Skip to main content
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology logoLink to Dentomaxillofacial Radiology
. 2013 Apr;42(4):20110143. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20110143

Multiple myeloma presenting as plasmacytoma of the jaws showing prominent bone formation during chemotherapy

S-Y An 1, C-H An 1,*, K-S Choi 1, M-S Heo 2
PMCID: PMC3667514  PMID: 23520399

Abstract

A 65-year-old female visited our hospital complaining of a swelling on the left cheek area of 2 years' duration. A panoramic radiograph revealed an ill-defined osteolytic radiolucent bony lesion involving the left mandibular angle, ascending ramus, coronoid process and condylar process. Histological examination showed the mandibular lesion to be a plasmacytoma, and a systemic work-up was obtained to rule out multiple myeloma. Contrast-enhanced CT images showed a well-defined and slightly enhanced round mass on the left ramal area, accompanied by the destruction of the left ramus and posterior maxilla. An 18F-fluorodeoxy-glucose positron emission tomography CT (18F-FDG PET/CT) scan revealed a hypermetabolic mass extending from the left mandible to the left maxillary sinus. The patient had M-protein in serum and urine, plasma cells up to 36.5% on bone marrow biopsy and anaemia as a clinical complication. The patient was diagnosed with multiple myeloma and received chemotherapy with thalidomide, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone. A PET/CT scan taken 6 months later revealed that the hypermetabolic mass had disappeared and there was remarkable bone formation on the left mandible compared with a previous PET/CT scan. A panoramic radiograph taken 8 months later also demonstrated a prominent bone formation of the affected site. To the best of our knowledge, the current case is the first report of multiple myeloma presenting as plasmacytoma of the mandible with an FDG PET/CT scan. The lesion was solitary at diagnosis, and remarkable bone formation was newly observed on the radiographic examination during chemotherapy.

Keywords: multiple myeloma, plasmacytoma, positron-emission tomography, jaw, bone formation

Case report

A 65-year-old female visited our hospital complaining of a swelling on the left cheek area for 2 years. The extraoral examination revealed an asymptomatic expansion on the left cheek area. Intraorally, the involved area showed a soft to fluctuant consistency and was covered by locally ulcerated mucosa. There was no complaint of paraesthesia or anaesthesia. A panoramic radiograph was acquired using an Orthopantomograph® OP 100D (Instrumentarium Imaging, Tuusula, Finland) and revealed an ill-defined osteolytic radiolucent bony lesion involving the left mandibular angle, ascending ramus, coronoid process and condylar process (Figure 1). It also demonstrated a loss of the inferior border of the left zygomatic process of the maxilla and a soft-tissue shadow around the affected area. The lesion contained septum-like residual bone at the angle of the mandible. An incisional biopsy of the left anterior ramal area was performed under local anaesthesia, during which intra-oral bleeding was not noted. A histopathological examination of the specimen revealed a solid proliferation of plasmacytoid cells with eccentric nuclei and basophilic cytoplasm, partially showing atypia on haematoxylin and eosin staining, which was indicative of plasmacytoma (Figure 2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Panoramic radiograph shows an ill-defined osteolytic radiolucency on the left mandibular angle–ramus–condyle–coronoid process area. It also reveals a loss of the inferior border of the left zygomatic process of the maxilla and a septum-like residual bone at the angle of the mandible

Figure 2.

Figure 2

A histopathological examination of the specimen reveals a solid proliferation of plasmacytoid cells with eccentric nuclei and basophilic cytoplasm, partially showing atypia (haematoxylin and eosin stain; original magnification ×400)

The patient was referred to haemato-oncology and a systemic work-up for the final diagnosis was performed to differentiate the solitary plasmacytoma of bone and multiple myeloma. A skeletal radiographic survey including posteroanterior and lateral skull views was performed and showed no additional osteolytic lesion. Contrast-enhanced CT (LightSpeed Ultra; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI) showed a well-defined and slightly enhanced round mass on the left ramal area, accompanied by the destruction of the left ramus and posterior maxilla (Figure 3). An 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography CT (18F-FDG PET/CT) scan combined PET/CT unit (Reveal RT-HiRez CTIMI; Knoxville, TN: a six-slice CT scanner) revealed a hypermetabolic mass extending from the left mandible to the left maxillary sinus (Figure 4).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Contrast-enhanced CT image shows a well-defined, slightly enhanced round mass on the left mandibular ramal area and the destruction of the left ramus and the posterior maxilla

Figure 4.

Figure 4

A positron emission tomography CT scan reveals a hypermetabolic mass extending from the left mandible to the left maxillary sinus

Laboratory analysis showed an M-protein [immunoglobulin (IgG) κ type] on serum and urine electrophoresis and a mildly reversed albumin/globulin ratio; however, any other finding such as renal failure or hypercalcaemia was not found. A bone marrow biopsy showed increased plasma cells up to 36.5% of the absolute neutrophil count, which were slightly immature. The plasma cells had eccentric nuclei and showed multinuclearity. The red cells and the granulocytic series were hypoplastic. The final diagnosis was multiple myeloma.

The patient was recommended for multiagent chemotherapy and prescribed thalidomide, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone. An 18F-FDG PET/CT scan taken 6 months later revealed the disappearance of the hypermetabolic mass and a remarkable bone formation on the left mandible compared with the previous 18F-FDG PET/CT scan (Figure 5). A panoramic radiograph taken 8 months later also demonstrated a prominent bone formation and cortical outlines of the affected mandible and the inferior alveolar canal (Figure 6). Deformity was noted on the newly formed left condyle. An ill-defined osteolytic lesion of the right mandibular canine area was suspected that had not been revealed on the 18F-FDG PET/CT scan 2 months previously. A new diffuse bone marrow defect could not be excluded. The patient had tolerated the chemotherapy well until now.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

A positron emission tomography CT scan 6 months later showing the disappearance of the hypermetabolic mass and remarkable bone formation on the left mandible

Figure 6.

Figure 6

A panoramic radiograph, taken 8 months later, demonstrates a prominent bone formation and discontinuous cortical outlines of the affected mandible and the inferior alveolar canal. It shows a decrease in the ramal width and a deformity of the left condyle

Discussion

Multiple myeloma is a malignant neoplasm of plasma cells. It is characterized by a proliferation of a single clone of abnormal immunoglobulin-secreting plasma cells. Plasma cell neoplasms are broadly categorized into three groups: multiple myeloma, which is the commonest; solitary plasmacytoma of bone; and extramedullary plasmacytoma.1,2

Diagnostic criteria for multiple myeloma have varied over time. According to the 2008 World Health Organization classification,3 a diagnosis of the present case was confirmed as symptomatic myeloma because the patient had M-protein in serum and urine, bone marrow plasma cells up to 36.5%, plasmacytoma on tissue biopsy and anaemia as a clinical complication. The patient did not have typical complications, such as skeletal destruction with osteolytic lesions, pathological fractures, bone pain, hypercalcaemia and renal insufficiency. Some patients with undiagnosed multiple myeloma may present with initial signs or symptoms in the jaw bones and oral cavity and a systemic work-up should be obtained early after diagnosis of the lesion to rule out the existence of systemic disease.2,47 In the present case, the laboratory examination was essential to differentiate solitary plasmacytoma of bone from multiple myeloma owing to a lack of characteristic clinical complications or end-organ/tissue damage, especially osteolytic lesion.

The radiographic features of multiple myeloma vary from normal to diffuse osteosclerosis; however, multiple radiolucent bone lesions are most common.1,8,9 Solitary plasmacytoma of the mandible also has various radiographic findings: “punched-out” appearance, ill-defined destructive radiolucencies and appearance of a multiloculated lesion.4,1014 In the present case, no additional osteolytic lesions were caused by multiple myeloma; however the left posterior mandible and ramal area were associated with plasmacytoma demonstrating ill-defined destructive radiolucencies. Early myeloma may not reveal observable changes on plain radiographs. Other imaging techniques show evidence of active myeloma in approximately 20% of patients with negative radiographs.15,16 The Durie/Salmon PLUS staging system includes new imaging techniques, such as MRI, whole-body FDG-PET scanning and whole-body CT (combined with PET directly or by fusion), offering anatomical and functional information.17 PET and PET/CT with 18F-FDG are insensitive to diffuse bone marrow infiltration; however, this technique may help to detect new non-suspected lesions overstaging the disease, with important implications in treatment, and to assess treatment response in solitary or multiple solid plasma cell tumours which have a high FDG uptake before treatment.18–25 To the best of our knowledge, the current case is the first report of solitary plasmacytoma of the mandible with an 18F-FDG PET/CT scan. The initial PET/CT scan confirmed that the lesion was solitary with a maximum standardized uptake value of 3.1. Follow-up PET/CT scans revealed decreased FDG uptake and decreased mass and the reappearance of the cortical outline on the left ramal area.

Differential diagnosis of a current panoramic image showing aggressive bone destruction and extensive soft-tissue mass included primary or metastatic malignant tumour. Various malignant conditions were considered owing to its location, such as malignant tumour of neural origin, histiocytoma, fibrosarcoma and rhabdomyosarcoma. However, histiocytoma and sarcoma arise typically in younger patients and there was no known primary lesion suggestive of metastatic lesion. Although CT images demonstrated a well-defined round mass centred on the left ramal area and a mild homogeneous enhancement pattern different from a malignant lesion, the possibility of malignant tumour could not be excluded because of the aggressive appearance of the lesion. On histological examination, a final diagnosis was confirmed as plasmacytoma.

The release of paracrine factors by myeloma leads to increasing bone demineralization and hypercalcaemia by activation of osteoclasts.26 Bisphosphonates inhibit bone resorption by being selectively taken up and adsorbed to mineral surfaces in bone, where they interfere with the action of the bone-resorbing osteoclasts.27 In the current case, the patient took zoledronic acid (Zometa®; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp, East Hanover, NJ) for preventing skeletal fractures from multiple myeloma. It is possible that residual osteoblasts of the left ramal area, despite severe initial bone loss, could induce bone formation because osteoclastic activity was suppressed by zoledronic acid.

In the case of advanced stage or symptomatic myeloma, melphalan–prednisone plus either thalidomide or bortexomib are the new standards in Europe for elderly patients.28 Thalidomide kills malignant plasma cells directly, and also has antiangiogenic properties and other effects on the bone marrow microenvironment that may synergize with chemotherapy to induce apoptosis.29,30 Cyclophosphamide, thalidomide and dexamethasone provide higher response rates than melphalan–prednisone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are ineligible for intensive therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation.31

An early diagnosis of solitary plasmacytoma of bone is essential to overall patient survival. It may represent the first manifestation of multiple myeloma, with conversion to multiple myeloma occurring in approximately 70% of cases at an average of 20.7 months after initial diagnosis.8,10,25,32 The 5-year survival rate of solitary plasmacytoma of bone is 60%; however, it goes down to 5.7% when progression to multiple lesions occurs.33 In the present case, we could not exclude the possibility of conversion from solitary plasmacytoma of bone to multiple myeloma. The swelling had persisted for 2 years at diagnosis, and laboratory analyses were also close to the initial stage rather than the typical findings of multiple myeloma, which generally show renal insufficiency and hypercalcaemia.

In conclusion, we have reported a case of multiple myeloma presenting as plasmacytoma showing an ill-defined osteolytic radiolucency on the left mandibular angle–ramus–condyle–coronoid process area as a first sign of the disease. No additional bony lesions were found in initial the 18FDG PET/CT scan and prominent bone formation was remarkable on both plain radiographs and an 18FDG PET/CT scan during chemotherapy.

References

  • 1.Mozaffari E, Mupparapu M, Otis L. Undiagnosed multiple myeloma causing extensive dental bleeding: report of a case and review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002; 94: 448–453 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Owotade F, Ugboko V, Ajike S, Salawu L, Amusa Y, Omole M. Head and neck manifestations of myeloma in Nigerians. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005; 34: 761–765 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.McKenna RW, Kyle RA, Kuehl WM, Grogan TM, Harris NL, Coupland RW. Plasma cell neoplasms. : Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Pileri SA, Stein H, et al. (eds). WHO classification of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. Lyon, France: IARC; 2008. pp. 200–213 [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Epstein JB, Voss NJ, Stevenson-Moore P. Maxillofacial manifestations of multiple myeloma. An unusual case and review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1984; 57: 267–271 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.González J, Elizondo J, Trull JM, De Torres I. Plasma-cell tumours of the condyle. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991; 29: 274–276 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lee SH, Huang JJ, Pan WL, Chan CP. Gingival mass as the primary manifestation of multiple myeloma: report of two cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996; 82: 75–79 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Elias HG, Scott J, Metheny L, Quereshy FA. Multiple myeloma presenting as mandibular ill-defined radiolucent lesion with numb chin syndrome: a case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67: 1991–1996 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Witt C, Borges AC, Klein K, Neumann HJ. Radiographic manifestations of multiple myeloma in the mandible: a retrospective study of 77 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997; 55: 450–453 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wood RE. Malignant Diseases of the Jaws. In: White SC, Pharoah MJ (eds). Oral radiology: principles and interpretation. 4th edn. St. Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Inc.; 2000. pp. 458–484 [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Shih LY, Dunn P, Leung WM, Chen WJ, Wang PN. Localised plasmacytomas in Taiwan: comparison between extramedullary plasmacytoma and solitary plasmacytoma of bone. Br J Cancer 1995; 71: 128–133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Di Micco P, Niglio A, Torella R, Di Micco B. Solitary plasmacytoma of the jaw occurring in an elderly woman affected by hepatitis C virus infection: a case report. Tumori 2002; 88: 420–423 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Canger EM, Celenk P, Alkan A, Günhan O. Mandibular involvement of solitary plasmocytoma: a case report. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2007; 12: E7–9 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Poggio CE. Plasmacytoma of the mandible associated with a dental implant failure: a clinical report. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18: 540–543 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Souza LN, Farias LC, Santos LA, Mesquita RA, Martelli H, Jr, De-Paula AM. Asymptomatic expansile lesion of the posterior mandible. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 103: 4–7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Durie BG, Waxman AD, D'Agnolo A, Williams CM. Whole-body (18)F-FDG PET identifies high-risk myeloma. J Nucl Med 2002; 43: 1457–1463 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Modic MT, Obuchowski N. Whole-body CT screening for cancer and coronary disease: does it pass the test? Cleve Clin J Med 2004; 71: 47–56 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Durie BG. The role of anatomic and functional staging in myeloma: description of Durie/Salmon plus staging system. Eur J Cancer 2006; 42: 1539–1543 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Schirrmeister H, Buck AK, Bergmann L, Reske SN, Bommer M. Positron emission tomography (PET) for staging of solitary plasmacytoma. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 2003; 18: 841–845 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Adam Z, Bolcak K, Stanicek J, Buchler T, Pour L, Krejci M, et al. Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in multiple myeloma, solitary plasmocytoma and monoclonal gammapathy of unknown significance. Neoplasma 2007; 54: 536–540 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nanni C, Rubello D, Zamagni E, Castellucci P, Ambrosini V, Montini G, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT in myeloma with presumed solitary plasmocytoma of bone. In Vivo 2008; 22: 513–517 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kim PJ, Hicks RJ, Wirth A, Ryan G, Seymour JF, Prince HM, et al. Impact of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography before and after definitive radiation therapy in patients with apparently solitary plasmacytoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009; 74: 740–746 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Baur-Melnyk A, Reiser MF. Multiple myeloma. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2009; 13: 111–119 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Delorme S, Baur-Melnyk A. Imaging in multiple myeloma. Eur J Radiol 2009; 70: 401–408 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sager S, Ergül N, Ciftci H, Cetin G, Güner SI, Cermik TF. The value of FDG PET/CT in the initial staging and bone marrow involvement of patients with multiple myeloma. Skeletal Radiol 2011; 40: 843–847 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Walker RC, Miceli MH, Jackson LJ. PET-CT Imaging in multiple myeloma, solitary plasmacytoma, and related plasma cell dyscrasias. In: Sheve P, Townsend DW (eds). Clinical PET-CT in radiology: integrated imaging in oncology book. New York, NY: Springer; 2011. pp. 293–312 [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Schirrmeister H, Buck AK, Bergmann L, Reske SN, Bommer M. Positron emission tomography (PET) for staging of solitary plasmacytoma. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 2003; 18: 841–845 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Russell RG. Bisphosphonates: The first 40 years. Bone 2011; 49: 2–19 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Harousseau JL, Dreyling M; ESMO., Guidelines Working Group Multiple myeloma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2010; 21(Suppl. 5)v155–157 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hideshima T, Chauhan D, Shima Y, Raje N, Davies FE, Tai YT, et al. Thalidomide and its analogs overcome drug resistance of human multiple myeloma cells to conventional therapy. Blood 2000; 96: 2943–2950 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Holstein SA, Tong H, Hohl RJ. Differential activities of thalidomide and isoprenoid biosynthetic pathway inhibitors in multiple myeloma cells. Leuk Res 2010; 34: 344–351 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Morgan GJ, Davies FE, Gregory WM, Russell NH, Bell SE, Szubert AJ, et al. Cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (CTD) as initial therapy for patients with multiple myeloma unsuitable for autologous transplantation. Blood 2011; 118: 1231–1238 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Pisano JJ, Coupland R, Chen SY, Miller AS. Plasmacytoma of the oral cavity and jaws: a clinicopathologic study of 13 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997; 83: 265–271 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Jeong JA, Seo GE, Song JH, Park SJ. Solitary plasma cell myeloma on anterior maxilla: a case report. J Korean Assoc Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 32: 77–80 [Google Scholar]

Articles from Dentomaxillofacial Radiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES