Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section F: Structural Biology and Crystallization Communications logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section F: Structural Biology and Crystallization Communications
. 2013 Apr 30;69(Pt 5):528–531. doi: 10.1107/S1744309113007288

Expression, crystallization and preliminary X-ray crystallographic analysis of aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) from Bacillus cereus

Ho-Phuong-Thuy Ngo a,, Seung-Hye Hong b,, Deok-Kun Oh b,*, Lin-Woo Kang c,d,*
PMCID: PMC3660893  PMID: 23695569

Aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) catalyses the oxidation of aldehydes using NAD(P)+ as a cofactor. The aldh gene from B. cereus was cloned; the protein was expressed, purified and crystallized, and a preliminary X-ray crystallography analysis was performed.

Keywords: aldehyde dehydrogenases, ALDH, Bacillus cereus

Abstract

Aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) catalyses the oxidation of aldehydes using NAD(P)+ as a cofactor. Most aldehydes are toxic at low levels. ALDHs are used to regulate metabolic intermediate aldehydes. The aldh gene from Bacillus cereus was cloned and the ALDH protein was expressed, purified and crystallized. A crystal of the ALDH protein diffracted to 2.6 Å resolution and belonged to the monoclinic space group P21, with unit-cell parameters a = 83.5, b = 93.3, c = 145.5 Å, β = 98.05°. Four protomers were present in the asymmetric unit, with a corresponding V M of 2.55 Å3 Da−1 and a solvent content of 51.8%.

1. Introduction  

In nature, various metabolic intermediate aldehydes are ubiquitous. Owing to their chemical reactivity, most aldehydes are toxic, even at low levels. It appears that most organisms utilize several kinds of aldehyde dehydrogenases (ALDHs) to regulate metabolic intermediate aldehydes (O’Brien et al., 2005). Aldehyde dehydogenases (EC 1.2.1.3), which are classed as oxidoreductases, catalyse the oxidation (dehydrogenation) of aldehydes using NAD(P)+ as a cofactor. These enzymes exist as tetramers comprised of 54 kDa subunits.

The active site of aldehyde dehydrogenase is well conserved throughout the different classes of the enzymes (Perozich et al., 1999). In the aldehyde dehydrogenase structure, the substrate aldehyde and the NAD(P)+ cofactor are bound to the active site (Gonzalez-Segura et al., 2009). The catalytic cysteine residue (Cys300 in Bacillus cereus) forms a thiohemiacetal covalent intermediate with the aldehyde substrate via nucleophilic attack (Cobessi et al., 2000). Because of the free thiol in the catalytic cysteine, ALDH is unstable. Thus, the enzyme must be kept in a reducing-agent [dithiothreitol (DTT)]-containing buffer solution or be stored at low temperature (Jo et al., 2008; Rothacker & Ilg, 2008).

B. cereus is a mesophilic, facultative anaerobic bacterium (Kim et al., 2000) and is found in a wide range of habitats, e.g. in soil and vegetation (Tayabali & Seligy, 2000). In B. cereus, aldedh is one of the three reported genes that encode ALDH. The aldedh-encoded ALDH contains 494 amino-acid residues and shares 53.8% sequence identity with human ALDH. Even though the DNA sequence of B. cereus aldehyde dehydrogenase has been reported, the structure of ALDH is still lacking. As the first step to understanding the detoxification mechanism of ALDH from B. cereus, we studied the cloning and expression of the aldedh gene and the purification, crystallization and preliminary X-ray crystallographic analysis of the aldedh-encoded ALDH.

2. Materials and methods  

2.1. Cloning  

The genomic DNA from B. cereus ATCC 10876 was extracted using a genomic DNA extraction kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The aldedh gene (1485 bp) encoding for an aldehyde dehydrogenase was amplified by PCR using the genomic DNA isolated from B. cereus as a template. The sequences of the oligonucleotide primers used for gene cloning were based on the DNA sequence of B. cereus aldehyde dehydrogenase (GenBank accession No. ACLT01000061.1). Forward (5′-GGATCCGATGTTAAAGACAAATATTGAGCTG-3′) and reverse primers (5′-GCGGCCGCTTACTTTATATTTACCCAAACA-3′) were designed to introduce the BamHI and NotI restriction sites (bold), respectively. The PCR-amplified DNA fragments were purified using a QIAquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), inserted into the pRSFDuet-1 vector digested with the same restriction enzymes and ligated into the BamHI and NotI sites of pRSFDuet-1. The resulting plasmid was transformed into Escherichia coli ER2566 and plated on Luria–Bertani (LB) agar containing 20 µg ml−1 kanamycin. A kanamycin-resistant colony was selected and plasmid DNA from the transformant was isolated using a plasmid purification kit (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin, USA). DNA sequencing to confirm the cloning was carried out at the Macrogen facility (Seoul, Republic of Korea).

2.2. Overexpression and purification  

The recombinant E. coli cells containing aldehyde dehydrogenase/pRSFDuet-1 gene, coding for residues 1–494, were cultivated in a 2 l flask containing 500 ml LB medium and 20 µg ml−1 kanamycin at 310 K with shaking at 200 rev min−1. When the optical density of bacteria reached 0.6 at 600 nm, isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside was added to a final concentration of 0.1 mM to induce ALDH expression. The culture was incubated with shaking at 150 rev min−1 at 288 K for an additional 12 h to obtain the highest expression level. The cells were harvested by centrifugation for 20 min at 6000g at 277 K, washed twice with 0.85% NaCl and resuspended in 50 mM phosphate buffer containing 300 mM KCl and 10 mM imidazole. The resuspended cells were disrupted on ice by using a sonicator (Sonic Vibra Cell, Sonics & Material Inc.). The unbroken cells and cell debris were removed by centrifugation at 13 000g for 10 min at 277 K and the supernatant was filtered through a 0.45 µm filter. The filtrate was applied onto an immobilized metal-ion affinity chromatography cartridge (Bio-Rad, Hercules, California, USA) equilibrated with 50 mM phosphate buffer pH 8.0. The cartridge was washed extensively with the same buffer, and the bound protein was eluted with a linear gradient from 10 to 250 mM imidazole at a flow rate of 1 ml min−1. The eluate was collected and immediately loaded onto a Bio-Gel P-6 desalting cartridge (Bio-Rad), equilibrated with 50 mM piperazine-N,N′-bis(2-ethanesulfonic acid) (PIPES) buffer pH 7.5. The loaded protein was eluted with 50 mM PIPES buffer pH 7.5 at a flow rate of 1 ml min−1 and the fractions containing eluted protein were collected. The homogeneity of the purified protein was analysed via SDS–PAGE (Fig. 1). The molecular weight of purified ALDH is 55.6 kDa instead of 54 kDa because 13 additional residues from the pRSF Duet-1 vector remained at the N-terminus of ALDH (Supplementary Table 1 1). For crystallization, purified B. cereus ALDH was dialysed for 4 h in buffer A (25 mM Tris, 15 mM NaCl, 3 mM β-mercaptoethanol) and concentrated to a final concentration of 10 mg ml−1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Purified B. cereus ALDH is shown on a 10% SDS–PAGE gel (lane P). Lane M contains molecular-mass markers (labelled in kDa).

Table 1. Data-collection statistics.

Values in parentheses are for the outer shell.

X-ray source Beamline 5C SBII, PLS
Wavelength (Å) 0.97951
Unit-cell parameters (Å, °) a = 83.5, b = 93.3, c = 145.5, α = γ = 90°, β = 98.05°
Total rotation (°) 360
Mosaicity (°) 0.73
Multiplicity 7.4 (7.1)
Space group P21
Resolution (Å) 50.0–2.6 (2.64–2.6)
No. of observations 500404
No. of unique reflections 67464
Completeness (%) 99.2 (97.7)
R merge (%) 4.6 (7.5)
I/σ(I)〉 69.7 (46.9)

R merge = Inline graphic Inline graphic, where I(hkl) is the intensity of reflection hkl, Inline graphic is the sum over all reflections and Inline graphic is the sum over i measurements of reflection hkl.

2.3. Crystallization and X-ray data collection  

Initial crystallization was carried out at 287 K by the sitting-drop vapour-diffusion method in 96-well IntelliPlates (Art Robbins) using a Hydra II e-drop automated pipetting system (Matrix) and screening kits from Hampton Research (Index, Crystal Screen, Crystal Screen Cryo, Crystal Lite and PEGRx 1 and 2), Emerald Biosystems (Wizard Classic 1 and 2) and Molecular Dimensions (Morpheus MD1-46 kit). 0.5 µl protein solution was mixed with 0.5 µl reservoir solution and equilibrated against 70 µl reservoir solution. After 3 d, small crystals were observed from four conditions. Crystals were reproduced and optimized using condition H7 from Index (Hampton Research) [0.15 M dl-malic acid pH 7.0, 20%(w/v) PEG 3350] by the hanging-drop method, in which the drops consisted of 0.9 µl protein solution mixed with 0.9 µl reservoir solution (Fig. 2 a). Each hanging drop was positioned over 1 ml reservoir solution. Optimization was achieved by varying the concentration of PEG 3350 (10–22%) and dl-malic acid pH 7.0 (0.12–0.18 M). In total, 48 optimization drops were set up. Rhombohedral-shaped crystals with adequate dimensions were obtained after 1 week using a reservoir solution consisting of 0.15 M dl-malic acid pH 7.0, 18%(w/v) PEG 3350 (Fig. 2 b). The fully grown crystals (0.25 × 0.2 × 0.05 mm) were flash-cooled at 100 K in liquid nitrogen using 20%(v/v) glycerol, 0.15 M dl-malic acid pH 7.0 and 20%(w/v) PEG 3350 as a cryoprotectant. X-ray diffraction data were collected from the cryoprotected crystal (at 100 K) using 1° oscillations with a crystal-to-detector distance of 400 mm, using an ADSC Q315r detector on beamline 5C SBII of the Pohang Light Source (PLS), Republic of Korea. The crystals diffracted to 2.6 Å resolution. Diffraction data were integrated and scaled using the HKL-2000 program package (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Crystals of B. cereus ALDH. (a) Initial crystals obtained after 3 d using a reservoir solution consisting of 0.15 M dl-malic acid pH 7.0, 20% PEG 3350 from Index (Hampton Research). (b) Optimized crystal of ALDH with dimensions of 0.25 × 0.2 × 0.05 mm obtained using 0.15 M dl-malic acid pH 7.0, 18% PEG 3350. The scale bar represents 0.05 mm.

3. Results and discussion  

The crystals belonged to the crystallographic space group P21. The unit-cell parameters were a = 83.5, b = 93.3, c = 145.5 Å, β = 98.05°. The space group was assigned by auto-indexing (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997) and data-collection statistics are provided in Table 1. According to the Matthews coefficient calculation (Matthews, 1968), there are probably four molecules in the asymmetric unit, corresponding to a V M of 2.55 Å3 Da−1 and a solvent content of 51.8%. Self-rotation functions were calculated at χ = 180°, 120°, 90° and 60° to detect twofold, threefold, fourfold and sixfold symmetry, respectively. The self-rotation function was calculated using data from 50 to 4 Å using MOLREP (Vagin & Teplyakov, 2010). Based on this self-rotation calculation (Fig. 3), the crystal contains additional twofold and threefold noncrystallographic symmetry different from crystallographic twofold symmetry. Molecular replacement (MR) using Phaser from the CCP4 program package (McCoy et al., 2007) with aldehyde dehydrogenase from human (PDB entry 4fr8; Lang et al., 2012; 53.8% sequence identity) as a search model was successful and showed four protomers in the asymmetric unit. The initial R value from the molecular-replacement solution was 30.9%. The resulting electron-density maps were clear and fitted the model well. No clashes were found between molecules. After rigid-body and restrained refinement by REFMAC5 (Murshudov et al., 2011), the R value decreased to 24.3% and the R free was 30.1%. Currently, the structure is being refined. Final structural details will be described in a separate paper.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Self-rotation functions calculated using the ALDH crystal. (a) χ = 120°. (b) χ = 180°.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1744309113007288/nj5148sup1.pdf

f-69-00528-sup1.pdf (6.6KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to staff members at beamline 5C SBII of the Pohang Light Source (PLS), Republic of Korea. This paper was supported by Konkuk University in 2011.

Footnotes

1

Supplementary material has been deposited in the IUCr electronic archive (Reference: NJ5148).

References

  1. Cobessi, D., Tete-Favier, F., Marchal, S., Branlant, G. & Aubry, A. (2000). J. Mol. Biol. 300, 141–152. [DOI] [PubMed]
  2. Gonzalez-Segura, L., Rudino-Pinera, E., Munoz-Clares, R. A. & Horjales, E. (2009). J. Mol. Biol. 385, 542–557. [DOI] [PubMed]
  3. Jo, J.-E., Mohan Raj, S., Rathnasingh, C., Selvakumar, E., Jung, W.-C. & Park, S. (2008). Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 81, 51–60. [DOI] [PubMed]
  4. Kim, Y.-R., Czajka, J. & Batt, C. A. (2000). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66, 1453–1459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  5. Lang, B. S., Gorren, A. C., Oberdorfer, G., Wenzl, M. V., Furdui, C. M., Poole, L. B., Mayer, B. & Gruber, K. (2012). J. Biol. Chem. 287, 38124–38134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  6. McCoy, A. J., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Adams, P. D., Winn, M. D., Storoni, L. C. & Read, R. J. (2007). J. Appl. Cryst. 40, 658–674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  7. Matthews, B. W. (1968). J. Mol. Biol. 32, 491–497. [DOI] [PubMed]
  8. Murshudov, G. N., Skubák, P., Lebedev, A. A., Pannu, N. S., Steiner, R. A., Nicholls, R. A., Winn, M. D., Long, F. & Vagin, A. A. (2011). Acta Cryst. D67, 355–367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  9. O’Brien, P. J., Siraki, A. G. & Shangari, N. (2005). Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 35, 609–662. [DOI] [PubMed]
  10. Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods Enzymol. 277, 307–326. [DOI] [PubMed]
  11. Perozich, J., Nicholas, H., Wang, B.-C., Lindahl, R. & Hempel, J. (1999). Protein Sci. 8, 137–146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  12. Rothacker, B. & Ilg, T. (2008). Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 38, 354–366. [DOI] [PubMed]
  13. Tayabali, A. F. & Seligy, V. L. (2000). Environ. Health Perspect. 108, 919–930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  14. Vagin, A. & Teplyakov, A. (2010). Acta Cryst. D66, 22–25. [DOI] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1744309113007288/nj5148sup1.pdf

f-69-00528-sup1.pdf (6.6KB, pdf)

Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section F: Structural Biology and Crystallization Communications are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES