Abstract
LIF activates several intracellular signaling pathways including JAK-STAT, PI3K/AKT and MAPK pathways. LIF is an important cytokine for maintenance of pluripotency and self-renewal of mouse ES cells. The JAK-STAT signal plays a key role in maintenance of the pluripotency of ESCs. Recent evidence shows that several post-translational modifications regulate activation or inhibition of intracellular signal transductions. The JAK-STAT signal is also modulated by several modifications including phosphorylation, acetylation and ubiquitination. In this review, we discuss regulation of the LIF-mediated-JAK-STAT signaling pathway that contributes to self-renewal of pluripotent ESCs.
Keywords: STAT, ubiquitin, ESC, TRIM, Hsp90
Introduction
Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) are pluripotent cells established from preimplantation embryos.1,2 ESCs are nontransformed mammalian stem cells that can continuously proliferate in vitro. Self-renewal of ESCs is maintained by culture with the cytokine leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF).3-5 LIF inhibits differentiation and promotes proliferation of undifferentiated cells. Actually, LIF is always provided to the culture medium of mouse ESCs and the removal of LIF causes rapid differentiation of mouse ESCs.
Upon binding to the LIF receptor (LIFR), LIF causes heterodimerization of the low-affinity LIFR and gp130, which acts as the main receptor for intracellular signal transduction (Fig. 1).6 Briefly, ligand binding leads to phosphorylation and activation of Janus kinase (JAK), which is tethered to the intracellular region of gp130.7-9 Activated JAK phosphorylates gp130 at four sites of tyrosine, and the phosphorylated tyrosine interacts with SH2-bearing proteins such as signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3). Then STAT3 is also tyrosine-phosphorylated by JAK and is homodimerized via its src-homology-2 (SH2) domains. The dimerized STAT3 translocates to the nucleus and activates target gene transcription.10 Consequently, activation of several genes by translocated STAT3 plays a role in suppression of the differentiation of mouse ESCs.11 JAK-STAT3 activates Klf4, which maintains Oct3/4 expression via Sox2 and Nanog.12 The molecules including Oct3/4, Sox2 and Nanog are known to be crucial for maintenance of pluripotency in ESCs. Therefore, STAT3 is one of the main players in the signaling pathway dependent on LIF in ESCs to maintain a pluripotent state. Importantly, it has been reported that activation of STAT3 is regulated by the ubiquitin system and translocation from the cytosol to the nucleus via molecular chaperones such as HSP90.13-16
Figure 1. Regulation of the LIF-mediated signaling pathway in mouse ESCs. LIF causes heterodimerization of LIFR and gp130. LIF causes phosphorylation and activation of JAK, which is tethered to the intracellular region of gp130. Activated JAK phosphorylates gp130 and its tyrosine phosphorylations causes interaction with STAT3. Then STAT3 is also tyrosine-phosphorylated by JAK and is homodimerized via its SH2 domains. The dimerized STAT3 translocates to the nucleus and activates target gene transcription. JAK-STAT3 activates Klf4, which maintains Oct3/4 expression via Nanog. JAK activates PI3K, which acts as an activator for AKT. AKT then upregulates Tbx3 as another pluripotency gene. The JAK-STAT pathway is negatively regulated by several inhibitory systems: dephosphorylation by tyrosine phosphatases including SHP and physical inhibition or ubiquitin-mediated degradation of JAK by SOCS. JAK phosphorylates SHP and then SHP interacts with the Grb2/SOS complex to activate the MAPK pathway, leading to inhibition of Tbx3 and Nanog. TRIM8 likely negatively regulates Hsp90β-mediated translocation of STAT3 into the nucleus of ESCs. SLIM is an E3 ubiquitin ligase that negatively regulates the JAK-STAT signal pathway, but SLIM is expressed at a low level in mouse ESCs. P, phosphorylation.
Maintenance of Pluripotency and Self-Renewal of Mouse ESCs via LIF
LIF-mediated signaling regulates proliferation or differentiation depending on the cell type or differentiated stage of the cell.17 Past evidence showed that stage of the cell and uncontrolled secretion of LIF are associated with pathological conditions.18 LIF is also a key cytokine for maintaining self-renewal and pluripotency of mouse ESCs. Therefore, it is important to clarify molecular mechanism of LIF signaling in mouse ESCs. In contrast to mouse ESCs, fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2), also called basic FGF (bFGF), and activin A are used to maintain self-renewal in human ESCs.19,20 Recent studies have shown that human ESCs are slightly differentiated cells in the “primed state” and that mouse ESCs are fully undifferentiated cells in the “naïve state,” suggesting that LIF maintains the “naïve state” of pluripotency (Fig. 2).21 Actually, transcriptome analyses showed differences in the expression profiles of genes in mouse and human ESCs, indicating that these cells may not be derived from the same lineages of early embryos and that human ESCs are likely to be LIF-independent because of the establishment from cell lineages later than early epiblast.22-25
Figure 2. Factors required for maintaining self-renewal and pluripotency of mouse and human ESCs. LIF is a key cytokine for maintaining self-renewal and pluripotency of mouse ESCs. In contrast to mouse ESCs, fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2), also called basic FGF (bFGF), and activin A are used to maintain self-renewal in human ESCs. Human ESCs are likely to be slightly differentiated cells in the “primed state” and mouse ESCs are fully undifferentiated cells in the “naïve state.”
LIF-Mediated Signaling Pathway in ESCs
The activity of LIF was first identified in 1969 by Ichikawa, and it was shown that its activity could inhibit proliferation and induce macrophage differentiation of the M1 leukemic myeloid cell line.26 This biological activity, called “differentiation factor (D-factor),” was partially purified from a cell-conditioned medium prepared from mouse embryos.27 Gearing et al. purified mouse D-factor/LIF from a Krebs II ascites cell-derived conditioned medium and isolated a mouse D-factor/LIF cDNA clone.28 Human LIF and mouse LIF are 180-amino-acid glycoproteins and belong to the interleukin-6 (IL-6) subfamily.29,30 LIF proteins have at least three isoforms: a soluble form called LIF-D (soluble form), LIF-i/LIF-T (intracellular form) and LIF-M (a form localized in the extracellular matrix).31-33 LIF-M and LIF-D are synthesized as alternative transcripts differing in the first exon. LIF-T is a truncated isoform because of the initiation of translation at the first ATG codon of exon 2. LIF knockout mice have been established and analyzed in detail. Although homozygous LIF−/− mice are viable, they have many defects including decrease in cell lineages such as hematopoietic stem cells, primordial germ cells and motor neurons.34,35 Notably, female LIF−/− mice are fertile, but their blastocysts cannot implant in the uterine epithelium because of the absence of LIF secretion as a nidation hormone from the uterus.34
LIF-related cytokines, including LIF, oncostatin M (OSM), cardiotrophin (CT-1) and ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF), function within a gp130 receptor complex and can sustain ESC self-renewal.36-39 Furthermore, ESCs can be maintained by using a combination of interleukin-6 and soluble interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6/sIL-6R) and their intracellular signaling is engaged via formation of gp130 homodimers even without LIFR.40,41 Therefore, intracellular signals from gp130 are sufficient for self-renewal of mouse ESCs. In addition to ESC self-renewal, activation of gp130 receptor complexes causes differentiation and growth inhibition in M1 myeloid leukemic cells, survival and differentiation of neurons, astrocytes and hypertrophy in cardiomyocytes.37,42-45 An LIFR−/− mouse has already been established and analyzed. LIFR−/− mice showed decrease in bone volume (osteopenia), reduction in the numbers of motor neurons and astrocytes, abnormality of placenta and metabolic liver diseases.46,47 LIFR−/− mice perinatally die probably due to developmental disorder of muscles including sucking muscles. Mice lacking gp130 have also been established. gp130−/− mice die between 12 to 16 d of embryogenesis, due to hematopoietic, neuronal and heart disorders.48 These findings suggest that LIFR and gp130 are critical receptors for early embryogenesis and organogenesis.
LIF causes heterodimerization of LIFR and gp130 (Fig. 1).6 Ligand-induced dimerization of the receptors leads to phosphorylation at tyrosine 1022 (Y1022) of JAK1 and activation of associated JAK1.7,8,49,50 Four tyrosine residues (Y765/812/904/914) of the cytoplasmic domain of gp130 and three tyrosine residues (Y976/996/1023) of LIFR are phosphorylated by the activated JAKs. These phosphotyrosine residues then interact with the SH2 domain of STAT3. JAK then phosphorylates STAT3 at tyrosine 705 (Y705), leading to homodimerization of STAT3 via its SH2 domain and its translocation to the nucleus to transcribe target genes. Homodimerized STAT3 is imported into the nucleus through interaction with importin-α3 and importin-α6 and binds to the consensus sequence TTCCSGGGAA (S = C or G) at the promoter or enhancer regions of target genes.51,52 A previous study showed that dominant interfering mutants of STAT3 inhibit macrophage differentiation of myeloid M1 cells after stimulation with LIF.53 Furthermore, studies using knockout mice have shown that homologous disruption of the STAT3 gene causes early embryonic lethality, while ESCs in which both STAT1 genes have been deleted are phenotypically normal.54,55 STAT5 has two genes, STAT5A and STAT5B, that are 96% identical. STAT5A and STAT5B knockout mice fail to response to prolactin and growth hormone, respectively. However, STAT5A/B double knockout mice develop a full complement of hematopoietic lineages and display subtler defects in embryonic hematopoietic development. However, homologous disruption of both STAT5 genes does not cause embryonic lethality.56 These findings suggest that STAT3 is important for maintenance of ESC proliferation and pluripotency, whereas STAT1 and STAT5 are dispensable for maintenance of pluripotency.
Other Regulations in the LIF-Mediated Signaling Pathway
The JAK-STAT pathway is negatively regulated by several inhibitory systems: dephosphorylation by tyrosine phosphatases including SH2-containing tyrosine phosphatase (SHP), protein tyrosine phosphatase 1b (PTP1B) and protein tyrosine phosphatase basophil-like (PTP-BL), inhibition by sumo-1 conjugation via protein inhibitor of activated STAT (PIAS), and physical inhibition or ubiquitin-mediated degradation by SOCS3 (Fig. 1).57
As a second signal via LIF, JAK activates phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) through tyrosine-phosphorylation of the regulatory subunit p85, which acts as an activator for AKT (Fig. 1).58 AKT inhibits glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β) by direct phosphorylation of GSK3β at serine 9 (S9) and nuclear export of GSK3β independent of phosphorylation.59,60 Consequently, AKT suppresses the action of GSK3β, which inhibits Nanog expression. Hence, a GSK3β inhibitor supports self-renewal of mouse ESCs in the absence of LIF. Moreover, AKT upregulates Tbx3 as another pluripotency gene and causes acetylaton of STAT3 at lysine 686 (K686), which induces more stable homodimer formation of STAT3, probably followed by the activation of Klf4 and Oct3/4.61 Actually, a constitutively active form of AKT is sufficient for self-renewal of mouse ESCs even without feeder cells and LIF.62
As a third signal via LIF, JAK phosphorylates SHP2 recruited by binding to tyrosine 757 (Y757) of gp130 and tyrosine 969 (Y969) of LIFR (Fig. 1).63 SHP2 then interacts with the Grb2/SOS complex and activates the MAPK pathway, leading to downregulation of Tbx3 and Nanog probably via nuclear export.64 Therefore, the MEK inhibitor PD98059 inhibits differentiation of mouse ESCs and promotes ESC self-renewal.65
Ubiquitin-Proteasome System
Ubiquitination is one of the post-translational modifications used by eukaryotic cells, and the ubiquitin-mediated proteolytic pathway plays an important role in the degradation of short-lived regulatory proteins including those that contribute to cellular signaling, transcriptional regulation, cell cycle, DNA repair and protein quality control. Ubiquitin modification is mediated by a ubiquitin-activating enzyme (E1), ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (E2) and ubiquitin ligase (E3). E3 is a scaffold protein that mediates between E2 and the substrate. The resulting polyubiquitinated conjugates are quickly recognized and degraded by 26S proteasome. E3 is thought to be the component of the ubiquitin conjugation system that is most directly responsible for substrate recognition. On the basis of structural similarity, E3 enzymes have been classified into two major families: the HECT (homologous to E6-AP COOH terminus) family and the RING-finger protein family.66-70
Members of the superfamily of tripartite motif (TRIM)-containing proteins are defined as E3 ubiquitin ligases by the presence of a RING-finger domain.71 There are now more than 70 known TRIM proteins in humans and mice. TRIM proteins are characterized by the presence of a RING-finger domain, one or two zinc-binding motifs named B-boxes, and an associated coiled-coil region and are classified in subfamilies I to XI on the basis of differences in C-terminal domains.72,73 TRIM proteins exist in invertebrate species as well as vertebrates.74 Comparative analysis has shown that vertebrates have many TRIM family proteins with an SPRY domain in the C-terminal region, whereas invertebrate species have only a small number of TRIM family proteins with the SPRY domain. So far, TRIM proteins have not been identified in Arabidopsis thaliana, whereas proteins belonging to the U-box type E3 ligase family, another type of E3 ubiquitin family, have evolutionally been vastly amplified in A. thaliana genomes.75 However, there are 32 proteins with N-terminal B-boxes such as COL, STO and STH1/2 in A. thaliana.76
TRIM family proteins are involved in several biological processes including cell proliferation/differentiation and diverse pathological conditions such as cancer, developmental disorders, neurodegenerative diseases, inflammation and autoimmune diseases.77 Most of the TRIM proteins have roles as E3 ubiquitin ligases in the ubiquitination process, and several TRIM family members are involved in various biological processes, such as transcriptional regulation, cell proliferation and differentiation.
Ubiquitin System in JAK-STAT Signal
The JAK-STAT signal is negatively regulated by several mechanisms (Fig. 1).78 The SOCS family has eight proteins (SOCS1~7 and CIS), which are induced by activation via cytokines, growth factors and hormones, and they were originally identified as negative molecules that form negative feedback loops.79,80 All SOCS proteins have SH2 domain that is involved in binding to phosphorylated tyrosine, and a SOCS-box that functions as a binding motif for Cullin-2 as a component of E3 ubiquitin ligase. There are three molecular mechanisms to negatively modulate JAK-STAT activation signals. First, the N-terminal domain of SOCS likely becomes a pseudosubstrate for JAK to inhibit activated signals.81 Second, SOCS competes with downstream signal molecules by binding to tyrosine-phosphorylated receptor proteins.82 Third, SOCS proteins form E3 ubiquitin ligase complexes with Cullin-2, Elongin B, Elongin C and Rbx1 and ubiquitinate JAK and receptor molecules, followed by their degradation and internalization, respectively. SOCS1 mediates ubiquitination of JAK2 and TEL-JAK2 oncogene dependent on a SOCS-box.83,84 SOCS3 induces proteasome-dependent degradation of target receptors including CD33 and sialic-binding immunoglobulin-like lectin (Siglec) 7.85,86
It has been reported that STAT-interacting LIM protein (SLIM), which is a nuclear protein with both PDZ and LIM domains, functions as an E3 ubiquitin ligase for STAT proteins (Fig. 1).87 SLIM overexpression suppressed STAT1/4-mediated transcription by degradation of STAT proteins, whereas SLIM knockout caused increased STAT expression, followed by enhancement of interferon-γ (IFN-γ) production from Th1 cells. These findings suggest that SLIM is a bona fide E3 ubiquitin ligase that negatively regulates the JAK-STAT signal pathway. However, based on results of transcriptome analysis, SLIM is weakly expressed in mouse ESCs, indicating that SLIM may not be a main negative regulator for mouse ESCs (personal communications). Further detailed analysis of SLIM expression in mouse ESCs is needed to clarify the importance of JAK-STAT signals in ESCs.
Regulation of ESC Pluripotency by TRIM Proteins
TRIM8 is highly expressed in a variety of cancers including anaplastic oligodendroglioma and its gene maps to human chromosome 10q24.3.88 The region has frequent deletions or loss of heterozygosity in glioblastomas. Hence, TRIM8 is also called glioblastoma-expressed RING finger protein (GERP). It has been reported that TRIM8 is induced by IFN-γ and acts as a SOCS1-interacting protein.89 We showed that TRIM8 interacts with PIAS3, which inhibits IL-6-dependent activation of STAT3. TRIM8 overexpression suppresses the negative effect of PIAS3 on STAT3, either by degradation of PIAS3 via the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway or exclusion of PIAS3 from the nucleus.90 Although we checked more than 30 different types of cancer cell lines, we failed to detect endogenous TRIM8 in those cell lines. Finally, we checked ESCs because TRIM8 regulates PIAS3 and STAT3 is a crucial regulator for the LIF-dependent signaling pathway. We found that endogenous TRIM8 is highly expressed in mouse undifferentiated ESCs and that differentiated ESCs cultured without LIF do not express endogenous TRIM8, suggesting that TRIM8 is necessary for maintenance of pluripotency and self-renewal of ESCs. Actually, we showed that TRIM8 interacts with Hsp90β, which interacts with STAT3 and selectively downregulates transcription of Nanog in ESCs (Fig. 1).13,15,16 TRIM8 inhibits translocation of STAT3 into the nucleus through interaction with Hsp90β and consequently inhibits transcription of Nanog in ESCs, suggesting that TRIM8 regulates self-renewal or differentiation of ESCs.
Recently, we found that TRIM6, another of the TRIM family ubiquitin ligases, is also highly expressed in ESCs and binds to c-Myc and that TRIM6 overexpression causes decrease in c-Myc-mediated transcription.91 The proto-oncogene product c-Myc is known to be a master regulator of cell proliferation by specific binding to the E-box motif in promoter regions of target genes.92 It has also been reported that c-Myc plays an important role in the proliferation and maintenance of pluripotency of ESCs and that the transcriptional activity of c-Myc is regulated by several post-translational modifications including phosphorylation and ubiquitination.93 It has been reported that c-Myc overexpression maintains the pluripotency of mouse ESCs even without LIF, but sustained activation of c-Myc induces differentiation of human ESCs, suggesting that c-Myc has different functions in mouse and human ESCs.93,94 We showed that TRIM6 overexpression in mouse ESCs inhibits c-Myc-mediated transcription, resulting in induction of the differentiation of ESCs (Fig. 1). These findings suggest that TRIM6 controls the transcriptional activity of c-Myc for maintaining self-renewal and pluripotency of ESCs. In addition to ESCs, induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are established by the expression of four genes, Oct3/4, Sox2, Klf4 and c-Myc, into several cell lineages of mice and humans.95 However, the carcinogenic potential of c-myc inhibits its use in iPSCs for clinical application. However, the efficiency of iPSC establishment without c-Myc expression is very low.96 Therefore, appropriate regulation of the expression level of c-Myc at an inducing stage of stem cells should be important to establish iPSCs. TRIM6 is expressed at higher level in undifferentiated ESCs than in differentiated cells, and c-Myc expression level is robustly elevated in TRIM6-knockdown ESCs.91 Once ESCs enter the differentiation stage, the expression of TRIM6 is rapidly decreased.91 TRIM6-knockdown ESCs are rapidly differentiated even in the presence of LIF.91 Taken together, the findings indicate that TRIM6 may regulate c-Myc expression level within optimal ranges to maintain pluripotency of ESCs. It is likely that TRIM6 strictly modulates the expression level or activity of c-Myc to prevent dysregulation of cell proliferation by c-Myc in ESCs.
Concluding Remarks
Mouse ESCs are usually maintained by using LIF and feeder cells to inhibit differentiation. Recently, it has been reported that LIF can be replaced by chemical compounds to inhibit several signaling pathways. The cocktail of three inhibitors, a FGF-R tyrosine kinase inhibitor (SU5402), MEK inhibitor (PD184352) and GSK3β inhibitor (CHIR99021), is called 3i.97 This cocktail is sufficient to maintain mouse ESCs even in the absence of LIF. If a more potent MEK inhibitor (PD325901) is used, the cocktail (2i) including PD325901 and CHIR99021 is sufficient for maintaining self-renewal of mouse ESCs without LIF (Fig. 3).97 This recent technology has been established on the basis of results of studies on the LIF-mediated signal pathway at the detailed molecular level. Further studies to clarify related molecules and signal networks should lead to novel technologies for developmental engineering and tissue engineering.
Figure 3. Maintenance of self-renewal and pluripotency of mouse ESCs by chemical inhibitors. FGF4 autocrined by ESCs likely causes activation of SHP2-Ras-MAPK. Activation of the SHP2-Ras-MAPK cascade including MEK induces differentiation of ESCs. Moreover, activation of GSK3β causes phosphorylation of c-Myc followed by degradation of c-Myc and also inhibits Nanog expression, resulting in the differentiation of ESCs. LIF-mediated AKT activation causes phosphorylation of GSK3β, followed by inactivation of GSK3β (A). Without LIF, mouse ESCs are differentiated through unphosphorylated GSK3β and MAPK activated by autocrine FGF4 (B). The combination (2i) of a MEK inhibitor (PD184352/PD325901) and GSK3β inhibitor (CHIR99021) is sufficient for maintaining self-renewal and pluripotency of mouse ESCs without LIF (C).
Acknowledgments
We thank Yuri Soida for help in preparing the manuscript. The work was supported in part by KAKENHI (23659144 and 24390065) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology in Japan, The Sumitomo Foundation and The Suhara Foundation.
Glossary
Abbreviations:
- LIF
leukemia inhibitory factor
- ESC
embryonic stem cell
- LIFR
LIF receptor
- JAK
Janus kinase
- STAT3
signal transducer and activator of transcription 3
- SH2
src-homology-2
- FGF2
fibroblast growth factor 2
- bFGF
basic FGF
- D-factor
differentiation factor
- IL-6
interleukin-6
- OSM
oncostatin M
- CT-1
cardiotrophin
- CNTF
ciliary neurotrophic factor
- SHP
src-homology-2-containing tyrosine phosphatase
- PTP1B
protein tyrosine phosphatase 1b
- PTP-BL
protein tyrosine phosphatase basophil-like
- PIAS
protein inhibitor of activated STAT
- PI3K
phosphoinositide 3-kinase
- GSK3β
glycogen synthase kinase 3β
- E1
ubiquitin-activating enzyme
- E2
ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme
- E3
ubiquitin ligase
- HECT
homologous to E6-AP COOH terminus
- TRIM
tripartite motif
- Siglec
sialic-binding immunoglobulin-like lectin
- IFN-γ
interferon-γ
- SLIM
STAT-interacting LIM protein
- GERP
glioblastoma-expressed RING finger protein
- iPSC
induced pluripotent stem cell
Footnotes
Previously published online: www.landesbioscience.com/journals/jak-stat/article/21560
References
- 1.Evans MJ, Kaufman MH. Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature. 1981;292:154–6. doi: 10.1038/292154a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Martin GR. Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981;78:7634–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.12.7634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Smith AG, Hooper ML. Buffalo rat liver cells produce a diffusible activity which inhibits the differentiation of murine embryonal carcinoma and embryonic stem cells. Dev Biol. 1987;121:1–9. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(87)90132-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Smith AG, Heath JK, Donaldson DD, Wong GG, Moreau J, Stahl M, et al. Inhibition of pluripotential embryonic stem cell differentiation by purified polypeptides. Nature. 1988;336:688–90. doi: 10.1038/336688a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Williams RL, Hilton DJ, Pease S, Willson TA, Stewart CL, Gearing DP, et al. Myeloid leukaemia inhibitory factor maintains the developmental potential of embryonic stem cells. Nature. 1988;336:684–7. doi: 10.1038/336684a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gearing DP, Thut CJ, VandeBos T, Gimpel SD, Delaney PB, King J, et al. Leukemia inhibitory factor receptor is structurally related to the IL-6 signal transducer, gp130. EMBO J. 1991;10:2839–48. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07833.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Narazaki M, Witthuhn BA, Yoshida K, Silvennoinen O, Yasukawa K, Ihle JN, et al. Activation of JAK2 kinase mediated by the interleukin 6 signal transducer gp130. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91:2285–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.6.2285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Stahl N, Boulton TG, Farruggella T, Ip NY, Davis S, Witthuhn BA, et al. Association and activation of Jak-Tyk kinases by CNTF-LIF-OSM-IL-6 beta receptor components. Science. 1994;263:92–5. doi: 10.1126/science.8272873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Stahl N, Farruggella TJ, Boulton TG, Zhong Z, Darnell JE, Jr., Yancopoulos GD. Choice of STATs and other substrates specified by modular tyrosine-based motifs in cytokine receptors. Science. 1995;267:1349–53. doi: 10.1126/science.7871433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ihle JN. STATs: signal transducers and activators of transcription. Cell. 1996;84:331–4. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81277-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Niwa H, Burdon T, Chambers I, Smith A. Self-renewal of pluripotent embryonic stem cells is mediated via activation of STAT3. Genes Dev. 1998;12:2048–60. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.13.2048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Niwa H. How is pluripotency determined and maintained? Development. 2007;134:635–46. doi: 10.1242/dev.02787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Setati MM, Prinsloo E, Longshaw VM, Murray PA, Edgar DH, Blatch GL. Leukemia inhibitory factor promotes Hsp90 association with STAT3 in mouse embryonic stem cells. IUBMB Life. 2010;62:61–6. doi: 10.1002/iub.283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bradley E, Bieberich E, Mivechi NF, Tangpisuthipongsa D, Wang G. Regulation of embryonic stem cell pluripotency by heat shock protein 90. Stem Cells. 2012;30:1624–33. doi: 10.1002/stem.1143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Prinsloo E, Kramer AH, Edkins AL, Blatch GL. STAT3 interacts directly with Hsp90. IUBMB Life. 2012;64:266–73. doi: 10.1002/iub.607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Okumura F, Okumura AJ, Matsumoto M, Nakayama KI, Hatakeyama S. TRIM8 regulates Nanog via Hsp90β-mediated nuclear translocation of STAT3 in embryonic stem cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1813:1784–92. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2011.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Metcalf D. The unsolved enigmas of leukemia inhibitory factor. Stem Cells. 2003;21:5–14. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.21-1-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Metcalf D, Gearing DP. Fatal syndrome in mice engrafted with cells producing high levels of the leukemia inhibitory factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989;86:5948–52. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.15.5948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yu J, Thomson JA. Pluripotent stem cell lines. Genes Dev. 2008;22:1987–97. doi: 10.1101/gad.1689808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Pera MF, Tam PP. Extrinsic regulation of pluripotent stem cells. Nature. 2010;465:713–20. doi: 10.1038/nature09228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Nichols J, Smith A. Naive and primed pluripotent states. Cell Stem Cell. 2009;4:487–92. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2009.05.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Richards M, Tan SP, Tan JH, Chan WK, Bongso A. The transcriptome profile of human embryonic stem cells as defined by SAGE. Stem Cells. 2004;22:51–64. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.22-1-51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ginis I, Luo Y, Miura T, Thies S, Brandenberger R, Gerecht-Nir S, et al. Differences between human and mouse embryonic stem cells. Dev Biol. 2004;269:360–80. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2003.12.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Brons IG, Smithers LE, Trotter MW, Rugg-Gunn P, Sun B, Chuva de Sousa Lopes SM, et al. Derivation of pluripotent epiblast stem cells from mammalian embryos. Nature. 2007;448:191–5. doi: 10.1038/nature05950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tesar PJ, Chenoweth JG, Brook FA, Davies TJ, Evans EP, Mack DL, et al. New cell lines from mouse epiblast share defining features with human embryonic stem cells. Nature. 2007;448:196–9. doi: 10.1038/nature05972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ichikawa Y. Differentiation of a cell line of myeloid leukemia. J Cell Physiol. 1969;74:223–34. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1040740303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Maeda M, Horiuchi M, Numa S, Ichikawa Y. Characterization of a differentiation-stimulating factor for mouse myeloid leukemia cells. Gann. 1977;68:435–47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gearing DP, Gough NM, King JA, Hilton DJ, Nicola NA, Simpson RJ, et al. Molecular cloning and expression of cDNA encoding a murine myeloid leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF) EMBO J. 1987;6:3995–4002. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02742.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Simpson RJ, Moritz RL, Rubira MR, Van Snick J. Murine hybridoma/plasmacytoma growth factor. Complete amino-acid sequence and relation to human interleukin-6. Eur J Biochem. 1988;176:187–97. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1988.tb14267.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Simpson RJ, Hilton DJ, Nice EC, Rubira MR, Metcalf D, Gearing DP, et al. Structural characterization of a murine myeloid leukaemia inhibitory factor. Eur J Biochem. 1988;175:541–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1988.tb14226.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Rathjen PD, Toth S, Willis A, Heath JK, Smith AG. Differentiation inhibiting activity is produced in matrix-associated and diffusible forms that are generated by alternate promoter usage. Cell. 1990;62:1105–14. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90387-T. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Haines BP, Voyle RB, Pelton TA, Forrest R, Rathjen PD. Complex conserved organization of the mammalian leukemia inhibitory factor gene: regulated expression of intracellular and extracellular cytokines. J Immunol. 1999;162:4637–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Haines BP, Voyle RB, Rathjen PD. Intracellular and extracellular leukemia inhibitory factor proteins have different cellular activities that are mediated by distinct protein motifs. Mol Biol Cell. 2000;11:1369–83. doi: 10.1091/mbc.11.4.1369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Escary JL, Perreau J, Duménil D, Ezine S, Brûlet P. Leukaemia inhibitory factor is necessary for maintenance of haematopoietic stem cells and thymocyte stimulation. Nature. 1993;363:361–4. doi: 10.1038/363361a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bugga L, Gadient RA, Kwan K, Stewart CL, Patterson PH. Analysis of neuronal and glial phenotypes in brains of mice deficient in leukemia inhibitory factor. J Neurobiol. 1998;36:509–24. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4695(19980915)36:4<509::AID-NEU5>3.0.CO;2-#. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Rose TM, Weiford DM, Gunderson NL, Bruce AG, Oncostatin M. Oncostatin M (OSM) inhibits the differentiation of pluripotent embryonic stem cells in vitro. Cytokine. 1994;6:48–54. doi: 10.1016/1043-4666(94)90007-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Pennica D, King KL, Shaw KJ, Luis E, Rullamas J, Luoh SM, et al. Expression cloning of cardiotrophin 1, a cytokine that induces cardiac myocyte hypertrophy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:1142–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.4.1142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Conover JC, Ip NY, Poueymirou WT, Bates B, Goldfarb MP, DeChiara TM, et al. Ciliary neurotrophic factor maintains the pluripotentiality of embryonic stem cells. Development. 1993;119:559–65. doi: 10.1242/dev.119.3.559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wolf E, Kramer R, Polejaeva I, Thoenen H, Brem G. Efficient generation of chimaeric mice using embryonic stem cells after long-term culture in the presence of ciliary neurotrophic factor. Transgenic Res. 1994;3:152–8. doi: 10.1007/BF01973982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Yoshida K, Chambers I, Nichols J, Smith A, Saito M, Yasukawa K, et al. Maintenance of the pluripotential phenotype of embryonic stem cells through direct activation of gp130 signalling pathways. Mech Dev. 1994;45:163–71. doi: 10.1016/0925-4773(94)90030-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Nichols J, Chambers I, Smith A. Derivation of germline competent embryonic stem cells with a combination of interleukin-6 and soluble interleukin-6 receptor. Exp Cell Res. 1994;215:237–9. doi: 10.1006/excr.1994.1338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Tomida M, Yamamoto-Yamaguchi Y, Hozumi M. Purification of a factor inducing differentiation of mouse myeloid leukemic M1 cells from conditioned medium of mouse fibroblast L929 cells. J Biol Chem. 1984;259:10978–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Yamamori T, Fukada K, Aebersold R, Korsching S, Fann MJ, Patterson PH. The cholinergic neuronal differentiation factor from heart cells is identical to leukemia inhibitory factor. Science. 1989;246:1412–6. doi: 10.1126/science.2512641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Bonni A, Sun Y, Nadal-Vicens M, Bhatt A, Frank DA, Rozovsky I, et al. Regulation of gliogenesis in the central nervous system by the JAK-STAT signaling pathway. Science. 1997;278:477–83. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5337.477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Hirota H, Yoshida K, Kishimoto T, Taga T. Continuous activation of gp130, a signal-transducing receptor component for interleukin 6-related cytokines, causes myocardial hypertrophy in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:4862–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.11.4862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Li M, Sendtner M, Smith A. Essential function of LIF receptor in motor neurons. Nature. 1995;378:724–7. doi: 10.1038/378724a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ware CB, Horowitz MC, Renshaw BR, Hunt JS, Liggitt D, Koblar SA, et al. Targeted disruption of the low-affinity leukemia inhibitory factor receptor gene causes placental, skeletal, neural and metabolic defects and results in perinatal death. Development. 1995;121:1283–99. doi: 10.1242/dev.121.5.1283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Yoshida K, Taga T, Saito M, Suematsu S, Kumanogoh A, Tanaka T, et al. Targeted disruption of gp130, a common signal transducer for the interleukin 6 family of cytokines, leads to myocardial and hematological disorders. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:407–11. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.1.407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Davis S, Aldrich TH, Stahl N, Pan L, Taga T, Kishimoto T, et al. LIFR beta and gp130 as heterodimerizing signal transducers of the tripartite CNTF receptor. Science. 1993;260:1805–8. doi: 10.1126/science.8390097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Murakami M, Hibi M, Nakagawa N, Nakagawa T, Yasukawa K, Yamanishi K, et al. IL-6-induced homodimerization of gp130 and associated activation of a tyrosine kinase. Science. 1993;260:1808–10. doi: 10.1126/science.8511589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Liu L, McBride KM, Reich NC. STAT3 nuclear import is independent of tyrosine phosphorylation and mediated by importin-alpha3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:8150–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0501643102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Chen X, Xu H, Yuan P, Fang F, Huss M, Vega VB, et al. Integration of external signaling pathways with the core transcriptional network in embryonic stem cells. Cell. 2008;133:1106–17. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.04.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Minami M, Inoue M, Wei S, Takeda K, Matsumoto M, Kishimoto T, et al. STAT3 activation is a critical step in gp130-mediated terminal differentiation and growth arrest of a myeloid cell line. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:3963–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.9.3963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Takeda K, Noguchi K, Shi W, Tanaka T, Matsumoto M, Yoshida N, et al. Targeted disruption of the mouse Stat3 gene leads to early embryonic lethality. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:3801–4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.8.3801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Durbin JE, Hackenmiller R, Simon MC, Levy DE. Targeted disruption of the mouse Stat1 gene results in compromised innate immunity to viral disease. Cell. 1996;84:443–50. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81289-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Teglund S, McKay C, Schuetz E, van Deursen JM, Stravopodis D, Wang D, et al. Stat5a and Stat5b proteins have essential and nonessential, or redundant, roles in cytokine responses. Cell. 1998;93:841–50. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81444-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Heinrich PC, Behrmann I, Haan S, Hermanns HM, Müller-Newen G, Schaper F. Principles of interleukin (IL)-6-type cytokine signalling and its regulation. Biochem J. 2003;374:1–20. doi: 10.1042/BJ20030407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Paling NR, Wheadon H, Bone HK, Welham MJ. Regulation of embryonic stem cell self-renewal by phosphoinositide 3-kinase-dependent signaling. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:48063–70. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M406467200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Doble BW, Woodgett JR. GSK-3: tricks of the trade for a multi-tasking kinase. J Cell Sci. 2003;116:1175–86. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Bechard M, Dalton S. Subcellular localization of glycogen synthase kinase 3beta controls embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Mol Cell Biol. 2009;29:2092–104. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01405-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Niwa H, Ogawa K, Shimosato D, Adachi K. A parallel circuit of LIF signalling pathways maintains pluripotency of mouse ES cells. Nature. 2009;460:118–22. doi: 10.1038/nature08113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Watanabe S, Umehara H, Murayama K, Okabe M, Kimura T, Nakano T. Activation of Akt signaling is sufficient to maintain pluripotency in mouse and primate embryonic stem cells. Oncogene. 2006;25:2697–707. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Schiemann WP, Bartoe JL, Nathanson NM. Box 3-independent signaling mechanisms are involved in leukemia inhibitory factor receptor alpha- and gp130-mediated stimulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase. Evidence for participation of multiple signaling pathways which converge at Ras. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:16631–6. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.26.16631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Hamazaki T, Kehoe SM, Nakano T, Terada N. The Grb2/Mek pathway represses Nanog in murine embryonic stem cells. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26:7539–49. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00508-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Burdon T, Stracey C, Chambers I, Nichols J, Smith A. Suppression of SHP-2 and ERK signalling promotes self-renewal of mouse embryonic stem cells. Dev Biol. 1999;210:30–43. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1999.9265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Huibregtse JM, Scheffner M, Beaudenon S, Howley PM. A family of proteins structurally and functionally related to the E6-AP ubiquitin-protein ligase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:2563–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.7.2563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Joazeiro CA, Weissman AM. RING finger proteins: mediators of ubiquitin ligase activity. Cell. 2000;102:549–52. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00077-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Lorick KL, Jensen JP, Fang S, Ong AM, Hatakeyama S, Weissman AM. RING fingers mediate ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (E2)-dependent ubiquitination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:11364–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.20.11364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Aravind L, Koonin EV. The U box is a modified RING finger - a common domain in ubiquitination. Curr Biol. 2000;10:R132–4. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00398-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Hatakeyama S, Yada M, Matsumoto M, Ishida N, Nakayama KI. U box proteins as a new family of ubiquitin-protein ligases. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:33111–20. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M102755200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Reymond A, Meroni G, Fantozzi A, Merla G, Cairo S, Luzi L, et al. The tripartite motif family identifies cell compartments. EMBO J. 2001;20:2140–51. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.9.2140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Short KM, Cox TC. Subclassification of the RBCC/TRIM superfamily reveals a novel motif necessary for microtubule binding. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:8970–80. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M512755200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.McNab FW, Rajsbaum R, Stoye JP, O’Garra A. Tripartite-motif proteins and innate immune regulation. Curr Opin Immunol. 2011;23:46–56. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2010.10.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Sardiello M, Cairo S, Fontanella B, Ballabio A, Meroni G. Genomic analysis of the TRIM family reveals two groups of genes with distinct evolutionary properties. BMC Evol Biol. 2008;8:225. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-8-225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Azevedo C, Santos-Rosa MJ, Shirasu K. The U-box protein family in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2001;6:354–8. doi: 10.1016/S1360-1385(01)01960-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Datta S, Johansson H, Hettiarachchi C, Holm M. STH2 has 2 B there: An insight into the role of B-box containing proteins in Arabidopsis. Plant Signal Behav. 2008;3:547–8. doi: 10.4161/psb.3.8.5695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Meroni G, Diez-Roux G. TRIM/RBCC, a novel class of ‘single protein RING finger’ E3 ubiquitin ligases. Bioessays. 2005;27:1147–57. doi: 10.1002/bies.20304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Wormald S, Hilton DJ. Inhibitors of cytokine signal transduction. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:821–4. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R300030200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Yoshimura A, Ohkubo T, Kiguchi T, Jenkins NA, Gilbert DJ, Copeland NG, et al. A novel cytokine-inducible gene CIS encodes an SH2-containing protein that binds to tyrosine-phosphorylated interleukin 3 and erythropoietin receptors. EMBO J. 1995;14:2816–26. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07281.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Krebs DL, Hilton DJ. SOCS proteins: negative regulators of cytokine signaling. Stem Cells. 2001;19:378–87. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.19-5-378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Yasukawa H, Misawa H, Sakamoto H, Masuhara M, Sasaki A, Wakioka T, et al. The JAK-binding protein JAB inhibits Janus tyrosine kinase activity through binding in the activation loop. EMBO J. 1999;18:1309–20. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.5.1309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Ram PA, Waxman DJ. SOCS/CIS protein inhibition of growth hormone-stimulated STAT5 signaling by multiple mechanisms. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:35553–61. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.50.35553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Kamizono S, Hanada T, Yasukawa H, Minoguchi S, Kato R, Minoguchi M, et al. The SOCS box of SOCS-1 accelerates ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis of TEL-JAK2. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:12530–8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M010074200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Frantsve J, Schwaller J, Sternberg DW, Kutok J, Gilliland DG. Socs-1 inhibits TEL-JAK2-mediated transformation of hematopoietic cells through inhibition of JAK2 kinase activity and induction of proteasome-mediated degradation. Mol Cell Biol. 2001;21:3547–57. doi: 10.1128/MCB.21.10.3547-3557.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Orr SJ, Morgan NM, Elliott J, Burrows JF, Scott CJ, McVicar DW, et al. CD33 responses are blocked by SOCS3 through accelerated proteasomal-mediated turnover. Blood. 2007;109:1061–8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-05-023556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Orr SJ, Morgan NM, Buick RJ, Boyd CR, Elliott J, Burrows JF, et al. SOCS3 targets Siglec 7 for proteasomal degradation and blocks Siglec 7-mediated responses. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:3418–22. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C600216200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Tanaka T, Soriano MA, Grusby MJ. SLIM is a nuclear ubiquitin E3 ligase that negatively regulates STAT signaling. Immunity. 2005;22:729–36. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2005.04.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Vincent SR, Kwasnicka DA, Fretier P. A novel RING finger-B box-coiled-coil protein, GERP. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000;279:482–6. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2000.3984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Toniato E, Flati V, Laglia E, Mincione G, Martinotti S. Genomic organization and cytokine-mediated inducibility of the human TRIM-8/Gerp gene. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2004;17(Suppl):71–6. doi: 10.1177/03946320040170S212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Okumura F, Matsunaga Y, Katayama Y, Nakayama KI, Hatakeyama S. TRIM8 modulates STAT3 activity through negative regulation of PIAS3. J Cell Sci. 2010;123:2238–45. doi: 10.1242/jcs.068981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Sato T, Okumura F, Ariga T, Hatakeyama S. TRIM6 interacts with Myc and maintains the pluripotency of mouse embryonic stem cells. J Cell Sci. 2012;125:1544–55. doi: 10.1242/jcs.095273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Dang CV. MYC on the path to cancer. Cell. 2012;149:22–35. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Cartwright P, McLean C, Sheppard A, Rivett D, Jones K, Dalton S. LIF/STAT3 controls ES cell self-renewal and pluripotency by a Myc-dependent mechanism. Development. 2005;132:885–96. doi: 10.1242/dev.01670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Sumi T, Tsuneyoshi N, Nakatsuji N, Suemori H. Apoptosis and differentiation of human embryonic stem cells induced by sustained activation of c-Myc. Oncogene. 2007;26:5564–76. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Takahashi K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell. 2006;126:663–76. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Takayama N, Nishimura S, Nakamura S, Shimizu T, Ohnishi R, Endo H, et al. Transient activation of c-MYC expression is critical for efficient platelet generation from human induced pluripotent stem cells. J Exp Med. 2010;207:2817–30. doi: 10.1084/jem.20100844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Ying QL, Wray J, Nichols J, Batlle-Morera L, Doble B, Woodgett J, et al. The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Nature. 2008;453:519–23. doi: 10.1038/nature06968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]