Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Med Genet A. 2013 May 1;161(6):1339–1344. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.35925

Monoamniotic Monochorionic Twins Discordant for Noncompaction Cardiomyopathy

Dianna Ng 1, Yosr Bouhlal 2, Philip C Ursell 1, Joseph TC Shieh 2,3
PMCID: PMC3664136  NIHMSID: NIHMS447311  PMID: 23636980

Abstract

Occasionally “identical twins” are phenotypically different, raising the question of zygosity and the issue of genetic versus environmental influences during development. We recently noted monochorionic-monoamniotic twins, one of which had an isolated cardiac abnormality, noncompaction cardiomyopathy, a condition characterized by cardiac ventricular hypertrabeculation. We examined the prenatal course and subsequent pathologic correlation since ventricular morphogenesis may depend on early muscular contraction and blood flow. The monochorionic-monoamniotic female twin pair was initially identified since one fetus presented with increased nuchal translucency. Complete heart block was later identified in the fetus with nuchal translucency who did not survive after delivery. In contrast, the unaffected twin had normal cardiac studies both prenatally and postnatally. Pathologic analysis of the affected twin demonstrated noncompaction of the left ventricle with dysplasia of the aortic and pulmonary valves. Dissection of the cardiac conduction system disclosed atrioventricular bundle fibrosis. Maternal lupus studies, amniocentesis with karyotype, and studies for 22q11.2 were normal. To test for zygosity, we performed multiple STR marker analysis and found that all markers were shared even using non-blood tissues from the affected twin. These studies demonstrate that monozygotic twins that are monochorionic monoamniotic can be discordant for cardiac noncompaction. The results suggest further investigation into the potential roles of pathologic fibrosis, contractility, and blood flow in cardiac ventricle development.

Keywords: Twins, noncompaction, heritability, cardiomyopathy, congenital heart, monozygotic, fibrosis

INTRODUCTION

It is common for monozygous twins to have identical phenotypes, yet some twins have significant discordant features [Chambers et al., 2006; Hall, 2003; Zwijnenburg et al., 2010]. Increasingly, fetal imaging detects a malformation in only one twin [Harper et al., 2012; Jo et al., 2011; Ramsey et al., 2012]. In such instances, the question of true zygosity of the twins is sometimes reexamined. Yet, in conjoined twins, indisputably monozygotic, a complex heart malformation in only one twin may rarely be present [Ursell et al., 1983] supporting that these monozygous twins are not always “identical.” Discordance in pathophysiologic phenotypes in monozygous twins may also be recognizable by fetal ultrasound. Thus, the colloquial expression “identical twins” is most accurate when referring to genotypic similarity.

In this report we describe monochorionic monoamniotic twins with a discordant cardiac phenotype in which one twin had no physiologic or structural heart abnormality, and the other had noncompaction cardiomyopathy. Unlike hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, for which concordance among monozygous twins has been used as a tool for defining a heritable cause [Ko et al., 1992; Maron et al., 2007; Palka et al., 2003; Reid et al., 1989], noncompaction cardiomyopathy has no clear-cut etiology and may represent a nonspecific phenotype, if not properly defined. Noncompaction cardiomyopathy is characterized by prominent, excessive ventricular trabeculations with deep intertrabecular recesses and poorly developed left ventricular papillary muscles [Burke et al., 2005; Chin et al., 1990; Maron et al., 2006; Sarma et al., 2010]. Considered to reflect a developmental abnormality of the heart, the same pathology may be seen in association with congenital cardiac malformations and is termed ventricular noncompaction. The clinical sequelae of noncompaction cardiomyopathy are variable but may include arrhythmias, thromboembolism, heart failure, and sudden cardiac death [Bhatia et al., 2011; Freedom et al., 2005]. There is evidence of genetic involvement in some cases: X-linked and autosomal dominant inheritance have been observed in familial cases, and certain genetic syndromes have been associated with noncompaction including Barth syndrome [Bleyl et al., 1997; Ichida et al., 2001], Coffin-Lowry syndrome [Martinez et al., 2011], Turner syndrome [Altenberger et al., 2009; van Heerde et al., 2003], and 1p36 deletion [Battaglia et al., 2008; Thienpont et al., 2007]. Alterations in sarcomeric genes, such as Beta-myosin heavy chain (MYH7) and cardiac myosin-binding protein C (MYBPC3), have also been documented in some familial cases [Budde et al., 2007; Probst et al., 2011]. Only in a minority of cases of noncompaction cardiomyopathy is the etiology known, making a report of discordant monozygotic twins particularly relevant. Studies of noncompaction cardiomyopathy in twins have been limited, although these may help in determining genetic and environmental contributions. In our case described below, we report discordance for noncompaction cardiomyopathy, despite proven monozygosity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Informed consent and DNA was obtained using protocols approved by the Committee on Human Subjects Research at the University of California San Francisco.

Genomic DNA isolation was performed using formalin-fixed tissues from the autopsy or from blood in the living twin using Puregene Blood Kit (Qiagen) with minor modifications. Briefly, fixed tissues were minced prior to incubation with cell lysis, followed by protein precipitation and DNA precipitation. Isolation from liver yielded 644ng genomic DNA/mg tissue. DNA samples were verified on agarose 2% gels and quantified using the Nanodrop1000 Spectrophotometer. For more accurate quantification and quality assessment, DNA samples were analyzed using the DNA1000 chips run on the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. Zygosity of the twins was examined by genotyping highly polymorphic DNA loci using the PowerPlex short tandem repeat kit (Promega). Amplified fragments were detected using the ABI 3730xl DNA Analyzer. Data were analyzed with GeneMapper software.

CLINICAL REPORT

A 21-year-old G2P1 healthy woman was found to have monochorionic monoamnionic female twins (twins A and B) by ultrasound. There was no family history of congenital heart disease, cardiomyopathy, ventricular noncompaction, unexplained deaths, vascular conditions including thrombosis, recurrent pregnancy losses or autoimmune disorders. Imaging at 14 weeks pregnancy disclosed fetal bradycardia (<60 beats/minute) and cystic hygroma in twin B, while twin A was normal. Fetal echocardiography at 18-4/7 weeks gestation showed a ventricular heart rate of 57 beats/minute with an atrial rate that was twice as fast, indicative of complete heart block in twin B. Other findings in twin B included aortic valve stenosis, post-stenotic aortic dilation, and left ventricular thickening. Twin A had a heart rate of 149 beats/minute and normal anatomy. At 22-5/7 weeks, the ascending aorta measured 0.73 cm (Z-score = +4.77) while the aortic valve measured 0.23 cm (Z-score −3.08).

Amniocentesis showed a normal karyotype of 46,XX. FISH for chromosomes 13, 18, and 21 as well as for 22q11.2 was normal; and maternal lupus antibodies were not detected. Due to signs of fetal distress, the twins were delivered by cesarean section at 27 weeks. Twin A was born with Apgar scores 5 and 7, while twin B had bradycardia and expired shortly after delivery. A neonatal echocardiogram of female twin A was normal. Six months after birth, twin A was developing well with no evidence of health problems or cardiac anomalies. The parents were healthy and did not undergo echocardiography.

Pathology

The family consented to autopsy of twin B. This female twin weighed 730 gram (10–25%ile) and had an enlarged heart (12 gm, expected mean 5.8 ± 1.9) with normal atrial situs. There was aortic and pulmonic valve annular narrowing, both valves having three dysplastic leaflets. The left ventricular cavity was dilated and the muscular walls hypertrophied. Anteriorly and inferolaterally the endocardial surface showed numerous abnormally thick muscular trabeculae, and endocardial fibroelastosis was present. (Fig 1). The papillary muscles of the left ventricle were small and indistinct. Short-axis cross sections demonstrated left ventricular hypertrabeculation with deep intertrabecular recesses extending into the ventricular wall; anteriorly and inferolaterally, approximately 60–70% of the wall thickness was comprised of trabeculae, the rest of the myocardium being compact. Histologically, the atrioventricular conduction axis showed granulation tissue and fibrosis in the crest of the muscular ventricular septum anterior to the AV node position and extending into the AV bundle (Fig 2). No active inflammation was identified, and the etiology of the damage in this area was unclear. Twin B also had a two-vessel umbilical cord. No other organ system malformations were identified. The monochorionic monoamnionic common twin placenta was small for gestational age and exhibited a forked umbilical cord, bifurcating 1cm from the insertion site. Twin A had a three-vessel umbilical cord. On placental examination, no abnormal clots, thrombi or fibrosis were noted.

Figure 1. Noncompaction cardiomyopathy–gross pathology in twin B.

Figure 1

In the short axis (panel A) the left ventricle shows excessive trabeculation in the anterior and inferiolateral regions of the free wall (arrows). At these points, the trabecular layer occupies more than 50% of the wall thickness. Viewed from the apex (panel B), the left ventricular outlet shows endocardial fibroelastosis (long arrow). Two of the 3 thick semilunar leaflets comprising the dysplastic aortic valve (short arrow) are visible.

Figure 2. Atrioventricular bundle with healing damage.

Figure 2

At low magnification (panel A), a transverse section through the central fibrous body shows the characteristic arrowhead configuration of the atrioventricular bundle (AVB) astride the interventricular septum (IVS). The specialized muscle of the bundle, however, contains granulation tissue and fibrosis (arrows) denoting healing damage. High magnification (panel B) discloses the interface between the healing damage and the remaining viable specialized muscle. Gomori trichrome, panel A calibration bar=300µ, panel B calibration bar=50µ).

Zygosity analysis

We sought to determine whether these anatomically discordant twins were identical by performing zygosity analysis. Formalin-fixed tissues from the deceased twin B and blood from twin A were available, and these were used to isolate genomic DNA. Electrophoresis of genomic DNA samples revealed high molecular weight DNA in twin A and fragmented DNA from fixed tissues of twin B (data not shown). STR analyses were performed indicating that twin A and twin B shared 14 alleles (Table I), indicating very high confidence in monozygosity.

Table I.

Zygosity Analyses by STR Genotyping

AMEL CSF1PO D13S317 D16S539 D18S51 D21S11 D3S1358 D5S818
Pos control X Y 10 12 11 11 11 12 15 19 30 30 14 15 11 11
Twin A (Blood) X X 11 11 10 12 10 11 10 14 29 32.2 14 16 11 12
Twin B (Liver) X X 11 11 10 12 10 11 10 14 29 32.2 14 16 11 12
Neg control

D7S820 D8S1179 FGA Penta_D Penta_E TH01 TPOX vWA

Pos control 10 11 13 13 23 24 12 12 12 13 8 9.3 8 8 17 18
Twin A (Blood) 10 12 13 14 24 26 12 14 5 10 6 6 8 8 17 17
Twin B (Liver) 10 12 13 14 24 26 12 14 n.d. 6 6 8 8 17 17
Neg control

Numbers indicate alleles present for each marker

DISCUSSION

This is the first report of monochorionic monoamniotic twins discordant for the noncompaction cardiomyopathy. There have been three other case reports describing identical twins with noncompaction [Luckie et al., 2009; Peters et al., 2012; Vinograd et al., 2012]. However, in all three previous reports, both twins were diagnosed with noncompaction (Table II).

Table II.

Comparison of Noncompaction in Twins

Study Twin
pair
sex,
age
Phenotype of
Twin (A)1
Phenotype of
Co-Twin (B)
Twin
identity
Other
abnormalities
Placenta or
Membranes
Conduction
system
Notes
Luckie et al. (2009) U.K. Male twins, 20 years LVNC2 LVNC identical, reported n.d.3 SVT4 in one twin B-thal major, transfused, iron overload
Vinograd et al. (2012) U.S. Female twins, fetal-8 months LVNC, tricuspid stenosis, pulmonary atresia LVNC, mitral valve abnormality benign CNV shared SUA5 twin B monochorionic Severity of LVNC milder in twin B
Peters et al. (2012) S.Africa Male twins, 35 years LVNC LVNC identical, reported n.d. African descent
Current report U.S. Female twins, fetal LVNC, pulmonary and aortic valve abnormality Normal STR all identical SUA twin A, forked umbilical cord monochorionic monoamniotic, common placenta Heart block, fibrosis twin A
1

Twin A or B designations here are used for twin identification only and do not necessarily reflect which twin was born first,

2

Left ventricular noncompaction,

3

No data,

4

Supraventricular tachycardia,

5

Single umbilical artery

Discordant monozygous twins emphasize that confirmed genetic identity does not preclude a discordant cardiac phenotype. Our data strongly support monozygosity, as expected from monoaminotic monochorionic twins, and the STR analyses compared blood tissue from one twin to non-blood tissue from the other, reducing the possibility of confusion due to potential hematologic microchimerism between twins. Since these twins likely split from each other at ~7–14 days post-fertilization, it is possible that the instigating events in the cardiac phenotype may have preferentially affected one twin only after splitting. Studies suggest an estimated 10% of monozygotic twins are born with a congenital anomaly, and many mechanisms have been postulated that could lead to phenotypic discordance [Hall, 2003]. It is possible that asymmetries in physiological, environmental, or mechanical events during development may result in phenotypic discordance, including initial differences in the cells at the time of twin separation, differences in vascular flow, or differences in attachment to the placenta. It is possible that in this pair of discordant twins, initially subtle differences during development led to markedly contrasting phenotypes despite genetic identity. The difference between the number of umbilical cord vessels in twins A and B, would be consistent with one twin being disproportionately affected by a potentially development-altering event. Monozygotic twins discordant for single umbilical artery have been noted in other studies, although how this contributes to disease is unclear. In some cases the twin with congenital heart disease was observed to possess the single umbilical artery [Negishi et al., 1995] while in another case, the twin without the single umbilical artery was found to have congenital heart disease [Nakayama et al., 1998].

In our study the diagnosis of noncompaction cardiomyopathy was based on >50% of the left ventricular thickness comprised of trabecular myocardium as well as absence of well-formed papillary muscles [Burke et al., 2005]. Noncompaction is thought to reflect abnormal trabecular development in the embryonic heart. At 5 weeks of development in humans, trabeculae are present, and at 5 to 8 weeks of development, the process of trabecular remodeling and compaction occurs, as the coronary arterial circulation develops. Compaction starts at the base of the heart and continues towards the apex, which may explain why noncompaction most prominently involves the midventricle to apex of the heart [Paterick et al., 2012].

Persistence of this noncompacted muscle may be the basis for heart failure and decreased contractility. Since blood flow likely plays a role in remodeling developing heart valves in the normal embryo, the abnormal flow associated with noncompaction may well have contributed to valve dysplasia, resulting in progressive aortic and pulmonic narrowing during fetal life. Complete heart block, which can be associated with noncompaction [Freedom et al., 2005], would also decrease coordinated contractility and contribute to decreased flow through the aortic and pulmonary valves. Endocardial fibroelastosis may be a response to injury [Lurie, 2010]. The fibrosis of the AV bundle and granulation tissue seen in the cardiac conduction tissues suggest a localized insult or injury, providing further evidence for an unequal critical event. Potential contributing factors could include developmental variation in the vascular supply or in the expression of cardiac developmental genes. SCN5A [Papadatos et al., 2002] gene variants were reported in Japanese noncompaction patients, particularly in individuals with arrhythmia [Shan et al., 2008], however it is important that any unifying theory for the reported twins would need to account for twin discordance in disease or penetrance. Further followup will help confirm that the co-twin remains healthy. Additional studies should strive to elucidate the cause of noncompaction and its relationship to other forms of cardiomyopathy. We conclude that monochorionic monoamniotic twins can be discordant for cardiac noncompaction despite monzygosity, and further studies should be directed at understanding the genetic and non-genetic contributions to disease predisposition.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

JS and PCU receive support from the National Institutes of Health, Grant HL092970 and HL102090, respectively. We thank the National Center for Research Resources, the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, and the Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health UCSF-CTSI, Grant KL2 RR024130. We thank Selena Martinez for technical assistance.

REFERENCES

  1. Altenberger H, Stollberger C, Finsterer J. Isolated left ventricular hypertrabeculation/noncompaction in a Turner mosaic with male phenotype. Acta Cardiol. 2009;64:99–103. doi: 10.2143/AC.64.1.2034370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Battaglia A, Hoyme HE, Dallapiccola B, Zackai E, Hudgins L, McDonald-McGinn D, Bahi-Buisson N, Romano C, Williams CA, Brailey LL, Zuberi SM, Carey JC. Further delineation of deletion 1p36 syndrome in 60 patients: a recognizable phenotype and common cause of developmental delay and mental retardation. Pediatrics. 2008;121:404–410. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-0929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bhatia NL, Tajik AJ, Wilansky S, Steidley DE, Mookadam F. Isolated noncompaction of the left ventricular myocardium in adults: a systematic overview. J Card Fail. 2011;17:771–778. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2011.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bleyl SB, Mumford BR, Thompson V, Carey JC, Pysher TJ, Chin TK, Ward K. Neonatal, lethal noncompaction of the left ventricular myocardium is allelic with Barth syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 1997;61:868–872. doi: 10.1086/514879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Budde BS, Binner P, Waldmuller S, Hohne W, Blankenfeldt W, Hassfeld S, Bromsen J, Dermintzoglou A, Wieczorek M, May E, Kirst E, Selignow C, Rackebrandt K, Muller M, Goody RS, Vosberg HP, Nurnberg P, Scheffold T. Noncompaction of the ventricular myocardium is associated with a de novo mutation in the beta-myosin heavy chain gene. PLoS One. 2007;2:e1362. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Burke A, Mont E, Kutys R, Virmani R. Left ventricular noncompaction: a pathological study of 14 cases. Hum Pathol. 2005;36:403–411. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2005.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chambers CD, Castilla EE, Orioli I, Jones KL. Intrauterine growth restriction in like-sex twins discordant for structural defects. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2006;76:246–248. doi: 10.1002/bdra.20247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chin TK, Perloff JK, Williams RG, Jue K, Mohrmann R. Isolated noncompaction of left ventricular myocardium. A study of eight cases. Circulation. 1990;82:507–513. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.82.2.507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Freedom RM, Yoo SJ, Perrin D, Taylor G, Petersen S, Anderson RH. The morphological spectrum of ventricular noncompaction. Cardiol Young. 2005;15:345–364. doi: 10.1017/S1047951105000752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hall JG. Twinning. Lancet. 2003;362:735–743. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14237-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Harper LM, Odibo AO, Roehl KA, Longman RE, Macones GA, Cahill AG. Risk of preterm delivery and growth restriction in twins discordant for structural anomalies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206:70, e71–e75. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.07.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ichida F, Tsubata S, Bowles KR, Haneda N, Uese K, Miyawaki T, Dreyer WJ, Messina J, Li H, Bowles NE, Towbin JA. Novel gene mutations in patients with left ventricular noncompaction or Barth syndrome. Circulation. 2001;103:1256–1263. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.103.9.1256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jo YS, Son HJ, Jang DG, Kim N, Lee G. Monoamniotic twins with one fetal anencephaly and cord entanglement diagnosed with three dimensional ultrasound at 14 weeks of gestation. Int J Med Sci. 2011;8:573–576. doi: 10.7150/ijms.8.573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ko YL, Tang TK, Chen JJ, Hshieh YY, Wu CW, Lien WP. Idiopathic hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in identical twins. Morphological heterogeneity of the left ventricle. Chest. 1992;102:783–785. doi: 10.1378/chest.102.3.783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Luckie M, Irwin B, Nair S, Greenwood J, Khattar R. Left ventricular non-compaction in identical twins with thalassaemia and cardiac iron overload. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2009;10:509–512. doi: 10.1093/ejechocard/jen319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lurie PR. Changing concepts of endocardial fibroelastosis. Cardiol Young. 2010;20:115–123. doi: 10.1017/S1047951110000181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Maron BJ, Haas TS, Lesser JR. Images in cardiovascular medicine. Diagnostic utility of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in monozygotic twins with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and identical pattern of left ventricular hypertrophy. Circulation. 2007;115:e627–e628. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.680512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Maron BJ, Towbin JA, Thiene G, Antzelevitch C, Corrado D, Arnett D, Moss AJ, Seidman CE, Young JB American Heart A, Council on Clinical Cardiology HF, Transplantation C, Quality of C, Outcomes R, Functional G, Translational Biology Interdisciplinary Working G, Council on E, Prevention. Contemporary definitions and classification of the cardiomyopathies: an American Heart Association Scientific Statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Heart Failure and Transplantation Committee; Quality of Care and Outcomes Research and Functional Genomics and Translational Biology Interdisciplinary Working Groups; and Council on Epidemiology and Prevention. Circulation. 2006;113:1807–1816. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.174287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Martinez HR, Niu MC, Sutton VR, Pignatelli R, Vatta M, Jefferies JL. Coffin-Lowry syndrome and left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy with a restrictive pattern. Am J Med Genet A. 2011;155A:3030–3034. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.33856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Nakayama D, Masuzaki H, Yoshimura S, Moriyama S, Ishimaru T. Monozygotic twins discordant for single umbilical artery and congenital heart disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179:256–257. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70281-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Negishi H, Okuyama K, Sagawa T, Makinoda S, Fujimoto S. Two cases of monozygotic twins, in each of which one fetus was prenatally diagnosed as having a heart anomaly. J Obstet Gynaecol (Tokyo 1995) 1995;21:293–298. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.1995.tb01013.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Palka P, Lange A, Burstow DJ. Different presentation of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in monozygotic twins. Heart. 2003;89:751. doi: 10.1136/heart.89.7.751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Papadatos GA, Wallerstein PM, Head CE, Ratcliff R, Brady PA, Benndorf K, Saumarez RC, Trezise AE, Huang CL, Vandenberg JI, Colledge WH, Grace AA. Slowed conduction and ventricular tachycardia after targeted disruption of the cardiac sodium channel gene Scn5a. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:6210–6215. doi: 10.1073/pnas.082121299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Paterick TE, Umland MM, Jan MF, Ammar KA, Kramer C, Khandheria BK, Seward JB, Tajik AJ. Left ventricular noncompaction: a 25-year odyssey. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012;25:363–375. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2011.12.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Peters F, Khandheria BK, Dos Santos C, Matioda H, Mogogane MT, Essop MR. Isolated left ventricular noncompaction in identical twins. Am J Cardiol. 2012;110:1175–1179. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.05.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Probst S, Oechslin E, Schuler P, Greutmann M, Boye P, Knirsch W, Berger F, Thierfelder L, Jenni R, Klaassen S. Sarcomere gene mutations in isolated left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy do not predict clinical phenotype. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2011;4:367–374. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.110.959270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ramsey KW, Slavin TP, Graham G, Hirata GI, Balaraman V, Seaver LH. Monozygotic twins discordant for trisomy 13. J Perinatol. 2012;32:306–308. doi: 10.1038/jp.2011.123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Reid JM, Houston AB, Lundmark E. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in identical twins. Br Heart J. 1989;62:384–388. doi: 10.1136/hrt.62.5.384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sarma RJ, Chana A, Elkayam U. Left ventricular noncompaction. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2010;52:264–273. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2009.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Shan L, Makita N, Xing Y, Watanabe S, Futatani T, Ye F, Saito K, Ibuki K, Watanabe K, Hirono K, Uese K, Ichida F, Miyawaki T, Origasa H, Bowles NE, Towbin JA. SCN5A variants in Japanese patients with left ventricular noncompaction and arrhythmia. Mol Genet Metab. 2008;93:468–474. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2007.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Thienpont B, Mertens L, Buyse G, Vermeesch JR, Devriendt K. Left-ventricular non-compaction in a patient with monosomy 1p36. Eur J Med Genet. 2007;50:233–236. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2007.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Ursell PC, Wigger HJ. Asplenia syndrome in conjoined twins: a case report. Teratology. 1983;27:301–304. doi: 10.1002/tera.1420270303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. van Heerde M, Hruda J, Hazekamp MG. Severe pulmonary hypertension secondary to a parachute-like mitral valve, with the left superior caval vein draining into the coronary sinus, in a girl with Turner's syndrome. Cardiol Young. 2003;13:364–366. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Vinograd CA, Srivastava S, Panesar LE. Fetal Diagnosis of Left-Ventricular Noncompaction Cardiomyopathy in Identical Twins With Discordant Congenital Heart Disease. Pediatr Cardiol. 2012 Jun 15; doi: 10.1007/s00246-012-0406-5. [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Zwijnenburg PJ, Meijers-Heijboer H, Boomsma DI. Identical but not the same: the value of discordant monozygotic twins in genetic research. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2010;153B:1134–1149. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.31091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES