Abstract
EMBO J 32 11: 1514–1528; March 22 2013; ; DOI: 10.1038/emboj.2013.65
Mitochondria undergo dynamic fission and fusion events, and disruptions in this balance can lead to cellular dysfunction or death. New work by Henley and colleagues identifies a key role for the SUMO protease SENP3 and its target Drp1, a key mediator of mitochondrial fission, in ischaemia.
The term mitochondrion is derived from the Greek mitos (thread) and khondrion (small grain), emphasizing the fundamental nature of its varied tubular and vesicular appearances within cells. Even this description belies the highly dynamic nature of mitochondria, which undergo continuous cycles of fission and fusion. Maintaining the proper balance between these competing processes is crucial for cellular homeostasis, and a variety of regulatory mechanisms fine tune this balance in different cellular contexts. The key players in mitochondrial fusion in metazoans are large, membrane-bound GTPases in the dynamin superfamily—mitofusin-1 and -2 and optic atrophy-1 (OPA1). Although a number of proteins including Mff, MiD49/51, Fis1, and actin cytoskeletal proteins have been implicated in the regulation of fission, they appear to do so predominantly through their effects on the dynamin-related GTPase Drp1, a protein present mostly in the cytoplasm that is specifically recruited to the mitochondrial outer membrane. After recruitment, Drp1 functions through a complex cycle comprising higher-order oligomerization to form a fission complex, GTPase-dependent constriction that triggers mitochondrial fission, and subsequent Drp1 disassembly and return to the cytoplasm as dimers/tetramers (Otera et al, 2013).
Post-translational modifications of Drp1 play important regulatory roles in mitochondrial fission. Known modifications include protein phosphorylation mediated by multiple different kinases, SUMOylation, ubiquitylation, S-nitrosylation, and O-linked-N-acetyl-glucosamine glycosylation. Each Drp1 protomer has four major domains: an N-terminal GTPase domain, a middle assembly domain, a B (or variable) domain, and a C-terminal GTPase-effector domain (GED). Interestingly, the majority of modification sites are found on residues within the variable B domain, with a smaller number in the adjacent GED domain. To add further complexity, there are several known differentially spliced mRNA cassettes within the variable B domain in human Drp1. These modifications can be altered in numerous physiologic and pathologic states, including cell division, neurodegenerative diseases, starvation, and programmed cell death, with often profound effects on the cellular mitochondrial fission/fusion balance (Chang and Blackstone, 2010; Strack and Cribbs, 2012; Otera et al, 2013).
SUMOylation of substrate proteins has been of particular interest in experimental models of ischaemia, with a number of studies showing global increases in SUMOylation during ischaemic stress, particularly in the brain (Núñez-O'Mara and Berra, 2013). Importantly, SUMOylation induction is protective during cerebral ischaemia, and SUMOylation is increased during hibernation torpor, a model of natural tolerance to ischaemia where cerebral blood flow can fall to 10% of baseline for weeks at a time (Lee et al, 2011, 2012). There are three human SUMO paralogues (SUMO1–3), which are conjugated to lysine resides in target proteins via a cascade comprising an E1 complex (SAE1/SAE2), a single E2 (Ubc9), and various E3 ligases. SUMO-2 and -3 are nearly identical in amino acid sequence, and are often referred to and studied collectively; SUMO-1 is only about 45% identical to the others. SUMO proteins are removed from substrates by the SENP family of isopeptidases. There are six SENPs in mammals, SENP1–3 and SENP5–7, with SENP3 and SENP5 favouring removal of SUMO2/3 over SUMO1. The dynamic balance between activities of Ubc9 and SENPs determines the SUMOylation state of proteins.
In this issue of The EMBO Journal, Guo et al (2013) show that the deSUMOylating enzyme SENP3 is degraded acutely during oxygen/glucose deprivation, an in vitro model of ischaemia, through a pathway involving the unfolded protein response kinase PERK and the lysosomal protease cathepsin B. This depletion of SENP3 prolongs SUMOylation of the Drp1 GTPase, driving it into the cytoplasm and suppressing mitochondrial division, cytochrome c release, and caspase-mediated cell death. However, upon reoxygenation SENP3 levels rise, deSUMOylating Drp1 and increasing its association with (and division of) mitochondria, cytochrome c release, and cell death. Importantly, depletion of SENP3 by RNA interference protected cells from reoxygenation-induced cell death in a manner that required Drp1 SUMOylation (Figure 1). Thus, the Guo et al (2013) study provides a potential mechanism for the reperfusion injuries that are so important in the pathogenesis of a variety of disease-related vascular events, including acute cerebral ischaemia. These findings take on added significance, because a recent study of acute spinal cord injury in rodents also found an increase in SENP3 expression peaking several days after the injury, before declining (Wei et al, 2012). This latter study also found that inducing oxidative stress with H2O2 in pheochromocytoma-derived PC12 cells resulted in increased levels of SENP3 over a period of hours, in step with apoptosis.
Figure 1.
Drp1 SUMO-2/3-ylation pathway. During ischaemic stress, SENP3 is degraded, prolonging Drp1 SUMOylation and shifting Drp1 localization to the cytoplasm. Reoxygenation-induced SENP3 recovery results in deSUMOylation of Drp1, with increased Drp1 localization to the mitochondria and subsequent mitochondrial fragmentation, cytochrome c (cyt c) release, and cell death. S, SUMO-2/3 modification.
Yet, the more general roles of Drp1 SUMOylation in cell death pathways are more complex. McBride and colleagues have previously shown that SUMOylated Drp1 is more stable and has increased residence time on the mitochondrial outer membrane, and also that SUMOylation (mostly SUMO-1) is increased during staurosporine-induced apoptosis in a Bax/Bak-dependent manner, with an increase in mitochondrial fragmentation. They identified SEN5P as a protease that cleaves SUMOylated mitochondrial substrates, including Drp1 (Wasiak et al, 2007). Despite the seemingly opposite effects of SUMOylation on mitochondrial fission between this latter study and that of Guo et al (2013), SUMOylation itself seems likely to occur at the same few sites within the B domain of Drp1 (Figueroa-Romero et al (2009); Guo et al, 2013). This situation is reminiscent of the dual effects of identical protein phosphorylation modifications on Drp1 function. For instance, whereas protein kinase A phosphorylation at Ser 637 (human Drp1 splice variant 1 numbering) is associated with decreased Drp1 activity and inhibition of mitochondrial fission, CaM kinase 1α- or ROCK1-dependent phosphorylation at the same Ser residue increases mitochondrial fission (reviewed in Chang and Blackstone, 2010; Otera et al, 2013).
There are several compelling mechanisms for how the same, or highly similar, Drp1 modifications can give rise to such different functional outcomes. First, modifications could occur at different times and locations during the Drp1 activity cycle, with different impacts. Second, distinct signalling cascades could induce a variety of alterations in other proteins coincidentally. For example, in addition to its role in Drp1 deSUMOylation, SENP3 is essential for rRNA processing, angiogenesis, and cell proliferation, and it translocates from the nucleoli to the nucleoplasm in response to modest increases in reactive oxygen species. Finally, Drp1 itself may have different combinations of post-translational modifications depending on the signalling cascades involved, with cross-talk among them.
It is increasingly apparent that the Drp1 GTPase is the predominant mediator of mitochondria division. A broad range of interacting and modifying proteins provides Drp1 with the flexibility to respond to diverse stimuli, but also exposes a vulnerability to insults. The pathway described by Guo et al (2013), in which SENP3 stability acts as a switch to regulate SUMO-2/3-ylation of Drp1 and consequently cytochome c release and apoptosis, presents a potential therapeutic target for increasing resistance to ischaemic stress, with important implications for minimizing damage from acute ischaemia and possibly other injuries.
Acknowledgments
The research activities of CAA and CB are supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders, National Institutes of Health. CAA is also supported by the Wellcome Trust.
Footnotes
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
References
- Chang C-R, Blackstone C (2010) Dynamic regulation of mitochondrial fission through modification of the dynamin-related protein Drp1. Ann NY Acad Sci 1201: 34–39 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Figueroa-Romero C, Iñiguez-Lhuhí JA, Stadler J, Chang C-R, Arnoult D, Keller PJ, Hong Y, Blackstone C, Feldman EL (2009) SUMOylation of the mitochondrial fission protein Drp1 occurs at multiple nonconsensus sites within the B domain and is linked to its activity cycle. FASEB J 23: 3917–3927 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guo C, Hildick KL, Luo J, Dearden L, Wilkinson KA, Henley JM (2013) SENP3-mediated deSUMOylation of dynamin-related protein 1 promotes cell death following ischaemia. EMBO J 32: 1514–1528 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee YJ, Mou Y, Maric D, Klimanis D, Auh S, Hallenbeck JM (2011) Elevated global SUMOylation in Ubc9 transgenic mice protects their brains against focal cerebral ischemic damage. PLoS ONE 6: e25852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee YJ, Johnson KR, Hallenbeck JM (2012) Global protein conjugation by ubiquitin-like-modifiers during ischemic stress is regulated by microRNAs and confers robust tolerance to ischemia. PLoS ONE 7: e47787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Núñez-O'Mara A, Berra E (2013) Deciphering the emerging role of SUMO conjugation in the hypoxia-signaling cascade. Biol Chem 394: 459–469 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Otera H, Ishihara N, Mihara K (2013) New insights into the function and regulation of mitochondrial fission. Biochim Biophys Acta 1833: 1256–1268 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Strack S, Cribbs JT (2012) Allosteric modulation of Drp1 mechanoenzyme assembly and mitochondrial fission by the variable domain. J Biol Chem 287: 10990–11001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wasiak S, Zunino R, McBride HM (2007) Bax/Bak promote sumoylation of DRP1 and its stable association with mitochondria during apoptotic cell death. J Cell Biol 177: 439–450 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wei H, Teng H, Huan W, Zhang S, Fu H, Chen F, Wang J, Wu C, Zhao J (2012) An upregulation of SENP3 after spinal cord injury: implications for neuronal apoptosis. Neurochem Res 37: 2758–2766 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

