Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS
The Hippo signaling pathway is a context-dependent regulator of cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis in species ranging from Drosophila to humans. In this study, we investigated the role of the core Hippo kinases—Mst1 and Mst2—in pancreatic development and homeostasis.
METHODS
We used a Cre/LoxP system to create mice with pancreas-specific disruptions in Mst1 and Mst2 (Pdx1-Cre;Mst1−/−;Mst2fl/fl mice), the mammalian orthologs of Drosophila Hippo. We used a transgenic approach to overexpress Yap, the downstream mediator of Hippo signaling, in the developing pancreas of mice.
RESULTS
Contrary to expectations, the pancreatic mass of Pdx1-Cre;Mst1−/−;Mst2fl/fl mice was reduced compared with wild-type mice, largely because of postnatal de-differentiation of acinar cells into duct-like cells. Development of this phenotype coincided with postnatal reactivation of YAP expression. Ectopic expression of YAP during the secondary transition (a stage at which YAP is normally absent) blocked differentiation of the endocrine and exocrine compartments, whereas loss of a single Yap allele reduced acinar de-differentiation. The phenotype of Pdx1-Cre;Mst1−/−;Mst2fl/fl mice recapitulated cellular and molecular changes observed during chemical-induced pancreatitis in mice.
CONCLUSIONS
The mammalian Hippo kinases, and YAP, maintain postnatal pancreatic acinar differentiation in mice.
Keywords: mouse model, signal transduction, Hpo, Wts
Introduction
In Drosophila, the Hippo signaling pathway is composed of two core kinases, Hippo (Hpo) and Warts (Wts), which function to inactivate the downstream effector, Yorkie (Yki). In the presence of active kinases, phosphorylated Yorkie remains inactive in the cytoplasm, while in the absence of Hpo or Wts, unphosphorylated Yorkie moves into nucleus and activates transcription1. The Hippo pathway is highly conserved from Drosophila to mammals, with most components having multiple orthologs identified in mammals2. One conserved component of the pathway is Hippo itself, a serine-threonine kinase which shares high sequence similarity with its functionally-redundant mammalian orthologs Mst1 and Mst23. Deletion of the genes encoding Mst1 and Mst2 in rodent models leads to severe context-dependent phenotypes. In the liver, Mst1/2 loss leads to organ growth4–6, whereas Mst1/2 deletion in the intestine leads to over-proliferation of intestinal stem cells and colonic tumorigenesis7.
The pancreas is a close developmental relative of the liver, and the ventral pancreas and liver share a bi-potential progenitor cell population within embryonic endoderm8. Given the fact that dysregulation of Hippo signaling causes dramatic effects on liver development and postnatal growth, we sought to determine whether the Hippo kinases are also involved in pancreas development and size regulation. To this end, we took advantage of a Cre/loxP system to delete Mst1 and Mst2 in the developing mouse pancreas.
Methods and Materials
Animals
We used a Cre/LoxP system to specifically delete Mst1 and Mst2 in the pancreatic epithelium. Mst1−/− and Mst2fl/fl mice6 were bred to Pdx1-Cre mice9 to create Pdx1-Cre; Mst1−/−; Mst2fl/fl (DKO) mice. BrdU labeling experiments were performed by administering 100 mg/kg body weight of BrdU IP two hours before sacrifice. Results are representative of 6–7 animals in either control or mutant groups unless otherwise indicated. Control animals were littermates of the genotype Pdx1-Cre; Mst1+/−; Mst2fl/+ except in microarray experiments, in which the control animals were of the genotype Pdx1-Cre; Mst1−/−; Mst2fl/+ (this was done to minimize microarray effects based on litter/cage given the design of the breeding strategy). The Elastase-CreER strain has been previously reported10. In Yap1 transgenic over-expression studies, littermate embryos that lacked either the Yap or rtTA transgene were used as controls.
For the generation of Yap-deficient mice, BAC recombineering was used to introduce loxP sites into the 5' UTR and first intron of the mouse Yap1 gene along with an upstream PGK-neo selection cassette. The resulting construct was linearized and injected into V6.5 ES cells, which were screened for positive clones by southern blot analysis. Chimeric mice were generated by injection of two independently correctly targeted clones into blastocysts. Upon confirmation of germ-line transmission, chimeric mice were bred to FLPase mice (The Jackson laboratory) to delete the neo-cassette. The resulting mice were determined to be null (or severely hypomorphic) for Yap1 based on the failure to obtain homozygous offspring but normal rates of birth for heterozygous “Yaphet” animals.
For the generation of YAP-inducible mice, site directed mutagenesis was used to introduce a serine-to-alanine amino acid substitution at position 112 of the murine YAP1 protein; this mutation has been reported previously to promote nuclear translocation and activation of YAP protein1, 11. To facilitate cell lineage tracing, a GFP coding cassette was ligated in-frame to the 3’ end of the Yap1 coding region linked by a viral 2A peptide, permitting simultaneous transcription of Yap1 and GFP from a bicistronic template. This coding region was placed downstream from a tetracycline response element (pTight, Clontech) and cloned into the PacI and AscI sites of a pROSA26A targeting vector backbone. This construct was linearized with SwaI, electroporated into V6.5 ES cells, and correctly targeted ES cell clones were confirmed by southern blot. Chimeric mice were generated by independent blastocyst injection of two correctly targeted clones. The resulting tetO-YAP-GFP mice were bred to ROSA-rtTA mice (The Jackson Laboratory). The YAP-GFP transgene was induced by giving pregnant mice 2mg/ml doxycycline in in sucrose-supplemented drinking water from E13.5 to E17.5. Pregnant mice were sacrificed at E17.5 and embryos were harvested for further analysis. For developmental studies, the morning of the vaginal plug was considered embryonic day 0.5. All animal experiments were performed in accordance with NIH policies on the use of laboratory animals and approved by the IACUC of the University of Pennsylvania.
Histological Analysis and Immunostaining
Liver and pancreas tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight at 4°C followed by paraffin embedding. Paraffin sections from each sample were cut at 5 µm. H&E and immunostaining were performed as previously described6. ABC kit (Vector Laboratories) was used for immunohistochemical applications as described previously6. TUNEL assay was performed with In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit (Roche). Quantification of BrdU and TUNEL was performed by counting positive cells at 20× magnification (BrdU) or 40× magnification (TUNEL) by fluorescent microscopy. P-values were calculated by Student's t-test.
Microarray and Quantitative RT-PCR (qPCR) Analysis
Seven day-old pups were sacrificed and pancreata immediately taken out and homogenized in Qiazol (Qiagen). Total RNA was extracted from pancreas by using an RNeasy total RNA isolation Kit (Qiagen) according to manufacturer’s protocol. 500ng of total RNA were used for the synthesis of cDNA, followed by amplification and biotin labeling. A total of 1.5 µg of biotinylated cRNA was hybridized to the Mouse Gene 1.0ST microarray. After staining with streptavidin-phycoerythrin and biotinylated anti-streptavidin, samples were scanned and using GCS3000 laser scanner collected data. All statistical analyses were performed using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis database and under the R language environment. A heat map of expression was generated by Treeview13. Differentially expressed genes in control versus Hippo pathway mutant tissues are displayed in Supplementary Figure 5 and listed in Supplementary Table 1. Quantitative RT-PCR analysis was carried out using SYBR green gene expression assays (QIAGEN) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Microarray data have been deposited in the NCBI GEO database with accession number GSE44298 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE44298).
Results
Intact Hippo signaling is required for normal pancreatic morphology
To assess the role of Hippo signaling during pancreatic development, we used the Pdx1-Cre strain to specifically delete Mst1 and Mst2 in the developing pancreatic epithelium. This strain mediates deletion as early as embryonic day 914. Mutant mice were born at Mendelian ratios and appeared healthy. Western blot showed effective deletion of both Mst1 and Mst2 in pancreata from 30 day-old double knockout (“DKO”) mice, which was accompanied by an increase in the abundance of total YAP and a relative decrease in the abundance of phospho-YAP (Fig. 1A). Surprisingly, pancreas-specific deletion of Mst1/2 resulted in an approximately 2-fold decrease in pancreas mass (Fig. 1B). This finding was in sharp contrast to the overgrowth phenotype in mice with hepatic deletion of Mst1/2 (Supplementary Fig. 1; refs. 4–6).
Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining showed extensive histological abnormalities characterized by acinar cell atrophy and an expansion of duct-like cells (Fig. 1C i,v). To characterize the exocrine compartment of the mutant pancreas, we co-stained for the ductal marker cytokeratin 19 (CK19) and the acinar marker carboxypeptidase 1 (CPA1). Compared to littermate controls, DKO mutant pancreata exhibited a decrease in CPA1+ acinar cells, an increase of CK19+ duct cells, and numerous “double positive” cells (Fig. 1C ii, vi (inset), D). In the endocrine compartment, we stained for markers of β cells (Ins) and α cells (Gluc). Mst1/2 loss resulted in a disruption of islet architecture and a significant increase in the ratio of α to β cells (Fig. 1C iii, vii, 1E). Consistent with the western blot results, Mst1/2 deletion resulted in an increase in the number of YAP-expressing cells in the pancreas; YAP staining was confined to the ducts of control mice (Fig. 1C iv), whereas YAP+ cells exhibiting nuclear staining were found throughout DKO pancreata (Fig. 1C viii).
The architectural abnormalities and changes in cell ratios observed in the endocrine compartment of DKO mice prompted us to ask whether Mst1/2 loss had physiological consequences. Surprisingly, 1 month-old DKO mice were euglycemic and had a normal response to glucose challenge (Supplementary Fig. 2A). When we double-stained pancreata for YAP and C-peptide, YAP staining was not detected in the β-cells of either control or DKO animals, suggesting that islets do not express YAP (Supplementary Fig. 2B iii). Consistent with this lack of YAP expression, TUNEL and BrdU staining failed to reveal a difference in islet cell proliferation or survival in DKO animals compared to controls (Supplementary Fig. 2B iii–vi).
Pancreatic abnormalities are acquired postnatally in Mst1/2 mutant animals
To address the mechanism for the decreased pancreas size in DKO mice, we examined mutant and control animals for cell proliferation and cell death. In contrast to the endocrine compartment, the exocrine compartment of DKO mice exhibited a significant increase in cell proliferation, as indicated by BrdU staining (Fig. 2A, C). In addition, mutant pancreata also exhibited more cell death by TUNEL staining (Fig. 2B, C). Given the role of Hippo signaling in regulating stem cell pools, we stained for the markers Sox9 and Hes1, which mark pancreatic progenitor cells as well as ducts. Mutant pancreata exhibited strong staining for both of these markers (Fig. 2D, E), a finding that was further confirmed by Western blotting (Fig. 2F).
We reasoned that two general mechanisms might account for the observed ductal metaplasia phenotype in DKO pancreata. First, there could be a failure of exocrine maturation, in which pancreas progenitor cells might be blocked from acquiring a terminally differentiated acinar identity. Alternatively, acinar cells could develop normally and subsequently undergo a loss of acinar identity, causing them to become duct-like cells. To distinguish between these possibilities, we performed a series of time-course and lineage-tracing studies in which pancreata were analyzed at different time points during development, from embryonic day 15.5 (E15.5) through postnatal P14.
DKO animals exhibited normal pancreatic mass through P14, with a decrease in size becoming apparent only at P30 (Fig. 3A). Analysis of pancreatic histology revealed no abnormalities in DKO animals at E15.5 and P0 (Fig. 3E i, ii, v,vi), with only a fraction displaying metaplasia at P7 and all animals exhibiting metaplasia by P14 (Fig. 3E iii, iv, vii, viii). Co-immunoflourescence with CK19 and CPA provided further confirmation of this time-course, with acinar atrophy and ductal expansion becoming apparent at approximately P7 (Fig. 3E ix–xvi). “Double positive” cells – cells which expressed both acinar and ductal markers – were also first apparent at P7 (Fig. 3E xv, inset). qPCR for acinar-specific transcription factors revealed normal transcript levels for Mist1, Ptf1a, RBP-JL, and Lrh1 in DKO animals at P0 (Fig. 3D), suggesting that DKO pancreata had adopted a normal acinar program at birth. Taken together, these results suggest that acinar cells can differentiate in the absence of MST1 and MST2 but then fail to retain their differentiated phenotype.
To determine whether the timing of ductal metaplasia could be attributed to the normal temporal regulation of Hippo pathway components, we used western blotting to examine the expression of MST1, MST2, and YAP over the course of embryonic and postnatal pancreas development. While MST1 and YAP (but not MST2) proteins were detected in control pancreata at E15.5, their expression was almost undetectable at P0 before returning to higher levels at P7 and P14 (Fig. 3B and Supplementary Fig. 3A). In DKO animals, MST1 and MST2 were absent or markedly reduced at all time-points examined. Of note, Mst1/2 deficiency had no effect on YAP protein levels in the embryonic pancreas, whereas Mst1/2 deficiency was associated with higher levels of total YAP at P7 and P14 (Fig. 3B). As described for P30 (Fig. 1A), this increase in total YAP was associated with a decrease in the relative abundance of P-YAP (data not shown). We also performed real time PCR to assess the transcription of pathway components. Mst1 mRNA was absent and Mst2 mRNA was significantly decreased at all time-points (Fig. 3C), consistent with our western blot results and suggesting that DKO embryos lack Mst1/2 early in development. Interestingly, YAP mRNA levels did not change between control and DKO at any time point (Fig. 3C), consistent with the notion that most of MST1/2’s effects on YAP are post-translational.
We then immunostained for YAP at various time-points during pancreas development. In control pancreata, nuclear YAP staining was observed in the “trunk” regions of the pancreatic epithelium at E15.5 (Fig. 3E xvii) before becoming undetectable at birth (Fig. 3E xviii); at P7 and later stages, YAP expression was confined mainly to the ductal compartment (Fig. 3E xix, xx; Fig. 1C iv; Fig. 5B i; Supplementary Fig. 2). By contrast, abundant YAP staining was observed in pancreata from P7 and P14 DKO mice, where it was found in the abnormal duct-like structures in these animals (Fig. 3E xxiii, xxiv).
Mst1/2 loss promotes acinar de-differentiation
The abundance of “double positive” cells (co-expressing CK19 and CPA1) led us to hypothesize that the postnatal expansion of duct-like cells in DKO mice is due to the loss of acinar identity. Alternatively, duct cell proliferation (due to Pdx1-Cre-mediated deletion of Mst1/2 in duct cells) could underlie the phenotype. In order to distinguish between these possibilities, we generated ElastaseCreER, Mst1−/−; Mst2 fl/fl; RosaYFP (EKO) mice, in which tamoxifen could be used to induce acinar-specific deletion of Mst1/2. The ElastaseCreER strain has previously been shown to mediate acinar-specific recombination10 and we confirmed this specificity using the RosaYFP lineage tracer (Supplementary Fig. 3B). Three weeks after administering tamoxifen, strong YAP expression was detected in EKO YFP+ acinar cells (Supplementary Fig. 3Biii, inset) and a fraction of these cells had acquired a duct-like morphology and expressed the ductal marker CK19 (Supplementary Fig. 3C), suggesting that the duct-like cells in DKO mice were directly descended from acinar cells. In addition, we performed co-immunofluorescence staining of control and DKO pancreata at P7 and P14, in which DKO pancreata showed abundant YAP/CPA1 double positive cells, further confirming the conversion of acinar cells to a duct-like phenotype (Supplementary Fig. 3D).
To further rule out the possibility that the pancreatic phenotype in DKO animals was due simply to duct cell proliferation, we quantified the percentage of CK19 duct cells that also stained positive for the proliferation marker Ki67. At P0 and P7, there was no significant difference between control and DKO animals (Supplementary Fig. 4). Taken together, these results suggest that in the absence of Mst1/2, acinar cells differentiate normally but fail to maintain their differentiated state and de-differentiate or trans-differentiate into a duct-like state.
Yap lies downstream of Mst1/2 in the pancreas
In Drosophila, Hippo signaling results in a transcriptional readout that is mediated by the Yap ortholog Yki. To determine whether Yap lies downstream of the mammalian Hippo kinases, we performed an epistasis analysis by breeding mice with a single null allele of Yap1 onto the DKO background (resulting in DKO; YAPhet mice; Fig. 4B). Four weeks after birth, five out of twelve DKO; YAPhet animals exhibited a dramatic improvement in pancreatic histology (Fig. 4A, C), demonstrating that disruption of a single allele of YAP is sufficient to phenotypically rescue a fraction of Mst1/2 mutant animals. Hence, we conclude that YAP is a major mediator of signaling resulting from Mst1/2 loss in the pancreas.
Ectopic expression of YAP during late gestation interferes with pancreatic differentiation
Our expression analysis demonstrated that YAP is absent during the late embryonic and perinatal periods, raising the possibility that YAP must be silenced for proper pancreas differentiation. Alternatively, cells in the embryonic pancreas may not be competent to respond to YAP signals, in which case the perinatal repression of MST1, MST2, and YAP seen in control mice might be merely incidental. To address this question, we created a mouse model in which a constitutive active form of YAP could be ectopically expressed in a regulated fashion. TetO-YAP-GFP mice were made by placing a bicistronic construct containing an activated form of mouse YAP (S112A) and a GFP label downstream of tetracycline regulatory elements (Fig. 5A). When crossed to mice expressing the reverse tetracycline transactivator (rtTA) under control of the Rosa26 promoter, the resulting double transgenic mice exhibited doxycycline-inducible expression of YAP and GFP in pancreatic epithelial cells and some mesenchymal cells (Fig. 5B, C). Treatment of mice with doxycycline from E13.5 to 17.5 resulted in a marked expansion of the ductal compartment at the expense of acinar cells (Fig. 5B v, vi, D) and endocrine cells (Fig 5B vii, viii, E). Hence, embryonic cells remain competent to respond to YAP signaling late in pancreatic development, and repression of YAP is necessary for normal acinar and endocrine differentiation.
Mst1/2 mutants phenocopy the histologic changes of acute pancreatitis
Because the phenotype of P30 Mst1/2 DKO animals resembled that observed in models of acute pancreatitis15, we sought to address a potential relationship between Hippo signaling and pancreatitis. To this end, we induced acute pancreatitis (AP) in 30 day-old mice using the cholecystokinin analog caerulein and compared the phenotypes caused by AP and Mst1/2 deletion. Pancreata exposed to caerulein exhibited a dramatic increase in CK19+ ductal structures and a decrease in CPA1+ acinar structures, reminiscent of the DKO phenotype (Fig. 6A i–vi). These changes were associated with strong YAP induction (Fig. 6B, C). Conversely, several proteins known to be induced in AP – including PDX1, SOX9, Clusterin, and β-catenin – were also observed in DKO pancreata (Fig. 6A vii–xv).
The similarity between the DKO and AP phenotypes raised the possibility that the changes seen in DKO mice might be a secondary consequence of pancreatitis caused by Mst1/2 deletion. To address this possibility, we examined the timing of acinar cell death and immune infiltration in mutant animals. At postnatal day 7, a time point when histologic evidence of ductal metaplasia was already present, there was no increase in cell death by TUNEL staining or immune infiltration by CD45 staining (Supplementary Fig. 5). A week later, at P14, cell death and immune cell infiltration were both increased in DKO mice (Supplementary Fig. 5). This result indicates that acinar de-differentiation precedes cell death and the appearance of pancreatitis.
Finally, we performed a microarray analysis at P7 comparing control and DKO animals. Two hundred and one genes were differentially regulated (>1.5× fold-change) with a step-up P-value of less than 0.05 (Supplementary Fig. 6A). Notably, 85% of the differentially-expressed genes were up-regulated, indicating that MST1/2 (acting at least in part through YAP) has an overall repressive effect on gene expression. Among the differentially-expressed genes were those that act as immune mediators, such as prostaglandin synthase (Ptgds) and stromal-derived factor 1 (SDF1/CXCL2; Supplementary Fig. 6B, C). In addition, DKO animals exhibited deregulation of genes involved in integrin signaling and cell adhesion (Supplementary Fig. 6B, C). Thus, Mst1/2 loss is associated the activation of a programs predicted to drive changes in cell morphology and to promote leukocyte invasion.
Discussion
Hippo signaling has recently emerged as an evolutionarily conserved pathway involved in embryonic cell fate decisions, organ growth, and cancer16, 17. The transcriptional and functional output of this signal is highly context dependent, resulting in effects as divergent as the inner cell mass vs. trophectoderm cell fate decision18 and enhanced liver cell proliferation and survival4–6. Here, we have shown that elimination of both Mst1 and Mst2 from the pancreas results in a paradoxical decrease in pancreas size caused by a YAP-dependent loss of acinar cell identity that resembles the acinar response to acute pancreatitis.
Normal pancreatic differentiation occurs in two waves: the “primary transition” (~E10), during which there is a modest increase in the production of pancreatic hormones, and the “secondary transition” (~E14–16), during which there is a dramatic increase in the production of digestive enzymes and hormones. Following the secondary transition, newly specified acinar cells undergo further maturation and expansion before acquiring a fully differentiated morphology19. We found that MST1 and YAP, but not MST2, are normally present during the secondary transition. However, both of these kinases, and YAP itself, are absent at birth, only to reappear in the first two weeks of postnatal life. Ectopic expression of Yap during the secondary transition (E13.5-E17.5) disrupted pancreatic development, interfering with both acinar and endocrine differentiation. These observations support the hypothesis that YAP is permissive for pancreatic development during mid-gestation but that it must be repressed during or immediately after the secondary transition for maturation to occur. Similar findings have been recently reported by George et al.,20 who showed that metaplasia following pancreatic Mst1/2 deletion also occurs after the completion of exocrine differentiation. Consistent with this notion, Yap induction in the adult pancreas is sufficient to promote ductal metaplasia11.
Surprisingly, Mst1/2 deletion had no effect on YAP expression or phosphorylation at E15.5 or postnatal day 1, indicating that perinatal YAP repression occurs through an Mst1/2-independent mechanism. By contrast, Mst1/2 deletion resulted in a marked increase in total YAP abundance at postnatal day 7 and subsequent time-points, as well as an associated decrease in the relative abundance of P-YAP. Notably, Mst1/2 deletion in the liver had no effect on total YAP levels, but resulted in a dramatic decrease in the amount of P-YAP.
In mammals, at least two Lats1/2-associated phosphorylation events have been reported to regulate YAP protein activity: phosphorylation of S127, which results in binding to 14-3-3 proteins and cytoplasmic sequestration, and phosphorylation of S381, which results in ubiquitination and degradation (16, 21). As Mst1/2 regulate Lats activity, deletion of Mst1/2 could be expected to have effects on YAP phosphorylation status, YAP abundance, or both. Our results indicate that both mechanisms are employed during pancreatic development, in contrast to the liver where phosphorylation seems to be the dominant mechanism.
Our findings also provide an explanation for the timing of the mutant phenotype in DKO animals, in which loss of acinar differentiation becomes apparent only as mutant animals exhibit detectable differences in YAP expression at postnatal day 7. Together, our observations support a model in which Mst1 and Mst2 regulate postnatal YAP levels and phosphorylation status in acinar cells to maintain differentiation (Fig. 7). Although this model is supported by lineage tracing experiments and the appearance of “intermediate” cells with shared acinar/ductal features, we cannot entirely rule out the possibility that part of the Mst1/2 mutant phenotype is due to ductal (or centroacinar) expansion, which might have also contributed to the increase of YAP expression in DKO pancreata.
We found that the introduction of a single mutant Yap allele into the Mst1/2 mutant background rescues the phenotype in nearly half of DKO mutants, demonstrating that this phenotype requires YAP. In both the intestine and liver (as in the pancreas), loss of a single Yap allele is sufficient to rescue the phenotype resulting from either Mst1/2 or Nf2 loss7,22. Thus, MST1/2 signaling is highly sensitive to Yap gene dosage in several tissues.
Because the pancreatic histology of DKO mice resembled that seen following acute pancreatitis (AP), we sought to determine whether these two processes might be linked. We found that AP led to in an induction of markers that are also upregulated in DKO mutants, including YAP, HES1, and SOX9. Conversely, deletion of Mst1 and Mst2 resulted in the induction of proteins known to be associated with acute pancreatitis, including PDX1, Clusterin, and β-catenin. Thus, Mst1/2 loss phenocopies AP. Importantly, loss of acinar cell identity in the context of Mst1/2 deletion is not a secondary outcome of pancreatitis, as cell death and immune cell infiltration are first observed at postnatal day 14, well after metaplasia has occurred. Hence, in the setting of Mst1/2 deletion, immune infiltration is a consequence rather than a cause of the acinar changes. Our microarray revealed a number of genes that are upregulated at postnatal day 7 – prior to leukocyte infiltration – that could be contributing to immune cell recruitment. Further studies will be needed to determine the precise role of Hippo signaling during AP.
Several important questions remain regarding the role of Hippo in pancreatic development and homeostasis, including the identity of the upstream signals that regulate the pathway and the downstream transcriptional output that mediates its effects. Hippo signaling is thought to be initiated by heterotypic interactions between atypical cadherins on neighboring cells that act as a sensor for cell density23. Thus, it is possible that as they grow and mature, acinar cells undergo an increase in pathway activation (through the activity of MST1 and MST2), resulting in YAP repression and maintenance of the mature acinar state. Similarly, it remains unclear how pathway inactivation, and increased YAP activity, leads to changes in acinar differentiation. In our microarray comparison of control and Mst1/2 mutant pancreata, the vast majority of differentially regulated genes were upregulated in the mutant, suggesting that YAP is acting almost exclusively as an activator of gene transcription in the pancreas. Surprisingly, gene ontology analysis suggested that Mst1/2 deletion resulted in altered expression of genes involved in cell migration or cell adhesion (Supplementary Fig. 6). Thus, Hippo signaling may lead first to changes in cell shape and adhesion and only subsequently to changes in cellular identity.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Charlie Murtaugh and Joe Kissil for comments on the manuscript and helpful suggestions. We thank Doug Melton for providing Pdx1-Cre and Elastase-CreER mice and Klaus Kaestner for providing Foxa3-Cre mice. We are grateful to Nicholas George and Nora Sarvetnick for sharing unpublished work. We thank Jenny Hu, the AFCRI morphology core, the Penn Digestive Disease Center Morphology Core, and the Penn Microarray core for technical assistance.
Funding: This work was supported by grants from NIH/NIDDK (DK083355 and DK083111), the Penn Center for Molecular Studies in Digestive and Liver Diseases (P30-DK050306), the Pew Charitable Trusts, and the Abramson Family Cancer Research Institute.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Author Contributions: Study concept and design (TG, NB, JA, BZS); data acquisition (TG, CY, AP-M, RM); analysis and interpretation of data (TG, TS, AP-M, RM, AT, NB, JA, BZS); statistical analysis (TG, TS, AT); drafting the manuscript (TG, BZS); obtained funding (BZS).
Conflicts of Interest: None
Author names in bold designate shared co-first authorship.
Reference
- 1.Dong JX, Feldmann G, Huang JB, Wu S, Zhang NL, Comerford SA, Gayyed MF, Anders RA, Maitra A, Pan DJ. Elucidation of a universal size-control mechanism in Drosophila and mammals. Cell. 2007;130:1120–1133. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.07.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Halder G, Johnson RL. Hippo signaling: growth control and beyond. Development. 2011;138:9–22. doi: 10.1242/dev.045500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dan I, Watanabe NM, Kusumi A. The Ste20 group kinases as regulators of MAP kinase cascades. Trends in Cell Biology. 2001;11:220–230. doi: 10.1016/s0962-8924(01)01980-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lu L, Li Y, Kim SM, Bossuyt W, Liu P, Qiu Q, Wang YD, Halder G, Finegold MJ, Lee JS, Johnson RL. Hippo signaling is a potent in vivo growth and tumor suppressor pathway in the mammalian liver. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010;107:1437–1442. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0911427107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Song H, Mak KK, Topol L, Yun KS, Hu JX, Garrett L, Chen YB, Park O, Chang J, Simpson RM, Wang CY, Gao B, Jiang J, Yang YZ. Mammalian Mst1 and Mst2 kinases play essential roles in organ size control and tumor suppression. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010;107:1431–1436. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0911409107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zhou DW, Conrad C, Xia F, Park JS, Payer B, Yin Y, Lauwers GY, Thasler W, Lee JT, Avruch J, Bardeesy N. Mst1 and Mst2 Maintain Hepatocyte Quiescence and Suppress Hepatocellular Carcinoma Development through Inactivation of the Yap1 Oncogene. Cancer Cell. 2009;16:425–438. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.09.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zhou DW, Zhang YY, Wu H, Barry E, Yin Y, Lawrence E, Dawson D, Willis JE, Markowitz SD, Camargo FD, Avruch J. Mst1 and Mst2 protein kinases restrain intestinal stem cell proliferation and colonic tumorigenesis by inhibition of Yes-associated protein (Yap) overabundance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2011;108:E1312–E1320. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1110428108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Deutsch G, Jung JN, Zheng MH, Lora J, Zaret KS. A bipotential precursor population for pancreas and liver within the embryonic endoderm. Development. 2001;128:871–881. doi: 10.1242/dev.128.6.871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gu GQ, Dubauskaite J, Melton DA. Direct evidence for the pancreatic lineage: NGN3+cells are islet progenitors and are distinct from duct progenitors. Development. 2002;129:2447–2457. doi: 10.1242/dev.129.10.2447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Stanger BZ, Stiles B, Lauwers GY, Bardeesy N, Mendoza M, Wang Y, Greenwood A, Cheng KH, McLaughlin M, Brown D, DePinho RA, Wu H, Melton DA, Dor Y. Pten constrains centroacinar cell expansion and malignant transformation in the pancreas. Cancer Cell. 2005;8:185–195. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2005.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Camargo FD, Gokhale S, Johnnidis JB, Fu D, Bell GW, Jaenisch R, Brummelkamp TR. YAP1 increases organ size and expands undifferentiated progenitor cells. Current Biology. 2007;17:2054–2060. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.10.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zong Y, Panikkar A, Xu J, Antoniou A, Raynaud P, Lemaigre F, Stanger BZ. Notch signaling controls liver development by regulating biliary differentiation. Development. 2009;136:1727–1739. doi: 10.1242/dev.029140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Eisen MB, Spellman PT, Brown PO, Botstein D. Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1998;95:14863–14868. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.25.14863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gu GQ, Brown JR, Melton DA. Direct lineage tracing reveals the ontogeny of pancreatic cell fates during mouse embryogenesis. Mechanisms of Development. 2003;120:35–43. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4773(02)00330-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sivere JT, Lubeseder-Martellato C, Lee M, Mazur PK, Nakhai H, Radtke F, Schmid RM. Notch signaling is required for exocrine regeneration after acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:544–555. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pan D. The hippo signaling pathway in development and cancer. Dev Cell. 2010;19:491–505. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.09.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Avruch J, Zhou D, Fitamant J, Bardeesy N. Mst1/2 signalling to Yap: gatekeeper for liver size and tumour development. British Journal of Cancer. 2011;104:24–32. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6606011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Nishioka N, Inoue K-i, Adachi K, Kiyonari H, Ota M, Ralston A, Yabuta N, Hirahara S, Stephenson RO, Ogonuki N, Makita R, Kurihara H, Morin-Kensicki EM, Nojima H, Rossant J, Nakao K, Niwa H, Sasaki H. The Hippo Signaling Pathway Components Lats and Yap Pattern Tead4 Activity to Distinguish Mouse Trophectoderm from Inner Cell Mass. Developmental Cell. 2009;16:398–410. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2009.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Pan FC, Wright C. Pancreas Organogenesis: From Bud to Plexus to Gland. Developmental Dynamics. 2011;240:530–565. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.22584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.George NM, Day CE, Boerner BP, Johnson RL, Sarvetnick NE. Hippo signaling regulates pancreas development through inactivation of Yap. Mol Cell Biol. 2012;32:5116–5128. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01034-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zhao B, Tumaneng K, Guan KL. The Hippo pathway in organ size control, tissue regeneration and stem cell self-renewal. Nat Cell Biol. 2011;13:877–883. doi: 10.1038/ncb2303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhang N, Bai H, David KK, Dong J, Zheng Y, Cai J, Giovannini M, Liu P, Anders RA, Pan D. The Merlin/NF2 Tumor Suppressor Functions through the YAP Oncoprotein to Regulate Tissue Homeostasis in Mammals. Developmental Cell. 2010;19:27–38. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.06.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Schlegelmilch K, Mohseni M, Kirak O, Pruszak J, Rodriguez JR, Zhou D, Kreger BT, Vasioukhin V, Avruch J, Brummelkamp TR, Camargo FD. Yap1 Acts Downstream of alpha-Catenin to Control Epidermal Proliferation. Cell. 2011;144:782–795. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]