Skip to main content
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology logoLink to Dentomaxillofacial Radiology
. 2013 Mar;42(3):16128745. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/16128745

Congenital infiltrating lipomatosis of the face with exophytic temporomandibular joint ankylosis: a case report and review of the literature

S Sahai 1,*, S Rajan 1, N Singh 2, H Arora 1
PMCID: PMC3667539  PMID: 22241871

Abstract

Congenital infiltrating lipomatosis of the face (CIL-F) is a rare lipomatous lesion with diffuse fatty infiltration of tissues and hyperplasia of underlying bone. We report clinical and CT findings in an unusual case of CIL-F presenting with progressive hemifacial asymmetry, manifesting as severely restricted mouth opening owing to exophytic temporomandibular joint ankylosis. The role of imaging in diagnosis is presented with a review of the literature. Differential diagnosis of CIL-F and its exclusion as a cause of hemifacial hyperplasia are also discussed.

Keywords: facial hyperplasia, lipomatosis, temporomandibular joint, ankylosis, computed tomography

Introduction

Congenital infiltrating lipomatosis of the face (CIL-F) is a rare lipomatous lesion characterized by diffuse fatty infiltration of facial soft tissues and is usually seen in childhood. It was first described by Slavin et al in 1983.1 The lipomatous tissue can infiltrate facial muscles, soft tissues and bones to cause ipsilateral hyperplasia of the underlying facial skeleton, asymmetry of the mandible and even dental abnormalities.13 There is no sex predilection; patients have normal psychomotor development and aesthetics are often the primary concern.4,5 This condition may progress rapidly with extensive hyperplasia in childhood (up to and including 1 year of age) or as an indolent form with gradual hyperplasia where patients present for treatment in adulthood.6

The aetiopathogenesis of CIL-F is poorly understood.1,4,5 Possible aetiologies for the lipomatous change and infiltration include somatic mutation. Multipotential cells of embryogenic origin under the influence of hormones, trauma, chronic irradiation, muscle metaplasia or congenital cytomegalovirus infection could precipitate the somatic defect.711 This rare entity is classified as a subgroup of lipoma. Benign lipomas have five subgroups:8

  1. simple encapsulated lipoma

  2. lipoma variants such as angiomyolipoma

  3. hamartomatous lesions

  4. infiltrating or diffuse lipomatosis

  5. benign tumour of brown fat—hibernoma.

Histopathological features of CIL-F include adipose infiltration of adjacent muscle and soft tissue without malignant characteristics, absence of lipoblasts, fibrous elements, increased numbers of vessels with unifocally thickened muscular walls and increased numbers of nerve bundles of variable size with focal fibrosis.1

Bone changes in CIL-F include sclerosis and hyperplasia of the skull, cervical vertebrae, hemimandibular hyperplasia (including ramus, condylar process), accelerated dentoskeletal growth and zygomatic hyperplasia.2 These changes could be related to increased vascularity, periosteal irritation from overlying mass or regional mesenchymal malformation.1214 Table 1 shows patient data, age at presentation and bone involvement in published reports of CIL-F. This report details clinical and CT features in a case of CIL-F presenting with secondary temporomandibular joint (TMJ) ankylosis, where progressive hemifacial hyperplasia and limitation of mouth opening were undiagnosed prior to CT.

Table 1.

Bone involvement in published cases of congenital infiltrating lipomatosis of the face

Author Age at presentation Sex Clinical presentation Bone involvement Management
Bouletreau et al2 16 years F Left facial asymmetry Mandibular body, ramus, condylar process and left zygomatic bone Inferior mandibular border ostectomy, alveolar grafta
Rajeswaran et al4 11 years F Diffuse swelling right face Right frontal, orbital, zygomatic and maxillary bones Cosmetic (debulking) surgery
Heymans et al5 43 months F Soft, painless swelling right cheek None Vibroliposuction
Kang et al6 25 years M Right facial swelling Maxilla Soft tissue debulking, total parotidectomy and partial buccal fat, massetter resectionb
Haloi et al8 1 year 10 months—4 None NA
Ipsilateral regional macrodontiac
Chen et al9 16 months F Elastic non-tender left cheek mass Left zygoma and maxilla Debulking surgery with preservation of facial nerve
Salvatore et al15 37 years F Swelling right cheek, parotidomassetric and submandibular regions No signs of bone erosion Complete excision
Malik et al16 22 years M Diffuse soft swelling right cheek Right zygomatic arch, mandibular condyle and lateral pterygoid plate Surgical excision
Malik et al16 32 years M Soft swelling back of neck C2, C7 and posterior elements of cervical vertebrae NA
Kamal et al17 16 years F Left facial mass Zygomatic arch LeFort I, zygoma osteotomy
Kamal et al17 2 years M Left cheek mass None NA
Unal et al18 2 years F Soft mass left cheek None Debulking with facial nerve preservation
Pires Fraga et al19 2 years M Left hemifacial tumour None Partial and superficial (pre-parotid) removald
Current study 53 years F Progressive right facial asymmetry and exophytic right preauricular swelling Mandibular body, ramus, temporomandibular joint. Maxilla, zygomatic bone Debulking, right hemimandibulectomy

F, female; M, male; NA, not available.

a

6 interventions done over 10 years starting at 16 years.

b

Post-operative facial nerve palsy, ptosis of lower eyelid. Residual asymmetry corrected with liposuction.

c

Noted in one out of four cases.

d

Clinical signs of lesion growth at 3 month follow-up. Patient death 6 months post surgery owing to cardiopulmonary complications.

Case report

A 54-year-old female patient reported for CT of the face owing to progressive reduction of mouth opening and right hemifacial hyperplasia. Right facial asymmetry was reportedly present since birth. The patient history revealed surgery for correction of facial asymmetry (debulking and reshaping of the mandible) more than 2 decades previously, for which no surgical records were available.

Clinically, there was marked right hemifacial enlargement and asymmetry involving the middle and lower third of the face, from the right pre-auricular region to the mandibular midline and from the temporal to the submandibular region craniocaudally. The pre-auricular swelling was exophytic hard causing severely restricted mouth opening. No vascular blanching, cutaneous nevi or stigmata were noted (Figure 1a,b).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(a) Extraoral profile view of right facial enlargement. (b) Soft tissue rendered three-dimensional volumetric reconstruction with frontal view of right facial asymmetry and large preauricular swelling

CT scan of the face using a SOMATOM Sensation 64 scanner (Siemens AG, Erlangen, Germany) at 55 mAs, 120 kV, revealed hyperplasia of subcutaneous fat on the right side of the face (frontal, temporal, maxillomandibular regions) and the right buccal pad of fat. Muscular fatty infiltration with increased bulk was seen in the right platysma, masseter, temporalis, medial-lateral pterygoid and anterior belly of the digastric muscles along with the intrinsic muscles of the right oral tongue (Figure 2a,b). Fatty infiltration was also seen in the right parotid and submandibular glands. There was thickening of the right greater wing of the sphenoid without definite widening of the skull base foramina.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(a) Axial CT image (soft-tissue algorithm) at the level of the mid-maxillary alveolus shows hyperplastic subcutaneous fat, diffuse fatty infiltration in right buccal, massetric, parotid and parapharyngeal spaces (arrows). (b) Coronal CT image (soft-tissue algorithm) shows hyperplasia and fatty infiltration of right parotid and submandibular glands (arrows), muscular fatty infiltration in right oral tongue (arrowhead)

There was hyperplasia of the right condylar process, including the bony components (condylar head, glenoid fossa, articular eminence) of the right TMJ. Exophytic new bone formation, osteophytosis and sclerotic remodeling was seen on the lateral aspect of the right TMJ. Joint articulation was noted where the hyperplastic bones of the TMJ apposed each other, forming a functional articular surface. Bony ankylosis was seen laterally to the right TMJ (extra-articular ankylosis) where the exophytic bone mass was contiguous from the temporal to the condylar components of the right TMJ. Thickening of the right mandibular ramus with diffuse trabecular sclerosis and loss of the marrow architecture was also seen (Figures 3a–c and 4) with fatty infiltration into the proximal mandibular canal.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(a) Axial CT image (bone algorithm) at the level of the pterygoid plates shows hyperplastic, deformed right condylar head (short arrow) and new bone formation on lateral aspect of right temporomandibular joint (TMJ) (long arrows). (b) Coronal CT image (bone algorithm) shows hyperplastic condylar head and glenoid fossa (long arrows) with extra-articular bony ankylosis of right TMJ (short arrow). Articular surface irregularity and reduced right TMJ space are also seen (arrowheads). (c) Sagittal CT image (bone algorithm) through mid-right TMJ reveals degenerative changes (i.e. erosion and subarticular cystic change) in the right condylar head (small arrows). Note hypodensity of cancellous bone of condylar head and loss of marrow architecture owing to fatty infiltration (arrowheads)

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Three-dimensional volumetric reconstruction image shows malaligned mandibular teeth and exophytic right preauricular bony mass

No obvious abnormality was seen in the brain parenchyma, the rest of the muscles, the bones of head and neck and the contents of the visceral spaces of the suprahyoid neck.

Surgical treatment constituted a submandibular neck crease incision followed by mandibular exposure via subperiosteal dissection. Right hemimandibulectomy was performed with release of the extra-articular TMJ ankylosis (Figure 5). Histopathological examination showed non-encapsulated mature adipocytes infiltrating adjacent muscles and soft tissues.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Intraoperative photograph shows diffuse fat infiltration

Discussion

Diffuse fatty (−60 HU to −120 HU) infiltration and hyperplasia of multiple bones of the craniofacial skeleton noted in this case represent typical CT features of CIL-F.1,5,8,16 The inhomogenous character of fatty infiltration could be due to intervening fibrous elements.4 Fat infiltration into the right mandibular canal was seen on CT and also on histopathological examination of the resected mandible.

Articular surface irregularity and evidence of right TMJ remodelling was seen with CT (Figure 3a). However, the severely restricted mouth opening was seen owing to the extra-articular ankylosis and exophytic new bone formation on the lateral aspect of the joint (Figures 3b,c and 4). The findings appear consistent with Type-II TMJ ankylosis.20 Restriction of movement at adjacent joints owing to bone overgrowth has been reported;16 however, severe restriction of mouth opening owing to TMJ involvement is an unusual manifestation of CIL-F. Bone involvement in CIL-F increases with age (Table 1); therefore, CT is a more relevant primary investigation for older patients as it permits composite radiological descriptions of soft tissue and bony changes.

MRI is useful to confirm the predominantly fatty nature of the condition, with the exclusion of lymphatic/vascular malformations.8 High signal intensity (isointense to fat) of the lesion on T1 and T2 weighted images (hypointense on fat suppressed images) in young patients is diagnostic in the presence of typical clinical features, thus eliminating need for biopsy.4,21 Facial nerve encasement and intracranial/cerebral abnormalities (ipsilateral hemimegalencephaly, asymmetric ventricular–sylvian fissure dilatation, arachnoid cyst, cerebellopontine angle lipoma) can also be seen on MRI.2224 However, MRI features are not always reliable to differentiate CIL-F from well-differentiated liposarcomas.15 MRI was not considered in this case owing to absence of neurological symptoms, presence of typical CT features of CIL-F without intracranial abnormalities and presence of massive extra-articular TMJ ankylosis.

Differential diagnosis of CIL-F includes lymphatic/vascular malformations, lipomas (intermuscular/intramuscular, angiolipomas/fibrolipomas, liposarcoma and lipoblastomatosis) and congenital overgrowth syndromes causing progressive hemifacial hyperplasia (HH), as seen in CIL-F.9,17,19,21 Overgrowth of one or more mesodermal elements (vascular Klippel–Trenaunay–Weber syndrome, neural neurofibromatosis, osseous–fibrous dysplasia or varied tissues Proteus syndrome) causes HH, similar to the fatty infiltration in CIL-F.25 Clinical and imaging evaluation will usually permit exclusion of differentials; however, differentiation from lipoblastomatosis and liposarcoma may require histopathology.8 Table 2 presents comparative features of CIL-F with some congenital overgrowth syndromes associated with HH.

Table 2.

Comparative features of congenital overgrowth syndromes causing hemifacial hypertrophy and congenital infiltrating lipomatosis of the face (CIL-F)

Condition Neurofibromatosis26,27 Klippel–Trenaunay–Weber syndrome28 Proteus syndrome29,30 Fibrous dysplasia (McCune–Albright syndrome)31,32 CIL-F1,3,4,17,21
Origin Neural Vascular Mixed Osseous Fat
Clinical features Smooth café-au-lait spots Soft tissue hypertrophy of extremity Epidermal nevi Irregular café-au-lait spots Increased density of facial hair on affected side
Macrodactyly Hemimacroglossia
Neurofibromas Venous malformations Scoliosis Precocious puberty Ptosis of upper lip, enlarged lower lip
Lisch nodules Capillary haemangiomas Soft tissue/bony overgrowth. Pitiutary adenoma Early eruption of deciduous permanent teeth
Gracile bones/ribs Limb overgrowth Unilateral precocious dental development Hyperthyroidism Regional macrodontia
CT features Hypodense soft tissue with homogeneous enhancement Hypodense/mildly hyperdense soft tissue Distortion of skeletal features with rapid progression Osseous expansion Fatty infiltration Poorly defined margins
Cystic: fluid-like density
Calcified phleboliths Fatty infiltraton of muscles Mature: ground-glass density Hypertrophy of underlying facial skeleton
Nodular enhancement Vascular malformations Poorly defined peripheral sclerosis
MRI features Low signal intensity on T1WI Marked T2 hyperintensity Calvarial thickening Intermediate to low signal on T1WI Diffuse fatty infiltration with T1, T2 hyperintensity
outer table defects
T2 hyperintensity with central hypointensity (target sign) Phleboliths Focal fatty infiltration Intermediate to high signal on T2WI Hypointensity on fat-suppressed images
Homogeneous enhancement Peripheral nodular enhancement Asymmetric fatty masses in suprahyoid neck Heterogeneous contrast enhancement

T1WI, T1 weighted images; T2WI, T2 weighted images.

HH associated with CIL-F has been described previously;2,6 striking similarities between the two conditions prompted Macmillan et al33 to suggest that they are the same clinical entity. In their review of the literature on HH since 1881, Kang et al6 found three cases of HH associated with CIL-F prior to the report by Slavin et al1 and remarked that this rare association might have been under-reported previously. A possible example is a case of developmental hemifacial enlargement (hyperplasia) associated with a combination of lipoma and lipomatosis.34

CIL-F has a reported18 post-resection recurrence rate of 62.5% with an average of 3 debulking procedures per patient (Kang et al6). Delayed surgical resection is recommended to prevent facial nerve damage and reduce the number of debulking procedures.35

Conclusion

CIL-F may be considered an unlikely differential of facial hemihyperplasia. Typical CT/MRI findings are diagnostic. The osseous overgrowth itself or in combination with previous surgical exploration has a potential to cause exophytic bone formation and TMJ ankylosis. Pre-operative recognition is essential for surgical management to not only release the ankylosis but also debulk the infiltrating lipomatosis in view of high recurrence rates.

References

  • 1.Slavin SA, Baker DC, McCarthy JG, Muffarij A. Congenital infiltrating lipomatosis of the face: clinicopathologic evaluation and treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg 1983; 72: 158–164 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bouletreau P, Breton P, Freidel M. Congenital infiltrating lipomatosis of the face: case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000; 58: 807–810 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rowe NH. Hemifacial hypertrophy. Review of the literature and addition of four cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1962; 15: 572–587 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rajeswaran R, Murthy J, Chandrasekharan A, Joseph S. Case report: congenital infiltrating lipomatosis of face. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2008; 18: 306–309 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Heymans O, Ronsmans C. Congenital infiltrating lipomatosis of the face. Eur J Plast Surg 2005; 28: 186–189 [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kang N, Ross D, Harrison D. Unilateral hypertrophy of the face associated with infiltrating lipomatosis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998; 56: 885–887 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Görken C, Alper M, Bilkay U, Çelik N, Songür E. Congenital infiltrating lipomatosis of the face. J Craniofac Surg 1999; 10: 365–368 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Haloi AK, Ditchfield M, Penington A, Phillips R. Facial infiltrative lipomatosis. Pediatr Radiol 2006; 36: 1159–1162 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chen CM, Lo LJ, Wong HF. Congenital infiltrating lipomatosis of the face: case report and literature review. Chang Gung Med J 2002; 25: 194–200 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Donati L, Candiani P, Grappolini S, Klinger M, Signorini M. Congenital infiltrating lipomatosis of the face related to cytomegalovirus infection. Br J Plast Surg 1990; 43: 124–126 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Patel RV, Gondalia JS. Congenital infiltrating lipomatosis of the face. Br J Plast Surg 1991:44: 157–158 (letter) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lachman RS, Finklestein J, Mehringer CM, Maenza R. Congenital agressive lipomatosis. Skeletal Radiol 1983; 9: 248–254 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bollinger B. Bone changes in diffuse congenital lipomatosis. Neuroradiology 1987; 29: 104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wylie EJ, Kendall B. Cranio-vertebral bony changes in a case of congenital lipomatosis. Neuroradiology 1989; 31: 352–353 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Salvatore C, Antonio B, Del Vecchio W, Lanza A, Tartaro G, Giuseppe C. Giant infiltrating lipoma of the face: CT and MR imaging findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003; 24: 283–286 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Malik A, Jagmohan P, Thukral BB, Khanna G, Rajni Congenital infiltrating lipomatosis of the face and neck. Acta Radiol 2004; 45: 556–560 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kamal D, Breton P, Bouletreau P. Congenital infiltrating lipomatosis of the face: report of three cases and review of the literature. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2010; 38: 610–614 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Unal S, Demirkan F, Arslan E, Cinel L. Infiltrating lipomatosis of the face: a case report and review of the literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003; 61: 1098–1101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pires Fraga MF, Mello D, Jorge D, Perin LF, Helene A. Congenital infiltrating lipomatosis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009; 62: e561–e564 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.El-Hakim IE, Metwalli SA. Imaging of temporomandibular joint ankylosis. A new radiographic classification. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002; 31: 19–23 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Padwa BL, Mulliken JB. Facial infiltrating lipomatosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 108: 1544–54 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Aydingöz U, Emir S, Karli-Oğuz K, Köse G, Büyükpamukçu M. Congenital infiltrating lipomatosis of the face with ipsilateral hemimegalencephaly. Pediatr Radiol 2002; 32: 106–109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cecilia P, Fabio T, Gianni R, Massimo M, Giuseppe S. Encephalocraniocutaneous lipomatosis: complete neurological evaluation and follow-up of two cases. ANJR Am J Neuroradiol 1999; 20: 173–176 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.De Rosa G, Cozzolino A, Guarino M, Giardino C. Congenital infiltrating lipomatosis of the face: report of cases and review of the literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1987; 45: 879–883 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Shafer WG, Hine MK, Levy BM. A textbook of oral pathology. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 1983. pp 8–9 [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Aribandi M, Wood WE, Elston DM, Weiss DL. CT features of plexiform neurofibroma of the submandibular gland. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006; 27: 126–128 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lin J, Martel W. Cross-sectional imaging of peripheral nerve sheath tumors: characteristic signs on CT, MR imaging, and sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176: 75–82 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Auyeung KM, Lee SF, Chan YL. Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome presenting in a child with vascular malformation. J HK Coll Radiol 2002; 5: 227–229 [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Korbmacher H, Tietke M, Rother U, Kahl-Nieke B. Dentomaxillofacial imaging in Proteus syndrome. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2005; 34: 251–255 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Jamis-Dow CA, Turner J, Biesecker LG, Choyke PL. Radiologic manifestations of Proteus syndrome. Radiographics 2004; 24: 1051–1068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.MacDonald-Jankowski DS, Yeung R, Li TK, Lee KM. Computed tomography of fibrous dysplasia. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004; 33: 114–118 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Fitzpatrick KA, Taljanovic MS, Speer DP, Graham AR, Jacobson JA, Barnes GR, et al. Imaging findings of fibrous dysplasia with histopathologic and intraoperative correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 182: 1389–1398 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Macmillan AR, Oliver AJ, Reade PC, Marshall DR. Regional macrodontia and regional bony enlargement associated with congenital infiltrating lipomatosis of the face presenting as unilateral facial hyperplasia. Brief review and case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990; 19: 283–286 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sugiyama M, Tanaka E, Ogawa I, Ishibashi R, Naito K, Ishikawa T. Magnetic resonance imaging in hemifacial hyperplasia. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2001; 30: 235–238 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Van Wingerden JJ, Erlank JD, Becker JH. Liposuction for congenital infiltrating lipomatosis of the face. Plast Reconstr Surg 1988; 81: 989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Dentomaxillofacial Radiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES