Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section F: Structural Biology and Crystallization Communications logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section F: Structural Biology and Crystallization Communications
. 2013 Apr 30;69(Pt 5):532–534. doi: 10.1107/S174430911300763X

Crystallization and preliminary X-ray diffraction analysis of the TetR-family transcriptional repressor YhgD from Bacillus halodurans

Hyun Ku Yeo a, Young Woo Park a, Jina Kang a, Jae Young Lee a,*
PMCID: PMC3660894  PMID: 23695570

Triclinic crystals of YhgD from B. halodurans have been obtained. X-ray data have been collected to 1.9 Å resolution using synchrotron radiation.

Keywords: YhgD, TetR family, transcriptional regulators

Abstract

YhgD is a member of the TetR-family transcription factors, which regulate genes encoding proteins involved in multidrug resistance, virulence, osmotic stress and pathogenicity. YhgD from the alkaliphilic bacterium Bacillus halodurans was cloned and overexpressed in Escherichia coli. YhgD (Bh2145) from B. halodurans is composed of 193 amino-acid residues with a molecular mass of 21 853 Da. YhgD was crystallized at 296 K using ethylene glycol as a precipitant by the sitting-drop vapour-diffusion method. The crystal diffracted to 1.9 Å resolution and belonged to the apparent triclinic space group P1, with unit-cell parameters a = 37.22, b = 47.85, c = 54.15 Å, α = 92.75, β = 107.9, γ = 90.27°. The asymmetric unit is likely to contain two molecules of monomeric YhgD, giving a crystal volume per mass (V M) of 2.05 Å3 Da−1 and a solvent content of 40.2%.

1. Introduction  

A living organism must adapt rapidly to environmental changes for its survival. In many cases, the adaptation of an organism is mediated by gene expression and/or transcriptional regulation. The TetR family of transcriptional regulators control genes encoding proteins involved in multidrug resistance, virulence, osmotic stress and pathogenicity of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria (Ramos et al., 2005). The TetR protein regulates the expression of the tet genes, the products of which possess resistance to tetracycline (Hinrichs et al., 1994). Most members of the TetR family have two domains with a highly homologous N-terminal domain of ∼45 residues, a DNA-binding helix–turn–helix (HTH) motif that transduces the signals and a signal-receiving effector domain (Schumacher et al., 2002).

Sequence similarity suggests that YhgD (Bh2145) from Bacillus halodurans is a member of the TetR-family transcription factors (Pfam PF00440). The N-terminal domain (residues 9–55) of the B. halodurans YhgD protein shows significant sequence similarity to the N-­terminal HTH domain of the TetR family of transcriptional regulators. These include Escherichia coli TetR (Swiss-Prot ID P04483; 26% sequence identity for residues 9–55), Staphylococcus aureus QacR (P0A0N4; 36% sequence identity for residues 7–53), Vibrio cholerae HapR (Q1WDD2; 30% sequence identity for residues 22–68), Vibrio vulnificus SmcR (Q9L8G8; 30% sequence identity for residues 21–67) and E. coli RutR (P0ACU2; 45% sequence identity for residues 23–69). Several structures of TetR-family proteins have been determined, including those of E. coli TetR, S. aureus QacR, V. cholerae HapR, Mycobacterium tuberculosis EthR, V. vulnificus SmcR and E. coli RutR (Hinrichs et al., 1994; Schumacher et al., 2001; De Silva et al., 2007; Dover et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2010). The structures of TetR-family proteins from different species have revealed that no sequence conservation exists outside the HTH domain, although the three-dimensional structures of TetR-family proteins are almost identical.

B. halodurans is an alkaliphilic bacterium that grows well above pH 9.5 and its genome has been completely sequenced (Takami et al., 2000). The yhgD gene (Bh2145) from B. halodurans encodes a protein of 193 amino-acid residues with 35% sequence identity to B. subtilis YhgD and 27% sequence identity to E. coli RutR based on the BLAST program. E. coli RutR, which is encoded by the ycdC gene, regulates genes associated with pyrimidine and purine catabolism, the synthesis of glutamine and the transport of glutamate (Shimada et al., 2007, 2008; Nguyen Ple et al., 2010). The crystal structure of E. coli RutR revealed that it is a homodimer, and one uracil molecule was incorporated at the C-terminal domain in each subunit. Because functional or structural studies of YhgD have not been reported, it would be interesting to determine the structure of YhgD from B. halodurans. As a first step, we report here the cloning, purification, crystallization and preliminary X-ray diffraction data of B. halodurans YhgD.

2. Materials and methods  

2.1. Expression and purification  

The gene encoding YhgD (Bh2145) was amplified by the polymerase chain reaction using the genomic DNA of B. halodurans as template. It was inserted into the NdeI/XhoI-digested expression vector pET-28b(+) (Novagen, Germany) containing a hexahistidine tag at its N-terminus. The recombinant B. halodurans YhgD protein was expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) Star pLysS cells (Invitrogen, USA). The cells were grown at 310 K to an OD600 of ∼0.5 in Luria–Bertani medium supplemented with 30 µg ml−1 kanamycin and chloramphenicol. Protein expression was induced by 1.0 mM isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG). Cell growth continued at 303 K for 4 h after IPTG induction and the cells were harvested by centrifugation at 7000g for 10 min at 277 K.

The cell pellet was resuspended in lysis buffer [20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 0.5 M NaCl, 10%(v/v) glycerol, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride] and homogenized with an ultrasonic processor. The insol­uble fraction including cellular debris was removed by centrifugation at 40 000g for 60 min at 277 K and the recombinant protein in the supernatant fraction was purified using three chromatographic steps at 277 K. The first step was metal-chelate chromatography on Ni–NTA resin (GE Healthcare, UK). The His-tagged YhgD protein was eluted with buffer A [20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 0.5 M NaCl, 10%(v/v) glycerol] containing 300 mM imidazole followed by enzymatic removal of the His-tag by overnight incubation with homemade PreScission protease. The PreScission protease recognizes the sequence Leu–Phe–Gln/Gly–Pro. Three additional residues (Gly–Pro–His) remained at the N-terminus. The uncleaved His-tagged protein and PreScission protease were removed from the target YhgD by application onto an Ni–NTA affinity column. The next step was gel filtration on a Superdex 200 column (GE Healthcare, UK) employing an elution buffer consisting of 0.2 M NaCl, 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 1 mM DTT, 5 mM MgCl2, 5%(v/v) glycerol. The purified protein was concentrated to 30 mg ml−1 using Centricon YM-10 (Millipore) and aliquots of the protein were stored at 193 K.

2.2. Crystallization  

Crystallization conditions for YhgD were screened with a Mosquito Crystallization Robot (TTP LabTech, UK) using various commercial screening solution kits (Hampton Research, USA; Qiagen, Germany; Axygen, USA; Emerald Biosystems, USA). Crystals were obtained by the sitting-drop vapour-diffusion method using 96-well Crystal Quick plates (Greiner Bio-One, Germany); each crystallization drop was prepared by mixing 0.2 µl reservoir solution and 0.2 µl protein solution. Crystals were initially obtained in 25%(v/v) ethylene glycol, which was optimized to 22.5%(v/v) ethylene glycol, 0.015 mM CYMAL-7 by the addition of additive solutions according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Hampton Research, USA). The crystals of B. halodurans YhgD used for data collection were grown by mixing equal volumes (0.5 µl) of protein and reservoir solution and 0.1 µl of additive solution and equilibrating the mixed solutions against 100 µl reservoir solution in a 96-well plate at 296 K.

2.3. X-ray data collection  

Crystals were transferred into a cryoprotectant solution containing 30%(v/v) ethylene glycol and 10%(v/v) glycerol and immediately flash-cooled in liquid nitrogen. X-ray diffraction data were collected at 100 K on an ADSC Quantum 210 CCD image-plate detector using synchrotron radiation on beamline 7A of the Pohang Accelerator Laboratory, Pohang, Republic of Korea. The data were collected using a 1° oscillation per image with a crystal-to-detector distance of 200 mm. The crystal was exposed to X-rays for 1 s per image and a total of 270 frames were recorded. Data were processed with MOSFLM through the iMOSFLM interface (Leslie, 2006; Battye et al., 2011) and scaled with SCALA (Evans, 2006) using the CCP4i interface (Potterton et al., 2003).

3. Results and discussion  

The recombinant B. halodurans YhgD protein was expressed in an E. coli system and purified to give a final yield of ∼18 mg per litre of culture. The protein was purified by three steps of chromatography to homogeneity as estimated by 12% SDS–PAGE. The crystals were obtained reproducibly by sitting-drop vapour diffusion at 296 K from optimized reservoir solution consisting of 22.5%(v/v) ethylene glycol, 0.015 mM CYMAL-7. They grew to dimensions of approximately 0.05 × 0.05 × 0.15 mm within 2 d (Fig. 1). A total of 26 151 unique reflections were measured with a redundancy of 2.8 (Fig. 2). The merged data set was 93.5% complete to 1.90 Å resolution and gives an R merge (on intensity) of 5.9%. The crystals belonged to the triclinic space group P1, with unit-cell parameters a = 37.22, b = 47.85, c = 54.15 Å, α = 92.75, β = 107.9, γ = 90.27°. Self-rotation functions were calculated using the programs MOLREP and POLARRFN from the CCP4 suite (Winn et al., 2011). They consistently showed a moderate peak with 38–47% of the original peak in the κ = 180° section, while the κ = 120° section did not show any significant peaks. The self-rotation peak indicated the existence of noncrystallographic twofold symmetry. The asymmetric unit is likely to contain two molecules of monomeric YhgD, giving a crystal volume per mass (V M) of 2.05 Å3 Da−1 and a solvent content of 40.2% (Matthews, 1968; Kantardjieff & Rupp, 2003). Table 1 summarizes the statistics of data collection.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Triclinic crystals of B. halodurans YhgD. Their approximate dimensions are 0.05 × 0.05 × 0.15 mm.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

X-ray diffraction image from a crystal of B. halodurans YhgD. The crystal-to-detector distance was 200 mm and the wavelength was 0.9793 Å. The black circle is drawn at the resolution of the detector edge (1.90 Å).

Table 1. Data-collection statistics for the B. halodurans YhgD crystal.

Values in parentheses are for the highest resolution shell.

Wavelength (Å) 0.9793
Temperature (K) 100
Oscillation range (°) 1.0
Resolution range (Å) 30.0–1.90 (1.94–1.90)
No. of observations 73734 (5093)
Unique reflections 26074 (1774)
Space group P1
Unit-cell parameters (Å, °) a = 37.22, b = 47.85, c = 54.15, α = 92.75, β = 107.9, γ = 90.27
Data completeness (%) 93.5 (94.8)
Multiplicity 2.8 (2.9)
Average I/σ(I) 13.6 (4.4)
R merge (%) 5.9 (23.5)

R merge = Inline graphic Inline graphic, where I(hkl) is the intensity of reflection hkl, Inline graphic is the sum over all reflections andInline graphic is the sum over i measurements of reflection hkl.

Molecular replacement (MR) was attempted using several YhgD-homologue structures (E. coli RutR, PDB entry 3loc, 27% sequence identity, Y. V. Patskovsky, V. Mennella & S. C. Almo, unpublished work; Pectobacterium atrosepticum Eca1819, PDB entry 2hyt, 26% sequence identity, Joint Center for Structural Genomics, unpublished work; S. aureus QacR, PDB entry 3bqz, 24% sequence identity, B. E. Brooks, K. M. Hardie, M. H. Brown, R. A. Skurray & R. G. Brennan, unpublished work) with the program Phaser (Storoni et al., 2004). We attempted MR searches with both monomeric and dimeric models, without success. To determine the crystal structure, selenomethionine-substituted B. halodurans YhgD has been purified and crystallized. We are presently attempting to collect MAD data.

Acknowledgments

We thank the staff members at Pohang Accelerator Laboratory beamline 7A for their help with data collection. HKY is the recipient of a Global PhD Fellowship program (NRF-2011-0031110). This research was supported by the Agriculture Research Center (ARC; 710003-03-1-SB110) program of the Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Republic of Korea.

References

  1. Battye, T. G. G., Kontogiannis, L., Johnson, O., Powell, H. R. & Leslie, A. G. W. (2011). Acta Cryst. D67, 271–281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  2. De Silva, R. S., Kovacikova, G., Lin, W., Taylor, R. K., Skorupski, K. & Kull, F. J. (2007). J. Bacteriol. 189, 5683–5691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  3. Dover, L. G., Corsino, P. E., Daniels, I. R., Cocklin, S. L., Tatituri, V., Besra, G. S. & Fütterer, K. (2004). J. Mol. Biol. 340, 1095–1105. [DOI] [PubMed]
  4. Evans, P. (2006). Acta Cryst. D62, 72–82. [DOI] [PubMed]
  5. Hinrichs, W., Kisker, C., Düvel, M., Müller, A., Tovar, K., Hillen, W. & Saenger, W. (1994). Science, 264, 418–420. [DOI] [PubMed]
  6. Kantardjieff, K. A. & Rupp, B. (2003). Protein Sci. 12, 1865–1871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  7. Kim, Y., Kim, B. S., Park, Y. J., Choi, W.-C., Hwang, J., Kang, B. S., Oh, T.-K., Choi, S. H. & Kim, M.-H. (2010). J. Biol. Chem. 285, 14020–14030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  8. Leslie, A. G. W. (2006). Acta Cryst. D62, 48–57. [DOI] [PubMed]
  9. Matthews, B. W. (1968). J. Mol. Biol. 33, 491–497. [DOI] [PubMed]
  10. Nguyen Ple, M., Bervoets, I., Maes, D. & Charlier, D. (2010). Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 6286–6300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  11. Potterton, E., Briggs, P., Turkenburg, M. & Dodson, E. (2003). Acta Cryst. D59, 1131–1137. [DOI] [PubMed]
  12. Ramos, J. L., Martínez-Bueno, M., Molina-Henares, A. J., Terán, W., Watanabe, K., Zhang, X., Gallegos, M. T., Brennan, R. & Tobes, R. (2005). Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 69, 326–356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  13. Schumacher, M. A., Miller, M. C., Grkovic, S., Brown, M. H., Skurray, R. A. & Brennan, R. G. (2001). Science, 294, 2158–2163. [DOI] [PubMed]
  14. Schumacher, M. A., Miller, M. C., Grkovic, S., Brown, M. H., Skurray, R. A. & Brennan, R. G. (2002). EMBO J. 21, 1210–1218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  15. Shimada, T., Hirao, K., Kori, A., Yamamoto, K. & Ishihama, A. (2007). Mol. Microbiol. 66, 744–757. [DOI] [PubMed]
  16. Shimada, T., Ishihama, A., Busby, S. J. & Grainger, D. C. (2008). Nucleic Acids Res. 36, 3950–3955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  17. Storoni, L. C., McCoy, A. J. & Read, R. J. (2004). Acta Cryst. D60, 432–438. [DOI] [PubMed]
  18. Takami, H., Nakasone, K., Takaki, Y., Maeno, G., Sasaki, R., Masui, N., Fuji, F., Hirama, C., Nakamura, Y., Ogasawara, N., Kuhara, S. & Horikoshi, K. (2000). Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 4317–4331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  19. Winn, M. D. et al. (2011). Acta Cryst. D67, 235–242.

Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section F: Structural Biology and Crystallization Communications are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES