Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Inorg Chem. 2013 Mar 19;52(7):3597–3610. doi: 10.1021/ic300077g

Aromatic Difluoroboron β-Diketonate Complexes: Effects of π-Conjugation and Media on Optical Properties

Songpan Xu 1, Ruffin E Evans 1, Tiandong Liu 1, Guoqing Zhang 1,1, J N Demas 1, Carl O Trindle 1, Cassandra L Fraser 1,*
PMCID: PMC3664511  NIHMSID: NIHMS457714  PMID: 23510181

Abstract

Aromatic difluoroboron β-diketonate complexes (BF2bdks) are classic fluorescent molecules that have been explored as photochemical reagents, two-photon dyes, and oxygen sensors. To gain a better understanding of their emissive properties in both solution and polymer matrices, BF2bdks with varying aromatic groups were synthesized and their photophysical properties were investigated in both methylene chloride and poly(lactic acid) (PLA). Absorption spectra showed systematic variations that are well correlated with structural features, including the size of the aryl substituent and the presence of a para electron donating methoxy substituent. Computational modeling of the absorption spectra with the TD-B3LYP/6-311+G(d)//B3LYP/6-31G(d) formulation of density functional theory and a polarizable continuum model of dichloromethane solvent shows that all systems show intense π–π* one-electron excitations, usually from one of the highest occupied MOs (HOMO-k, k=0, 1, 2) to the lowest unoccupied MO (LUMO). Emission properties are sensitive to the dye structure and medium. Based on spectroscopic and lifetime studies, BF2bdks exhibit comparable fluorescence properties in both solutions and polymers when the diketonate group is functionalized with smaller aromatic ring systems such as benzene. For BF2bdks with larger arene ring systems, such as anthracene, emission from a strong intramolecular charge-transfer (ICT) state was also noted in both solution and in PLA. There are differences in relative intensities of peaks arising from π-π* and ICT excitations depending upon dye loading in PLA. Substituent effects were also observed. Electron-donating methoxyl groups on the aromatic rings lead to enhanced fluorescence quantum yields. For certain dyes, phosphorescence is detected at low temperature or under a nitrogen atmosphere in PLA matrices.

Keywords: Difluoroboron β-diketonate complexes, luminescence spectroscopy, intramolecular charge transfer, fluorescence, phosphorescence, medium effects

Introduction

Boron-containing materials possess impressive optical properties.1,2,3,4 Difluoroboron β-diketonate complexes (BF2bdks) are classic fluorescent molecules with large molar absorptivities and often high quantum yields5 that have been explored as photochemical reagents,6,7,8,9,10,11 two-photon materials,12,13 conjugated polymers,14,15,16 semi-conductors,17 photochromic materials,18 near IR probes,19 oxygen20 and mechanical sensors.21 Extensively investigated targets among these aromatic BF2bdks are difluoroboron dibenzoylmethane (BF2dbm) and its derivatives, given some of the parent diketones are commercial products, such as dbm22 and avobenzone.23 After boronation with BF3·Et2 in non-carbonyl solvents, most BF2dbm derivatives can be obtained as air-stable, crystalline compounds. In solutions, they typically exhibit intense blue fluorescence and some give excimer or exciplex emission9 or dye polarity24 effects at higher concentrations. When BF2dbm fluorophores are dissolved in solid-state media, such as poly(lactic acid) (PLA), also known as polylactide, long-lived room-temperature phosphorescence (RTP) is observed in the absence of oxygen.20 Through further heavy atom perturbation, in vivo luminescence oxygen sensing and dynamic hypoxia imaging are possible in tumors,25,26 the brain and other contexts. BF2dbm analogues have thus yielded promising preliminary results for cellular27, 28 and hypoxia imaging with 2-photon absorbing capability and compatibility with multiphoton methods.28 Building upon these early successes, dyes with emission profiles across the visible region are important for multiplexing, and tissue penetration depth can be increased with redshifted dyes.29 Although the emission wavelength of boron dye-polymer conjugate BF2dbmPLA may be manipulated to a certain extent by polymer molecular weight, the tuning range is limited.24 Also, this method does not shift the BF2dbm absorption out of the UV region, which can be damaging to biological systems. Thus, the development of red shifted BF2bdk derivatives can expand their utility for in vitro cellular studies, ex vivo assays, and in vivo imaging agents.

Although BF2bdk luminescence has been investigated by many groups,5,18,30,31,32,33,34 ours included, we observe interesting emissive behaviors for the boron complexes in PLA compared to solution, which have not been reported in the literature. For example, for the naphthalene derivative, BF2nbmPLA,35 the fluorescence emissions in both CH2Cl2 and in the solid state (~440 nm) were similar to those for the benzene derivative BF2dbmPLA under the same conditions.20, 36 However, the phosphorescence of BF2nbmPLA showed a significant redshift (544 nm) compared to that of BF2dbmPLA (509 nm), which suggests that π-conjugation length affects singlet and triplet states differently. Compared to the well-known difluoroboron BODIPYs (4,4-difluoro-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza-s-indacene),37,38 mechanistic studies of BF2bdk luminescence are more sparse. Therefore to better understand the optical properties of BF2bdk complexes, including emissive states, emission color range, and media effects, it is important to conduct systematic structure-property investigations.

Here we synthesized a series of simple BF2bdk derivatives (1-10) for a luminescence study in combination with computational chemistry. The boron complexes all possess aromatic hydrocarbons of different sizes. Compared to phenyl molecules 1-4, the methoxyphenyl counterparts 5-8 have the same chemical structures except that the latter series has an electron-donating methoxyl group on the benzene ring to explore substituent effects. The dimethoxy-phenyl BF2bdk 9 and the methyl-naphthyl complex 10 were also included for comparison. Nomenclature for the complexes is as indicated. We will also refer to complexes by the hydrocarbon substituents on the difluoroboron diketonate ring (i.e. Me-Ph = mbm, 1; Ph-Ph = dbm, 2; Ph-Np = nbm, 3; Ph-An = abm, 4; Me-PhOMe = mbmOMe, 5; Ph-PhOMe = dbmOMe, 6; Np-PhOMe = nbmOMe, 7; An-PhOMe = abmOMe, 8; PhOMe-PhOMe = dbm(OMe)2, 9; Me-Np = mnm, 10). Fluorescence properties of these boron complexes were investigated in CH2Cl2 via UV/Vis and fluorescence spectroscopies, and quantum yield and fluorescence lifetime measurements. Computational studies were also performed to support and provide further insight into experimental findings. Also, because many useful photophysical properties of BF2dbm derivatives arise in a solid-state environment, both fluorescence and phosphorescence were investigated for dye/PLA blends, which can inform future work with dye-polymer conjugates for imaging, sensing and other uses.

graphic file with name nihms457714u1.jpg

Experimental

Materials

Solvents CH2Cl2 and THF were dried and purified by passage through alumina columns. Boron trifluoride diethyl etherate (Aldrich, purified, redistilled) and all other reagents and solvents were used as received without further purification. Diketone ligands were prepared by Claisen condensation using NaH and boron complexes were prepared using BF3 etherate as previously described. The data of complexes 1-4,39 5,31 6,13 9,13 10 31 are in accord with the literature. The synthesis of complexes 7 and 8 is described below.

Methods

1H NMR (300 MHz) spectra were recorded on a UnityInova 300/51 instrument in CDCl3. 1H NMR spectra were referenced to the signal for residual protio chloroform at 7.26 ppm. UV/Vis spectra were recorded on a Hewlett-Packard 8452A diode-array spectrophotometer. Mass spectra were recorded using an Applied Biosystems 4800 spectrometer with a MALDI TOF/TOF analyzer. Elemental analysis was performed by Atlantic Microlab, Inc., Norcross, GA. Steady-state fluorescence emission spectra were recorded on a Horiba Fluorolog-3 Model FL3-22 spectrofluorometer (double-grating excitation and double-grating emission monochromators). Time-correlated single-photon counting (TCSPC) fluorescence lifetime measurements were performed with a NanoLED-370 (369 nm) excitation source and DataStation Hub as the SPC controller. Lifetime data were analyzed with DataStation v2.4 software from Horiba Jobin Yvon. Fluorescence quantum yields, ΦF, for BF2bdks (1-10) in CH2Cl2 were calculated versus anthracene in EtOH as a standard as previously described40 using the following values: ΦF anthracene = 0.27,41 nD 20 EtOH = 1.360, nD 20 CH2Cl2 = 1.424. Optically dilute CH2CH2 solutions of BF2bdks and EtOH solution of the anthracene standard were prepared in 1 cm path length quartz cuvettes with absorbances < 0.1. Quantum yield measurements were performed with excitation, λex = 350 nm, and an emission integration range = 365–695 nm. Phosphorescence spectra were recorded with the same instrument except that a pulsed xenon lamp (λex = 369 nm; duration < 1 ms) was used for excitation and spectra were collected with a 2 ms delay after excitation. Phosphorescence lifetimes were measured with a 500 ns multi-channel scalar (MCS) excited with a pulsed xenon lamp (λex = 369 nm; duration < 1 ms).

Compounds 1-10 were modeled using the Gaussian 09 suite of programs 42 using density functional theory for the ground state S0 and time-dependent density functional theory for the electronic excited states Sj, j = 1,…. The S0 geometry optimization was conducted with B3LYP/6-31+G(d) for the ground state in vacuo and with B3LYP/6-31G(d) for the ground state in dichloromethane, modeled as a polarizable continuum according to the default method in Gaussian 09. The optimized ground state geometries are assured to be local minima since all computed vibrational frequencies were real. Two estimates of the triplet emission frequencies were possible; both used the optimized geometry of the lowest-energy triplet state, called T1(opt), obtained with B3LYP/6-31G(d) in vacuo and in dichloromethane. One estimate is provided by the energy difference between T1(opt) and the S0 energy at the same geometry. Another estimate is obtained by TD-B3LYP/6-311+G (d) calculations of vertical S0-T1 electronic transitions. Both included the solvent model.43 , 44 Graphic representations for SCF orbitals for the ground state were obtained with GaussView 5. Triplet structures were obtained by geometry optimization B3LYP/6-31G(d).

Difluoroboron 2-naphthoyl 4′-methoxybenzoyl methane (BF2nbmOMe), 7

4-Methoxyacetophenone (150 mg, 3.0 mmol), methyl 2-naphthoate (230 mg, 1.2 mmol) and THF (20 mL) were added sequentially to a 50 mL round bottom flask. After stirring the mixture for 10 min, a suspension containing NaH (40 mg, 1.5 mmol) in THF (10 mL) was added dropwise at room temperature under N2. The mixture was stirred for 20 h then quenched with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (1 mL). THF was removed in vacuo then 1 M HCl (20 mL) was added. The aqueous phase was extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 20 mL), and combined organic layers were washed with distilled water (2 × 10 mL) and brine (10 mL), and dried over Na2SO4 before filtration and concentration in vacuo. The residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel eluting with hexanes/ethyl acetate (6:1) to give the diketone precursor, naphthoyl-4′-methoxybenzoyl methane (nbmOMe) as a yellow solid (240 mg, 79%). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 17.10 (s, 1H, COCHCOH), 8.54 (s, 1H, 1′-ArH), 8.06-7.88 (m, 6H, 3′, 4′, 5′, 8′-ArH, 3″, 5″-ArH), 7.61-7.55 (m, 2H, 6′, 7′-ArH), 7.03–6.99 (m, 2H, 2″, 6″-ArH), 6.95 (s, 1H, COCHCO), 3.90 (s, 3H, -ArOMe); MS (MALDI): m/z calcd for C20H16O3 [M+H]+ 305.11, found 305.07. Boron trifluoride diethyl etherate (81 μL, 0.64 mmol) was added to a solution of nbmOMe (130 mg, 0.43 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (20 mL) under N2. The mixture was refluxed for 12 h then the solvent was removed in vacuo. The residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel eluting with hexanes/ethyl acetate (6:1) to give 7 as a yellow solid (123 mg, 81%). Anal. calcd for C20H15BF2O3: C, 68.22; H, 4.29; F, 10.79; Found: C, 68.31; H, 4.42; F, 10.52. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.74 (s, 1H, 1′-ArH), 8.19 (d, 2H, J = 9.0 Hz, 3″, 5″-ArH), 8.08-7.89 (m, 4H, 3′, 4′, 5′, 8′-ArH), 7.66-7.60 (m, 2H, 6′, 7′-ArH), 7.24 (s, 1H, COCHCO), 7.04 (d, 2H, J = 9.0 Hz, 2″, 6″-ArH), 3.94 (s, 3H, -ArOMe); MS (MALDI): m/z calcd for C20H15BF2O3Na [M+Na]+ 375.10. Found 375.03.

Difluoroboron 2-anthracenoyl 4′-methoxybenzoyl methane (BF2abmOMe), 8

This complex was prepared as described for 7. Briefly, 2-acetylanthracene (101 mg, 0.45 mmol), methyl benzoate (91 mg, 0.55 mmol) and sodium hydride (46 mg, 1.82 mmol) in THF (20 mL) gave crude diketone anthroyl-4-methoxybenzoyl methane, abmOMe, which was purified by column chromatography on silica gel eluting with hexanes/ethyl acetate (6:1). The diketone was obtained as a crude yellow solid (72 mg, 45%). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 17.09 (s, 1H, ArCOH), 8.73 (s, 1H, 1′-ArH), 8.58 (s, 1H, 9′-ArH), 8.45 (s, 1H, 10′-ArH), 8.09-7.94 (m, 6H, 3′, 4′, 5′, 8′-ArH. 3″, 5″-ArH), 7.54-7.51 (m, 2H, 6′, 7′-ArH), 7.03-6.96 (m, 3H, 2″, 6″-ArH, COCHCO), 3.88 (s, 3H, -ArOMe). (A second species is suggested by minor peaks at 17.13 and 3.90 ppm.) The boron complex was prepared via the reaction of crude abmOMe (46 mg, 0.14 mmol) and BF3 ·OEt2 (36 μL, 0.28 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (20 mL) and was purified via column chromatography on silica gel eluting with hexanes/ethyl acetate (1:1) to give 8 (30 mg, 57%) as a red solid. Anal. calcd for C24H17BF2O3: C, 71.67; H, 4.26; F, 9.45; Found: C, 71.50; H, 4.20; F, 9.25. 1H NMR (300 MHz, d6-DMSO) δ 9.30 (s, 1H, 1′-ArH), 8.91 (s, 1H, 9′-ArH), 8.70 (s, 1H, 10′-ArH), 8.44 (d, 2H, J = 8.7 Hz, 3″, 5″-ArH), 8.27-8.14 (m, 4H, 3′, 4′, 5′, 8′-ArH), 8.01 (s, 1H, COCHCO), 7.67-7.58 (m, 2H, 6′, 7′-ArH), 7.23 (d, 2H, J = 8.7 Hz, 2″, 6″-ArH), 3.94 (s, 3H, -ArOMe); MS (MALDI): m/z calcd for C24H17BF2O3Na [M+Na]+ 425.11. Found 425.13.

Results and Discussion

The boron complexes were synthesized by Claisen condensations with NaH to generate the β-diketones, followed by boronation with BF2·OEt2 in CH2Cl2. The rate of Claisen condensation drops and the product solubility decreases with increasing arene size. All of the complexes were obtained as yellow crystals except for the anthryl compounds 4 and 8, which are dark red powders. The synthesis and solid-state fluorescence and mechanochromic properties for compounds 1-4 have been described elsewhere.39

Absorption Spectra in CH2Cl2

The optical properties of compounds 1-10 (Table 1) were first studied in CH2Cl2 because these conditions do not result in boron-ligand dissociation, 45 exciplex formation 46 , 47 or photochemical reactions7,8 seen for solvents containing Lewis bases, aromatic rings or double bonds. Absorption spectra show that all ten complexes have high extinction coefficients (26900–73000 M−1 cm−1), which is typical of π-π* transitions (Figure 1). Complex 9 with two methoxyl benzene rings has the strongest absorption; whereas, the weakest absorptions occur for complexes containing the anthracene moiety, namely 4 and 8. Compared with complexes 1-4, complexes 5-8 show similar but stronger and red-shifted absorption spectra, since the methoxyl substituent possesses electron donating ability. Another difference between the two sets of compounds is that 5-8 exhibit slightly sharper absorption spectra (i.e. smaller full width at half maximum (fwhm) for major absorption bands), perhaps due to more rigid structures from the electron donating methoxyl groups (inferred from resonance structures). Figure 1C compares BF2dbm (2) with mono-(6), and di-methoxy-substituted (9) derivatives to explore substituent effects. As for 5-8, in this series too, increasing donor strength correlates with stronger absorption and redshifted emission. The naphthyl-methyl complex 10 is included because 2 and 10 have similar π conjugation lengths; however, the absorption of 10 is different from 2 in two aspects. First, 10 shows a bimodal absorption spectrum (344 and ~380 nm shoulder), as is also noted for complexes 4 (390 and 467 nm) and 8 (404 and 451 nm); secondly, the absorption maximum of 10 is far more blue shifted than the rest. From the absorption spectra in CH2Cl2, it is reasonable to believe that complexes 4, 8, and 10 (which also have the smallest extinction coefficient values) have significant intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) character compared to the rest as evidenced by a second structureless, redshifted absorption band in addition to the main absorption peak. One common feature shared by the three molecules (4, 8, and 10) is that they are the most unsymmetrically substituted in terms of the arene sizes on the diketonate. More definitive conclusions may be reached after the emission spectral analysis and computational results are presented below.

Table 1.

Optical Properties of BF2bdks 1-10 in CH2Cl2.a

λmax/nmb ε/M−1cm−1c λem/nmd τF/nse φFg τradh Stokes Shift/cm−1
1 330 31400 416 1.04f 0.0031 -- --
2 365
380i
49200
42900i
417
396i
0.47 0.26 1.81 1060
3 376 37100 0.50 9.38
(398)a,i (36300)i (482) (4.69) (4380)
4 390 26900 417 too weak 0.30 35 1660
(467)a (8100) (596) (10.5) (4630)
5 360 39900 393 1.02 0.65 1.57 2330
6 397 57000 433 2.06 1.00 2.06 2090
7 415 66300 449 1.51 0.68 2.22 1820
8 404 29700 460i 1.96 0.49 21.4 2330
(451)a (11700) (572) (10.5) (4590)
9 411 73000 437 1.79 0.78 2.29 1450
10 344 34300 0.63 15.2
(380)a,i (9900) (459) (9.55) (4530)
a

Values in parentheses correspond to charge transfer processes.

b

Absorption maxima.

c

Extinction coefficients calculated at the absorption maxima.

d

Fluorescence emission maxima.

e

Fluorescence lifetime excited with a 369 nm LED monitored at the emission maxima. All fluorescence lifetimes are fitted with single-exponential decays unless indicated.

f

Possibly multi-exponential decay.

g

Relative quantum yield using anthracene in EtOH as a standard.

h

Radiative lifetime, where τradFF.

i

Band is present as a shoulder or second maximum.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Absorption spectra of BF2bdk complexes 1-10 in CH2Cl2.

Fluorescence in CH2Cl2

The emission spectra and fluorescence lifetimes of the complexes were also measured. The results are given in Figure 2 and Table 1. As shown in the photograph in Figure 2, under UV illumination, all the complexes exhibit intense fluorescence ranging from violet to orange-red except for 1, which only faintly fluoresces in the violet-blue region. The Stokes shift, the difference in energy between the emission state energy and the energy of its emitting state absorption, are also included. In several cases the lowest energy absorption or highest energy emission bands were estimated from a shoulder or a weaker peak than the absolute maximum (See Table 1, footnote i). For the dual emitting complexes, e.g. 4 and 8, data are reported for both emissions from each complex. The complexes are grouped into two categories. One has large Stokes shifts (~4500 cm−1) with long radiative lifetimes (>9 ns); these include 3, 10 and the low energy emissions of 4 and 8. The other complexes and the high energy emissions of 4 and 8 have small Stokes shifts (1200–2500 cm−1) and short radiative lifetimes (2 ns). As will be shown, these emissions arise from different types of excited states.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Photographs and steady-state emission spectra of BF2bdks 1-10 in CH2Cl2ex = 369 nm).

Theoretically, an increase in π conjugation length typically brings about a red-shift of emission and change in quantum yield.48 The spectra roughly follow this rule but exceptions were also observed. For example, the π donating methoxyl substituent extends the conjugation of 8 through π donation compared to 4; however the emissions of 8 are blue-shifted compared with 4. The same trend was observed for the naphthalene-containing BF2bdks 3 (Ph-Np, 482 nm), 7 (Np-PhOMe, 449 nm), and 10 (Me-Np, 459 nm), where the greatest π conjugation (7) results in the most blue-shifted emission in CH2Cl2. This observation indicates that conjugation length is not the only parameter that influences the emissive state energy of the complexes. This signals that other factors such as inductive effects or charge transfer are involved, as we will discuss in greater detail below.

The fluorescence lifetimes of the complexes were also measured and the results are collected in Table 1. The radiative lifetime for each molecule are given by

τrad=τF/φF (1)

where τF and φF are the observed lifetime and luminescence quantum yield respectively. This value, τrad which is also known as the instrinsic lifetime, is the lifetime that would be measured if the there were no radiationless processes competing with the luminescence decay. The radiative lifetime τrad is a direct measure of the allowedness of the emission. Optically dilute complexes 2-10 exhibited single exponential decays in CH2Cl2. The decay of 1 was very weak (φF <0.004) and with an estimated multi-exponential lifetime of ~1 ns. Given the weak emission, the absence of a mirror image relationship between the absorption and emission, and the anomalously long lifetime for the low quantum yield, we attribute the emission to trace impurities, possibly a very low concentration conformer, given it persists from preparation to preparation, and consider 1 to be non-or extremely weakly luminescent. The anthracene-containing complexes 4 (Ph-An) and 8 (An-PhOMe) displayed especially long fluorescence decay (10.5 ns); whereas, BF2dbm exhibited the shortest decay (0.47 ns) despite its reasonably large fluorescence quantum yield (ΦF = 0.26). However, the addition of one (6) or two (9) methoxy groups onto BF2dbm increases the quantum yields of 6 and 9 considerably.

An interesting result was also observed for the fluorescence lifetimes of the most unsymmetric molecules. Complexes 3, 4, 8, and 10, with different diketonate arenes (or Me), have the longest radiative decay times (3, nbm, τrad = 9.38 ns; 4, Ph-An, τrad = 35.0 ns; 8, An-PhOMe, τrad = 21.4 ns; and 10, Me-Np, τrad = 15.2 ns); whereas, the remaining complexes including the symmetrically substituted complexes, such as 2 (Ph-Ph) and 9 (PhOMe-PhOMe) all have much shorter radiative decays of about 2 ns. The differences in lifetimes for 3, 4, 8 and 10 coupled with the presence of weaker long wavelength absorption bands for 4, 8, and 10 indicate a fundamentally different type of excited state emission. Though not as distinct in the UV/vis spectrum for 3, it could still be argued that the low energy feature evident at ~400 nm on the absorbance band also arises from albeit weaker ICT. This is also supported by computational results presented below.

As stated above, distinct low intensity red features in the absorption spectra for unsymmetrical complexes 4, 8, and 10 are ascribed to intramolecular charge transfer, ICT. Computational modeling discussed below supports this assertion; these features are dominated by excitations in which charge is transferred from the larger more electron rich arene towards the boron diketonate center. The second and more intense feature lying at higher energy is a π–π* transition where both π and π* are delocalized throughout the molecule. Since both MOs occupy a common space, the transition has little ICT character. In the other more symmetric structures such as 2 or 9 the π–π* transition is at lower energy than any ICT transition and dominates the long-wavelength region of the absorption spectrum. As a result, shorter radiative decay lifetimes are expected.

These observations about absorbance also inform the interpretation of Ph-An (4) and An-PhOMe (8) complex emissions, where 4 has a stronger ICT tendency than 8. From the fluorescence spectra, the emission maximum of 4 is 24 nm (704 cm−1) redshifted compared to 8. Though the π donating methoxy group does not seem to make a difference in terms of the fluorescence decay (τF = 10.5 ns for both 4 and 8), the radiative lifetimes follow the expected trend, given the differing quantum yields. For 4, τrad is nearly double the value for 8 indicating a large long lived contribution from the ICT state. ICT from anthracene to the diketonate group is significant regardless of whether benzene or methoxybenzene is present as a competing donor group. In this process, the phenyl ring may serve largely as a substituent on the acceptor. The more electron rich MeO-Ph ring (vs Ph) may slightly weaken the acceptor ability of the boron diketonate ring, thus increasing the energy of the transition. In comparison to anthracene dyes 4 and 8, the phenyl derivatives 2 (Ph-Ph, τrad = 1.81 ns) and 9 (PhOMe-PhOMe, τrad = 2.29 ns) and 6 (Ph-PhOMe, τrad = 2.06 ns) are symmetrically substituted molecules with respect to the arenes and they show relatively short fluorescence decay. Within this series where π-π* transitions likely dominate the electronic transitions, the methoxy substituents exert a subtle but measureable effect on fluorescence decay.

Complexes 4 and 8 exhibit dual emissions (Table 1). There is a weak high energy emission and stronger low energy emission. They clearly come from two different ground state species as the excitation spectra (provided in the Supporting Information) are different, including in the UV. Both low and high energy emissions for 8 have a single exponential decay (Table 1). The same is true for 4, though the high energy emission is weak; a lifetime could not be obtained. Further, there is no negative preexponential factor for the long lived emission in either case, which establishes that the low energy emissions are not arising from the state responsible for the high energy emission. We suggest that there are two ground state conformers for these complexes. One has a structure conducive to the π–π* state being lowest energy in the excited state and gives rise a short lived (~2 ns) π–π* fluorescence. The dominant structure gives an ICT excited state lowest in energy and is the source of the much longer lived ICT emission (10.5 ns).

In summary, absorption and fluorescence data indicate moderate to strong ICT character for unsymmetrically substituted difluoroboron diketonates 3, 4, 8 and 10, while π-π* transitions dominate for symmetrically substituted compounds (e.g. 2 and 9). This is consistent with known solvatochromic properties of this family of dyes, as charge separated states are sensitive to the polarity of the surrounding medium.13, 49 The electronic transitions of the BF2bdks depend on their molecular symmetries. A greater disparity in π electron donating ability of the two arene rings seems to result in a stronger ICT state dominated by the more electron rich aryl group. When the bdk arene ring sizes are comparable, in more symmetrical structures, a delocalized π-π* model is proposed. These experimental conclusions are supported by computational studies discussed below.

Computational Studies

The Gaussian 09 software suite42 was used for all computational modeling. Optimized geometries for species 1-10 were determined with a density functional theory method, B3LYP/6-31G(d). The absorption spectra were characterized by time-dependent density functional theory, specifically TDB3LYP, in a more flexible basis 6-311+G(d). TD-DFT methods represent excited states as combinations of the single excitations of an electron from an orbital occupied in the SCF ground state to an orbital in the set vacant in the ground state. The wavelength and intensity of vertical absorption transitions correlate well with experimental counterparts, with R2=0.91 between absorption wavelengths computed with no consideration of solvent effects and the band maxima as reported in Table 1. Incorporation of solvent effects by the polarizable continuum model (Tomasi’s PCM) brings predicted absorption wavelengths into close agreement with observed values, increases R2 to 0.96 and also slightly improves the estimates of absorption intensities. The calculations, in vacuo or with solvent treatment, capture not only the general form of the absorption curves but track the intensity enhancement and the wavelength shifts attending structural changes. The Supporting Information contains graphs of computed spectra and pictures of relevant orbitals, which may aid in comparison.

Trends in the computed and observed absorption spectra can be described most easily by considering subsets of related molecules. The family 1-4 has a common Ph-R structure and dye group 5-8, PhOMe-R, with R = methyl, phenyl, naphthyl, and anthryl. The subset 1, 5, and 10 (Me-Ph, Me-PhOMe, and Me-Np respectively) allows examination of the relative effects of methoxy substitution and extending the aryl from phenyl to naphthyl. Finally the subset 2, 6, and 9 (Ph-Ph, Ph-PhOMe, and PhOMe-PhOMe respectively) allows discussion of the cumulative effects of methoxy substitution.

The families 1-4 and 5-8 show a red shift in the low-energy edge of the optical spectrum as the aryl substituent increases in size. Extending the size of the arene raises the energy of its highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO). If there is a reasonable energy match between the HOMO for the aryl fragment and MOs in the boron containing ring there will be substantial mixing between them. This gives rise to delocalization over the entire molecule, elevation of the highest occupied MO, and a redder transition. If the energy match is poor, the aryl MO remains localized, and the HOMO (aryl) to LUMO (delocalized) transition changes character to a charge transfer. The charge transfer band may have relatively weak intensity owing to reduction in Franck-Condon factors, and can be very red. It has been noted that the DFT functional is generally inaccurate in predicting transition energies involving long-range ICT states.50,51 Nonetheless, this feature of the absorption spectra is captured by the modeling, and is a significant part of what we see in the anthryl-substituted species 4 and 8, where contrast between aryl rings is greatest and the effect on the spectrum is most pronounced. Similar but less evident features are found for 3 and 10. For example, the computed spectrum for complex 3 suggests the presence of a weak absorption with some ICT character, to the red of a stronger π-π* transition. The weaker red absorption computed at 430 nm may not be clearly distinguishable from the stronger blue transition computed at 372 nm owing to the breadth of the absorption bands. As inferred from the experimental observations, compound 4 appears to have the greatest ICT character. See Figure 3 for a visualization of transitions for molecules 2 and 4 determined with the solvent correction. Table 2 contains a more detailed summary of these results.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Orbitals involved in the absorption spectra for complexes 2 (Ph-Ph) and 4 (Ph-An) in methylene chloride medium.

Table 2.

Comparison of Experimental and Calculated Optical Properties of BF2bdks 1-10 in CH2Cl2 and In Vacuo.

λmax/nma ε/M−1cm−1 b λcalc CH2Cl2/nmc fd λcalc in vacuo/nme ff Transition Type
1 330 31400 306 0.6111 306 0.4671 π-π*
2 365 49200 364 0.9764 342 0.7761 π-π*
3 376
398i
37100
36300i
372
430
0.9648
0.2791
353 0.8200 π-π*
ICT
4 390
467
26900
8100
385
539
0.8325
0.2525
359
498
0.9262
0.1723
π-π*
ICT
5 360 39900 338 0.8090 325 0.7202 π-π*
6 397 57000 387 1.0768 361 0.8994 π-π*
7 415 66300 389g,h
422g,h
0.7417
0.6436
367 0.7811 π-π*
8 404
451
29700
11700
403
525
1.2386
0.3155
382
485
0.7828
0.2092
π-π*
ICT
9 411 73000 399 1.2893 370 1.1035 π-π*
10 344
380i
34300
9900
338
405
0.7263
0.1541
324
380
0.5522
0.106
π-π*
ICT
a

Experimental absorption maxima in dichloromethane.

b

Extinction coefficients calculated at the absorption maxima in dichloromethane.

c

Computed transition wavelength (in dichloromethane medium)

d

Computed oscillator strength (in dichloromethane medium)

e

Computed transition wavelength (in vacuo)

f

Computed oscillator strength (in vacuo)

g

Two overlapping transitions: ε is proportional to the sum of squares of f’s.

h

Complex 7 exhibits two transitions of roughly comparable energy. These each have some ICT character but are predominately π-π*.

i

Low energy ICT band is present as a shoulder.

It is interesting to note that species 4 and 8 display the strongest Stokes shift in the emission. That is entirely consistent with the substantial geometrical rearrangement to be expected in the charge-transfer excited state. It is clear that the modeling is entirely consistent with the interpretation of the experimental absorption spectra, and lends indirect support to the ideas expressed in the discussion of the emission properties of these systems.

When aryl substituents on the difluoroboron diketonate ring are identical (2), spectra are dominated by HOMO to LUMO excitations; both orbitals are delocalized throughout the molecule. When the substituents are very different (4), the spectrum has a broad weak red feature derived from a HOMOLUMO ICT transition, and a higher energy more intense feature in which the HOMO-1 to LUMO and HOMO to LUMO+1 excitations are strongly mixed. Additional orbitals and characterization of the transitions may be found in the Supporting Information.

Modeling permits further remarks on the absorption spectra. In most cases one can discern two strongly overlapping bands in the leading red edge of the optical absorption spectra. The two bands seem to grow more separate and distinct as the size of the aromatic substituent grows, either in the series 1-4 or 5-8, until they become entirely separate in 4 and 8. This is evidently another consequence of the systematic elevation of the highest occupied MO of the aryl moiety, which eventually allows distinct π-π* transitions, first the low-energy ICT from HOMO to LUMO and then the fully delocalized HOMO-1 to LUMO.

The spectra for the subset 1, 5, and 10 (Me-Ph, Me-PhOMe, and Me-Np respectively) suggests that methoxy substitution on phenyl elevates the highest occupied MO without blocking its delocalization, while extending the aryl to naphthyl localizes the highest occupied MO more thoroughly on the aryl fragment. In the computed spectrum a weak red HOMO to LUMO transition distinct from the more intense and higher energy HOMO-1 to LUMO feature is noted. This finds its counterpart as a red shoulder in the first broad absorption band of the experimental spectrum.

Finally the sequence of methoxy substitution in the subset 2, 6, and 9 (Ph-Ph, Ph-PhOMe, and PhOMe-PhOMe respectively) shows successive red shifts and intensity enhancements as first one and then two para-methoxy substituents are introduced. Each methoxy elevates its aryl highest occupied MO without going so far as to impede delocalization. Again, computed results correlate with experiment.

Even approximate treatment of solvent effects has had some positive effects. For example, the excitation wavelength calculated in vacuo is always blue-shifted compared to the experimental value; the PCM version of the polar solvent dichloromethane induces a red shift, toward the experimental values. This behavior is consistent with the observed solvatochromism of this class of compounds.13,49 the calculation is still approximate however, and absorption intensities are poorly described. In particular, compounds 4 and 8 have much weaker absorption than their relatively high oscillator strengths would predict. It may be that more advanced methods52,53 can be employed to better estimate the excitation energies of this family of complexes.

Polymer Medium Effects: Fluorescence of BF2bdks/PLA Blends

The optical properties of the BF2bdk series were also measured in poly(lactic acid), a solid-state solvent, at both room temperature and 77 K with two different dye loadings. The PLA used in the experiment was synthesized via solvent-free ring-opening polymerization.54 Boron complexes 1-10 and PLA were dissolved in CH2Cl2 to form a homogenous solution that was used to cast a thin film onto the inner wall of a small vial. The film was then thoroughly dried in vacuo before luminescence measurements. The measured optical properties for these blends at room temperature are presented in Figure 4 and Table 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Figure 4

Photograph and steady state emission spectra of BF2bdk/PLA blends at 0.05% (A, B, C) and 0.5% (D, E, F) dye loadings at room temperature. (λex = 369 nm except for 1 and 5 where λex = 350 nm)

Table 3.

Optical Properties of BF2bdk/PLA Blends at Room Temperature

0.05% BF2bdk/PLA(w/w%) 0.5% BF2bdk/PLA (w/w%)
λF/nma τF/nsb λF/nma τF/nsb
1 415 n/ac 413 n/ac
2 415 1.82 415 1.67
3 448 2.31 453 3.66
4 419 (532)d weak (10.1)d 428 (540)d 1.81 (10.8)d
5 389 0.61 392 0.89
6 427 2.36 435 3.79
7 437 1.44 443 1.83
8 430 (514)d 1.22 (9.12)d 430 (531)d 1.98 (13.43)d
9 429 2.44 435 3.71
10 429 5.35 413 6.58
a

λex = 369 nm.

b

Pre-exponential weighted lifetimes. All fluorescence lifetimes were fitted with triple-exponential decays.

c

Signal too weak to be detected with current LED excitation.

d

Values in parentheses correspond to charge transfer processes.

Compared to the emission data in CH2Cl2, for the more dilute 0.05% (w/w) dye/polymer loading, the fluorescence emission maxima at room temperature are typically blue-shifted in the PLA substrate possibly owing to the fact that PLA is a less polar and a more rigid medium than CH2Cl2. A combination of solvatochromic and rigidochromic effects 55 may explain the blueshifts, which are greatest for emissions associated with ICT transitions of complexes 4 (Ph-An) and 8 (An-PhOMe) (64 and 58 nm, i.e. 2018 and 1972 cm−1 respectively) with large anthracene substituents. This too, supports the hypothesis that the strongest ICT states are present in these anthracene complexes, because in the solid-state solvent PLA, the presumed ICT “twisted configuration” may be hindered.56 The emission spectra from 4 and 8 in PLA are bimodal, with 4 possessing a more conspicuous high energy shoulder at 419 nm and 8, at 430 nm). In fact, even in CH2Cl2, both 4 and 8 have additional high energy bands around 417 nm and 460 nm respectively (Figure 2), which are weaker compared to those recorded in PLA. It is not uncommon to observe dual emission bands for donor-acceptor fluorescent molecules in polar solvents. According to twisted intermolecular charge transfer (TICT) theory,29 the two distinct fluorescence emission bands of complexes 4 and 8 might be ascribed to a TICT state (lower energy) and a co-planar locally excited state (higher energy), as discussed above for solution and computational studies. Interestingly, the shoulder emission of complex 4 shares almost the same emission maxima and vibronic features as those for the dbm complex 2; similarly for complex 8, the higher energy shoulder closely matches to the fluorescence of dbmOMe complex 6.

The fluorescence lifetimes measured for the complexes in PLA were all fitted to triple-exponential decays, except for the Me-Ph derivative 1 which did not show strong enough intensity for measurement with the current instrument setup. As has been described previously, the solid-state polymeric environments are heterogeneous and therefore, multi-exponential decays are common for BF2bdks.20 Compared to fluorescence lifetimes recorded in CH2Cl2, the values obtained in PLA did not follow an obvious trend. However, we did observe some reductions in τF in PLA versus CH2Cl2 for molecules that exhibited strong ICT character (e.g. ICT band in PLA vs CH2Cl2: 4: 10.1 vs 10.5 ns; 8: 9.12 vs 10.5 ns; and 10: 5.35 vs 9.55 ns), which again suggests that the ring twisting may be partially inhibited or that there are reduced relaxation effects in the rigid and less polar PLA matrix at room temperature.

From the steady-state fluorescence spectra, most of the polymer films with higher dye loading exhibit slightly red-shifted emission maxima (Table 3 and Figure 4), likely due to the exciton coupling or “fluorophore-fluorophore interaction”24 as previously reported. Methyl dyes 1 and 10 lacking a methoxyl substituent and the dbm complex 2 serve as exceptions. The fluorescence lifetimes, accordingly, are consistently longer for molecules showing red-shifted emission maxima at higher concentrations. The increase in lifetimes for high dye loadings has also been discussed in terms of dye-dye interactions, where excimeric species are likely to form. The propensity of BF2bdk dyes to form H aggregates has also been advanced as a possibility.57

Temperature effects were also studied by collecting steady-state emission spectra at 77 K in liquid nitrogen for all BF2bdk/PLA blends at two different dye loadings (Figure 5 and Table 4). For dye blends at lower concentrations, most emission maxima are slightly blue-shifted probably due to the rigidochromic effect at liquid nitrogen temperature. The blueshifts are generally small; the low loading of compound 2 is even slightly redshifted, indicating that PLA at room temperature, below the glass transition temperature of ~60°, is already rather rigid. At low temperature, the emission spectra also show sharper vibrational structure for complexes 1-4. The spectra are also narrowed for BF2bdks 5-8, which have methoxy substitutions, and exhibit less prominent vibrational features. Furthermore, distinct phosphorescence bands are observed for certain complexes at low temperature (e.g. naphthyl complexes 3: 537 nm, 7: 538 nm, 10: 523 nm). Further discussion of the emissive triplet state for these materials is provided below. Low temperature fluorescence lifetimes were also examined for comparison with room temperature data. Most compounds have moderately increased fluorescence lifetimes, as is expected at lower temperatures due to less collisional quenching. However, more significant differences in both emission spectra and lifetimes were observed for the 0.5% dye/PLA blends at 77K. Many of the differences are probably caused by the inhibition of excimer formation at liquid nitrogen temperature and a significant reduction in fluorescence lifetimes (e.g., lifetime change for 9, PhOMe-PhOMe, from 3.71 ns at RT to 1.75 ns at 77 K). In fact, fluorescence lifetimes at 77 K for boron dyes at different loadings are quite close to the lifetimes at room temperature, which confirms that the lengthened lifetimes at the high loadings at room temperature are not likely to be caused by trivial effects such as reabsorption and reemission. The results suggest that even in a rigid polymer matrix such as PLA, aggregate or excimer formation is possible for smaller BF2bdks at room temperature.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Fluorescence emission of BF2bdk/PLA blends at 0.05% (A, B, C) and 0.5% (D, E, F) dye loading at 77 K (λex = 369 nm except for 1 and 2 at 0.5% loading, and 5 for both loadings, where λex = 350 nm).

Table 4.

Optical Properties of BF2bdk/PLA Blends at 0.05% and 0.5% Dye Loadings at 77 K

0.05% BF2bdk/PLA (w/w%) 0.5% BF2bdk/PLA (w/w%)
λF/nma τF/nsb λF/nma τF/nsb
1 412d n/ac 391d n/ac
2 421 2.11 413d 2.19
3 441 2.40 449 3.33
4 418 (524)e weak (9.35)e 418 (531)e 1.54 (10.10)e
5 385 0.64 387 0.84
6 422 2.06 435 2.12
7 434 1.42 425 1.39
8 427 (523)e 1.85 (7.87)e 431 (529)e 2.03 (8.31)e
9 425 1.77 432 1.75
10 426 6.59 409d 7.81
a

Excited with 369 nm LED.

b

Pre-exponential weighted lifetimes. All fluorescence lifetimes were fitted with triple-exponential decays.

c

Signal too weak to be detected with current LED excitation.

d

Excited at 350 nm.

e

Values in parentheses correspond to charge transfer processes.

Polymer Medium Effects: Phosphorescence of BF2bdks/PLA Blends

As described above, in PLA matrices under air most of the complexes exhibit intense blue fluorescence except complex 4 and 8, which exhibit yellow and greenish-yellow emission, as shown in Figure 4. When steady state emission spectra were acquired at 77 K for BF2bdk/PLA blends, phosphorescence emission spectra were observed for complexes 3 (Ph-Np), 7 (Np-PhOMe) and 10 (Me-Np) (e.g. Figure 5, A–C). As previously reported,20 in the solid state, amorphous PLA serves as a rigid medium which may block thermal decay pathways and at the same time hinder quencher molecules from interacting with the dyes in the excited states.58 Thus, in PLA matrices even room temperature phosphorescence (RTP) is observed for BF2bdks. Because RTP can be quenched by oxygen in ambient air, the BF2bdk/PLA blends at two different dye loadings (0.05% vs. 0.5%) were also studied under a N2 atmosphere, collecting both total emission spectra (fluorescence plus phosphorescence), RTP spectra (gated intensity) and low temperature phosphorescence (LTP) spectra (77 K, in liquid nitrogen). Under a nitrogen atomosphere, distinct green or yellow RTP was observed for all BF2bdks/PLA blends except for complexes 1 (Me-Ph), 4 (Ph-An) and 8 (An-PhOMe). Phosphoresence for 5 was very weak; emission maxima could be determined but lifetimes were not detectable (RT under N2 in PLA: 0.05% loading: 466 nm; 0.5% loading: 487 nm). (Room and low temperature emission spectra for 5 in PLA are provided in the Supporting Information.)

The emission spectra of 2 (Ph-Ph), 6 (Ph-PhOMe) and 9 (PhOMe-PhOMe) (0.05% and 0.5% dye loading) are provided in Figure 6. Compared to fluorescence, the relative intensity of RTP is quite low; the total emission spectra (both fluorescence and phosphorescence under nitrogen) are nearly identical to the fluorescence spectra (under air) (Figure 4). Phosphorescence spectra, both room temperature and 77 K, were obtained by gated measurement with a delay time of 2 ms after excitation. The shoulder band observed in certain phosphorescence spectra (e.g. 2 at ~420 nm, 6 at 427 nm, 9 at ~430 nm) which matches the fluorescence emission, has been ascribed to delayed fluorescence caused by the thermal repopulation of the excited singlet state from the long lived excited triplet state.20,24 Complexes 2, 6 and 9 all have phenyl moieties on both sides of the diketone but are non-, mono-, and bis-methoxy substituted, respectively. With the presence of methoxyl substituents, phosphorescence emission maxima for 6 and 9 exhibit distinct red-shifts compared to 2. Whether one or two –OMe groups are present, however, seems to have little effect on emission wavelength. Unlike the more significant red-shift in fluorescence emission in going from low to high dye loading, the phosphorescence merely exhibits a slight red-shift in room temperature spectra (e.g. 6: Δλ = 8 nm (430 cm−1) for fluorescence (Table 3), Δλ = 1 nm (39 cm−1) for phosphorescence (Table 5) from low to high dye loading.) The delayed fluorescence band intensity increases and redshifts for the higher dye loading, consistent with previously reported dye loading effects.24 At 77 K, where thermal back population of the singlet state is inhibited, delayed fluoresence is not evident.20,35

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Normalized emission spectra for BF2bdk complexes 2 (Ph-Ph), 6 (Ph-PhOMe) and 9 (MeOPh-PhOMe) under N2 (left: 0.05% dye loading, right: 0.5% dye loading) at room temperature and 77K. F: total emission spectrum under N2 (with dominant fluoresence); RTP: room temperature phosphorescence spectrum; LTP: low temperature (77 K) phosphorescence spectrum (λex = 369 nm).

Table 5.

Optical Properties of BF2bdk Complexes in PLA Matrices Under Nitrogen.

0.05% BF2bdk/PLA (w/w%) 0.5% BF2bdk/PLA (w/w%)
λta/nm λp RTb/nm λp 77Kb/nm τpw0c/ms λta/nm λp RTb/nm λp 77Kb/nm τpw0c/ms
2 414 488 486 513 420 488 488 581
6 422 504 494 440 439 505 510 386
9 426 501 505 402 439 504 513 214

3 439 537 533 440 454 541 542 520
7 431 538 535 463 444 541 544 424
10 427 523 522 603 434 526 527 612
a

Total emission maxima (i.e. fluorescence peak) under N2; excited at 369 nm.

b

Phosphorescence emission maxima under N2; excited at 369 nm.

c

Pre-exponential weighted room temperature phosphorescence (RTP) lifetime fit to triple exponential decay. Excitation source: xenon flash lamp.

In the absence of oxygen, the RTP decay of BF2bdk/PLA blends is complicated and can be fitted with a triple-exponential. Pre-exponential weighted lifetimes, 59 τpw0, are provided in Table 5. The phosphorescence lifetimes decrease from 2 to 6 and 9 with increasing number of methoxy groups.

Figure 7 shows the total and phosphorescence spectra of 3 (Ph-Np complex), 7 (Np-PhOMe complex) and 10 (Me-Np complex), with 0.05% and 0.5% dye loadings, respectively. Obvious phosphorescence contributions were observed in the total emission spectra for these complexes because of the relatively strong triplet emission. Similar to complexes 2, 6 and 9, the phosphorescence exhibits red-shifted emission as a result of the increase of π conjugation length from complex 10 to complexes 3 and 7 (e.g. 0.05% dye loading: 10: 523 nm, 3: 537 nm, 7: 538 nm). At high dye loading, RTP lifetimes decrease for this series from 10 to 3 to 7 (612, 520, and 424 ms respectively, Table 5) with increased conjugation length. Delayed fluorescence bands are also observed for complexes 3 and 7 at ~450 nm and are slightly stronger at higher loading, given a smaller singlet-triplet splitting, as previously described.24 And again, delayed fluorescence is generally inhibited at low temperature, given decreased thermal back population.20,35

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Normalized emission spectra for BF2bdk complexes 3 (Ph-Np), 7 (Np-PhOMe) and 10 (Me-Np) under N2. (Left: 0.05% dye loading, Right: 0.5% dye loading) at room temperature and 77 K. F: total emission spectrum under N2 (with dominant fluoresence); RTP: room temperature phosphorescence spectrum under N2; LTP: low temperature (77K) phosphorescence spectrum. (λex = 369 nm)

Computational studies were also performed for the triplet states. We modeled the phosphorescence with the following simplifying assumptions. Treating the PLA medium as a polarizable continuous medium with the same dielectric constant as dichloromethane, and optimizing the lowest triplet with B3LYP/6-31G(d) to obtain E(T1), we can approximate the energy of the phosphorescence as either (a) the energy difference between that triplet energy E(T1) and the E(S0) energy obtained with B3LYP/6-31G(d) at that same geometry; or (b) the transition energy for the singlet-triplet excitation as computed by TD/6-311+G(d) at the B3LYP/6-31G(d) optimized T1 geometry. Table 6 shows values of estimates of both types. Linear regression shows a correlation statistic R2 = 0.89 between observed phosphorescence wavelengths and values computed by direct difference of B3LYP/6-31G(d) values, and 0.92 between observed values and estimates from TD/6-311+G(d)//B3LYP/6-31G(d) calculations. Though the linearity as measured by the R2 statistic is slightly better for the TD calculations than for direct energy differences, the TD estimates are more seriously shifted to the red. The very red results for complexes 4 and 8 suggest that their phosphorescence may lie outside the region monitored experimentally with the present instrumentation and hence, explain why phosphorescence was not observed for these anthryl derivatives.

Table 6.

Phosphorescence Emission Maxima and Computational Estimates of the Singlet Triplet Gaps.

0.05% in PLA/N2 0.5% in PLA/N2 TD S-T Absorption Wavelengthsa Wavelengths from the B3LYP S-T Energy Gapb
1 - - 540 501
2 486 488 564 554
3 533 542 701 621
4 - - 1105 899
5 466 478 549 510
6 494 505 590 547
7 535 544 691 611
8 - - 1095 886
9 505 504 590 548
10 522 527 697 616
a

Singlet-triplet excitation energy estimated by TD-B3LYP/6-311+G(d), at the UB3LYP/6-31G(d) optimized T1 geometry.

b

Direct differences of B3LYP/6-31G(d) for singlet and UB3LYP/6-31G(d) for triplet, all at the UB3LYP/6-31G(d) optimized T1 geometry.

In summary, when the dye complexes were excited from the ground state to a higher vibrational level of S1 (or S2), the majority of the molecules readily relax (10−12 s) to the lowest vibrational level, S1, through internal conversion. From the S1 state, excited molecules may decay radiatively in several nanoseconds and exhibit fluorescence. They can also undergo a spin conversion to the triplet state by intersystem crossing and exhibit phosphorescence. Although this and the reverse processes are spin forbidden, under certain conditions, back population can occur by thermal excitation of the singlet state from the triplet state if the thermal energy kT is comparable to the S1-T1 energy gap.60 Therefore, the energy gap between S1 and T1 has an important influence on this reverse conversion. Given the molecular structure of these complexes, we may draw a preliminary conclusion. Complexes with greater π conjugation length (e.g. 3 and 7 versus 10) and donor strength (e.g. 6 and 9 versus 2), are more inclined to undergo reverse intersystem crossing perhaps because a lower energy S1 level decreases the S1-T1 energy gap. For higher dye loading, dye-dye distances are shorter, aggregates may form, and the medium is more polar. Under these circumstances, singlet state energy also decreases while phosphoresence energy is little affected, facilitating intersystem crossing.

Conclusion

In summary, we have synthesized a class of aromatic hydrocarbon substituted difluoroboron diketonate complexes (BF2bdks) ranging from methyl, phenyl, methoxyphenyl, naphthyl, to anthryl groups on either side of the diketonate ligands. The optical properties of these boron complexes were studied in CH2Cl2 and in the solid-state solvent PLA. In CH2Cl2, the absorption, fluorescence emission, and fluorescence lifetimes were investigated for all of the BF2bdks. It was found that almost all complexes exhibit intense fluorescence emission (ΦF: 0.26–1) except for one molecule, which has a phenyl and methyl groups on the BF2bdk (1). While one might think that simply extending the conjugation would lead to redshifted dyes, there appear to be two or more factors at play, and properties in PLA environments are different than in solution. The emission color of the series of boron dyes are not only correlated to the length of their π conjugation but also, to the tendency for intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) in solution; larger π conjugation and stronger ICT result in more redshifted emission. In a lifetime study, we discovered that the extent of the ICT processes for these molecules are determined by the electron donating ability of the arene groups on the two sides of the diketonate complexes. A bigger difference in electron donating ability on the two sides correlates with stronger ICT and longer fluorescence lifetime, which is predicted by modeling and calculations. The optical properties of these boron dyes were then investigated in PLA substrates at two different dye loadings, 0.05% and 0.5%, at both room temperature and 77 K. Most of the boron complexes exhibit slightly blue-shifted emission and reduced fluorescence lifetimes in PLA at lower dye loadings, suggesting the hinderance of ICT processes by the polymer medium. At higher dye loadings, however, both spectra and lifetimes representative of aggregate or excimeric species were observed, which is consistent with the previous report24 and has been ascribed to dye-dye interactions in close proximity. These interactions were reduced at 77 K possibly due to the rigidity of the medium, which can limit the configurations required for excimeric species. Delayed emission, namely phosphorescence and delayed fluorescence, are also present for many dyes in PLA environments under nitrogen. Studying the emission properties of these model compounds may inform the rational design of BF2bdks for practical applications in imaging and sensing.

Supplementary Material

1_si_001

Acknowledgments

We thank the National Science Foundation (CHE 0718879, CHE 1213915) for support for this research, and the Goldwater Scholarship Foundation for a scholarship to Ruffin E. Evans. This work was also supported in part by the UVA Cancer Center through the Farrow Fellowship Fund and the NCI Cancer Center Support Grant, P30 CA44579. We also thank Nguyen D. Nguyen and Alan D. Chien for their assistance.

Footnotes

Supporting Information Available: B3LYP/6-31+G(d) and B3LYP/6-31G(d)/PCM optimized ground state structures, and Gaussian log files for TD-DFT calculations; and molecular orbital diagrams for accessible optical electronic transitions; graphs of computed spectra; results for triplets B3LYP/6-31G(d) in dichloromethane; singlet-triplet transitions B3LYP/6-311+G(d) in dichloromethane. Excitation spectra for complexes 4 and 8 in CH2Cl2 solution and PLA. Room and low temperature emission spectra for 5 in PLA. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

References

  • 1.Jäkle F. J Inorg Organomet Polym Mater. 2005;15:293. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cheng F, Jäkle F. Polym Chem. 2011;2:2122. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nagai A, Chujo Y. Chem Lett. 2010;39:430. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jäkle F. Chem Rev. 2010;110:3985. doi: 10.1021/cr100026f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ono K, Yoshikawa K, Tsuji Y, Yamaguchi H, Uozumi R, Tomura M, Taga K, Saito K. Tetrahedron. 2007;63:9354. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chow YL, Cheng X. Can J Chem. 1991;69(1331):1575. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chow YL, Ouyang X. Can J Chem. 1991;69:423. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chow YL, Wang SS. Can J Chem. 1993;71:846. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chow YL, Cheng X, Johansson CI. J Photochem Photobiol A: Chem. 1991;57:247. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ilge HD, Birckener E, Fassler D, Kozmenko MV, Kanzmin MG, Hortman H. J Photochem. 1986;32:177. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Schade W, Ilge HD, Hartman H. J Prakt Chem. 1986;328:941. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Padilha LA, Webster S, Przhonska OV, Hu H, Peceli D, Ensley TR, Bondar MV, Gerasov AO, Kovtun YP, Shandura MP, Kachkovski AD, Hagan DJ, Stryland EWV. J Phys Chem A. 2010;114:6493. doi: 10.1021/jp100963e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cogné-Laage E, Allemand JF, Ruel O, Baudin JB, Croquette V, Blanchard-Desce M, Jullien L. Chem Eur J. 2004;10:1445. doi: 10.1002/chem.200305321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nagai A, Kokado K, Nagata Y, Chujo Y. Macromolecules. 2008;41:8295. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nagata Y, Otaka H, Chujo Y. Macromolecules. 2008;41:737. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.(a) Qin Y, Kiburu I, Shah S, Jäkle F. Macromolecules. 2006;39:9041. [Google Scholar]; (b) Jäkle F. Coord Chem Rev. 2006;250:1107. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ono K, Hashizume J, Yamaguchi H, Tomura M, Nishida J-i, Yamashita Y. Org Lett. 2009;11:4326. doi: 10.1021/ol901633q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Poon C, Lam WH, Wong H, Yam VW. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:13992. doi: 10.1021/ja105537j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ran C, Xu X, Raymond SB, Ferrara BJ, Neal K, Bacskai BJ, Medarova Z, Moore A. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:15257. doi: 10.1021/ja9047043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhang G, Chen J, Payne SJ, Kooi SE, Demas JN, Fraser CL. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:8942. doi: 10.1021/ja0720255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhang G, Lu J, Sabat M, Fraser CL. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:2160. doi: 10.1021/ja9097719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Huang M, Lou Y, Xie J, Ma W, Lu Y, Yen P, Zhu B, Newmark H, Ho C. Carcinogenesis. 1998;19:1697. doi: 10.1093/carcin/19.9.1697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chatelain E, Gabard B. Photochem Photobiol. 2001;74:401. doi: 10.1562/0031-8655(2001)074<0401:pobmaa>2.0.co;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zhang G, Kooi SE, Demas JN, Fraser CL. Adv Mater. 2008;20:2099. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhang G, Palmer GM, Dewhirst MW, Fraser CL. Nat Mater. 2009;8:747. doi: 10.1038/nmat2509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Palmer GM, Fontanella AN, Zhang G, Hanna G, Fraser CL, Dewhirst MW. J Biomed Opt. 2010;15:066021. doi: 10.1117/1.3523363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pfister A, Zhang G, Zareno J, Horwitz AF, Fraser CL. ACS Nano. 2008;2:1252. doi: 10.1021/nn7003525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Contreras J, Xie J, Chen YJ, Pei H, Zhang G, Fraser CL, Hamm-Alvarez S. ACS Nano. 2010;4:2735. doi: 10.1021/nn901385y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Rubart M. Circ Res. 2004;95:1154. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000150593.30324.42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mirochnik AG, Bukvetskii BV, Fedorenko EV, Karasev VE. Russ Chem Bull. 2004;53:291. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mirochnik AG, Gukhman EV, Karasev VE, Zhikhareva PA. Russ Chem Bull. 2000;49:1024. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mayoral MJ, Cornago P, Claramunt RM, Cano M. Dalton Trans. 2010;40:377. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Nagai A, Kokado K, Nagata Y, Arita M, Chujo Y. J Org Chem. 2008;73:8605. doi: 10.1021/jo8017582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Domercq B, Grasso C, Maldonado JL, Halik M, Stephen B, Marder SR, Kippelen B. J Phys Chem B. 2004;108:8647. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Payne SJ, Zhang G, Demas JN, Fraser CL, DeGraff BA. Appl Spect. 2011;65:1321. doi: 10.1366/10-06223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zhang G, Fiore GL, StClair TL, Fraser CL. Macromolecules. 2009;42:3162. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Loudet A, Burgess K. Chem Rev. 2007;107:4891. doi: 10.1021/cr078381n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ulrich G, Ziessel R, Harriman A. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2008;48:1184. doi: 10.1002/anie.200702070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Liu T, Chien AD, Lu J, Zhang G, Fraser CL. J Mater Chem. 2011;21:8401. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Demas JN, Crosby GA. J Phys Chem. 1971;75:991. (Section II.C.2, equation 16.) [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Dawson WR, Windsor MW. J Phys Chem. 1968;72:3251. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Scalmani G, Barone V, Mennucci B, Petersson GA, Nakatsuji H, Caricato M, Li X, Hratchian HP, Izmaylov AF, Bloino J, Zheng G, Sonnenberg JL, Hada M, Ehara M, Toyota K, Fukuda R, Hasegawa J, Ishida M, Nakajima T, Honda Y, Kitao O, Nakai H, Vreven T, Montgomery JA, Jr, Peralta JE, Ogliaro F, Bearpark M, Heyd JJ, Brothers E, Kudin KN, Staroverov VN, Kobayashi R, Normand J, Raghavachari K, Rendell A, Burant JC, Iyengar SS, Tomasi J, Cossi M, Rega N, Millam JM, Klene M, Knox JE, Cross JB, Bakken V, Adamo C, Jaramillo J, Gomperts R, Stratmann RE, Yazyev O, Austin AJ, Cammi R, Pomelli C, Ochterski JW, Martin RL, Morokuma K, Zakrzewski VG, Voth GA, Salvador P, Dannenberg JJ, Dapprich S, Daniels AD, Farkas Ö, Foresman JB, Ortiz JV, Cioslowski J, Fox DJ. Gaussian 09. Gaussian, Inc; Wallingford, CT: 2009. Revision A.02. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Becke AD. J Chem Phys. 1993;98:5648. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lee C, Yang W, Parr RG. Phys Rev B. 1988;37:785. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.37.785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Macedo FP, Gwengo C, Lindeman SV, Smith MD, Gardinier JR. Eur J Inorg Chem. 2008:3200. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ono K, Yamaguchi H, Taga K, Saito K, Nishida J-i, Yamashita Y. Org Lett. 2008;11:149. doi: 10.1021/ol802470k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Truong TT, Brenner V, Ledoux G, Tran-Thi TH. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2006;5:686. doi: 10.1039/b600710b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Yoshihiro Y, Yoshio M, Takanori O, Tateaki W, Zenichi Y. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:13867. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Zhang G, Kim SH, Evans RE, Kim BH, Demas JN, Fraser CL. J Fluoresc. 2009;19:881. doi: 10.1007/s10895-009-0487-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Dreuw A, Weisman JL, Head-Gordon M. J Chem Phys. 2003;119:2943. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Cohen AJ, Mori-Sáchez P, Yang W. Science. 2008;321:792. doi: 10.1126/science.1158722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Dreuw A, Head-Gordon M. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:4007. doi: 10.1021/ja039556n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Chai J, Head-Gordon M. J Chem Phys. 2008;128:084106. doi: 10.1063/1.2834918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Dechy-Cabaret O, Martin-Vaca B, Bourissou D. Chem Rev. 2004;104:6147. doi: 10.1021/cr040002s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Peinado C, Salvador EF, Catalina F, Lozano AE. Polymer. 2001;42:2815. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Grabowski ZR, Rotkiewicz K, Rettig W. Chem Rev. 2003;103:3899. doi: 10.1021/cr940745l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Sun X, Zhang X, Li X, Liu S, Zhang G. J Mater Chem. 2012;22:17332. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Mitchell CA, Gurney RW, Jang SH, Kahr B. J Am Chem Soc. 1998;120:9726. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Carraway ER, Demas JN, DeGraff BA. Anal Chem. 1991;63:332. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Fister JC, III, Rank D, Harris JM. Anal Chem. 1995;67:4269. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1_si_001

RESOURCES