Abstract
Achieving significant adhesion to soft tissues while minimizing tissue damage poses a considerable clinical challenge. Chemical-based adhesives require tissue-specific reactive chemistry, typically inducing a significant inflammatory response. Staples are fraught with limitations including high-localized tissue stress and increased risk of infection, and nerve and blood vessel damage. Here, inspired by the endoparasite Pomphorhynchus laevis which swells its proboscis to attach to its host’s intestinal wall, we have developed a biphasic microneedle array that mechanically interlocks with tissue through swellable microneedle tips, achieving ~ 3.5 fold increase in adhesion strength compared to staples in skin graft fixation, and removal force of ~ 4.5 N/cm2 from intestinal mucosal tissue. Comprising a poly(styrene)-block-poly(acrylic acid) swellable tip and non-swellable polystyrene core, conical microneedles penetrate tissue with minimal insertion force and depth, yet high adhesion strength in their swollen state. Uniquely, this design provides universal soft tissue adhesion with minimal damage, less traumatic removal, reduced risk of infection and delivery of bioactive therapeutics.
Introduction
Achieving significant levels of adhesion to soft tissues presents considerable challenges, especially when tissues are wet1, 2. Chemical adhesives, such as cyanoacrylate, adhere strongly to tissues by a reactive exothermic covalent cross-linking reaction. However, these adhesives often cure too fast or too slowly and release toxic degradation products such as formaldehyde, leading to an intense inflammatory response3. While clinically utilized fibrin glue can effectively bond to wet tissue without a significant inflammatory response, it exhibits low strength of adhesion due to poor cohesive properties4, and can be challenging to apply as the polymerization time is difficult to control during placement. Alternatively, biocompatible hydrogel adhesives5, 6 that covalently bond to specific tissues can achieve a significant level of adhesion yet their effectiveness depends on the presence of surface biomolecules with specific functional groups (ex, NH2, SH, or COOH). Therefore, the chemistry must be tailored for each tissue and hydrogel adhesives do not adhere strongly to tissues such as skin. Also, it is critical to note that adhesives that rely on chemical bonding can easily be fouled in the presence of blood, thus compromising their efficacy in many surgical settings. For universal use, gold standard sutures and staples based on mechanical fixation are widely used7–9, however their placement can extend operating times as the tissue often must be manipulated before each pass of a suture needle. Sutures are difficult to place in small spaces (i.e. during laparoscopic procedures)10, and do not work effectively for repair of many tissues including the dura mater7, urethral defects8, and lung tissue9. While staples are typically quicker and easier to place than sutures, they can cause significant tissue damage, scarring, and excessive depth of tissue penetration can result in nerve and blood vessel damage11. Staples also pose a higher risk of developing a wound infection compared to sutures12. There are several unmet clinical needs for adhesives to affix connective tissues including tendons and ligaments, to improve contact between tissues to reduce motion of tissue grafts, and to seal tissues for prevention of fluid (intestine) or air (lung) leaks. New adhesives are also needed to prevent formation of seromas following operations that create dead space between layers of tissue (e.g. abdominoplasty), thus avoiding the need for drains that increase the risk of infection and potential necessity for reoperation13.
A suitable platform approach to overcome the limitations of existing adhesives should ideally avoid the use of reactive chemistry, provide strong tissue adhesion in both normal and shear directions, be amenable to quick application, be simple to position over the target site, be removable (or degradable) with minimal tissue damage, provide adhesion to dynamic tissue surfaces while withstanding multiple extension/compression cycles, minimize the risk of infection, and have the capacity to deliver therapeutics. Compared to glues, sutures, and staples, tissue adhesive tapes have shown significant advantages including reduced procedure times, reduced scarring, ability to spread tissue forces over a larger surface area, and enhanced tissue-handling14–16. Additionally, adhesive tapes may be useful as an internal equivalent of a transdermal drug delivery patch to deliver drugs such as antibacterial, pro-regenerative, or anti-inflammatory agents to target tissues. While barrier membranes and hernia meshes are routinely used clinically, these typically provide minimal adhesion, and often several sutures or tacks are used for fixation. Tape adhesives with hook-like protrusions have been developed, however their adhesion to tissue is fundamentally limited to surface entanglement without penetration of the tissue17.
In seeking an optimal method of universal soft tissue adhesion with minimal tissue damage, we looked for inspiration from living organisms that have through the course of evolution adapted this function. Endoparasitic worms known as spiny-headed worms use a proboscis to penetrate through tissue. Species, such as Pomphorhynchus laevis, secure firm anchorage to the fish intestinal wall by expanding a bulb using retractor muscles at the base of the proboscis following penetration18. Using the adaptable morphology of the worm proboscis, we looked to create a structured biphasic microneedle (MN) with optimal characteristics for needle insertion and retention in tissue.
Here, we demonstrate a highly engineered MN with a shape change swellable tip that facilitates mechanical interlocking with tissue (Fig. 1a). This design minimizes the force needed for tissue penetration, as the smooth, cone-shaped needles can be inserted into tissue in a dry (stiff) state and do not include protruding barb features, associated with other proposed MN based adhesive platforms19. Significant pull-out force can be achieved through the rapid increased cross sectional area that occurs with swelling at the needle tips upon contact with water (in tissue), leading to localized tissue deformation and subsequent interlocking. Thebio-inspired MN adhesive showed high levels of adhesion with wet tissues such as skin and intestine tissue regardless of differences in surface texture. Additionally, strong fixation can be achieved in dynamic tissues during multiple cycles of movement and since increased pull-out forces are achieved via swelling within tissue, the soft MN tips (i.e. reduced modulus) enable removal without significantly damaging the tissue. Furthermore, unlike stiff MNs that may break during removal from tissue, the modulus change due to swelling prevents breakage of the swollen MNs.
Results
Bio-inspired microneedle array with an amphiphilic block copolymer design and a biphasic structure
To create a stimulus responsive MN platform with low penetration force and strong adhesion, we pursued a double-layered MN design with selective localization of swellable material in the tip region. Following preferential distal swelling, each MN had both soft (outer) and stiff (inner) regions. In addition to having a MN platform comprising both swellable and non-swellable components, we sought to control the mechanical and water permeation properties of the swellable material, while promoting significant interaction between the soft outer layer and the stiff inner layer to prevent delamination. For this purpose, we considered an amphiphilic block copolymer (BCP) design that exhibits selective responsiveness to stimuli such as the presence of aqueous or organic solvents20, 21. We envisioned that dual hydrophilic-hydrophobic properties of the outer layer would enable rapid absorption of water and promote intimate interaction with the non-swellable inner hydrophobic region. Block copolymers contain two or more chains connected by covalent bonds that offer a means of combining the desirable characteristics of different polymers into a hybrid material22. The mechanical properties and swellability of the outer region of the MNs can be controlled by manipulating the overall average molecular weight of the polymer and the weight fraction of each block20, 23. In this study, we chose a polystyrene-block-poly(acrylic acid) (PS-b-PAA) block copolymer as the swellable material and PS homopolymer as a non-swellable material. PAA is a well-known super-absorbent polymer material used in several biomaterials-based strategies and in consumer products such as diapers that possesses COOH groups that quickly become ionized in the presence of water. In contrast, PS exhibits mechanical strength and structural integrity without swelling. As predicted, high volume expansion occurred when PAA was the major block component (over 70% in weight fraction). The mechanical robustness of the block copolymer could be strengthened by increasing the weight fraction of the PS block (Supplementary Fig. S1). Interestingly, the stiffness of the block copolymer in its swollen state, with PS of 25% weight fraction, approximates that of skin or intestine tissue (Supplementary Fig. S1), which reduces the risk of underlying tissue damage without significantly compromising the interlocking mechanism. To permit rapid water penetration into the PS-b-PAA layer when the PS block preferentially assembles at the air-copolymer surface, we selected a PS block with a relatively low molecular weight (<100,000 g/mol) that minimizes interfacial surface area coverage due to short polymer chains. To achieve this, PS-b-PAA was prepared from the hydrolysis of poly(styrene-block-tert-butyl acrylate) (PS-b-PtBA) with number average molecular weights (Mn) of 26,000 gmol−1 for PS and 128,000 gmol−1 for PtBA. Complete conversion of PtBA to PAA was confirmed by NMR (Supplementary Fig. S2). For functional testing in tissue, we selected swellable tips fabricated with PS-b-PAA with Mn of 26,000 g mol−1 and 76,000 g mol−1 for PS and PAA, respectively, and a PS weight fraction of ~ 25%.
As shown in Fig. 1b, a double-layered MN array having water-swellable tips was fabricated by solvent-casting a PS-b-PAA solution in DMF on a PDMS mold with a 10x10 array of conical cavities within a 1 cm2 area. Drying of the solvent prompted the formation of a thick film at the tip region of the conical cavity via capillary forces and a thin film on the remainder of the mold. To form the MN inner core and backing layer of the film, the PS homopolymer was melted on top of the continuous PS-b-PAA layer at 180°C under vacuum. After cooling to room temperature, the double-layered conical MN array was carefully peeled from the PDMS mold.
Macroscopically, the double-layered BCP MN exhibits a ‘needle-in-needle’ structure consisting of swellable outer PS-b-PAA layer and supporting PS inner core (Fig. 1c). Microscopically, the PS-b-PAA layer self-assembles into multiple phases whose location and properties are dependent on the interaction with the mold and air surface. To examine the composition of the swellable polymer surface at the air and PS core interfaces, we performed X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) on PS-b-PAA films that were casted onto PS and PDMS substrates (Supplementary Fig. S3). Given that the theoretical C/O ratio for PAA is 1.5, the C/O ratio at the surface of the PS-b-PAA layer on PDMS (14.9) and PS (22.3) suggests that PS was the dominant interfacial block. Thus, we speculate that a loosely-packed PS film with a thickness of ~ 10 nm forms at the surface of the PDMS mold (air interface following removal from the mold) and modulates the rate of diffusion, preventing a rapid modulus drop caused by immediate water absorption, which would result in insertion failure of the BCP MN array. Furthermore, during filling of inner core by melted PS, the PS block in the PS-b-PAA layer can entangle with a PS homopolymer core and the COOH groups in the PAA chains thermally cross-link via intermolecular anhydride formation24, 25. By varying the concentration of the casting solution, the height of the PS-b-PAA layer was controlled to be either 20%, 40% or 70% of BCP MN height(Fig. 1d-f). Importantly, the PS base material completely filled the mold cavities showing good contact with the PS-b-PAA layer (Fig. 1g). Fig. 1h shows macroscale images of a double-layered BCP MN array with high pattern fidelity having a density of 10x10/cm2, and having a swellable tip height of 20%, a MN base diameter of 280 µm, and a MN height of 700 µm. An overall needle height of 700 µm was selected to ensure that the needle tip swelling would occur beneath the surface of the tissue (e.g. thickness of epidermis is less than 100 µm at typical needle insertion sites)26 and to minimize the penetration depth.
Reversible shape change of a water-responsive swellable microneedle
To visualize the real-time shape change of swellable BCP MN, we monitored the swelling behavior immediately following insertion into a transparent agarose hydrogel (Supplementary Fig. S4 for experimental set-up). Once BCP MNs were inserted into the hydrogel (tip height ~ 40% of total MN height), the volume of the PS-b-PAA tip layer rapidly increased and reached ~ 60% of the maximum swollen state within 1 min. Subsequently, swelling equilibrated to a maximum swollen state within 10 mins (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Movie 1). The kinetics of water absorption of micron-sized PS-b-PAA were much faster than those of bulk material with mm-scale thickness (Supplementary Fig. S1), which was likely the result of the high surface area per volume ratio for the MN tips and short water diffusion length. At equilibrium, the volume of PS-b-PAA MN layer had expanded to ~ 9 times its initial volume (Supplementary Fig. S5). Volume expansion of BCP MN by swelling predominantly occurred in the tip region and swollen BCP MN interlocked with the hydrogel. The interlocked BCP MN could be removed from agarose gel without breakage or delamination. The swollen tips immediately began to deswell following retrieval from the hydrogel substrate and fully recovered to their original conical structure within 15 mins (Supplementary Fig. S6 and Movie 2).
When PS or PAA homopolymers were used as the MN tip material, they produced opposing results. The non-swellable PS MN was easily inserted into the hydrogel and freely removed without significant applied force, whereas the PAA MN did not penetrate the hydrogel because of low mechanical strength (Supplementary Fig. S7). Although it is possible to make stiff PAA MN that can be inserted into hydrogel (or tissue) by cross-linking following harsh thermal treatment, pure PAA MN is also prone to delamination during removal of the MN due to poor interfacial adhesion with the backing layer.
To verify the stimulus responsive mechanical interlocking of the BCP MN in animal tissue, we utilized Optical Frequency Domain Imaging (OFDI) that is capable of providing non-invasive cross-sectional views of internal tissue structures to a depth of 1–2 mm with high resolution27. While the BCP MN inserted into muscle tissue showed less initial volume expansion rate compared to the agarose hydrogel, it reached the same final swollen state within 10 mins (Fig. 2b and Supplementary Movie 3). Interestingly, insertion into muscle tissue induced radial expansion of the BCP MN compared to axial swelling within the homogeneous agarose hydrogel. As observed within muscle tissue via OFDI, the swollen BCP MN formed a mushroom-shaped structure that provides a more favorable geometry to support mechanical interlocking with tissue.
Firm adhesion of the swellable microneedle adhesive based on mechanical interlocking with tissue
The adhesive properties of the BCP MN were evaluated by testing the normal adhesion strength of a 10 × 10 MN array (1 cm2 CSA) on fresh cadaveric porcine skin. We investigated the effect of swelling-induced MN shape change on adhesion, compared to the adhesion of non-swellable PS MN (Fig. 3a). Adhesion of flat PS-b-PAA (BCP) and PS films were also measured. Both flat-surfaced BCP and PS films showed low adhesion strength to skin (less than 0.1 N/cm2). While, BCP MN and PS MN showed similar force versus displacement profiles during skin insertion (Supplementary Fig. S8) and exhibited similar adhesion strength to skin immediately after insertion, after 10 minutes the maximum swollen state for BCP MN was achieved and the adhesive strength of the BCP MN dramatically increased. BCP MN with a swellable tip height of 20% (BCP MN (20%)) showed ~ 7 times higher adhesion strength (0.69 ± 0.17 N/cm2) than PS MN adhesive (0.098 ± 0.015 N/cm2). Furthermore, for BCP MN with a swellable tip height of 40% (BCP MN (40%)), the adhesive strength increased ~ 12 fold (1.23 ± 0.26 N/cm2). However, MN with a swellable tip height of 70% (BCP MN (70%)) exhibited reduced adhesive performance (Supplementary Fig. S9), likely due to a less favorable configuration for interlocking with tissue. No significant increase in adhesive strength was observed for the BCP MN for longer than 30 minutes swelling (Fig. 3b). For most intended uses, a short application time is desirable; therefore the swelling time was standardized at 10 minutes for all additional experiments.
The shape change adhesive mechanism of the BCP MN within porcine skin is shown in Fig. 3c. Following insertion into skin (Fig. 3c(i)), the tissue recoils and applies a mechanically compressive force against the BCP MN shaft. The position of the BCP MN is held fixed as the inserted BCP MN immediately swells in the presence of interstitial fluid and rapid volume expansion nears completion within 10 minutes, where the shape of the swollen tip stabilizes. The concentrated volume expansion at the tip of the BCP MN (Fig. 3c(ii)) leads to an arrow-head like structure facilitating mechanical interlocking with the tissue. Removal of the BCP MN from the skin can be safely performed without fracture or delamination due to the deformability of the swollen tip and strong interfacial interaction between the swollen layer and base material (Fig. 3c(iii)). Significant adhesive strength was maintained even at high levels of strain between BCP MNs and skin until BCP MNs are fully removed from the skin, indicating that the BCP MN exhibits high adhesion energy. Due to the reversible responsiveness in water (Fig. 3c(iv)), the swollen BCP MNs quickly return to their original conical structure after removal. Following recovery of shape and stiffness (Supplementary Fig. S10), the BCP MN exhibited reversible adhesive properties during multiple swelling/de-swelling cycles; therefore it is possible that the BCP MN could be reused following sterilization by ethanol or autoclave treatment.
We compared the adhesive strength of the BCP MN with currently used commercial pressure sensitive adhesive bandages on semi-dry and wet porcine skin surfaces (Supplementary Fig. S11). While commercial bandages show higher adhesive strength on dry skin surfaces compared to the BCP MN adhesive, the adhesive strength of commercial bandages on wet skin decreased by more than 50%. However, BCP MNs showed similar adhesive strength regardless of the presence of water on the tissue surface. To demonstrate the versatility of the BCP MN adhesive, the stiff PS base material was substituted for a flexible thermoplastic PS-based elastomer (Fig. 3d). The flexible BCP MN adhesive (Flex BCP MN) with 10 × 10 array in a 1 cm2 was applied to a wet skin surface on top of a pig wrist joint that was cycled through an angle of ~ 60° to stretch and compress the tissue. Flex BCP MNs maintained strong attachment without migration during 100 cycles of bending motion (Fig. 3e and Supplementary Movie 4).
Microneedle adhesive for use in skin graft fixation
With regard to potential immediate applications of BCP MN adhesives, we envision fixation of skin grafts as a strong candidate. Skin grafts are often employed for closure of open wounds as a result of burns, trauma, or surgical resections28, 29. For successful engraftment, continuous contact between the skin graft and underlying tissue is essential to assure graft survival by directed diffusion of wound bed nutrients as well as to prevent hematoma or seroma formation30. Sutures or staples applied to the perimeter of the skin graft represent the current standard of care, and frequently this results in separation between the tissue layers, as direct fixation only occurs along the periphery of the wound. Furthermore, fixation by staples is not rigid enough to avoid motion and shear resulting frequently in partial or complete loss of the graft. The likelihood of failure is diminished by secondary dressings, and grafted body part immobilization.
From dye diffusion tests, we found that staples provided a surface contact area of ~ 50% between the skin graft and underlying hydrogel and that the staples produced significant damage to the hydrogel during insertion and removal (Fig. 4a). In contrast, the BCP MN adhesive showed continuous contact of ~ 100% with minimal damage to the hydrogel (Fig. 4b). As marked by an arrow in Fig. 4a, the depth of penetration (~ 3 mm) of stapes causes significant tissue damage and results in a higher risk of bacterial infiltration. In adhesion testing, although stapled skin grafts did not fully detach from underlying tissue during pull-out, central regions of the skin grafts were separated due to low adhesion strength(Fig. 4c). Skin grafts fixed using the BCP MN adhesive on muscle tissue showed significantly higher adhesive strength (0.93 ± 0.23 N/cm2) than stapled skin grafts (0.28 ± 0.11 N/cm2) and non-fixed skin grafts (0.22 ± 0.09 N/cm2) (Table 1). The attachment was maintained following an elongation of ~ 4 mm which is more than 5 times the height of the BCP MN (Fig. 4d). To prevent accumulation of fluid at the interface between BCP MN adhesive and skin graft, drainage holes can easily be placed within the backing material of the adhesive array(Supplementary Fig. S12). An ideal tissue adhesive should also provide a biological barrier to reduce the risk of surgical site infection. In the case of staple fixation, stress concentrations localized around the staple legs can cause excessive tearing of a skin graft and produce a larger hole than a diameter of the staple (Fig. 4e). Staple holes serve as a pathway for bacterial infiltration12 and as expected, Escherichia coli (E. coli) transformed to express the green fluorescent protein (GFP),infiltrated through the staple holes and formed colonies (Fig. 4f). For the BCP MN adhesive, the interlocked and swollen MNs tightly seal the punctured holes thus preventing the physical passage of microorganisms (Fig. 4g). The BCP MN adhesive was removed without a significant damage to the agar layer (left image in Fig. 4h) and GFP signal was not detected in the agar plate placed beneath the incised skin grafts covered by the BCP MN (right image in Fig. 4h). As a result of the non-permeable backing layer and tight sealing of the punctured holes by the swollen microneedles, the BCP MN adhesive effectively prevents the infiltration of bacteria, which is a main cause of infection.
Table 1. Tissue adhesion for skin grafts fixed by BCP MN adhesive and staples.
Fixer for skin graft | Adhesion Strength (N/cm2) | Work of Adhesion (mJ/cm2) |
---|---|---|
BCP MN adhesive (10 × 10 MNs in 1 cm2) | 0.93 ± 0.23 | 5.23 ± 1.7 |
Staples | 0.28 ± 0.11 | 0.6 ± 0.13 |
Flat patch | 0.22 ± 0.09 | 0.54 ± 0.26 |
While the micron-sized puncture marks created after removal of the MNs from the wound could serve as a source of infection, it has been reported that the skin recovers its barrier function within a few hours following MN removal31. The disappearance of puncture marks was confirmed within 1hr of removal of the swellable MN adhesive (Supplementary Fig. S13). In addition, it has been reported that microbial penetration through the holes created by microneedles is minimal32. Considering its rapid and long-term adhesion, this superior bacterial barrier provided by the BCP MN adhesive could reduce the risk of infection to open wounds including burn tissue.
Firm adhesion of the microneedle adhesive to intestinal tissue
To evaluate the capacity for BCP MN adhesives to be used to seal intestine tissue which may be useful to prevent leaks following gut anastomosis procedures, we examined adhesion to the outer serosal surface (Fig. 5a) that is a relatively smooth surface (roughness of several micrometers) and inner wrinkled mucosal surface (roughness on the sub-mm scale) that is covered by a sticky mucin layer (Fig. 5b). The non-swellable PS MN adhesive applied to the outer surface of the intestine tissue (Fig. 5c) showed an adhesive strength of 0.48 ± 0.18 N/cm2, whereas a swellable MN adhesive with a PS base (BCP MN) showed an adhesive strength of 1.62 ± 0.17 N/cm2. Interestingly, the BCP MN adhesive exhibited an adhesive strength of 3.83 ± 1.35 N/cm2 to the inner mucosal surface, possibly resulting from non-covalent interactions with mucin. Moreover, the Flex BCP MN showed further improvement in adhesive strength to the mucosal surface, up to 8 N/cm2 (mean value: 4.53 N/cm2). The enhanced adhesion of the Flex BCP MN on the mucosal surface may result from increased intimate contact during removal that may be facilitated by increased absorption of energy by the flexible backing material. The BCP MN adhesive appears to achieve adhesion to tissues that cannot be achieved effectively using conventional tape-based approaches33. As shown in Fig. 5d, inserted PS MNs into the outer surface of intestine tissue showed an average maximum torque of 0.85 ± 0.28 N cm during torsion tests, through a 60° angle of rotation. After removing PS MNs from the tissue, it was observed that ~ 30 % MNs remained broken. When the PS MNs were exposed to 100° of rotation prior to removal from tissue, they showed a higher maximum torque (1.22 ± 0.41 Ncm) and nearly all tips or whole bodies were broken (Fig. 5e). Comparatively, less than 5% of the BCP MN and none of the Flex BCP MN were broken following 60° of rotation and less than 5 % of Flex BCP MN were broken following 100° of rotation (Fig. 5d, 5g). Interestingly, puncture marks resulting from the BCP MN insertion into tissue disappeared within 2 hrs of removal (Supplementary Fig. S14).
Discussion
The swellable MN adhesive presented here provides a new platform for adhesion based on mechanical interlocking. It harnesses a water based swelling mechanism that responds quickly and is reversible. While we chose PS and PAA as our materials in this proof of concept study, the strategy described herein could be applied using many other polymers. Conventional polymer based MN systems are composed of relatively stiff materials so that they can penetrate tissue without deformation. However, this can often lead to brittle fracture of MNs when they are subjected to dynamic tissues. Since our MN system is biphasic and becomes more ductile during the swelling process, we hypothesized that our system has a distinct advantage compared to other systems in this regard. As presented here, 100% of MNs remained intact regardless of the tissue type when swollen MNs with stiff or flexible cores were removed from the inserted tissues in the normal direction. In addition, the resistance of MNs to torsion-induced shear stress is compelling. Although it is difficult to quantify the exact levels of shear stress generated in this approach due to the complex interfacial geometry, at significant levels of shear strain (induced by 60° of rotation) 100% of Flex BCP MNs remain intact, while ~ 1/3 of PS MNs fracture.
Considering previous achievements with MN based drug delivery, it is expected that the MN adhesive could provide a dual function enabling a firm attachment and efficient drug permeation. This strategy would be especially useful for skin graft fixation, which requires intimate contact between the skin graft and the underlying wound bed over the entire surface area of the wound during movement, and a necessity to deliver medications such as anti-inflammatory/anti-scarring agents, antibiotics, and bioactive peptides directly to the wound bed. Since drugs can easily be loaded into the swellable tips during swelling, within an agent doped solution (followed by deswelling to return to a stiff state), BCP MN adhesive can administer multiple types of agents directly into the wound microenvironment in a minimally invasive manner. To verify the potential use of the swellable MN for delivery of drugs, we loaded BCP MN with triamcinolone acetonide (TACA), a steroid with anti-scarring and anti-inflammatory properties, by allowing them to swell in a TACA solution. The BCP MN adhesive (100 MNs in 1 cm2) showed ~ 70% release of TACA over the course of one day in DI water, with the remaining TACA released over several days. Additionally, towards potential delivery of biologics, we showed that the BCP MN swellable tips could encapsulate FITC-labeled dextran (Mw: 2,000,000 Daltons) with a hydrodynamic diameter of ~ 100 nm during the swelling process (Supplementary Fig. S15).
PS and PAA were chosen as components of our swellable MN system given their established potential to exhibit only a minimal inflammatory response upon implantation34, 35. While we envision the approach could be employed with biodegradable materials, diffusion based drug delivery through the swollen non-degradable MN is controllable and likely useful for short-term applications.
While a change in the local acidic environment during the swelling process of PS-b-PAA could stimulate an inflammatory reaction, a relatively minor change in pH (7.3 to 6.8) of PS-b-PAA is observed compared to the PAA homopolymer (7.3 to 3.4) (Supplementary Fig. S16). As highlighted by Banga et al.36, MN based systems for drug delivery are largely analogous to the use of hypodermic syringes, with specific advantages associated with minimal user training and lower or no risk of injury to the user and patient. While there are regulatory issues associated with medication linked to the delivery material, in our MN system the only material which remains in the tissue upon removal of the MN is the loaded drug; thus reducing the potential for a chronic foreign body response.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated a new bio-inspired tissue adhesive platform governed by shape change-mediated mechanically interlocking MNs. This MN exhibits universal adhesion to soft tissues regardless of surface chemistry and it mechanically interlocks with tissues without significant damage while providing an effective barrier to bacteria. Since the BCP MN can easily encapsulate model drugs, the MN adhesive may serve as an effective drug delivery vehicle to enhance the penetration of drugs into tissue. Due to its capacity to conform to tissues with a broad range of surface textures, the BCP MN system has the potential for use in a wider range of medical applications than current tape-based adhesives.
Methods
Fabrication of the microneedle (MN) array patch
Polystyrene-block-poly(acrylic acid) (PS-b-PAA) was prepared by hydrolysis of polystyrene-block-poly(tert-butyl acrylate) (PS-b-PtBA) (0.5g, Mn: 26k–128k, Polymer Source, Inc.) in dry dichloromethane (20ml) with trifluoroacetic acid (1.2 molar equivalent compared to tert-butyl ester groups) as a catalyst for 48 hrs. Then, PS-b-PAA was precipitated into hexane, filtered, and washed several times to remove any trace of the catalyst. Hydrolysis was confirmed by NMR (Supplementary Fig. S2). The number average molecular weight (Mn) of PS-b-PAA used for the swellable polymer was 26 kg mol-1 for PS and 76 kg mol-1 for PAA blocks. PS-b-PAAs with different compositions were also prepared by hydrolysis of PS-b-PtBAs (Mn: 19k–729k (PDI:1.23) and 24k–36k (PDI:1.09), Polymer Source, Inc.) as described above. A female PDMS mold for the MN array (10 × 10) of 1 cm2 was prepared using photolithography and molding techniques as previously reported37. Briefly, to fabricate a female master mold, 1 mm thick SU 8 film was spin-coated onto a Si wafer and exposed to UV light (365 nm, 10W/cm2) through a chrome mask patterned with 300 µm diameter dots. The UV exposure was performed at an angle of 20° on a rotating stage at 10 rpm for 450 sec. After developing, each conical cavity was 700 µm deep with a base diameter of 280 µm and tip radius of 10 µm. Tip-to-tip spacing between cavities was 950 µm. Female PDMS (Sylgard 184, Dow corning) molds were obtained from male PDMS molds cast from the female master mold. The first layer of the MN patch was prepared by solvent casting the PS-b-PAA dissolved in DMF for 48 hrs followed by degassing and the mass of material in the MN tips was controlled by altering the concentration of casting solution. To fabricate double-layered MN, PS pellets (Mw: 100k, PDI: 1.06, Polysciences, Inc.) were melted on solvent-casted PS-b-PAA at 180 °C and then stored under vacuum for 4 hrs. After cooling to room temperature, double-layered MN arrays (BCP MN) were gently peeled from the mold. Single PS MN arrays were prepared by melting PS pellets in molds at 180°C under vacuum for 4hrs. To fabricate a flexible MN patch (Flex BCP MN), styrene-isoprene-styrene copolymer (weight fraction of PS: 22%, Aldrich) was used in place of the PS 2nd layer via melt casting on the underlying PS-b-PAA layer. To fabricate flat PS-b-PAA substrates for adhesion testing, PS-b-PAA was solvent casted on PDMS flat substrates (1 cm × 1 cm × 0.5 cm square well) for 48 hrs and then PS was filled by melt casting at 180 °C for 4hrs. Flat PS samples were prepared by melt casting flat PDMS molds with PS. The morphology of MN was examined with optical microscopy (E100, Nikon).
Swelling and mechanical properties of PAA homopolymer and PS-b-PAAs
PAA homopolymer (Mv: 450,000, Aldrich) and PS-b-PAAs were dissolved in DMF and cast in PDMS wells followed by drying for 7 days at room temperature in a fume hood. Casted films with a thickness of ~ 1 mm were cut using a 4 mm diameter biopsy punch and the punctured discs were subsequently dried at 180°C for 4hrs. After cooling at room temperature, discs were immersed in PBS buffer (pH 7.4) at room temperature. The mass of each sample was measured after removal of surface water at each time point. The compressive modulus of polymer samples was characterized after they reached their maximum swollen state. The samples placed in a water bath were subjected to a compressive axial load at a strain rate of 0.5 mm/min using an eXpert 760 mechanical tester (ADMET, Inc.) at room temperature. The load-displacement data was transformed to stress-strain plots. The slope of a linear fit for 5% strain was used as a measure of the compressive modulus. The mean compressive modulus was measured from n=5 different samples.
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurement to examine the surface composition of PS-b-PAA films
To examine the surface composition of the swellable BCP MN at the PDMS (air interface following removal from the mold) and PS core interfaces, we prepared PDMS and PS substrates. For the PS-grafted surface, a hydroxyl-terminated polystyrene (PS-OH, Mn=10,000 g mol−1, PDI=1.08, Polymer Source Inc.) solution in toluene was spin-coated onto Si wafer, cleaned by immersion for 20 min at 85 °C in a piranha solution (1:4 mixture of 30% H2O2 and concentrated sulfuric acid). The grafting of PS on the Si substrate was completed by annealing the samples at 170 °C under vacuum for 1 day. Unbound PS-OHs were removed by sonication in toluene before use. The thickness of the PS brush was measured to be 7–8 nm by using an ellipsometer (JA Woollam company, Model WVASE32). A PS-b-PAA (26k–76k) solution in DMF was cast on the PDMS and the PS-grafted Si wafer for 2 days and then dried at 180°C for 4 hrs. After cooling in air to room temperature, the prepared films were peeled from the substrates using double-side tape. Elemental analysis of the bottom surface of the PS-b-PAA film that contacted the PDMS or PS brush was examined by XPS (Surface Science, model SSX-100) with a monochromatic Al Kα X-ray source.
Visualization of BCP MN shape change by swelling within a hydrogel substrate or animal tissue
To observe the swelling behavior of the MN, one row of MNs was cut from an array attached to a metal specimen, and swelling of the MN was recorded using inverted microscope after insertion into a 1.4 wt% agarose hydrogel (Supplementary Fig. S4). Shape change of BCP MNs by swelling in animal tissue was assessed using Optical Frequency Domain Imaging (OFDI)27, a second generation Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) technology. In short, light from a wavelength-swept laser source (1220–1360 nm) was split into reference and sample arm by means of a fiberized interferometer. The sample light was focused into a spot with 30 µm waist radius and scanned over the tissue. The reflected light was recombined with the reference signal prior to detection, digitized, and reconstructed to yield the depth resolved scattering profile at each scanning position. BCP MNs were inserted frontally into a cube of chicken muscle, close to the top tissue surface to enable imaging with OFDI. An area of 5 × 3 mm, consisting of 1024 × 512 depth profiles, was scanned at a 2 min interval. The reconstructed cross-sectional images showed signal void regions in the area of the BCP MNs, contrasted by a high scattering signal from the surrounding tissue. Minimum intensity projections along the lateral direction of MNs were taken after smoothing the tomograms to reduce speckle and provided a clear view of the shape profile of MNs.
Measurement of adhesion force with porcine skin
Full thickness porcine cadaver skin was stored frozen and cut into ~ 2 cm × 2 cm patches followed by immersion in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) for 1hr. For semi-dry adhesion tests, water was removed from the surface of porcine skin with blotting paper and the skin was dried on blotting paper for several minutes until 10~ 20 % of the absorbed water was removed. For wet adhesion testing, 200µl of PBS buffer was spread across the surface of porcine skin before adhesion tests. Normal adhesion tests for samples with an area of 1 cm2 were performed using an eXpert 760 mechanical tester (ADMET, Inc.) with custom-fabricated stainless steel tissue grips and a 50 N load cell. This methodology was selected to enable comparison with the adhesive performance of staples. A flat section of skin tissue was affixed using cyanoacrylate glue to a test fixture (i.e. pin mount stub with diameter of 25.4 mm) and mounted within the lower grips at the base of the mechanical tester. The MN (10 × 10 microneedles array in 1cm2) or flat patch were glued onto the opposing test fixture and fixed between the upper grips of mechanical tester. Test samples were applied to tissues with 10 N of preload at 100 mm/min, and held in position for 2, 5, 10, 30 min, or 6hr. Samples were displaced at a rate of 1 mm/min and the force was recorded. Dynamic adhesion testing was conducted on the shaved wrist of a pig following euthanasia. To ensure the surface was wet prior to testing, 1 ml of PBS buffer was spread over the skin before applying a microneedle patch. The degree of local skin elongation while moving the wrist from extension to maximum flexion was determined. A Flex BCP MN array with 10 × 10 MN in 1 cm2 was adhered by applying manual compression for 10 minutes. The pig wrist was then subjected to dynamic testing (extension to maximum flexion, back to extension) through 100 cycles to determine its fixation (Supplementary Movie 4).
Measurement of contact area and adhesion force between skin graft and underlying muscle tissue
Unmeshed porcine skin grafts with a thickness of 200 µm were obtained from the back of postmortem pigs using a dermatome immediately after euthanasia, in accordance with animal health and welfare policies. They were kept in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) at 4°C and used within 2 weeks of harvest. To examine the contact area between the adhesive patch and underlying tissue, dye diffusion tests were performed. After application of the MN patch or staples, the skin graft (1.5 cm × 1.5 cm) was pre-soaked in 0.1 wt% solution of Rhodamine dye for 10 mins and transferred onto a 4 wt% agarose hydrogel after removal of the excess dye solution. Staples or a BCP MN adhesive were applied to fix the skin graft onto the hydrogel for 2 mins. The contact area was determined by the dye-transferred region via image analysis software. For adhesion tests, skin grafts were cut into 1.5 cm × 1.5 cm patches and placed on a flat section of muscle tissue (2.5 cm × 2.5 cm) that had been affixed using cyanoacrylate glue to the bottom test fixture. The MN patches (10 × 10 microneedles array in 1cm2) were glued to the top fixture of the mechanical tester and applied to the underlying intestine tissue with 20 N of preload at 150 mm/min and held in position for 10 min. Samples were then displaced at a rate of 1 mm/min and the force was recorded. To compare adhesion force between the stapled skin graft and underlying muscle tissue, staples were applied to the perimeter of the skin graft with spacing of 1.3 ~ 1.5 cm using a skin stapler (Reflex® One, CONMED). For experiments with the MN patch, the same preload (10 N) was used and a pin mount stub with a diameter of 12 mm was applied to the stapled skin graft. For the duration of all experiments, the tissue was kept moist with PBS.
In vitro assessment of bacterial infiltration
BL21(DE3) competent E.coli (New England Biolabs) was transformed with pFluoroGreen™ (EDVO-Kit 223, EDVOTEK) and cultured on ampicillin and IPTG supplemented LB agar plates. A GFP positive colony was picked to inoculate a 10 mL standard LB broth supplemented with ampicillin and IPTG. The GFP-expressing E. coli was cultured overnight at 37°C and was diluted by 103-fold into PBS buffer. This dilution yielded an inoculum of ~ 2 × 104 colony forming units (CFUs)/mL. To prepare LB agar plates, LB agar medium powder (MP Biomedicals, LLC) was added to deionized water and autoclaved at 121 °C for 15 mins. After cooling to 50°C, 15 mL of molten agar was supplemented with ampicillin and IPTG, poured into sterile petri dishes (100 × 15 mm) and allowed to solidify. A 50 µL solution of bacteria (~ 1000 cells) was pipetted onto the center of the incised skin grafts (250 µm thick) placed on LB agar plate after applying staples or the BCP MN adhesive. To investigate the effect of staple holes on bacteria infiltration, the interface of two incised skin grafts was tightly sealed using cyanoacrylate glue before stapling. Testing plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 hrs and were observed for the growth of GFP-expressing E. coli to examine the bacterial barrier resistance of the incised skin grafts closed by a BCP MN adhesive or staples (n=3).
Measurement of adhesion and torsional force with porcine small intestine
Fresh intestine tissue was rinsed with PBS buffer several times and then cut into ~ 2 cm × 2 cm patches. Surface water was removed with blotting paper while mucin remained on the inner surface of the intestine. Topography for the inner and outer surface of intestine tissue was measured by using a depth profiler (Sloan Dektak II) after freezing the tissue at − 20 °C. Normal adhesion tests were conducted using the same experimental set-up for porcine skin. For the duration of all experiments, the tissue was kept moist with phosphate buffered saline. The mean adhesion force was measured from n=5 different samples. Torsion tests were conducted using a biaxial tranceducer followed by the same experimental procedures used for the normal adhesion test. Samples inserted into tissue were rotated at a rate of 0.5 degree/sec by 60 or 100 degree, and the force was recorded. Following the torsion test, breakage of MN was examined via macroscopic images.
Controlled release of drugs from swellable tips of BCP MN adhesive
Triamcinolone acetonide (TACA, Fluka) was loaded in the tips of BCP MN patch (100 MNs in 1 cm2) via swelling in a TACA solution (4 ml) of 1 mg/ml dissolved in methanol. Following 30 mins incubation, the BCP MN patch was washed by dipping in DI water, excess water on the surface of the needles was removed, and then the patches were dried at room temperature for 1hr. Drug loaded BCP MN patches were placed into 6 ml of fresh DI water to examine the release of encapsulated TACA. 0.6 ml of the solution was sampled at each time point, and 0.6 ml of the fresh DI water was replaced. The amount of released TACA was determined by HPLC system (Agilent 1100 series) with C18 column (5 µm) (250x4.6 mm ID, Agilent Eclipse XDB-C18) at 240 nm with an Agilent G1314A detector. Peak identification was achieved based on the comparison of retention times of compounds within standard solutions using ChemStation software (Agilent Technologies).
Statistics
Unless otherwise stated, all experiments were performed using at least 5 samples per group and the data presented are representative of 5 independent experiments. For multiple comparisons, analysis of variance was performed with the Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) test at significance levels of 95%. Error bars in bar graphs represent the standard deviation.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank ADMET Inc. for providing an eXpert 760 mechanical tester that was instrumental for this work. Funding for this research was provided by the NIH grant GM086433 to JMK, NIH grant P41EB015903 to BEB, and the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant (2012039055) funded by the Korean Government (Ministry of Education, Science and Technology). This work was performed in part through the use of MIT’s Microsystems Technology Laboratories (MTL) and Harvard’s Center for Nanoscale Systems (CNS). We would like to thank Albert Kwon for providing E. coli and Dr. Bryan Laulicht for helpful discussions.
Footnotes
Author contributions
S.Y.Y. and J.M.K. conceptualized and directed the research project. S.Y.Y., J.M.K., E.D.O prepared the manuscript. S.Y.Y., E.D.O., G.C.S., K.M.P., W.K.C., M.V., B.E.B., and B.P. performed the experiments and data analysis with J.M.K. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.
The authors declare no competing financial interests. Supplementary information accompanies this paper. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to J.M.K.
References
- 1.Majumder A, Ghatak A, Sharma A. Microfluidic Adhesion Induced by Subsurface Microstructures. Science. 2007;318:258–261. doi: 10.1126/science.1145839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Karp JM, Langer R. Dry solution to a sticky problem. Nature. 2011;477:42–43. doi: 10.1038/477042a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Vote BJ, Elder MJ. Cyanoacrylate glue for corneal perforations: a description of a surgical technique and a review of the literature. Clin. Experiment. Ophthalmol. 2000;28:437–442. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-9071.2000.00351.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lauto A, Mawad D, Foster LJR. Adhesive biomaterials for tissue reconstruction. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2008;83:464–472. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Artzi N, Shazly T, Baker AB, Bon A, Edelman ER. Aldehyde-Amine Chemistry Enables Modulated Biosealants with Tissue-Specific Adhesion. Adv. Mater. 2009;21:3399–3403. doi: 10.1002/adma.200900340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Strehin I, Nahas Z, Arora K, Nguyen T, Elisseeff J. A versatile pH sensitive chondroitin sulfate–PEG tissue adhesive and hydrogel. Biomaterials. 2010;31:2788–2797. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.12.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hida K, et al. Nonsuture dural repair using polyglycolic acid mesh and fibrin glue: clinical application to spinal surgery. Surg. Neurol. 2006;65:136–142. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2005.07.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cimador M, Castagnetti M, Milazzo M, Sergio M, Grazia ED. Suture materials: do they affect fistula and stricture rates in flap urethroplasties? Urol. Int. 2004;73:320–324. doi: 10.1159/000081592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Murray KD, Ho C-H, Hsia J-YJ, Little AG. The Influence of Pulmonary Staple Line Reinforcement on Air Leaks. Chest. 2002;122:2146–2149. doi: 10.1378/chest.122.6.2146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Rosser JC, Rosser LE, Savalgi RS. Skill Acquisition and Assessment for Laparoscopic Surgery. Arch. Surg. 1997;132:200–204. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430260098021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ferzli GS, Frezza EE, Pecoraro AM, Ahern KD. Prospective randomized study of stapled versus unstapled mesh in a laparoscopic preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 1999;188:461–465. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(99)00039-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Smith TO, Sexton D, Mann C, Donell S. Sutures versus staples for skin closure in orthopaedic surgery: meta-analysis. BMJ. 2010;340:1–8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c1199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kim J, Stevenson TR. Abdominoplasty, liposuction of the flanks, and obesity: Analyzing risk factors for seroma formation. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2006;117:773–779. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000200056.57357.3f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pepicello J, Yavorek H. Five year experience with tape closure of abdominal wounds. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 1989;169:310–314. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Harold KL, et al. Optimal closure method of five-millimeter trocar sites. Am. J. Surg. 2004;187:24–27. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Coulthard P, et al. Tissue adhesives for closure of surgical incisions. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2010;5:CD004287. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004287.pub2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hollinsky C, et al. Comparison of a New Self-Gripping Mesh with Other Fixation Methods for Laparoscopic Hernia Repair in a Rat Model. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2009;208:1107–1114. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.01.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hammond RA. The Proboscis Mechanism of Acanthocephalus Ranae. J. Exp. Biol. 1966;45:203–213. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Reed ML, Han H, Weiss LE. Silicon micro-velcro. Adv. Mater. 1992;4:48–51. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mori H, Muller AHE. New polymeric architectures with (meth)acrylic acid segments. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2003;28:1403–1439. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Xu C, et al. Reversible Stimuli-Responsive Nanostructures Assembled from Amphiphilic Block Copolymers. Nano Lett. 2006;6:282–287. doi: 10.1021/nl052332d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Förster S, Antonietti M. Amphiphilic Block Copolymers in Structure-Controlled Nanomaterial Hybrids. Adv. Mater. 1998;10:195–217. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Weidisch R, et al. A Novel Scheme for Prediction of Deformation Mechanisms of Block Copolymers Based on Phase Behavior. Macromolecules. 2001;34:2528–2535. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Arndt KF, et al. Poly(vinyl alcohol)/poly(acrylic acid) hydrogels: FT-IR spectroscopic characterization of crosslinking reaction and work at transition point. Acta Polym. 1999;50:383–390. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Nagarajan S, Russell TP, Watkins JJ. Dual-Tone Patterned Mesoporous Silicate Films Templated From Chemically Amplified Block Copolymers. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2009;19:2728–2734. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sandby-Moller J, Poulsen T, Wulf HC. Epidermal thickness at different body sites: relationship to age, gender, pigmentation, blood content, skin type and smoking habits. Acta Derm. Venereol. 2003;83:410–413. doi: 10.1080/00015550310015419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Yun S, Tearney G, de Boer J, Iftimia N, Bouma B. High-speed optical frequency-domain imaging. Opt. Express. 2003;11:2953–2963. doi: 10.1364/oe.11.002953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Currie LJ, Sharpe JR, Martin R. The Use of Fibrin Glue in Skin Grafts and Tissue-Engineered Skin Replacements: A Review. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2001;108:1713–1726. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200111000-00045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Iwuagwu FC, Wilson D, Bailie F. The Use of Skin Grafts in Postburn Contracture Release: A 10-Year Review. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1999;103:1198–1204. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199904040-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gibran N, et al. Comparison of fibrin sealant and staples for attaching split-thickness autologous sheet grafts in patients with deep partial-or full-thickness burn wounds: a phase 1/2 clinical study. J. Burn Care Res. 2007;28:401–408. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0B013E318053D389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Gupta J, Gill HS, Andrews SN, Prausnitz MR. Kinetics of skin resealing after insertion of microneedles in human subjects. J. Control. Release. 2011;154:148–155. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.05.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Donnelly R, et al. Microneedle Arrays Allow Lower Microbial Penetration Than Hypodermic Needles In Vitro. Pharm. Res. 2009;26:2513–2522. doi: 10.1007/s11095-009-9967-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kwak MK, Jeong H-E, Suh KY. Rational Design and Enhanced Biocompatibility of a Dry Adhesive Medical Skin Patch. Adv. Mater. 2011;23:3949–3953. doi: 10.1002/adma.201101694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Chauvel-Lebret DJ, Pellen-Mussi P, Auroy P, Bonnaure-Mallet M. Evaluation of the in vitro biocompatibility of various elastomers. Biomaterials. 1999;20:291–299. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(98)00181-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.De Giglio E, et al. Biocompatibility of Poly(Acrylic Acid) Thin Coatings Electro-Synthesized onto TiAlV-based Implants. J. Bioact. Compat. Polym. 2010;25:374–391. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Banga AK. Microporation applications for enhancing drug delivery. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2009;6:343–354. doi: 10.1517/17425240902841935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Park J-H, Choi S-O, Seo S, Choy YB, Prausnitz MR. A microneedle roller for transdermal drug delivery. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2010;76:282–289. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2010.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.