Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Oct 9.
Published in final edited form as: Circulation. 2012 Sep 4;126(15):1821–1827. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.098061

Table 2.

Difference in BMI per 10 points of the weighted GRS according to average hours of TV watching*

Average hours of TV watching per week
P for Interaction
0-1 2-5 6-20 21-40 ≥41
Women
 n 439 1634 4003 1198 185
GRS (range) 18.9-43.4 16.6-42.3 14.8-43.3 16.7-42.3 17.9-39.9
 β (SE)
 Model 1 1.1 (0.6) 1.3 (0.3) 1.7 (0.2) 1.6 (0.4) 3.2 (1.2) 0.05
 Model 2§ 1.1 (0.6) 1.2 (0.3) 1.7 (0.2) 1.6 (0.4) 3.0 (1.1) 0.05
Men
 n 519 2231 1301 488 25
GRS (range) 16.9-40.4 16.8-41.9 16.0-40.6 19.5-40.6 21.1-37.3
 β (SE)
 Model 1 0.7 (0.4) 0.7 (0.2) 1.0 (0.2) 1.3 (0.5) 3.9 (2.1) 0.04
 Model 2§ 0.7 (0.4) 0.7 (0.2) 1.0 (0.2) 1.3 (0.5) 3.9 (2.2) 0.05
Pooled β (SE)
 Model 1 0.8 (0.4) 0.8 (0.2) 1.4 (0.2) 1.5 (0.3) 3.4 (1.0) 0.001
 Model 2§ 0.8 (0.4) 0.8 (0.2) 1.4 (0.2) 1.5 (0.3) 3.2 (1.0) 0.001
*

Data are based on first 2 year of follow-up after the assessment of hours spent on TV watching in women (1992-1994) and men (1988-1990).

Difference in BMI (kg/m2) per 10 points of the weighted GRS.

Adjusted for age, genotype data source and disease status.

§

Further adjusted for physical activity, smoking, alcohol intake, menopausal status (women only) and total energy intake.

Results were pooled between women and men by inverse-variance–weighted, fixed-effects meta-analyses.