With great interest we read the recent article by Alfieri and colleagues [1], demonstrating that angiopoietin (Ang)-1 variant MAT.Ang-1 improved endotoxemiainduced microvascular dysfunction and microvascular hyperpermeability. The authors suggested that MAT. Ang-1-induced recovery of microcirculatory tissue perfusion during sepsis is due to preservation of endothelial barrier integrity. To further elucidate the mechanism, they investigated the possibility of involvement of VE-cadherin, a major adherens junctions protein responsible for microvascular leakage in inflammation. They found, however, while there was no change in overall expression of VE-cadherin, MAT.Ang-1 increased VE-cadherin phosphorylation in the treated mice, which appears unable to explain the observed endothelial barrier protective effects of MAT.Ang-1.
The work by Dejana and co-workers [2] highlights the critical role of VE-cadherin for maintenance of endothelial barrier function. It is generally accepted that the tyrosine phosphorylation of VE-cadherin and other components of adherens junctions induced by permeability-increasing agents is associated with weak junctions and impaired barrier function via regulating VE-cadherin member localization [2]. Recently, among the nine tyrosines in the cytoplasmic tail of VE-cadherin, Potter and colleagues [3] revealed that tyrosine phosphorylation of VE-cadherin at two critical tyrosines, Tyr-658 and Tyr-731, was sufficient to disrupt VE-cadherin-mediated cell-cell junctions, leading to inhibition of cell barrier function.
Previous studies have shown that Ang-1 restores the endothelial barrier function via phosphorylation-dependent redistribution of VE-cadherin [4,5]. While in the present study the total amount of VE-cadherin was not changed, intriguingly MAT.Ang-1 increases VE-cadherin phosphorylation (at Y658) in sepsis. This is unexpected because the endothelial barrier protective effects of MAT.Ang-1 do not seem to be consistent with its effect on an important cellular junction molecule involved in endothelial cell integrity, namely VE-cadherin; however, other mechanisms of action cannot be ruled out. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to investigate the mechanisms by which this novel Ang-1 variant rescues the endothelial barrier function.
Authors' response
Alessio Alfieri, Nicola J Brown and Zoe L Brookes
We appreciate the interest and insightful comments made by Zhang and colleagues concerning our recent research article. The functional in vivo studies presented in our manuscript demonstrated that MAT.Ang-1 reduced macromolecular leak and improved tissue perfusion without significantly changing the diameter of microvessels, thus suggesting that the protective effects induced by MAT.Ang-1 depend on preserving the endothelial barrier integrity. In addition to the well-recognized role in controlling vascular permeability, VE-cadherin and associated junctional proteins form part of complex signaling cascades regulating important cellular functions [6]. In particular, as discussed in our manuscript, disassembly of the VE-cadherin complex triggers an intracellular negative signal reducing transendothelial leukocyte migration in mice 6 hours after challenge with lipopolysaccharide [7]. Therefore, an increase in VE-cadherin phosphorylation paralleled by reduced interleukin-1β protein expression may be a mechanism by which MAT.Ang-1 induces protection against microvascular stasis in sepsis. Furthermore, lipopolysaccharide-induced endotoxemia increases the expression of several inflammatory cytokines (for example, tumor necrosis factor-α), which in turn cause macromolecular leak [8]. Therefore, in vivo a complex mechanistic scenario develops in sepsis with regards to the endothelial barrier function, which is difficult to unravel. The elegant studies referenced by Zhang and colleagues concerning Ang-1 and VE-cadherin phosphorylation report in vitro findings, whereas all our results are from septic mice in vivo with or without MAT.Ang-1 post-treatment. Nevertheless, we agree that further investigations are required before making firm conclusions on the effects of MAT.Ang-1 on the endothelium in sepsis - for instance, studies aimed at providing a complete in vivo time-course of the expression, localization and phosphorylation of endothelial junctional proteins would be extremely informative.
Abbreviations
Ang: angiopoietin.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
See related research by Alfieri et al., http://ccforum.com/content/16/5/R182
Contributor Information
Ru-Yuan Zhang, Email: ruyuan.zhang@hotmail.com.
Dong Min, Email: mindongicu@163.com.
Jun Wu, Email: rjwujun@163.com.
Lei Li, Email: dorlilei@163.com.
Hong-Ping Qu, Email: hongping_qu@163.com.
Yao-Qing Tang, Email: yaoqing.tang@hotmail.com.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, Grant No. 81071534).
References
- Alfieri A, Watson JJ, Kammerer RA, Tasab M, Progias P, Reeves K, Brown NJ, Brookes ZL. Angiopoietin-1 variant reduces LPS-induced microvascular dysfunction in a murine model of sepsis. Crit Care. 2012;16:R182. doi: 10.1186/cc11666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dejana E, Orsenigo F, Lampugnani MG. The role of adherens junctions and VE-cadherin in the control of vascular permeability. J Cell Sci. 2008;16:2115–2122. doi: 10.1242/jcs.017897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Potter MD, Barbero S, Cheresh DA. Tyrosine phosphorylation of VE-cadherin prevents binding of p120- and beta-catenin and maintains the cellular mesenchymal state. J Biol Chem. 2005;16:31906–31912. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M505568200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gamble JR, Drew J, Trezise L, Underwood A, Parsons M, Kasminkas L, Rudge J, Yancopoulos G, Vadas MA. Angiopoietin-1 is an antipermeability and anti-inflammatory agent in vitro and targets cell junctions. Circ Res. 2000;16:603–607. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.87.7.603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee SW, Won JY, Lee HY, Lee HJ, Youn SW, Lee JY, Cho CH, Cho HJ, Oh S, Chae IH, Kim HS. Angiopoietin-1 protects heart against ischemia/reperfusion injury through VE-cadherin dephosphorylation and myocardiac integrinbeta1/ERK/caspase-9 phosphorylation cascade. Mol Med. 2011;16:1095–1106. doi: 10.2119/molmed.2011.00106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harris SE, Nelson WJ. VE-cadherin: at the front, center, and sides of endothelial cell organization and function. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2012;16:651–658. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2010.07.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Orrington-Myers J, Gao X, Kouklis P, Broman M, Rahman A, Vogel SM, Malik AB. Regulation of lung neutrophil recruitment by VE-cadherin. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2006;16:L764–L771. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00502.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sprague AH, Khalil RA. Inflammatory cytokines in vascular dysfunction and vascular disease. Biochem Pharmacol. 2009;16:539–552. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2009.04.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
