor abilities was observed [114, 115] after transplantation of unrestricted UCB-MSCs into the surrounding area of a hemisection injury, accompanied by cell accumulation near the lesion, reduction in its size, enhanced axon regrowth, and endogenous cell proliferation. In the same way, rescue of neurons coupled with pathological and behavioral improvements were observed after graft of BDNF-hypersecreting BMSCs [116] without any pretreatment and any sign of in vivo differentiation, suggesting a trophic role for grafted cells. NGF also seems to be involved in SCI motor recovery and tissue sparing, as shown [117]. Moreover, they demonstrated the proangiogenic function of VEGF secretion by grafted BMSC.

Glial cell-based therapy also makes sense regarding SCI treatment. A couple of papers have compared nondifferentiated SKP/BMSCs with SKP/BMSC-derived Schwann cells (SchCs) [118, 119]. Modifications of the lesioned environment and motor improvements were much more dramatic using SKP/BMSC-SchCs than nondifferentiated cells. Indeed, results revealed that both cell types reduced the size of the contusion cavity, myelinated endogenous host axons, and recruited endogenous SchC. More interestingly, SKP-SchC also provided a bridge across the lesion site, increased the size of spared tissue, myelinated spared axons, reduced gliosis, and provided an environment that was highly conducive to axonal growth. Finally, SKP/BMSC-SchC provided enhanced locomotor recovery relative to native cells. In the same way, cocultivating BMSCs with SchC improved their therapeutic effects in spinal cord-injured mice [120].

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is characterized by a progressive and selective degeneration of motoneurons whose cell bodies are present in the spinal cord, in motor nuclei of cranial nerves and in motor cortex, inducing muscular atrophy with a pyramidal syndrome and leading irreversibly to death. To date, pharmalogical treatments (for example, riluzole) only moderately prolong the survival of patients. Most ALS cases are sporadic, but approximately 10% are hereditary, based among others on the transmission of mutations in the copper/zinc superoxide dismutase (SOD1) gene that induce death of motoneurons by a gain of toxicity.

Whereas trials already confirm that autologous BMSC transplantation is safe [121, 122] and seems to be applicable in a clinical context, studying SOD1 transgenic animals may provide a better understanding of pathogenic mechanisms and testing of therapies for ALS. A potent effect of trophic support, and more specifically of GDNF, on ALS lesions was recently highlighted. Therefore, GDNF-engineered BMSCs were transplanted into the tibial muscles of SOD1-G93A rats and prolonged the survival of treated animals [123, 124]. After transplantation, the number of denervated neuromuscular junctions was reduced as the number of innervated ones was increased. Grafted cells also prevented the loss of cholinergic neurons in the ventral horn of spinal cord. The anti-inflammatory properties of BMSCs seem also to be important as concerns ALS therapy. Indeed, neuroinflammation (both astrogliosis and microgliosis) was reduced after BMSC administration in SOD1-G93A mice, who exhibited better behavioral performances [125], whereas only <1% of grafted cells expressed neural markers. Likewise, BMSC administration reduced ubiquitin inclusions, astrogliosis, microgliosis, oxidative stress, and excessive release of glutamate, also resulting in better clinical features, which did not rely on a long-term integration of grafted cells or on a rescue of cholinergic neurons [126].

Glucagon-like peptide 1-modified BMSCs reduced spinal cord astrogliosis and microgliosis when injected into the cerebral ventricles of SOD1-G93A mice, then ameliorating survival and delaying deterioration onset, associated with better motor performances [127].

Because it was previously shown that BMSCs isolated from SOD1-G93A rats exhibited reduced neuroprotective abilities in vitro [128], the question of an efficient autologous cell graft in ALS patients was raised. A couple of preclinical studies have been performed using MSCs from ALS patients, in order to attest to their safety and efficacy. Whereas some studies attest to a decreased functionality and trophic support of ALS patients' BMSCs [129, 130], suggesting that allogeneic graft would be a better way, other papers focused on setting up precise conditions for using autologous BMSCs. In this context, BMSCs from early passages were suggested to be safer and more suitable for cell therapy [131]. Furthermore, 1 × 106 BMSCs (from ALS patients) was shown to be the optimal dose to administer in SOD1-G93A mice [132] in order to observe prolonged survival and improved motor performances together with a lesser extent of neural loss.

Ischemic Stroke and Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Cerebral infarct or stroke is characterized by the rapid loss of brain functions after a local stop in blood supply. This can be due to ischemia (lack of blood flow) caused by thrombotic or embolic blockage or due to intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). In this last case, the expanded lesion volume could also be responsible for a local and peripheral ischemic insult. As a result, the affected brain area has impaired function, metabolism, and connections, which results in an inability to move, to understand or formulate speech, or to see a complete visual field (regarding the localization of the lesion).

Despite the advances in clinical management, stroke continues to pose major therapeutic challenges since it remains the second most common cause of death worldwide [133], and increasing experimental data now suggest that cell transplantation could considerably enhance recovery. Indeed, intravenous administration of autologous MSCs in patients with severe stroke seems to improve pathological and functional recovery without important side effects [134136]. Another clinical study noticed that clinical improvement was associated with SDF-1 concentrations in patients' sera [137].

On the other hand, preclinical studies are required to further detail pathways that are linked to this beneficial effect of MSC. As shown by Mora-Lee et al. [138], BMSCs and MAPCs are both able to induce benefits in terms of tissue sparing after FeCl3-induced stroke, through the inactivation of microglia, reduction of glial scar formation, and initiation of angiogenesis. Additionally, increased proliferation and survival of SVZ neuroblasts were observed in those conditions. Recruitment of endogenous cells was also described [139], which was the only explanation of the improvement in Rotarod performances that was seen after AT-MSC transplantation in a model of collagenase-induced ICH. DPSCs also seem able to promote recuperation after ischemic stroke, when transplanted into the brain of rats with middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) [140]. Neurobehavioral and sensorimotor functional recovery, as well as the reduction in tissue atrophy, were rather associated with glial fate adoption than with neural differentiation of injected DPSC.

Secretion of neurotrophic molecules (like BDNFs, GDNFs, and bFGFs, among others) and antiapoptotic factors by WJ-MSCs or BMSCs was studied by different groups [141144] and demonstrated to play a key role in pathological and clinical recovery of MCAO rats and collagenase-treated rats [145]. Whereas some more papers describe significant improvements on pathological and behavioral aspects [146148], one study showed that systemically grafted BMSCs integrated peripheral organs but failed to induce any change in sparing lesioned brain tissue and environment, whereas no recruitment of endogenous cells was detected [149].

Multiple Sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a common neurological disease and a major cause of disability, particularly affecting young adults. It is characterized by patches of damage occurring throughout the brain and spinal cord with loss of myelin sheaths accompanied by loss of oligodendrocytes [150]. Although the cause of MS remains unidentified, an autoimmune reaction against oligodendrocytes and myelin is generally assumed to play a major role, and early acute MS lesions almost invariably show prominent inflammation.

Recent clinical trials showed evidence for the safety and benefit of autologous BMSCs [151] that were injected in MS patients, whose visual functions and optic nerve structure were enhanced after treatment [152, 153]. Efforts to develop cell therapy for CNS lesions in MS have long been directed toward implanting cells capable of replacing lost oligodendrocytes and regenerating myelin sheaths, yet this strategy is now more discussed. Indeed, most of the recent preclinical studies suggest that the BMSCs' most prominent properties with regard to MS are their important ability to modulate immunity and inflammation, through the regulation of T-cell activity for the most part [154156]. This immunomodulatory effect was highlighted in MS patients who received intravenous injection of BMSCs and afterward exhibited improved neurological functions [121]. It was lately shown that UCB-MSCs also present immunoregulatory properties and promote remyelination and clinical recovery when administered to mice with experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) [157]. Besides, other preclinical studies highlight the role of neuroprotective and pro-oligodendrogenic molecule secretion by grafted cells. NGF-secreting cells were detected after graft of BMSCs in EAE mice [158], and other studies showed the involvement of spinal cord endogenous progenitors in de novo oligodendrogenesis [159, 160]. Recently, hepatocyte growth factor secreted by MSCs (detected in conditioned medium) was demonstrated to be a chief actor in MS lesion recovery [161] (for more exhaustive reviews, see [162, 163]).

Conclusion

Altogether, these numerous studies highlight the strengths and weaknesses of MSCs/NCSCs as candidates for cellular therapy in neurological disorders. (a) Adult MSCs/NCSCs have a limited capacity to differentiate into fully mature neurons able to fire action potentials in culture under various conditions of stimulation, suggesting that those cells may not be good candidate for cell replacement therapy. (b) On the other hand, when transplanted in various animal models mimicking neurological diseases, adult MSCs/NCSCs improve the recovery and/or the clinical situation of these animals, but without properly integrating the CNS and differentiating into new neurons. The grafted cells are mostly acting through the secretion of various factors (more or less described) able to modulate the inflammatory reaction, the glial scar, the neuronal cell survival, and the remyelination and/or recruitment of the host glial cells and neural stem cells. A fine analysis of the secretome of MSCs/NCSCs would therefore be mandatory in order to develop protocols aiming to pharmacologically mimic the effect of grafting procedures. Altogether, it appeared that MSCs/NCSCs have a dual purpose to develop model systems in the discovery of novel single/combinatorial pharmaceutical treatments and cell therapy protocols for a range of neurological diseases.

Author Contributions

V.N.: conception and design, collection and/or assembly of data, data analysis and interpretation, manuscript writing, final approval of manuscript; C.C.: final approval of manuscript; B.R.: conception and design, financial support, final approval of manuscript; S.W.-G.: conception and design, data analysis and interpretation, manuscript writing, final approval of manuscript.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

The authors indicate no potential conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Zhao C, Deng W, Gage FH. Mechanisms and functional implications of adult neurogenesis. Cell. 2008;132:645–660. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hall PA, Watt FM. Stem cells: The generation and maintenance of cellular diversity. Development. 1989;106:619–633. doi: 10.1242/dev.106.4.619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Thomson JA, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Shapiro SS, et al. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science. 1998;282:1145–1147. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5391.1145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell. 2007;131:861–872. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Malgrange B, Borgs L, Grobarczyk B, et al. Using human pluripotent stem cells to untangle neurodegenerative disease mechanisms. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2011;68:635–649. doi: 10.1007/s00018-010-0557-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rice CM, Scolding NJ. Autologous bone marrow stem cells: Properties and advantages. J Neurol Sci. 2008;265:59–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2007.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Friedenstein AJ, Deriglasova UF, Kulagina NN, et al. Precursors for fibroblasts in different populations of hematopoietic cells as detected by the in vitro colony assay method. Exp Hematol. 1974;2:83–92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bianco P, Riminucci M, Kuznetsov S, et al. Multipotential cells in the bone marrow stroma: Regulation in the context of organ physiology. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr. 1999;9:159–173. doi: 10.1615/critreveukargeneexpr.v9.i2.30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Uccelli A, Moretta L, Pistoia V. Mesenchymal stem cells in health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8:726–736. doi: 10.1038/nri2395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Caplan AI, Correa D. The MSC: An injury drugstore. Cell Stem Cell. 2011;9:11–15. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2011.06.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sanchez-Ramos J, Song S, Cardozo-Pelaez F, et al. Adult bone marrow stromal cells differentiate into neural cells in vitro. Exp Neurol. 2000;164:247–256. doi: 10.1006/exnr.2000.7389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Woodbury D, Schwarz EJ, Prockop DJ, et al. Adult rat and human bone marrow stromal cells differentiate into neurons. J Neurosci Res. 2000;61:364–370. doi: 10.1002/1097-4547(20000815)61:4<364::AID-JNR2>3.0.CO;2-C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dominici M, Le Blanc K, Mueller I, et al. Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells: The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy. 2006;8:315–317. doi: 10.1080/14653240600855905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jiang Y, Jahagirdar BN, Reinhardt RL, et al. Pluripotency of mesenchymal stem cells derived from adult marrow. Nature. 2002;418:41–49. doi: 10.1038/nature00870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Reyes M, Lund T, Lenvik T, et al. Purification and ex vivo expansion of postnatal human marrow mesodermal progenitor cells. Blood. 2001;98:2615–2625. doi: 10.1182/blood.v98.9.2615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.D'Ippolito G, Diabira S, Howard GA, et al. Marrow-isolated adult multilineage inducible (MIAMI) cells, a unique population of postnatal young and old human cells with extensive expansion and differentiation potential. J Cell Sci. 2004;117:2971–2981. doi: 10.1242/jcs.01103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.D'Ippolito G, Howard GA, Roos BA, et al. Isolation and characterization of marrow-isolated adult multilineage inducible (MIAMI) cells. Exp Hematol. 2006;34:1608–1610. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2006.07.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, et al. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science. 1999;284:143–147. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5411.143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Morrison SJ, White PM, Zock C, et al. Prospective identification, isolation by flow cytometry, and in vivo self-renewal of multipotent mammalian neural crest stem cells. Cell. 1999;96:737–749. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80583-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kruger GM, Mosher JT, Bixby S, et al. Neural crest stem cells persist in the adult gut but undergo changes in self-renewal, neuronal subtype potential, and factor responsiveness. Neuron. 2002;35:657–669. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00827-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Toma JG, McKenzie IA, Bagli D, et al. Isolation and characterization of multipotent skin-derived precursors from human skin. Stem Cells. 2005;23:727–737. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2004-0134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hu, YF, Zhang ZJ, Sieber-Blum M. An epidermal neural crest stem cell (EPI-NCSC) molecular signature. Stem Cells. 2006;24:2692–2702. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2006-0233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nagoshi N, Shibata S, Kubota Y, et al. Ontogeny and multipotency of neural crest-derived stem cells in mouse bone marrow, dorsal root ganglia, and whisker pad. Cell Stem Cell. 2008;2:392–403. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2008.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Yoshida S, Shimmura S, Nagoshi N, et al. Isolation of multipotent neural crest-derived stem cells from the adult mouse cornea. Stem Cells. 2006;24:2714–2722. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2006-0156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tomita Y, Matsumura K, Wakamatsu Y, et al. Cardiac neural crest cells contribute to the dormant multipotent stem cell in the mammalian heart. J Cell Biol. 2005;170:1135–1146. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200504061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Arthur A, Rychkov G, Shi S, et al. Adult human dental pulp stem cells differentiate toward functionally active neurons under appropriate environmental cues. Stem Cells. 2008;26:1787–1795. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Widera D, Zander C, Heidbreder M, et al. Adult palatum as a novel source of neural crest-related stem cells. Stem Cells. 2009;27:1899–1910. doi: 10.1002/stem.104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Pardal R, Ortega-Saenz P, Duran R, et al. Glia-like stem cells sustain physiologic neurogenesis in the adult mammalian carotid body. Cell. 2007;131:364–377. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.07.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Morikawa S, Mabuchi Y, Niibe K, et al. Development of mesenchymal stem cells partially originate from the neural crest. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009;379:1114–1119. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.01.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Laurent LC, Ulitsky I, Slavin I, et al. Dynamic changes in the copy number of pluripotency and cell proliferation genes in human ESCs and iPSCs during reprogramming and time in culture. Cell Stem Cell. 2011;8:106–118. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2010.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bakhtiari M, Mansouri K, Sadeghi Y, et al. Proliferation and differentiation potential of cryopreserved human skin-derived precursors. Cell Prolif. 2012;45:148–157. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2184.2011.00803.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Delcroix GJ, Curtis KM, Schiller PC, et al. EGF and bFGF pre-treatment enhances neural specification and the response to neuronal commitment of MIAMI cells. Differentiation. 2010;80:213–227. doi: 10.1016/j.diff.2010.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Curtis KM, Gomez LA, Schiller PC. Rac1b regulates NT3-stimulated Mek-Erk signaling, directing marrow-isolated adult multilineage inducible (MIAMI) cells toward an early neuronal phenotype. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2012;49:138–148. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2011.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Jori FP, Napolitano MA, Melone MA, et al. Molecular pathways involved in neural in vitro differentiation of marrow stromal stem cells. J Cell Biochem. 2005;94:645–655. doi: 10.1002/jcb.20315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Karaöz E, Demircan PC, Saglam O, et al. Human dental pulp stem cells demonstrate better neural and epithelial stem cell properties than bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Histochem Cell Biol. 2011;136:455–473. doi: 10.1007/s00418-011-0858-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kim SS, Choi JM, Kim JW, et al. cAMP induces neuronal differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells via activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase/MAPK. Neuroreport. 2005;16:1357–1361. doi: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000175243.12966.f5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Király M, Porcsalmy B, Pataki A, et al. Simultaneous PKC and cAMP activation induces differentiation of human dental pulp stem cells into functionally active neurons. Neurochem Int. 2009;55:323–332. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2009.03.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kondo T, Johnson SA, Yoder MC, et al. Sonic hedgehog, retinoic acid synergistically promote sensory fate specification from bone marrow-derived pluripotent stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:4789–4794. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0408239102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kondo T, Matsuoka AJ, Shimomura A, et al. Wnt signaling promotes neuronal differentiation from mesenchymal stem cells through activation of Tlx3. Stem Cells. 2011;29:836–846. doi: 10.1002/stem.624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lebonvallet N, Boulais N, Le Gall C, et al. Characterization of neurons from adult human skin-derived precursors in serum-free medium: A PCR array and immunocytological analysis. Exp Dermatol. 2012;21:195–200. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2011.01422.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lepski G, Jannes CE, Maciaczyk J, et al. Limited Ca2+ and PKA-pathway dependent neurogenic differentiation of human adult mesenchymal stem cells as compared to fetal neuronal stem cells. Exp Cell Res. 2010;316:216–231. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2009.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lim JY, Park SI, Kim SM, et al. Neural differentiation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor-expressing human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells in culture via TrkB-mediated ERK and beta-catenin phosphorylation and following transplantation into the developing brain. Cell Transplant. 2011;20:1855–1866. doi: 10.3727/096368910X557236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lim JY, Park SI, Oh JH, et al. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor stimulates the neural differentiation of human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells and survival of differentiated cells through MAPK/ERK and PI3K/Akt-dependent signaling pathways. J Neurosci Res. 2008;86:2168–2178. doi: 10.1002/jnr.21669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lin X, Zhang Y, Dong J, et al. GM-CSF enhances neural differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells. Neuroreport. 2007;18:1113–1117. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282010aff. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Liqing Y, Jia G, Jiqing C, et al. Directed differentiation of motor neuron cell-like cells from human adipose-derived stem cells in vitro. Neuroreport. 2011;22:370–373. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3283469615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Qi Y, Zhang F, Song G, et al. Cholinergic neuronal differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in rhesus monkeys. Sci China Life Sci. 2010;53:573–580. doi: 10.1007/s11427-010-0009-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Rooney GE, Howard L, O'Brien T, et al. Elevation of cAMP in mesenchymal stem cells transiently upregulates neural markers rather than inducing neural differentiation. Stem Cells Dev. 2009;18:387–398. doi: 10.1089/scd.2008.0080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Scintu F, Reali C, Pillai R, et al. Differentiation of human bone marrow stem cells into cells with a neural phenotype: Diverse effects of two specific treatments. BMC Neurosci. 2006;7:14. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-7-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Tatard VM, D'Ippolito G, Diabira S, et al. Neurotrophin-directed differentiation of human adult marrow stromal cells to dopaminergic-like neurons. Bone. 2007;40:360–373. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2006.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Tio M, Tan KH, Lee W, et al. Roles of db-cAMP, IBMX and RA in aspects of neural differentiation of cord blood derived mesenchymal-like stem cells. PLoS One. 2010;5:e9398. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Trzaska KA, Kuzhikandathil EV, Rameshwar P. Specification of a dopaminergic phenotype from adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells. 2007;25:2797–2808. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Wang TT, Tio M, Lee W, et al. Neural differentiation of mesenchymal-like stem cells from cord blood is mediated by PKA. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007;357:1021–1027. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.04.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Wislet-Gendebien S, Laudet E, Neirinckx V, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells and neural crest stem cells from adult bone marrow: Characterization of their surprising similarities and differences. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2012;69:2593–2608. doi: 10.1007/s00018-012-0937-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 54.Ying C, Hu W, Cheng B, et al. Neural differentiation of rat adipose-derived stem cells in vitro. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2012;32:1255–1263. doi: 10.1007/s10571-012-9850-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Zhang L, Seitz LC, Abramczyk AM, et al. cAMP initiates early phase neuron-like morphology changes and late phase neural differentiation in mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2011;68:863–876. doi: 10.1007/s00018-010-0497-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Zhang L, Tan X, Dong C, et al. In vitro differentiation of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (hUCMSCs), derived from Wharton's jelly, into choline acetyltransferase (ChAT)-positive cells. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2012;30:471–477. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2012.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Zhang W, Zeng YS, Wang JM, et al. Neurotrophin-3 improves retinoic acid-induced neural differentiation of skin-derived precursors through a p75NTR-dependent signaling pathway. Neurosci Res. 2009;64:170–176. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2009.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Bi Y, Gong M, Zhang X, et al. Pre-activation of retinoid signaling facilitates neuronal differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Dev Growth Differ. 2010;52:419–431. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-169X.2010.01182.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Foudah D, Scuteri A, Redondo J, et al. Evaluation of neural markers expression in human mesenchymal stem cells after mesengenic differentiation. Ital J Anat Embryol. 2011;116(suppl):16. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Tondreau T, Lagneaux L, Dejeneffe M, et al. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells already express specific neural proteins before any differentiation. Differentiation. 2004;72:319–326. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-0436.2004.07207003.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Montzka K, Lassonczyk N, Tschoke B, et al. Neural differentiation potential of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells: Misleading marker gene expression. BMC Neurosci. 2009;10:16. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-10-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Carleton A, Petreanu LT, Lansford R, et al. Becoming a new neuron in the adult olfactory bulb. Nat Neurosci. 2003;6:507–518. doi: 10.1038/nn1048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Liu J, Song L, Jiang C, et al. Electrophysiological properties and synaptic function of mesenchymal stem cells during neurogenic differentiation: A mini-review. Int J Artif Organs. 2012;35:323–337. doi: 10.5301/ijao.5000085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Torrente Y, Polli E. Mesenchymal stem cell transplantation for neurodegenerative diseases. Cell Transplant. 2008;17:1103–1113. doi: 10.3727/096368908787236576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Joyce N, Annett G, Wirthlin L, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of neurodegenerative disease. Regen Med. 2010;5:933–946. doi: 10.2217/rme.10.72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Le Blanc K, Rasmusson I, Sundberg B, et al. Treatment of severe acute graft-versus-host disease with third party haploidentical mesenchymal stem cells. Lancet. 2004;363:1439–1441. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16104-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Sadan O, Shemesh N, Cohen Y, et al. Adult neurotrophic factor-secreting stem cells: A potential novel therapy for neurodegenerative diseases. Isr Med Assoc J. 2009;11:201–204. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Caplan AI, Dennis JE. Mesenchymal stem cells as trophic mediators. J Cell Biochem. 2006;98:1076–1084. doi: 10.1002/jcb.20886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Crigler L, Robey RC, Asawachaicharn A, et al. Human mesenchymal stem cell subpopulations express a variety of neuro-regulatory molecules and promote neuronal cell survival and neuritogenesis. Exp Neurol. 2006;198:54–64. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2005.10.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Uccelli A, Benvenuto F, Laroni A, et al. Neuroprotective features of mesenchymal stem cells. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2011;24:59–64. doi: 10.1016/j.beha.2011.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Kan I, Barhum Y, Melamed E, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells stimulate endogenous neurogenesis in the subventricular zone of adult mice. Stem Cell Rev. 2011;7:404–412. doi: 10.1007/s12015-010-9190-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Brookmeyer R, Johnson E, Ziegler-Graham K, et al. Forecasting the global burden of Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2007;3:186–191. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2007.04.381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Kim JY, Kim DH, Kim JH, et al. Soluble intracellular adhesion molecule-1 secreted by human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cell reduces amyloid-beta plaques. Cell Death Differ. 2012;19:680–691. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2011.140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Lee JK, Jin HK, Endo S, et al. Intracerebral transplantation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells reduces amyloid-beta deposition and rescues memory deficits in Alzheimer's disease mice by modulation of immune responses. Stem Cells. 2010;28:329–343. doi: 10.1002/stem.277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Lee HJ, Lee JK, Lee H, et al. Human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells improve neuropathology and cognitive impairment in an Alzheimer's disease mouse model through modulation of neuroinflammation. Neurobiol Aging. 2012;33:588–602. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.03.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Lee JK, Schuchman EH, Jin HK, et al. Soluble CCL5 derived from bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells and activated by amyloid beta ameliorates Alzheimer's disease in mice by recruiting bone marrow-induced microglia immune responses. Stem Cells. 2012;30:1544–1555. doi: 10.1002/stem.1125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Kim S, Chang KA, Kim J, et al. The preventive and therapeutic effects of intravenous human adipose-derived stem cells in Alzheimer's disease mice. PLoS One. 2012;7:e45757. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Li LY, Li JT, Wu QY, et al. Transplantation of NGF-gene-modified bone marrow stromal cells into a rat model of Alzheimer's disease. J Mol Neurosci. 2008;34:157–163. doi: 10.1007/s12031-007-9022-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Zhang P, Zhao G, Kang X, et al. Effects of lateral ventricular transplantation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells modified with brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene on cognition in a rat model of Alzheimer's disease. Neural Regen Res. 2012;7:245–250. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5374.2012.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Babaei P, Soltani Tehrani B, Alizadeh A. Transplanted bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells improve memory in rat models of Alzheimer's disease. Stem Cells Int. 2012;2012:369417. doi: 10.1155/2012/369417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.de Lau LM, Breteler MM. Epidemiology of Parkinson's disease. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5:525–535. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70471-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Nussbaum RL, Ellis CE. Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1356–1364. doi: 10.1056/NEJM2003ra020003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Hornykiewicz O. Biochemical aspects of Parkinson's disease. Neurology. 1998;51(suppl 2):S2–S9. doi: 10.1212/wnl.51.2_suppl_2.s2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Lindvall O, Brundin P, Widner H, et al. Grafts of fetal dopamine neurons survive and improve motor function in Parkinson's disease. Science. 1990;247:574–577. doi: 10.1126/science.2105529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Kordower JH, Freeman TB, Snow BJ, et al. Neuropathological evidence of graft survival and striatal reinnervation after the transplantation of fetal mesencephalic tissue in a patient with Parkinson's disease. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:1118–1124. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199504273321702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Kordower JH, Goetz CG, Freeman TB, et al. Dopaminergic transplants in patients with Parkinson's disease: Neuroanatomical correlates of clinical recovery. Exp Neurol. 1997;144:41–46. doi: 10.1006/exnr.1996.6386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Venkataramana NK, Kumar SK, Balaraju S, et al. Open-labeled study of unilateral autologous bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in Parkinson's disease. Transl Res. 2010;155:62–70. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2009.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Venkataramana NK, Pal R, Rao SA, et al. Bilateral transplantation of allogenic adult human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells into the subventricular zone of Parkinson's disease: A pilot clinical study. Stem Cells Int. 2012;2012:931902. doi: 10.1155/2012/931902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Fu YS, Cheng YC, Lin MY, et al. Conversion of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells in Wharton's jelly to dopaminergic neurons in vitro: Potential therapeutic application for Parkinsonism. Stem Cells. 2006;24:115–124. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Wang J, Wang X, Sun Z, et al. Stem cells from human-exfoliated deciduous teeth can differentiate into dopaminergic neuron-like cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2010;19:1375–1383. doi: 10.1089/scd.2009.0258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Khoo ML, Tao H, Meedeniya AC, et al. Transplantation of neuronal-primed human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in hemiparkinsonian rodents. PLoS One. 2011;6:e19025. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Suon S, Yang M, Iacovitti L. Adult human bone marrow stromal spheres express neuronal traits in vitro and in a rat model of Parkinson's disease. Brain Res. 2006;1106:46–51. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.05.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Levy YS, Bahat-Stroomza M, Barzilay R, et al. Regenerative effect of neural-induced human mesenchymal stromal cells in rat models of Parkinson's disease. Cytotherapy. 2008;10:340–352. doi: 10.1080/14653240802021330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Offen D, Barhum Y, Levy YS, et al. Intrastriatal transplantation of mouse bone marrow-derived stem cells improves motor behavior in a mouse model of Parkinson's disease. J Neural Transm Suppl. 2007;72:133–143. doi: 10.1007/978-3-211-73574-9_16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Blandini F, Cova L, Armentero MT, et al. Transplantation of undifferentiated human mesenchymal stem cells protects against 6-hydroxydopamine neurotoxicity in the rat. Cell Transplant. 2010;19:203–217. doi: 10.3727/096368909X479839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Park HJ, Shin JY, Lee BR, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells augment neurogenesis in the subventricular zone and enhance differentiation of neural precursor cells into dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra of a Parkinsonian model. Cell Transplant. 2012;21:1629–1640. doi: 10.3727/096368912X640556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Chao YX, He BP, Tay SS. Mesenchymal stem cell transplantation attenuates blood brain barrier damage and neuroinflammation and protects dopaminergic neurons against MPTP toxicity in the substantia nigra in a model of Parkinson's disease. J Neuroimmunol. 2009;216:39–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2009.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Cova L, Armentero MT, Zennaro E, et al. Multiple neurogenic and neurorescue effects of human mesenchymal stem cell after transplantation in an experimental model of Parkinson's disease. Brain Res. 2010;1311:12–27. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.11.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Vassos E, Panas M, Kladi A, et al. Effect of CAG repeat length on psychiatric disorders in Huntington's disease. J Psychiatr Res. 2008;42:544–549. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2007.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Landles C, Bates GP. Huntingtin and the molecular pathogenesis of Huntington's disease. Fourth in molecular medicine review series. EMBO Rep. 2004;5:958–963. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Bachoud-Lévi AC, Gaura V, Brugieres P, et al. Effect of fetal neural transplants in patients with Huntington's disease 6 years after surgery: A long-term follow-up study. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5:303–309. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70381-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Bachoud-Lévi AC, Remy P, Nguyen JP, et al. Motor and cognitive improvements in patients with Huntington's disease after neural transplantation. Lancet. 2000;356:1975–1979. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)03310-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Lin YT, Chern Y, Shen CK, et al. Human mesenchymal stem cells prolong survival and ameliorate motor deficit through trophic support in Huntington's disease mouse models. PLoS One. 2011;6:e22924. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Snyder BR, Chiu AM, Prockop DJ, et al. Human multipotent stromal cells (MSCs) increase neurogenesis and decrease atrophy of the striatum in a transgenic mouse model for Huntington's disease. PLoS One. 2010;5:e9347. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Rossignol J, Boyer C, Leveque X, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell transplantation and DMEM administration in a 3NP rat model of Huntington's disease: Morphological and behavioral outcomes. Behav Brain Res. 2011;217:369–378. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Dey ND, Bombard MC, Roland BP, et al. Genetically engineered mesenchymal stem cells reduce behavioral deficits in the YAC 128 mouse model of Huntington's disease. Behav Brain Res. 2010;214:193–200. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.05.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Sadan O, Shemesh N, Barzilay R, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells induced to secrete neurotrophic factors attenuate quinolinic acid toxicity: A potential therapy for Huntington's disease. Exp Neurol. 2012;234:417–427. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.12.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Ronaghi M, Erceg S, Moreno-Manzano V, et al. Challenges of stem cell therapy for spinal cord injury: Human embryonic stem cells, endogenous neural stem cells, or induced pluripotent stem cells? Stem Cells. 2010;28:93–99. doi: 10.1002/stem.253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Karamouzian S, Nematollahi-Mahani SN, Nakhaee N, et al. Clinical safety and primary efficacy of bone marrow mesenchymal cell transplantation in subacute spinal cord injured patients. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2012;114:935–939. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Sieber-Blum M, Schnell L, Grim M, et al. Characterization of epidermal neural crest stem cell (EPI-NCSC) grafts in the lesioned spinal cord. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2006;32:67–81. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2006.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Alexanian AR, Fehlings MG, Zhang Z, et al. Transplanted neurally modified bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells promote tissue protection and locomotor recovery in spinal cord injured rats. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011;25:873–880. doi: 10.1177/1545968311416823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Pedram MS, Dehghan MM, Soleimani M, et al. Transplantation of a combination of autologous neural differentiated and undifferentiated mesenchymal stem cells into injured spinal cord of rats. Spinal Cord. 2010;48:457–463. doi: 10.1038/sc.2009.153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Zhang W, Yan Q, Zeng YS, et al. Implantation of adult bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells transfected with the neurotrophin-3 gene and pretreated with retinoic acid in completely transected spinal cord. Brain Res. 2010;1359:256–271. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.08.072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Schira J, Gasis M, Estrada V, et al. Significant clinical, neuropathological and behavioural recovery from acute spinal cord trauma by transplantation of a well-defined somatic stem cell from human umbilical cord blood. Brain. 2012;135:431–446. doi: 10.1093/brain/awr222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Park SI, Lim JY, Jeong CH, et al. Human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cell therapy promotes functional recovery of contused rat spinal cord through enhancement of endogenous cell proliferation and oligogenesis. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2012;2012:362473. doi: 10.1155/2012/362473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Sasaki M, Radtke C, Tan AM, et al. BDNF-hypersecreting human mesenchymal stem cells promote functional recovery, axonal sprouting, and protection of corticospinal neurons after spinal cord injury. J Neurosci. 2009;29:14932–14941. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2769-09.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Quertainmont R, Cantinieaux D, Botman O, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell graft improves recovery after spinal cord injury in adult rats through neurotrophic and pro-angiogenic actions. PLoS One. 2012;7:e39500. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Biernaskie J, Sparling JS, Liu J, et al. Skin-derived precursors generate myelinating Schwann cells that promote remyelination and functional recovery after contusion spinal cord injury. J Neurosci. 2007;27:9545–9559. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1930-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Kamada T, Koda M, Dezawa M, et al. Transplantation of human bone marrow stromal cell-derived Schwann cells reduces cystic cavity and promotes functional recovery after contusion injury of adult rat spinal cord. Neuropathology. 2011;31:48–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1789.2010.01130.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Xu X, Geremia N, Bao F, et al. Schwann cell coculture improves the therapeutic effect of bone marrow stromal cells on recovery in spinal cord-injured mice. Cell Transplant. 2011;20:1065–1086. doi: 10.3727/096368910X544906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Karussis D, Karageorgiou C, Vaknin A-Dembinsky, et al. Safety and immunological effects of mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple sclerosis and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Arch Neurol. 2010;67:1187–1194. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2010.248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Mazzini L, Ferrero I, Luparello V, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A Phase I clinical trial. Exp Neurol. 2010;223:229–237. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Kaspar BK. Mesenchymal stem cells as trojan horses for GDNF delivery in ALS. Mol Ther. 2008;16:1905–1906. doi: 10.1038/mt.2008.216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Suzuki M, McHugh J, Tork C, et al. Direct muscle delivery of GDNF with human mesenchymal stem cells improves motor neuron survival and function in a rat model of familial ALS. Mol Ther. 2008;16:2002–2010. doi: 10.1038/mt.2008.197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Vercelli A, Mereuta OM, Garbossa D, et al. Human mesenchymal stem cell transplantation extends survival, improves motor performance and decreases neuroinflammation in mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurobiol Dis. 2008;31:395–405. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2008.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Uccelli A, Milanese M, Principato MC, et al. Intravenous mesenchymal stem cells improve survival and motor function in experimental amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Mol Med. 2012;18:794–804. doi: 10.2119/molmed.2011.00498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Knippenberg S, Thau N, Dengler R, et al. Intracerebroventricular injection of encapsulated human mesenchymal cells producing glucagon-like peptide 1 prolongs survival in a mouse model of ALS. PLoS One. 2012;7:e36857. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Boucherie C, Caumont AS, Maloteaux JM, et al. In vitro evidence for impaired neuroprotective capacities of adult mesenchymal stem cells derived from a rat model of familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (hSOD1(G93A)) Exp Neurol. 2008;212:557–561. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2008.04.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Koh SH, Baik W, Noh MY, et al. The functional deficiency of bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells in ALS patients is proportional to disease progression rate. Exp Neurol. 2012;233:472–480. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.11.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Cho GW, Noh MY, Kim HY, et al. Bone marrow-derived stromal cells from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients have diminished stem cell capacity. Stem Cells Dev. 2010;19:1035–1042. doi: 10.1089/scd.2009.0453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Choi MR, Kim HY, Park JY, et al. Selection of optimal passage of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells for stem cell therapy in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurosci Lett. 2010;472:94–98. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.01.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Kim H, Kim HY, Choi MR, et al. Dose-dependent efficacy of ALS-human mesenchymal stem cells transplantation into cisterna magna in SOD1–G93A ALS mice. Neurosci Lett. 2010;468:190–194. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.10.074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Donnan GA, Fisher M, Macleod M, et al. Stroke. Lancet. 2008;371:1612–1623. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60694-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Bang OY, Lee JS, Lee PH, et al. Autologous mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in stroke patients. Ann Neurol. 2005;57:874–882. doi: 10.1002/ana.20501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Bhasin A, Padma Srivastava MV, Mohanty S, et al. Stem cell therapy: A clinical trial of stroke. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.10.015. (in press) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Honmou O, Houkin K, Matsunaga T, et al. Intravenous administration of auto serum-expanded autologous mesenchymal stem cells in stroke. Brain. 2011;134:1790–1807. doi: 10.1093/brain/awr063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Lee JS, Hong JM, Moon GJ, et al. A long-term follow-up study of intravenous autologous mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in patients with ischemic stroke. Stem Cells. 2010;28:1099–1106. doi: 10.1002/stem.430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Mora-Lee S, Sirerol-Piquer MS, Gutierrez-Perez M, et al. Therapeutic effects of hMAPC and hMSC transplantation after stroke in mice. PLoS One. 2012;7:e43683. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Fatar M, Stroick M, Griebe M, et al. Lipoaspirate-derived adult mesenchymal stem cells improve functional outcome during intracerebral hemorrhage by proliferation of endogenous progenitor cells stem cells in intracerebral hemorrhages. Neurosci Lett. 2008;443:174–178. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.07.077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Leong WK, Henshall TL, Arthur A, et al. Human adult dental pulp stem cells enhance poststroke functional recovery through non-neural replacement mechanisms. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2012;1:177–187. doi: 10.5966/sctm.2011-0039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Liu N, Zhang Y, Fan L, et al. Effects of transplantation with bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells modified by Survivin on experimental stroke in rats. J Transl Med. 2011;9:105. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-9-105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Wakabayashi K, Nagai A, Sheikh AM, et al. Transplantation of human mesenchymal stem cells promotes functional improvement and increased expression of neurotrophic factors in a rat focal cerebral ischemia model. J Neurosci Res. 2010;88:1017–1025. doi: 10.1002/jnr.22279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Lin YC, Ko TL, Shih YH, et al. Human umbilical mesenchymal stem cells promote recovery after ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2011;42:2045–2053. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.603621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Kurozumi K, Nakamura K, Tamiya T, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells that produce neurotrophic factors reduce ischemic damage in the rat middle cerebral artery occlusion model. Mol Ther. 2005;11:96–104. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2004.09.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Yang C, Zhou L, Gao X, et al. Neuroprotective effects of bone marrow stem cells overexpressing glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor on rats with intracerebral hemorrhage and neurons exposed to hypoxia/reoxygenation. Neurosurgery. 2011;68:691–704. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182098a8a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Yang KL, Lee JT, Pang CY, et al. Human adipose-derived stem cells for the treatment of intracerebral hemorrhage in rats via femoral intravenous injection. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2012;17:376–392. doi: 10.2478/s11658-012-0016-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Lim JY, Jeong CH, Jun JA, et al. Therapeutic effects of human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells after intrathecal administration by lumbar puncture in a rat model of cerebral ischemia. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2011;2:38. doi: 10.1186/scrt79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Tsai LK, Wang Z, Munasinghe J, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells primed with valproate and lithium robustly migrate to infarcted regions and facilitate recovery in a stroke model. Stroke. 2011;42:2932–2939. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.612788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Steiner B, Roch M, Holtkamp N, et al. Systemically administered human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem home into peripheral organs but do not induce neuroprotective effects in the MCAo-mouse model for cerebral ischemia. Neurosci Lett. 2012;513:25–30. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.01.078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Freedman MS, Bar-Or A, Atkins HL, et al. The therapeutic potential of mesenchymal stem cell transplantation as a treatment for multiple sclerosis: Consensus report of the International MSCT Study Group. Mult Scler. 2010;16:503–510. doi: 10.1177/1352458509359727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Mallam E, Kemp K, Wilkins A, et al. Characterization of in vitro expanded bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells from patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2010;16:909–918. doi: 10.1177/1352458510371959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Connick P, Kolappan M, Crawley C, et al. Autologous mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: An open-label phase 2a proof-of-concept study. Lancet Neurol. 2012;11:150–156. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70305-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Yamout B, Hourani R, Salti H, et al. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple sclerosis: A pilot study. J Neuroimmunol. 2010;227:185–189. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2010.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Gerdoni E, Gallo B, Casazza S, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells effectively modulate pathogenic immune response in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Ann Neurol. 2007;61:219–227. doi: 10.1002/ana.21076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Kassis I, Grigoriadis N, Gowda-Kurkalli B, et al. Neuroprotection and immunomodulation with mesenchymal stem cells in chronic experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Arch Neurol. 2008;65:753–761. doi: 10.1001/archneur.65.6.753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Zhang J, Li Y, Chen J, et al. Human bone marrow stromal cell treatment improves neurological functional recovery in EAE mice. Exp Neurol. 2005;195:16–26. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2005.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Liu R, Zhang Z, Lu Z, et al. Human umbilical cord stem cells ameliorate experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by regulating immunoinflammation and remyelination. Stem Cells Dev. 2012 doi: 10.1089/scd.2012.0463. (in press) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Zhang J, Li Y, Lu M, et al. Bone marrow stromal cells reduce axonal loss in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis mice. J Neurosci Res. 2006;84:587–595. doi: 10.1002/jnr.20962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Harris VK, Yan QJ, Vyshkina T, et al. Clinical and pathological effects of intrathecal injection of mesenchymal stem cell-derived neural progenitors in an experimental model of multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. 2012;313:167–177. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2011.08.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Bai L, Lennon DP, Eaton V, et al. Human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells induce Th2-polarized immune response and promote endogenous repair in animal models of multiple sclerosis. Glia. 2009;57:1192–1203. doi: 10.1002/glia.20841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Bai L, Lennon DP, Caplan AI, et al. Hepatocyte growth factor mediates mesenchymal stem cell-induced recovery in multiple sclerosis models. Nat Neurosci. 2012;15:862–870. doi: 10.1038/nn.3109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Uccelli A, Morando S, Bonanno S, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells for multiple sclerosis: Does neural differentiation really matter? Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2011;6:69–72. doi: 10.2174/157488811794480744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Uccelli A, Laroni A, Freedman MS. Mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of multiple sclerosis and other neurological diseases. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10:649–656. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70121-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Stem Cells Translational Medicine are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES