Skip to main content
Clinical Neuropathology logoLink to Clinical Neuropathology
. 2013 Feb 28;32(2):82–83. doi: 10.5414/NP300622

Clinical Neuropathology Practice News 2-2013: immunohistochemistry pins IDH in glioma – molecular testing procedures under scrutiny

Matthias Preusser 1, Martin van den Bent 2
PMCID: PMC3663465  PMID: 23442355

Abstract

Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) gene mutations occur in ~ 60 – 90% of diffuse and anaplastic gliomas and secondary glioblastomas. IDH status is strongly associated with patient survival times and IDH testing is relevant for clinical patient management and for stratification in clinical trials. A recent interlaboratory ring trial shows that immunohistochemistry is a highly reliable method to detect the most common IDH mutation (R132H), while IDH gene sequencing is less robust. These results support initial immunohistochemistry and subsequent gene sequencing in cases with negative or inconclusive immunostaining result as valid algorithm for IDH testing. Furthermore, they highlight the need for strict quality control of DNA-based biomarker analyses on formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tumor samples.

Keywords: isocitrate dehydrogenase, glioma, immunohistochemistry, sequencing

IDH testing under scrutiny

Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) gene mutations are found in 60 – 90% of diffuse and anaplastic gliomas and secondary glioblastomas [1, 2]. IDH testing supports neuropathological differential diagnosis, e.g., for differentiation of oligodendrogliomas from other tumors with clear cell appearance or of glioma from reactive gliosis [3, 4]. Furthermore, IDH mutations confer a favorable survival prognosis and appear relevant as stratification factor in clinical trials on glioma [5]. Assessment of the IDH status may be performed by DNA-based methods or by immunohistochemical detection of the mutated protein [6, 7, 8]. A recent study assessed the reliability of these IDH test methods on routine formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tumor tissue samples in an interlaboratory ring trial involving 6 international neuropathology laboratories [9]. Immunohistochemistry was found to be highly reproducible despite the fact that the staining protocols varied between the laboratories. In contrast, IDH sequencing procedures yielded discordant results in 2 of 6 laboratories. These results support a previously proposed algorithm for IDH testing based on initial anti-IDH1-R132H immunohistochemistry and subsequent gene sequencing in cases with negative or inconclusive immunostaining results [7]. Importantly, gene sequencing procedures need to be strictly quality controlled.

References

  • 1.Parsons DW Jones S Zhang X Lin JC Leary RJ Angenendt P Mankoo P Carter H Siu IM Gallia GL Olivi A McLendon R Rasheed BA Keir S Nikolskaya T Nikolsky Y Busam DA Tekleab H Diaz LA Hartigan J An integrated genomic analysis of human glioblastoma multiforme. Science. 2008; 321: 1807–1812 CrossRef [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Yan H Parsons DW Jin G McLendon R Rasheed BA Yuan W Kos I Batinic-Haberle I Jones S Riggins GJ Friedman H Friedman A Reardon D Herndon J Kinzler KW Velculescu VE Vogelstein B Bigner DD IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in gliomas. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360: 765–773 CrossRef [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Capper D Reuss D Schittenhelm J Hartmann C Bremer J Sahm F Harter PN Jeibmann A von Deimling A Mutation-specific IDH1 antibody differentiates oligodendrogliomas and oligoastrocytomas from other brain tumors with oligodendroglioma-like morphology. Acta Neuropathol. 2011; 121: 241–252 CrossRef [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Capper D Sahm F Hartmann C Meyermann R von Deimling A Schittenhelm J. Application of mutant IDH1 antibody to differentiate diffuse glioma from nonneoplastic central nervous system lesions and therapy-induced changes. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010; 34: 1199-1204 2010; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sanson M Marie Y Paris S Idbaih A Laffaire J Ducray F El Hallani S Boisselier B Mokhtari K Hoang-Xuan K Delattre JY Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 codon 132 mutation is an important prognostic biomarker in gliomas. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27: 4150–4154 CrossRef [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Capper D Zentgraf H Balss J Hartmann C von Deimling A Monoclonal antibody specific for IDH1 R132H mutation. Acta Neuropathol. 2009; 118: 599–601 CrossRef [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Preusser M Capper D Hartmann C IDH testing in diagnostic neuropathology: review and practical guideline article invited by the Euro-CNS research committee. Clin Neuropathol. 2011; 30: 217–230 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Preusser M Wöhrer A Stary S Höftberger R Streubel B Hainfellner JA Value and limitations of immunohistochemistry and gene sequencing for detection of the IDH1-R132H mutation in diffuse glioma biopsy specimens. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2011; 70: 715–723 CrossRef [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.van den Bent MJ Hartmann C Preusser M Ströbel T Dubbink HJ Kros JM von Deimling A Boisselier B Sanson M Halling KC Diefes KL Aldape K Giannini C Interlaboratory comparison of IDH mutation detection. J Neurooncol. 2013; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Neuropathology are provided here courtesy of Dustri-Verlag

RESOURCES