Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 May 31.
Published in final edited form as: J Org Chem. 2006 Jun 9;71(12):4516–4520. doi: 10.1021/jo0602975

Mild Conversion of β-Diketones and β-Ketoesters to Carboxylic Acids

Yang Zhang 1, Jingliang Jiao 1, Robert A Flowers II 1,
PMCID: PMC3668858  NIHMSID: NIHMS63090  PMID: 16749782

Abstract

A mild protocol for the conversion of β-ketoesters and β-diketones to carboxylic acids using CAN in CH3CN is described. The method is compatible with a number of functional groups, and can generate carboxylic acids under neutral conditions at room temperature. The reaction is fast and general, providing an alternative method to the commonly used malonic ester acid preparation. Initial mechanistic studies show that initial oxidation of the enol form of the β-dicarbonyl initiates the reaction. The presence of nitrate as an oxidant ligand or as an additive is critical for success of the reaction.

Keywords: Carboxylic Acids, Oxidation, Ceric Ammonium Nitrate

Introduction

Carboxylic acids are ubiquitous and important components of numerous biomolecules and synthetic targets of high pharmaceutical value. Although widespread in nature, organic synthesis has greatly expanded the useful family of carboxylic acids. The traditional methods for preparing carboxylic acids include oxidation of primary alcohols13 and aldehydes,47 reaction of organometallic reagents with carbon dioxide,810 hydrolysis of acid derivatives11 and nitriles,1214 oxidative cleavage of alkenes1519 and alkynes,20,21 haloform type reactions,2224 and periodic acid cleavage of vicinal diols and diketones.2529 Although many useful methods have been developed for the preparation of carboxylic acids, the procedures usually require strenuous reaction conditions including high temperatures, acidic/basic media or the use of toxic reagents. These protocols are often incompatible with many functional groups and sometimes are environmentally unfriendly. Taking these points into account, we report a novel, mild, neutral, efficient, and functional group compatible procedure for synthesis of carboxylic acids through fragmentation of β-ketoesters and β-diketones compounds with cerium ammonium nitrate (CAN).

Results and Discussion

While CAN is a useful reagent for intermolecular carbon-carbon bond formation,30 the application of CAN in intramolecular C-C bond formation is not as prevalent. With this in mind, 6-Phenyl-hexane-2,4-dione was prepared and treated with 2 equiv of CAN in CH3CN at room temperature. It was expected that an intramolecular reaction would occur to provide the cyclized product shown in Scheme 1. Surprisingly, no cyclization was observed, and instead 3-phenylpropionic acid was obtained as the exclusive product of the reaction. Although oxidative cleavage of β-dicarbonyls and α-hydroxyketones to carboxylic acids with oxone have been reported,31,32 some of the experiments required elevated temperatures, long reaction times (18 hrs.), basic (Oxone decomposes when pH<5), and aqueous conditions. Considering the neutral and mild conditions using CAN, the generality of the reaction shown in Scheme 1 was examined. The results of reactions of a series of alkylated β-diketones and β-ketoesters with CAN in CH3CN are summarized in Table 1. The NMR spectra and MS data for all known products were compared to authentic samples.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Table 1.

Reaction of β-diketones and β-ketoesters with CAN

Entry Substrate Product Yield
1 graphic file with name nihms63090t1.jpg 1 graphic file with name nihms63090t2.jpg 42%a
1a
2 graphic file with name nihms63090t3.jpg 2 graphic file with name nihms63090t4.jpg 83%a
2a
3 graphic file with name nihms63090t5.jpg 3 graphic file with name nihms63090t6.jpg 72%a
3a
4 graphic file with name nihms63090t7.jpg 4 graphic file with name nihms63090t8.jpg 67%a
4a
5 graphic file with name nihms63090t9.jpg 5 graphic file with name nihms63090t10.jpg 76%a
5a
6 graphic file with name nihms63090t11.jpg 6 graphic file with name nihms63090t12.jpg 82%a
6a
7 graphic file with name nihms63090t13.jpg 7 graphic file with name nihms63090t14.jpg 88%a
7a
8 graphic file with name nihms63090t15.jpg 8 graphic file with name nihms63090t16.jpg 78%a
8a
9 graphic file with name nihms63090t17.jpg 9 graphic file with name nihms63090t18.jpg 75%a
9a
10 graphic file with name nihms63090t19.jpg 10 graphic file with name nihms63090t20.jpg 76%b
10a
11 graphic file with name nihms63090t21.jpg 11 graphic file with name nihms63090t22.jpg 90%b
11a
12 graphic file with name nihms63090t23.jpg 12 graphic file with name nihms63090t24.jpg 80%b
12a
13 graphic file with name nihms63090t25.jpg 13 graphic file with name nihms63090t26.jpg 63%b
13a
14 graphic file with name nihms63090t27.jpg 14 graphic file with name nihms63090t28.jpg 95%a
14a
a

Isolated yield.

b

GC yield.

Reaction conditions: 1 equiv. of substrate was added to 2.2 equiv of CAN in CH3CN. The reaction was carried out at rt under a nitrogen atmosphere for 4 hrs. Solvent was removed at the completion of the reaction and water was added. The solution was extracted with ether and dried over MgSO4.

Examination of the results in Table 1 shows that the corresponding acids can be obtained in good to high yields for the substrates examined in this initial study and the results are comparable for β-diketones and β-ketoesters. The relatively low yield from compound 1 is likely due to the higher water solubility of the product compared with others examined. Interestingly the product for 1,3-indanedione (14) was the corresponding anhydride formed in nearly quantitative yield.

Since all of the reported yields were obtained utilizing unoptimized conditions described in Scheme 1, a number of reaction conditions were examined to determine if the yields could be further optimized and also to possibly obtain insight into the mechanism of this mild conversion. The data are contained in Table 2. The enol form of 1,3-diketones are readily oxidized by CAN,33 so initially 3,3-dimethyl-2,4-pentanedione was examined to determine if reaction through a pathway other than electron transfer was possible (Table 2, entry 1). The lack of reaction with this substrate shows that the first step in the reaction is likely to be oxidation of the enol to a radical cation.34 Use of methanol (MeOH) as a solvent medium provided the corresponding methyl ester in good yields. Use of ceric tetra-n- butylammonium nitrate (CTAN) in CH2Cl2 provided comparable yields to reaction of 6 with CAN in CH3CN (Table 2, entries 2 and 3). Next, the reaction was carried out in a drybox in the absence of O2 and workup without water addition. Unexpectedly, the product acid was obtained in excellent yield in the absence of these two potential sources of oxygen in the product (Table 2, entry 4). This optimized procedure was used in all subsequent reactions.

Table 2.

Examination of reaction outcome under a variety of conditions

Entry Substrate Oxidant, Solvent Product Yieldc
1 graphic file with name nihms63090t29.jpg CAN, CH3CNa Starting material N/A
2 6 CAN, CH3OHa graphic file with name nihms63090t30.jpg 63%
3 6 CTAN, CH2Cl2a 6a 80%
4 6 CAN, CH3CNb 6a 95%
5 6 Ce(OTf)4, CH3CNa Starting material + unidentified products N/A
6 6 Ce(OTf)4, 10 equiv NH4NO3, CH3CNa 6a 42%
7 6 NH4NO3, CH3CNa NR N/A
8 6 HNO3, CH3CNa NR N/A

Reaction conditions:

a

See footnote in Table 1.

b

After reaction, solvent was removed and the products were added to ether (instead of water) and dried over MgSO4 (see optimized procedure in experimental section).

c

Isolated yield.

Surprisingly, other Ce(IV) based reagents did not promote this conversion. For instance, when cerium(IV) triflate was employed as the oxidant (Table 2, entry 5), no conversion occurred and only starting material and unidentified side products were obtained. Since internal ligand transfer of nitrate to substrate is common in many reactions of CAN,35 it is possible that the nitrate ligand played a role in the reaction. The potential role for nitrate was studied by the addition of 10 equivalents of ammonium nitrate (based on Ce(IV) concentration) to the reaction with cerium(IV) triflate and this experiment provided a 42% yield of acid product 6a (Table 2, entry 6). Addition of ammonium nitrate or nitric acid alone to 6 led to recovery of starting material (Table 2, entries 7 and 8). These studies suggest that nitrate along with Ce(IV) are necessary for the success of these reactions.

In all of the reactions studied thus far, cleavage of the chosen 1,3-dicarbonyls provided a carboxylic acid, but the identity of the portion extruded was not found in the reaction mixture likely due to loss through aqueous workup or evaporation during solvent removal. To examine this issue further, a 1,3-dione was chosen so that both portions of the molecule were sufficiently lipophilic and nonvolatile under the reaction conditions to allow easy isolation. Reaction of 1,5-diphenylpentane-1,3-dione (15) with 2.2 equiv of CAN in acetonitrile followed by the standard workup produced a nearly equimolar amount of 3-phenylpropionic acid (15a) and benzoic acid (15b) (Scheme 2).

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Although the intermediates leading to these products have not been identified with a great degree of certainty, examination of the reaction utilizing React IR (supporting information) showed the appearance of bands at 2850 cm−1 and 2930 cm−1, which are characteristic of the C-H stretch in α-keto aldehydes. Reactions run in CD3CN within an NMR tube showed a 1H NMR peak consistent with the aldehydic proton of a α-keto aldehyde along with peaks consistent with the formation of a carboxylic acid. To determine the fate of the central carbon, the α-methylated diketone (16) was prepared. Reaction of 16 with 2.2 equiv of CAN in CH3CN resulted in a 16% isolated yield of 1-phenylpropane-1,2-dione (16a) along with unreacted starting material as shown in Scheme 2. A longer reaction time provided a higher yield of 16a. Examination of the 1H NMR spectrum of 16 shows that α-methylation of the 1,3-diketone significantly decreases the enol content and this likely contributes to the decreased rate of oxidation by CAN.

Based on the experimental data described to this point, a reasonable mechanism can be proposed. It is likely that after oxidation of the enol form of the 1,3- dicarbonyl by Ce(IV) and internal ligand transfer of nitrate, that rearrangement leads to a carboxylic acid and an α-keto aldehyde which can be further oxidized to a carboxylic acid (Scheme 3).36 The mechanism in Scheme 3 shows the loss of NO and attempts to trap it by the addition of anisole to the reaction mixture were inconclusive since the ortho and para nitrated products produced in this experiment can also be formed by reaction of CAN with anisole alone (albeit at a slower rate).37

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

To be useful in synthesis, it is important to determine the functional group compatibility for this method. A series of different β-dicarbonyl substrates containing oxidizable functional groups were prepared and the results of their reactions using the optimized anhydrous procedure are contained in Table 3. The yields of the reactions are very good and phenyl methoxy groups, double bonds, alkyl hydroxy groups and aryliodides are all compatible with this methodology. Since alcohols and phenyl methoxy groups are known to be oxidized by CAN, these findings indicate that the selectivity is likely due to the fast rate of oxidation of 1,3-dicarbonyls relative to other functional groups.38

Table 3.

Functional group compatibility studies

Entry Substrate Product Yielda
1 graphic file with name nihms63090t31.jpg 17 graphic file with name nihms63090t32.jpg 72%, 17a
2 graphic file with name nihms63090t33.jpg 18 graphic file with name nihms63090t34.jpg 81%, 18a
3 graphic file with name nihms63090t35.jpg 19 graphic file with name nihms63090t36.jpg 80%, 19a
4 graphic file with name nihms63090t37.jpg 20 graphic file with name nihms63090t38.jpg 89%, 20a
5 graphic file with name nihms63090t39.jpg 21 graphic file with name nihms63090t40.jpg 92%, 21a
6 graphic file with name nihms63090t41.jpg 22 graphic file with name nihms63090t42.jpg 74%, 22a
7 graphic file with name nihms63090t43.jpg 23 graphic file with name nihms63090t44.jpg 88%, 23a

Reaction conditions: See footnote b in Table 2.

a

Isolated yield.

Conclusions

A mild method for the conversion of β-ketoesters and β-diketones to carboxylic acids using CAN in CH3CN has been developed. The method is compatible with a number of other functional groups and can be carried out under neutral conditions. Aside from functional group compatibility, the procedure can be carried out in a number of solvents as well. Initial studies of the reaction show that the nitrate ligand is necessary for the conversion initiated by Ce(IV). Although Ce is an abundant, non-toxic, and inexpensive metal, one of the major goals of modern chemical research is to develop chemical processes that are environmentally benign. If Ce(IV) is only necessary to initiate oxidation, alternative approaches to this reaction may be possible by initiating the oxidation of β-dicarbonyls electrochemically in the presence of nitrate salts.39 Further examination of the mechanistic details of the conversion are being explored to determine if this mild procedure can be utilized in other important functional group conversions or bond forming reactions.

Experimental Section

Materials and experimental procedures

All solvents were distilled before use. Ceric tetra-n-butyl ammonium nitrate (CTAN)40 and cerium triflate (CTF)41 were prepared following reported procedures. β-Dicarbonyl substrates 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, and 23 were prepared by the reaction of 2,4-pentanedione or methyl acetoacetate with corresponding halides under the treatment of NaH and BuLi. Compound 16 was prepared from 1-phenyl-butane-1,3-dione, methyl iodide, potassium carbonate, and tetra-n-butylammonium bromide in toluene according to the published procedure.42 All other substrates were purchased and used without further purification. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a 500 MHz spectrometer. Infrared experiments were performed on a React IR system.

Procedure for oxidation of β-dicarbonyls using CAN in CH3CN

Ceric ammonium nitrate (CAN, 4.4mmol, in 10 mL CH3CN) solution was added to a solution of the β-dicarbonyl (2 mmol) in 40 mL CH3CN under N2 over a period of 2 minutes. After 4 hrs, CH3CN was removed at 30°C by rotary evaporation. Water (75 mL) was poured into the reaction funnel and extracted with 4 × 25 mL diethyl ether. The organic extracts were washed with brine, dried over anhydrous MgSO4, filtered and concentrated via rotary evaporation. The residue was analyzed by GC-MS and purified with column chromatography using silica gel as the stationary phase.

Optimized procedure for oxidation of β-dicarbonyls using CAN in CH3CN

Ceric ammonium nitrate (CAN, 4.4mmol, in 10 mL CH3CN) was added to a solution of the β-dicarbonyl (2 mmol) in 40 mL CH3CN over a period of 2 minutes under an inert atmosphere. After 4 hrs, solvent was removed at 30°C by rotary evaporation. Ether (40 mL) was poured into the reaction flask and the solution was dried over anhydrous MgSO4, filtered and concentrated via rotary evaporation. The residue was analyzed by GC-MS and purified via column chromatography using silica gel as the stationary phase.

6-Naphthalen-2-yl-hexane-2,4-dione (3)

6-Naphthalen-2-yl-hexane-2,4-dione was prepared by the reaction of 2,4-pentadione and 2-(2-bromo-ethyl)-naphthalene following the general procedure for the preparation of 2,4-dione derivatives. 3: H1 NMR (500MHz, CDCl3): δ 2.03 (s, 3H); 2.67 (t, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz); 2.90 (t, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz); 5.49 (s, 1H); 7.30–7.44 (m, 3H); 7.61–7.79 (m, 4H), 15.46 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (125MHz, CDCl3): δ 193.2; 190.4; 138.2; 132.1; 128.1; 127.6; 127.5; 127.0; 126.4; 126.0; 125.3; 100.1; 45.1; 39.9; 31.6; 24.8. MS m/z (rel int): 240 (M+, 30), 207 (12), 182 (10), 154 (55), 141 (100), 126 (12), 115 (25), 85 (35). HRMS (EI) calcd for C16H16O2 240.1150, found 240.1162.

6-(2-Methoxyphenyl)-hexane-2,4-dione (17)

6-(2-Methoxy-phenyl)-hexane-2,4-dione was prepared by the reaction of 2,4-pentadione and 1-bromomethyl-2-methoxy-benzene following the general procedure for the preparation of 2,4-dione derivatives. 17: 1H NMR (500MHz, CDCl3): δ 2.03 (s, 3H); 2.55 (t, J=8.2 Hz, 2H); 2.90 (t, J=8.2 Hz, 2H); 3.53 (s, 0.3H); 3.81 (s, 3H); 5.47 (s, 0.8H); 7.19–7.10 (m, 4H); 15.46 (s, 0.7H). 13C NMR (125MHz, CDCl3): δ 194.0; 191.0; 157.4; 129.8; 129.0; 127.5; 120.4; 110.2; 99.9; 55.2; 38.3; 26.6; 24.9. MS m/z (rel int): 220 (M+, 35), 134 (33), 121 (100), 91 (90), 65 (22). HRMS (EI) calcd for C13H16O3 220.1099, found 220.1106.

6-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-hexane-2,4-dione (18)

6-(4-Methoxy-phenyl)-hexane-2,4-dione was prepared by the reaction of 2,4-pentadione and 1-bromomethyl-4-methoxy-benzene following the general procedure for the preparation of 2,4-dione derivatives. 18: 1H NMR (500MHz, CDCl3): δ 2.02 (s, 3H); 2.54 (t, J=8.2Hz, 2H); 2.85 (t, J=8.2Hz, 2H); 3.52 (s, 0.3H); 3.76 (s, 3H); 5.45 (s, 0.7H); 7.09–6.79 (m, 4H); 15.45 (s, 0.7H). 13C NMR (125MHz, CDCl3): δ 193.3; 191.2; 158.0; 132.7; 129.3; 129.2; 113.9; 113.9; 100.0; 55.2; 40.3; 30.7; 24.9. MS m/z (rel int): 220 (M+, 48), 121 (100), 85 (21). HRMS (EI) calcd for C13H16O3 220.1099, found 220.1099.

6-(3-Methoxyphenyl)-hexane-2,4-dione (19)

6-(3-Methoxy-phenyl)-hexane-2,4-dione was prepared by the reaction of 2,4-pentadione and 1-bromomethyl-3-methoxy-benzene following the general procedure for the preparation of 2,4-dione derivatives. 19: 1H NMR (500MHz, CDCl3): δ 2.03 (s, 3H); 2.58 (t, J=8.1Hz, 2H); 2.89 (t, J=8.1Hz, 2H); 3.75 (s, 3H); 4.53 (s, 0.2H); 5.46 (s, 0.9H); 7.24–6.71 (m, 4H); 15.43 (s, 0.7H). 13C NMR (125MHz, CDCl3): δ 193.4; 190.9; 129.7; 129.0; 127.6; 120.5; 112.3; 111.1; 100.1; 55.2; 40.2; 30.7; 24.9. MS m/z (rel int): 220 (M+, 67), 135 (100), 121 (68), 85 (70). HRMS (EI) calcd for C13H16O3 220.1099, found 220.1101.

11-Methoxy-undecane-2,4-dione (21)

11-Methoxy-undecane-2,4-dione was prepared by the reaction of 2,4-pentadione and 1-Bromo-6-methoxy-hexane following the general procedure for the preparation of 2,4-dione derivatives. 21: 1H NMR (500MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.30 (m, 6H); 1.53 (m, 4H); 2.03 (s, 3H); 2.23 (t, 2H, J=7.5Hz); 3.30 (s, 3H); 3.35 (t, 2H, J=7.5Hz); 5.46 (s, 1H); 14.95 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (125MHz, CDCl3): δ 195.4; 192.1; 99.8; 72.8; 58.5; 38.4; 38.2; 29.6; 29.2; 29.1; 25.9; 25.6. MS m/z (rel int): 214 (M+, 1), 182 (1), 164 (3), 138 (5), 100 (65), 85 (100), 55 (30). HRMS (EI) calcd for C12H22O3 214.1569, found 214.1577.

6-(4-Iodo-phenyl)-hexane-2,4-dione (23)

6-(4-Iodo-phenyl)-hexane-2,4-dione was prepared by the treatment of 2,4-pentadione with 1-bromomethyl-4-iodo-benzene hexane following the general procedure for the preparation of 2,4-dione derivatives. 23: 1H NMR (500MHz, CDCl3): δ 2.02 (s, 3H); 2.54 (t, 2H, J=8.0Hz); 2.81 (t, 2H, J=8Hz); 5.42 (s, 1H); 6.92 (d, 2H, J=8.2Hz); 7.58 (d, 2H, J=8.2Hz); 15.45 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (125MHz, CDCl3): δ 194.2; 192.5; 140.3; 137.5; 130.4; 100.1; 39.7; 30.8; 24.8. MS m/z (rel int): 316 (M+, 100), 298 (10), 258 (12), 217 (100), 131 (25), 103 (45), 85 (100). HRMS (EI) calcd for C12H13IO2 315.9960, found 315.9969.

Supplementary Material

1si20060413_03

Acknowledgments

RAF is grateful to the National Institutes of Health (1R15GM075960-01) and Lehigh University for partial support of this work. The authors thank James Devery, Paul Rearden, and Dr. Pramod Mohanta for their assistance with some of the experiments described in this paper and Dr. Rebecca Miller for her useful comments on the manuscript.

Footnotes

Supporting Information: General methods, experimental protocols, and spectroscopic data. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org

References

  • 1.Pattison FLM, Stothers JB, Woolford RG. J Am Chem Soc. 1956;78:2255–2259. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Newman MS, Arkell A, Fukunaga T. J Am Chem Soc. 1960;82:2498–2501. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Carlsen PHJ, Katsuki T, Martin VS, Sharpless KB. J Org Chem. 1960;46:3936–3938. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sam DJ, Simmons HE. J Am Chem Soc. 1972;94:4024–4025. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Berkowitz LM, Rylander PN. J Am Chem Soc. 1958;80:6682–6684. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wiberg KB, Lepse PA. J Am Chem Soc. 1964;86:2612–2619. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Travis BR, Sivakumar M, Hollist GO, Borhan B. Org Lett. 2003;5(7):1031–1034. doi: 10.1021/ol0340078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Arnold LD, Drover JCD, Vederas JC. J Am Chem Soc. 1987;109:4649–4659. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Stuckwisch CG, Bailey GV. J Org Chem. 1963;28:2362–2363. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cohen HL, Wright GF. J Org Chem. 1953;18:432–446. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Deno NC, Billups WE, DiStefano RE, McDonald KM, Schneider S. J Org Chem. 1970;35:278–279. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.DiBiase SA, Wolak RP, Dishong DM, Gokel GW. J Org Chem. 1980;45:3630–3634. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Newman MS, Wise RM. J Am Chem Soc. 1956;78:450–454. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Anzalone L, Hirsch JA. J Org Chem. 1985;50:2128–2133. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Stork G, Meisels A, Davies JE. J Am Chem Soc. 1963;85:3419–3425. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Miller HN, Greenlee KW. J Org Chem. 1961;26:3734–3739. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Krapcho AP, Larson JR, Eldridge JM. J Org Chem. 1977;42:3749–3753. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Patel DV, VanMiddlesworth F, Donaubauer J, Gannett P, Sih CJ. J Am Chem Soc. 1986;108:4603–4614. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Henry JR, Weinreb SM. J Org Chem. 1993;58:4745–4745. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.McKillop A, Oldenziel OH, Swann BP, Taylor EC, Robey RL. J Am Chem Soc. 1971;93:7331–7333. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lee DG, Chang VS. J Org Chem. 1979;44:2726–2730. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fusan RC, Bull BA. Chem Rev. 1934;15:275–309. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Owen J, Simonsen JL. J Chem Soc. 1932;134:1424–1429. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Simonsen JL. J Chem Soc. 1922;121:2292–2299. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ohrui H, Misawa T, Meguro H. J Org Chem. 1985;50:3007–3009. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Carlsen PHJ, Katsuki T, Martin VS, Sharpless KB. J Org Chem. 1981;46:3936–3938. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Torii S, Inokuchi T, Sugiura T. J Org Chem. 1986;51:155–161. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ireland RE, Norbeck DW, Mandel GS, Mandel NS. J Am Chem Soc. 1985;107:3285–3294. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Shiner VJ, Wasmuth CR. J Am Chem Soc. 1959;81:37–42. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Nair V, Mathew J, Prabhakaran J. Chem Soc Rev. 1997;26:127–132. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ashford SW, Grega KC. J Org Chem. 2001;66:1523–1524. doi: 10.1021/jo001579m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Yan J, Travis BR, Borhan B. J Org Chem. 2004;69:9299–9302. doi: 10.1021/jo048665x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Nair V, Balagopal L, Rajan R, Mathew J. Acc Chem Res. 2004;37:21–30. doi: 10.1021/ar030002z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Schmittel M, Burghart A. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 1997;36:2550–2589. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.(a) Paolobelli AB, Gioacchini F, Ruzziconi R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993;34:6333–6336. [Google Scholar]; (b) Baciocchi E, Civitarese G, Ruzziconi R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987;28:5357–5360. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.(a) Niki E, Yamamoto y, Saito T, Nagano K, Yokoi S, Kamiya Y. Bull Chem Soc Jpn. 1983;56:223–228. [Google Scholar]; (b) Antal MJ, Jr, Mok WSL, Richards GN. Carbohyd Res. 1990;199:111–115. doi: 10.1016/0008-6215(90)84096-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Dincturk S, Ridd JH. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 2. 1982:961–964. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zhang Y, Flowers RA., II J Org Chem. 2003;68:4560–4562. doi: 10.1021/jo034384y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Cho LY, Romero J, Quim R. Nova. 1998;21:144–145. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Muathen HA. Ind J Chem. 1991;30B(5):522–524. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Laali KK, Herbert M, Cushnyr B, Bhatt A, Terrano DJ. Chem Soc, Perkin Trans 1. 2001;6:578–583. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Choudhary A, Baumstark AL. Synthesis. 1989;9:688–690. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1si20060413_03

RESOURCES