Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2013 May 23;8(5):e63993. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063993

Transcriptomic Analysis of a Tertiary Relict Plant, Extreme Xerophyte Reaumuria soongorica to Identify Genes Related to Drought Adaptation

Yong Shi 1,#, Xia Yan 2,#, Pengshan Zhao 1, Hengxia Yin 1, Xin Zhao 1, Honglang Xiao 2, Xinrong Li 1,3, Guoxiong Chen 1, Xiao-Fei Ma 1,*
Editor: Zhanjiang Liu4
PMCID: PMC3662755  PMID: 23717523

Abstract

Background

Reaumuria soongorica is an extreme xerophyte shrub widely distributed in the desert regions including sand dune, Gobi and marginal loess of central Asia which plays a crucial role to sustain and restore fragile desert ecosystems. However, due to the lacking of the genomic sequences, studies on R. soongorica had mainly limited in physiological responses to drought stress. Here, a deep transcriptomic sequencing of R. soongorica will facilitate molecular functional studies and pave the path to understand drought adaptation for a desert plant.

Methodology/Principal Findings

A total of 53,193,660 clean paired-end reads was generated from the Illumina HiSeq™ 2000 platform. By assembly with Trinity, we got 173,700 contigs and 77,647 unigenes with mean length of 677 bp and N50 of 1109 bp. Over 55% (43,054) unigenes were successfully annotated based on sequence similarity against public databases as well as Rfam and Pfam database. Local BLAST and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) maps were used to further exhausting seek for candidate genes related to drought adaptation and a set of 123 putative candidate genes were identified. Moreover, all the C4 photosynthesis genes existed and were active in R. soongorica, which has been regarded as a typical C3 plant.

Conclusion/Significance

The assembled unigenes in present work provide abundant genomic information for the functional assignments in an extreme xerophyte R. soongorica, and will help us exploit the genetic basis of how desert plants adapt to drought environment in the near future.

Introduction

Understanding the genetic basis of how organisms adapt to climate change is one of the most challenging tasks [1], [2]. Although many attempts have exploited the adaptation mechanism in the species with known genome sequences, the molecular basis of adaptation in the non-genomic species is still poorly understood [1], [2], especially in the plants from arid regions which contain plenty of potential genetic resources for ecology engineering. As pioneer and constructive species in all kinds of desert ecosystems, Reaumuria plants play important roles to sustain fragile desert ecosystems by keeping the vital process of the transport of energy and substances [3][5], and preventing from wind erosion, sand drifting and the further desertification of these regions [3], [6]–. These plant species were widely used as fine pioneer plants in the restoration of degraded ecosystems with natural rainfall [9] and in the sustainable development of arid regions due to their extreme tolerance to saline-alkaline conditions [10][12].

Reaumuria (Tamaricaceae) plants are perennial xeric shrubs, and all the 12 species classified in this genus were distributed in the arid regions from North Africa, Asia, and South Europe, among which four species including R. soongorica, R. alternifolia, R. kaschgarica, and R. trigyna were found in China (www.eflora.org, Figure 1). R. soongorica (2n = 22 with 778 Mb genome size [13]) is one of the constructive and dominant species in kinds of desert ecosystems in central Asia, such as Taklamakan, Gurbantunggut, Kumtag, Badain Jaran, Qaidam, South Russia, South Mongolia and Tenger deserts, and Mu Us, Ulan Buh and Horqin sandy lands, and marginal Loess [14], [15] (Figure 1). Desertification of these regions is getting worse due to accelerating global climate change and human activity [14], [16]. R. soongorica has undergone desertification of Asia which initiated at least 22 million years ago according to the palaeomagnetic measurements and fossil evidence [17]. During the process of adaptation to desertification, R. soongorica has evolved specific traits including extremely thick cuticle, hollow stomata, specialized leaf shape, deep root system, and effective physiological mechanisms such as reduced transpiration rate, increased water use efficiency, and maintaining the stem vigor to survive desiccation by leaf abscission [7], [18][21]. Much effort has been made in R. soongorica to elucidate the mechanism of drought adaptation during last decade, however, due to paucity of genomic information, most of the previous studies have limited to its physiological characteristics [21][27]. Little work had focused on the genetic diversity based on neutral markers (RAPD [28], ISSR [29], [30] and cpDNA [31]). However, all these studies failed to dissolve the adaptive evolution of R. soongorica. Therefore, transcriptome sequences are in urgent to supply sufficient functional genomic information to address systemically the genetic mechanisms of drought adaptation of R. soongorica.

Figure 1. Distribution of R. soongorica in northern China.

Figure 1

The blue shadow indicates the Reaumuria distribution in China and neighboring districts. The black shadow indicates the Reaumuria distribution in North Africa and Central Asia.

In this study, the R. soongorica transcriptome was sequenced by the Illumina paired-end sequencing technology (Illumina HiSeq™ 2000 platform). A total of 4.8 gigabases raw data was assembled into 173,700 contigs and further constructed into 77,647 unigenes (mean length = 677 bp, N50 = 1109 bp). Moreover, 123 unigenes were identified to be potentially involved in drought adaptation. To our surprise, all the C4 photosynthesis genes were existed and active in R. soongorica which has been regarded as a typical C3 plant [32]. The R. soongorica transcriptomic information provides a prime reference point for the subsequent exploitation of this important genetic resource and will facilitate to unravel the mechanism of adaptation to extreme arid environment.

Results

Sequencing and de novo Assembly

To obtain a global overview of the R. soongorica transcriptome, a pooled cDNA library representing the inflorescences, leaves, and seedlings was constructed, and then sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq™ 2000 platform. A total of 4.8 gigabases dataset was generated from 53,193,660 clean paired-end reads with length of 90 bps and Q20 over 96% (Table 1). This suggested that the sequencing output and quality were good enough for further analysis.

Table 1. Summary of de novo sequence assembly for Reaumuria soongorica.

Item Number
Total Raw Reads 57,745,560
Total Clean Reads 53,193,660
Total Clean Nucleotides (nt) 4,787,429,400
Q20 percentage (%) 96.32
N percentage (%) 0.01
GC percentage (%) 45.52
Number of contigs 173,700
Shortest contig (bp) 100
Longest contig (bp) 7561
N50 of contigs (bp) 532
Mean length of contig (bp) 321
Number of unigenes 77,647
Shortest unigene (bp) 200
Longest unigene (bp) 7546
N50 of unigenes (bp) 1109
Mean length of unigene (bp) 677

A total of 173,700 contigs with average length of 321 bp and an N50 length of 532 bp were assembled by Trinity program [33]. There were 103,541 contigs (59.61%) ranged from 100 to 200 bp, 67,087 contigs (38.62%) ranged from 201 bp to 2000 bp, and 3,072 contigs (1.77%) longer than 2 kb (Figure S1A). After further clustering and assembly, a total of 77,647 unigenes was generated with average length of 677 bp (200 to 7,546 bp) and N50 length of 1109 bp (Figure S1B). About 40% (30,680) unigenes were longer than 500 bp, among which 5.66% (4,392) unigenes were more than 2000 bp.

Sequence Annotation

Several complementary approaches were utilized to validate and annotate the assembled unigenes. The unigenes were first aligned to the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) non-redundant protein (Nr) database, non-redundant nucleotide sequence (Nt) database, and the Swiss-Prot protein database with E-values less than 1e-5. Among the 77,647 unigenes, 41,582 (53.55%), 28,197 (36.31%) and 25,297 (32.58%) unigenes were significantly matched to the known genes in the Nr, Nt and Swiss-Prot protein databases, respectively (Table S1 and Table 2). The E-value distribution of the top hits in the Nr database showed that 46.01% of the sequences were mapped to the known genes in plants with best hits (E-value<1e-50, mean identity is 69.54%), and approximately 16% of unigenes can hit deposited sequences with similarity over 80% (Figure 2A and 2B). About 82% of annotated unigenes can be assigned with a best score to the sequences from the top seven species, i.e., Vitis vinifera (41.65%), Ricinus communis (13.46%), Populus trichocarpa (11.39%), Glycine max (8.12%), Medicago truncatula (3.29%), Arabidopsis thaliana (2.08%) and A. lyrata subsp. lyrata (1.78%) (Figure 2C). Interestingly, the phylogenetic relationship based on the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) also showed R. soongorica in among the other rosids species firstly diverged from V. vinifera, though the bootstrap value of their relationship is below 50% (Figure 2D).

Table 2. Summary of sequence annotation for Reaumuria soongorica.

Database Nr Nt Swiss-Prot GO COG KEGG Rfam Pfam
Hit numbers (percentage) 41582 (53.55%) 28197 (36.31%) 25297 (32.58%) 29666 (38.20%) 14987 (19.30%) 23569 (30.35%) 42 (0.05%) 173 (0.22%)
Annotated numbers (percentage) 42839 (55.17%) 215 (0.28%)
Total annotated numbers(percentage) 43054 (55.45%)

Figure 2. Characteristics of similarity search of unigenes against Nr databases.

Figure 2

(A) The E-value distribution of Nr annotation results. (B) The similarity distribution of Nr annotation results. (C) The species distribution of Nr annotation results. (D) The phylogenetic relationship of Reaumuria soongorica and Nr species. Phylogenetic tree constructed by the Neighbor-Joining method for the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences. Physcomitrella patens was included as an out-group. Neighbor-Joining was consensus tree used 1000 bootstrap replicates. The number represents the percentage of bootstrap values.

GO and COG classification

To identify functional categories among the 77,647 unigenes, all the best BLAST hits were input into the Gene Ontology (GO) Software Blast2GO for GO functional enrichment analysis by performing Fisher’s exact test [34], [35]. In total, 38.21% of unigenes (29,666) could be assigned to gene ontology classes with 202,607 functional terms (Figure 3, Table S2). Interestingly, cellular process (p = 0.007), metabolic process (p = 0.007) and response to stimulus (p = 0.009) are strong significantly overrepresented in the 29 biological process GO groups.

Figure 3. Gene Ontology classification of assembled unigenes.

Figure 3

Total 29,666 unigenes were categorized into three main categories: Biological process (81,460, 40.21%), Cellular component (83,650, 41.29%) and Molecular function (37,497, 18.51%).

For further functional prediction and classification, all of the 77,647 unigenes were aligned to the Clusters of Orthologous Groups of proteins (COG) category. Overall, 19.30% of unigenes (14,987) were assigned into 25 COG categories with 28,537 COG functional terms (Figure 4 and Table S3). The categories including transcription (2,455, 8.60%), carbohydrate transport and metabolism (1,795, 6.29%), signal transduction mechanisms (1,788, 6.27%) and secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism (860, 3.01%) were identified, which might be related to response for drought stress in plants.

Figure 4. COG function classification.

Figure 4

Total 14,987 unigenes were assigned to 25 COG classifications. The largest cluster was for general function prediction only (4,564, 15.99%), followed by transcription (2,455, 8.60%), replication, recombination and repair (2,335, 8.18%), translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis (2,243, 7.86%), posttranslational modification, protein turnover, and chaperones (2,157, 7.56%), carbohydrate transport and metabolism (1,795, 6.29%) and signal transduction mechanisms (1,788, 6.27%).

KEGG pathway mapping

To further gain insights into the biological functions and interactions of our unigenes, a pathway-based analysis was performed in the light of the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) Pathway database which based on the roles in biochemical pathways. There were 23,569 (30.35%) out of the 77,647 unigenes were mapped to 128 KEGG pathways. Among them, 5,056 unigenes (21.45%) were related to metabolic pathways (Ko01100, no maps in KEGG database), 2,460 (10.87%) to biosynthesis of secondary metabolites (Ko01100, no maps in KEGG database). The highest representation with KEGG map was Plant-pathogen interaction (Ko04626, 1,156 unigenes, 4.90%), followed by Plant hormone signal transduction (Ko04075, 1,113 unigenes, 4.72%) and RNA transport (Ko03013, 1,002 unigenes, 4.25%) (Table S4). To be mentioned, 57 core enzymes was detected in the biosynthetic pathway of flavonoid (Ko00941, 228 unigenes) which involved in secondary metabolism under abiotic stresses in plants [36] (Figure S2). Also, all of the core components were found in the circadian rhythm pathway (Ko04712, 192 unigenes), which is crucial for timing of flower and budset in response to the seasonal rhythm of temperature and light length [37], [38] (File S1). R. soongorica has been regarded as a C3 plant based on the photosynthesis characteristics [39], but all the core genes of C4 carbon fixation were found in our transcriptome, surprisingly (Ko00710, 155 unigenes, File S2). Absisic acid (ABA) is a crucial hormone involved in many stress responses [40]. The key enzymes in its biosynthetic and catabolic pathways (Ko00906) and receptor genes (Ko04075) were discovered as well (Table S5 and File S3).

Rfam and Pfam analysis

From Nr, Nt, Swiss-Prot, GO, COG, and KEGG databases, more than half of the unigenes (42,839, 55.17%, mean length was 975 bp, Table 2 and Figure 5A) were annotated, while 34,808 (44.83%) unigenes (mean length was 334 bp, Figure 5A) failed to be annotated. As shown in Figure 5B, the annotated transcripts are significant more abundant in the pool (ANOVA p value = 2.2e-16).

Figure 5. Boxplot distribution of unigenes in annotated and un-annotated unigenes.

Figure 5

(A) Length distribution inferred with log(Length). (B) Expression level inferred by log(RPKM) value. Both show significant in ANOVA tests p = 2.2e-16.

To further exploit the potential function of the un-annotated unigenes, Rfam and Pfam analysis were conducted sequentially. Among the un-annotated unigenes, 1,904 showed significant hits (E-value<0.01, Identity >82.30%) with the deposits in the Rfam database, but only 42 were trustable (E-value<1e-5, Identity >84.47%, BLAST coverage >50%, File S4). Furthermore, 173 out of 34,808 un-annotated unigenes contained 92 kinds of Pfam domains (E-value<1e-5), among which reverse transcriptase (RVT_3) and zinc-binding in reverse transcriptase (zf-RVT) domains were highly represented (26 and 19 times, respectively; File S4).

Functional Genes Related to Drought Adaptation

To screen functional genes related to drought adaptation through three main strategies (drought escape, drought avoidance and drought tolerance; reviewed in [41], [42]), candidate genes from Arabidopsis were local BLASTed against 77,647 unigenes in R. soongorica. A total of 123 unigenes homologous to 113 Arabidopsis candidate genes potentially involved in drought adaptation were identified in our transcriptomic dataset (Table S5). Among them, 46 putative flowering time unigenes were identified to be involved in drought escape (E-value<1e-5) which is a common cost-effective strategy to avoid drought stress in natural populations [41], [42]. A total of 40 unigenes were found to be potentially involved in drought avoidance (E-value<1e-5), which regulate the biogenesis and development of the cuticle (eight unigenes), stomata (six unigenes), and trichomes and root system (26 unigenes). For drought tolerance strategy, the ABA-dependent and -independent pathways have been extensively studied. Totally, 32 unigenes were involved in ABA-dependent pathways, including biosynthetic and catabolic genes, ABA receptors, while eight unigenes were involved in ABA-independent pathway. These genes will be helpful for exploiting the genetic mechanism of how R. soongorica adapts to drought natural environment in northern China.

Discussion

In this study, a large amount of R. soongorica transcriptomic unigenes (77,647) were sequenced with Illumina HiSeq™ 2000 platform (Table 1). The N50 length of unigenes was 1,109 bp and the average length was 677 bp; these results were comparable to the recently published plant trancriptomic analysis, such as Hevea brasiliensis (N50 = 436 bp, average length = 485 bp [43]) and Dendrocalamus latiflorus Munro (N50 = 1,132 bp, average length = 736 bp [44]). Up to date, Trinity is one of most powerful packages prevailed in de novo assembly of short reads, especially in dealing with alternative splicesomes and paralogs [33]. A total of 24,271 (31.26%) unigenes were generated as clusters which might correspond to putative alternative spliced transcripts and/or paralogous transcripts (“CL”-unigene). The number of clusters with only two types of “CL”-unigenes (i.e. CL1.Contig1_A and CL1.Contig2_A) was notably high in our dataset (5,662 clusters, Figure S3). A considerable number of clusters with more than ten types of “CL”-unigenes were also found in our dataset (Figure S3). For example, thirteen “CL2023.Contigs” showed high identities (E-value<1e-41, Identity>78%) with Arabidopsis cryptochrome 1 (CRY1) (Table S5, File S5), which plays a crucial role in sensing seasonal change of blue light and UV-A to initiate flower properly [45], [46]. The thirteen contigs can be divided into three types based on sequence divergence with identities less than 90% (File S5). Together with the overrepresented numbers of the clusters with more than two types of “CL”-unigenes, these results suggest that a large amount of paralogous transcripts were presented in our dataset, indicating at least a whole genomic duplicate might happen in the evolutionary history of R. soongorica. In addition, three alternative splicing sites were found in the alignment of cluster “CL11.contigs” which contained 32 contigs (File S6), showing that splice-isoforms were also produced by the Trinity assembly. Of course, imperfect assembly of short reads by the Trinity cannot be ruled out.

More than half of the unigenes (42,839, 55.17%) were successfully assigned as annotated genes by BLASTing against with public databases Nr, Nt, Swiss-Prot, GO, COG and KEGG, given the absence of genomic information of R. soongorica (Table 2). Notably, the percentage of annotated is the lowest in among the previous studies with the same sequencing strategy during the last year (58.24 to 78.9%, [44], [47], [48]). One possibility of lacking annotation is due to the technical limitation, such as sequencing depth and read length [49], which was common in the all studies with de novo transcriptome analysis [44], [47], [48]. We did find the un-annotated sequences were averagely much shorter than the annotated unigenes (334 bp vs 975 bp, Figure 5A). However, there was still a considerable percentage of unigenes (7.96%, 2,770 of 34,808) with length over 500 bp and reads per kilobase per million reads (RPKM) over three failed to hit any homologs in the known plant species (Figure 5). In addition, there were 173 unigenes contained at least one Pfam domain (E-value<1e-5, File S4), among which two reverse transcriptase domains RVT_3 and zf-RVT were highly represented with 26 and 19 times, respectively. These results suggested that a considerable portion of genes in R. soongorica might originate from novel retrotransposon mechanisms [50], [51], which not found in any known genomes yet, and the high frequency of reverse transcriptase genes could be an indispensable part of R. soongorica genome (778 Mb, 2n = 22 [13]).

So far, V. vinifera was the highest related species with known genome to R. soongorica (Figure 2C), but fewer than half of annotated unigenes in R. soongorica hit protein sequences in V. vinifera (Figure 2C). This is consistent with that these two species were classified into different orders, Caryophyllales (Tamaraceae, Reaumuria) and Vitales (Vitaceae, Vitis) [52], [53], and with their low bootstrap value support in the ITS phylogenetic tree (Figure 2D). Therefore, the vast un-annotated unigenes (44.83%, 34,808 of 77,647) could only be novel genes compared with the known genomes and specific in the genome of the relict Tertiary plant R. soongorica. Functional and expressional studies by Digital Gene Expression analysis and real-time PCR are needed to further corroborate this hypothesis in detail.

After deep sequencing and exhaustive annotation, this endeavor provided a large amount of unigenes that will facilitate to exploit genetic resources in the functional studies and to identify candidate genes responsible for drought adaptation in R. soongorica. Candidate genes out of the 77,647 unigenes in R. soongorica involved in three drought adaptation strategies (drought avoidance, drought escape and drought tolerance; reviewed in [41], [42]) were analyzed (Table S5). At least eight unigenes were possibly involved in the formation of the thick cuticle on R. soongorica leaf surface (8.3 µm [18]), which plays an important role in regulating the exchange of gases and water in plants and can enhance tolerance to drought [54]. To be mentioned, three unigenes were found as homologs of HvABCG31/Eibi1, an ATP-binding cassette subfamily G full transporter (also found in KEGG, ko02010), which is essential for the cutin formation and the preservation leaf water in wild barley [55]. Stomata, trichomes and root hairs are crucial for water usefulness and maintenance under drought environment (reviewed in [54], [56]), and the molecular mechanisms of the differentiation of these tissues have been extensively studied in Arabidopsis [57][59]. FAMA is required for the terminal differentiation of guard cells [60]. Glabra 1 (GL1) is an important regulator of trichome initiation in Arabidopsis [61]. The development of root hairs and trichomes is regulated by GL2, GL3, Enhancer of Glabra 3 (EGL3) and Transparent Testa Glabra 1 (TTG1) with similar molecular mechanisms in Arabidopsis [62]. Here, a set of unigenes potentially involved in the biogenesis and development of these structures were identified (Table S5), which will facilitate to disentangle the formation of the specific traits such as hollow stomata and deep root system [18] and to further understand the molecular mechanism of drought avoidance strategy in desert plants.

Drought stress can promote plants flowering earlier [63][65]. In our field survey, flowering time of R. soongorica obviously varied between the populations along a precipitation gradient. The plants in Haishiwan, Gansu province (annual precipitation 600 mm) were still flowering in November, while the plants in Shashichang, Gansu province (precipitation 180 mm) had finished flowering and started to disperse seeds in September (data not shown). We propose that the genes control flowering time might have undergone strong natural selection in R. soongorica populations from extreme arid regions. Finally, including all the core components in circadian rhythm in plants KEGG pathway (Ko04712, File S1), 29 out of 51 flowering time genes in Arabidopsis can hit their homologous unigenes in R. soongorica (Table S5). Further investigating the correlation between the genetic diversity of these candidate genes and the variation of flowering time along drought gradient could shed light on how R. soongorica adapts to natural arid environment by drought escape strategy.

The molecular response to drought stress has been studied intensively in model plants, and at least two pathways are suggested to be involved into drought tolerance: ABA-dependent and -independent pathways (reviewed in [66], [67]). In this study, most of the key genes related to ABA biosynthesis, catabolic and receptor complex were identified by KEGG annotation and local BLAST (File S3 and Table S5), such as rate-limiting enzyme 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenases (NCED) in the biosynthetic pathway [68], receptor complex components pyrabactin resistance/PYR1-like/regulatory components of ABA receptor (PYR/PYL/RCAR) [69], protein phosphatase 2Cs (PP2Cs) to sensor ABA signal [70], and important kinases and transcription factors (i.e. SNF1-related protein kinase 2s (SnRK2s) [71], ABRE-binding factor/ABA-responsive elements (ABF/AREBs) [72]). All of these key unigenes may function in ABA signal transduction in response to drought stress as in model plants. Furthermore, several transcription factors like Dehydration Responsive Element Binding/C-repeat Binding Factors (DREB/CBFs) which are involved in ABA-independent pathways were identified by local BLASTing (Table S5). These genes will help to uncover the molecular basis of physiological responses to drought stress in R. soongorica.

The C4 pathway has been acknowledged to be more adaptive than the C3 pathway in response to abiotic stresses, such as high temperature, radiation and drought [73], [74]. The C3 and C4 photosynthesis can occur simultaneously in different leaves within the same plant [75], and the transition between the C3 and C4 pathways can also occur in some C3 plants under some conditions (i.e. Eleocharis vivipara [76], Flaveria brownii [77]). Nevertheless, the origin of C4 pathway and the transition between the C3 and C4 pathways remained elusive because of the absence of genetic evidence. R. soongorica is a C3 plant according to its physiological characteristics [32]. In this study, all of the genes encode key enzymes in C4 carbon fixation pathway were presented in the transcriptomic dataset from the annotation of KEGG (File S2). The lengths of the C4 genes were not statistically different with the C3 genes (ANOVA p = 0.83), but the C3 genes were significantly abundant than C4 genes (p = 2.7e-05, Figure 6). This is partially concordant to the previous studies which characterized R. soongorica as a C3 plant [32], [78], [79]. To our knowledge, the present and active of the C4 genes in R. soongorica might be the first transcriptomic evidence to support that a Tamaricaceae plant could also orchestrate the C3 and C4 pathways in response to environmental changes [76], [80], [81].

Figure 6. Boxplot distribution of C3 and C4 unigenes.

Figure 6

(A) Length distribution inferred with log(Length). (B) Expression level inferred by log(RPKM) value.

Conclusion and Perspectives

Desert plants have attracted more and more attentions, because they contain plenty of potential genetic resources to adapt to the extremely harsh conditions in their habitats. In the recent years, transcriptome sequencing became a most powerful and efficient approach to uncover genomic information in non-model organisms [82], [83], few studies (but see [84]) focused on exploitation of the molecular basis of drought adaptation of desert plants. In present study, 77,647 unigenes were generated from a Tertiary relic species R. soongorica with the Illumina HiSeq™ 2000 platform and more than half of unigenes has been annotated. At least 123 candidate genes related to drought adaptation were identified by the KEGG annotation and local BLAST, and population genetic study on these candidate genes will help us to better understand the adaptive evolutionary mechanism of R. soongorica. Expression and function analysis of the un-annotated unigenes will be also employed to unravel the specific drought adaptation mechanism in R. soongorica. These endeavors will advance our knowledge of a dominant plant species coping with the global climate change in the fragile desert ecosystems.

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

R. soongorica is a species widely distributed in Shashichang, Jingtai County, Gansu province and other arid regions, and it is not included into any list of endangered or protected species. Before collecting the samples, an oral permission was got from the local management of forestry after applying with introduction letters of CAREERI (Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences).

Plant Materials

Leaves and inflorescences of R. soongorica (Figure S4A) were collected in wild field, Shashichang, Jingtai County, Gansu province, northwest of China (37°21′41″N,104°8′11″E), where the average annual precipitation is 180 mm from 1950 to 2000 (http://www.worldclim.org/). Tissues were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen for later extraction of total RNA. R. soongorica seeds from the same place were planted on damp filter papers and incubated at 4°C for 4 days before being placed at 23°C under long-day (16 h light/8 h dark) condition with a photosynthetic photon flux density of 150 µmol m−2 s−1. Two weeks after germination, seedlings were harvested for RNA isolation (Figure S4B).

RNA Extraction, Library Preparation and RNA-seq

Total RNA was extracted with E.Z.N.A® Plant RNA Kit (Omega Bio-tek, Doraville, GA, USA). The concentration and quality of each RNA sample were determined by NanoDrop 2000™ micro-volume spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and gel electrophoresis. One sample of total RNA was extracted from mature plant tissues including flowers and leaves. Another sample was from whole seedlings including roots, hypocotyls, and cotyledons. The two RNA samples were pooled equally to construct the cDNA library with a final concentration of 610.4 ng/µl.

The poly (A) mRNA was enriched by magnetic Oligo (dT) beads, and then was interrupted into 200–700 nt fragments. Using these short fragments as templates, the first cDNA strand was synthesized by random hexamers primers, followed by the second-stand cDNA synthesis using DNA polymerase I (New England BioLabs) and RNase H (Invitrogen). The short DNA fragments were purified with a QiaQuick PCR extraction kit (QIAGEN Inc., Valencia, CA, USA) for following end repairing and tailing A. Then the DNA fragments were ligated to sequencing adaptors, and the DNA fragments with required length were purified by agarose gel electrophoresis and gathered by PCR amplification. Finally, a paired-end library with insert sizes of 200–700 bp was sequenced using Illumina HiSeq™ 2000 with the average read length of 90 bp. The raw data are available in the ArrayExpress database, E-MTAB-1543 (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress/experiments/E-MTAB-1543/).

De novo Assembly and Expression Profiling

The clean reads were obtained after filtering adapter sequences, reads with 5% ambiguous sequences ‘N’, and low-quality reads (reads with a base quality less than Q20), with a custom PERL script. Then, Trinity, a package consisting of Inchworm, Chrysalis and Butterfly, was used to perform the de novo assembly of high-quality clean reads [33]. The command-line parameters used were “–seqType fq –min_contig_length 200–CPU 5–bflyHeapSpaceMax 4G –JM 20G”. Short reads with overlapping sequences were firstly assembled by Inchworm to form the longest contigs without gaps. These contigs were pooled to build into de Brujin graphs by Chrysalis. According to the paired end information, Butterfly reconciled the de Bruijn graphs and output longer sequences without overlooking the possibility of splice forms and paralogous transcripts. Such sequences which cannot be extended on either end were defined as unigenes. After clustering, the unigenes were divided into clusters (prefix is “CL”) and singletons (prefix is “Unigene”).

RPKM of each unigene was normalized by ERANGE3.1 software to determine the unigene expression profiles [85].

Functional Annotation

All sequences were annotated by aligning with public protein and nucleotide databases, such as the NCBI Nr, Nt database, the Swiss-Prot protein database, the KEGG database, and the COG with an E-value cutoff of 1e-5. Based on the alignment results, the further annotation analysis with GO terms, which described biological processes, molecular functions and cellular components, was performed by Blast2GO software [35], [86]. The distribution of the gene functions was plotted by WEGO [87].

Then non-coding RNA was retrieved from the Rfam database (http://rfam.sanger.ac.uk/). The sequences excluded non-conding RNAs were BLASTed against Pfam-A database (http://pfam.sanger.ac.uk/) for further seeking functional domains using a hidden Markov model (HMM) algorithm (version 26.0) [88].

Identification of Putative Candidate Genes Involved in Drought Adaptation

Generally, plants take three main strategies (drought escape, drought avoidance and drought tolerance) to adapt to drought conditions (reviewed in [41], [42]). To uncover the potential candidate genes related to the three strategies in R. soongorica, genes in model plant Arabidopsis involved in flowering time (drought escape), epidermal development such as stomata, cuticle waxes, trichomes and root hairs (drought avoidance), and ABA and drought stress signals (drought tolerance), were selected to screen the potential orthologs from the unigene dataset by Local BLASTN with E-value cutoff of 1e-5 (ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/executables/LATEST-BLAST/).

Supporting Information

Figure S1

Length distributions of contigs and unigenes. (A) Summary distribution of the lengths of the 173,700 assembled contigs (>100 bp, mean length = 321 bp, N50 = 532 bp). (B) Summary distribution of the lengths of the 77,647 assembled unigenes (>200 bp, mean length = 677 bp, N50 = 1109 bp).

(TIFF)

Figure S2

The flavonoid pathway from KEGG annotation.

(TIF)

Figure S3

The distribution of “CL”-unigenes for Reaumuria soongorica. The x-axis represents the number of contigs a “CL”-unigene composed.

(TIF)

Figure S4

The picture of Reaumuria soongorica. (A) Adult R. soongorica. (B) Two-week old seedlings of R. soongorica.

(TIF)

Table S1

List of unigenes with significant BLASTN matches against Nr, Nt, Swiss-Prot and KEGG databases.

(XLSX)

Table S2

The summary of GO annotation for Reaumuria soongorica.

(XLSX)

Table S3

The summary of COG annotation for Reaumuria soongorica.

(XLSX)

Table S4

The summary of KEGG annotation for Reaumuria soongorica.

(XLSX)

Table S5

List of candidate genes involved in drought escape, drought avoidance and drought tolerance in Reaumuria soongorica (Unigenes appears multiple times were counted once in article).

(XLSX)

File S1

The unigenes involved in circadian rhythm of Reaumuria soongorica from KEGG annotation.

(RAR)

File S2

The unigenes involved in carbon fixation in photosynthetic organisms of Reaumurica soongorica from KEGG annotation.

(RAR)

File S3

The unigenes involved in ABA biosynthetic and catabolic pathways and ABA receptors in Reaumuria soongorica from KEGG annotaton.

(RAR)

File S4

The Rfam and Pfam annotations of Reaumuria soongorica unigenes.

(RAR)

File S5

Multiple sequence alignment of AtCRY1 and CL2023.Contigs by CLUSTALW.

(RAR)

File S6

Multiple sequence alignment of CL11.Contigs by CLUSTALW.

(RAR)

Acknowledgments

We thank the technical support for Illumina sequencing and initial data analysis from Beijing Genome Institute at Shenzhen, P. R. China, and appreciate the constructive and helpful suggestions from Xiao-Ru Wang and two anonymous reviewers.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by Key Project of Chinese National Programs for Fundamental Research and Development (973 Program, 2013CB4229906), by Grant 29Y127E71 from the “One Hundred Talents” Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, and by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 91125025). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1. Manel S, Joost S, Epperson BK, Holderegger R, Storfer A, et al. (2010) Perspectives on the use of landscape genetics to detect genetic adaptive variation in the field. Mol Ecol 19: 3760–3772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Stapley J, Reger J, Feulner PGD, Smadja C, Galindo J, et al. (2010) Adaptation genomics: the next generation. Trends Ecol Evol 25: 705–712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Liu JL, Li FR, Liu CA, Liu QJ (2012) Influences of shrub vegetation on distribution and diversity of a ground beetle community in a Gobi desert ecosystem. Biodivers Conserv 21: 2601–2619. [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Li XR, Zhang P, Su YG, Jia RL (2012) Carbon fixation by biological soil crusts following revegetation of sand dunes in arid desert regions of China: A four-year field study. CATENA 97: 119–126. [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Saul-Tcherkas V, Steinberger Y (2011) Soil microbial diversity in the vicinity of a Negev Desert shrub-Reaumuria negevensis . Microb Ecol 61: 64–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Slemnev NN, Gunin PD, Kazantseva TI (1994) On the problem of natural restitution of dominant plants in the ecosystems of the desert zone of Mongolia. Rastit Resur 30: 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Liu YB, Zhang TG, Li XR, Wang G (2007) Protective mechanism of desiccation tolerance in Reaumuria soongorica: Leaf abscission and sucrose accumulation in the stem. Sci China Ser C Life Sci 50: 15–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Xu L, Wang L, Yue M, Zhao GF, Wang YL (2003) Analysis of grey relatedness between the modular sturcture of Reaumuria soongorica population in the desert of Fukang,Xinjiang and the environmental factors. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica 27: 742–748. [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Bai YF, Wu JG, Xing Q, Pan QM, Huang JH, et al. (2008) Primary production and rain use efficiency across a precipitation gradient on the Mongolia plateau. Ecology 89: 2140–2153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Zhou Y, Pei ZQ, Su JQ, Zhang JL, Zheng YR, et al. (2012) Comparing soil organic carbon dynamics in perennial grasses and shrubs in a saline-alkaline arid region, northwestern China. PLoS One 7: e42927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Ramadan T (1998) Ecophysiology of salt excretion in the xero-halophyte Reaumuria hirtella . New Phytol 139: 273–281. [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Gorai M, Neffati M (2007) Germination responses of Reaumuria vermiculata to salinity and temperature. Ann Appl Biol 151: 53–59. [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Wang XH, Zhang T, Wen ZN, Xiao HL, Yang ZJ, et al. (2011) The chromosome number, karyotype and genome size of the desert plant diploid Reaumuria soongorica (Pall.) Maxim. Plant Cell Rep 30: 955–964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Yang XP, Rost KT, Lehmkuhl F, Zhu ZD, Dodson J (2004) The evolution of dry lands in northern China and in the Republic of Mongolia since the Last Glacial Maximum. Quaternary Int 118–119: 69–85. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhu ZD, Wu Z, Liu S, Di X (1980) An outline of Chinese deserts. Beijing: Science Press.
  • 16. Yang XP, Scuderi L, Paillou P, Liu ZT, Li HW, et al. (2011) Quaternary environmental changes in the drylands of China - A critical review. Quaternary Sci Rev 30: 3219–3233. [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Guo ZT, Ruddiman WF, Hao QZ, Wu HB, Qiao YS, et al. (2002) Onset of Asian desertification by 22 Myr ago inferred from loess deposits in China. Nature 416: 159–163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Liu JQ, Qiu MX, Pu JC, Lu ZM (1982) The typical extreme xerophyte-Reaumuria soongorica in the desert of China. Act bot sinica 24: 485–488. [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Chong PF, Li Y, Su SP, Gao M, Qiu ZJ (2010) Photosynthetic characteristics and their effect factors of Reaumuria soongorica on three geographical populations. Acta Ecol Sin 30: 914–922. [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Finkelstein R, Gampala SS, Lynch TJ, Thomas TL, Rock CD (2005) Redundant and distinct functions of the ABA response loci ABA-insensitive(ABI)5 and ABRE-binding factor(ABF)3. Plant Mol Biol 59: 253–267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Bai J, Gong CM, Chen K, Kang HM, Wang G (2009) Examination of antioxidative system’s responses in the different phases of drought stress and during recovery in desert plant Reaumuria soongorica (Pall.) Maxim. J Plant Biol 52: 417–425. [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Bai J, Gong CM, Wang G, Kang HM (2010) Antioxidative characteristics of Reaumuria soongorica under drought stress. Acta Bot Boreali-Occident Sin 30: 2444–2450. [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Bai J, Xu DH, Kang HM, Chen K, Wang G (2008) Photoprotective function of photorespiration in Reaumuria soongorica during different levels of drought stress in natural high irradiance. Photosynthetica 46: 232–237. [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Chong PF, Su SP, Li Y (2011) Comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance of Reaumuria soongorica from four geographical populations. Acta Prataculturae Sinica 20: 26–33. [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Lv MT, Yang JY, Yang M, Zhang ZR, Ma X (2010) Effect of different drought stress conditions on germination of Reaumuria soongorica seeds. Chinese Journal of Grassland 32: 58–63. [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Yan QD, Su PX, Gao S (2012) Response of photosynthetic characteristics of C3 desert plant Reaumuria soongorica and C4 desert plant Salsola passerina to different drought degrees. Journal of Desert Research 32: 364–371. [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Zeng YJ, Wang YR, Zhuang GH, Yang ZS (2004) Seed germination responses of Reaumuria soongorica and Zygophyllum xanthoxylum to drought stress and sowing depth. Acta Ecol Sin 24: 1629–1634. [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Xu L, Wang YL, Wang XM, Zhang LJ, Yue M, et al. (2003) Genetic structure of Reaumuria soongorica population in Fukang Desert, Xinjiang and its relationship with ecological factors. Acta Bot Sin 45: 787–794. [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Li XL, Chen J, Wang G (2008) Spatial autocorrelation analysis of ISSR genetic variation of Reaumuria soongorica population in northwest of China. Journal of Desert Research 28: 468–472. [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Qian ZQ, Xu L, Wang YL, Yang J, Zhao GF (2008) Ecological genetics of Reaumuria soongorica (Pall.) Maxim. population in the oasis-desert ecotone in Fukang, Xinjiang, and its implications for molecular evolution. Biochem Syst Ecol 36: 593–601. [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Li ZH, Chen J, Zhao GF, Guo YP, Kou YX, et al. (2012) Response of a desert shrub to past geological and climatic change: A phylogeographic study of Reaumuria soongarica (Tamaricaceae) in western China. J Syst Evol 50: 351–361. [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Ma JY, Chen T, Qiang WY, Wang G (2005) Correlations between foliar stable carbon isotope composition and environmental factors in desert plant Reaumuria soongorica (Pall.) Maxim. J Integr Plant Biol 47: 1065–1073. [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Grabherr MG, Haas BJ, Yassour M, Levin JZ, Thompson DA, et al. (2011) Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat Biotechnol 29: 644–652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, et al. (2000) Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet 25: 25–29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Conesa A, Gotz S, Garcia-Gomez JM, Terol J, Talon M, et al. (2005) Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics 21: 3674–3676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Winkel-Shirley B (2002) Biosynthesis of flavonoids and effects of stress. Curr Opin Plant Biol 5: 218–223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Mouradov A, Cremer F, Coupland G (2002) Control of flowering time interacting pathways as a basis for diversity. The Plant Cell Online 14: S111–S130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Böhlenius H, Huang T, Charbonnel-Campaa L, Brunner AM, Jansson S, et al. (2006) CO/FT regulatory module controls timing of flowering and seasonal growth cessation in trees. Science 312: 1040–1043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Xu DH, Su PX, Zhang RY, Li HL, Zhao L, et al. (2010) Photosynthetic parameters and carbon reserves of a resurrection plant Reaumuria soongorica during dehydration and rehydration. Plant Growth Regul 60: 183–190. [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Leung J, Giraudat J (1998) Abscisic acid signal transduction. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 49: 199–222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Chaves MM, Maroco JP, Pereira JS (2003) Understanding plant responses to drought - from genes to the whole plant. Funct Plant Biol 30: 239–264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Mckay JK, Richards J, Mitchell-Olds T (2003) Genetics of drought adaptation in Arabidopsis thaliana: I. Pleiotropy contributes to genetic correlations among ecological traits. Mol Ecol 12: 1137–1151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Xia ZH, Xu HM, Zhai JL, Li DJ, Luo HL, et al. (2011) RNA-Seq analysis and de novo transcriptome assembly of Hevea brasiliensis . Plant Mol Biol 77: 299–308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Liu MY, Qiao GR, Jiang J, Yang H, Xie LH, et al. (2012) Transcriptome sequencing and de novo analysis for Ma Bamboo (Dendrocalamus latiflorus Munro) using the Illumina platform. PLoS One 7: e46766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. El-Assal SED, Alonso-Blanco C, Peeters AJM, Raz V, Koornneef M (2001) A QTL for flowering time in Arabidopsis reveals a novel allele of CRY2. Nat Genet 29: 435–440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Mas P, Devlin PF, Panda S, Kay SA (2000) Functional interaction of phytochrome B and cryptochrome 2. Nature 408: 207–211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Huang LL, Yang X, Sun P, Tong W, Hu SQ (2012) The first Illumina-based de novo transcriptome sequencing and analysis of Safflower Flowers. PLoS One 7: e38653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Xu DL, Long H, Liang JJ, Zhang J, Chen X, et al. (2012) De novo assembly and characterization of the root transcriptome of Aegilops variabilis during an interaction with the cereal cyst nematode. BMC Genomics 13: 133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Novaes E, Drost DR, Farmerie WG, Pappas GJ Jr, Grattapaglia D, et al. (2008) High-throughput gene and SNP discovery in Eucalyptus grandis, an uncharacterized genome. BMC Genomics 9: 312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Flavell AJ (1995) Retroelements, reverse transcriptase and evolution. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 110: 3–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Xiong Y, Eickbush TH (1990) Origin and evolution of retroelements based upon their reverse-transcriptase sequences. EMBO J 9: 3353–3362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Chase MW, Mort ME, Albach DC, et al. (2000) Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences. Bot J Linn Soc 133: 381–461. [Google Scholar]
  • 53. The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (2003) An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Bot J Linn Soc 141: 399–436. [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Yang J, Isabel Ordiz M, Jaworski JG, Beachy RN (2011) Induced accumulation of cuticular waxes enhances drought tolerance in Arabidopsis by changes in development of stomata. Plant Physiol Biochem 49: 1448–1455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Chen GX, Komatsuda T, Ma JF, Nawrath C, Pourkheirandish M, et al. (2011) An ATP-binding cassette subfamily G full transporter is essential for the retention of leaf water in both wild barley and rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 12354–12359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Ishida T, Kurata T, Okada K, Wada T (2008) A genetic regulatory network in the development of trichomes and root hairs. Annu Rev Plant Biol 59: 365–386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Pillitteri LJ, Sloan DB, Bogenschutz NL, Torii KU (2006) Termination of asymmetric cell division and differentiation of stomata. Nature 445: 501–505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Schellmann S, Hulskamp M (2005) Epidermal differentiation: trichomes in Arabidopsis as a model system. Int J Dev Biol 49: 579–584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Bruex A, Kainkaryam RM, Wieckowski Y, Kang YH, Bernhardt C, et al. (2012) A gene regulatory network for root epidermis cell differentiation in Arabidopsis . PLoS Genet 8: e1002446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Ohashi-Ito K, Bergmann DC (2006) Arabidopsis FAMA controls the final proliferation/differentiation switch during stomatal development. Plant Cell 18: 2493–2505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Schnittger A, Jurgens G, Hulskamp M (1998) Tissue layer and organ specificity of trichome formation are regulated by GLABRA1 and TRIPTYCHON in Arabidopsis . Development 125: 2283–2289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Tominaga-Wada R, Ishida T, Wada T (2011) New Insights into the Mechanism of Development of Arabidopsis Root Hairs and Trichomes. Int Rev Cel Mol Bio 286: 67–106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Fox GA (1990) Drought and the evolution of flowering time in desert annuals. Am J Bot 77: 1508–1518. [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Franks SJ, Sim S, Weis AE (2007) Rapid evolution of flowering time by an annual plant in response to a climate fluctuation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 1278–1282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Nevo E, Fu YB, Pavlicek T, Khalifa S, Tavasi M, et al. (2012) Evolution of wild cereals during 28 years of global warming in Israel. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 3412–3415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2007) Gene networks involved in drought stress response and tolerance. J Exp Bot 58: 221–227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Xiong LM, Schumaker KS, Zhu JK (2002) Cell signaling during cold, drought, and salt stress. Plant Cell 14: S165–S183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Nambara E, Marion-Poll A (2005) Abscisic acid biosynthesis and catabolism. Annu Rev Plant Biol 56: 165–185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Gonzalez-Guzman M, Pizzio GA, Antoni R, Vera-Sirera F, Merilo E, et al. (2012) Arabidopsis PYR/PYL/RCAR receptors play a major role in Quantitative regulation of stomatal aperture and transcriptional response to abscisic acid. The Plant Cell Online 24: 2483–2496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Ma Y, Szostkiewicz I, Korte A, Moes D, Yang Y, et al. (2009) Regulators of PP2C phosphatase activity function as abscisic acid sensors. Science 324: 1064–1068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Fujita Y, Nakashima K, Yoshida T, Katagiri T, Kidokoro S, et al. (2009) Three SnRK2 protein kinases are the main positive regulators of abscisic acid signaling in response to water stress in Arabidopsis . Plant Cell Physiol 50: 2123–2132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Kim SY (2006) The role of ABF family bZIP class transcription factors in stress response. Physiol Plant 126: 519–527. [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Taiz L, Zeiger E (1991) Plant Physiology. Redwood City: The Benjamin/Cammings Publishing Company, Inc.
  • 74.Raven PH, Evert RF, Eichhorn SE (1992) Biology of Plants. New York: Worth Publishers, Inc.
  • 75. Raghavendra AS, Rajendrudu G, Das VSR (1978) Simultaneous occurrence of C3 and C4 photosyntheses in relation to leaf position in Mollugo nudicaulis . Nature 273: 143–144. [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Ueno O (1998) Induction of Kranz anatomy and C4-like biochemical characteristics in a submerged amphibious plant by abscisic acid. Plant Cell 10: 571–583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Cheng SH, Demoore B, Wu JR, Edwards GE, Ku MSB (1989) Photosynthetic plasticity in Flaveria Brownii growth irradiance and the expression of C4 photosynthesis. Plant Physiol 89: 1129–1135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Sage RF, Christin PA, Edwards EJ (2011) The C4 plant lineages of planet Earth. J Exp Bot 62: 3155–3169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Sage RF, Sage TL, Kocacinar F (2012) Photorespiration and the evolution of C4 photosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Biol 63: 17.11–17.29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Brautigam A, Kajala K, Wullenweber J, Sommer M, Gagneul D, et al. (2011) An mRNA blueprint for C4 photosynthesis derived from comparative transcriptomics of closely related C3 and C4 species. Plant Physiol 155: 142–156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Williams BP, Aubry S, Hibberd JM (2012) Molecular evolution of genes recruited into C4 photosynthesis. Trends Plant Sci 17: 213–220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Wang Z, Gerstein M, Snyder M (2009) RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat Rev Genet 10: 57–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Ekblom R, Galindo J (2011) Applications of next generation sequencing in molecular ecology of non-model organisms. Heredity (Edinb) 107: 1–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Zhou YD, Gao FD, Liu RM, Feng JD, Li HD (2012) De novo sequencing and analysis of root transcriptome using 454 pyrosequencing to discover putative genes associated with drought tolerance in Ammopiptanthus mongolicus . BMC Genomics 13: 266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Mortazavi A, Williams BA, Mccue K, Schaeffer L, Wold B (2008) Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq. Nature Methods 5: 621–628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Conesa A, Gotz S (2008) Blast2GO: A comprehensive suite for functional analysis in plant genomics. Int J Plant Genomics 2008: 619832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Ye J, Fang L, Zheng H, Zhang Y, Chen J, et al. (2006) WEGO: a web tool for plotting GO annotations. Nucleic Acids Res 34: W293–W297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Punta M, Coggill PC, Eberhardt RY, Mistry J, Tate J, et al. (2012) The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 40: D290–D301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1

Length distributions of contigs and unigenes. (A) Summary distribution of the lengths of the 173,700 assembled contigs (>100 bp, mean length = 321 bp, N50 = 532 bp). (B) Summary distribution of the lengths of the 77,647 assembled unigenes (>200 bp, mean length = 677 bp, N50 = 1109 bp).

(TIFF)

Figure S2

The flavonoid pathway from KEGG annotation.

(TIF)

Figure S3

The distribution of “CL”-unigenes for Reaumuria soongorica. The x-axis represents the number of contigs a “CL”-unigene composed.

(TIF)

Figure S4

The picture of Reaumuria soongorica. (A) Adult R. soongorica. (B) Two-week old seedlings of R. soongorica.

(TIF)

Table S1

List of unigenes with significant BLASTN matches against Nr, Nt, Swiss-Prot and KEGG databases.

(XLSX)

Table S2

The summary of GO annotation for Reaumuria soongorica.

(XLSX)

Table S3

The summary of COG annotation for Reaumuria soongorica.

(XLSX)

Table S4

The summary of KEGG annotation for Reaumuria soongorica.

(XLSX)

Table S5

List of candidate genes involved in drought escape, drought avoidance and drought tolerance in Reaumuria soongorica (Unigenes appears multiple times were counted once in article).

(XLSX)

File S1

The unigenes involved in circadian rhythm of Reaumuria soongorica from KEGG annotation.

(RAR)

File S2

The unigenes involved in carbon fixation in photosynthetic organisms of Reaumurica soongorica from KEGG annotation.

(RAR)

File S3

The unigenes involved in ABA biosynthetic and catabolic pathways and ABA receptors in Reaumuria soongorica from KEGG annotaton.

(RAR)

File S4

The Rfam and Pfam annotations of Reaumuria soongorica unigenes.

(RAR)

File S5

Multiple sequence alignment of AtCRY1 and CL2023.Contigs by CLUSTALW.

(RAR)

File S6

Multiple sequence alignment of CL11.Contigs by CLUSTALW.

(RAR)


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES