Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section F: Structural Biology and Crystallization Communications logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section F: Structural Biology and Crystallization Communications
. 2013 May 25;69(Pt 6):679–682. doi: 10.1107/S1744309113012906

Purification, crystallization and preliminary X-ray crystallographic studies of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA gyrase ATPase domain

Mélanie Roué a,b, Alka Agrawal c, Craig Volker d, Danuta Mossakowska c, Claudine Mayer a,b,*, Benjamin D Bax c
PMCID: PMC3668594  PMID: 23722853

The ATPase domain of M. tuberculosis DNA gyrase was crystallized using hanging-drop vapour diffusion. The crystals belonged to space groups P1 and P21. Diffraction data were collected to resolutions of 2.9 and 3.3 Å, respectively.

Keywords: Mycobacterium tuberculosis, type II topoisomerase, DNA gyrase, ATPase domain

Abstract

Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA gyrase, a nanomachine involved in the regulation of DNA topology, is the only type II topoisomerase present in this organism and hence is the sole target of fluoroquinolones in the treatment of tuberculosis. The ATPase domain provides the energy required for catalysis by ATP hydrolysis. Two constructs corresponding to this 43 kDa domain, Mtb-GyrB47C1 and Mtb-GyrB47C2, have been overproduced, purified and crystallized. Diffraction data were collected from three crystal forms. The crystals belonged to space groups P1 and P21 and diffracted to resolutions of 2.9 and 3.3 Å, respectively.

1. Introduction  

DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV are type II topoisomerases that are found in almost all bacteria. These essential macromolecular assemblies are involved in the manipulation of DNA topology during replication, transcription and recombination. They maintain DNA topology by cleaving and religating DNA double-strand breaks (Champoux, 2001). DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV are structurally and mechanistically related, but have acquired distinct bio­logical functions during evolution (Champoux, 2001). DNA gyrase is unique in introducing negative supercoils and facilitates DNA unwinding at replication forks, and topoisomerase IV has a special­ized function in mediating the decatenation of interlocked daughter chromosomes (Champoux, 2001; Levine et al., 1998).

Bacterial type II topoisomerases are heterotetrameric enzymes assembled from two subunits (A and B). Each subunit consists of two domains: the breakage-reunion (BRD) and the C-terminal (CTD) domains for the A subunit, and the ATPase and the Toprim domains for the B subunit (Schoeffler & Berger, 2008). DNA breakage occurs at the catalytic reaction core formed by the BRD and Toprim domains. The energy required for catalysis is provided by ATP hydrolysis in the ATPase domain. Fluoroquinolone antibiotics block the catalytic core (Mayer & Aubry, 2012), whereas the ATPase domain is the target of other classes of drugs such as aminocoumarins (Lewis et al., 1996).

In Mycobacterium tuberculosis, DNA gyrase is the single type II topoisomerase and therefore the sole type II topoisomerase that ensures the regulation of DNA superhelical density (Cole et al., 1998); it is also the sole target of the fluoroquinolones, which are key antibiotics in the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis. As a result, the M. tuberculosis enzyme exhibits a different activity spectrum compared with other DNA gyrases, e.g. it supercoils DNA with efficiency comparable to that of other DNA gyrases, but shows enhanced relaxation, DNA-cleavage and decatenation activities (Aubry et al., 2006). In order to establish the molecular basis of the specificities of M. tuberculosis DNA gyrase, we solved the structures of the GyrB Toprim domain, the GyrA BRD domain and the GyrA CTD domain (Piton et al., 2009, 2010; Darmon et al., 2012).

To provide further structural data with regard to the specificities of M. tuberculosis DNA gyrase and to facilitate the discovery of new antituberculous agents, we have investigated the role of the ATPase domain, which possesses a specific insertion of 32 amino acids that is present only in mycobacteria and other Corynebacteriae. The M. tuberculosis GyrB ATPase domain was expressed, purified and crystallized independently in two laboratories. Here, we report the preliminary crystallographic analyses obtained from three crystal forms.

2. Materials and methods  

2.1. Cloning, protein production and purification  

Two constructs (Mtb-GyrB47C1 and Mtb-GyrB47C2) of the gene encoding the M. tuberculosis DNA gyrase ATPase domain (residues 1–427 of subunit B) were independently cloned and expressed in two laboratories (GlaxoSmithKline, UK, and the Pasteur Institute, Paris). At GlaxoSmithKline, full-length M. tuberculosis gyrase B (accession No. CAA55486.1) was cloned by PCR from genomic DNA strain H37Rv provided by GlaxoSmithKline (Tres Cantos, Spain) using primers a and b (Table 1); it was subcloned into pET-20b (Novagen) cleaved with BamHI and XhoI, and contained an N-terminal six-histidine tag and a PreScission protease cleavage site to make pET-TBgyrBFL3His. The construct encoding the ATPase domain of gyrase B (Mtb-GyrB47C1) was obtained by PCR of the full-length clone using primers c and d (Table 1). PCR products were subcloned into pET-20b (Novagen) cleaved with BamHI and XhoI and contained an N-terminal six-histidine tag and a PreScission protease cleavage site.

Table 1. Primers used for cloning.

Construct Primers (5′–3′)
pET-TBgyrBFL3His a AGATCTGTGGCTGCCCAGAAAAAGAAGGCCCAAG
pET-TBgyrBFL3His b GAAGGCCCAAG CTCGAGTTAGACATCCAGGAACCGAACATC
Mtb-GyrB47C1 c AGATCTGTGGCTGCCCAGAAAAAGAAGGCCCAAG
Mtb-GyrB47C1 d CTCGAGTTACACCAACTCTCGTGCCTTACGTGC
Mtb-GyrB47C2 e GACGACGACAAGATGGCTGCCCAGAAAAAGAAGGCC
Mtb-GyrB47C2 f CCGGTTACACCAACTCTCGTGCCTTACG

Mtb-GyrB47C2 was obtained by PCR from full-length DNA gyrase subunit B (Aubry et al., 2006) using primers e and f (Table 1) which each include a ligation-independent cloning sequence (bold). The amplified product was ligated into the vector pRSF-2 Ek-LIC (Novagen, USA) after being treated with LIC-qualified T4 DNA polymerase according to the manufacturer’s instructions. This construct contains an additional hexahistidine tag at the N-terminus followed by an enterokinase cleavage site. The two recombinant plasmids, pET-20b/Mtb-GyrB47C1 and pRSF-2 Ek-LIC/Mtb-GyrB47C2, were transformed into Escherichia coli strain BL21(DE3)pLysS (Novagen).

Cells freshly transformed with pET-20b/Mtb-GyrB47C1 were grown overnight at 303 K in LB medium containing 100 µg ml−1 ampicillin, 34 µg ml−1 chloramphenicol and 1% glucose. The culture was diluted 1:10 into 5 l similar broth (without glucose), equilibrated for 30 min at 303 K and induced overnight at 303 K with a final isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) concentration of 0.5 mM. Following harvesting, the cell pellet was resuspended in 50 mM Tris–HCl pH 8, 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 1 mg ml−1 lysozyme, 1 µg ml−1 each of pepstatin A, bestatin, leupeptin and aprotinin, and then sonicated on ice and centrifuged at 30 000g. The soluble fraction was purified on a 50 ml Ni–NTA column (Qiagen) with a 0–500 mM imidazole step gradient in lysis buffer without lysozyme. The protein was buffer-exchanged into 50 mM Tris–HCl pH 8, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and 2 U PreScission protease per 100 µg protein were added overnight. The protease was removed with glutathione Sepharose (the protease is GST-tagged), and any uncleaved protein was removed by adsorption to Ni–NTA at 300 mM NaCl. The conductivity was reduced to <10 mS by dilution and the protein was purified over a 20 ml SourceQ ion-exchange column (GE Healthcare). Peak fractions were pooled, concentrated and applied onto a 500 ml Superdex 200 column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated in 20 mM Tris–HCl pH 8, 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM EDTA. The protein was concentrated to 6 mg ml−1; it was >95% pure as judged by Coomassie staining and its identity was confirmed by mass spectrometry and N-terminal sequencing. The final protein contains five extra residues at the N-­terminus (GPLGS prior to Val1) with a total molecular weight of 46.7 kDa.

Cells freshly transformed with pRSF-2 Ek-LIC/Mtb-GyrB47C2 were grown at 310 K in LB medium containing 50 µg ml−1 kanamycin and 40 µg ml−1 chloramphenicol. At an OD600 of 0.6, IPTG was added to a final concentration of 1 mM and the cells were grown at 310 K for 4 h. Following harvesting, bacteria were resuspended in 50 mM Tris pH 8.0, 500 mM NaCl, 10 mM imidazole and lysed by sonication on ice. After centrifugation at 18 000g for 1 h at 277 K, the supernatant was loaded onto a Ni2+-chelating HisTrap HP column (GE Healthcare) and the 6His-Mtb-GyrB47C2 protein was eluted with 50 mM Tris pH 8.0, 500 mM NaCl, 500 mM imidazole. After dialysis overnight at 277 K against 50 mM Tris pH 8.0 and 50 mM NaCl, the 6His-Mtb-GyrB47C2 protein was concentrated at 277 K using Amicon Ultra 10K (Millipore). To remove the His tag, the 6His-Mtb-GyrB47C2 protein was cleaved overnight at 277 K by entero­kinase at a molar ratio of 1:100. Any uncleaved protein was removed by adsorption to a Ni2+-chelating HisTrap HP column pre-equilibrated in 50 mM Tris pH 8.0, 500 mM NaCl, 10 mM imidazole. The flowthrough containing Mtb-GyrB47C2 was dialysed overnight at 277 K against 50 mM Tris pH 8.0, 50 mM NaCl and was concentrated at 277 K using Amicon Ultra 10K (Millipore). The concentrated Mtb-GyrB47C2 protein was purified further by size-exclusion chromatography on a Superdex 75 10/30 column (GE Healthcare) pre-equilibrated with 50 mM Tris pH 8.0, NaCl 50 mM. Alternatively, the 6His-Mtb-GyrB47C2 was purified according to the same protocol but without the His-tag cleavage step. The purified proteins were concentrated to 15 mg ml−1 in size-exclusion buffer using Amicon Ultra 10K (Millipore). The purity of the proteins was examined by 12% SDS–PAGE and determined to be >95% pure. The final 6His-Mtb-GyrB47C2 protein contains 14 extra residues at the N-terminus whereas the final Mtb-GyrB47C2 starts at codon 1 (valine) and contains 427 amino acids with a molecular weight of 46.3 kDa.

2.2. Crystallization and data collection  

Crystallization screens on the purified Mtb-GyrB47C1 construct at 12 mg ml−1 were run on protein either lacking ligand or in the presence of 5 mM MgCl2 plus either 1 mM AMPPNP, 1 mM novobiocin (a coumarin) or 1 mM GR122222X (a cyclothialidine). Crystals were only obtained in the presence of AMPPNP and GR122222X. Crystals grown in the presence of GR122222X in 0.1 M bis-tris pH 5.5–6.5, 20% PEG 3350 were not well ordered and failed to diffract beyond 4 Å resolution. Crystals with AMPPNP were obtained in a variety of conditions, but initially all crystals tested occurred in a P1 cell which had 16 subunits in the asymmetric unit. Analysis of the data sets with phenix.xtriage (Adams et al., 2010) gave no signs of twinning or a lower symmetry cell. The best data set obtained for this P1(16) crystal form, collected on beamline ID14-4 at the ESRF, is shown in Table 2 (crystal grown from 0.1 M Tris pH 8.5, 0.2 M NaCl, 25% PEG 3350). After rescreening crystallization conditions, investigating many different crystallization parameters and testing many crystals, a second crystal form was found. This was again in space group P1, with eight subunits in the asymmetric unit. The best data set we obtained from this P1(8) crystal form was an anisotropic data set to 2.95 Å resolution (Table 2); the crystal was grown in 0.1 M Tris pH 8.5, 0.2 M MgCl2, 20% PEG 8000. Data on the AMPPNP crystals were processed and scaled with DENZO and SCALEPACK (Otwinowski et al., 2003).

Table 2. Data-collection statistics.

Values in parentheses are for the outermost shell.

  Mtb-GyrB47C1 Mtb-GyrB47C1 Mtb-GyrB47C2
Beamline ID23-1, ESRF ID23-1, ESRF PX-1, SOLEIL
Wavelength (Å) 0.97955 0.97855 0.91942
Resolution range (Å) 40–2.95 (3.0–2.95) 25–2.9 (2.95–2.9) 50–3.3 (3.5–3.3)
Space group P1 P1 P21
Unit-cell parameters (Å, °) a = 71.9, b = 97.8, c = 138.1, α = 108.2, β = 105.2, γ = 91.0 a = 101.4, b = 138.2, c = 147.7, α = 105.3, β = 92.3, γ = 107.2 a = 78.6, b = 171.9, c = 109.2, β = 110.2
No. of unique reflections 64548 (3266) 159199 (7913) 41603 (6419)
Mutiplicity 1.7 (1.6) 1.9 (1.9) 3.8 (3.7)
Completeness (%) 84.5 (86.2) 98.3 (97.7) 98.7 (95.0)
Molecules per asymmetric unit 8 16 6
V M3 Da−1) (Matthews, 1968) 2.2 2.5 2.3
Solvent content (%) 44.4 51.4 46.8
I/σ(I)〉 10.8 (1.9) 14.1 (1.9) 16.3 (2.4)
R merge (%) 7.9 (27.2) 5.3 (42.2) 5.9 (56.9)

R merge = Inline graphic Inline graphic, where Ii(hkl) is the intensity of an individual reflection and 〈I(hkl)〉 is its mean value.

Initial crystallization screening of Mtb-GyrB47C2 (10 mg ml−1) was performed on a Mosquito robot (TTP LabTech) using several commercial screening kits (600 conditions). Preliminary results were obtained only in the presence of AMPPCP (5 mM) with 15% PEG 1500 as precipitant (Fig. 1). This condition was further screened and resulted in urchin-shaped crystals that did not diffract beyond 7 Å. Using the Additive Screen (Hampton Research) and extensive optimization of the crystallization conditions, the best diffracting crystals were grown by the hanging-drop vapour-diffusion method against 24% PEG 1500, 0.1 M MES pH 6.5, 5 mM MgCl2, 1.2% myo-inositol (Fig. 1). After successive soaking in cryoprotectant solutions consisting of mother liquor with increasing glycerol contents (30% final), crystals were flash-cooled in liquid nitrogen. X-ray diffraction data were collected on beamline PROXIMA-1 (PX-1) at the SOLEIL synchrotron (Fig. 2). The crystals belonged to space group P21 with unit-cell parameters a = 78.6, b = 171.9, c = 109.2 Å, β = 110.2°, and contained six monomers in the asymmetric unit. Data were processed with XDS (Kabsch, 2010) and scaled with SCALA from the CCP4 suite (Winn et al., 2011). Processing statistics are summarized in Table 2.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Crystals of the Mtb-GyrB47C2 construct. (a) Initial screening resulting in urchin-shaped crystals. (b) Crystals obtained using the Additive Screen.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Diffraction pattern obtained on beamline PROXIMA-1 (SOLEIL, Saint-Aubin) from optimized crystals of the Mtb-GyrB47C2 construct.

Molecular replacement was performed with Phaser (Storoni et al., 2004). For the Mtb-GyrB47C1 structure, the 43 kDa E. coli DNA gyrase ATPase domain (40% amino-acid identity) was used as the search model (PDB entry 1ei1; Brino et al., 2000). The first round of refinement was performed with REFMAC (Murshudov et al., 2011) using strict non-crystallographic symmetry for the GHKL and transducer subdomains. For the Mtb-GyrB47C2 structure, using the 43 kDa E. coli ATPase domain as search model did not give any results. Phases could be obtained using the GHKL and transducer sub­domains of a monomer of the preliminary refined Mtb-GyrB47C1 as the search model.

3. Results and discussion  

Two constructs for the ATPase domain of M. tuberculosis H37Rv GyrB, Mtb-GyrB47C1 and Mtb-GyrB47C2, were independently cloned and expressed in two laboratories (GlaxoSmithKline, UK, and the Pasteur Institute, Paris). The same ends of the domain (residues 1–427) were identified in both laboratories and the proteins are identical apart from having different N-terminal tags. Several start sites have been reported for M. tuberculosis GyrB (reviewed in Maruri et al., 2012) resulting in four different numbering schemes used throughout the literature. Analyses at GlaxoSmithKline suggested that the start site reported for M. smegmatis GyrB (Revel-Viravau et al., 1996), which has 80% amino-acid identity with M. tuberculosis GyrB, is most likely correct. This start site is 40 residues downstream of the longest reported start site and starts at a GTG codon (valine), which is not uncommon in mycobacteria (Jacobs et al., 2002). This was also identified as the start site at the Pasteur Institute and we use the new consensus numbering system for M. tuberculosis GyrB (Maruri et al., 2012).

High-throughput crystallization screenings were first performed on both constructs. Mtb-GyrB47C1 and Mtb-GyrB47C2 crystallized only in the presence of an ATP analogue (AMPPNP and AMPPCP, respectively). Two crystal forms were obtained for Mtb-GyrB47C1 in space group P1 with 16 and eight molecules in the asymmetric unit. The structure could be determined by molecular replacement with the structure of the E. coli GyrB ATPase domain using the P1(8) diffraction data. Surprisingly, in the case of Mtb-GyrB47C2, molecular replacement using the E. coli GyrB ATPase domain as the starting model gave no solution. In contrast, phases could be determined using the two ATPase subdomains, the GHKL and the transducer, as templates, revealing that the structures of Mtb-GyrB47C1 and Mtb-GyrB47C2 are in a different conformational state. Structural details will be described in a separate paper.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Ahmed Haouz from the Crystallogenesis Platform at the Institut Pasteur, members of the Biological Reagents and Assay Development department within GlaxoSmithKline and the local contact of the beamlines PROXIMA-1 at SOLEIL, Saint-Aubin and ID23-1 at the ESRF, Grenoble. This work was supported by grants from Région Ile-de-France and AA was funded by a National Science Foundation International Research Fellowship (INT-0202606). We thank Stéphanie Petrella and Alexandra Aubry for helpful discussion.

References

  1. Adams, P. D. et al (2010). Acta Cryst. D66, 213–221.
  2. Aubry, A., Fisher, L. M., Jarlier, V. & Cambau, E. (2006). Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 348, 158–165. [DOI] [PubMed]
  3. Brino, L., Urzhumtsev, A., Mousli, M., Bronner, C., Mitschler, A., Oudet, P. & Moras, D. (2000). J. Biol. Chem. 275, 9468–9475. [DOI] [PubMed]
  4. Champoux, J. J. (2001). Annu. Rev. Biochem. 70, 369–413. [DOI] [PubMed]
  5. Cole, S. T. et al. (1998). Nature (London), 393, 515–516.
  6. Darmon, A., Piton, J., Roué, M., Petrella, S., Aubry, A. & Mayer, C. (2012). Acta Cryst. F68, 178–180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  7. Jacobs, G. H., Rackham, O., Stockwell, P. A., Tate, W. & Brown, C. M. (2002). Nucleic Acids. Res. 30, 310–311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  8. Kabsch, W. (2010). Acta Cryst. D66, 125–132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  9. Levine, C., Hiasa, H. & Marians, K. J. (1998). Biochem. Biophys. Acta, 400, 29–43. [DOI] [PubMed]
  10. Lewis, R. J., Singh, O. M., Smith, C. V., Skarzynski, T., Maxwell, A., Wonacott, A. J. & Wigley, D. B. (1996). EMBO J. 15, 1412–1420. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  11. Maruri, F., Sterling, T. R., Kaiga, A. W., Blackman, A., van der Heijden, Y. F., Mayer, C., Cambau, E. & Aubry, A. (2012). J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 67, 819–831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  12. Matthews, B. W. (1968). J. Mol. Biol. 33, 491–497. [DOI] [PubMed]
  13. Mayer, C. & Aubry, A. (2012). Understanding Tuberculosis – New Approaches to Fighting Against Drug Resistance, edited by P. J. Cardona, pp. 291–308. Rijeka: InTech.
  14. Murshudov, G. N., Skubák, P., Lebedev, A. A., Pannu, N. S., Steiner, R. A., Nicholls, R. A., Winn, M. D., Long, F. & Vagin, A. A. (2011). Acta Cryst. D67, 355–367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  15. Otwinowski, Z., Borek, D., Majewski, W. & Minor, W. (2003). Acta Cryst. A59, 228–234. [DOI] [PubMed]
  16. Piton, J., Matrat, S., Petrella, S., Jarlier, V., Aubry, A. & Mayer, C. (2009). Acta Cryst. F65, 1182–1186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  17. Piton, J., Petrella, S., Delarue, M., André-Leroux, G., Jarlier, V., Aubry, A. & Mayer, C. (2010). PLoS One, 5, e12245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  18. Revel-Viravau, V., Truong, Q. C., Moreau, N., Jarlier, V. & Sougakoff, W. (1996). Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40, 2054–2061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  19. Schoeffler, A. J. & Berger, J. M. (2008). Q. Rev. Biophys. 41, 41–101. [DOI] [PubMed]
  20. Storoni, L. C., McCoy, A. J. & Read, R. J. (2004). Acta Cryst. D60, 432–438. [DOI] [PubMed]
  21. Winn, M. D. et al (2011). Acta Cryst. D67, 235–242.

Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section F: Structural Biology and Crystallization Communications are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES