Skip to main content
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 2013 Mar;103(3):449–453. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300878

Young Adult Smoking Cessation: Predictors of Quit Attempts and Abstinence

Lori M Diemert 1,, Susan J Bondy 1, K Stephen Brown 1, Steve Manske 1
PMCID: PMC3673495  PMID: 23327264

Abstract

We examined young adult smoking cessation behaviors, coding cessation behavior as no attempt, quit attempt (< 30 days), or abstinence (≥ 30 days) during follow-up from July 2005 through December 2008, observed in 592 young adult smokers from the Ontario Tobacco Survey. One in 4 young adults made an attempt; 14% obtained 30-day abstinence. Cessation resources, prior attempts, and intention predicted quit attempts, whereas high self-efficacy, using resources, having support, and low addiction predicted abstinence, indicating that young adult smokers require effective and appropriate cessation resources.


Young adults have had the highest smoking prevalence among all age groups.1,2 Over the past decade, the prevalence of quit attempts increased among Americans aged 45 to 64 years; however, it remained stable among young adults.3 A recent review concluded that the determinants of young adult cessation are not well understood.4 Previous longitudinal studies in this population have long follow-up intervals—3 to 7 years5–12—which means that certain measures (e.g., self-efficacy) may have changed across time and are no longer relevant to predict the later behavior. We examined proximate predictors of young adult smoking cessation behaviors in a prospective study with a 6-month follow-up.

METHODS

We compiled data from 592 young adult smokers (aged 18–29 years) with a 6-month follow-up from July 2005 through December 2008 from the Ontario Tobacco Survey, a population-representative cohort of smokers in Ontario, Canada.13,14 We classified smoking cessation behavior as no quit attempt, attempt to quit (lasting < 30 days), and 30-day abstinence during follow-up. Guided by social cognitive theory,15,16 we chose the following covariates: sociodemographic characteristics, smoking addiction,17,18 quitting history, intentions, beliefs, and social and environmental factors (Table 1).

TABLE 1—

Respondent Characteristics by Young Adult Smoking Cessation Behavior at 6-Month Follow-Up: Ontario Tobacco Survey, July 2005–December 2008

Characteristic No Attempt to Quit Smoking (n = 375), No.a (%)bc or Mean ±SD (SE Estimate) Quit Attempt, < 30 Days (n = 149), No.a (%)bc or Mean ±SD (SE Estimate) Abstinence, ≥ 30 Days (n = 68), No.a (%)bc or Mean ±SD (SE Estimate) Pd
Continuous variables
Age (n = 592), y 23.47 ±3.50 (0.25) 23.35 ±3.19 (0.32) 23.14 ±3.39 (0.56) .564
Heaviness of smoking index (n = 580) 1.76 ±1.59 (0.11) 1.61 ±1.54 (0.16) 0.67 ±1.19 (0.15) < .001
Categorized variables
Gender (n = 592)
 Women 187 (61.2) 63 (23.1) 37 (15.6) .569
 Men 188 (60.9) 86 (26.9) 31 (12.1)
Education (n = 591)
 ≤ high school 221 (63.0) 96 (28.0) 30 (9.1) .045
 > high school 153 (58.7) 53 (22.7) 38 (18.6)
Employment (n = 592)
 Unemployed 94 (61.1) 30 (22.6) 19 (16.3) .664
 Employed 281 (61.0) 119 (26.2) 49 (12.7)
Marital status (n = 592)
 Single 231 (61.7) 102 (26.2) 40 (12.1) .509
 Married or common law marriage 144 (59.5) 47 (23.7) 28 (16.8)
Self-efficacy (n = 592)
 Less or uncertain confidence 259 (61.6) 111 (27.5) 40 (10.9) .137
 Very confident 116 (59.9) 38 (21.3) 28 (18.7)
Perceived health (n = 592)
 Good, fair, or poor 197 (60.1) 84 (27.4) 33 (12.5) .668
 Very good or excellent 178 (62.1) 65 (23.3) 35 (14.7)
Perceived benefits to quitting (n = 591)
 Benefit a little or not at all 89 (65.5) 20 (20.7) 12 (13.8) .644
 Benefit quite a bit or a lot 285 (59.9) 129 (26.7) 56 (13.5)
Use of cessation resources or supportse (n = 587)
 No 226 (69.5) 64 (21.6) 27 (8.9) .005
 Yes 148 (52.0) 85 (30.2) 37 (17.8)
Support to quitf (n = 592)
 No known support 39 (54.3) 16 (42.3) 5 (3.4) .006
 Yes 336 (61.7) 133 (23.9) 63 (14.4)
Smoking in the home (n = 592)
 People smoke indoors 148 (67.4) 53 (24.3) 16 (8.2) .108
 No one smokes indoors 227 (58.4) 96 (25.9) 52 (15.7)
Someone to make quitting difficult (n = 592)
 No 129 (63.0) 31 (19.9) 28 (17.2) .189
 Yes 246 (60.0) 118 (28.3) 40 (11.6)
Exposure to tobacco industry marketingg (n = 591)
 No 343 (60.4) 133 (25.2) 64 (14.4) .236
 Yes 31 (67.1) 16 (27.9) 4 (5.0)
Exposure to antitobacco mass media campaignsg (n = 592)
 No 45 (66.7) 12 (17.1) 5 (16.3) .506
 Yes 330 (60.4) 137 (26.5) 63 (13.2)
Prior number of quit attempts (n = 592)
 0 88 (75.2) 12 (10.4) 12 (14.4) .002
 1 130 (66.3) 30 (19.8) 22 (14.0)
 ≥2 157 (51.4) 107 (35.8) 34 (12.8)
Quit intention (n = 592)
 No 256 (73.1) 53 (17.3) 27 (9.6) < .001
 Yes 119 (45.5) 96 (35.9) 41 (18.6)
Perceived addiction (n = 590)
 Less addicted 180 (59.3) 66 (21.3) 45 (19.4) < .001
 Very addicted 193 (62.7) 83 (30.8) 23 (6.4)
Smoking medications make quitting a lot easierh (n = 592)
 No 318 (63.1) 113 (23.7) 56 (13.2) .197
 Yes 57 (50.5) 36 (34.4) 12 (15.1)
Counseling makes quitting a lot easierh (n = 592)
 No 323 (61.5) 128 (25.7) 55 (12.8) .642
 Yes 52 (57.9) 21 (24.0) 13 (18.1)

Note. Respondents were self-report smokers at baseline who smoked in the past 30 days and at least 100 lifetime cigarettes who also reported their age (n = 592). The heaviness of smoking index is an addiction scale that is calculated according to the number of cigarettes smoked per day and time to first cigarette of the day. These questions tend to have more “don’t know” responses, resulting in slightly more missing data for this variable (n = 12).

a

Unweighted sample size.

b

Weighted estimates. Estimates may not sum to 100% because of rounding.

c

Missing data were not used in the calculation of statistical tests or weighted estimates.

d

P values were determined using the χ2 test for association, which identifies differences across all levels; this test does not identify between which cells the differences are meaningful; all expected cell values were adequate for testing.

e

Use of cessation aids and resources include any use of self-help materials, behavioral therapies, pharmacotherapies, physician advice to quit smoking, and participation in a local quit program measured during 6-month follow-up; we measured all other characteristics at the baseline interview.

f

Support to quit (yes vs no, “don’t know”) was determined from the question “If you decided to quit smoking, do you have someone you can count on for support?”

g

Exposure to tobacco marketing and antitobacco mass media campaigns were self-reported exposure (yes or no) in the past 6 months measured at the baseline interview.

h

Perceived knowledge for the benefits of stop smoking medications and counseling.

Using multivariable logistic regression models with covariates associated with the outcome (P < .2), we examined predictors of quit attempts (vs no attempt) and abstinence (vs attempt and no attempt). We conducted analyses using SAS version 9.2,19 accounting for the complex survey design and weighted to the population.

RESULTS

Sixty percent of young adults made no attempt to quit smoking; 25% made an attempt, and 14% were abstinent for 30 days or longer during follow-up. Education, level of addiction, using resources, having support, prior attempts, quit intention, and perceived addiction were significantly associated with young adult cessation behaviors (P < .05; Table 1).

Four factors predicted quit attempts among young adults in the multivariate models: using resources, 2 or more prior quit attempts, quit intention, and knowledge of stop smoking medication benefits (Table 2). Abstinence for 30 days or longer was greater among those who were confident in their ability to quit smoking, had used cessation resources, had support, or had lower levels of addiction (Table 2).

TABLE 2—

Simultaneously Adjusted Multivariable Logistic Regression Models of Factors Predicting Young Adult Smoking Cessation Behaviors: Ontario Tobacco Survey, July 2005–December 2008

Characteristic Model 1: Attempt to Quit (< 30 d) vs No Attempt to Quit, OR (95% CI)a Model 2: Abstinence (≥ 30 d) vs Attempt (< 30 d) and No Attempt to Quit, OR (95% CI)a
Age, y 0.97 (0.89, 1.06) 0.94 (0.83, 1.07)
Heaviness of smoking index 0.85 (0.68, 1.06) 0.64* (0.46, 0.89)
Gender
 Women (Ref) 1.00 1.00
 Men 1.52 (0.81, 2.87) 0.74 (0.36, 1.52)
Education
 ≤ high school (Ref) 1.00 1.00
 > high school 0.84 (0.42, 1.67) 1.81 (0.73, 4.50)
Self-efficacy
 Less or uncertain confidence (Ref) 1.00 1.00
 Very confident 0.53 (0.26, 1.06) 3.27* (1.15, 9.28)
Use of cessation resources or supportsb
 No (Ref) 1.00 1.00
 Yes 1.86* (1.05, 3.31) 3.46* (1.66, 7.19)
Support to quitc
 No (Ref) 1.00 1.00
 Yes 0.42 (0.16, 1.10) 4.88* (1.29, 18.44)
Smoking in the home
 People smoke indoors (Ref) 1.00 1.00
 No one smokes indoors 1.79 (0.97, 3.32) 1.31 (0.52, 3.27)
Someone make quitting more difficult
 No (Ref) 1.00 1.00
 Yes 1.14 (0.57, 2.29) 0.72 (0.34, 1.51)
Prior number of quit attempts
 0 (Ref) 1.00 1.00
 1 1.46 (0.51, 4.17) 1.34 (0.45, 4.02)
 ≥ 2 3.50* (1.28, 9.55) 1.58 (0.54, 4.59)
Quit intention
 No (Ref) 1.00 1.00
 Yes 3.94* (2.22, 6.99) 1.48 (0.74, 2.98)
Perceived addiction
 Less addicted (Ref) 1.00 1.00
 Very addicted 1.20 (0.57, 2.51) 0.58 (0.26, 1.29)
Smoking medications make quitting a lot easierd
 No (Ref) 1.00 1.00
 Yes 2.30* (1.16, 4.57) 1.54 (0.60, 3.95)

Note. CI = confidence ratio; OR = odds ratio. Data are weighted.

a

Variance inflation factor statistics were all satisfactory in both models.

b

Use of cessation aids and resources include any use of self-help materials, behavioral therapies, pharmacotherapies, physician advice to quit smoking, and participation in a local quit program measured during 6-month follow-up; all other characteristics were measured at the baseline interview.

c

Support to quit (yes vs no, “don’t know”) was determined from the question “If you decided to quit smoking, do you have someone you can count on for support?”

d

Perceived knowledge for the benefits of stop smoking medications and counseling.

*P < .05.

DISCUSSION

We assessed prospective predictors of cessation among young adult smokers. We identified different predictors for quit attempts and abstinence; only the use of cessation resources—known to increase cessation20,21—contributed to both. We combined all forms of cessation resources; however, resources used for making an attempt may differ from those used to maintain abstinence. There is limited evidence of effective interventions for young adult smokers22–24; thus, the resources used for smoking cessation deserve further attention in this high-risk population.

Intention to quit smoking has been shown to be predictive of both young adult quit attempts7 and smoking cessation.7,8,25 Our findings agree with respect to quit attempts but not smoking cessation. Previous studies measured quit intention 5 to 7 years before measuring cessation.7,8,25 Behavioral intentions are likely to change more frequently; thus, intention measured more than 5 years before behavior change may not appropriately reflect the observed change. Our findings are congruent with the literature on adult smoking cessation, which shows that intention to quit predicts quit attempts but not cessation.26,27

Corresponding with the literature, high self-efficacy for quitting was a strong predictor of abstinence.8 Increased exposure to smokers reduces smoking cessation.5–10,25 Although we did not ask about exposure to smokers per se, the measure of smokers’ support to quit (i.e., social environment) played an important role in young adult cessation.

Smokers with greater addiction were less likely to maintain their abstinence, as in previous studies.6,7,28,29 It is evident that addiction plays an important role in young adult smoking cessation, raising the question about gradual reduction in smoking before full abstinence. In a cohort study of Australian young adult women, smokers were found to be more likely to quit if they reduced to nondaily smoking.30 By contrast, a cohort study of adult smokers concluded that those quitting cold turkey were more likely to abstain than were those cutting down to quit.31 Demonstrating the impact of smoking reduction on young adult cessation is needed to recommend reduction as an effective cessation strategy for this population.

We used prospective data from a population-based sample of young adult smokers with shorter follow-up periods; however, future research using similar data should explore the predictors of long-term smoking cessation and relapse in this population. Findings highlight the fundamental importance of resources in smoking cessation among young adults; a wide range of effective and appropriate cessation resources are needed to help these smokers make quit attempts and maintain abstinence. The setting for this study—Ontario, Canada—has extensive tobacco control initiatives but no unified cessation system or widespread specialized services for young adults.24 The generalizability of findings is unknown; thus, comparative data from other jurisdictions on the effectiveness of these resources would be valuable. The high smoking rates among young adults is concerning. Enhancing cessation efforts in this population has the potential to significantly improve the health of the public.

Acknowledgments

The Ontario Tobacco Survey is an initiative of the Ontario Tobacco Research Unit that receives funding from the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care.

The authors would like to acknowledge Joanna Cohen, Roberta Ferrence, John Garcia, Paul McDonald, Robert Schwartz, Peter Selby, and J. Charles Victor for their contributions to the development and design of the Ontario Tobacco Survey. We also thank J. Charles Victor and Michael Chaiton for their invaluable assistance with the Ontario Tobacco Survey data.

Human Participant Protection

The Ontario Tobacco Survey protocols and study instruments received ethical approvals from the University of Toronto and the University of Waterloo.

References

  • 1.Health Canada. Canadian Tobacco Use Monitoring Survey (CTUMS). Smoking Prevalence 1999–2010. Ottawa, Canada; September 2011. Available at: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hc-ps/tobac-tabac/research-recherche/stat/_ctums-esutc_prevalence/prevalence-eng.php. Accessed March 2, 2012.
  • 2.US Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2004.
  • 3.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Quitting smoking among adults—United States, 2001–2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60(44):1513–1519 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cengelli S, O’Loughlin J, Lauzon B, Cornuz J. A systematic review of longitudinal population-based studies on the predictors of smoking cessation in adolescent and young adult smokers. Tob Control. 2012;21(3):355–362 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chassin L, Presson CC, Rose JS, Sherman SJ. The natural history of cigarette smoking from adolescence to adulthood: demographic predictors of continuity and change. Health Psychol. 1996;15(6):478–484 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Paavola M, Vartiainen E, Puska P. Smoking cessation between teenage years and adulthood. Health Educ Res. 2001;16(1):49–57 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rose JS, Chassin L, Presson CC, Sherman SJ. Prospective predictors of quit attempts and smoking cessation in young adults. Health Psychol. 1996;15(4):261–268 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ellickson PL, McGuigan KA, Klein DJ. Predictors of late-onset smoking and cessation over 10 years. J Adolesc Health. 2001;29(2):101–108 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tucker JS, Ellickson PL, Orlando M, Klein DJ. Predictors of attempted quitting and cessation among young adult smokers. Prev Med. 2005;41(2):554–561 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chen PH, White HR, Pandina RJ. Predictors of smoking cessation from adolescence into young adulthood. Addict Behav. 2001;26(4):517–529 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Brook DW, Brook JS, Zhang C, Whiteman M, Cohen P, Finch SJ. Developmental trajectories of cigarette smoking from adolescence to the early thirties: personality and behavioral risk factors. Nicotine Tob Res. 2008;10(8):1283–1291 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Macy JT, Seo DC, Chassin L, Presson CC, Sherman SJ. Prospective predictors of long-term abstinence versus relapse among smokers who quit as young adults. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(8):1470–1475 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Diemert L, Chaiton M, Victor JC, Bondy S. Ontario Tobacco Survey Technical Report 2: Six and Twelve Month Data. Toronto, Canada: Ontario Tobacco Research Unit; April 2010 [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Diemert L, Victor JC, Chaiton M, Bondy SJ. Ontario Tobacco Survey Technical Report 1: Baseline Data. Toronto, Canada: Ontario Tobacco Research Unit; April 2010 [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1986 [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, eds. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research and Practice. 4th ed San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2008 [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Rickert W, Robinson J. Measuring the heaviness of smoking: using self-reported time to the first cigarette of the day and number of cigarettes smoked per day. Br J Addict. 1989;84(7):791–799 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Etter JF, Duc TV, Perneger TV. Validity of the Fagerstrom Test for nicotine dependence and of the Heaviness of Smoking Index among relatively light smokers. Addiction. 1999;94(2):269–281 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. SAS, Version 9.2. [computer program]. Cary, NC: SAS Institute; 2009.
  • 20.Clinical Practice Guideline Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence 2008 Update Panel, Liaisons, and Staff. A clinical practice guideline for treating tobacco use and dependence: 2008 update. A U.S. Public Health Service report. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35(2):158–176 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Stead LF, Perera R, Bullen C, Mant D, Lancaster T. Nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(1):CD000146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Villanti AC, McKay HS, Abrams DB, Holtgrave DR, Bowie JV. Smoking-cessation interventions for U.S. young adults: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2010;39(6):564–574 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lantz PM. Smoking on the rise among young adults: implications for research and policy. Tob Control. 2003;12(suppl 1):i60–i70 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Smoke-Free Ontario, Scientific Advisory Committee. Evidence to Guide Action: Comprehensive Tobacco Control in Ontario. Toronto, Canada: Ontario Agency for Health Protection and Promotion; 2010. Available at: http://www.oahpp.ca/services/documents/evidence-to-guide-action/Evidence%20to%20Guide%20Action%20-%20CTC%20in%20Ontario%20SFO-SAC%202010E.PDF. Accessed March 2, 2012.
  • 25.Tucker JS, Ellickson PL, Klein DJ. Smoking cessation during the transition from adolescence to young adulthood. Nicotine Tob Res. 2002;4(3):321–332 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhou X, Nonnemaker J, Sherrill B, Gilsenan AW, Coste F, West R. Attempts to quit smoking and relapse: factors associated with success or failure from the ATTEMPT cohort study. Addict Behav. 2009;34(4):365–373 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Vangeli E, Stapleton J, Smit ES, Borland R, West R. Predictors of attempts to stop smoking and their success in adult general population samples: a systematic review. Addiction. 2011;106(12):2110–2121 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.McDermott L, Dobson A, Owen N. Determinants of continuity and change over 10 years in young women’s smoking. Addiction. 2009;104(3):478–487 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Breslau N, Peterson EL. Smoking cessation in young adults: age at initiation of cigarette smoking and other suspected influences. Am J Public Health. 1996;86(2):214–220 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.McDermott L, Dobson A, Owen N. Smoking reduction and cessation among young adult women: a 7-year prospective analysis. Nicotine Tob Res. 2008;10(9):1457–1466 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Cheong Y, Yong HH, Borland R. Does how you quit affect success? A comparison between abrupt and gradual methods using data from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Study. Nicotine Tob Res. 2007;9(8):801–810 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES