Skip to main content
Current Genomics logoLink to Current Genomics
. 2013 May;14(3):166–172. doi: 10.2174/1389202911314030002

Epigenetics in Ocular Diseases

Melissa M Liu 1,2, Chi-Chao Chan 1, Jingsheng Tuo 1,*
PMCID: PMC3664466  PMID: 24179439

Abstract

Epigenetics pertains to heritable alterations in gene expression that do not involve modification of the underlying genomic DNA sequence. Historically, the study of epigenetic mechanisms has focused on DNA methylation and histone modifications, but the concept of epigenetics has been more recently extended to include microRNAs as well. Epigenetic patterning is modified by environmental exposures and may be a mechanistic link between environmental risk factors and the development of disease. Epigenetic dysregulation has been associated with a variety of human diseases, including cancer, neurological disorders, and autoimmune diseases. In this review, we consider the role of epigenetics in common ocular diseases, with a particular focus on DNA methylation and microRNAs. DNA methylation is a critical regulator of gene expression in the eye and is necessary for the proper development and postmitotic survival of retinal neurons. Aberrant methylation patterns have been associated with age-related macular degeneration, susceptibility to oxidative stress, cataract, pterygium, and retinoblastoma. Changes in histone modifications have also been observed in experimental models of diabetic retinopathy and glaucoma. The expression levels of specific microRNAs have also been found to be altered in the context of ocular inflammation, retinal degeneration, pathological angiogenesis, diabetic retinopathy, and ocular neoplasms. Although the complete spectrum of epigenetic modifications remains to be more fully explored, it is clear that epigenetic dysregulation is an important contributor to common ocular diseases and may be a relevant therapeutic target.

Keywords: Age-related macular generation, Cataract, Diabetic retinopathy, Epigenetics, DNA methylation, microRNA.

INTRODUCTION

Epigenetics pertains to the study of genomic structural modifications that affect gene expression but do not alter the underlying DNA sequence. Epigenetic mechanisms for the regulation of gene expression include DNA methylation, histone modifications, and microRNAs. Cytosine may be methylated at the C5 position, commonly in the context of CpG dinucleotides, and methylation of constitutive heterochromatin regions and promoter regions is generally associated with decreased gene transcription. Aberrant methylation in CpG islands is associated with genomic instability and has been recognized as an early genomic alteration in certain human tumors [1]. Histones, particularly at their N-terminal tails, are subject to a variety of covalent modifications, including methylation, acetylation, sumoylation, and phospho rylation. Numerous enzymes are involved in chromatin modification, the best studied of which are histone deacetylases (HDACs), histone acetyltransferases (HATs), and DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs). These modifications regulate gene transcription by affecting the accessibility of DNA and the recruitment of DNA binding proteins [2]. MicroRNAs are small RNAs that mediate post-transcriptional downregulation of gene expression [3]. Environmental exposures and diet alter epigenetic patterning, [4] and there is an age-related decrease in global levels of DNA methylation [5]. As a result, epigenetic modifications may be particularly relevant in the pathogenesis of complex age-related diseases with known environmental risk factors and modulators [4]. The role of epigenetic modification has been established in a variety of human diseases, including cancer, imprinting disorders, neurological disorders, and autoimmune diseases [6, 7]. In this review, we focus on the role of epigenetics in common ocular diseases.

DNA METHYLATION

Epigenetic mechanisms are critical regulators of gene expression in ocular development and homeostasis. DNA methyltransferases 1, 3a, and 3b (Dnmt1, Dnmt3a, and Dnmt3b) are robustly expressed in early embryonic stages, and differential nuclear localization patterns in rod and cone photoreceptors suggest that DNA methylation may contribute to cell fate determination in retinal neurons [8]. In mice, retina specific deletion of DNA methyltransferase 1 (Dnmt1) disrupts retinal differentiation and leads to rapid retinal degeneration, with effects that are particularly pronounced in photoreceptors [9]. These results demonstrate that DNA methylation is necessary for the development and survival of retinal neurons. DNA methylation has also been shown to maintain normal cell type-specific gene expression patterns in photoreceptors and in non-photoreceptor retinal cells [10].

Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of irreversible central vision loss in the elderly, and it is estimated to affect more than 1.75 million individuals in the United States [11]. The pathogenesis of AMD involves a complex interaction of both genetic and environmental risk factors [12-15]. The role of epigenetics in AMD, however, is incompletely understood. A DNA methylation study using peripheral blood mononuclear cells was performed in one pair of monozygotic twins and two pairs of dizygotic twins with discordant AMD phenotypes to identify differentially methylated regions across the genome [16]. In the twins with AMD, there were 231 genes that showed altered methylation patterns in their promoter regions. Notably, the promoter region of IL17RC, the receptor for IL-17A and IL-17F, was hypomethylated in the twins with AMD. AMD patients also had increased frequency of IL-17RC positive monocytes in the peripheral blood and increased macular expression of IL17-RC transcripts and protein relative to non-AMD controls. Taken together, these results suggest that AMD patients may be more susceptible to Th17 mediated inflammatory responses and that this type of inflammation may contribute to AMD pathogenesis. In a recent study, bisulfite sequencing was used to perform genome-wide methylation profiling in post-mortem retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and choroid from patients with AMD. Hypermethylation of the promoter regions of two glutathione S transferase isoforms (GSTM1 and GSTM5) was identified, which correlated with decreased mRNA and protein levels [17]. Glutathione S transferases are an important in the defense against reactive oxygen species, and epigenetic downregulation of these enzymes may mediate increased susceptibility to oxidative stress in AMD.

Cataract, Pterygium, and Retinoblastoma

DNA methylation profiling was performed in human lens epithelial cells for αA-crystallin (CRYAA), which encodes a structural protein in the lens, to evaluate the role of epigenetic regulation at this locus in the development of age-related cataract. CRYAA transcript and protein levels are both downregulated, and the CpG island in the CRYAA promoter is hypermethylated in human age related cataract [18]. In pterygium, a benign condition in which wedge-shaped epithelial fibrovascular proliferation of the conjunctiva extends onto the cornea, altered methylation patterns were detected at CpG loci near the genes encoding transglutaminase 2 (TGM2), metalloproteinase 2 (MMP2), and CD24. Hypermethylation at the promoter region of TGM2 led to decreased transcript and protein levels, and hypomethylation of intergenic regions of MMP2 and the promoter region of CD24 led to increased transcript and protein levels. As these genes play a role in extracellular matrix remodeling and cell adhesion, their dysregulation may contribute to pterygium development [19]. In retinoblastoma, hypermethylation has been observed in the promoter regions of MSH6, CD44, PAX5, GATA5, TP53, VHL, GSTP1, MGMT, RB1, and CDKN2 genes that participate in a variety of cancer-related pathways, including DNA repair, tumor suppression, and cell-cell interactions [20]. Evidence also suggests that the microenvironment of the anterior chamber of the eye may induce epigenetically mediated downregulation of tumor cell expression of the chemokine receptor CXCR4, which is associated with invasion and metastasis [21]. The studies of DNA methylation in ocular diseases are summarized in (Table 1).

Table 1.

DNA Methylation and Histone Modifications in Ocular Diseases.

Gene Modification Study Population Tissue Effect/significance Reference
IL17RC Hypomethylation of promoter region AMD patients Peripheral blood mononuclear cells Increased frequency of IL-17RC+CD14+ mononuclear cells in peripheral blood [16]
GSTM1 and GSTM5 Hypermethylation of promoter region AMD patients RPE/choroid and neurosensory retina Decreased mRNA and protein levels of GSTM1 and GSTM5 [17]
CRYAA Hypermethylation of CpG island at -856 to -640 Age-related cataract patients Lens epithelial cells Decreased mRNA and protein levels of CRYAA [18]
TGM2 Hypermethylation of CpG sites at -268, -32, -29 bp Pterygium patients Pterygium tissue Decreased mRNA and protein levels of TGM2 [19]
MMP2 Hypomethylation of CpG sites at +484 and +602 bp Pterygium patients Pterygium tissue Increased mRNA and protein levels of MMP2 [19]
CD24 Hypomethylation of CpG sites at -809, -762, -631, -629 bp Pterygium patients Pterygium tissue Increased mRNA and protein levels of CD24 [19]
MSH6, CD44, PAX5, ATA5, TP53, VHL, GSTP1, GMT, RB1, and CDKN2 Hypermethylation of promoter regions Retinoblastoma patients Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded retinoblastoma tissue Epigenetic dysregulation of tumor suppressors [20]
CXCR4 Hypermethylation of CpG site in promoter region Balb/c NOD SCID mice LS174T human colon adenocarcinoma cells injected into anterior chamber Ocular microenvironment can regulate promoter methylation and expression of CXCR4 [21]
Sod2 Increased H4K20me3 and H3K9ac at promoter and enhancer regions Streptozotocin-induced diabetic rat Retina Decreased Sod2 expression [22]

HISTONE MODIFICATIONS

A study was performed in the streptozotocin-induced diabetic rat model to evaluate epigenetic regulation of manganese superoxide dismutase (Sod2) and its potential role in the development of diabetic retinopathy [22]. Hyperglycemia increased interactions between the promoter region and the NF-κB transcription factor p65. It also increased the level of histone H4 lysine 20 trimethyl (H4K20me3) and histone H3 lysine 9 acetyl (H3K9ac) marks at the Sod2 promoter and enhancer regions. H4K20me3 is a repressor of gene expression whereas H3K9ac is an activator, and their coexistence suggests that hyperglycemia affects the epigenetic regulation of sod2 in a complex manner. Here, H4K20me3 has a dominant effect, and sod2 gene expression is downregulated. This may increase susceptibility to oxidative stress and promote progression of diabetic retinopathy. A brief summary of this study is included in (Table 1). Silencing of normal gene expression has been noted as an early change associated with retinal ganglion cell (RGC) death in experimental models of glaucoma and other optic nerve diseases, and an evaluation of apoptotic RGCs in mice showed that histone deacetylase 3 (HDAC3) and histone H4 deacetylation may be critical mediators of gene silencing [23].

MICRORNAs

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) comprise another mechanism of epigenetic regulation and are single-stranded non-coding RNA molecules that contribute to post-transcriptional downregulation of gene expression. They bind complementary regions of target mRNAs, most commonly at the 3’ untranslated region (3’-UTR), and decrease translation or mark them for degradation by the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC). miRNA genes are transcribed in the nucleus, and several functionally related miRNAs may be expressed in a single primary miRNA transcript (pri-miRNA). The pri-miRNA is cleaved by Drosha into precursor miRNAs (pre-miRNAs) with characteristic hairpin structures, which are subsequently exported from the nucleus. The pre-miRNAs are processed again by Dicer in the cytoplasm to yield mature 19-25 nt miRNAs [24]. It has been estimated that approximately 30% of human genes are regulated by miRNAs [25]. Although some miRNAs function as binary off-switches in the repression of target proteins, many miRNAs are attenuated regulators that fine-tune mRNA and protein expression levels for up to hundreds of targets in a cell type-specific manner [3, 26].

miRNAs play an important role in development, ocular homeostasis, and disease, [27] and miRNA expression profiling has been performed in various ocular tissues [28]. In the human limbal-peripheral corneal epithelium, miR-143/145 are highly expressed and have been identified as key regulators of corneal epithelium formation and integrity [29]. The miR-29 family, particularly miR-29a, also regulates the synthesis of extracellular matrix in the human trabecular meshwork [27]. miR-124a levels are carefully regulated in development, and elevated levels lead to anomalies in retina and optic nerve development [30]. Microarray based miRNA profiling has been performed in the developing mouse retina and has revealed several temporally differentially expressed miRNAs [31].

Dicer and Retinal miRNAs

Retina-specific knockdown of Dicer, and the subsequent decrease in all retinal mature miRNAs, led to a decrease in scotopic and photopic electroretinogram (ERG) responses and diffuse progressive retinal degeneration [32]. Photoreceptor rosettes, which are pathological structures in retinoblastoma, diabetic retinopathy, and retinitis pigmentosa, also formed as a result of miRNA depletion. Dicer deletion in the embryonic retinas of mice resulted in increased differentiation of ganglion cells and horizontal cells, decreased late progenitor cells, and consequently decreased rod photoreceptor and Muller glia differentiation [33]. These results demonstrate that Dicer and miRNAs are indeed critical for normal retinal development, structure, and function. In the RPE of patients with geographic atrophy AMD, an advanced subtype of the disease, the level of DICER1 was found to be decreased, resulting in the accumulation of Alu element transcripts and RPE toxicity [34]. In mice, RPE-specific Dicer1deletion also led to widespread RPE cell degeneration. In addition to its critical role in miRNA processing, DICER1 appears to also be required for an entirely independent activity, related to repetitive element transcript degradation and RPE cell survival.

The specific roles of individual miRNAs remain to be more thoroughly investigated. A challenge inherent in the study of individual miRNAs is that multiple miRNAs often act on a single target, and a single miRNA often acts on multiple targets. Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1A (p21Cip1/Waf1), for example, is directly targeted by 28 miRNAs [35]. As a result, the knockout of a single miRNA may not always lead to an observable phenotype. In the case of miR-182, for example, which is highly expressed in the mouse eye, knockout did not lead to any detectable deficit [36]. Nevertheless, numerous studies have been performed to evaluate the expression and function of specific miRNAs in the retina [37]. A microarray based analysis of miRNAs differentially expressed in adult mouse retina, brain, and heart showed that at least 78 miRNAs are expressed in the retina and that 21 may be retina specific. A sensory organ-specific miRNA cluster comprised of miR-96, miR-182, and miR-183, expressed in photoreceptors and bipolar cells, was also identified [38]. miR-96, miR-182, and miR-183 are downregulated and miR-1, miR-133, and miR-142 are upregulated consistently in multiple mouse models of retinitis pigmentosa, suggesting that this may be a miRNA signature of retinal degeneration [39, 40]. In the lens epithelium, the miRNA let-7b has also been associated with increased risk for the development of age-related cataract [41].

miR-204 is highly expressed in the RPE, neural retina, lens, and ciliary body, and it plays a critical role in the proper development of the optic cup and lens by regulating Meis2 and modulating Pax6 activity. In the human trabecular meshwork, miR-204 has been found to target genes in multiple functional pathways, including apoptosis, endoplasmic reticulum stress, and inflammation [42]. In the medaka fish, knockdown of miR-204 led to microphthalmia, coloboma, and abnormalities in the lens [43]. In the RPE, miR-204 and the closely related miR-211, are the two most highly expressed miRNAs. They maintain epithelial integrity and directly target TGF-βR2 and the tight junction repressor SNAIL2. In a human fetal RPE model, miR-204 knockdown led to decreased transepithelial resistance and decreased expression of claudins 10, 16, and 19 [44]. miR-204/211 has also been shown to be a critical factor in maintaining RPE differentiation [45]. Taken together, miR-204/211 may be a relevant target for diseases involving loss of RPE integrity and RPE dedifferentiation.

Ocular Inflammation and Pathological Angiogenesis, and Uveal Melanoma

miRNAs expression levels are also altered in the context of ocular inflammation. In the murine experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis model, miR-142-5p and miR-21 were found to be upregulated, and miR-182 was found to be downregulated [46]. In cultured human RPE, there is an increase in immunoregulatory miR-155 upon exposure to pro-inflammatory cytokines that is mediated by JAK/STAT signalling [47]. Further evaluation of the activity of this miRNA may also be relevant to better understand the role of the RPE in ocular inflammatory diseases, such as uveitis.

miRNAs are significant regulators of developmental and pathological angiogenesis [48]. Pathological angiogenesis is a hallmark of a variety of ocular neovascular diseases, including exudative/neovascular AMD, diabetic retinopathy, and retinopathy of prematurity. Endothelial cell specific Dicer deletion in mice leads to defects in post-natal angiogenesis in response to a variety of pro-angiogenic signals, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), malignancies, limb ischemia, and wound healing [49]. These changes were mediated in part by the Dicer deletion induced increase in thrombospondin-1, an anti-angiogenic agent.

miR-126, highly enriched in endothelial cells, is critical for endothelial cell migration and blood vessel integrity. In mice, miR-126 deletion led to aberrant angiogenesis during development and partial embryonic lethality [50]. In zebrafish, morpholino mediated miR-126 knockdown led to reduced diameter, disrupted blood vessel organization, and compromised blood vessel integrity [51]. miR-126 functions to promote VEGF activity by directly repressing SPRED1 and PIK3R2. Recently, p21-activated kinase 1 (pak1) was also identified as a target of miR-126 and a mediator of blood vessel integrity [52]. The miR-23/27/24 clusters have also been implicated in regulating angiogenesis and choroidal neovascularization (CNV). These miRNAs are enriched in endothelial cells. Inhibition of miR-23/27 effectively suppresses the development of retinal vasculature and is protective against laser-induced CNV in mice [53]. miR-23/27 directly target Sprouty2 and Sema6A, negative regulators of angiogenesis. In an ischemia-induced model of retinal neovascularization, seven miRNAs (miR-106a, miR-146, miR-181, miR-199a, miR-214, miR-424, and miR-451) were upregulated, and three miRNAs (miR-31, miR-150, and miR-184) were downregulated. Interestingly, intraocular injection of pre-miR-31, pre-miR-150, or pre-miR-184 reduced ischemia induced retinal or laser induced CNV [54].

miRNA expression profiles were specifically evaluated in the neuroretinal and retinal endothelial cells of the streptozotocin-induced diabetic rat model 3 months after the onset of diabetes, and approximately 100 miRNAs were found to be significantly and differentially expressed in both tissue types. Notably, miRNAs responsive to NF-κB (miR-146, miR-155, miR-132, and miR-21), VEGF (miR-17-5p, miR-18a, miR-20a, miR-21, miR-31, and miR-155), and p53 (miR-34 family) signaling were upregulated, consistent with the pathophysiologic signature of diabetic retinopathy [55]. miR-200b was one of the miRNAs determined to be upregulated in the retinas of streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. In an independent study, the expression of this miRNA, a negative regulator of VEGF, was interestingly found to be decreased in the retinas of streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats 4 weeks post diabetes induction and also decreased in the retinas of human diabetic retinopathy [56].

miR-137 is a tumor suppressor and a regulator of the transcription factor microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) in uveal melanocytes. This miRNA lies in the melanoma susceptibility region on chromosome 1, and it is downregulated in uveal melanoma cell lines. Ectopic expression of miR-137 was shown to downregulate MITF, c-Met, and CDK6 and to induce cell cycle arrest. These results suggest that loss of miR-137 activity may be a component of uveal melanoma tumorigenesis [57]. The miR-17/92 cluster is an oncogenic miRNA cluster that is overexpressed in human retinoblastoma and a variety of other human cancers, and overexpression of miR-17/92 in Rb/p107 double knockout mice led to rapid development of retinoblastoma [58]. The studies of miRNA signatures in ocular diseases are summarized in (Table 2).

Table 2.

miRNA Signatures in Ocular Diseases.

miRNA Modification Study Population Tissue Effect/significance Reference
miR-96, miR-182, miR-183 Expression downregulated Multiple mouse models of retinitis pigmentosa: rho-/-, Δ307-rds, rds-/-, P347S-Rhodopsin Retina These miRNAs are part of a sensory-organ specific cluster and are normally highly expressed in retina [39, 40]
miR-1, miR-133, miR-142 Expression upregulated Multiple mouse models of retinitis pigmentosa: rho-/-, Δ307-rds, rds-/-, P347S-Rhodopsin Retina Unknown [39, 40]
let-7 Expression upregulated Age-related cataract patients Lens epithelial cells Increased expression correlated with cataract severity [41]
miR-142-5p, miR-21 Expression upregulated Mouse model of experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis Eye miR-21 targets IL-12p35 [46]
miR-182 Expression downregulated Mouse model of experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis Eye miR-182 may target IL-17A [46]
miR-23, miR-27 Locked nucleic acid-modified anti-miRNA (LNA-anti-miR) mediated knockdown Mouse model of laser-induced choroidal neovascularization Eye after intravitreal injection of LNA-anti-miRs Knockdown suppresses development of retinal vasculature, protects against laser-induced choroidal neovascularization [53]
miR-106a, miR-146, miR-181, miR-199a, miR-214, miR-424, miR-451 Expression upregulated Mouse model of ischemia-induced retinal neovascularization Retina Unknown [54]
miR-31, miR-150, miR-184 Expression downregulated Mouse model of ischemia-induced retinal neovascularization Retina Intraocular injection of pre-miR-31, 150, or 184 reduces ischemia induced retinal or laser induced CNV [54]
miR-200b Expression downregulated Streptozotocin-induced diabetic rat and human diabetic retinopathy patients Retina miR-200b mimic prevents diabetes-induced increase in VEGF [56]
miR-17/92 Expression upregulated Human and murine retinoblastoma Retinoblastoma tissue Overexpression in Rb/p107 double knockout mouse accelerates retinoblastoma development [58]

CONCLUSION

Though the complete spectrum of epigenetic modifications remains to be more fully explored, it is clear that epigenetic dysregulation is an important contributor to a variety of common ocular diseases. Many of these diseases, including AMD and diabetic retinopathy, have contributions from environmental risk factors, and alterations in epigenetic patterning may indeed be the mechanistic link between environmental exposures and gene expression changes that set the stage for the development or progression of disease. Potentially disease-relevant DNA methylation, histone modification, and microRNA alterations have been identified. However, a comprehensively characterized epigenomic signature for any ocular disease remains elusive. Although epigenetic therapies have proven particularly effective in cancer applications, [59] the benefits of these approaches have not yet been applied for human ophthalmic diseases. More thorough investigations are needed to expand our collective knowledge of epigenetic modifications in ocular development, homeostasis, and diseases to identify early biomarkers of disease and novel therapeutic targets.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The work was supported by NEI intramural Research Program.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors confirm that this article content has no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Costello JF, Fruhwald MC, Smiraglia DJ, Rush LJ, Robertson GP, Gao X, Wright FA, Feramisco JD, Peltomaki P, Lang JC, Schuller DE, Yu L, Bloomfield CD, Caligiuri MA, Yates A, Nishikawa R, Su Huang H, Petrelli NJ, Zhang X, O'Dorisio MS, Held WA, Cavenee WK, Plass C. Aberrant CpG-island methylation has non-random and tumour-type-specific patterns. Nat Genet . 2000;24(2):132–138. doi: 10.1038/72785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kouzarides T. Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell. 2007;128(4):693–705. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bartel DP. MicroRNAs.target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell. 2009;136(2):215–233. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jirtle RL, Skinner MK. Environmental epigenomics and disease susceptibility. Nat Rev enet. 2007;8(4):253–262. doi: 10.1038/nrg2045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bollati V, Schwartz J, Wright R, Litonjua A, Tarantini L, Suh H, Sparrow D, Vokonas P, Baccarelli A. Decline in genomic DNA methylation through aging in a cohort of elderly subjects. Mech Ageing Dev. 2009;130(4):234–239. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2008.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Portela A, Esteller M. Epigenetic modifications and human disease. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28(10):1057–1068. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Robertson KD. DNA methylation and human disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2005;6(8):597–610. doi: 10.1038/nrg1655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nasonkin IO, Lazo K, Hambright D, Brooks M, Fariss R, Swaroop A. Distinct nuclear localization patterns of DNA methyltransferases in developing and mature mammalian retina. J Comp Neurol. 2011;519(10):1914–1930. doi: 10.1002/cne.22613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rhee KD, Yu J, Zhao CY, Fan G, Yang XJ. Dnmt1-dependent DNA methylation is essential for photoreceptor terminal differentiation and retinal neuron survival. Cell Death Dis. 2012:3e427–0. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2012.165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Merbs SL, Khan MA, Hackler L, Jr., Oliver VF, Wan J, Qian J, Zack DJ. Cell-specific DNA methylation patterns of retina-specific genes. PLoS One . 2012;7(3):e32602–0. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Friedman DS, O'Colmain BJ, Munoz B, Tomany SC, McCarty C, de Jong PT, Nemesure B, Mitchell P, Kempen J. Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol . 2004;122(4):564–572. doi: 10.1001/archopht.122.4.564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ding X, Patel M, Chan CC. Molecular pathology of age-related macular degeneration. Prog Retin Eye Res . 2009;28(1):1–18. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2008.10.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.A randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial of high-dose supplementation with vitamins C and E, beta carotene, and zinc for age-related macular degeneration and vision loss: AREDS report no. 8. Arch Ophthalmol . 2001;119(10):1417–1436. doi: 10.1001/archopht.119.10.1417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Olson JH, Erie JC, Bakri SJ. Nutritional supplementation and age-related macular degeneration. Semin Ophthalmol . 2011;26(3):131–136. doi: 10.3109/08820538.2011.577131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Seddon JM, Reynolds R, Shah HR, Rosner B. Smoking, dietary betaine, methionine, and vitamin D in monozygotic twins with discordant macular degeneration epigenetic implications. Ophthalmology . 2011;118(7):1386–1394. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.12.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wei L, Liu B, Tuo J, Shen D, Chen P, Li Z, Liu X, Ni J, Dagur P, Sen HN, Jawad S, Ling D, Park S, Chakrabarty S, Meyerle C, Agron E, Ferris FL, 3rdChew EY, McCoy JP, Blum E, Francis PJ, Klein ML, Guymer RH, Baird PN, Chan CC, Nussenblatt RB. Hypomethylation of the IL17RC Promoter Associates with Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Cell Rep. 2012 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.10.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hunter A, Spechler PA, Cwanger A, Song Y, Zhang Z, Ying GS, Hunter AK, Dezoeten E, Dunaief JL. DNA methylation is associated with altered gene expression in AMD. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci . 2012;53(4):2089–2105. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhou P, Luo Y, Liu X, Fan L, Lu Y. Down-regulation and CpG island hypermethylation of CRYAA in age-related nuclear cataract. FASEB J. 2012 doi: 10.1096/fj.12-213702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Riau AK, Wong TT, Lan W, Finger SN, Chaurasia SS, Hou AH, Chen S, Yu SJ, Tong L. Aberrant DNA methylation of matrix remodeling and cell adhesion related genes in pterygium. PLoS One . 2011;6(2):e14687–0. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Livide G, Epistolato MC, Amenduni M, Disciglio V, Marozza A, Mencarelli MA, Toti P, Lazzi S, Hadjistilianou T, De Francesco S, D'Ambrosio A, Renieri A, Ariani F. Epigenetic and copy number variation analysis in retinoblastoma by MS-MLPA. Pathol Oncol Res . 2012;18(3):703–712. doi: 10.1007/s12253-012-9498-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Li H, Niederkorn JY, Sadegh L, Mellon J, Chen PW. Epigenetic Regulation of CXCR4 Expression by the Ocular Microenvironment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci . 2012 doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-10643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhong Q, Kowluru RA. Epigenetic changes in mitochondrial superoxide dismutase in the retina and the development of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes . 2011;60(4):1304–1313. doi: 10.2337/db10-0133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pelzel HR, Schlamp CL, Waclawski M, Shaw MK, Nickells RW. Silencing of Fem1cR3 gene expression in the DBA/2J mouse precedes retinal ganglion cell death and is associated with histone deacetylase activity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(3):1428–1435. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kim VN. MicroRNA biogenesis coordinated cropping and dicing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005;6(5):376–385. doi: 10.1038/nrm1644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lewis BP, Burge CB, Bartel DP. Conserved seed pairing, often flanked by adenosines, indicates that thousands of human genes are microRNA targets. Cell . 2005;120(1):15–20. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.12.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Krek A, Grun D, Poy MN, Wolf R, Rosenberg L, Epstein EJ, MacMenamin P, da Piedade I, Gunsalus KC, Stoffel M, Rajewsky N. Combinatorial microRNA target predictions. Nat Genet. 2005;37(5):495–500. doi: 10.1038/ng1536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Villarreal G, Jr., Oh DJ, Kang MH, Rhee DJ. Coordinated regulation of extracellular matrix synthesis by the microRNA-29 family in the trabecular meshwork. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(6):3391–3397. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Xu S. microRNA expression in the eyes and their significance in relation to functions. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2009;28(2):87–116. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2008.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lee SK, Teng Y, Wong HK, Ng TK, Huang L, Lei P, Choy KW, Liu Y, Zhang M, Lam DS, Yam GH, Pang CP. MicroRNA-145 regulates human corneal epithelial differentiation. PLoS One . 2011;6(6):e21249–0. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Qiu R, Liu K, Liu Y, Mo W, Flynt AS, Patton JG, Kar A, Wu JY, He R. The role of miR-124a in early development of the Xenopus eye. Mech Dev . 2009;126(10):804–816. doi: 10.1016/j.mod.2009.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hackler L, Jr., Wan J, Swaroop A, Qian J, Zack DJ. MicroRNA profile of the developing mouse retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci . 2010;51(4):1823–1831. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-4657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Damiani D, Alexander JJ, O'Rourke JR, McManus M, Jadhav AP, Cepko CL, Hauswirth WW, Harfe BD, Strettoi E. Dicer inactivation leads to progressive functional and structural degeneration of the mouse retina. J Neurosci . 2008;28(19):4878–4887. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0828-08.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Georgi SA, Reh TA. Dicer is required for the transition from early to late progenitor state in the developing mouse retina. J Neurosci. 2010;30(11):4048–4061. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4982-09.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kaneko H, Dridi S, Tarallo V, Gelfand BD, Fowler BJ, Cho WG, Kleinman ME, Ponicsan SL, Hauswirth WW, Chiodo VA, Kariko K, Yoo JW, Lee DK, Hadziahmetovic M, Song Y, Misra S, Chaudhuri G, Buaas FW, Braun RE, Hinton DR, Zhang Q, Grossniklaus HE, Provis JM, Madigan MC, Milam AH, Justice NL, Albuquerque RJ, Blandford AD, Bogdanovich S, Hirano Y, Witta J, Fuchs E, Littman DR, Ambati BK, Rudin CM, Chong MM, Provost P, Kugel JF, Goodrich JA, Dunaief JL, Baffi JZ, Ambati J. DICER1 deficit induces Alu RNA toxicity in age-related macular degeneration. Nature. 2011;471(7338):325–330. doi: 10.1038/nature09830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wu S, Huang S, Ding J, Zhao Y, Liang L, Liu T, Zhan R, He X. Multiple microRNAs modulate p21Cip1/Waf1 expression by directly targeting its 3' untranslated region. Oncogene . 2010;29(15):2302–2308. doi: 10.1038/onc.2010.34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Jin ZB, Hirokawa G, Gui L, Takahashi R, Osakada F, Hiura Y, Takahashi M, Yasuhara O, Iwai N. Targeted deletion of miR-182, an abundant retinal microRNA. Mol Vis. 2009;15:523–533. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sundermeier TR, Palczewski K. The physiological impact of microRNA gene regulation in the retina. Cell Mol Life Sci . 2012;69(16):2739–2750. doi: 10.1007/s00018-012-0976-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Xu S, Witmer PD, Lumayag S, Kovacs B, Valle D. MicroRNA (miRNA) transcriptome of mouse retina and identification of a sensory organ-specific miRNA cluster. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(34):25053–25066. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M700501200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Loscher CJ, Hokamp K, Wilson JH, Li T, Humphries P, Farrar GJ, Palfi A. A common microRNA signature in mouse models of retinal degeneration. Exp Eye Res . 2008;87(6):529–534. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2008.08.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Loscher CJ, Hokamp K, Kenna PF, Ivens AC, Humphries P, Palfi A, Farrar GJ. Altered retinal microRNA expression profile in a mouse model of retinitis pigmentosa. Genome Biol . 2007;8(11):R248–0. doi: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-11-r248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Peng CH, Liu JH, Woung LC, Lin TJ, Chiou SH, Tseng PC, Du WY, Cheng CK, Hu CC, Chien KH, Chen SJ. MicroRNAs and cataracts: correlation among let-7 expression, age and the severity of lens opacity. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96(5):747–751. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-300585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Li G, Luna C, Qiu J, Epstein DL, Gonzalez P. Role of miR-204 in the regulation of apoptosis, endoplasmic reticulum stress response, and inflammation in human trabecular meshwork cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(6):2999–3007. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Conte I, Carrella S, Avellino R, Karali M, Marco-Ferreres R, Bovolenta P, Banfi S. miR-204 is required for lens and retinal development via Meis2 targeting. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(35):15491–15496. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0914785107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Wang FE, Zhang C, Maminishkis A, Dong L, Zhi C, Li R, Zhao J, Majerciak V, Gaur AB, Chen S, Miller SS. MicroRNA-204/211 alters epithelial physiology. FASEB J. 2010;24(5):1552–1571. doi: 10.1096/fj.08-125856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Adijanto J, Castorino JJ, Wang ZX, Maminishkis A, Grunwald GB, Philp NJ. Microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) promotes differentiation of human retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) by regulating mi-croRNAs-204/211 expression. J Biol Chem . 2012;287(24):20491–20503. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.354761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ishida W, Fukuda K, Higuchi T, Kajisako M, Sakamoto S, Fukushima A. Dynamic changes of microRNAs in the eye during the development of experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci . 2011;52(1):611–617. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kutty RK, Nagineni CN, Samuel W, Vijayasarathy C, Hooks JJ, Redmond TM. Inflammatory cytokines regulate microRNA-155 expression in human retinal pigment epithelial cells by activating JAK/STAT pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun . 2010;402(2):390–395. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.10.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Wang S, Olson EN. AngiomiRs--key regulators of angiogenesis. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2009;19(3):205–211. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2009.04.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Suarez Y, Fernandez-Hernando C, Yu J, Gerber SA, Harrison KD, Pober JS, Iruela-Arispe ML, Merkenschlager M, Sessa WC. Dicer-dependent endothelial microRNAs are necessary for postnatal angiogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A . 2008;105(37):14082–14087. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804597105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Wang S, Aurora AB, Johnson BA, Qi X, McAnally J, Hill JA, Richardson JA, Bassel-Duby R, Olson EN. The endothelial-specific microRNA miR-126 governs vascular integrity and angiogenesis. Dev Cell . 2008;15(2):261–271. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.07.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Fish JE, Santoro MM, Morton SU, Yu S, Yeh RF, Wythe JD, Ivey KN, Bruneau BG, Stainier DY, Srivastava D. miR-126 regulates angiogenic signaling and vascular integrity. Dev Cell. 2008;15(2):272–284. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.07.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Zou J, Li WQ, Li Q, Li XQ, Zhang JT, Liu GQ, Chen J, Qiu XX, Tian FJ, Wang ZZ, Zhu N, Qin YW, Shen B, Liu TX, Jing Q. Two functional microRNA-126s repress a novel target gene p21-activated kinase 1 to regulate vascular integrity in zebrafish. Circ Res. 2011;108(2):201–209. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.225045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Zhou Q, Gallagher R, Ufret-Vincenty R, Li X, Olson EN, Wang S. Regulation of angiogenesis and choroidal neovascularization by members of microRNA-23~27~24 clusters. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A . 2011;108(20):8287–8292. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1105254108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Shen J, Yang X, Xie B, Chen Y, Swaim M, Hackett SF, Campochiaro PA. MicroRNAs regulate ocular neovascularization. Mol Ther . 2008;16(7):1208–1216. doi: 10.1038/mt.2008.104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kovacs B, Lumayag S, Cowan C, Xu S. MicroRNAs in early diabetic retinopathy in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci . 2011;52(7):4402–4409. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.McArthur K, Feng B, Wu Y, Chen S, Chakrabarti S. MicroRNA-200b regulates vascular endothelial growth factor-mediated alterations in diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes . 2011;60(4):1314–1323. doi: 10.2337/db10-1557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Chen X, Wang J, Shen H, Lu J, Li C, Hu DN, Dong XD, Yan D, Tu L. Epigenetics, microRNAs, and carcinogenesis: functional role of microRNA-137 in uveal melanoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci . 2011;52(3):1193–1199. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Conkrite K, Sundby M, Mukai S, Thomson JM, Mu D, Hammond SM, MacPherson D. miR-17~92 cooperates with RB pathway mutations to promote retinoblastoma. Genes Dev . 2011;25(16):1734–1745. doi: 10.1101/gad.17027411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Yoo CB, Jones PA. Epigenetic therapy of cancer: past, present and future. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2006;5(1):37–50. doi: 10.1038/nrd1930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Current Genomics are provided here courtesy of Bentham Science Publishers

RESOURCES